Download:
pdf |
pdf~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
ENVIRONME
61NA
/L
MDE
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE
1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230
410-537-3000,1-800-633-6101
FILED
OFl.~ii[.~ l / l h . 'll
lvlsr~ O'M~-,y
IIIL.
Shati T. Wilson
C;:~ : i T ' f ' !
Secretary
Governor
Z:.~ ','..'J 29 A t~. 3b
AnfllonyG. Brown
LieutenantGovernor
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D.
IX.p~ySecretary
FEES? ,!. ~: I Z£" ~I2 '(
RE£gL.:::;" i[''" :;''' :; F-:,!~r
May 22, 2009
Ms. Kimberly D. Bose
Secretary
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Washington, D.C. 20426
Re:
AES Sparrows Point LNG
Request for Transmittal of Administrative Record
Consolidated Record CP07-0062
Dear SecretaryBose:
In response to your letter dated May 15, 2009, enclosed please find (i) a copy of the Maryland Department
of the Environment's denial of water quafity certification under § 401 of the Clean Water Act; and (2) an
index by FERC Accession number identifying all documents and materials that comprise the consolidated
administrative record in this matter. All of the documents and materials included in the index are found in
FERC Docket CP07-62 and can be accessed at http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/docketsheet.a~p.
If you have any questions concerning the Department's filing of the record index, please do not hesitate to
call Adam D. Snyder, Assistant Attorney General, at (410) 537-3034. He will be representing the
Deparmlent in this matter and should be able to answer any questions you may have.
Secretary
cc:
•~
EiderGhigiarelli
II
P.m~dedPiper
P
m
www.mde.state.md.us
rnf ~
w ~
l-soo-rss-~.ss
ac~yserv~
~0090603-0005
FERC
/
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C.204~
May 15, 2009
The Honorable Shari T. Wilson
Maryland Department of the Environment
1800 Washington Blvd.
Baltimore, MD 21230
Re: AES Sparrows Point LNG, request for transmittal of adminisln~vc reoord
Dear Secretary Wilson:
On May 8, 2009, AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express,
L.L.C. (collectively, AES) filed a petition for review with the United States Court of
Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Docket No. 09-1539) for review of the Maryland
Department of the Environment's April 24, 2009 denial of AES's request for a Water
Quality Certification under Section 401(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1341(a).
Pursuant to 18 C.F.R. § 385.2014, your agency is responsible for submitting to the
FERC, within 30 days of your April 24, 2009 decision: (1) a copy of any final dccisiop
or action; (2) an index identifying all docume~ats and materials - including pleadings,
comments, evidence, exhibits, testimony, project alternatives, studies, and maps -relied
upon by the agcncy or official in reaching a decision or action; and (3) the designation
"consolidated record" and the docket numbcx for the Commission proceeding applicable
to the requested Federal authorization. The FERC will thc~ mmsmit the index to record
to the Fourth Circuit by the court-ordcxed deadline (June 22, 2009).
If you have any question concerning the timing or substance of your record filing
responsibility) please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
CC:
Elder Ghigiarelli, Deputy Administrator for the Feda'al Consistency Coordinator
for the Maryland Department of the Environment
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Total Maximum Daily Loads of Nitrogen and Phosphorus for
the Baltimore Harbor in
Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll and Howard Counties and
Baltimore City, Maryland
FINAL
DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 540
Baltimore MD 21230-1718
Submitted to:
Watershed Protection Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
December 2006
EPA Submittal Date: December 14, 2006
EPA Approval Date: December 17, 2007
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient rMDL
Documentversion: December 14, 2006
~X[~Pl~r
|
0090603-0005
FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL.
Table of Contents
List o f Figures .................................................................................................................................
i
List o f Table
i
..................................................................................................................................
List o f A bbreviations ......................................................................................................................
ii
EXECUTIVE
iii
S U M M A R Y . ...........................................................................................................
1.0
INTRODUCTION
............................................................................................................
2.0
SETTING AND WATER QUALITY DESCRIPTION
I
...................................................
2
2.1 General Setting and Source A&sessment ..................................................................
2. I.I Watershed Description ...................................................................................
2.1.2 Land Use ........................................................................................................
2.1.3 G e o l o g y ..........................................................................................................
2.1.4 Nutrients Source A s s e s s m e n t .........................................................................
2.1.4. I Point Sources: Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plant
Loads .......................................................................................................................
2.1.4.2 Nonpoint Source l.oads and Urban S t o r m ~ a t e r l.oads ..............................
2
2
4
6
6
2.2 Water Quality. Characterization ..............................................................................
9
2.3 Water QualiD Impairment .....................................................................................
2.3.1 Dissolved O x y g e n Criteria ...........................................................................
2.3.2 Chlorophyll a Criteria ..................................................................................
13
14
14
6
g
3.0
TARGETED WATER QUA L I T Y GOAL ....................................................................... 15
4.0
TOTAL MAXIMUM
DAIL Y LOADS DEVELOPMENTAND
ALLOCATION
........ 15
4.1 O v e r v i e w ...................................................................................................................
15
4.2 Analysis F r a m e w o r k ...............................................................................................
4.2. I C o m p u t e r Modeling F r a m e ~ ork ..................................................................
4.2.1. I Eutrophication Model Calibration ............................................................
4.2.2 T M I ) L Analysis F r a m e w o r k ........................................................................
4.2.2. I Dissolved O x y g e n Analytical F r a m e w o r k ................................................
4.2.2.2 Chlorophyll a Analytical F r a m e w o r k .......................................................
15
15
17
18
18
20
4.3 Scenario Descriptions and Results .........................................................................
20
4.3.1 Baseline Conditions Scenario ......................................................................
20
4.3.2 Baseline Conditions Scenario Results .........................................................
21
4.3.2.1 Dissolved O x y g e n A s s e s s m e n t o f the Baseline Conditions Scenario ...... 22
4.3.2.2 Chlorophyll a A s s e s s m e n t for the Baseline Conditions Scenario ............ 24
4.3.3 M a x i m u m Anthropogenic Reduction from Baltimore Harbor Scenario ..... 24
4.3.4 M a x i m u m Anthropogenic Reduction Scenario Results ...............................
24
4.3.5 Future Conditions ( T M D L ) Scenario ...........................................................
25
4.3.6 Future Conditions ( T M D I . ) Scenario Results ..............................................
26
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient T M D I ,
Document v~rsion: December 14, 2006
20090603-0005
FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
4.3.6.1 Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Attainment Assessment of the Future
Conditions (TMDL) Scenario ...............................................................................
28
4.3.6.2 Chlorophyll a Criteria Attainment Assessment of the Future Conditions
(TMDI.) Scenario ..................................................................................................
29
4.4 TMDL Loading Caps ..............................................................................................
30
4.5 Load Allocations Belween Point Sources and Nonpoint Sources ....................... 30
4.5.1 Growing Season TMDL Allocations ...........................................................
4.5.2 Average Annual TMDL Allocations ..........................................................
5.0
30
32
4.6 Margin of Safe .ly (MOS) ........................................................................................
33
4.7 S u m m a r y of Total M a x i m u m Daily Loads ..........................................................
35
A S S U R A N C E O F I M P L E M E N T A T I O N .....................................................................
36
R E F E R E N C E S ............................................................................................................................
39
A P P E N D I X A: Baseline Scenario Dissolved Oxygen Criteria
A ttainment Assessment. ..................................................................................................
AI
A P P E N D I X B: TMDL Scenario Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Attainment Assessment .............. B I
A P P E N D I X C: Potential TMDL Allocations by Source Category ............................................
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
CI
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
last of Figures
Figure I: Location Map o f Baltimore Harbor Drainage Basin ......................................................
3
Figure 2: Predominant Land Uses in the Watershed Draining into Baltimore Harbor .................. 5
Figure 3: Proportions o f Land Use in the Basins [)raining into Baltimore Harbor ....................... 6
Figure 4: Percentages of Average Annual Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads from Municipal and
Industrial Point Sources, Urban Stonnwater and NPS in Baltimore Ilarbor, 1995- 1997 ....... 9
Figure 5: Location of Water Quality Stations in Baltimore Harbor ............................................
II
Figure 6: Time Series of Chlorophyll a Data at Baltimore Harbor Station WT5.1 / M I6 .......... 12
Figure 7: Time Series o f DO Data at Baltimore Harbor Station WT 5.1 / M I6 .......................... 13
Figure 8: Time Series of Model Calibration Results of DO in Harbor Station WT5.1 ............... 17
Figure 9: Time Series of Model Calibration Results o f Chl a in Harbor Station WT5.1 ............ 18
Figure 10: Cumulative Frequency Distribution curve representing an approximately 10 percent
allowable exceedance equally distributed betv, een time and space (EPA. 2003) ................ 19
Figure I I: Time Series of Model Results for the Baseline Conditions Scenario for DO in
Baltimore Harbor Station WT5. I ..........................................................................................
2I
Figure 12: Model Results for the Baseline Conditions Scenario for Chl a in Bahimore Harbor
Station WT5.1 .......................................................................................................................
22
Figure 13: Maximum Anthropogenic Reduction Scenario model results for DO levels in surface
and bottom v.aters in Baltimore Ilarbor at Station WT5.1 ...................................................
25
Figure 14: Time Series of Model Results for the TMDL Scenario for DO at Station WT5.1 .... 27
Figure 15: Time Series o f Model Results tbr the TMI)I, Scenario for Chl a at Station WT5.1 . 27
List of Tables
Table I: Baltimore Harbor Subwatershed Areas Within Maryland Jurisdictions .......................... 4
Table 2: Baltimore Harbor Subwatershed Areas ............................................................................
4
7
Table 3: Average Municipal WWTP l,oads, 1992- 1997 ................................................................
Table 4: Average Industrial WWTP Loads, 1992-1997 .................................................................
7
Table 5: Average Daily Flows for Permitted Point Sources Discharging into Baltimore Ilarbor
during the 1992- 1997 Model Calibration Period ....................................................................
7
Table 6: Dissolved Ox'.gen Criteria and Time Periods tbr the Designated Use Subcategories ... 14
Table 7: Baseline Conditions Scenario: Percent Nonattainment of Dissolved Oxygen Criteria in
the Baltimore ltarbor ............................................................................................................
23
Table 8: TMDI., Scenario: Percent Nonattainmcnt o f Dissolved Oxygen Criteria in the Baltimore
Itarbor ...................................................................................................................................
29
Table 9: Growing Season Allocations ..........................................................................................
32
Table 10: Average Annual Allocations .........................................................................................
33
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMD[,
Document version: December 14, 2006
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
FINAl,
BHI'M
BMPs
BNR
CBP
CE-QUAL-ICM
CEWES
CFD
C113D-WES
Chl a
COMAR
CTIC
CWA
DMCF
DO
ENR
EPA
iISPF
FSA
IS(;
I.A
Ibs/yr
MD
MDA
MDE
MDP
rag/1 / p.g/I
mgd
MOS
MS4
NOAA
NPDES
N PS
PATMH
PCBs
TMDL
"IN
TP
WLA
WQIA
WQLS
WWTP
List of Abbreviations
Baltimore Ilarbor t'utrophication Mode
Best Management Practices
Biological Nutrient Removal
Chesapeake Bay Program
Corps of Fngineers Water Quality Integrated Compartment Mode
Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Stations
Cumulative Frequency Distribution
Curvilinear l lydrodynamics in Three Dimensions - Waterways Experiment
Stations
Active Chlorophyll a
Code of Maryland Regulations
Conservation Technology Information Center
Clean Water Act
Dredged Material Containment Facility
Dissolved Oxygen
Enhanced Nutrient Removal
Environmental Protection Agency
Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran
Farm Service Agency
International Steel Group
l.oad Allocation
Pounds per Year
Maryland
Maryland Department of Agriculture
Mao'land Department of the Environment
Maryland Department of Planning
Milligrams per Liter / Micrograms per I,iter
Million Gallons per Da)
Margin of Safety
Municipal Separate Storrnwater Sewer System
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Nonpoint Source
Patapsco River Mesohaline Stream Segment
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Total Maximum Daily l.oad
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Wasteload Allocation
Water Quality Improvement Act
Water Quality Limited Segment
Waste Water Treatment Plant
Baltimore Ilarbor Nutrient T M D I .
Document version: December 14. 2006
ii
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Upon approval by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) this document will establish
Total Maximum l)aily l.oads for nitrogen and phosphorus in the Patapseo River Mesohaline
Stream Segment - PATMH (not including Bodkin Creek). Ilereaf'ler this stream segment will be
referred to as the Baltimore Harbor or the t larbor (basin number 02130903). The Baltimore
Harbor drains into the Chesapeake Bay and is part of the Patapsco/Back River Tributary Strategy
Basin.
Baltimore ltarbor (basin number 02130903) was identified on the State's 1996 list of water
quality limited segments (WQLSs) submitted to the U.S. EPA by the MaD'land Department of
the Environment (MDE) as impaired b) nutrients. The Baltimore ltarbor has also been
identified on the 303(d) list as impaired by bacteria (fecal coliform) (1998), toxics
(polychlorinated biphenvls, or PCBs) (1998), metals (chromium. zinc and lead) (1998),
suspended sediments (1996), and impacts to biological communities (2004). These other
impairments will be addressed separately. The TMDI.s described within this document were
developed to address the water quality impairments associated with excess nutrient Ioadings.
The TMDLs for the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus ,.,,'ere determined using a time-variable,
three-dimensional water quality eutrophication model package, which includes a watershed
model (Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran (lISPF)), a hydrodynamic model (Curvilinear
I lydrodynamic in Three Dimensions (CH3D)), a '*ater quality model (Corps of Fngineers-Water
Quality-Integrated Compartment Model (CE.-QUAL-ICM)), and a sediment flux model.
I.oading caps for total nitrogen and total phosphorus entering the Baltimore Harbor are
established for growing season conditions and for average annual flow conditions.
To assure that critical conditions are addressed, the growing season TMDL for nitrogen is
2,145,750 Ibs/growing season, and the growing season TMDI. for phosphorus is 149,152
Ibs/grov, ing season. These TMDLs apply from May I through October 3 I. The allowable loads
have been allocated betv, een point and nonpoint sources. The nonpoint sources arc allocated
459,912 Ibs/growing season of total nitrogen, and 12,776 Ibs/growing season of total phosphorus.
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination S3,stem (NPDES) point sources, including
municipal wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) loads, NPDES industrial discharge loads and
NPDES regulated urban storm`.`.'ater loads, are allocated 1,642,014 Ibslgrowing season of
nitrogen, and 113,212 Ibs/grov,'ing season of phosphorus. A future allocation (FA) load to
account for future growth and an explicit margin of safety comprises the remainder of the
nitrogen and phosphorus allocations.
The average annual TMDI. for nitrogen is 5,323,963 Ibs/).ear, and the average annual TMDL for
phosphorus is 324,309 Ibs/year. The allo`.sable loads have been allocated betv, een point and
nonpoint sources. The nonpoint source loads are allocated 1,246,036 Ibs/year of total nitrogen
and 34,654 Ibs/).ear of total phosphorus. The point sources, includingNPDES WWTP loads,
NPDES industrial discharge loads and NPDF'S urban stormwater loads, are allocated 3,976,215
Ibs/year of total nitrogen and 243,127 Ibs/year of total phosphorus. A future allocation (FA) load
to account for future growth and an explicit margin of safeb' comprises the remainder of the
nitrogen and phosphorus allocations.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
iii
zuu~u6u3-uuo5
FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.,
Several legislative and policy-derived programs will be utilized to implement these TMDLs.
First, NPDES permits will reflect TMDL Ioadings as they are renewed. Additionally, the
Chesapeake Bay Restoration Fund will be used to finance Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR)
upgrades to WW'|'Ps discharging into the Baltimore |larbor. Second, Maryland has several wellestablished programs to draw upon, including Maryland's Tributary Strategies for Nutrient
Reductions, developed in accordance with the Chesapeake Bay 2000 Agreement. Third,
Maryland's Water QualiD' Improvement Act (WQIA) of 1998 requires that nutrient management
plans be implemented for all agricultural lands throughout Maryland. Finally. Maryland has
adopted a watershed cycling strategy, which will ensure that future monitoring and water quality
evaluations are conducted.
The water quality goal of these TMDLs is to reduce excessive algal blooms that result in high
chlorophyll a concentrations, and maintain the dissolved oxygen concentrations at levels above
the water quality criteria for the specific designated uses of the Baltimore ttarbor. MDE has
described the legislative and policy-derived programs that will result in significant nutrient
reductions and the achievement of water quality standards for all designated uses in the
Baltimore Harbor except the Deep Channel.
Based on information generated in the TMDL analysis, MDE is unable to ensure that the Dcep
Channel Refuge designated use water quality criterion tbr dissolved oxygen can be met at all
times that it is applicable. The regions to which the Deep Channel Reluge designated use applies
represent approximately 10% of the area of the Harbor. These regions include the main
navigation channel of the Ilarbor, the channels into Curtis Bay, Middle Branch, and Northwest
Branch and associated anchorages (COMAR 26.08.02.08). The region subject to potential now
attainment is in the main shipping channel, from the mouth of the ltarbor to Fort McHenry, and
represents < 5% of the area of the Harbor. The volume of water that does not meet the dissolved
oxygen criteria represents approximately 3% of the total volume of the Harbor.
The reason that the designated use cannot be fully attained is due to the deepening of the natural
river channel into a navigation channel that began in 1836 and continues today. In the past 170
)'ears the dredging effort has incrementally deepened and expanded the size of the channels and
their associated turning basins and anchorages. As a result, the channels and the water that flows
within them, has been hydrologically modified. In a portion of the main navigation channel,
from the mouth of the tlarbor to Fort McHenD', it has been observed that water from the upper
portion of the water column does not mix with the lower portion of the water column. This
observed stratification of the w'ater column, and the lack of mixing associated with it. occurs
ever),' spring/summer/fall. As a result, there is a limited region within the navigation channel that
does not meet the dissolved oxygen criteria during the observed spring/summer/fall stratification
period. Additionally, a computer model simulation was conducted that removed all
anthropogenic sources of nutrients to the system and returned the watershed to a forest. Even
under these conditions, the results indicated that the designated use could not be attained.
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient TMD!..
Document version: December 14, 2006
iv
10090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
i.0
INTRODUCTION
Section 303(d)(I)(C) of the federal Clean Water Act (CWA) and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agencs's (EPA) implementing regulations direct each state to develop a Total
Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for each impaired water qualit T limited segment (WQI.S) on the
Section 303(d) list, taking into account seasonal variations and a protective margin of safety
(MOS) to account [br uncertainty. A TMDL reflects the total pollutant loading of the impairing
substance a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards.
TMDI,s are established to achieve and maintain water quality standards. A water quality standard
is the combination of a designated use for a particular body of water and the water quality criteria
designed to protect that use. Designated uses for the Patapsco River Mesohaline Stream Segment
- PATMH (hereafter referred to as the Baltimore Harbor or the Harbor) are: (1) Migratory Fish
Spawning and Nurser':', (2) Seasonal Shallow Water Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, (3) ()pen
Water Fish and Shellfish ltabitat, (4) Deep Water Seasonal Fish and Shellfish Ilabitat, and (5)
Deep Channel. Water quality criteria consist of narrative statements and numeric values designed
to protect the designated uses. Criteria differ among waters with different designated uses.
The Baltimore l larbor (basin number 02130903) w.as first identified on the 1996 303(d) list
submitted to EPA by the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDF). It was listed as
impaired by nutrients due to signs of eutrophication, expressed as high levels of chlorophyll a
(Cht a) and low concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO). Eutrophication is the over-enrichment
of aquatic s)stems by excessive inputs ofnutrients (nitrogen and/or phosphorus). The nutrients
act as a fertilizer leading to excessive growth of algae. The algae die and are eventually
consumed by bacteria. During the consumption process the bacteria utilize the available DO,
~hich resuhs in decreased DO concentrations in the water column particularly v, hen stratification
or layering prevents oxygen in the surtace layers from mixing with deeper la~ers. Tberelbre.
MI)E uses measures of DO and Chl a to understand the impact of the nitrogen and phosphorus on
the ecosystem. For these reasons, this document, upon EPA approval, establishes TMDI,s for the
nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus in the Baltimore Ilarbor.
The Baltimore Harbor has also been identified on the 303(d) list as impaired by bacteria (fecal
coliform) (1998), toxics (polyehlorinated bipbenyls (PCBs) (1998), metals (chromium (Cr), zinc
(Zn), and lead (Pb)) (1998). suspended sediments (1996), and impacts to biological communities
(2004). To date, Cr and Zn impairments in Bear Creek and the Inner 1larbor/Northwest Branch
and Pb in the Inner Harbor/Northwest Branch have been addressed with water quality analyses.
]''he remaining impairments will be addressed separately.
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: December 14, 2006
I
ZUU~UbUJ--UUUb
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
2.0
SETTING AND WATER QUALITY DESCRIPTION
2.1 General Setting and Source Assessment
2.1.1 Watershed Description
The watershed draining into the Baltimore Harbor estuary is the Patapsco River Watershed. The
Patapsco River Watershed is located in the western shore region of Maryland (Figure 1), and
includes the mainstem Patapsco and the tributaries of Jones Falls, Gwynns Falls, Colgate Creek,
Bear Creek, Curtis Creek, Stony Creek, and Rock Creek. The Patapsco River Mesohaline
(PATMH) segment, or Baltimore llarbor estuary, is located on the west side of the upper
Chesapeake Bay about 160 miles from the Virginia Capes at the entrance to the Bay. The Ilarbor
estuary is the 15-mile tidal region of the lower Patapsco River. It is the end of the Patapsco River
where it joins the Chesapeake Bay. The PATMH segment includes the Baltimore Harbor estuary
and the tidal segments of the Colgate Creek, Bear Creek, Curtis Creek, Stony Creek, Rock Creek
and Bodkin Creek tributaries. Bodkin Creek is identified in the 303(d) list as a separate
waterbody and will be addressed in the future.
Natural water depths in the l-larlyorare generally less than 20 feet except for the main navigation
channel maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, which is maintained at a depth of 50
feet. The tidal range in the Harbor is approximately one loot. Other than the Patapsco River, the
only sizable tributaries entering the Harbor directly are Jones Falls and Gwynns Falls.
The Jones Falls, Gwynns Falls and Patapsco River discharge into the Baltimore Harbor. The
South Branch and mainstem of the Patapsco River flows about 85 miles (134 kin) from Parr's
Spring in Carroll County to the Middle Branch. The North Branch, formed at the confluence of
the East Branch and West Branch, flows into Libcr~' Reservoir where it is retained for drinking
water purposes. A small segment of the North Branch exists below the dam and joins the South
Branch near the ]'own of Sykesville. After flowing through Baltimore Harbor, the Patapsco River
discharges into the Chesapeake Bay.
The subwatersheds draining into the Harbor are located within Baltimore Cib' and Baltimore,
Anne Arundel, Carroll, and Howard Counties. The total area of these subwatersheds is 268,671
acres (I,087 square kilometers), excluding the land area above Liberty Reservoir. Water from the
subwatershed draining into Liberty Reservoir typically does not drain to the Baltimore Harbor
because it is used for drinking water.
Table I shows the area in acres that the Patapsco River watershed (not including Liberty
Reservoir watershed) occupies in each of the above counties. Fable 2 shows the area in acres for
each of the four major subwatersheds draining into the Baltimore Harbor estuary.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
2
0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
05/29/2009
(Unofficial)
FINAl.
r
le¢ltJll
ef t h e P I t a p s e e ~ v e r W s t e r s k e d
t h e S t a t e of M l r ~ I i |
L e c I ~ e = ef t h e R I ~ i e r e
Hither
in t h e P I t l p S C e R ~ i r W i t e r s b e d
N
Baltimore
County
Carroll
County
\
LEGEND
/^,/Highways
CoJnty Boundaries
~ - ~ Ba~lmore Harbor
•
I
Baltimore
Courtw
!
~-"
-..
/
E Z Patap~co~ e , ~al~,~a
Palap=co~rver
(
•
~,4.5
Anne Arur
County,
,
/
0
=__
4
e
I
12
8
t2
~G
20
16
N~Ill
,
2d
DltDl'ed by
;dlrVt4nd Oe~mrtr~e~tof the E nvttonment
1800 W4srmGtor ~OuleV4¢~
B41~ore. U~ 21230
ikd4~ PtO~oCtJOr Date J a n u a t ¥ 2 7 . 2 0 C 3
Wjt~l~.~eds
~lD Olpl
C
ountvO4t4
SoutelIDo.nd41itf
kid oeN4tut41Reso~lees
DIpaltmlht ot theCE~v=:onm¢
e t '•
i Stte4ms EPA
Roads StJt¢ H @ht~#¥Admm~tl~on
Figure I: Location Map of Baltimore Ilarbor Drainage Basin
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: December 14, 2006
.
3
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
"Fable I: Baltimore Harbor Subwatershed Areas Within Maryland Jurisdictions
Jurisdictions
Area (acres)
Anne Arundel County'
46,223
Baltimore City
40.476
Baltimore County
100,600
Carroll Count':'
40,182
l foward County.
41,190
Total
268,671
Table 2: Baltimore Harbor Subwatcrshed Areas
Subwatersheds
Area (acres)
Gwynns Falls
41,70 I
Jones Falls
37,273
Patapsco River
130,662
Baltimore Harbor
59,035
Total
268,671
2.1.2 Land Use
The land use in the Baltimore Harbor watershed is diverse. The land cover consists of urban,
suburban, rural, industrial, forest, and agricultural land uses. One of the largest forested areas in
the watershed is the Patapsco Valley State Park.
The watershed draining into the Baltimore Harbor (not including the watershed draining into the
Liberty Reservoir) has an area of approximately 268,671 acres (1,087.3 square kilometers). The
land uses in the watershed consist of" tbrest and other herbaceous growth (77,077 acres or 29%),
mixed agriculture (41,848 acres or 15%), water (I,806 acres or I%), and urban (147,940 acres or
55%). Land use information was derived from the 1997 Maryland Department of" Planning
(MDP) land cover database, the Farm Service Agency (FSA), the 1997 Agricultural Census, and
information from the 1996 Conservation Technology lnfbrmation Center (CTIC). See Figure 2
for the predominant land uses in the Baltimore tlarbor watersheds. Figure 3 shows the relative
amounts ofdillerent land uses in the watersheds draining into the Baltimore Harbor.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14. 2006
4
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
05/29/2009
(Unofficial)
FINAL
Baltimore Harbor
Legend
Land Use
Est,arBh e
r o r a ~ t ~. H e , b a ¢ ~ ~,~
Ujba n
k i t e d ~.StlCult j r e
Baltimore
County
Carroll
County
~
0
0
10
t2
0
Walt f
t0
24
K Uer'~eters
I
Prepared Ry
)atJ Seurces
81S.h MD ~t*te 'Je'atltsheds
.an4 U st
MD D tp&rtmtht
~
/
-
-
kl41vi4nd D Q p a ~ l m e h t o , t h e E n v r : n r r e n t
l O C O V % ' a l n n o t o n 81vd S ! # ~ 4 ~
Balimote. kdlrvIJnd 21230
kll o Produ¢l]onDate
Se~ter~t,24
¢~f p l d h h l n 0
2~03
Figure 2: Predominant Land Uses in the Watershed Draining into Baltimore Harbor
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14. 2006
5
zuu~u6o3-oo05
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Mixed
Agriculture
15%
Forest and Other
Herbaceous - 2 9 %
Water
1%
Figure 3: Proportions of Land Use in the Basins Draining into Baltimore Harbor
2.1.3 Geology
The watersheds draining into the Baltimore Harbor lie primarily within the Piedmont and, to a
lesser extent, the Coastal Plain provinces of Central Maryland. The surficial geology is
characterized by crystalline rocks of volcanic and sedimentary origin, consisting primarily of
schist and gneiss. These formations are resistant to short-term erosion, and often determine the
limits of stream bank and streambed. Crystalline formations decrease in elevation from northwest
to southeast, eventually extending beneath the younger sediments of the Coastal Plain. The fall
line represents the transition between the Atlantic Coastal Plain Province and the Piedmont
Province. The Atlantic Coastal Plain surficial geology is characterized by thick, unconsolidated
marine sediments deposited over the crystalline rock formations of the Piedmont Province
(Coastal Environmental Services, 1995). "
2.1.4 Nutrients Source Assessment
2.1.4.1 Point Sources: Municipal and Industrial Wastewater
Treatment Plant Loads
The Patapsco Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and Cox Creek WWTP are municipal point
sources that discharge directly into Baltimore Itarbor. International Steel Group (ISG). Grace
Davison, Erachem-Comilog, US Gypsum, and Millenium Specialty are the five industrial point
sources that discharge directly into the Harbor. The combined estimated average annual loads
from municipal W W T P s for 1992- 1997 (the model calibration period) are 3,455,063 Ibs/yr for
total nitrogen (TN) and 216,099 lbs/yr for total phosphorus (TP). The combined estimated
average annual loads from industrial WWTPs for 1992-1997 are 3,001,015 Ibs/yr for TN and
89,376 Ibs/b,rfor TP. Thus, the total average annual loads from all WWTPS are 6,456,078 Ibs/yr
for TN and 305,475 Ibs/yr lbr TP. This inlbrmation was obtained from discharge monitoring
reports stored in MDE's point source database. The municipal average annual point source loads
for 1992-1997 are presented in Table 3. The industrial average annual point source loads for
1992-1997 are shown in Table 4. Table 5 lists the average daily flows for all permitted point
sources discharging into Baltimore Harbor during 1992-1997 in millions of gallons per day
(mgd).
