In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for 3
years.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
01/31/2013
36 Months From Approved
02/28/2010
7
0
860
86
0
2,810
5,305
0
0
In 1978, Congress passed the Public
Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), which aimed to encourage
conservation of energy through efficient use of energy resources
and facilities by electric utilities. PURPA requirements encouraged
energy conservation by promoting the production of electric power
by cogeneration facilities that use reject heat associated with
commercial or industrial processes, and by small power production
facilities that use other wastes and renewable resources. PURPA
established various benefits to promote the development and use of
these types of generation facilities, however facilities were
required to meet certain technical and corporate criteria in order
to qualify for these benefits. Facilities meeting these criteria
are called qualifying facilities (QFs). The criteria for
qualification as a QF, as well as benefits afforded QFs, are
described in PURPA sections 201-203. Prior to the enactment of the
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), a public utility was
obligated under PURPA to sell or purchase electric power from a QF.
However section 1253(a) of EPAct 2005 amended PURPA by adding a
section 210(m), allowing the termination and reinstatement of an
electric utilitys obligation to purchase and sell energy and
capacity to/from QFs.
There is a reduction in the
number of respondents from 860 to seven. Over the past three years,
the Commission received an average of seven filings per year thus
warranting this reduction. The original figure used by the
Commission was based on number of respondents in the universe, not
the number of filers. Through the last three years, the Commission
received an average of seven filings per year. With that historical
information, the Commission can now justify the reduction from 860
to seven filings per year and the resulting decrease in the total
annual burden. The increase in the hours of burden per filing to
12-13 hours (up from the estimated 3.27 hours [described in the
supporting statement for the final rule in Docket RM06-10,
10/2006]) results from a review of the actual filings and an
estimate of the required time for completion. FERC received no
comments during the 60-day comment period on the burden estimates.
Industry cost estimates were included in the previous supporting
statement but were not included in OMB's ROCIS. For this submittal,
they are included in both the supporting statement and OMB's
ROCIS.
$39,969
No
No
Uncollected
Uncollected
No
Uncollected
Patricia Morris 202
208-6990
No
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.