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
6
0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Table 3: Avera e Municipal WWTP Loads, 1992-1997
Year
"IN
TP
Ibs/~rr
~as/yr
1992
2,762.146
207,976
1993
3,814,825
235,890
1994
5,132,577
220,309
1995
3,049,908
243,216
1996
3,059,893
221,403
1997
2,911,024
167,800
Average
3,455,063
216,099
Table 4: Aver: e Industrial WWTP Loads, 1992-1997
'IN
1"1"
Year
Ibs/>r
Ibs/yr
1992
3,506,205
93,862
1993
2,846,814
88,115
1994
2,636306
84.041
1995
2.697,273
85,333
1996
3,127,613
90,767
1997
3,191.478
94,140
Average
3,001,015
89,376
Table 5: Average Daily Flows for Permitted Point Sources Discharging into Baltimore
Harbor during the 1992-1997 Model Calibration Period
Facility
Type
Patapsco WWTP
Cox Creek WWTP
Erachem-Comilo~
Grace Davison
US GTpsum-I
US Gypsum-2
ISG-I
ISG-2
ISG-3
ISG-4
ISG-5
ISG-6
ISG-7
Millennium 001
Millennium 002
Municipal
Municipal
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Baltimore tlarbor Nutrient TMI)I.
Document version: December 14, 2006
Average Flow
(mgd)
47.96
11.18
0.089
2.38
0.001
0.000
37.34
5.66
55.42
3.60
0.064
3.94
1.51
0.067
0.589
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
These flow and point source load estimates represent actual discharge into the Baltimore Harbor
from municipal WWTPs and industrial plants from 1992-1997. It is important to note that these
plants were not all discharging at their maximum flo~ capacities and/or nutrient permit limits
during this period. For example, the Patapsco River and Cox Creek municipal WWTPs
discharged an average of 3.5 million Ibs/yr of TN and 0.22 million Ibs/yr of TP during the 19921997 study period. If these plants discharged consistently at their maximum capacity flow, their
loads could increase to 3.9 million Ibs/yr of'IN and 0.46 million Ibs/yr of TP, assuming the TN
concentration was the same as the actual 1992- 1997 concentrations and the TP concentration
equal to the current permit limit ofTP = 2.0 mg/I for both plants. Similarly, industrial facilities
loads could increase significantly if they discharged at maximum capacity for long periods of
time.
2.1.4.2 Nonpoint Source Loads and Urban Stormwater Loads
Nonpoint source loads and urban stormwater loads entering the Baltimore Harbor ~,ere estimated
using the ltydrologic Simulation Program-Fortran (IfSPF). The HSPF model is used to estimate
flows, suspended solids and nutrient loads from the watershed's sub-basins. Nonpoint source and
urban stormwater loads are linked to a three-dimensional, time-variable hydrodynamic model and
a water quality model coupled with a sediment process model designed specifically for Baltimore
Harbor. The water quality model is used to determine the maximum load of'nutrients that can
enter the I tarbor while maintaining the water quality criteria associated with its designated uses.
The v~ater quality modeling framework is shown in Section 4.2.
[ h e Baltimore Harbor HSPF watershed model used the I'bllowing assumptions: (1) variability in
patterns of precipitation were estimated from existing National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) meteorological stations; (2) hydrologic response of" land areas were
estimated for a simplified set of land uses in the basin; and (3) agricultural information, like crop
types and tilling practices, were estimated from MI)P land use data, the 1997 Agricultural Census
Data, and the Farm Service Agency (FSA) data. The HSPF simulates nonpoint source and urban
stormwater loads and integrates all natural and human-induced sources, including direct
atmospheric deposition and loads from septic tanks, which are associated with river base flow
during growing season conditions. Details of the HSPF watershed model developed to estimate
these urban and non-urban loads are found in the 'gatapsco/Back River Watershed HSPF Model
Report" (MDE, 2001).
Figure 4 presents the relative average annual amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus from nonpoint
source, municipal and industrial point source, and urban stormwater delivered Ioadings to the
Baltimore t larbor during the 1995- 1997 period.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMI)I.
Document version: December 14, 2006
8
10090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Total Nitrogen 1995-1997
Total Phosphorus 1995-1997
Mixed
Agncultuce
12%
~
m
Urban-Stormwater
12%
--
Mixed
Agncullure
F
8%
Other
~
5%
Urban-Storrnwatef
29%
Other
6%
Figure 4: Percentages of Average Annual Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loads from Municipal
and Industrial Point Sources, Urban Stormwater and NPS in Baltimore Harbor, 1995-1997
"lbe calibration of the model was conducted for the 1992- 1997 period. The TMDI. analysis was
conducted using the 1995-1997 period as a baseline, which includes dr3,, wet and average years.
For these reasons, the delivered loads percentages in the figures represent an average for the
1995- 1997 period.
In the Baltimore l larbor watershed, the estimated 1905-1997 average annual "IN delivered load
from nonpoint sources (NPS) is 1,364.400 Ibs/yr. and the NPS TP delivered load is 37.465 Ibs/yr.
The estimated 1995-1997 average annual TN load for point sources, including regulated urban
stormwater TN load, is 7,053,689 Ibs/yr and the estimated 1995-1997 average annual point source
TP load is 317.423 Ibs/yr.
2.2 Water Quality Characterization
Eutrophication is the over-enrichment of aquatic systems by excessive inputs of nutrients
(nitrogen and/or phosphorus). The nutrients act as a fertilizer leading to excessive growth of
algae. The algae grow rapidly, die and are subsequently consumed by bacteria. The bacterial
consumption of the algae results in the use of available dissolved oxygen in the water column,
which produces hypoxic (low oxygen) or anoxic (no oxygen) conditions. Eutrophication has
probably been more extensively studied in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries than in an',
other coastal ecosystem. Scientists have uncovered the relationships ofhov~ nutrients stimulate
biological productivity in the Bay. and how eutrophicationresults in oxygen depletion, increased
turbidity, loss of submersed vegetation, and alteration of food webs (Boesch et al.. 2001).
Portions of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries often shov, signs of eutrophication. The
Baltimore Harbor has sho~',n clear indications ofeutrophication for several decades (Robertson,
1977: Magnien et al.. 1993: Boynton et al.. 1998). For example, extensive and persistent anoxic
or h',poxic conditions were observed regularly in the bottom ,.~,aters of the Baltimore Ilarbor.
The Chesapeake Ba? Water Quality Monitoring Program has recorded measurements in the
Bahimore Harbor indicating anoxic and hypoxic events occur as early as April and extend until
October every )ear. Also. increased algal blooms have been found to occur yearly during the
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient rMD[,
l)ocumcnt version: December 14, 2006
9
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
warm season (Wang et al,, 2004). Anoxic conditions occur at the bottom of the navigation
channel as well as in most tributaries, such as the Inner Harbor and the Middle Branch. Anoxic
v, ater exists in the mainstem of the Chesapeake Bay each summer. However, Wang et al (2004)
and I,iu (2002) hypothesize that the origin of low DO in the I larbor is not from the intrusion of
anoxic Bay water, but rather is an internal process of the Harbor.
Wang et al,. (2004) indicate that the water circulation and exchange within the Baltimore Harbor
region are generally regulated by local wind forces, which overwhelm the weak currents driven
by river and tidal fbrces. Pritchard and Carpenter (1960) inferred the existence of a three-layered
circulation in Baltimore Harbor based on salinity and dye distributions. This was confirmed by
Boicourt and Olson (1982) with direct measurements. This unique hydrodynamic feature has to
be taken into consideration because it can affect the dynamics of water quality parameters.
Data Ibr the 1992- 1997 period have been selected for the development of the eutrophication
model and the subsequent nutrient TMDI, analyses. There are 24 water quality stations located in
the Baltimore tlarbor that MDE and the Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) surveyed during the
model calibration period. The reader is referred to Figure 5 fbr the locations of the water quality
sampling stations.
The CBP has sponsored a long-term water quality sampling station (WT5.1) in the Baltimore
Ilarbor since 1984 to monitor its physical, chemical, and biological parameters. MDE also
monitored the Baltimore Harbor intensively at the other 23 stations during the period March 1994
to May 1995 lbr parameters similar to those monitored by the CBP. A detailed list of all
parameters measured in these surveys can be found in the report "'The Development of a Water
Quality Model for Baltimore Harbor, Back River and the Adjacent Upper Chesapeake Bay"
(Wang et al.. 2004).
The time series data for dissolved oxygen (DO) and chlorophyll a (Chl a) at stations WT5.1 and
M I6 are presented in this report to provide a trend analysis of the two parameters associated with
Maryland water quality standards. Additional time series and longitudinal data profiles from the
MDE and CBP stations lbr various nutrient parameters are available upon request and through the
MDE TMDI, website as supporting documentation. The time series data files are too large to
incorporate as appendices to this report.
Baltimore Ilarbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
10
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
~E~END
•
I ~ d Idm C ~ k
CBP WTS.I
•
MDE
2
0
4
6
8 MtI~
I
Stalbm;
~
Ba~bRet~ HaHI o r
Bahta4en) H t d l e r W i t e r ~ k e d
[ ~
8ackRker
O
2
4
pat8 Sources
~4tetshtd$
~[J D*~t of N a t u t t l R e s ¢ . J r C e s
• -.~ - ~____
CeJnl~ ~ouqd~l~l(t$ M~ Dt~l~f~t*lt ottht En~ltonment
S~taml EPA
RoJds SUtte H ~h~Ay A(Imml|ttatlon
,J-¥J[J-J~'"
6
,
R
10 K " - m e t e r s
P r e P a r e d o~
klafyLInd Department of I~e £ a'qro~ mt ~t
1 ~ WJ|h noton ~ou ev4~d
M , p Pfcducho. ~ t l
January 12 2004
Figure 5: Location of Water Quality Stations in Baltimore ltarbor
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
II
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Figure 6 presents the time series of Chl a concentrations in the Baltimore tlarbor from JanuaO'
1992 to December 1997 lbr the CBP long-term monitoring station WT5.1 (MDE Station MI6)
located in the middle of the Harbor, approximately 8.8 km from the ltarbor's mouth.
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
u160 ,11
20D
0
i
rio
R
D
90~
=m m
0
t¢
~i~ n ~Jmmi
D
ZOO
•
Itl
...i
. . . . . . . . .
BOTTOM
~50
CM
Ii
100
.-L
Z
(.I
x
50
Q
g
IJii
II
0
X
...~t~5
730
11:,@.5
1~ 0
OVk~ SR4K~E JANUARY I 19@2
IB2.~
2190
C B P Observed Chloroph} il a I)m~*
iVlDE f)bser,ed Chlorophyll a l)ata
Figure 6: Time Series of Chlorophyll a Data at Baltimore Harbor Station WT5.1 / MI6
As Figure 6 shows, surface Chl a concentrations include observations that are above 50 lag/I every
year, with a seasonal pattern of higher values during warmer months and lower values during
colder months. Concentrations rarely exceed 100 I.tg/I, except in the summers of 1994 and 1995
when maximum concentrations were close to 200 I.tg/l. Bottom Chl a is normally below 20 p.g/I,
except during the springs of 1995 and 1996 where concentrations reached 100 p.,g/I and 85 ~g/I,
respectively (probably weather-related, as several snowstorms may have resulted in unusual
patterns of thermal stratification).
A time series for surface and bottom DO concentrations at station WT5.1 is depicted in Figure 7,
showing that the observed surface I)O levels did not fall belong, 5.0 mg/I. The surface I3,O ranged
from 5.2 mg/I to 18.0 mg/I w'ith average DO concentrations around 10 mg/I. There is some
degree of seasonal variation with higher DO values during winter months and lower values during
summer months, due to seasonal changes in temperature. The bottom water DO concentrations
range ti'om 0 mg/I to 11 mg/I and display a distinct seasonal pattern. Anoxic conditions can be
observed at the bottom waters starling as early as April in some years and lasting until the end of
summer eveo' year. During early fall, DO levels start to increase rapidly, reaching the 5.0 mg/I
level by November.
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient TMDI,
Document version: December 14, 2006
12
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
U16(WTS,1
SURFACE
20
II
15
X
•
I
N
II wK
E
It
• w,,,,,=,,w'
10
(:3
o
m
5
BO~0~
2O
15
10
o
o
•
EZ W
~11)=
",'
5
•
ii
'Ill
w
o'i t'
, jm
c,
wW
W
O
.
0
•
"~.-~. , ., •
• • .'?~'~
365
~
. . . . . . . .
7_x~
i ..........
1095
DAYS S~NCE J A N U / ~ Y
X
CBP Obscr,,cd DO Data
O
~,IDEObscr, ed DO Data
I "~,,,,,~,iiii=
e,,LIL~=
i ..........
1460
1(]25
219D
1 1992
Figure 7: Time Series of DO Data at Baltimore Harbor Station W T 5.1 / MI6
2.3 Water Quality Impairment
The Maryland Water Quality Standards Stream Segment Designation [Code of Mar},land
Regulations (COMAR) 26.08.02.08K(2)(b)] for the Patapsco River Mesohaline (PATMH) (not
including Bodkin Creek) is Use Ih Tidal Waters: Support of Estuarinc and Marine Aquatic Life
and Shellfish Harvesting. Designated Uses present in the Baltimore Harbor Segment arc: I)
Migratory Spassning and Nursery, 2) Shallow Water Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, 3) Open
Water Fish and Shellfish, 4) Seasonal Deep Water Fish and Shellfish, and 5) Deep Channel. No
areas in the Harbor are designated as Shellfish Ilan, est Use areas.
The designated uses described above and the associated criteria are the result of MI)E's adoption
ofwater quality standards developed by tbe Cbesapeake Bay Program. MDI" adopted the
standards in the fall of 2005 and the Baltimore Harbor TMD[, represents the second application of
these standards to Maryland's estuarine waters.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: December 14, 2006
13
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
2.3.1 Dissolved Oxygen Criteria
lable 6 presents descriptions of the numeric DO criteria lot designated uses present in the
Ilarbor. The DO level is based on specific numeric criteria for Use I1 waters set forth in the
COMAR 26.08.02.03-3C(2)(8). tlowever, due to data limitations MDE will lbllow EPA
guidance and assess the DO attainment based on 30-day component of the Open Water Use
designated use for the Migratory Fish Nurser)' and Spawning Use, and Seasonal Shallow Water
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation designated uses. The Deep Water Use will also be assessed using
a 30-day methodology, however the requisite concentralion is different from the Open Water Use.
Table 6: Dissolved Oxygen ;riteria and Time Periods for the Designated Use Subcategories
Designated Use 11
Period
Dissolved Oxygen Criteria
Su bcategory
Seasonal Migratory
February 1
• Open Water criteria apply
Fish Spawning and
through May 31
inclusive
Nurser','
April I through
Seasonal Shallow
October 3 I
• Open Water criteria apply
Water Submerged
inclusive
Aquatic Vegetation
Open Water Fish and
Shellfish
Seasonal Deep Water
Fish and Shellfish
Januar) I
through
December 31
inclusive
June I through
September 30
inclusive
•
5.0 mg/I
30-day average
"
3.0 mg/I
30-day average*
June 1 through
September 30
• _> I mg/I instantaneous minimum
inclusive
• Allows a restoration variance of up to 7% applied spatially or temporally in combination
from June 1 through September 30
Seasonal Deep Channel
Refuge
2.3.2 Chlorophyll a Criteria
The Chl a concentration goal used in this analysis are based on guidelines set forth by Thomann
and Mueller (1987) and by the EPA Technical Guidance Manual for Developing Total Maximum
Daily Loads, Book 2, Part I (1997). The Chl a narrative criterion (COMAR 26.08.02.03-3C(10)
state: "Chlorophyll a - Concentrations of chlorophyll a in f~e-floating microscopic aquatic plants
(algae) shall not exceed levels that result in ecologically undesirable consequences that would
render tidal waters unsuitable for designated uses." The Thomann and Mueller guidelines
acknowledge that ""Undesirable' levels of ph~oplankton [Chl a] vary considerably depending on
water body." MDE has determined, per Thomann and Mueller, that it is acceptable to maintain
Chl a concentrations below a maximum of 100 pg/L, and to target, with some flexibility
depending on waterbody characteristics, a 30-day rolling average of approximately 50 lag/L.
Bahimore Ilarbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
14
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Consistent with the guidelines set tbrth above. MDE's interpretation of narrative criteria for Chl a
in the Baltimore [larbor is comprised of the following ',~,ater quality goals:
(I) Ensure that instantaneous concentrations remain below 100 lag/l, at all times and
(2) Minimize exceedances of the 50 lag~l,, 30-day rolling average, to a frequency that will
not result in ecologically undesirable conditions.
The water quality impairment being addressed by this TMDL analysis consists of DO
concentrations less than the numeric criteria presented in Section 2.3.1 and Chlorophyll a (Chl a)
concentrations above the MDE interpretation of the narrative criteria presented in Section 2.3.2
(See Figures 6&7). The achievement of the DO and Chl a criteria is required for all the uses
throughout the water column of the Baltimore Harbor system. In the Harbor. data are not
sufficient to assess the 7-day average and instantaneous minimum DO criteria for attainment of
the designated uses; thus, the calibrated model results are used to evaluate conditions.
3.0
TARGETED W A T E R QUALITY GOAL
The objective of the nutrient TMDLs established in this document is to ensure that DO and Chl a
concentrations in the Baltimore Harbor meet the criteria associated with specific designated uses.
Spccificall',, the TMDLs for nitrogen and phosphorus are intended to control excessive algal
growth and increase DO concentrations in areas not currently meeting water quality criteria.
4.0
TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS DEVELOPMENT AND ALLOCATION
4.1 Overview
The follm~ing sections describe the modeling frameworks for simulating nutrient loads.
hydrology, and water quality, responses. Section 4.2 summarizes the TMDI, analysis ti'amework
and model calibration. Section 4.3 describes the scenarios and results that were generated using
the modeling framework. Sections 4.4-4.5 describe how the nutrient TMDI,s and load
allocations for point sources and nonpoint sources were developed for the Baltimore Harbor.
Section 4.6 explains the rationale for the margin of safety and the last section summarizes the
TMDLs for the growing season and average annual conditions.
4.2 Analysis Framework
4.2.1 Computer Modeling Framework
To develop a TMDL. a linkage must be defined between the selected water quality targets or
goals and the identified pollutant sources. This linkage establishes the cause-and-effect
relationship between the sources of the pollutant of concern and the water quality response of the
impaired water quality segment to that pollutant. For nonpoint sources, the relationship can vary
seasonally due to factors such as precipitation. Once defined, the linkage yields the estimate of
total loading capacity or TMDL (EPA, 1999).
MDE chose a set of time-variable models as the analysis tool to link the sources of nutrient
Ioadings to the IX) criteria and chlorophyll a goal. The computational framework chosen for the
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI.
D(~ument version: December 14, 2006
15
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Baltimore Harbor nutrients TMDI,s is the three-dimensional, time-variable Baltimore Harbor
Eutrophication Model (BHEM). This ~ater quality simulation package provides a generalized
framework for modeling nutrient fate and transport in surface waters (Cerco and Cole, 1995).
The BHEM package includes a watershed model, a hydrodynamic model, a water quality, model
and a sediment flux sub-model, and represents twenty-two water quality parameters from the
water column and sediment bed. For detailed information, please refer to the report "The
Development of a Water Quality Model lbr Baltimore Harbor, Back River and the Adjacent
Upper Chesapeake Bay" (Wang et al., 2004).
Since many studies have shown the significant influence of the Chesapeake Bay on its tributaries,
the spatial domain of the BHEM extends longitudinally from the mouth of the Susquehanna River
about 90 miles seaward (south) to the mouth of the Patuxent River, which is defined as the upper
Chesapeake Bay. Baltimore Ilarbor is located on the western shoreline of the upper Chesapeake
Bay. This modeling domain is represented by BItEM model segments. A diagram of the model
segmentation is presented in Wang et al (2004).
The water quality model, Corps of Engineers Water Quality Compartment Model (CI--QUALICM), is externally coupled with the three-dimensional, time-variable hydrodynamic model,
Curvilinear Hydrodynamic in Three Dimensions, (CH3D). As its name indicates, CH3D makes
hydrodynamic computations on a curvilinear or boundary-fitted platform grid that allows the
model to accurately represent the deep navigation channel and irregular shoreline. The CFt3D
simulates physical processes such as tides, wind, density effects (salinity and temperature),
freshwater inflows, turbulence, and the effect of the earth's rotation. The model outputs are used
to drive the water quality model (Johnson et al,, 1991).
The sediment flux model developed by DiToro and Fitzpatrick (1993), and coupled with CEQUAL-ICM for Chesapeake Bay water quality modeling efforts, is used in the present model
application. The state variables, resulting fluxes, and complete model documentation can be
found in Wang et al (2004), and also in l)iToro and Fitzpatrick (1993).
The stormwater load and nonpoint source loading estimation was conducted using a HSPF
watershed model, which simulates the fate and transport of pollutants over the entire hydrologic
cycle. Details of this effort are described in Section 2.1.4.2. For detailed information, see
"Patapsco/Back River Watershed IISPF Model Report" (MDE, 2001).
The BHEM package described above ",'.'ascalibrated to reproduce observed v,ater quality
characteristics |br 1992-1997 conditions. The calibration of'the model for these six years
establishes an analytical tool that may be used to assess a range of scenarios with differing flow
and nutrient loading conditions. For a detailed explanation of the calibration of the watershed
model, hydrodynamic model, water quality model and sediment flux model please refer to MDE.
2001 and Wang et aL, (2004).
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
16
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
05/29/2009
(Unofficial)
FINAl.
4.2.1.1 Eutrophication Model Calibration
The calibration and verification of the BttEM modeling package ',,,'as reviewed and accepted by
various modeling technical groups, i.e., Chesapeake Bay Program Modeling Subcommittee and
Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisory. Group. The calibration of the eutrophication model is
the process of modifying the model input parameters until the model output matches the set of
observed v, ater column data in an optimal way. Observed v, ater quality, hydrological, and
loading data collected during the period 1992- 1997 were used to calibrate the BHEM. Figures 8
and 9 show the results of the model calibration for chlorophyll a and DO at station W T f l in both
surface and bottom water. Additional time series and longitudinal data profiles from the MDE
and CBP stations for various nutrient parameters may be found in Wang et al (2004) and are also
available upon request and through the MDE TMDI. website as supporting documentation. The
time series data files are too large to incorporate as appendices to this report.
~f~2(wTS"I) 1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
SURf-AC~
2D
W
II
I
x
n
•
~oo •
,c
!
0
N
5
D
BoI"rDu
20
E
"-~ 10
0
5
3B5
730
IO95
I~80
0AYS SINCE ,,I,~'~I.~RY 1 Ig92
1825
21 gO
CBP Obser',ed D O Data
O MDE Obser,.cd I)O Data
M o d e l Calibration resuhs: Weekl> M i n i m u m and M a x i m u m DO
.............. M o d e l Calibration resuhs: Weekl', A',erage I)O
X
Figure 8: Time Series of Model Calibration Results of DO in Harbor Station WT5.1
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMI)I.
Document version: December 14, 2006
17
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
2C0
~WT5.1)
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
SURFACE
150
~,oo
_a
O
w
x~a
w
O
•
]~
jJt
9
so
':
0
".
.....
2O0
BOTrDU
150
I
~o0
O
50
ww
•
=
0
.]65
X
7.~O
1095
1460
DAYS SINCE JANUARY 1 t992
1825
2190
CBP Obsev, ed Chloroph;,ll a Data
O MDE Obser',,ed Chloroph>ll a Data
Model Calibration results: Wcekl,', Minimum and Maximum (_'hloroph>ll u
Model Calibration results: Weekly A'.eragc Chloroph',ll a
Figure 9: Time Series of Model Calibration Results of Chl a in Harbor Station WT5.1
4.2.2 TMDL Analysis Frame work
The nutrient TMDL analysis consists of two broad elements: an assessment of growing season
loading conditions and an assessment of average annual loading conditions. Both the growing
season and the average annual flow TMDL analyses investigate the critical conditions under
which symptoms of eutrophication are typically most acute. During excessively dr)' or wet years
the flux in Ioadings impact water quality significantly. Additionally, water quality is impacted
during late summer when flows are low. the system is poorly flushed, and sunlight and
temperatures are most conducive to excessive algal production. The TMDL analysis allows a
comparison of current loading conditions to future conditions that project the water quality
response to various simulated load reductions of the impairing substances.
4.2.2.1 Dissolved Oxygen Analytical Framework
In April 2003, the CBP published its approach to assessing the attainment of water quali~' criteria
designed to protect the living resources of the Chesapeake Bay and its tidal tributaries, as defined
by their respective designated uses. In 2005, MDE adopted the CBP DO criteria and its
associated attainment methodology, utilizing DO biological reference curves to represent the
spatial and temporal distribution of DO concentrations. MDE is applying this methodology using
Cumulative Frequency Distributions (CFDs) for the Baltimore Harbor generated from model
output, and compared against the CBP reference curves, to assess spatial and temporal DO criteria
exceedanccs. This method quantifies the degree of criteria attainment or exceedence by
incorporating the percent of area or volume of a region that meets or exceeds the DO criterion for
Baltimore t tarbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
18
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
the specific designated uses periods. Using CFDs generated from the model data, the calibrated
and verified assessment results express exceedances above the reference curve (violations of the
alloy, able criteria limit) as percentages of the total time-volume for the area. These percentages
are then used to determine ',~,hcther a load reduction (TMDL) is required to meet the designated
use.
The CFDs are derived from empirical, biolog):based field data wherever possible. The DO
criteria are intended have several duration curves that reflect in silu conditions: 30-day mean. 7day mean, l-day mean and the instantaneous minimum. However, given the limitations in
directly monitoring at the temporal scales required for assessing attainment of the instantaneous
minimum, I-day mean and 7-da) mean criteria. EPA indicates that the states can waive
attainment assessments for these criteria until monitoring at the required temporal scales is
implemented or apply statistical methods to estimate probable attainment (EPA, April 2003). For
these reasons, MDE will assess the DO attainment for only the 30-day component of the Open
Water Use and Deep Water Use l)O criteria in the Baltimore Harbor. For the Migratory Fish
Nurser>. and Spawning Use. EPA indicates that until more data are collected to better assess the
attainment of the 7-day mean and instantaneous minimum criteria of this designated use, the Open
Water DO reference curve should be applied. For the Migratory Fish Nursery and Spawning t/se
attainment analysis. MD£ utilized the Open Water DO reference curve and model output
associated ~ith the Migratory Fish Nursery and Spawning Use period. Figure 10 below is an
example of the CBP DO reference cu~'e adopted by MDE. (For more information on monitoring,
assessment of DO criteria attainment, and CBP DO reference curves, please refer to the CBP
document entitled "Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and
Chlorophyll a for the Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal Tributaries" (EPA, 2003).
tO0
ij
8O
00
,o.
CgO O.~Q
3O
I0
10 20 30 40 ~
~t 70 80 ~ 1GO
P~wJ m m i o ul A m b ' , e l m ' n I ; ~ r ~ l ~ ' ~ t I'm ¢ ~ , U
Figure 10: Cumulative Frequency Distribution curve representing an approximately 10
percent allowable exeeedance equally distributed between time and space (EPA, 2003)
Additionally. the Deep Channel Designated Use area does not have a reference curve. The Deep
Channel is defined as the region below the lower boundary oftbe pycnocline, extending down to
the v, ater/sediment interface. The Deep Channel Designated Use is applied from June I s~ to
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
19
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
September 30 th and requires an instantaneous minimum concentration of 1.0 mg/I. Two factors
have prevented the development and application of a "reference curve" approach as used in the
other segments of the water column. First, the Deep Channel portion of the Chesapeake Bay has
not been monitored as part of the long-term benthic monitoring program and therefore lacks
appropriate data for development of a reference curve. Second, the Deep Channel segment of the
Chesapeake Bay is considered severely degraded and appropriate reference sites with similar
characteristics and non-degraded conditions are not available.
Due to the unavailability of a reference curve to assess attainment, MDE has conducted an
analysis to determine the percentage of time when the modeled DO concentration in the Deep
Channel was below the 1.0 mg/l instantaneous minimum concentration required by the criteria.
The assessment consisted of an evaluation of the modeled scenario DO concentrations versus the
instantaneous minimum concentration.
4.2.2.2 Chlorophyll a Analytical Framework
Model results were compared to the quantitative implementation of the narrative Chl a criteria
stated in Section 3.0 as: (I) ensuring that instantaneous concentrations remain below 100 p.g/I at
all times and (2) minimizing exceedances of the 50 lag/I, 30-day rolling average, to a frequency
that will not result in ecologically undesirable conditions.
4.3 Scenario Descriptions and Results
The scenarios are grouped according to baseline conditions, future conditions, and a maxtmum
anthropogenic reduction from Bahimore Harbor scenario. The baseline condition is intended to
provide a point of reference by which to compare future scenarios that simulate conditions of a
TMDL. The future conditions scenario is associated with TMDI,s, while the maximum
anthropogenic reduction from Baltimore Harbor scenario is used as a bounding exercise to
determine if" it is possible to achieve water quality standards in the Deep Channel portion of the
Ilarbor. The baseline and future conditions scenarios were used to estimate growing season and
average annual TMDI,s. The period 1995-1997 corresponds to the "'baseline" period in analyses
described below. The following analyses allow a comparison between current water quality
conditions and future conditions that project various simulated load reductions of impairing
substances.
4.3.1 Baseline Conditions Scenario
The baseline conditions scenario represents the observed conditions of the Harbor and its
tributaries from 1995-1997. Simulating the system for three years accounts for various loading
and hydrologic conditions, which represent possible critical conditions and seasonal variations of
the system. For example, the 1995-1997 period includes an average year (1995), a wet year
(1996) and a dry year (1997). l'he modeling approach also specifically examines conditions
during summer months when the river system is poorly flushed, and sunlight and warm water
temperatures are more conducive to creating the water quality problems associated with excessive
nutrient enrichment.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14. 2006
20
?0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
The nonpoint nutrient loads, including urban storrnwater loads, were estimated from the IISPF
n~del of the F'atapsco and Back River watersheds. The IISPF model utilized land use
information and hydrology associated with the 1995-1997 period to generate loading estimates for
this scenario. The HSPF model simulates stormwater and nonpoint Ioadings by integrating all
natural and human-induced sources, including direct atmospheric deposition and loads from
septic tanks. For point source loads, this scenario uses the municipal WWTP and industrial
discharge monitoring data from 1995-1997. Additionally, time series and longitudinal data
profiles from the MDE and CBP stations for various nutrient parameters are available upon
request and through the MDE TMDL website as supporting documentation. The time series data
files are too large to incorporate as appendices to this report.
4.3.2 Baseline Conditions Scenario Results
Results of DO and Chl a concentrations represented in the baseline scenario are summarized in
Figures I I and 12. Figure I I displays the observed and mcxleled DO data while Figure 12
displays the observed and modeled Chl a concentrations at station WT5.1 in both surface and
bottom ~ ater.
1995
1996
J
2C
•
~-
g
1997
•
.~1
S L R;'bC~-
"J,tJt~
~"
lw
,,If
IC
!
it
5
0 ¸
2C ¸
15 ¸
v
IC
730
t 095
OAYS ~ I N C E J A . ~ , G A ~ 1 ! g g 5
X
CBP Observed I)O Data
O M D E Obscr,.ed D O Data
Model Calibration results: W c c k l ) ~,tinimum and M a x i m u m D O
................ Model Calibration results: Week]', A~,cragc D O
Figure I 1: Time Series of Model Results for the Baseline Conditions Scenario for DO in
Baltimore Harbor Station WT5.1
Baltimore Ilarbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: December 14. 2006
21
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
200
1995.
1996
1997 surrAcr.
,.~ ' 0 0
u
5O
•
,r
0
150
,Z.~ 100
1
t~
t>O
0
:~AY~ SzN~E ,,ANLARY 1 l g G 5
X CBP Chloroph)ll a Obser'.ed data
O MDE Chloroph) ll a Obser'.ed data
Model Calibration resutts: Minimum and Maximum Chloroph~,LI a
Model Calibration results: 3OMa) Rolling A,,t.'rage Chlorophyll a
Figure 12: Model Results for the Baseline Conditions Scenario for Chl a in Baltimore
H a r b o r Station WT5.1
4.3.2.1 Dissolved Oxygen Assessment of the Baseline Conditions
Scenario
For the DO assessment of the baseline conditions scenario in the Baltimore ttarbor, the CBP
reference curve approach for the Migratory Fish and Spawning, Open Water and I)ecp Water
Designated Uses was used. Due to limited data in the Baltimore Harbor, the calibrated model
output generated during the baseline conditions scenario was used for the attainment analysis•
The attainment assessment procedure is as lbllows: First, using the calibrated model DO output
for the baseline conditions scenario period (1995-1997), DO attainment curves are developed for
the Migratory Fish and Spawning, Open Water and Deep Water Designated Uses. Second, the
reference curves from the CBP are obtained. Third, MDE generated attainment curves tbr each of
the designated use areas are compared to the corresponding CBP reference curves. The results of
the comparison allow MI)E to quantify the degree of criteria attainment or exceedance based on
the amount of area or volume of a specific designated use region.
A summary oftbe attainment assessment is presented in Table 7. The baseline scenario
assessment of the DO criteria attainment for the Migrator), Fish Spawning and Nurser)'
Designated Use, which applies from February I st tO May 3 ]st indicates that there is a period of
nonattainment in time and volume that represents a 3% exceedance of the criteria (See Appendix
A. Figure A4). The assessment of DO criteria attainment for the Open Water Designated Use,
which applies from June 1~ to September 30 tn indicates that there is a period of nonattainment in
time and volume that represents a 3% exceedance of the criteria (See Appendix A, Figure A5).
The assessment of DO criteria attainment for the Open Water Designated Use, which also applies
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
22
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
from October 1't to January 3U, indicates that there is a period of nonattainment in time and
volume that represents a 2% exceedance of the criteria (See Appendix A, Figure A6). The
assessment of the DO criteria attainment for the Deep Water Designated Use, which applies fi'om
June I 'a to September 30 th, indicates that there is a period of nonatlainment in time and volume
that represents a 23% exceedance of the criteria (See Appendix A, Figure A7).
MDE conducted an analysis of the baseline scenario to determine the percentage of time when the
modeled DO concentration in the Deep Channel was below the 1.0 mg/I instantaneous minimum
concentration required by the criteria. The assessment consisted ofan evaluation ofthe modeled
baseline scenario IX) concentrations versus the instantaneous minimum concentration. The result
of this assessment indicates that the Deep Channel exceeded the criteria 87% of the time and
volume.
The Deep Channel segment of the Baltimore I larbor is considered degraded due to two related
factors. The first is the dredging that occurs in the channel, allowing for the passage of ships in
and out of the commercial port areas within the Harbor. The dredging has resulted in
modifications of the Harbor hydrodynamic circulation patterns that effectively separate the Deep
Channel portion of the water column from the remaining water column during the late spring
through fall seasons. This occurs due to temperature and salinity barriers that do not allow
mixing of surface waters with deep channel waters. Second, maintenance dredging and propeller
wash from ship movements result in the periodic disturbance and/or removal of any biological
communities that may be established during the interval between dredging events.
Table 7: Baseline Conditions Scenario: Percent Nonattainment of D~solved Oxygen
Criteria in the Baltimore Harbor
Period
Designated
Use
%
Nonattainment
Migratory
Februao' 1~t
to May 31 st
June l ~ to
September 30 ~h
October I 'L to
Januar'[ 31 ,t
February I st to
January 31 ~
Baltimore l tarbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
Fish
Spawning
and Nursery
3%
Open Water
3%
Deep Water
23%
Deep
Channel
87%
Open Water
2%
Open Water
0%
23
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
4.3.2.2 Chlorophyll u Assessment for the Baseline Conditions Scenario
The Chl a levels in the baseline conditions scenario output were analyzed using a 30-day rolling
average as referenced in Section 2.3. The analysis shows that in both surface and botlom water,
Chl a concentrations exceeded 50 p.g/I during early spring and the summer months of 1995 (see
Figure 12) and occasionally were observed to exceed 100 lag/I. Chl a rarely exceeded 50 p.g/l
during 1996 and 1997.
4.3.3 Maximum Anthropogenic Reduction from Baltimore Harbor Scenario
Based on the exceedances of the water quality criteria associated with the baseline scenario,
particularly in the Deep Channel Designated Use, MDE conducted a scenario run to determine
whether the act of removing anthropogenic nutrient sources, both point and nonpoint, would
result in the attainment of water quality standards within the Deep Channel Designated Use
region of the Baltimore t tarbor. This scenario provides an estimate of the water quality response
if the maximum amount of anthropogenic nutrient loading reductions were made in the Baltimore
Harbor watershed. To conduct this analysis, the water quality model was run with nutrient loads
from point and nonpoint sources reduced to zero. The sediment model was allowed to continue
running from the initial condition set by the calibration, and the upper Bay loading conditions
were based on the calibration period. With all sources of nutrients removed the model was
allowed to run for six years to determine the impact on water quality.
4.3.4 Maximum Anthropogenic Reduction Scenario Results
Modeled results lbr the maximum anthropogenic reduction scenario of DO levels in the surface
and bottom waters at station WT5.1 are summarized in Figure 13. Under this scenario, the
attainment assessment results indicate that DO concentration will be < 1.0 mg/I in the Deep
Channel for approximately 57.8% of the time and volume that Deep Channel criteria are in effect.
"Fheretbre, the Deep Channel criteria are not achieved in this scenario.
The results of this model scenario predict that with the removal of anthropogenic point and
nonpoint sources of nutrients, the Baltimore I larbor will not fully meet the Deep Channel
Designated Use ~'~aterquality standard although all other standards will be met. The constant
manipulation and sequential deepening of the channel over time has created a system in which the
water in the Ilarbor channel is effectively sealed off from mixing action during the summer
months due to the hydrodynamic circulation pattern. As a result, oxygen is not transferred from
the upper portions of the water column into the Baltimore Harbor channel. Consequently, the
oxygen that is present in the channel during the winter and spring seasons is being consumed but
not replaced during the summer months. The maximum anthropogenic reduction from Baltimore
I tarbor scenario indicates that the hydrodynamics of the Harbor system create conditions whereby
the Harbor channel becomes anoxic for periods during the summer.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMI)L
Document version: December 14, 2006
24
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL.
M 1 6(WT,~.I )
SU IF'ACE (19)
2O
m
_~-
m
ii
II
15
<
•
KN
M
•
xN
I
~,E 10
8
5
U
0
B~TroM
2O ~
15.
E
~
10
II
x
0
(;1)
.era
jl
:
O
5
0
o
365
7 ...~C}
1095
1460
1825
2190
DAYS SINCE JANUARY 1 1992
Figure 13: Maximum Anthropogenic Reduction Scenario model results for DO levels in
surface and bottom waters in Baltimore Harbor at Station WT5.1
4.3.5 Future Conditions (TMDL) Scenario
This scenario provides an estimate of future conditions in the Baltimore Harbor system based on a
simulation with I) WWTP discharges ,set at design flow and nitrogen and phosphorus
concentrations based on Maryland's Enhanced Nutrient Reduction (ENR) strategy, 2) industrial
discharges based on permitted flow and concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus reduced based
on estimates of loading reductions due to technological improvements, and 3) urban stormwatcr
and agricultural loads for all subwatersheds draining into the Baltimore Harbor reduced by 15%.
Based on the results of the Maximum Anthropogenic Reduction Scenario, which indicated the
Deep Channel Designated Use would not achieve water qualit,, standards at all times with the
removal of all anthropogenic nutrient sources, MDF developed this scenario to represent the
current limit of technology for municipal WWTPs, and an aggressive nutrient reduction goal for
industrial point sources and nonpoint sources. This scenario was used to estimate both growing
season and average annual flow "FMDLs.
The point source loads from the Patapsco and Cox Creek WWTPs were based on National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPI)ES) permit flows and ENR-based concentrations of
TN equal to 4 m~l annual average (3 mg/I in May-October and 5 mg/I in November-April) and
TP of 0.3 mg/I. These levels are consistent with Maryland's Tributary Strategy and I:NR Policy.
Baltimore t larbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: December 14, 2006
25
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Industrial point source flows and concentrations vary tbr the different t'acilities, and their etlluent
Ioadings were based on recent performance levels, after having already achieved significant
loading reductions since the initial baselines established in 1985. Their recent performance levels
were then adjusted based on additional potential loading reductions.
Urban stormwater and agricultural "IN and TP loads for this scenario were reduced by 15% from
their baseline loads in order to reach the water quality, goals for Chesapeake Bay waters. The
baseline urban stormwater and agricultural loads are estimated by the ttSPF watershed model as
described in "Patapsco/Back River Watershed HSPF Model Report" (MDE, 2001). The loading
reductions are based on the implementation of urban and agricultural Best Management Practices
(BMPs) that are used to reduce pollution from these land uses. The load reduction was quantified
based on nutrient removal efficiency ratings that have been developed for various BMPs. This
approach is based on the assumptions made by the CBP in its Chesapeake Bay watershed
modeling effort and is consistent with the method used to develop Maryland's Tributary
Strategies.
The I larbor watershed land uses are comprised of approximately 55% urban, 15% agricultural,
and 29% tbrest. An assessment of the urban and agricultural land use components indicate that
the baseline load lbr urban land use is approximately 43% of the average annual TN load, 75% of
the average annual TP load, 49% of the growing season TN load, and 78% of the growing season
TP load from watershed land uses. Similarly, the baseline load for agricultural landuse is
approximately 33% of the average annual "IN load, 12% of the average annual TP load, 24% of
the growing season TN load. and I 1% of the growing season TP load from watershed land uses.
Other non-urban stormwater and non-agricultural nutrient loads, including forest loads, represent
the remaining contribution to the total load.
4.3.6 Future Conditions (TMDL) Scenario Results
DO and Chl a time series results for water quality station WT5.1 tbr surface and botlom waters
for the "I'MI)I. scenario are summarized in Figures 14 and 15. As displayed in Figure 14, under
the TMDL scenario, the minimum DO concentrations at water qualib' station WT5.1 are above
6.5 mg/I in the surface water. However, the bottom water DO decreases to below I mg/I and
approaches 0 mg/I during the summer months. It can be observed that the anoxic condition starts
later and ends earlier than in the baseline scenario. As displayed in Figure 15, under the TMDL
scenario, Chl a concentrations at Water Quality Station WI'5. I remain below 50 p.g/l in both the
surface and botlom waters. Additional time series and longitudinal data profiles from the MDE
and CBP stations for various nutrient parameters are available upon request and through the MDE
TMDL website as supporting documentation. The time series data files are too large to
incorporate as appendices to this report.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
26
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
1995
1996
1997
SURFACE
20
15
E
..\.,,,.- .""if-
10
j//
"~.
8
5
80TTOM
20
15
; V' 'v ~,
J
O
5
o i ....
0
i
r~2
',
/'
,~J
#/
~.~L"¥~: . . . . . . . .
~'~-,~,'--'.; . . . . . . . .
730
DAYS SINCE JANUARY 1 lgg5
T M D L ."gccnario results: Minimum and Maximum D O
'~
365
1095
............................ TM ) Scenar o rcsu s: Weckl) A~erage DO
Figure 14: T i m e S e r i e s o f M o d e l R ~ u l t s for the T M D L S c e n a r i o for D O at Station W T 5 . 1
200
1995
1996
1997
SURFACE
1,50
ol
.2.=100
J
I
50
/
..-,
0
200
80TrOW
150
~100
O
50
365
DAYSS.NCEJANcARv 1
7.30
1095
1995
I M D I . S c e n a r i o results: M o v i n g 30~Ja~ A ~ e r a g e C h l o r o p h ) II a
Figure 15: T i m e S e r i e s o f M o d e l Results for the T M D L S c e n a r i o for Chl a at Station W T 5 . 1
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient T M D L
Document version: December 14, 2006
27
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
4.3.6.1 Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Attainment Assessment of the Future
Conditions (TMDL) Scenario
The I)O attainment assessment of the TMDL scenario in the Baltimore Harbor was performed as
explained in the baseline conditions scenario assessment (Section 4.3.2.1 ). The attainment and
reference curve assessments generated for the Migratory Fish Spawning and NurseD', Open
Water, and Deep Water Designated Uses are provided in Appendix B. The following is a
summary of the attainment assessment analysis.
The TMDL scenario assessment of the DO criteria attainment for the Migratory Fish Spawning
and Nursery Designated Use, which applies from February l~t to May 31 ~ indicates that the
attainment curve is always below the reference curve and that the designated use is met 100% of
the time (See Appendix B, Figure BI ). The assessment of the DO criteria attainment for the Open
Water Designated Use, which applies from June 1~ to September 30 Lh and from October I St to
JanuaD 31 st. indicates that there is a period of nonattainment; however, this period is not
significant enough in time or volume affected to cause an exceedance of the criteria, therefore the
designated use is being met (See Appendix B, Figures B2 and B3). The assessment of the DO
criteria attainment for the Deep Water Designated Use, which applies from June I st tO September
30 th, indicates that there is a period of nonattainment in time and volume that represents a 7%
exceedance of the criteria (See Appendix B, Figure B4). The Deep Water DO criteria allows a
restoration variance of up to 7% applied spatially and/or temporally from June I to September 30
(COMAR 26.08.02.03-3 C(8)(e)(vi)); theretbre, the assessment of the DO criteria indicates that
the designated use is attained. During the remaining months of the year, these areas are
designated as Open Water and the criteria are met.
MDE conducted an analysis of the TMDL scenario to determine the percentage of time when the
modeled DO concentration in the Deep Channel was below the 1.0 mg/I instantaneous minimum
concentration required by the criteria. The assessment consisted of an evaluation of the modeled
TMDL scenario DO concentrations versus the instantaneous minimum concentration. "l'he result
of this assessment indicates that the Deep Channel exceeded the criteria 78.5% of the time and
volume.
During the October I ~ato May 31 ~a peric~l the Deep Water and Deep Channel Designated Use
areas are considered Open Water Designated Use. Results of the attainment assessment utilizing
the reference curve approach indicate that the criteria are achieved. Table 8 presents a summary,
of the Baltimore Harbor DO attainment assessment fbr the TMDI~ Scenario.
Baltimore Itarbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: December 14, 2006
28
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Table 8: TMDL Scenario: Percent Nonattainment of Dissolved Oxygen Criteria in the
Baltimore H a r b o r
Period
Designated
Use
%
Nonattainment
Februar)' I st
to May 31 st
Migrator)
Fish
Spawning
and Nursery
0%
Open Water
0%
Deep Water*
7%
Deep
Channel
78.5%
Open Water
0%
June I st to
Septcmbcr 30 ~h
October I ~t to
January 31 st
*qhe Deep ~,~,atcr dc~,ignated use DO criterion allov, s a restoration variance of up to 7% applied spatiall? and/or
temporalb /?om June 1 to September 30.
4.3.6.2 Chlorophyll a Criteria Attainment Assessment of the Future
Conditions (TMDL) Scenario
Under the TMDI. scenario, Chl a concentrations at Water Quality Station WT5. I remain below
50 p.g/l in both the surface and bottom waters, indicating attaininent of the narrative criteria for
Chl a (see Figure 15 above).
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: December 14, 2006
29
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
4.4 TMDL Loading Caps
]'he TMI)l.s for nitrogen and phosphorus are presented below. The detailcd calculation of TMl)l.
loading allocations can be found in Appendix C.
For the period of May l through October 31, the ibllowing TMDLs apply:
Growing Season TMDLs:
NITROGEN TMDL
2,145,750 Ibs/grow mg season
PHOSPHORUS TMDL
149,152 Ibs/growing season
The average annual TMDI,s Ibr nitrogen and phosphorus arc:
Average Annual TMDLs:
NITROGEN TMDL
5.323,963 Ibs/year
324,309 Ibs/year
PHOSPHORUS TMDL
4.5 Load Allocations Between Point Sources and Nonpoint Sources
This section describes one viable allocation of loads between point sources, nonpoint sources, and
the margin of safety for the nitrogen and phosphorus TMDLs. A more detailed overview of
potential allocations to various sources is provided in the accompanying point and nonpoint
Technical Memorandums. r b e allocations presented are quantified for growing season (May l ~t
through October 31 ~) and average annual conditions. The State reserves the rights to revise these
allocations provided the allocations are consistent with the achievement of water quality
standards.
4.5.1 Growing Season TMDL Allocations
Load Allocations (LA)
•
Nonpoint Source Loads
The nonpoint source loads represent the loads from agricultural land, forest and other
herbaceous land, and septic systems. The nitrogen and phosphorus loading reductions
simulated in the T M D L scenario represent a 15% reduction from the baseline agricultural
loads and an explicit margin o f safety (MOS) that is approximately 5% of the reduced
agricultural loads for the growing season period. "lhe other nonpeint source loads such as
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI,
Document version: December 14, 2006
30
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
septic systems and forest loads were not reduced from baseline condition levels. See
Appendix C for LA calculations.
Waste Load Allocations (WLA)
•
Stormwater Loads
In November 2002, EPA advised States that Municipal Separate Storm Se~ser System
(MS4) storm~vater discharges must be addressed by the wasteload allocation (WI.A) (See
40 C.F.R. § 130.2(h)). Therefore, MS4 communities regulated by NPDES permits will
have their loads reflected in the WLA. The urban stormwater loads of nitrogen and
phosphorus simulated in the Baltimore Harbor TMDL scenario are reduced 15% from the
baseline urban stormwater loads.
The TMDL. including loads from urban stormwater discharges, is nov,' expressed as:
TMDL = WLA [NPDES point sources * +
regulated stormwater point source[
+ LA + MOS + FA (if applicable)
" N P D E S , p o i n t s o u r c e s i n c l u d e m u n i c i p a l a n d industrial w a s t e ~ a t e r t r e a t m e n t plants,
Phase I and Phase 11 MS4's stormwater permits will be considered point sources sul:tject to
WLA assignment in the TMDI.. EPA recognizes that limitations in the available data and
information usually preclude stormwater allocations to specific outfalls. Therefore, EPA
guidance allows the urban stormwater WI.A to be expressed as a gross allotment, rather
than individual allocations for separate pipes, ditches, construction sites, etc.
Estimating a load contribution to a particular waterbody from the stormwater is imprecise,
given the variability in sources, runoff volumes, and pollutant loads over time. Therefore,
the urban stormwater WLA is based on the best Ioadings estimate currently available. For
the Baltimore tlarbor the current data allows the urban stormwater allocation to be defined
separately for Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Anne Arundel County, Carroll CounR,.
and Howard County. llowever, it should be noted that these WLAs aggregate municipal
and industrial stormwater, including the loads from highways and construction activity.
•
Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plants Loads
During the 1995-1997 baseline conditions period, there were seven permitted point
sources discharging nutrients into the Baltimore Harbor. For the TMDI.s scenario, all
seven point sources were given an allocation. In addition to the seven permitted point
sources considered in the baseline scenario, the Cox Creek Dredged Material Containment
Facility (DMCF) is included in the TMDI. scenario and given an allocation. The Cox
Creek DMCF was not discharging during the 1992-1997 period, therefore was not
considered in the calibration of the model and the baseline scenario.
The Patapsco and Cox Creek WWTPs maximum allowable current permit flows are used
for this scenario. Concentrations were adjusted to reflect Maryland's ENR Strategy of a
maximum total nitrogen concentrations of 3 mg/l from May I st tO October 31 s~. Total
Baltimore Ilarbor Nutrient TMDI,
Document version: December 14, 2006
31
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.,
phosphorus limits are 0.3 mg/I year round. Industrial point source flows and
concentrations vary from plant to plant, and are set at levels based on the implementation
of best available technologies to achieve water quality criteria in both local and
Chesapeake Bay waters. These allocations are also consistent with Maryland's current
Tributary Strategy. All significant point sources are addressed by this allocation and are
described further in the technical memorandum entitled "Significant Nutrient Point
Sources in the Baltimore ttarbor Watershed". The nitrogen and phosphorus allocations
for growing season conditions are presented in Table 9. See Appendix C for WLA
calculations.
Nonpoint Source I
Table 9: Growing Season Allocations
TotalNitrogen
Total Phosphorus
(Ibs¢#rowin8 season)
(Ibs/growinE season)
459.912
12,776
Point Source 2
1,642,014
113,212
FA
33,204
22,848
MOS 3
10,620
316
2,145,750
149,152
Total
I.
2.
3.
Does not include regulated urban storm~ater loads.
Includesregulated urban stormwater loads.
Approximatel) 5% of the reduced agricultural loads,
4.5.2 Average Annual TMDL Allocations
Load Allocations (LA)
Noupoint Source Loads
The average annual nonpoint source loads represent the average loads from agricultural
land, fbrest and other herbaceous land, and septic systems. The nitrogen and phosphorus
loadings simulated in the TMDI. scenario represent a 15% reduction from the baseline
agricultural loads and an explicit MOS that is approximately 5% of the reduced
agricultural loads. Other nonpoint source loads such as septic systems and forest and
other herbaceous loads were not reduced from baseline condition levels. See Appendix C
for LA calculations.
Waste Load Allocations (WLA)
•
Urban Stormwater Loads
For the average annual TMDL, the urban stormwater loads of nitrogen and phosphorus
simulated in the TMDLs scenario represent a 15% reduction in TN and TP from average
annual baseline urban stormwater loads.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: December 14, 2006
32
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Municipal and Industrial Wastewater Treatment Plants Loads
The Patapsco and Cox Creek WWTPs maximum allowable current permit flows are used.
The TN concentration was set to a maximum of 3 mg/l from May I ~t to October 31 st and 5
mg/I from November I st to April 30 th. The TP concentrations for the two plants were set
at 0.3 mg/I year-round. Industrial point source flows and concentrations vary. from plant
to plant, and the~, are set at leve/s based on the implementation of best avai/able
technologies to achieve watcr quality criteria in both local and Chesapeake Bay waters.
These allocations are also consistent with Maryland's current Tributary Strategy. All
significant point sources are addressed by this allocation and arc described further in the
technical memorandum entitled "~ignificant Nutrient Point Sources in the Baltimore
Harbor Watershed". The nonpoint and point source nitrogen and phosphorus allocations
for average annual load conditions are sho~n in Table 10. See Appendix C for WLA
calculations.
Table 10: Average Annual Allocations
Total Phosphorus (Ibs/,vr)
Total Nitrogen ~b,¢/)'0
Nonpoint Source j
PointSource e
FA
MOS ~
Total
1,246,036
3,976,215
66,410
35.302
5.323,963
34,654
243,127
45,690
838
324,309
I
Does not include regulated urban storm~ater loads.
2. Includes regulated urban storm~ater loads.
3 Approximately 5°/,, of the reduced agricultural loads.
4.6 Margin of Safety (MOS) and Future Allocation (FA)
A MOS is required as part o f a TMDL in recognition of many uncertainties in the understanding
and simulation of water quality in natural systems. For example, knowledge is incomplete
regarding the magnitude of pollutant loads from various sources due to normal variations in
precipitation and process changes, and the specific impacts of those pollutants on the chemical
and biological quality of complex, natural waterbodies. The MOS is intended to account for such
uncertainties in a manner that is conservative from the standpoint ofenvironmental protection.
Based on EPA guidance, the MOS can be achieved through two approaches (EPA. April 1991).
One approach is to explicitly reserve a portion of the loading capacity as a separate term in the
TMDL (i.e., TMDI. = LA + WLA + MOS). The second approach is to incorporate the MOS as
conservative assumptions used in the TMDL analysis (implicit MOS). Maryland has adopted a
MOS for these TMDI,s using the first approach. For both the growing season and the average
annual flow TMDLs, the load allocated to the MOS is approximately 5% of the reduced
agricultural loads for nitrogen and phosphorus. The MOS is not considered a part of the reduced
agricultural loads; it is a separate term in the TMDL equation. That is, the sum of the MOS and
the reduced agricultural loads is equalto the load reduction that was used in the model run to
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
33
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
determine the "IMDL. These explicit nitrogen and phosphorus margins of safety are presented in
Tables 9 and 10. See Appendix C for MOS calculations.
Future Allocation represents an allowance for future growth, which accounts for reasonably
foreseeable increases in pollutant loads (40 CFR 130.33(b)(9)). Future growth can be included in
the TMDL by reserving a separate allocation for this purpose or by allocating acceptable
wasteloads and loads in a way that incorporates potential growth. In the Baltimore Harbor
nutrients TMDL analysis, the first approach is used for the nitrogen and phosphorus TMDLs to
address the contingency that a seasonal nitrogen limit based on 3 mg/I of nitrogen and a limit of
0.3 mg/I of phosphorus may not be practical for ENR technology at some t~.cilities.
Baltimore Itarbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
34
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
4.7 SummaD' of Total Maximum Daily Loads
The Grov,.ing Season TMDLs, applicable from May I- October 31, for the Baltimore tlarbor:
For Nitrogen:
TMDL
(lbs/growing
season)
=
LA
+
WLA
+
FA
+
MOS
2,145,750
=
459,912
+
1,642,014
+
33,204
+
10,620
=
LA
+
WLA
+
FA
+
MOS
12,776
+
113,212
+
22,848
+
316
For Phosphorus:
TMDL
(Ib.~/growing
,season)
149,152
The average annual flow TMDI,s for the Bahimorc l larbor:
F o r Nitrogen:
TMDL
(Ib~year)
LA
+
WLA
+
FA
+
MOS
5,323,963
1,246,036
+
3,976,215
+
66,410
+
35,302
For Phosphorus:
TMDL
(lbs/year)
324,309
=
LA
+
WLA
+
FA
+
MOS
34,654
+
243,127
+
45,690
+
838
Whcrc:
TMDL
I,A
WI,A
MOS
= Total Maximum Daily Load
= Load Allocation (Nonpoint Source)
= Waste Load Allocation (Point Source)
= Margin o f Safety
Baltimore ttarbor Nutrient TMDI,
Document version: December 14, 2006
35
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Average Daily Loads:
The growing season TMDLs will result in average daily loads of approximately I 1,662 Ibs/day of
nitrogen and 817 lbs/day of phosphorus. Similarly, the average annual flow TMDLs will result in
average daily loads of approximately 14,586 Ibs/day of nitrogen and 889 Ibs/day of phosphorus.
Since nutrients do not result in acute impacts and the impacts of a given amount of nutrients vary
seasonally, these average daily loads are provided for informational purposes, since daily loads
will not be a factor controlling the ability to meet the water quality standards.
5.0
ASSURANCE OF IMPLEMENTATION
Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act and current EPA regulations require reasonable assurance
that the TMDL load and wasteload allocations can and will be implemented in order to achieve
water quality standards. In the Baltimore Harbor, both the TMDL and maximum anthropogenic
reduction analyses indicate that reductions of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus from all
sources, including the elimination of all point and nonpoint sources, do not result in the water
quality standards being met in all waters of the Harbor at all times. Under the TMDL scenario the
Deep Channel Designated Use region violates the water quality standard 78.5% of time and
volume. Under the maximum anthropogenic reduction scenario, the Deep Channel Designated
Use region violates the water quality standard 57.8% of time and volume. Under both of these
scenarios, however, the water quality standards are achieved tot all other designated uses that are
applicable in the Harbor.
The implementation of point source nutrient controls that will be an integral component to meet
water quality standards in the Harbor will be executed through the State's Enhanced Nutrient
Reduction (ENR) strategy and NPDES permits. The ENR program provides grant funds to local
governments to retrofit or upgrade WWTPs from BNR to ENR at their current ly approved design
capacity. Enhanced nutrient removal technologies allow sewage treatment plants to provide a
highly advanced level of nutrient removal. The ENR strategy builds on the success of the
biological nutrient removal (BNR) program already in place. Currently, the Patapsco WWTP is
designing its new ENR facility, Cox Creek WWTP is planning its new ENR facility, and the Back
River WWTP (supplier of processing water to ISG) is planning its new ENR facility. The
completion of the planning, design, and construction of these facilities will lead to significant
reductions in nutrients discharged into Baltimore Harbor. Upon completion of the ENR upgrades,
subsequent NPDES permits lbr the municipal WWfPs will include nutrient loading limits that
will be based upon achieving ENR levels of treatment. The significant industrial NPDES (>0.5
mgd) point sources will also have nutrient limits incorporated into subsequent permits that are
reissued following the completion of the TMDL. The reissued NPDES permits will attempt to
maintain consistency with the assumptions made in the TMDLs (e g., flow, nutrients effluent
concentrations, DO, etc.). Deadlines for completion of ENR upgrades will be incorporated into
NPDES permits based on the State's ENR upgrades schedule and, if the permitting timeframe is
shorter than the ENR schedule, permits will reflect what can reasonably be accomplished x~ith
consideration to the complexity of the engineering and the availability of resources.
The implementation of nonpoint source nutrient controls that will be an integral component to
achieve water quality standards in the I larbor will be executed through two approaches,
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI,
Document version: December 14, 2006
36
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
stormv, ater NPDES permits and cooperative agricultural reductions. In November 1990, EPA
required jurisdictions with a population greater than 100,000 to apply for NPDES Permits for
storm~ater discharges. The five jurisdictions where the Baltimore I larbor v, atershed is located,
Baltimore City, Baltimore Count). Anne Arundel County, Carroll County and Iloward County,
are required to participate in the stormwater NPDES program, and must comply with the NPDES
Permit regulations for stormwater discharges. Subsequently, stormwater management programs
have been implemented by the Counties and the City to control MS4 discharges to the maximum
extent practicable. For example. Baltimore County stormwater management program
encompasses numerous elements including: erosion and sediment control, post-construction
runoff management, controlling pollutants associated with road maintenance activities, public
education and outreach, and illicit discharge detection and elimination. Additionally. in targeted
watersheds, Baltimore County is required to implement watershed restoration for 10% of the
County's total impervious surface cover. Baltimore City is required to implement those watershed
restoration activities described above for addressing 20% of the City's impervious surfaces. In
order to meet this goal, annually, the City will have at least t~o restoration projects in study, tv, o
in design, and two under construction. A brief description ofeach project, phase, and cost can be
found in the City's NPDES stormwater annual report. Details of the Count)' and City programs
elements are available through MDE's Water Management Administration - NPDES Storm~ater
Program.
Additional significant planned implementation measures in the Baltimore Harbor watershed
involve the upgrade or separation of combined sewer systems in the City, and the upgrade of
sanitar) sewer systems in Baltimore Count). In 2002, Baltimore City, MDE. and U.S.
Fnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) entered into a civil consent decree to address SSOs and
combined sc~ser overflows (CSOs) I within its jurisdictional boundaries. Se..._~eU.S., et al., v. Mayor
and City' Council of Baltimore, JFM-02-12524, Consent Decree (entered Sept. 30, 2002).
Similarly, in 2005, Baltimore Count), MDE and EPA entered into a civil consent decree to
address SSOs in the County. Se__~eU.S., et al. v. Baltimore Count~: AMD-05-2028, Consent
Decree (entered Sept. 20, 2006). The consent decrees require the City and the Count~ to adopt
and implement a long term control plan ("LTCP") to evaluate their sanitar), sewer systems and to
repair, replace, or rehabilitate the system as indicated by the results of those evaluations, with all
work to be completed by Januar)' 2016 for Baltimore City and by March 2020 for Baltimore
County.
Mar) land's Water Quality Improvement Act requires that comprehensive and enforceable nutrient
management plans be developed, approved and implemented for all agricultural lands throughout
Mar)'land. This act specifically requires that nutrient management plans for nitrogen be
developed and implemented by 2002, and plans for phosphorus be completed by 2005. It is
reasonable to expect that nonpoint loads can be reduced during growing season conditions. The
nutrient load sources during growing season include dissolved forms of the impairing substances
from groundwater, the effects of agricultural ditching and animals in the stream, and deposition of
A "combined sewer s)stem" is a se~cr system in ,.~.hich storm~ater and sanitar) se',',erag¢ are con,.e',ed through a
common set of pipes Ior treatment at a v, aste',,.ater treatment plant. A C S O is an o',,erflov, from such a combined
s'.stem. Baltimore City agreed in the Consent Decree to separate the sanitao and storm'.,,ater tines in the small area
ser,.ed b'. a combined s.', stem and has completed that separation.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMI)I.
Document version: December 14, 2006
37
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
nutrients and organic matter to the strcambed fi'om higher flow events. When these sources are
controlled in combination, it is reasonable to achieve agricultural nonpoint reductions of the
magnitude identified by this TMDL allocation.
Additionally, Howard County is developing a Watershed Restoration Action Strategy for its
portion of the Lower North Branch of the Patapsco River (approximately 38 of 118 square miles).
The county will utilize this strategy to identify and prioritize watershed restoration efforts, which
will include the reduction of nutrient loads from the watershed.
The legislative and policy-derived programs described above will result in significant nutrient
reductions and the achievement of water quality standards for all designated uses in the Baltimore
Harbor except the Deep Channel. Based on information generated in the TMDI. analysis, MDE is
unable to ensure that the Deep Channel Designated Use water quality criterion can be met at all
times that it is applicable. The regions to which the Deep Channel designated use applies
represent approximately 10% of the area of the Harbor. The region subject to potential nonattainment of criteria represents < 5% of'the area of the Harbor. The volume of water that does
not meet the dissolved oxygen criteria represents approximately 3% of the total volume of the
Harbor.
MDE is unable to assure attainment of the Deep Channel Designated Use due to the effects of 170
years of dredging that has incrementally deepened and expanded the size of the Harbors"
navigation channels and their associated turning basins and anchorages. As a result, the Ilarbor
has been h',drologically modified. In a portion of the main navigation channel, from the mouth of
the Harbor to Fort Mcltenry, it has been observed that water from the upper portion of the water
column does not mix with the lower portion of the water column. This observed stratification of
the water column, and the lack of mixing associated with it, occurs every spring/summer/fall. As
a result, there are limited regions within the navigation channel (Deep Channel Designated Use)
that do not meet the dissolved oxygen criteria during the observed spring/summer/fall
stratification period.
Baltimore ttarbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
38
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
REFERENCES
Boicoun, W.C. and P. Olson. A hydrodynamic study of the Baltimore 11arbor system. Tech. Rep.
82-10. Chesapeake Bay Institute, The Johns Hopkins University, MD. 1982.
Boesch, Donald F., Brinsfield, Russell B., Magnien, Robert E.. Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication.
Article Symposium Paper. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30:303-320. 2001.
Boynton, W. R., Burger, N. It., Stankelis, R. M., Robland, FM., llagy Ill, J..D., Frank, J. M.,
Matteson. L. L. and Weir, M..M. An environmental evaluation of Baltimore Harbor with selected
data from Patapsco River. Prepared for Baltimore City Department of Public Works tbr Project
613, Comprehensive Wastewater Facilities Master Plan, University of MaD'land Center for
Environmental Science, Chesapeake Biological Lab., MD. 1998.
Cerco, C.F. and T.M. Cole. Three-dimensional eutrophication model of Chesapeake Bay: Volume
I, main report. Technical Report EI.-94-4, US Army Engineer Waterways I'xperiment Station.
Vicksburg, MS. 1994.
Cerco, C.F. and T.M. Cole. User's guide to the CF~-QUAI,-ICM three-dimensional eutrophication
model. Technical Report EI,-95-15, US Army Engineer Wate~,,.ays Fxperiment Station,
Vicksburg, MS. 1995.
Coastal Environmental Services. Patapsco/Baltimore l tarbor Watershed Study: Ambient
Conditions, Pollutant Loads and Recommendation for Further Action. Prepared for Maryland
Department of the Environment, Coastal Environmental Services. Inc.. Linthicum. MD. 1995.
Code of Federal Regulations. 40 CFR § 130.2 (h).
Code of MaD'land Regulations, 26.08.02.03 B(2), 26.08.02.03-3C(2)(8), 26.08.02.03-3C(8),
26.08.02.03-3C(8)(e)(vi), 26.08.02.03-3C( I 0), 26.08.02.08K(2)(b).
Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC), 1996 National Crop Residue Management
Survey Data. W. l,afayette (IN): Conservation Tillage Information Center, 1996.
DiToro, D. M. and J.J. Fitzpatrick. Chesapeake Bay Sediment Flux Model. Contract Report I-1,93-2, US Army Fngineer Wate~ays l'xperiment Station, Vicksburg. MS, 1993.
Johnson, B. tl., l leath. R.E. and Bernard B. l lsieh. User's Guide for a Three-Dimensional
Numerical tlydrodynamic, Salinity, and Temperature Model of Chesapeake Bay. Technical
Report HL-91-20. US Army Engineer Waterv, ays Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS. 1991.
Liu, I.lui. The Development of a Water Qualit':. Model in Baltimore Ilarbor. Back River. and the
Adjacent Upper Chesapeake Bay. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the School of Marine
Science. The College of William and Mary. Virginia, 2002.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI,
Document version: December 14. 2006
39
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
Magnicn, R.E., Austina, D.K. and B.D. Michael. Chemical/Physical Properties Component. Level
I Data Report ( 1984- 1991). Maryland Department of Environment, Baltimore, MD. 1993.
Mar31and Department of Environment, Patapsco/Back River Watershed Hydrological Simulation
Program Fortran (HSPF) Model Report. 2001.
Maryland Department of Planning. 1997 Reference for Land Use/Land Cover.
Pritchard, D.W., and J.H. Carpenter. Measurements of Turbulent Diffusion in Estuarine and
Inshore Waters. Bull. Inter. Assoc. Sc. Hydrol. 20, 37 pp. 1960.
Robertson, P.G. Back River - An Assessment of Water Quality and Related Fish Mortalities.
Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Administration, Water Qualit>
Service, Annapolis, MD. 133 pp. 1977.
Thomann, Robert V., John A. Muel/er. "Principles or'Surface Water Quality Modeling and
Control." HarperCollins Publisher Inc., New York, 1987.
USDA. Maryland Counties Common Land Units Database. Columbia (MD): Maryland State
Farm Service Agency Office, 1996.
USDA. 1997 Census of Agriculture: Maryland State and County Data. Vol. I, Geographic Area
Series Pan 20. Washington DC: National Agricultural Statistical Service, Issued March 1999.
U.S. EPA. "Ambient Water Quality Criteria for the Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and
Chlorophyll a lbr the Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal Tributaries". EPA Region 111,Chesapeake
Bay Program Office. April 2003.
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program. "'Chesapeake Bay Program: Watershed Model Application
to Calculate Bay Nutrient Loadings: Final Findings and Recommendations," 1996.
U.S. EPA. "'Protocol for Developing Nutrient fMDI.s". EPA 84 I-B-99-007. Office of Water
(4503F), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C. 135 pp. 1999.
U.S. EPA, "Guidance for water quality based decisions: The TMDL process." Office of Water.
Washington D.C., 1991.
U.S. EPA and Maryland Department of the Environment v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore,
Consolidated Case Number: JFM-02-12524, Consent Decree (entered Sept. 30, 2002).
U.S. EPA and Mauland Department of the Environment v. Baltimore County, Consolidated Case
Number: AMD-05-2028, Consent Decree (entered Sept. 20, 2006).
U. S. EPA. Memorandum. Subject: "Establishing Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDI,)
Wasteload Allocations (WLAs) for Storm Water Sources and NPDES Permit Requirements
Based on Those WI,As. Office of Water. Washington. D.C. November, 2002.
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: December 14, 2006
40
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
U.S. EPA, "'Technical Guidance Manual for Developing Total Maximum Daily l,oads, Book 2:
Streams and Rivers. Part I: Biochemical Oxygen Demand/Dissolved Oxygen and Nutrients/
l-utrophication," Office of Water. Washington D.C. March 1997.
Wang, Harry V., Liu. Hui, Park, Kycong Park. "'The Development of a Water Quality Model for
Baltimore Harbor. Back River and the Adjacent Upper Chesapeake Bay." Special Report No. 386
in Applied Science and Ocean Engineering. Virginia Institute of Marine Science. School of
Marine Science. College of William and Mar,,'. Gloucester Point, VA. May, 2004.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI,
Document version: December 14, 2006
41
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
BALTIMORE llARBOR NUTRIENTS TMDLS
APPENDIX A: Baseline Scenario Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Altainment Assessment
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: November 29. 2006
AI
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
APPENDIX A
Baseline Scenario Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Attainment Assessment
How to Read the CFD Reference/Attainment Curve Graphs: Following the tv, o adopted
CBP Reference Curves below, the figures in this appendix for assessment of baseline
scenario DO criteria attainment are graphs expressing time (vertical axis) and volume
(horizontal axis) from 0-100% (the entire area of the graph). Where the attainment curve
is below the reference curve there is depicted an area of"allowable" exceedance (Le.. the
criterion is attained). Where the attainment curve is above the reference curve, there is
depicted a certain percentage of"non-allowable" criteria exceedance (nonattainment).
This percentage is calculated both for time (vertically) and volume (horizontally) as that
area between the two curves taken as a fraction of the total time-volume expressed by the
entire area of the graph (100% of time and volume). For example, in Figure A4 below.
"Baseline Scenario I)O Criteria Attainment Assessment for the Migratory Fish Spawning
and Nursery Designated Use", the area between the solid line of the reference curve and
the dotted line of the attainment curve, where it is rises above the reference cura,e, is
equal to 3% of the entire time and space depicted, and is therefore considered to represent
a criteria exceedance of 3%.
For the dissolved oxygen (DO) criteria assessment of the baseline conditions scenario in
the Baltimore Ilarbor, the reference curves established by the Chesapeake Bay Program
(CBP) were used for ()pen Water and Deep Water Designated Use Habitats. The
Migratory Fish and Spawning Nursery Designated Use analysis ,,,,as conducted using the
Open Water reference curve. The Deep Channel Designated Use does not have an
established reference curve. The attainment assessment for this designated use during the
baseline conditions scenario is presented at the end of this appendix.
Bakimore I larbor Nutrient T M D L
Document version: ,June 2, 2006
A2
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
g~
!!
OpenWaterI)OReferenceCurve
,o
40
,~ ~. ,,.o
10
20
~C'
40
S0
60
70
80
1~
90
Percentage ot ~ea,~iOlt.~e E.~ceeflingme Criteria
Figure AI: CBP DO Criteria Reference Curve for Defining Criteria Attainment in
the Open Water Designated Use Habitats
100
"=
DeepWaterDORefi:renceCurve
80
~
70
L
~
~
i
,
~
~
Areaof"allov,'ablc"
CriteriaExceedance
40
_~o 30
0
8
10
~
:b3
40
~0
60
70
80
99
1(30
Percnntagaof Area/VolumeE x ~ i r ~ ~e Crit~ia
Figure A2: CBP DO Criteria Reference Curve for Defining Criteria Attainment in
Deep Water Designated Use Habitats
The attainment assessment procedure is as follo~,,s: First, using the calibrated model DO
output fbr the baseline conditions scenario period (I 995- 1997) DO attainment curves are
developed for the Migratoo' Fish and Spawning, Open Water and Deep Water
Designated Uses. The development o f the attainment curve is based on the estimates of
spatial exceedance percentages for all data available during the assessment period.
Baltimore !larbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: June 2, 2006
A3
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Second, the CBP reference curves are obtained in the appropriate software format. Third,
the MDE-generated attainment curves are compared to the corresponding CBP reference
curves. MDE quantifies the degree o f criteria attainment or exceedance based on the
amount o f area or volume o f a specific designated use region that meets or exceeds the
criteria.
1
I
0
I.
"eCJ
i
I
0.8
06
Ill
0
E
i=
I
Solid lane = CBP Rel;zrence Curve
Dotted lane = MI)E Attainment Curve
Percent Nonattainmcnt = 3%
Area o f "n on-allo',,,'able"
i
/criteria e×ceedance
0.4 "~'.,
//
Areaof"allowable•'
GI
C
g
Q.
• . ...
o
I
I
0.2
0.4.
" "I,
0.6
I
0.B
Percentage of Volume Exceeding the Criteria
Figure A3: Baseline Scenario DO Criteria Attainment Assessment for the Migrator)'
Fish Spawning and Nurse~" Designated Use for the period February 1 - May 31
The Baltimore l larhor attainment curve (dotted line) is compared to the CBP reference
curve (solid line). The analysis indicates that the designated use is not attaining its
criteria for 3% o f the time and area assessed•
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient T M D L
Document "~ersion: June 2, 2006
A4
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial
05/29/2009
FINAL
Solid L i n e = C B P R e f e r e n c e C u r ' , e
D o t t e d Line = M D E A t l a i n m e n t Cur,,e
O
Percent Nonattainment
= 3%
-~ 0 a
.L
O
12
¢J
X
~J
'
A r e a o f " n o n - a l l o ~ able"
exceedance
E
'v- 0.4
g
Area of "allowable"
criteria
O
~ 0.2
Q.
•
0
O
•
.
,
1
I
0,2
0.4
.
.
,
.......
,
"1 . . . . . .
0.6
, .....
4 ........
0.8
Percentage of Volume Exceedin~ the Criteria
Figure A4: Baseline Scenario DO Criteria Attainment Assessment for the Open
Water Designated Use for the period June 1 - September 30
The DO criteria attainment assessment for the Open Water Designated Use for the period
June I n to September 31 s~ indicates that there is an area of nonattainment of 3%.
Baltimore I larbor Nutrient TMDL
Document version: June 2, 2006
A5
~OO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
1
I
I
Solid I,ine = C B P H.elierencc Cur,.e
})otted I,ine -: M D E Attainment Curve
Percent Nonattainn'tent 2%
•
"C
U
0.8
C
~J
"'.
iz
Area of"non-allov.able'"
.
E
0.4
riteria e×ceeaance
• ".
..
~
.
~
.
.
,
~
.........
Area o f " a l l o ~ a b l e "
criteria e x c e c d a n c c
C
~ 02
O
O
I
0.2
I
0.4
1 .....
0.6
; .....
I ....
O.B
,,...
Percentage of Volume Exceeding the CHteria
Figure AS: Baseline Scenario D O Criteria A t t a i n m e n t A s s e s s m e n t for the O p e n
W a t e r D e s i g n a t e d U s e for the period O c t o b e r I - ,lanuary 31
The EK) criteria attainment assessment for the Open Water Designated Use for the period
October 1st to January 31 st indicates that there is an area o f nonattainment o f 2%.
Baltimore tlarbor Nutrient T M I ) L
Document ",ersion: June 2, 2006
A6
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Q
Solid L i n e = C B P R e f e r e n c e C u n ' c
Dotted l,ine
MI)E Attainment Curve
Percent Nonattainrncnt ~ 23"/,
• •.
0.8
1=
'~ 0 6
,
Area o f"non-allo~ able ''
criteria e x c e c d a n c c
L~
E
0,4
"6
g
C
~ 0.,2
0.
0
I
I
I
I
0.2
0.+
0.6
O.B
Percentage
of V o l u m e E x c e e d i n g
the C r i t e r i a
Figure A6: DO Criteria Attainment Assessment for the Deep Water Designated Use
for the period June I - September 30
The DO criteria attainment assessment for the Deep Water Designated Use for the period
June ISt to September 30 Lh •mdncates
.
that there is an area ofnonattainment of 23%.
]here is no DO reference curve for the Deep Channel Designated Use. which applies in
the area below the lower boundary of the pycnocline to the sediment/water interface from
June 1-September 30. Tberefore. MDE developed an attainment analysis methodology.
The methodology consisted ofevaluating the water qualit), model DO output for the
Deep Channel habitat against the 1.0 mg/I instantaneous minimum DO concentration
required• The Deep Channel I)esignatcd Use attainment analysis result indicates that
nonattainment of the water quality criteria occurs 87% of the time and volume•
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI.
Document version: June 2, 2006
A7
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
BALTIMORE HARBOR NUTRIENTS TMDI.S
APPENDIX B: TMDL Scenario Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Attainment Assessment
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL
Document vcrsion: November 29, 2006
BI
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
FINAl.
Appendix B
T M D L Scenario Dissolved Oxygen Criteria Attainment A~qessment
The dissolved oxygen (DO) criteria attainment assessment for the TMDL scenario in the
Baltimore Harbor is provided below. The assessment procedure is the ~ m e as that
described in Appendix A.
I
I
I
Solid l_ inc = C B P Reference C u r ' . e
Dotted Line = M I ) E Attainment C u r i e
Percent Nt)nattainment = 0%
0
0.8
U
.C
X
W
Area o f"allov, able'*
criteria excecdancc
E
~= 0.4
C
~ o.2
0
I-
o
0.2
0.4
0.6
D.B
Percentage of Volume Exceeding the Criteria
Figure B h T M D L Scenario DO Criteria Attainment A~sessment for the Migratory
Fish Spawning and Nursery Designated Use for the period February 1 - May 31
The Baltimore tlarbor attainment curve (dotted line) is compared to the CBP reference
curve (solid line). The analysis indicates that the attainment curve remains completely
belov, the reference cun,e. This resu;ts in the designated use meeting its criteria with 0%
nonattainment.
Baltimore l larbor Nutrient T M D L
Document Date: September 5, 2006
132
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
I
I
I
Solid l.ine - CB P Reference Cur', c
l~'~ttcd Linc = MDE Attainment Cur'.e
Percent Nonattainmcnt = 0%
O
"C 0.8
O
..c
C
06
O
W
E
\
O4
g
N
C
iIu
:
0.2
"~,,~
A r e a ol " a l l o ~ a b l e "
i . . . . . . . ~ i a
excccdancc
I1.
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
D.B
Percentage of Volume Exceeding the Criteria
Figure B2: T M D L Scenario I)O Criteria Attainment Assessment for the Open
Water Designated Use for the period June I - September 30
The Baltimore Harbor attainment curve (dotted line) is compared to the CBP reference
curve (solid line). The analysis indicates that the attainment curve remains completely
below the reti:rence curve. This results in the designated use meeting its criteria with 0%
nonattainment.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient T M D L
Document Date: September 5, 2006
B3
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
I
Solid
l)otted
°O
~
"C
Percent
I
I.inc
Line
= CBP
I
Refierencc
= MDE
Attainment
Nonattainment
Cur~e
Cur,,e
~ 0%
0.8
C
'508
X
"~- 0.4
Arca o f "allo,.,.able'"
O
'.
CXcccdanc~
0.2
;
• . . . • .....
,
0.2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I
,
0.4
I
0.6
....
, .....
t .......
0,8
t
t.
Percentoge of Volume Exceeding the Crlte
to
Figure B3: TMDL Scenario DO Criteria Attainment Assessment for the Open
Water Designated Use for the period October 1 - January 31
The Baltimore Harbor attainment curve (dotted line) is compared to the ('BP reference
curve (solid line). A visual analysis of the reference curve plot indicates that the
attainment cun, e rises slightly above the reference curve. The numerical values obtained
from the output of the attainment program shows a 0.00 or 0% non-attainment.
Therefore, it is estimated that the DO exceedance in time and volume time represented by
this area should be between 0.000 and 0.005 (between 0% and 0.5%) in time and volume,
otherwise if higher than 0.005, the numerical value of the program output v, ould
approximate to the next decimal shov, ing a 0.01 or I% exccedance. Based on the reviev,
of the reference curve program model output• MDE concludes that this specific
designated use meets its DO criteria.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient T M D L
Document I)ate: September 5, 2006
1:14
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
05/29/2009
(Unofficial)
FINAL
11
I
!
[
I
Solid Line = ClIP Rcti:rcnce Cur;'e
Dotted I.ine = M I ) E A n a i n m e n t Cur~e
Percent N o n a n a i n m e n l = 7%
O
"E
I
0.8 [""'.
t
E
~oe
"",
Area
E
of"non-allo;',able"
criteria cxcccdance
X
0.4
C
~ 0.2
0.
(~
I
I
I
1
0.2
0.4
0.6
D.B
laercantoge of Volume Exceeding the Criteria
Figure B4: T M D L Scenario DO Criteria Attainment Assessment for the Deep
Water Designated Use for the period June 1 - September 30
The Baltimore 1larbor attainment curve (dotted line) is compared to the CBP reference
curve (solid line). The DO criteria attainment assessment for the Deep Water Designated
Use indicates that there is an area of nonatlainment of 7%. The Deep Water Designated
Use DO criteria allows a variance of up to 7% applied spatially and/or temporally from
June I to September 30 (COMAR 26.08.02.03-3 C (8) (e) (vi)), therefore, the assessment
oftbe DO criteria indicates that the Deep Water designated use is attained.
There is no DO reference curve for the Deep Channel Designated Use, which applies in
the area below the lower boundary of the pycnocline to the sediment/water interface from
June I st to September 30 th. Therefore, MDE developed an attainment analysis
methodology. The methodology consisted of evaluating the water quality model DO data
for the Deep Channel habitat against the 1.0 mg/I instantaneous minimum DO
concentration required. The Deep Channel Designated Use attainment analysis result
indicates that nonattainment of the water quality criteria occurs 78.5% of the time and
volume.
Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDI,
Document Date: September 5, 2006
B5
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
BALTIMORE HARBOR NUTRIENTS TMDLS
APPENDIX C: Potential TMDL Allocations by Source Category
Baltimore tlarbor Nutrient T M D L
Document version: November 29, 2006
CI
0
0
0
0
I
Fli~AL
0
0
0
Ba~more
M
Hartxx TMOL Annual Average TN Allocations
'0
S 418¢49
5 32~g6~
~6~*~
L ~ I ~ h ~ m POt~T S4~JRCES
L ~.l~l from MOE HSpF W I t S * I ~ I
0
~4~ SLINE41~- ......................................................
~.
OJ
F-'
0
U1
0
0
TT~~ .
NOvm'~ef 29 200~
IP~
C2
M~4)
L~
~
FA
r~
0
0
~o
0
0~
0
FINAL
I
0
0
0
Ln
Baltimore
Harbor
TMDL Annual
Average
TP Allocations
M
Loads t t o m Id D ( HS~F W a t ~ l ~ d
HM,eb~ Ar~*'t:alA ~
N~HJ~L
19~510 1997
0
f)
[ 12% o( TC~ HSPF TP LOad)
(15 6% of TOall m )
(75% O~ TO~d l~of Tp Lold)
(55 0% 0d ~11 al~4)
( 12% O* Total H~J~- l "~ Lo a ~
(28 ~'% ~ 1 c4al A ~ I 0 7% d~wac¢~
0
(31
~o
0
0
~o
I~I
M O S is A p p r o x i m a t e l y 5% of R e d u c e d Agricultural Loads
~
I ~
I ~
I ~
TMDL
IPS
I
.
\
I~S41
I ' ' ' ~ ' I ~o~ I
-..~f
243 1~'7
DoclJme~t
ver~c~
November
29. 2 0 0 6
C3
\
L~
~
IdOS
~
FA
r~
o
o
o
¢h
o
I
0
0
0
Bul~lmore Harbor TMDL Grow~nO Selton
M
TN Allocations
0
fl
,4~
~ V , ~
~*
:~ . ~
I ~
f'~l~
~ "~ k~.,~
i~'% ~ °,~m ~ , ' ~
~h ~ , N ,
0
~0
0
0
~0
~o.
~
*
~
LA
m~S
FA
0
0
0
Ch
0
RNAL
I
0
0
0
Baltimore HarlDor TMDL G l o w i n g S e a l o n TP AllOCations
M
0
0
0
U1
~o
0
0
~o
fA
r'~
~
~~ .
~ , . ~-~-~
FA
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
FINAL
Technical Memorandum
Significant Nutrient Point Sources in the Baltimore Harbor (Patapsco
River Mesohaline) Watershed
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires that Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
allocations account for all significant sources oftbe impairing pollutant or pollutants. The
TMDL analysis for Baltimore !larbor addresses the total nitrogen ('12q) and total phosphorus
(TP) loads for the growing season conditions (May-October) and for average annual conditions.
This technical memorandum identifies, in detail, the significant surface water discharges of TN
and TP used as modeling input when computing the TMDLs. These are conceptual values that
are within the TMDL thresholds. Whereas, actual effluent limits and related permit conditions
will be established at the time of permit issuance or renewal through the permit process. The
Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) expressly reserves the right to allocate the
loads among different sources using the above mentioned permit process in any manner that is
reasonably calculated to achieve water quality standards.
Potential waste load allocations have been identified for National Pollutant Elimination System
(NPDES)-regulated municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants and municipal separate
stormwater discharges in the Baltimore Ilarbor Watershed. There are two municipal wastewater
treatment plants (WWTP) contributing nutrient loads to the Baltimore Harbor: the Patapsco
WWTP and the Cox Creek WWTP. In addition to these two municipal WWTPs, there are five
industrial point sources contributing to the total nutrients load into the Harbor: International
Steel Group (1SG), WR Grace, Eracbem-Comilog, US Gypsum, and Millenium Specialty.
Waste load allocations have been identified tbr these point sources based on their permitted or
actual discharge flows. Potential annual waste load allocations are also identified for five
jurisdictions with municipal stormwater discharges in the Baltimore I larbor Watershed to
address nutrient loads from urban sources during storm events. Baltimore City, Baltimore
County, Anne Arundel County, Carroll County and Howard Count)' are all covered under
NPDES Phase 1 stormwater permits. Potential annual waste load allocations have been identified
lbr these stormwater discharges based on the 1995-1997 watershed model. The stormwater
nutrient loads account for contributions from urban land. The land use in|brmation was based on
1997 Maryland Department of Planning data.
The nutrient reductions for point sources, reflected in the TMDL analysis, are designed to protect
water quality in the Baltimore Ilarbor and the Chesapeake Bay. It is likely, however, that future
Chesapeake Bay Agreement nutrient goals may entail more ambitious point source nutrient
reductions to protect the water quality of the Bay.
Tables la and Ib and 2a and 2b below identify provide the potential allocations of the nutrients
nitrogen and phosphorus attributed to the point sources in the Baltimore Harbor: municipal and
industrial WWI'Ps, and NPDES urban stormwater discharges. These allocations were used in the
Baltimore Harbor Eutrophication Model (BtlEM) simulation for the growing season and average
annual conditions.
Baltimore l tarbor T M D L Nutrients
Document version: November 29, 2006
I
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Table la
Loads Attributed to Point Sources (WWTPs) Used to Compute the
G r o w i n g Season TMDL (May I ~t - October 31 ~t)
Point Source Name
Permit Number
Nutrient Loads
(Ibs/growing season)
Flow
Concentration (mR~I)
TN
TP
(MGD)
TN
TP
MD0021601
333.330
33,330
73
3
0.3
MD0021661
68.484
6.852
15
3
0.3
MDO001201-101
31.795
264
0.864
24.2
0.2
MI)0001201.4112
304,590
15,230
50
4
02
MDO001201-014
158,388
7,632
26
4
0.19
MI)0001201-017
17,058
2,814
2.8
4
0.66
Group(ISGI
MDO001201-021
52,392
2,622
8.6
4
0.2
'~. R. GrlKe
MD@000311
155.370
1.236
4.066
25
0.2
Erathem-('omilog
MDO0O1775
47.502
6
0.128
244
0.03
1'S Gypsum
MD0001457
192
30
0 007
18
3
Milleoium
MD0001279-001
4,338
0
0.080
35.58
0
Millenimm
M D0001279-002
6,750
0
0.545
8.13
0
C'ox (.'reekDMCF
52.601
2.556
1.2
28.8
1.4
lo(al
1.232.790
72.572
N/A
N/A
NIA
Pitla p..~o
W~TP
Cox Creek
'd,~'l'p
International Steel
GroupIISC~
Inlermallonml St¢¢1
C;rouplX~;~
International Stt~l
CroupI'-~.I
In ter.ational Steel
Gre~p IIS(;~
International Steel
Table lb
Loads Attributed to Point Sources (Urban Stormwater) Used to Compute the
Growin Season TMDL May I"- October 31")
Point Source Name Permit Number
Baltimore Ci~
For (;ro~ing .oRL~oa
TMDL
Atm¢ Arund¢l Coun P,"
For Growing .¢,¢L~oa
"IMDL
Baltimore Coulty
For Growing Set, on
TMm.
Carroll County
For (;rowing SelL,On
1MI)I.
IIo~ard Count)
For (;rowing S¢llsoa
IMDL
Nutrient Loads
(Ibs/growing season)
TN
TP
MD0068292
102,306
10,164
MD0068306
73,662
7,314
M1)0068314
167,784
16,662
MD0068331
28,644
2,844
MD0068322
36,828
3.660
409.224
40.644
Total
Baltimore Ilarbor TMDI. Nutrients
Document version: November 29, 2006
2
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Table 2a
Loads Attributed to Point Sources (WWTPs) Used to Compute
the Avera[~e Annual Conditions T M D L
{v%*trient Loads (Ibs~,ear)
Point Source Name
Flow
Concentration (mg/I)
Permit Number
TN
TP
(MGD)
TN
TP
Pataps¢o
WWTP
MD0021601
889,453
66,709
73
4
0.3
Cox ('reek
M I)0021661
182,764
I 3,707
15
4
0.3
lnternat/onal Steel Group MD000] 201-101
63,590
526
0.864
24.2
0.2
,nternationalSteelGroup
MD0001201-012
609,185
30,459
50
4
0,2
Internatlonal Steel G roap MI)OOQ1201-014
316,776
] 5,267
26
4
0.2
International Sle¢l Groap
(]SG)
MI)O001201-01"1
34,114
5,625
28
4
0.66
International Steel G roup MI)O001201-O21
II~(;~
104,785
5,240
8.6
4
0.2
I,.~;I
ps6~
Ils<;~
V,. [~ Gra~e
M D0000311
3 ] 0,737
2,475
4.066
25
0.2
Erachem~'omilog
M I)0001775
95.000
12
0.128
244
0.03
US Gypsum
MI)0001457
384
(:,4
0.007
18
3
Millenium
M 1)0001279-001
8,670
0
0.080
35.58
0
Millcnium
M DO001279-002
13,495
0
0.545
8.13
0
Cox Creek DMCF
462,164
7,240
1.2/20"
28.8/38*
1.4/0.3"
Iolal
3,() c) I, I 17
147,324
N ,'A
N/A
N 'A
*Cox Creek I)MCI. estimated discharge o f 1.2 mgd; I N = 28.8 mg/l and l P = 1.4 mg/I fi'om April I Io January 3 I
From Fehruar) I to March 31 (maximum acfi~it) period) discharge ot'20 mgd: I N = 38 mg"l and I P = 0.3 mg/I.
]'able 2b
Loads Attributed to Point Sources (Urban Stormwater) Used to Compute
the Average Annual Conditions TMDL
Nutrient Loads (Ibs/year)
Point Source Name
Flow
Concentration (rag~I)
Permit Number
TN
TP
(MGD)
TN
TP
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N,"A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N,'A
N/A
Baltirnore Cily
For Average Annual TMDL
M1)0~68314
221,274
Anne Arundel Comnty
For AveraRe Aanual r M D L
MD0068306
159,318
Baltlmore Count)
For Average Annul T M D L
MI)OQ08292
362,89~)
CarrollCouaty
For Averal~eAnnmal "IMDL
How|rd County
For Averse AnnHI TMDI.
M I~068331
61,957
M1)0068322
79,659
8,622
N/A
N/A
N/A
885,098
95.803
N 'A
N ~A
N/A
Total
Baltimore Itarbor TMDI. Nutricnts
Document version: November 29, 2006
23,95 I
17,245
39,279
6,706
3
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
Technical Memorandum
Significant Nutrient Nonpoint Sources in the Baltimore Harbor
(Patapsco River Mesohaline) Watershed
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency requires that Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDI,)
allocations account lbr all significant sources of each impairing pollutant. This technical
memorandum identifies, in detail, the significant nonpoint sources (NPS) of total nitrogen (TN) and
total phosphorus (TP) in the Baltimore Ilarbor watershed and their distribution between different
land uses. Details are provided for allocating NPS loads for nutrients to different land use
categories. These are conceptual values that are within the TMDI, thresholds. The Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE) expressly reserves the right to allocate the TMDLs among
different sources in any manner that is reasonably calculated to achieve water quality standards.
TMDLs are being established in the Baltimore Harbor watershed for both growing season and
average annual conditions. The NPS loads that were used in the model account lbr all sources
including both natural and human- induced components. The growing season NPS loads and the
average annual NPS loads were both estimated using the Hydrological Simulation Program Fortran
(HSPF) model. As explained in the main document, the simulation of the Baltimore Harbor
Watershed used the following assumptions: (1) variability in patterns of precipitation were
estimated from existing National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
meteorological stations; (2) hydrologic responses of land areas were estimated for a simplified set
of land uses in the basin; and (3) agricultural information was estimated from the Maryland
Department of Planning (MDP) land use data, the 1997 Agricultural Census Data, and the Farm
Service Agency (FSA). The nutrient loads account for contributions from atmospheric deposition
to land, septic tanks, cropland, pasture, l~edlots, and forest. Urban land contributions are included
in the point sources technical memorandum. The land use information was based on 1997 MDP
data. These percentages were then applied to the TMDL loads estimated from MDE observed data.
The nutrient reductions for nonpoint sources, reflected in the TMDL analysis, are designed to
protect water qualib' in the Baltimore Harbor and the Chesapeake Bay. It is likely, however, that
future Chesapeake Bay Agreement goals may entail more ambitious nonpoint source nutrient
reductions to protect the water qualit3,' of the Bay.
Tables la and Ib provide one possible scenario for the distribution of the growing season nitrogen
and phosphorus NPS loads between different land use categories. Tables 2a and 2b provide one
possible scenario for the distribution of average annual nitrogen and phosphorus NPS loads
between different land use categories. Tables 3a and 3b present the agricultural and forest loads
distributed by jurisdictions for the growing season TMDI,s. Tables 4a and 4b present the
agricultural and forest loads distributed by jurisdictions for the Average Annual TMDLs. These
distributions are based on percentages of each particular land use in each jurisdiction relative to the
total area of that land use in the watershed.
Baltimore I larbor TMDL Nutrients
Document version: September 6, 2006
20090603-0005 FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl+
"Fable la
Nonpoint Source Nitrogen Loads Attributed to
Significant Land Uses for Baltimore Harbor Growing Season TMDLs
Laud Use
Category
Percentage of Nonpoint
Source I.oad
TN Nonpoint Source
Load (Ibs/growing
seasofl t
Mixed Agricultural
Forest and Other Herbaceous
Septics
43.9 %
15.5 %
40.6 %
201,792
7t,502
186,618
100.0%
459,912
Total
Table Ib
Nonpoint Source Phosphorus Loads Attributed to
Significant Land Uses for Baltimore Ilarbor Growing season TMDLs
Land Use
Category
Percentage of Nonpoint
Source Load
TP Nonpoint Source
I,oad (Ibs/growiug
season)
Mixed Agricultural
Forest and Other Herbaceous
Septics
47.0 %
53.0 %
0.0 %
6,006
6,768
0
Total
100.0 %
12,774
Atmospheric deposition to land surfaces is included in the loads attributed re, mixed agriculture, forest and
other herbaceous, and urban land uses.
Table 2a
Nonpoint Source Nitrogen Loads Attributed to
Significant Land Uses for Baltimore ltarbor Average Annual TMDLs
Land Use
Categor~
Percentage of Nonpoint
Source Load
TN Nonpoint Source
t.oad ~lbs/~r)
Mixed Agricultural
Forest and Other Herbaceous
Septics
53.8 %
17.4 %
28.8%
670,730
216,216
359,090
Total
100.0 %
1,246,036
Baltimore llarbor "I'MDL Nutrients
Document version: September 6, 2006
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Table 2b
Nonpoint Source Phosphorus Loads Attributed to
Significant Land Uses for Baltimore Harbor Average Annual TMDLs
Land Use
Category
TP Nonpoint Source
Loud~lbs/~r)
Percentage of Nonpoint
Source Load
Mixed Agricultural
Forest and Other Herbaceous
Septics
46.0 %
54.0%
Total
100.0 %
15,929
18,725
0
0%
34,654
Almospheric deposilion to land surfaces is included in Ibc loads attributed to mixed agriculture, Iorest and
other herbaceous, and urban rand uses,
Table 3a
Agricultural Loads by Jurisdiction
for Baltimore Harbor Growing Season TMDLs
Jurisdiction
%of
Agricultural
Land within
Watershed
Anne
Arundel
Growing
Growing
Season
Season
Agricultural Agricultural
TN Load
TP Load
(Ibs/srason)
(Ibs/season)
4%
7,720
230
0.0~24%
5
0
26%
52,864
1,573
43%
87,539
2,605
Howard
County
27%
53,664
1,597
Totals
100%
201,792
6,006
County
Baltimore
City
Baltimore
County
Carroll
County
Baltimore I larbor TMDL Nutrients
Document version: September 6, 2006
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Table 3b
Forest Loads by Jurisdiction
for Baltimore Harbor Growing Season TMDLs
Jurisdiction
Growing
Growing
% of Forest
Season Forest Season Forest
Land within
TN Load
TPLoad
Watershed
(Ibs~eason)
(Ibs~eason)
Anne
Arundel
County
22%
15,710
1.487
Baltimore
(;it)'
4%
3,169
30(]
Baltimore
County
36%
26.062
2,467
Carroll
County
15%
10.762
1.019
Iloward
County
220/0
15,799
1,495
Totals
100%
71.502
6.768
T a b l e 4a
Agricultural Loads by .Jurisdiction
for Baltimore Itarbor Average Annual TMDLs
Jurisdiction
% of
Agricultural
Land within
Watershed
Anne
Arund¢l
County
4%
Baltimore
City.
0.0024%
Baltimore
County
26%
Carroll
County
43%
IIowurd
County
2 7o/0
Totals
I (X)%
Baltimore Harbor TMDL Nutrients
Document version: September 6, 2006
Annual
Annual
Agricultural Agricultural
TN Load
TP Load
(Ibs/yeur)
(Ibs/year)
25,660
609
16
0
175,712
4.173
290,968
6,910
178,373
4.236
670,730
15.929
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
Table 4b
Forest Loads by Jurisdiction
for Baltimore Harbor Average Annual TMDLs
Jurisdiction
% of Forest
Land within
Watershed
Anne
Arundel
Annual
Forest
TN Load
(Ibs/year)
Annual
Forest
TP Load
(Ibs/year)
47.509
4,114
9.581
830
78,809
6,825
32.542
2.818
47,775
4.137
216,216
18,725
22%
County
Baltimore
Cit~
4%
Baltimore
County
36%
Carroll
County
15%
Howard
Coon ty
Totals
Baltimore ttarbor TMDI. Nutrients
Document version: September 6, 2006
100%
5
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Comment Response Document Regarding the Total Maximum Daily Loads of Nitrogen
and Phosphorus for the Baltimore Harbor in Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll and
Howard Counties and Baltimore City., Maryland
The Mars'land Department of the Environment (MDE) has conducted a public review of the
proposed Total Maximum Daily Loads (FMDLs) of Nitrogen and Phosphorus for the Baltimore
Harbor. The public comment period was open from June 6. 2006 through July 5, 2006. MDE
received five sets of written comments.
Below is a list of commentors, their affiliation, the date comments were submitted, and the
numbered references to the comments submitted. In the pages that follow, comments are
summarized and listed with MDE's response.
List of Commentors
Author
Affiliation
Date
,,
Michael P. Bonk
Steven Stewart
Mary, Searing
Kim Coble, Beth McGee
Michael P. Bonk
Kim Coble
Anne Arundel County,
Department of Public Works
Baltimore County, Watershed
Management and Monitorin~
Anne Arundel County, Office
of "Environmental and
Cultural Resources
Chesapeake Ba~,' Foundation
Anne Arundel County,
Department of Public Works
Chesapeake Bav Foundation
,,, ,,,,,,
Comment
Number
,
,
July 3, 2006
1 through 1 I
July 5, 2006
12 through 14
July 5, 2006
15 through 25
July,' 6, 2006
26 throush 30
July 6, 2006
31
Sept. 21, 2006
Appendix A
Comments and Responses
I. The commentor states that the point source data used for the baseline modeling appears
somewhat dated, 1992-1997" this data is as much as 10 years old. The commentor continues
that much improvement in point source nutrient reductions has occurred.
Response: MDE is aware that significant improvements in point source loads reductions
have occurred since 1997. A TMDL, which by definition is the assimilative capacity of an
impairing substance that a waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards, is
independent of the baseline loads. The monitoring data is necessary for the calibration of the
model and to estimate percent reductions but will not aft~ct the assimilative capacity of the
waterbody. The modeling efforts started in 1998; the Department used the best data that was
readily available at that time.
. Thc commentor references page 35. Section 5: MDE states that the Enhanced Nutrient
Reduction (ENR) program provides cost-share grant funds to local governments to retrofit or
upgrade Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs).... The commentor states that the "flush
Document version: December 14, 2006
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
tax" was incorporated at the added burden of the local governments to pay for these upgrades
and asks `.,,'hat happened to paying 100% of eligible ENR costs?
Response: There was a t)pographical error in this portion of the paragraph. This error has
been corrected and this portion of the paragraph nov,. states: "The Enhanced Nutrient
Reduction (ENR) program provides grant funds to local governments to retrofit or upgrade
Wastewater Treatment Plants (WW'I'Ps) from BNR to ENR at their currentl) approved
design capacit) ."
. The commentor references page 35, Section 5: MDE states that upon completion of the ENR
upgrades, subsequent National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits for
the municipal WWTPs will include nutrient limits. The commentor asks how is MDE going
to handle if current permits expire prior to completion of ENR upgrades. The commentor
also asks if the TMDL will rake effect before it is determined whether loading limits can be
achieved.
Response: Performance standards and a schedule for implementing ENR upgrades are
t)pically set forth in an ENR agreement with the aftccted jurisdiction. Schedules and
performance standards are established with consideration to, among other things, the waste
stream received by the facility, the complexity of the engineering involved, and the
availabilib' of State and local resources. The ENR schedule, which in isolated cases may
need to exceed the maximum five-year term of an NPDES permit, and performance standards
will be referenced in any applicable NPDES permit. Effluent limits based upon operation of
ENR technology ,.,,'ill become effective following completion and start-up of ENR upgrades.
. The commentor references page 35. Section 5; the last paragraph states: "The
implementation of nonpoint source nutrient controls that v, ill attempt to meet the water
quality standards in the Harbor...." The commentor states that this sounds half-hearted and
again sounds as if point source controls are taking the brunt of the Chesapeake Bay clean up.
The commentor asks ',,,'hat assurances do the point sources have that MI)E ',',ill push the
nonpoint source community and in what kind oftimeframe.
Response: Please rel;er to the Assurance of Implementation Section of the I M D L report.
This section has been updated and presents several initiatives and programs that provide
reasonable assurance that the TMDL NPS load allocations can and will be implemented in
order to achieve water quality standards. For example, reductions can be achieved through:
stormwater NPDES permits; the upgrade of sanitary sewer systems and the upgrade or
separation of combined sev"er systems; cooperative agricultural reductions such as
Maryland's Water Quality Improvement Act that requires that comprehensive and
enforceable nutrient management plans be developed, approved and implcmcnted for all
agricultural lands throughout Maryland; and Watershed Restoration Action Strategies
(WRAS). The timeframe for implementation of these and other programs are specific for
each. Maryland's Tributary Strategies implementation plan is still under development but
previous draft plans require that reductions be implemented by 2010.
Document version: December 14, 2006
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
. The commentor reterences the Point Source Technical Memorandum. The commentor states
that if the County has interpreted the tables in this memorandum correctly, "Fables la, lb, 2a,
2b show the industrial point source has not been required to keep up with nutrient removal
technology via permit limits as have municipal plants. Table la sho~vs International Steel
Group (ISG)-101, a "'major" industrial at 0.86 mgd flow, is allowed a TN concentration of 49
rag/I; WR Grace, listed as a flow of 4.0 mgd, is allowed a TN concentrationof25 mg/I. The
commentor states that these limits appear to be quite high. The commentor states there are
some dischargers not even listed. The commentor asks why aren't private entities held to the
same standard.
R e s p o n s e : The only economical option tor reducing nutrient Ioadings at Publicly-Owned
Treatment Works (POTWs) is through end of pipe treatment. Other options for significant
loading reductions are available at industrial sources. The ability to implement pollution
prevention, wastewater-reuse, production line changes, and product changes renders effluent
concentration levels as a misleading measure of progress for such facilities. Both of the
referenced industrial facilities have achieved significant reductions in nutrient Ioadings. W.R.
Grace continues to implement process and product revisions to continue to achieve further
reductions in nutrient Ioadings. The Department considered an additional treatment
requirements at ISG-101 that will be reflected in the current pending NPDES permit renewal
process and have resulted in a "IN reduction in that outfall from 49 mg/I to 24 mg/I.
. Noting that the report references an annual average concentration ot"4 mg/l as a limit for the
municipal point sources, the Commentor asks, in light of the recent D.C. Circuit decision
interpreting "daily" to require daily loads to be identified in all instances, how MDE is
planning to handle setting "daily" limits/loads? By only setting the two seasonal limits of 3
mg/I and 5 rag/l? The commentor states that if this is so, then the growing season limit of 3
mg/I will not allow tbr any operational flexibility within the plant since 3 mg/I is the absolute
limit of technology. The commentor states that the difference between loading based on
4mg/I and 3 mg/I was considered to be growth.
The Department does not anticipate any significant change in plans to apply two
seasonal limits in the discharge permit that will be required to implement the TMDL.
Response:
. The commentor asks whether MDE will allow for offsets/credits for a facility if final effluent
goes to an alternate source for reuse. If so, the Commentor asks whether an implementation
plan been considered? Finally, the Commentor asks tbr an example of how credits maybe
formulated.
Response: The Department is examining a number of potential options regarding
offsets/credits, and is receiving comments and suggestions from a variety of stakeholders
regarding this concept. MDE invites the commentor or any other agency or group to provide
comments or suggestions regarding how a trading/offsets approach would best be
implemented in Maryland.
. The commentor states that Anne Arundel (AA) County is currently negotiating a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for a "nutrient bubble" permit to include all of our
Document version: December 14.2006
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
WWI'Ps that discharge to the Bay. Ifa TMDI. for total nitrogen ('IN) and total phosphorus
(TP) is set, how does MDE anticipate AA County to include a facility strapped with a
TMDI.? The MOt; allows for Ioadings flexibility between plants. It appears that a plant with
TMDI. concentration limits s~ill not have much flexibility. The TMDL plant will not have
the flexibility to "'trade" Ioadings with other facilities as specified in the draft MOU.
Response: In general, the purpose of the MOU is to provide flexibility in meeting the Bay
loading cap requirements. The TMDI. for the Baltimore Ilarbor does not contradict the
approach being negotiated in the MOIL MDE has been clear that an', more stringent local
TMI)L requirements may apply in addition to any requirements for meeting water qualit)
standards.
. The commcntor states that their current permit specifies a monitoring schedule of 2 times per
month for TN. If daily means daily, should AA Count), anticipate an increase of monitoring
to daily? If so, this will be adding additional cost and burden on the Count5' for vet)' little
benefit.
Response: MIDE does not anticipate that daily monitoring will be required.
10. The commentor expresses difficult3,' understanding why a nutrient TMDI. within the Inner
Ilarbor is being established at this point in time (i.e., pre-ENR upgrades) while at the same
time MDE's permitting division is working on issuing "bubble permits" to allow "internal
trading." The commentor's understanding was that a TMDL would be issued only as a last
resort. The commentor's feeling is that ifa nutrient TMDL is set at this point in time. MDE
is not giving ENR enhancements a chance and will be limiting growth and flexibilib' in the
area.
Response: As explained in the response to comment g8, MDE has alwa~rs been clear that
any more stringent local TMDL requirements may apply in addition to any requirements for
meeting Chesapeake Bay water quality standards. The TMDI. requirements for the Baltimore
Harbor still allows for issuance of a "bubble" (or watershed) permit that addresses
Chesapeake Bay nutrient caps.
II. The commentor states that a portion of the urban nutrient load is due to sanitary sewer
leakage. Reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus through repair of the sanitaD' sewer system
v, as estimated to be - 10% of the urban load by the Gwynns Falls Water Quality
Management Plan. The commentor continues that the Plan is available through MDE's
Water Management Administration (WMA)- Stormwater Program.
Response: The TMI)L Program has been working closely with WMA's Stormwater
Program and is aware that broken sanitat3, pipes laid in the streambed are a major source of
nutrients, due to wastewater exfiltrating into the stream. One of the most significant planned
implementation measures requires the jurisdictions within the watershed to evaluate their
sanitary sewer systems and to repair, replace, or rehabilitate the system as indicated by the
results of those evaluations (i.e. the separation of combined sewer systems in Baltimore City
and the elimination of sanitary sewer overflows in Baltimore CiD and Baltimore County).
Document version: December 14, 2006
4
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
12. The commentor, referencing Section 5.0 Assurance of Implementation, states that the WRAS
being developed in Itoward County is mentioned, but the watershed planning efforts of
Baltimore County and Baltimore City are not acknowledged. Baltimore County has
Watershed Management Plans tbr the County portion of Jones Falls and the Patapsco River
watersheds. Baltimore County has a Watershed Management Plan for Gwynns Falls
developed jointly with Baltimore City. These plans identify and prioritize Capital Program
restoration projects for improvement of water quality.
Response: MDE acknowledges the planning efforts made by the County and the City and
will incorporate information regarding those efforts in the TMDL Assurance of
Implementation Section.
13. The commentor, referencing the Assurance of Implementation section, states that the section
does not acknowledge the fact that local jurisdictions have already implemented many
restoration projects that ha',e resulted in the reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus and have
additional projects in the design phase. Within the three watersheds (Patapsco River,
Gwynns Falls, and Jones Falls) Baltimore County has already expended or budgeted in
excess of $12 million. These efforts are detailed in the annual Baltimore County NPDES Municipal Stormwater Discharge Permit reporl, available through MI)E's Water
Management Administration - Stormwater Program.
Response: MDE acknowledges the investment made by Baltimore County, and as such
additional information will be incorporated into the Assurance of Implementation Section.
14. The commentor states that both Baltimore County and Baltimore City are under Consent
Decrees to repair their respective sanitary sev,'er systems. The commentor continues that the
nutrient reduction that can be achieved through these repairs should be acknowledged under
the Assurances of Implementation.
Response: Language referring to the above-mentioned consent decrees will be added in the
Assurance of Implementation Section. Please also see the response to comment #12.
15. The commentor states that Anne Arundel Count), has developed a Countywide landcover and
impervious cover dataset. It was developed using I-meter true color (RGB) and color
infrared (NIR) 1l-bit orthorectified IKONOS imagery captured in May of 2004. Plans are
underway to update this dataset with intbrmation from 2006. The commentor requests that
MDE please contact the commentor, should MDE be interested in this data for this draft
TMDL or for other purposes.
Response: MDE appreciates Anne Arundel County's invitation and will contact the County
staff lbr tiJture TMDL projects involving land cover data in the county.
16. The commentor states that Anne Arundel (AA) County has developed and is using a
Watershed Management Tool (WMI') to assist in the County's NPDES Municipal Separate
Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit requirements as well as TMDI,s. The commentor
Document version: December 14, 2006
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
continues that this tool consists of several water quality, hydrology, and hydraulic models. It
is the commentor's belicfthat these models can be used to assist in the development of
TMDI. Implementation Plans. The commentor maintains that using the WMT, a variety of
various management alternatives can be evaluated to determine ifa numeric goal can be met
through the implementation of the ahcmatives. The commentor v, ould like to request a
meeting with key staffat MDE to review the WMT and how the Count) proposes to use it to
assist us in meeting our TMDI.s.
Response: MDE appreciates Anne Arundel County invitation and will contact the County
staff for future TMDI. implementation projects in the county.
17. The commentor states that WMT is currently being used to prioritize all of the subwatersheds
in the County as to each suhwatershed's need for watershed restoration. This tool, similar to
the Howard County WRAS (mentioned on page 36 of the draft report), will bo able to assist
in "identifying and prioritizing watershed restoration ef|brts, which will include the reduction
of nutrient loads from the watershed."
Response: Please see response to comment 16.
18. The commentor states that it appears the Future Conditions (TMDL) Scenario indicates that
the designated uses (except deep channel) can bc met using the strategy set forth in requiring
reductions from wastewater treatment plants, industrial point sources, and 15% reduction in
both agricultural and urban loads. As the commentor understands it, the scenario does not
account for possible reductions due to septic system upgrades or septic connections, or in
reductions from recreational vehicles. The commentor asks whether the County can receive
credit toward the Baltimore Harbor Nutrient TMDL for reductions in loads due to the
implementation of these practices.
Response: In principle, the County can receive credit toward achieving the Baltimore
ttarbor Nutrient TMDL NPS reductions from any practices that are scientificallv justified. It
should be noted that credit being sought to offset increases in point source discharges be',ond
existing allocations would need to be justified through a formal permitting process. MDE is
in the process of developing an offset and trading policx.
19. The commentor stated that nutrient load reductions from wildlife and pet v, aste management
practices are not mentioned in the subject draft TMDL. Because AA County has several
bacteria TMDLs, and the TMDLs indicate the bacteria loads are primarily due to pets and
wildlife, the commentor asks would practices that address the bacteria TMDLs also be able
to Ix: used to address the nutrient TMDLs? Implementing particular practices, such as a
reduction in pet waste, would be beneficial in reducing bacteria as well as in reducing
nutrients. It would seem that practices that address several different types of TMDLs would
make the most of the limited resources local juri~ictions have to address TMDLs.
Response: Though not directly linked, it is assumed that the bacteria management plans,
such as pet waste management and ~nitary sewer infrastructure restoration, ,,','ill have a
significant impact in nutrients loads reductions. In reference to wildlife management,
Document version: December 14, 2006
6
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
although tt is not mentioned in the Baltimore Harbor Nutrients TMDLs, the bacteria TMDLs
state the following:
"It is expected that in some waters for which TMDLs will be developed, the bacteria source
analysis indicates that after controls are in place for all anthropogenic sources, the waterbody
will not meet water quality standards. However, while neither Maryland, nor EPA is
proposing the elimination of wildlife to allow for the attainment of water quality standards,
managing the overpopulation of wildlife remains an option for state and local stakeholders.
After developing and implementing to the maximum extent possible a reduction goal based
on the anthropogenic sources identified in the TMDL, Maryland anticipates that
implementation to reduce the controllable nonpoint sources may also reduce some wildlife
inputs to the waters."
20. The commentor states that a significant amount of the Baltimore Harbor subwatershed area
[Other nonpoint source (NPS) Loads], approximately 29%, is not slated for nutrient
reductions. The commentor asks are local jurisdictions permitted to receive credit for
reductions in loads due to best management practices (BMPs) that might be applied to these
areas?
Response: Part of these "Other NPS Loads" are nutrient loads from non-controllable
sources such as forested land. l.ocal jurisdictions will be acknowledged and credited lbr
reductions in loads due to best management practices (BMPs) that might be applied to these
or any other areas. See also response to comment 18.
21. The commentor asks how will the various counties that drain to the Baltimore l larbor know
if they have met their part of the load reductions necessary for the TMDL?
Response: This question will be addressed as part of an iterative implementation planning
process. The Department envisions will involve periodic assessment of progress toward
reaching TMDL goals and the effectiveness of particular programs and practices. To this
end, the State is urging local governments to participate in the Tributary Strategy
Implementation Plan development process for Maryland's ten major basins that drain to
Che~peake Bay. This initiative, although presently focused on meeting nutrients goals in
the Bay, is likely to be integral to the implementation planning process for tributary nutrient
TMDLs.
22. The commentor states AA County, consisting of 46,223 acres within the 268,671 Baltimore
I larbor Subwatershed I, or 17.2%, has a potential urban stormwater point source allocation of
18% 2 of the nutrients nitrogen and phosphorus. The commentor asks why is there a
diffi:rence in the amount of the load allocation as compared to the land acres within the
subwatershed?
: From l'able I (page 4 ) of Draft TMDI. report
2 Calculated li'om May 15, 2006 Technical Memorandum entitled Stgm/icant A'utrient Point Sources in the
Balttmore Harbor Watershed Tables I b and 2b
Document version: December 14, 2006
7
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
Response: The urban stormwater point source allocation of 18% was estimated based on the
percentage of URBAN area in the county relative to the TOTAl. URBAN AREA in the
watershed, not to the TOTAl. AREA.
23. The commentor, referencing Table I of the Draft "I'MDL report and the appendix entitled
Baltimore Harbor Nutrients TMDLs Appendix (': Potenttal TMDL Allocattons by Source
Category, states that Table I indicates AA County has 46.223 acres v, ithin the Baltimore
Harbor Subwatershed, or 17% of the land area while the appendix indicates on page C2 that
AA County has 18% of the land in the watershed. The commentor asks why is there a
discrepancy in the amount of land in the watershed? The commentors continue that the other
jurisdictions shown in Table I also have differing percentages of land area thanthat stated on
C2 as follov, s:
Jurisdiction
Area (% from Table I)
AA
Baltimore Cit),
Baltimore
Carroll
Howard
Total
17.2
15.1
37.4
15.0
15.3
100
Area (% from C2)
18
25
41
7
9
100
Response: The percentages in Table 1 are based on total areas. The percentages in Table C2
are based on URBAN areas only. Please also see the response to Comment 22.
24. The commentor states that the loads from point sources and urban/stormwater sources are
distributed to local jurisdictions in Appendix C of the Draft report but the nonpoint source
loads are not distributed. The commentor asks how arc the nonpoint source loads to be
distributed to the local jurisdictions? The commentor also asks how does MDE plan to
determine if each of the local jurisdictions is meeting their part of the nonpoint source load
reduction?
Response: Nonpoint sources loads (agricultural and forest loads) by jurisdiction have been
added to the NPS Technical Memorandum. For the second comment, please refer to the
response to Comment 21.
25. The commentor asks how is future growth taken into account in the allocations?
Response: The TMDL analysis has been revised to include a future allocation for nitrogen.
In addition to this explicit future allocation for nitrogen, future growth is implicitly accounted
lot in the l larbor TMDI... When developing a "I'MDL, MDE accounts for pollutant inputs
from all sources, including discharges from industrial plants and sewage treatment facilities.
from urban areas, and natural sources as stated in the report. One way to account for future
growth in the TMDL is by using the maximum flow design capacity of the wastewater
treatment facilities. Also, any future growth in the watershed is likely to occur in the
remaining land that can still be developed within the v, atershed and this land is limited. It is
expected that any future growth is likely to happen by converting some of the remaining
Document version: December 14, 2006
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
FINAL
agricultural, which in some areas such as Baltimore City accounts only for only a minimum
percentage of the total land, into commercial and residential land uses. It is not expected that
lbrest land would be developed. In addition, the TMDLs per se - as required under the Clean
Water Act - are irrespective of changes in land use or Ioadings. A TMDI. is the assimilative
capacity of the waterbody. Please also see the response to Comment 31.
26. The commentors state they are shocked and surprised to find that the total annual nitrogen
load allocations in the proposed TMDL are approximately 50% higher than what was
presented at the last meeting of the MDE's Baltimore Harbor TMDL Stakeholder Advisory
Group (SAG) in December 2003. The commentors continue that this disconnect represents a
total disregard for the efforts of the many stakeholders that participated in the SAG, not to
mention a complete lack of transparency in the decision making process. The commentors
state that no explanation is given in the proposed TMDL for the large changes berween the
December 2003 SAG TMDL (SAG TMDL) and the proposed TMDI. made available tbr
public review (proposed TMDI.).
Response: At the
December 2003 SAG meeting, in the interest of maximizing informed
discussion, MDE presented some initial analysis and figures, not a proposal. Numbers
projected betbre the completion of the analysis changed as the analysis was completed. A
TMDL is an objective process based on complex models and monitoring data and changes
can occur throughout the last part of the development period.
27. The commcntors note that the majority of the increase from the SAG TMDL to the proposed
TMDI. can be attributed to differences in the total nitrogen for industrial point sources in
Baltimore ltarbor. The commentors continue that the SAG TMDL allocated an annual load
of approximately I.I million pounds of nitrogen while in the proposed TM DL, the industrial
point source allocation is nearly double that, approximately 2.1 million pounds of nitrogen
annually. The commentor ends by stating that the remainder of the overall 1.7 million pound
increase is due to higher allocations to nonpoint sources, bolh agricultural and urban
stormwater.
Response: Please also see the
response to Comment 26. In addition, the following are bases
for differences from the preliminary informal estimates:
• The calibration of the model was not final at the time initial projections were
discussed with the SAG; it was preliminary data and analysis.
• Estimates of TMDL loads were based on the average of the last 3 ofthe 6 )'ears the
model scenario was run, as opposed to the December 2003 preliminary estimate that
was based on all 6 years of the model run. The last 3 years were used because
significant WQ improvement occurs in the first 3 years of the model run and it is
more accurate to calculate the TMDL without including these first years of the model
run.
•
Industrial loads were revised after the December 2003 presentation, and part of the
increase is due to 0.462 million pounds of nitrogen (0.007 million pounds of
phosphorus) estimated for the Cox Creek Dredge Material Containment Facility that
~as not included in the original projections.
Document version: December 14, 2006
q
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
The new water quality standards were not promulgated when the presentation ",'.'as
made.
The majority of the remainder difference is due to the revision of Industrial Facilities
allocations. The December 2003 estimates were based on Chesapeake Bay Program
(CBP) Tier III allocations that made untenable assumptions by applying municipal
wastewater facilities reduction capabilities to industrial processes. The current
estimate uses the ,same assumptions as Tributary Strategies.
28. The commentors state that the proposed TMDL is also inconsistent `.`.'ith the State's
commitment to Chesapeake Bay Restoration by allowing the discharge of approximately 1.7
million pounds more nitrogen into Baltimore Harbor than is called for in the State's
Patapsco/Back River Tributat) Strategy. The commentors state that the proposed TMDL is
also inconsistent with nitrogen load allocations necessary to protect water quality in the
(Chesapeake) Bay. The commentors reference the February 2006 drat~ of Maryland's
Chesapeake Bay Tributary Strategy State Implementation Plan stating that in the Plan, the
load cap for the Patapsco/Back River Tributary is listed as 5.93 million pounds of nitrogen
per year. The commentors compare this number with allocations in the proposed TMDL
added to the number in the Back River TMI)I,, stating this results in 7.1 million pounds
annually. The commentors continue that they recognize that a TMDL that is protective of
local water quality will not necessarily protect bay water quality - hence a more stringent
load may be required. The commentors recommend that MDE should capitalize on this
opportunity to further the State's commitments to Bay restoration by harmonizing the
different load allocations, particularly with respect to reducing pollution loads from point
sources.
Response: The Department's analysis indicates that `.`..ater quality will be met in Baltimore
I tarbor (with the exception of the Deep Channel because of the channel hydrology
modifications, not due to nutrient Ioadings). The Department agrees with the commentor's
premise that downstream water quality standards must be protected and that dischargers
should be required to meet the most stringent of any applicable requirements. However
because point sources are specifically regulated under discharge permits issued by the State,
the appropriate vehicle to achieve the requested "harmonization" will be through effluent
limitations applied in the individual discharge permits which must be protective of all local
and downstream water quality standards and TMDLs. In addition, the issue of whether the
maximum amount of pollution reduction should be required as part of the local TMI)I,
because of downstream concerns (Ba) water quality) ',',ill need to be addressed by the Bay
Water Quality Model and the Bay TMDL. If. as a result oftbe Bay TMDI,, additional
reductions will be required, the more stringent of the tv, o (local and the Bay) allocations ',`.'ill
appl,',.
29. The commentors are very concerned that the method used to assess attainment of the
dissolved oxygen (DO) criteria in the Open Water Designated Use area is flawed. The
commentors reference page B4, "the analysis indicates that the attainment curve rises above
the reference curve slightly, the time and volume represented by this area is <1% in time an
volume. This results in the designated use meeting its criteria with 0% attainment." The
commentors are adamantly opposed to the implementation of criteria in this tashion. The
Document version: December 14, 2006
I0
~OO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
commentors continue that the reli:rence curve allows for some exceedances of the water
quality criteria. The purpose of the reference curve is to represent the spatial and temporal
distribution of DO concentrations in areas supporting healthy communities. The commentors
maintain that exceedances beyond those "allowed" by the reference curve, however, mean
that the criterion is not being attained. The commentors state that the load allocations for
nitrogen and phosphorus should have been reduced in the TMDL until the entire attainment
curve fell below the reference curve.
Response: As explained in the TMDL report, the DO criteria attainment assessment for
Baltimore I larbor was performed using the Chesapeake Bay Program Reference Curve
program. The output of this program provides percent attainment and percent non-attainment
with these percentages results rounded to two decimal places. For the Open Water
designated use (from October I to January 31) the output of the program sho',,,s the following
for attainment of DO criteria in the above mentioned designated use: 0.93 attainment, 0.07
allowable exceedance, and 0.00 non-attainment (equivalent to 93% attainment, 7% allowable
exceedance, and 0% non-attainment.
Based on these results, the percent non-attainment for this designated use is 0%. If the
results of the Reference Curve Program were to be output with numbers rounded to three
decimal points, MDE estimates that this percent of'non-attainment should be somewhere
between 0.000 and 0.005 (0.0% and 0.5%). Thus, the statement provided in the Appendix B
of the Draft. TMDL document will be modilied to read as lbllows:
"A visual analysis of the reference curve plot indicates that the attainment curve rises
slightly above the reference curve. The numerical values obtained from the output of
the attainment program shows a 0.00 or 0% non-attainment. Therefore, it is estimated
that the DO exceedance in time and volume time represented by this area should be
between 0.000 and 0.005 (between 0.0% and 0.5%) in time and volume, otherwise if
higher than 0.005, the numerical value of the program output would approximate to the
next decimal showing a 0.01 or I% exceedance. Based on the review of the reference
curve program model output, MDE concludes that this specific designated use meets its
DO criteria."
30. The Commentors request MDE to re-convene the SAG, which the Commentor states "'for
unknown reasons, the stakeholder process came to a grinding halt after December 2003".
The commcntors recommend that MDE rescind the proposed 1MDL to develop a TMDL
that includes input li'om stakeholders as MDE initially envisioned. The Commentors also
note that their comments are supported by Eliza Steinmeier, the Baltimore Harbor
Waterkeeper.
Response: MDE did not stop holding the SAG meetings in 2003. MDE continued meeting
on toxics issues, until the group came to an impasse resulting from Chesapeake Bay
Foundation's (CBF) insistence that the Department address ingestion of toxic sediment by
microscopic invertebrates; the Department is still working with the University to address this
issue. MI)E sees no technical basis for rescinding the TMDL and believes the usual public
participation provided the Department with adequate input from the community.
Document version: December 14. 2006
II
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
31. The commentor requests that the seasonal Ma) I through October 31 nutrient loading goal
for the CoxCreek WRF (Permit No. MD0021661) be increased from 68,484 Ibs/growing
season (3mg/L at 15 mgd) to 91,300 Ibs/growing season (4 mg/l. at 15 mgd). There are Ibur
(4) reasons for this request:
Anne Arundel County is currently in the process of finalizing an Enhanced Nutrient
Reduction (ENR) Agreement with MDE which covers all seven of the Count)'s publicly
owned wastewater treatment facilities including the Cox Creek WRF. Negotiations for
this agreement have been ongoing for more than a year with the understanding that the
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) limits for the Cox Creek
WRF would be based on the equivalent of 4.0 mg/l. at the rated plant capacity of 15.0
mgd on an annual average basis. Lower seasonal permit limits `",'ere not part of this
negotiation process. The County hopes to have this document signed within the next
month and for the ENR design for the Cox Creek WRF to proceed immediately thereafter
and feels that it would be in bad faith for MDE to change the discharge limits for the Cox
Creek WRF before the ENR Agreement has even been executed. All of our assumptions
in these negotiations have been based on direction received from MDE that the loading
goal for the Cox Creek WRF will be based on an average concentration of 4.0 mg/L at
the design capacity (15 mgd).
The Cox Creek WRF has traditionally received a very high strength intluent wastewater
(compared to the County's other six municipal wastewater treatment plants) and often
sees very high peak flow events during wet weather periods. The facility has always had
difficulty achieving full nitrification during cold weather periods (even at~er the BNR
Upgrade). The facility is located on a relatively small parcel of land with no room for
further expansion. The County is already prepared to commit to MDE to upgrade this
facility to achieve ENR limits of 4.0 rag/l. 'IN on an annual average basis. Ilowever, it is
not clear that this thcility can be economically upgraded to achieve the proposed 3.0
mg/L TN limit which would be required by the proposed Baltimore Harbor TMDI. limit
of 68,484 Ibs/gro','ing season. This is not to .say achieving the proposed TMDL is
technically impossible, but that it `'`'ill be very costly to guarantee achievement of this
level of treatment at the design capacity of the facility. Given limited funding resources.
it seems that it `'~,ould be in the best interest ofall parties involved to set the seasonal and
annual TMDL limits for the Cox Creek WRF at a more reasonably achievable 4.0 mg/L
TN. Setting the limits at this point will provide some llexibility for Operations and
therefore reduce the amount of added redundancy, which would otherwise be required for
the design.
Anne Arundel Count) is currently in the process of completing a new Comprehensive
Sewer Strategic Plan, which will be finished later this year. The prqiect build-out flow
estimate for the Cox Creek WRF sewer service area (SSA) is 22.67 mgd. Expansion of
the Cox Creek WRF ',,,ill be necessary in the future to se~,e growth within the existing
designated SSA unless wastewater flow can be diverted to another facility, such as the
Patapsco WWTP in Baltimore Cit'. Based on information received from MDI-, the
County has assumed that the Cox Creek WRF could be expanded within the proposed
Document version: December 14. 2006
12
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl.
ENR nitrogen loading limits by achieving less than 4.0 mg/L TN on an annual average
basis (182,734 Ibs/yr annually). For example, if the Count)' could achieve 3.0 mg/L TN
at the Cox Creek WRF on an annual average basis, the facility could be expanded to 20.0
mgd and still be within the 182,734 Ibs/yr TN ENR loading cap assigned by MDE.
However, ifa 68,484 Ibs/gro~ving season TN limit is imposed by MDE under the
Baltimore Harbor TMDI., this ~ould prevent expansion of the Cox Creek WRF beyond
its current capacity ot"15.0 mgd because v,e do not believe that operation of the Cox
Creek WRF to achieve significantly less than 3.0 mg/L TN is reliably possible on a
seasonal basis. ]'he additional anticipated flow from the existing SSA would all need to
be redirected to other facilities - - most likely the Broadneck WRF or the Patapsco
WWTP in Baltimore City. Itowever, the Broadneck WRF is also limited by its ability to
expand to serve the project 13.86 mgd from its own existing SSA and Anne Arundel
County does not have an Agreement with Baltimore City to expand sewer flow allocation
beyond the currently established quantities. Therelore, if the Waste Load Allocation
assigned to the Cox Creek WRF is set at 68,484 lbs/growing season as proposed in the
draft TMDL, it will limit the County's ability to serve the future residents and businesses
in the currently designated Cox Creek SSA.
The Waste Load Allocations for the Baltimore Harbor TMDI. appear to impose an undue
burden on municipalities (Anne Arundel Count)' and Baltimore City) to achieve
extremely low effluent nutrient concentrations than are required for industrial point
sources. The two municipal systems, both of which treat flow from industries in the
region and suffer from nitrification inhibition, high strength wastewaters, and high peak
flows, are being asked to achieve 3.0 mg/L TN during the growing season while the
industrial sources which have a much more consistent and controlled wastewater flow.
are being assigned higher, more relaxed "IN discharge goals. For example, the ISG
Group has five NPDES permits included in the proposed TMDI. Waste Loading
Allocation, combined which are several times larger than the flow rate from the Cox
Creek WRF, and are only being asked to achieve a 4.0 mg/L TN concentration. Other
industries are being allowed to discharge at 25 mg/L "IN (WR Grace), 8.13 mg/L TN
(Millenium) or higher. Setting concentration limits for industries, especially those with
such large loading contributions, higher than the concentration limits for municipalities
treating a more difficult and unpredictable waste stream is simply not lair.
Response: MDE has reviewed the contributions of industrial discharges and found that ISG
Steel warrants application of reduction goals. ISG Steel has met or exceeded nutrient loading
reduction goals based on the initial baseline of 1985 as reti:renced in various preceding
reports regarding Maryland's nutrient reduction goals and results. This was a facility-wide
result based on the total discharge loads from all sources at the facility. However, upon
further reviews, the Department believes the Ioadings from ISG outfalls should be reduced on
an outfall specific basis, in this case outfall MPI01, due to the relativel) large Ioadings from
this outfall location, and that the only option appears to be additional end of pipe treatment
(the outfall already includes Best Available Technology and ammonia nitrogen removal
technology.) The reduced allocation will be based on a percentage reduction proportional to
what was considered practical for sewage treatment plants to achieve going from secondary
treatment capability to Biological Nutrient Removal (BNR). Because this outfall involves
Document version: December 14, 2006
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
industrial process effluent and likely does not have the .same treatability level as the nutrients
found in routine secondary effluent from sev.age treatment plants. ENR equivalent levels are
not yet considered practical at this time. The revised BNR equivalent reduction level in the
revised TMDI. ',','ill be accompanied by a future allocation reserve pending the result of the
individual discharge permit process during v, hich specific nutrient reduction feasibilities v, ill
be determined.
Based on the above changes in ISG's reductions goals, a portion of the current allowable
nitrogen load can be set aside as a future allocation to account for growth in the region. The
surface water discharge permitting in this region will be consistent with the TMDI,, however
the nitrogen future allocation load can be used to adjust the relative nitrogen allocation of
point sources from the different facilities to address the issue that a seasonal nitrogen limit
based on 3 mg/I ma3,. not be practical /br ENR technology at some facilities.
Please also see the response to Comment 5.
Document version: December 14, 2006
14
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAL
Appendix A
Additional Comments Received After the Public Comment Period
The Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) replied to MDE's original response to CBF's public
comment period comments. Below are the comments in the second letter received by MDE
regarding the Baltimore Harbor TMDI.s for Nitrogen and Phosphorus.
I. The commentor expresses that the response letter did litlle to address the concerns raised:
the "allowable" nitrogen load to Baltimore Ilarbor would be almost 50% higher than
previously suggested, as well as their request that MDE rescind the proposed TMDL and
re-convene the Baltimore Harbor Stakeholder Advisors' Group (SAG) to develop a
TMDL that includes input from stakeholders as MDE initially envisioned. The
commentors re-iterate this request and have also asked the Environmental Protection
Agency to withhold approval of the TMDL until these issues have been resolved.
Response: As explained above (see response to Comment 26), at the December 2003
MDE presented some initial analysis and figures, not a proposal. Numbers projected
before the completbn of the analysis changed as the analysis was completed. A TMI)L
is an objective process based on complex models and monitoring data and changes can
occur throughout the last part of the development period. MDE sees no technical basis
for rescinding the TMDL and believes the established TMDI, usual public participation
process, supplemented by the prior 2002-2003 SAG process have afforded the
Department ample input from the community.
. The total nitrogen load allocation in the proposed TMDI. is approximatebs' 50% higher
than what was presented at the last full meeting of the Baltimore Harbor TMDL SAG in
December, 2003. CBF believes a change of this magnitude merits a detailed explanation,
particularly to the numerous stakeholders that regularly participated on the Baltimore
Harbor SAG until its abrupt halt nearly three years ago. The commentor fails to see hov,
the first three of the following given reasons for the differences between the December
2003 load reduction estimates and those in the draft 2006 TMDL: I) the 2003 simulation
attempted to meet water quality standards everywhere, including the Deep Channel,
whereas the 2006 allocations do not; 2) model calibration was not complete in 2003; 3)
reduction estimates in 2006 were based n three years of scenario input, rather than six
years used in 2003; and revisions to industrial load allocations. The commentor
continues that the presentation given at the December 2003 meeting, it was stated that the
Deep Channel and Deep Water would not meet water quality criteria for dissolved
oxygen. The commentor adds that the changes to the model or calibration could change
the load allocation, but they don't see how that would account for the magnitude of the
change observed - an increase in allowable annual loads of nitrogen of approximately 1.7
million pounds.
Response: As explained above, numbers projected before the completion of the analysis
changed as the analysis was completed. For more details see the response to Comment
27.
Document version: I~cember 14, 2006
15
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
FINAl,
. The commentor states that the main reason for the difference between 2003 and 2006
appears to be the allocation of approximately one million pounds of nitrogen per )'ear to
tv, o industrial sources - the Cox Creek Dredged Material Containment Facility
(CCDMCF) and the International Steel Group (ISG). The commentor states that it is
particularly troubling that the permit for CCDMCF was issued in 2004 allowing the
discharge of more than 400.000 pounds of total nitrogen per year into a system that is
already listed on the State's 303(d) report as impaired for nutrients. The commentor
continues that the addition of approximately 600,000 pounds to ISG, without explanation,
from the initial 2003 allocation is also problematic and is inconsistent v, ith load
reductions the State committed to achieve in the Patapsco/Back River Tributary Strategy.
Response: MDE reiterates that the numbers presented at the 2003 meeting were from
just one ofan extensive list of loading scenarios tried v~hile in the long process of
developing the Ilarbor "I'MDL. The TMDL scenario presented in December 2003 ',',as
conducted early during the TMDL development process, and at that time, MDE was very
aggressive in reducing nutrient loads from both point sources and nonpoint sources in an
effort to attain DO criteria in the Deep Channel designated use. In a later scenario
conducted for the purpose of sensitivity analysis, it was demonstrated that even after
reducing by 100% nonpoint sources and point sources, the Deep Channel would not meet
criteria. In other words, eliminating all nutrient loads from the system would still not
bring the Deep Channel into compliance. Therefore. the goal of the TMDL is to achieve
water quality criteria in all other designated uses of the Baltimore Harbor. These
scenarios and their rationale are explained in the TMDL report.
One important issue to point out is that even after adding the 462,000 Ibs/year of nitrogen
allocated to CCDMCF, the reductions to point sources TN from the 1995-1997 baseline
is close to 50% with an additional I I% from nonpoint sources (from baseline urban,
agricultural, and other NPS loads to I.A (not including MOS and FA). Similarly, the
reductions to point sources TP is approximately 28% with an additional 13% from
nonpoint sources. Overall, the reduction from "I'N baseline loads is approximately 37%
(including MOS and FA) and the overall reduction from TP baseline loads is close to
10%.
Finally, the allocation to ISG was reduced by an additional 66.410 pounds of TN and
45,690 pounds of TP after a final revision was made to the point sources loads. The
TMDL as developed provides for the attainment of all designated uses in the Baltimore
Harbor except for that of the Deep Channel.
Document version: December 14, 2006
16
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION III
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029
12/17/2007
Dr. Richard Eskin, Director
Technical and Regulatory Services Administration
Maryland Department of the Environment
1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 540
Baltimore, MD 21230
Dear Dr. Eskin:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is pleased to approve the Total
Maximum Daily l,oads (TMDLs) for total nitrogen and total phosphorus for the Baltimore
l larbor, v, ith the exception of the Deep Channel as discussed below, that address the Migratory
Fish and Spawning and Open Water (including the restoration variance) designated uses. The
TMDL Report was submitted by the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) on
December 14, 2006, to EPA for review and approval. This TMDL was established and
submitted in accordance with Sections 303(d)(1)(c) and (2) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to
address impairments of water quality as identified in Maryland's Section 303(d) Lists. The
Baltimore Harbor (basin number 02130903) was identified on Maryland's Section 303(d) Lists
as impaired by nutrients (1996 listing), bacteria (1998 listing), PCBs (1998 listing), metals (1998
listing), suspended sediments ( 1996 listing) and impacts to biological communities (2004). This
approval letter addresses the nutrient listing only.
In accordance with Federal regulations at 40 CFR §130.7, a TMDL must comply with the
following requirements: ( I ) be designed to attain and maintain the applicable water quality
standards; (2) include a total allowable loading and as appropriate, wasteload allocations for
point sources and load allocations for nonpoint sources; (3) consider the impacts of background
pollutant contributions; (4) take critical stream conditions into account (the conditions when
water quality is most likely to be violated); (5) consider seasonal variations; (6) include a margin
of safety (which accounts for uncertainties in the relationship between pollutant loads and instream water quality); and (7) be subject to public participation. ]'he nutrient TMDLs for the
Baltimore l larbor satist~' each of these requirements for areas of the Harbor with the exception of
the Deep Channel. In addition, these TMDLs considered reasonable assurance that the TMDL
allocations assigned to nonpoint sources can be reasonably met. A copy of EPA's decision
rationale [br approval of these TMDLs is included with this letter.
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer flber and process chlorine free.
Customer Service Hotline: I-1~00-438-2474
~OO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
2
The analysis provided by the state shows that even after the removal of the anthropogenic
sources to their maximum level, the water quality criteria for dissolved oxygen cannot be met in
the Deep Channel. Therefore, EPA is not including that portion of the Baltimore Ilarbor in this
approval. EPA recommends that the Deep Channel remain on the State's CWA Section 303(d)
list of impaired ~aters and evaluate the ~ater quality needs of this portion of the Harbor.
possibly through a Use Attainability Analysis. Following the re-evaluation, an additional q'MDL
to address the needs of the Deep Channel may be required.
As ',ou know', all new or revised National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
permits must be consistent with the TMDI, wasteload allocation pursuant to 40 CFR
§122.44(d)(I)(vii)(B). Please submit all such permits to EPA for review as per EPA's letter
datcd October 1, 1998.
If you have any questions concerning these TMDLs, please contact Mr. Kuo-I_,iang I,ai.
Maryland TMDL Coordinator. at (215) 814-5473 or Mr. Thomas Henry, TMDL Program
Manager, at (215) 814-5752.
Sincerely,
Signed
Jon M. Capacasa, Director
Water Protection Division
Enclosure
cc: Melissa Chatham, MDE-TARSA
Nauth Panda), MDE-TARSA
%~
Printed on 100% reo'cled/recyclable paper with I O0%post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION III
1650 Arch Street
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029
Decision Rationale
Total Maximum Daily Load for Nitrogen
and Phosphorus in the Baltimore Harbor Watershed
Anne Arundel, Carroll and Howard Counties
Baltimore City, MD
Signed
Jon M. Capacasa, Director
Water Protection Division
Date: 12/17/2007
~
Printed on I00 0~ re~,cled/rec) *clable paper with I00 0~ post-consumer flber and process chlorine free.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
~OO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Decision Rationale
Total Maximum Daily Loads for Baltimore Harbor Watershed
For Nitrogen and Phosphorus, Anne Arundel, Carroll and
Howard Counties, Baltimore City, Maryland
I.
EPA Decision
EPA is approving the nitrogen and phosphorus TMI)I,s for the Baltimore Harbor with the
exception of the Deep Channel. Modeled scenarios included one in which anthropogenic sources
were removed at their maximum level. This model run showed that, even under these extreme
conditions, DO criteria could not be met in the Deep Channel while all other areas of the
ltarbor - the Migratoo' Fish and Spassning and Open Water designated use areas - would attain
the DO criteria. The Chlorophyl 'a' narrative criteria is met in all areas. Because the TMDI,s do
not attain the ~ater quality criteria for the Deep Channel. EPA is not including the Deep Channel
in this approval. Maryland should place the Deep Channel on the section 303(d) list of impaired
waters during the next listing cycle for excessive nutrients. Maryland should consider additional
stud)' for the Deep Channel, possibly including a use attainability analysis, and re-evaluate the
loading requirements for the Deep Channel in order to assure the dissolved oxygen water quality
criteria are attained. Allocation model runs show that the DO criteria and chlorophyll 'a'
narrative criteria are met in all areas of the llarbor except for the Deep Channel as noted above.
The results of this allocation run, i.e. the proposed allocations to the point and nonpoint sources
as discussed below, represent the TMDLs that EPA is approving with this action. EPA believes
the TMDLs as proposed by MDE and the implementation of the included allocations x~ill result
in considerable improvement in the Baltimore l larbor. However, further work is needed in the
Deep Channel. This approval assumes the allowance of the continuation of water quality
standards restoration variance for the Deep Water of the Ilarbor, i.e. a 7% variance of the DO
criteria.
I1.
Introduction
The Clean Water Act (CWA) requires that Total Maximum Daily Loads ('FMDI,s) bc
developed for those waterbodies that will not attain water quality standards after application of
technology-based and other required controls. A "lMl)l, sets the quantit? of a pollutant that ma)
be introduced into a waterbody without causing an exceedance of the applicable water quality
standard. EPA's regulations define a TMDI, as the sum of the wasteload allocations (WLAs)
assigned to point sources, the load allocations (I,As) assigned to nonpoint sources and natural
background, and a margin of safety (MOS).
A TMDI, is a written plan and analysis established to ensure that a waterbody ',,.,ill attain
and maintain ~sater quality standards. A TMDL is a scientifically-based strategy which
considers current and foreseeable conditions, the best available data, and accounts for uncertainty
with the inclusion of a margin of satety. TMDI,s may be revised in order to address new water
quality data, better understanding of natural processes, refined modeling assumptions or anal) sis
and/or real location.
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
This document sets forth the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) rationale
for approving the TMDLs for nitrogen and phosphorus in the Baltimore Harbor (stream code
02130903) in Maryland. These TMDLs were established to address impairment of water quality
as identified in Maryland's 1996 Section 303(d) l,ist of impaired waters. The Maryland
Department of the Environment (MDE) submitted the "lotal Maxtmum Daily Loads oJNitrogen
and Phosphorus for the Baltimore I1arbor in Anne ArundeL Carroll and Howard Counties
Baltimore City. Ma~'land dated December 2006 (TMDL Report), to EPA for final review by
letter dated December 14, 2006, which was received by EPA on December 19, 2006. The
TMDI. Report includes two Technical Memoranda, Significant Nutrient Point Sources in the
Baltimore Ilarbor (Patapsco River Mesohaline) Watershed and Significant Nutrient Nonpoint
Sources in the Bahmlore tlarbor (Patapsco River Mesoholine) Watershed.
The TMDL report as submitted by the MDE establishes TMDI.s for nutrients that:
(1) are protective of aquatic life in all areas of the Harbor with the exception of the Deep
Channel (dredged navigation channel); (2) meet Maryland's and the District's nutrient-related
water quality standards with the exception of the Deep Channel; and (3) specifically meet the
numeric criteria for dissolved oxygen and Chlorophyl 'a'.
Based on this review, EPA determined that the lbllowing seven regulatory requirements
have been met for all areas of the Ilarbor with the exception of the Deep Channel. We will
address the Deep Channel later in this Decision Rationale.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
The TMDL is designed to implement applicable water quality standards.
The TMDL includes a total allowable load as well as individual wasteload
allocations and load allocations.
The TMDL considers the impacts of background pollutant contributions.
The TMDL considers critical environmental conditions.
The TMDL considers seasonal environmental variations.
The TMDL includes a margin ofsafety.
The TMDL has been subject to public participation.
In addition, I-PA considered whether there was reasonable assurance that the load
allocations for the nonpoint sources in the TMDI.s would be met.
ilL
Impairments Identified by the District and Maryland
The Baltimore Harbor was first identified on the section 303(d) List of impaired waters
(the 1996 list) as impaired by nutrients due to signs of eutrophication, expressed as high levels of
chlorophyl 'a' (chl "a') and low concentrations of dissolved oxygen (DO). MDE uses measures
of DO and chl "a' to understand the impacts of nutrients on the ecosystem. For this reason, MDE
established TMDLs for nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) in the Harbor.
The Baltimore Harbor has also been identified on the impaired v, aters list as impaired by
bacteria (1998), toxics (1998), metals (1998), suspended sediment (1996), and biological impacts
(2004). Although in some cases it may be efficient to address all ofthe identified impairments in
a particular water body at the same time in a single TMDL, it is not a requirement of the CWA or
-2-
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
EPA's regulations for TMDLs to be established that way. In this particular case, the TMDI.s
submitted by MDI" were developed to address the excessive nutrient issue only.
EPA finds that these TMDLs designed to restore and maintain the aquatic life uses in
their respective waters are in accordance with the CWA's Section 303(d) requirements to resolve
the listed impairment and achieve the applicable water qualiD, standards (with the exception of
the Dccp Channel). EPA also agrees that the "FMDI.s. once implemented, will improve the v, ater
quality of the Ilarbor.
As discussed belo',,, the criteria used as the end points for the TMDLs are dissolved oxygen
(DO) criteria and chl 'a" critieria. The Harbor has several criteria for DO. depending on the area
of the tlarbor. These criteria were de',cloped for aquatic life protection.
IV.
Allocation Summary
TMDLs are established at a level necessary to attain and maintain existing applicable
water quality standards, with the exception of the Deep Channel. The nutrient loading
allocations in these TMI)I.s were developed to assure that all applicable water quality standards
related to aquatic life use would be attained and maintained.
Tables I, 2.3 and 4 below summarize the allocations developed in this TMDI.. In
addition to the daily loads, the allocations are presented as annual loads and seasonal loads.
Seasonal loads were included since the DO and chl 'a" criteria include seasonal considerations.
In addition to the following summary tables, technical memoranda were included with the
"I'MDI. that contain more specific allocations by source. These allocations are part of the TMDL
and will be discussed in a later section of this Decision Rationale.
Table 1: Growing Season Allocations
Total Nitrogen
Ibs/growing~ason
Total Phosphorus
Ibs/growing ~ason
459,912
1.642.014
33.204
10,620
2,145,750
12,776
113,212
22,484
316
149,152
NonpointSources
Point Sources
Future Allocation
Total
t
'
Table 2: Average Annual Allocations
Total Nitrogen
Nonpoint Sources
Point Sources
it:uture Allocation
'MOS
I Total
Ibs/year
1,246,036
3,976,215
66.410
35,302
5,323,963
-3-
Phosphorus
Ibs/year
Total
34,654
243,127
45,690
838
324009
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Nonpoint Sources
Point Sources
Future Allocations
MOS
. Total
Table 3: Daily Allocations - Seasonal Basis
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Ibs/day
Ibs/day
2,500
69.4
8,924
615.3
180.5
122.2
57.7
1.72
11,662
811
Values may not add due to rounding
Table 4: Daily Allocations - Annual Basis
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Ibs/day
Ibs/day
Nonpoint sources
3,413
94.9
Point Sources
10,893
666
: Future Allocations
181.9
125.2
' MOS
96.7
2.29
Total
14,586
888
Values may no! add due Io rounding
V.
Background
Baltimore Itarbor Watershed
The watershed draining into the Harbor is the Patapsco River Watershed, which includes
Jones Falls, Gwynns Falls, Colgate Creek, Bear Creek, Curtis Creek, Stony Creek, and Rock
Creek. The Patapsco River Mesohaline (PATMH) segment, or the Baltimore Harbor estuary, is
located on the west side of the Chesapeake Bay. The Harbor estuary is the 15 mile tidal region
ofthe lower Patapsco River.
Table 5: Baltimore Harbor Subwatersheds within Mar,'land
Subwatersheds
Area (acres)
Owynns Falls
'
41,701
Jones Falls
37,273
Patapsco River
130,662
Baltimore l larbor
59,035
Total
268,671
Natural depths in the Itarbor are generally less than 20 feet except in the main navigation
channel maintained by the Corp of Engineers. These maintained depths are 50 feet. The tidal
range of the Harbor is about I thor.
-4-
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
The land use in the llarbor Watcrshed is diverse. The land use is presented in Table 6.
Table 6: Land Use in the Harbor Draina ge
Land U ~
Acres
Water
1%
1806
Forest
29%
77077
A~riculture
15%
41848
Urban
55%
147940
Point Sources
The Patapsco Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and Cox Creek WWTP are
municipal point sources that discharge directly to the Harbor. There are 5 industrial sources.
The annual Ioadings of nitrogen and phosphorus from these sources during the model calibration
period are shov, n in Table 7.
Table 7: Nutrient Loadings from Municipal and Industrial Sources
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
Annual Load
Annual Load
Municipal
3.455,063
216,099
Industrial
3,00..015
89,376
Total
6~456,078
305,475
Nonpoint Sources
The loads from urban stormv, ater and nonpoint sources were estimated using the HSPF
model (1 lydrologic Simulation Program Fortran). The estimated existing loads (for the
calibration period) are shown in Table 8.
Urban
Stormwater
Asriculture
Other
Total
VI.
Table 8: Loadings from Non mint Sources
Total Nitrogen
Total Phosphorus
% of
%of
Annual Load
Annual Load
Total
Total
12
29
12
5
1,364,400
8
6
37,465
Existing Water Quali~'
The Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Monitoring Program has recorded measurements in
the Harbor indicating anoxic and hypoxic events occur as earl3,' as April and extend until October
every year. Increased algal blooms have been found to occur yearly during the ',,.arm season.
Anoxic conditions occur at the bottom of the navigation channel as well as most tributaries.
MDE suggests that the origin of the low DO in the Ilarbor is not from anoxic Bay water but from
-5-
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
the Harbor's internal processes. Surface DO concentrations did not f~ll below 5 mg/I. Bottom
water DO values ranged from 0 mg/I to 11 mg/I.
Chl 'a' observations show values above the 50ug/l criteria every year, with a seasonal
pattern of higher values during the warm months. Concentrations rarely exceed 100ug/I. Bottom
chl 'a' values are normally below 20ug/I.
A detailed discussion of the llarbor water quality can be found in the TMDL report.
VII.
Technical Approach
Modeling Framework
MDE chose a set of time-variable "~,ater quality models as the tool to link the sources of
nutrient Ioadings to the DO criteria and chl 'a' goals. The computational framework chosen for
these TMDLs is the three dimensional, time-variable Baltimore ttarbor Eutrophication Model
(BHEM). This water quality simulation package provides a generalized fi'amework for modeling
nutrient fate and transport in surface waters. The BHEM includes a watershed model, a
hydrodynamic model, a water quality model and a sediment flux model. The BHEM was
calibrated to reproduce observed water quality characteristics for 1992 - 1997 conditions. The
calibrated model was peered reviewed by various modeling technical groups. The model and
calibration process is described in more detail in the TMDL. report as well as a separate modeling
report.
TMDL Analysis F r a m e w o r k
The nutrient TMDL analysis consisted of two broad elements: an assessment ofgrowing
season loading conditions and an assessment of average annual loading conditions. Both the
growing season and the average annual flow condition represent the critical conditions under
which the symptoms of eutrophication are typically most acute. Maryland adopted the
Chesapeake Bay DO criteria and its associated attainment methodology, utilizing DO biological
reference curves to represent the spatial and temporal distribution of DO concentrations. MDE
applied the method using the Cumulative Frequency Distributions for the Harbor generated from
model output and compared against the CBP reference curves to assess spatial and temporal DO
criteria exceedences.
Model results were compared to the quantitative implementation of the narrative chl 'a'
criteria as: (I) ensuring that instantaneous concentrations remain below 100 ug/I at all times; and
(2) minimizing exceedences of the 50 ug/l, 30-day rolling average, to a frequency that will not
result in ecologically undesirable conditions.
Model Scenarios
MDE ran several scenarios: (I) baseline conditions; (2) future conditions (the TMDI.);
and (3) maximum anthropogenic reduction from the Baltimore Harbor. The baseline serves as
the existing condition for a point of reference to compare future reduction needs. The future
-6-
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
condition is the TMDL. The third scenario was used as a bounding exercise to determine if is
possible to achieve water quality standards in the Deep Channel.
The baseline ','.as run for the years 1995 to 1997, which represent a v, et, dry and average
)'ear. The attainment results for DO for the baseline is shown in Table 9. The chl 'a' analysis
shov, ed that in both surface and bottom water chl "a' concentrations exceeded 50ug/I during
earl)' spring and the summer months of 1995 and occasionally were predicted to exceed 100ug!l.
Table 9: DO Water Quality Attainment at the Baseline Condition
% Nonattainment
Period
Designated Use
Feb 1~t to Ma) 31 st
June I St to Sept 30 th
Oct I st tO Jan 31 st
Feb ]st to Jan 3 l st
Migrator), fish spawning and
__
nurse~'
Open Water
Deep Water
Deep Channel
()pen Water
Open Water
3%
3%
23%
87%
2%
0%
Model results fbr the maximum removal ofanthropogenic sources showed that DO
concentrations will be less than Img/I in the Deep Channel for approximately 57.8% of the time
and volume. The Deep Channel criteria arc not met under this scenario. Hydrodynamic
conditions of the Harbor system create conditions whereby the I larbor channel becomes anoxic
for periods in the summer.
The TMDL scenario was based o n a simulation with: ( I ) WWTP discharges set at design
flow and nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations base on Maryland's Enhanced Nutrient
Reduction strategy; (2) industrial discharges based on permitted flow and concentrations of
nitrogen and phosphorus based on estimates of loading reductions due to technological
improvements; and (3) urban stormwater and agricultural loads from all watersheds reduced by
15%. The municipal concentrations are consistent with Maryland's Tributary Strategy and ENR
policy. Results of the TMI)I. scenario are shown in Table 10.
Table 10: Attainment of DO Water Criteria for TMDL Condition
% Nonattainment
Designated use
Period
Feb ISt to May 31 '~
Migrator), and fish spawning
0%
and nurser),
June I ~t to Sept 30 th
Open Water
0%
Deep Water
7%
Deep Channel
78.5%
(~ct IStto Jan 31 s~
0%
Open Water
As can be seen the DO criteria is met everywhere except the Deep Channel. This is not
unexpected since the more critical condition of removal of all of the anthropogenic loads would
not achieve DO criteria in the Deep Channel. The chl 'a' concentrations remain below 50ug/I in
both the surface and bottom waters, indicating attainment of the narrative criteria for chl "a'.
-7-
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
VIII. Discussions of Regulatory Requirements
EPA has determined that these TMDLs are consistent with statutory and regulatory
requirements and EPA policy and guidance with the exception of the Deep Channel. EPA's
rationale for approving the TMI)Ls for the ttarbor with the exception of the Deep Channel is set
forth according to the regulatory requirements listed below.
The TMDI, is the sum of the individual WLAs for point sources and the LAs for
nonpoint sources and natural background and must include a MOS. The TMDI, is commonly
expressed as:
TMDL = ~WI,As +.~LAs + MOS
Where:
WI,A I,A
=
MOS
1.
v, aste load allocation
load allocation
margin of safety
The TMDLs are designed to implement the applicable water quality standards.
The TMDLs were designed to address the eutrophication problem in the Harbor. The DO
criteria and narrative chl "a' were used as the endpoints to address the water quality problem.
Table I I shows the DO criteria applicable to the Harbor.
Designated Use II Subcategory
Seasonal migrator3, l]sh spawning
and nurser'./
Seasonal shallow water
submerged aquatic ve6etation
Open water fish and shellfish
Seasonal deep water fish and
shellfish
Seasonal deep channel refuge
Table 1 I: DO Criteria
Period
Dissolved Oxygen Criteria
Feb I~tto May 31 st
Open water criteria apply
April 15t to Oct 31 st
Open water criteria apply
Jan 1~ to Dec 31 st
5.0mg/I 30-day average
June I st to Sept 30 t"
3.0mg/I 30-day average with
a 7% variance allowed
>_ I mg/I instantaneous
minimium
June ]st to Sept 30 th
As discussed above, the "I'MDL allocations met all DO criteria with the exception of the
Deep Channel DO. Further, the maximum removal ofanthropogenic sources still did not allow
the Deep Channel DO criteria to be met. There is a reasonable allocation scenario to meet all of
the other DO criteria. Therefore, EPA believes the TMDL meets the water quality standards
requirements for all areas of the I larbor except the Deep Channel. M DE should reconsider this
portion of the Harbor by including it on the state's section 303(d) List, consider a Use
Attainability Analysis and re-evaluate the water quality and allocation needs for the Deep
Channel.
The state's chl 'a" criterion states "Chlorophyll a - Concentrations of chlorophyll a in
free-floating microscopic aquatic plants (algae) shall not exceed levels that result in ecologically
-8-
10090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
undesirable consequences that would render tidal waters unsuitable for designated uses". MDE
used EPA guidance as well as other technical sources to determine undesirable concentrations.
MDE's interpretation of the narrative criteria for chl 'a' in the Harbor is comprised of the
following:
I. Ensure that instantaneous concentrations remain bclm~, 100ug/I at all times, and
2. Minimize e×ceedences of'the 50ug/I, 30-da3, rolling average to a frequency that will
not result in ecologically undesirable conditions.
The T M I ) I . scenario shov, ed that chl 'a' concentrations remain below 50ug/I in both the
surface and bottom waters indicating attainment o f the narrative criteria.
I.il ~ '~ I)eli¢; t'.. Ill,It the 1%11)1.~.~t.rt. dc,.i~n¢(I tl) ianlllCmt'nl tilt' 1)(9 '*~att.r tltl~llil ~ crilt.rkl
and sl:lrr:lli', v t.hl ';t' L'ritt'l'i~l t~lr ~li~r~ll(Ir'~ l"i~h and h,ll:i~ .i[t~ and ()pen %~,:llt'r
th:~.i,,n;ttt'd u,..',,, int.lnding till' I)t't.p ~,~,;llcl" ", ;,ri;.wL.. I Io~ t.~,t.r. lilt" I)() t'ritt.ria Ibr Ih~:
I)twlt ('h;ItLnt.I ',~ill n.t bt. ;ttl;lint'd undt'r lilt' IIrclp~.,cd ;llbw;lli~m ~ct.llaricl.
.
T h e T M D L s i n c l u d e a total a l l o w a b l e load as well as i n d i v i d u a l w a s t e l o a d
allocations a n d load allocations.
The T M D L report includes allocations for all sources for annual, seasonal and daily
conditions. The associated technical memoranda include specific allocations for all individual
point sources and categories ofnonpoint sources. The general allocations are presented above in
Section IV and the specific point source allocations are contained in the technical memorandurn
and repeated belo'~. Note that I'PA calculated the dail3, loads based on the annual and seasonal
loads provided b) the state in the technical memorandum. The daily loads based on the annual
allocations were calculated by dividing the annual loads by 365. The daily loads based on the
seasonal allocations were calculated by dividing the seasonal loads by 184.
-9-
FERC
~0090603-0005
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Table 12: Growing_~ason Point Source Allocations
Source Name
Permit Number
Nutrient L o a d s Ibs/season
TN
TP
+
Patapsco WWTP
Cox Creek WWTP
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
International Steel
....
Group
W.R.Grace
Erachem-Comilol~
US Gypsum
Millenium
Millenium
Cox Creek DMCF
Baltimore City
i
i
I......
MD0021601
MD0021661
MD0001201-101
333,330
68,484
31,795
33,330
6,852
264
MD0001201-012
304,590
15,230
MD0001201-014
158,388
7,632
MD0001201-017
17,058
2,814
MD0001201-021
52,392
2,622
MD0000311
MD0001775
MD0001457
MD0001279-001
MD0001279-002
MD0068292
155,370
47,502
192
4,338
6,750
52,601
102,306
1,236
6
30
0
0
2,556
10,164
MD0068306
73,662
7,314
MD68314
167,784
4.662
MD006833 I
28,644
2,844
MD0068322
. .
36,828
3,660
1,642,014
113212
stormwater
, Anne Arundel
stormwater
Baltimore County
stormwater
Carroll Count2,'
stormwater
: Howard County
i stormwater
.
.
.
Total
+ 10-
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Table 13: Daily Loads based on Growing Season Point Source Allocations
Permit Number
Nutrient Loads - Ibs/day
Source Name
TN
TP
Patapsco WWTP
MD0021601
1,812
18 I
Cox Creek WWTP
MD0021661
372
37
Steel
MD0001201 - I 01
173
1.43
Steel
MD000120 I-012
1,655
83
Steel
MI)0001201-014
861
41
Steel
MD0001201-017
93
15
Steel
MI)0001201-021
285
14
MD000031 I
844
7
MD0001775
258
0.033
US Gypsum
Millenium
MD0001457
MD0001279-001
192
24
0.163
0
Millenium
MD0001279-002
37
0
286
14
International
Group
International
Group
International
Group
International
Group
International
Group
W.R.Grace
Erachem-Comilog
Cox Creek DMCF
Baltimore City
stormv, ater
Anne Arundel
stormv, ater
Baltimore Count)'
stormwater
MD0068292
556
55
MD0068306
400
40
MD68314
912
25
Carroll Count',
stormwater
H o'.~,ard County
stormwatcr
Total
MI)0068331
156
15
MD0068322
200
20
8,924
615
-11-
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Table 14: Annual Point Allocations
! Source Name
Permit Number
I
Patapsco WWTP
Cox Creek WWTP
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
W.R.Grace
Erac hem-Corn ilo~,
US Gypsum
M illenium
Millenium
Cox Creek DMCF
Baltimore City
stormwater
Anne Arundel
stormwater
Baltimore County
stormv,ater
Carroll Count '
stormwater
Howard County
stormwater
Total
Nutrient Loads -Ib~year
MD0021601
MD0021661
MD0001201-101
TN
889,453
182364
63,590
TP
66,709
13,707
526
MD0001201-012
609,185
30,459
MD0001201-014
316,776
15,267
MD0001201-017
34,114
5,625
MD0001201-021
104,785
5,240
MD0000311
MD0001775
MD0001457
MD0001279-001
MD0001279-002
310,737
95,000
384
8,670
13,495
462,164
221,274
2,475
12
64
0
0
7,240
23,951
159,318
17,245
MD68314
362.890
39,279
MD0068331
61,957
6,706
MD0068322
79,659
8,622
3~976,215
243~127
MD0068292
MI)0068306
:
-12-
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Table 15: Dailv Loads based on Annual Allocations
Source Name
Permit Number
Nutrient Loads - Ibs/day
TN
TP
Patapsco WWTP
MD0021601
2,437
183
Cox Creek WWTP
MD0021661
501
38
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
International Steel
Group
MD0001201 -I 01
174
1.44
MD0001201-012
1,669
83
MD0001201-014
868
42
International Steel
Group
MD0001201-017
93
15
International Steel
Group
MD0001201-021
287
14
W.R.Grace
Erachem-Comilog
MD0000311
MD0001775
851
260
7
0.033
US Gypsum
Millcnium
Millenium
Cox Creek DMCF
MD0001457
MD0001279-001
MD0001279-002
1.05
24
37
0.175
0
0
1.266
20
MD0068292
606
66
MD0068306
436
47
MD68314
994
108
Carroll County
stormv, ater
MD006833 I
170
18
Howard Count','
stormwater
MD0068322
218
24
107894
666
Baltimore City
stormwater
Anne Arundel
stormv.ater
Baltimore County
stormv, ater
Total
-13-
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
The specific nonpoint source allocations are provided by the State in the Technical
Memorandum: Significant Nutrient Nonpoint Sources in the Baltimore Harbor (Patapsco River
Mesohaline) Watershed. They are not repeated here.
I'1' % helle', c.. the I)r-I~l)'.ed I MIll.,, nlccl the ic(luir¢lllt'nl I(t inch.h' total h+ad', as +~t.II at.
%%il~|t.'lOil(I ;dlr~t'ali()ll,,
3.
:lllil h~;id ;tllt)¢;lli~Jns.
]'he T M D L s consider the impacts of background pollutant contributions.
All loads of nutrients outside of the modeling domain were considered as background
loads to the model. These loads were identified in the allocation tables as allocations to
upstream subwatersheds
I(1' % bclic~.t's lilt' pr4ql~,cd 1%11)1.~ apllrl)priatcly cf~n.dllcrcd impacts .,i" hack~rl~n.d
[)(~1111t;in I t.'l HI I i'i I1 u f ill n ,,.
4.
The T M D L s consider critical environmental conditions.
The TMDL Report considers critical environmental conditions by modeling the
~vatershed using daily simulations for three years. The three years represent average flow in the
Itarbor, a wetter than avcrage year, and a drier than average year based on precipitation data and
accounts for various hydrological conditions. The simulation period was from 1995 to 1997.
I'~P '~ Ill'lie&c', Iht' pr.l..'.cd 1%1I)1 • m c c t the r't'quir-t'mcnt I . c . n q d c r the crivical
~11% il'(llllllt'nlill
5.
t'qllldifiOIl',.
The T M D L s consider seasonal environmental variations.
The TMDI. Report considers seasonal variations by modeling the watershed using daily
simulations for three years with seasonal data as appropriate. The critical condition and
seasonality was accounted for in the TMDL analysis by the choice of simulation period. 19951997. This three-year time period represents a relatively dry year, wet year, and average year,
based on precipitation data and accounts for various hydrological conditions.
H ' A IIclic',c, lilt" pr.ll,.,cd I M I ) I • Iuccl the rt'(luirt'lllCnl It) c~.n.;idcr s¢ll..Ol|al
CI1% il'~|lllll?fll;ll
6.
& al'i;ltion,
The T M D L s include a margin of safety.
The CWA and EPA's TMDL regulations require TMDLs to include a margin of safety to
take into account any lack of knowledge concerning the relationship between effluent limitations
and water quality. EPA guidance suggests two approaches to satisfy the MOS requirement.
First, it can be met implicitly by using conservative model assumptions to develop the TMDI.
and its allocations. Alternately, it can be met explicitly by allocating a portion of the allowable
load to the MOS. The MOS in these TMDI.s is explicit as 5% of the agricultural loads.
-14-
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
I(l' '~ bclic'.c,; the pt'~Jl~,b',c;I I ~ll)l • lllCCt the rcquircmcunl t,~ include a iIl~ll'-il| ol'~,:Jfcl~..
7.
The TMDLs have been subject to public participation.
MDE conducted a public review of the proposed "I'MDLs for nitrogen and phosphorus for
the Ilarbor. The public comment period was open from June 6, 2006 to July 5, 2006. MDE
received five sets of comments. Comments were received from Anne Arundel County (tv.,o from
the Department of Public Works, and one from the Office of Environmental and Cultural
Resources); and Baltimore County and Chesapeake Bay Foundation (CBF) (2 individual
comments). MDE responded to all comments. The comments and responses were included v, ith
the TMDL submitted to EPA. MDE also hosted a Baltimore Ilarbor TMDL Stakeholder
Advisory Group (SAG).
The CBF continued to have concerns with the TMDI,s after the close of the comment
period and after receipt of MDE's response to their initial comments. MDE continued to discuss
and meet with the CBF to attempt to resolve the issues before FPA took final action on the
TMDLs as submitted by the state. The CBF's main concerns included the apparent large
increase in allocated loads between the 2003 presentation to the SAG and the final TMDL and
the fact that the standards were not met everywhere in the Harbor. MDE met most recentl> on
November 5, 2007, to resolve the issues. A letter dated December 3, 2007, responded to the
CBF concerns. EPA believes that MDE's response adequately addressed the CBF concerns.
FPA belle'.or, Ihc prop.',cd "1MIll, meets., tile rctluirclnclll 1~1pro". idc adCtlUalc opI,J,'lutfil )
Ior p . h l i c participali¢.l.
IX.
There is reasonable a ~ u r a n c e that the proposed LAs can be met.
The TMDI, report included a section on "'Assurance of Implementation". The
implementation of point source nutrient controls that will be an integral component to meet water
quality standards in the Harbor will be executed through the state's Enhanced Nutrient Reduction
(ENR) strategy and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. The
ENR program provides grant funds to local governments to retrofit or upgrade WWTPs from
BNR to ENR at their currently approved design capacity. Deadlines for completion of" ENR
upgrades will be incorporated into NPDES permits based on the State's ENR upgrade schedule.
The implementation of the stormwater and nonpoint source controls will be through two
approaches - stormwater NPDES permits and cooperative agricultural reductions. The five
jurisdictions are required to participate in the stormwater NPDt'S program. Subsequently,
stormwater management programs have been implemented by the Counties and the City to
control MS4 discharges to the maximum extent practicable. Additional significant planned
implementation measures in the I larbor Watershed involve the upgrade or separation of
combined sev.'er systems in the City and the upgrade of sanitat3" sewer systems in Baltimore
County.
Ma~'land's Water Quality Improvement Act requires that comprehensive and
enforceable nutrient management plans be developed, approved and implemented for all
agricultural lands throughout Maoland. The Act requires that nutrient management plans for
-15-
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
nitrogen be completed and implemented b.', 2002, and plans for phosphorus ~ completed by
2005. Other nonpoint source control plans are described in the TMDI. report.
-16-
3090603-0005 FERC PDF
MDE
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
1800 Washington Boulevard • Baltimore MD 21230
410-537-3000 • 1-800-633-6101
Shari T. Wilson
Secretary
Martin O'Malley
Governor
Anthony G. Brown
Lieutenant Governor
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D.
Deputy Secretary
April24,2009
Mr. Joseph P. DaVia
Chief, Maryland Section Northern
Regulatory Branch
Baltimore District, Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1715
Baltimore, MD 21203-1715
Kent J. Morton
Project Manager
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC
4300 Wilson Boulevard
Arlington, VA 22203
Dear Mssrs. DaVia & Morton:
I am writing with regard to the Clean Water Act, Section 401 Water Quality Certification
("WQC") for the AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express LLC (collectively "AES')
Dredging and Pipeline Project ("Project"). The Joint Permit Application for proposed impacts to
jurisdictional wetlands and waterways was received on January 8, 2007 (Corps of Engineers
Application CENAB-OP-RMN 2007-01644-MI6). The project includes the following
discharges pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: (1) approximately 171 stream
crossings through approximately 23 acres of wetlands and other navigable waters associated with
the pipeline; (2) installation of a retaining wall along the shoreline of the proposed terminal
facility; and (3) discharge of decant water from the contaminated sediments dredged from
Baltimore Harbor.
On January 9, 2007, the Maryland Department of the Environment ("MDE" or "the
Department") received the AES application for a Coastal Facilities Review Act CCFRA") permit
from the State of Maryland. The CFRA provides for a consolidated review of all of the
environmental permits required by the Department under the Environment Article of the State of
Maryland. The authorizations related to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") review of
the project include the Tidal Wetlands License for the proposed dredging and dredged material
disposal and the Nontidal Wetlands and Waterways Permit for construction of the proposed
pipeline. Neither application included an express request for a water quality certification under §
401 of the Clean Water Act.
RecycledPaper
www.mde.stato.rnd.us
"ITYUse~ 1-800-735-2258
Via Ma~la.d Relay Service
0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Mssrs. DaVia & Morton
April 24, 2009
Page 2
On April 25, 2008 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") and the Corps
issued a Joint Public Notice announcing the availability of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement ("EIS") for the project. Consistent with the established coordination practices
between MDE and the Corps, the Public Notice contained the Corps' request that MDE review
the proposed Section 404 discharges for compliance with the State's water quality standards.
The Notice also stated that the Section 401 certifying agency has a statutory limit of one year in
which its decision. Accordingly, the State has until April 25, 2009, to make its decision on the
WQC.
In early December, 2008, FERC released the Final EIS for the project. Based on letters from
the Corps to FERC and to AES on the still pending outstanding information necessary to make
its permit decision, AES requested, by letter dated March 16, 2009, that the Corps suspend
processing of its application. By letter dated March 25, 2009, the Corps officially withdrew the
AES application for a Section 10/Section 404 permit. Since Corps regulations do not address the
effect of a withdrawal of an application on the timeframe for a WQC decision, it is not clear
whether the State must still make a decision on the WQC by April 25, 2009. However, the State
is rendering its decision herein in order to ensure that the State's certification is not inadvertently
waived by operation of law.
The Department has been an active participant in the review o f the proposed AES Sparrows
Point LNG Facility. Regarding the proposed impacts to wetlands and waterways, MDE
requested additional information by letters dated May 7, 2007, August 15, 2007, and January 23,
2008. Despite the additional information provided by AES in response both to these requests
and the requests of other resource agencies, there remains outstanding information/issues
regarding the proposed impacts to wetlands, waterways, and water quality. These issues were
discussed in the State's comments on the Draft and Final EIS dated June 16, 2008, and January
13, 2009, respectively. These issues are summarized below:
. Final Disposition of the Processed Dredged Material. AES proposes to dredge
approximately 3.7 million cubic yards o f contaminated sediments and to process the
material by mixing it with reagent admixtures - principally portland cement - and market
it as a beneficial product. Although the Final EIS accepts the premise that the processed
dredged material ("PDM") would be suitable for use in landfill grading, mine
reclamation, and a variety of other uses, no specific end users are identified, nor is there
any evaluation of the potential environmental impact of these end uses.
In the event that the PDM is not marketable as a beneficial product, AES has indicated
that two companies, Waste Management and Allied Waste Services, are willing to accept
"environmentally suitable" material at landfills in Northern Virginia. However, neither
company has entered into a binding, enforceable commitment to accept the PDM and,
consequently, there is no guarantee that the PDM will be appropriately managed in the
event markets do not materialize. Without such guarantees, the possibility remains that
the PDM will be stockpiled at the terminal, which does not have adequate space or
pollution control measures for the large volume of material that would be stockpiled.
Accordingly, AES has not demonstrated that the PDM will ultimately be managed to
ensure compliance with water quality standards.
3090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Mssrs. DaVia & Morton
April 24, 2009
Page 3
Furthermore, AES has not provided test results analyzing the leaching potential of the
PDM. While AES has provided data concerning other material dredged from other
locations, it has not done so with respect to the largely contaminated material that would
be dredged from Baltimore Harbor. Without those data, the Department cannot conclude
that the ultimate disposal of the PDM - whether stockpiled on the Site or re-used as a
beneficial product - will not cause or contribute to a violation o f State water quality
standards.
. 118-Aere Anoxic/Hypoxic Areas from the Proposed Dredging and TMDL Issue~. AES
proposes to dredge an approximately 118-acre turning basin adjacent to the terminal to a
depth o f approximately 45 feet. The dredging will take place within waters of the
Patapsco River designated as Use II waters, see COMAR 26.08.02.08K(2)(b), and to
which a seasonally variable dissolved oxygen ("DO") water quality standard applies,
ranging from 6 mg/1 under certain circumstances to 1 mg/l for seasonal deep channel
refuges. See id., COMAR 26.08.02.03-3C(8)Co)(1), (0(I).
During the summer months, the presence o f a pycnocline - i.e., a high density layer o f
water that separates the deep, cooler, more saline waters from the less saline, warmer
surface waters - acts as a barrier to the ability of bottom waters to mix with the upper
layers, with the result that waters below the pycnocline experience dissolved oxygen
levels at or near zero mg/l. At this level, no aquatic life can survive. Existing data
indicate that, within Baltimore Harbor, this phenomenon generally occurs at
approximately 30 feet of depth. This is reflected in Figure 1 below:
lw r & ) ~0~4.Z#073
0
O0 ( ~
2
•
~2ns
6
8
- k'~6
0
*0
0 JHut)
2
0o tmt~
4
6
$
13
'1
10
15,
35.
3~
t.o
4%
53
Figure 1: DO Profiles in the Baltimore Harbor Main Channel and Extent of anoxia in
Proposed Dredge Site; Minimum DO by depth (during May-September)
By dredging to 45 feet, the AES project will both increase the volume of water lying
below the point at which DO falls to zero rag/1 and decrease the areal extent of the
submerged bottom that currently lies above the 30-foot line and at which aquatic life can
survive. This is illustrated by the following schematic:
~0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Mssrs. DaVia & Morton
April 24, 2009
Page 4
5 . 2 mllEon ~3
f
currently/ mnoxJc,r~
30
7 2 m i l l i o n ft I
to
be
¢ltwl'lg~d
,H ,;
new~
H
Ilnoxl~
,,H
,,H
, ,
4511
At current depths, the Department estimates that 4% (5.2 million ft3) of the volume o f
water currently within the proposed dredge area is anoxic. Dredging the site to 45 feet
will result in an additional 72 million ~ ofanoxic water. At that time 33% of the total
water volume within the area will be anoxic. With respect to submerged lands, the
proposed dredging will eliminate areas that currently provide habitat for aquatic life and
replace it with an approximately 118-acre area in which no benthic organisms can
sur3/1ve.
While the Department issued a license in 2005 for Barletta-Willis, Inc., to dredge an area
within the area proposed to be dredged by AES, the Department has since completed a
nutrient Total Maximum Daily Load ("TMDL") for Baltimore Harbor and determined
that water quality standards for dissolved oxygen were not achievable, in part because of
the presence of anoxic/hypoxic areas within portions o f the Harbor. See Exhibit 1 (Total
Maximum Daily Loads of Nitrogen and Phosphorus for the Baltimore Harbor in Anne
Arundel, Baltimore, Carroll and Howard Counties and Baltimore City, Maryland (Dec.
2006)). The anoxia/hypoxia and TMDL issues are noted in MDE's comments on the
Draft EIS with a request that FERC "clearly acknowledge" in the Final EIS "that this
project would result in the permanent loss of the area being dredged as a viable
component of the ecosystem. The EIS should also note that appropriate
mitigation/compensation will be provided to offset the environmental loss." The Final
EIS does not acknowledge the 118-acre permanent loss of aquatic habitat and impact on
water quality, instead characterizing that impact as temporary. It does, however, require
AES to continue its coordination with State and federal resource agencies concerning the
DO impact, including the development o f any necessary mitigation plans. Although
AES, in September 2008, submitted a revised Aquatic Resources Mitigation Plan
recognizing the potential for low DO in the dredged area, that plan did not propose
mitigation specifically for the creation of additional anoxic/hypoxic areas.
The increase in hypoxic/anoxic areas cannot be directly mitigated through conditions
imposed on a § 401 water quality certification; the habitat that currently exists in the area
to be dredged, while impaired, will simply cease to exist in its entirety ifAES proceeds as
proposed. In the event that AES resumes its coordination with State and federal resource
agencies, as required by FERC, and proposes measures to mitigate indirectly the water
3090603-0005 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Mssrs. DaVia & Morton
April 24, 2009
Page 5
quality impact o f the dredging, MDE will consider those measures and re-visit its
certification decision at that time.
. Final Pipeline Route and Avoidance/Minimization of Pipeline Impacts. while the Final
EIS identifies a pipeline route, approximately 16.5 miles o f the proposed route has not
been surveyed because AES has not been granted access to the affected properties.
Because AES has not prepared final plans depicting the specific areas and resources to be
affected by the pipeline in these areas, the Department is not in a position to determine
that the Project meets applicable water quality standards.
Moreover, with respect to the many wetland and stream crossings required by the Project,
the State of Maryland is on record as urging the minimization of impacts to these
resources by crossing them via horizontal directional drilling ("HDD") instead of
trenching. The Final EIS, however, does not include complete evaluations and plans for
HDD crossings at a number of locations, including Wild Cat Branch, Back River,
Gunpowder Falls, Little Gunpowder Falls, White Marsh Run, Winters Run, and Deer
Creek. Although AES has provided additional information to the Corps since the release
of the Final EIS on these crossings, some o f this information conflicts with
recommendations in the EIS. For example, the EIS recommends, and the FERC Order
requires, HDD at White Marsh Run and Winters Run. AES, however, continues to argue
in additional information recently provided to the Corps that HDD crossings at White
Marsh Run and Winters Run are not justified. With respect to Deer Creek, its
designation as a Tier 11 water, see COMAR 26.08.02.04-10, its status as a State Scenic &
Wild River, Md. Code Ann., Nat. Res. § 8-402(a)(2), and the presence of sensitive
species (e.g., the Maryland darter) all indicate strongly that impacts should be avoided
through the employment of an HDD crossing. AES concedes that HDD is feasible for
Deer Creek, but continues to resist an HDD crossing. The impacts associated with this
one crossing will vary significantly depending on which crossing method is ultimately
employed - a decision that will reached through the ongoing consultation process with
State and federal resource agencies. Until then, with information outstanding on the
potential impacts of the final pipeline route, no final plans, and no final word as to how
AES will cross several sensitive areas, it is not possible to determine if the proposed
pipeline minimizes impacts to wetlands and waterways or otherwise violates applicable
water quality standards.
.
Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Species Impacts. There is consultation ongoing under
Section 7 o f the Endangered Species Act related to the potential impact of the Project on
a variety of rare, threatened, and endangered species, including several aquatic species
(e.g., sea males, sei whales, Maryland darter) that could be adversely affected by the
dredging and stream crossings proposed by AES. Completion of ongoing consultation
regarding these issues will likely not occur until the Fall of this year. Until
consultation/coordination on the Project's potential impacts to State and federally-listed
rare, threatened, and endangered species is complete, the Project is not consistent with
Maryland water quality standards, which are designed, among other things, to ensure
0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Mssrs. DaVia & Morton
April 24, 2009
Page 6
protection o f aquatic life and wildlife, including rare, threatened, and endangered species.
See COMAR 26.08.02.01A, B.
Based on the extent of outstanding information, MDE is unable to conclude that, on this
record, the Project will be carried out in compliance with Maryland water quality standards.
Accordingly, the State of Maryland hereby denies the Clean Water Act, Section 401 Water
Quality Certification for the Project. The Department will reconsider this decision upon the
applicant's fulfillment ofthe above information/consultation requirements. Please note that the
State is continuing to review the AES application for a Coastal Facilities Review Act permit
pursuant to Title 14, Subtitle 5, of the Environment Article, Annotated Code o f Maryland. MDE
will be in contact with AES regarding additional information necessary for the completion of its
review of that application.
Pursuant to § 717r(d)(l) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. § 717r(dXI), AES has the right to
seek review of this decision through a civil action filed with the United States Court of Appeals
for the Fourth Circuit. The record for any such review would be the consolidated record
maintained by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in docket CP07-62-000, CP07-63000, CP07-64-000, and CP07-65-000.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 410-537-3763 or by e-mall at
eghigiarelli@mde.~tate.md.u~.
Sincerely,
Wetlands and Waterways Program
cc: Joanne Wachholder, FERC
Shaft T. Wilson, Secretary, MDE
Adam Snyder, Assistant Attorney General, OAG
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
INDEX OF DOCUMENTS & MATERIALS
Maryland Department of Environment, Water Quality Certification
(Copied from Federal Energy Regulator)' Commission Docket Sheet, Docket CP07-62
ht t p://elibra r),.ferc.gov/idmws/docket_sheet.asp)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07~2
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109.4007
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ,report terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 1.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109.4008
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to s=te, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 10
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109.4009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 11
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4010
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing tts Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 12
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4011
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
aoplication for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E \Environmental Report\Resource Report 13
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4012
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to s~te, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
C P 0 7 ~ 2 . E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 2,
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
20070109-4013
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
apphcation for authorization to s~te, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal under
CP07-62 E\Env;ronmental Report\Resource Report 3
Accession No:
Flied By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4014
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 5
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4015
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E\Environmental Report\Resource Report 6
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4016
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 7
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4017
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 8
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4018
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 9 (zip files of dpi, ado, pro not loaded)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4019
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E \Exhibits\Exhibit A.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4020
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit B
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
2
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
20070109-4021
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for author=zation to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ,mport terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit C
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4022
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied naturat gas =report terminal under
CP07-62 E \Exhibits\Exhibit D
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4023
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal under
CP07-62 . E:\Exhibits\Exhibit E.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4024
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E \Exhibits\Exhibit E-1
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4025
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
aoplication for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit F
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4026
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas pmport terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exfiibits\Exhlbit G
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4027
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit H
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4028
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 2 of 4 containing Volume III to the application for
authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
3
tOO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
Accession No:
05/29/2009
20070109-4029
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4030
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =reportterminal E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 10
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4031
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Re )ort\Resource Report 2
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4032
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mportterminal E \Environmental
Reports\Environmental Re )ort\Resource Report 3
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4033
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Re ~ort\Resource Report 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4034
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 contaimn9 Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Re )ort\Resource Report 6
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4035
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authonzat~on to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Re ~ort\ResourceReport 7
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4036
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 contalmng Volume IV to the application for
authorization to s~te, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal E\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Re ~ort\ResourceReport 8
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
20070109-4037
4
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 9
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4038
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Exhibits
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4039
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 11.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4040
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13\1 lx17 drawings
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4041
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix A - Facility Description
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4042
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix B - Project Schedule
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4043
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorizat=on to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13V~ppendix C - Basis Of Design
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4044
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ,mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix D - Codes and Standards
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
20070109-4045
5
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix E - Permits or Approvals
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4046
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the app[ for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13V~ppendix F - Demonstration of Code Comphance
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4047
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report~Resource Report 13~Appendix G - HAZOP Review
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094048
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CO 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~,Appendix H - Management of Change and Repo
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4049
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix I - Seismic Design
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No:
Description:
200701094050
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix J - Soil Characteristics
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4051
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E ~Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13Vkppendix K - Marine Systems
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
200701094052
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appondix L - LNG Tank Information
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
6
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
11912007
20070109-4053
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~ppend=x M - Equipment Information
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4054
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a hquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix N - Instrumentation
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4055
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~.ppendix O - Electrical
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4056
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13\Appendix P - Fire Protection
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4057
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Vol V to the apl~l for authorization
to site. construct, & operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Envircnmental Report\Resource
Report 13V~ppendix Q - Thermal Radiation and Vapor Dispersion
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4058
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix R - Design Studies
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4059
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13V~.ppendix S - Shutoff Valves
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109--4060
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 contaimng Volume V to the application for
authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E \Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13\Appendix T - Project Spectfications
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
20070109-4061
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~ppendix U - Project Drawings
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4062
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the apphcation for
authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13\Data Request Response Matrix
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
20070109-4063
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal, E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13\Resource Report 13 Text
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4068
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing the Documents to the application
for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under CP07-62
Issued By:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
Filed Date:
1/1112007
Accession NO: 20070111-3014
Description:
Letter informing the Governor of Maryland that AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC filed its
application with the Commission on 1/8/07 under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
11161200
Accession No: 20070116-4021
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD 1 of 3 containing its
Maryland Coastal Facilities Review Act application filed with the Maryland Dept of Environment on 1/8/07
under CP07-62 et al (bpi, ado, adi, pro, et al files not loaded)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
11161200
Accession No: 20070116-4022
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's CD 2 of 3 containing its
Maryland Coastal Facilities Review Act application filed with the Maryland Dept of Environment on 118107
under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
11161200
Accession No: 20070116-4023
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD 3 of 3 containing its
Maryland Coastal Facilities Rewew Act application filed with the Maryland Dept of Environment on 118107
under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LCC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
11171200
20070119-0095
8
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits theqr December
2006 monthly status report for the Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
11181200
Accession No: 20070122-0059
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submit the amended
Exhib=t J to application under CP07-62
Issued By:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION
Filed Date:
112312007
Accession No: 20070123-3022
Description:
Notice of AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's et al 1/8/07 filing of application for
authorization to site, construct and operate a liquefied natural gas receiving terminal and associated
facilities in Baltimore County, MD under CP07-62 et al
Federal Register Citation: 72 FR 4250 Date: 113012007
Issued By:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION
Filed Date:
112512007
Accession No: 20070125-3004
Description:
Errata Notice to the Notice issued on 1/23/07 re AES Sparrow Point LNG LLC and MidAtlantic Express LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
S E N A T E UNITED
,
STATES; HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES
Filed Date:
1/30/2007
Accession No: 20070130-4002
Description:
US Senator Barbara A Mikulskl et al requests that FERC extend the public comment
period relating to consideration of a proposed Liquid Natural Gas facility at Sparrows Point in Baltimore,
MD under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
MARYLAND WATERFOWLERS ASSOCIATION
1/30/2007
20070130-5047
Motion to Intervene of Maryland Waterfowlers Association under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
1/31/2007
20070130-5078
Comment on filing of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC under CP07-62
Issued By:
ENVIRONMENTAL& ENGINEERING REVIEW
Filed Date:
113112007
Accession No: 20070131-4029
Description:
Recordof 1/31/07 Post-Fding Meeting between FERC, AES, Haley & Aldrich, and
Sparrow's Point Shipyard regarding AES Sparrow's Point LNG Project under CP07-62
MARYLAND WATERFOWLERS ASSOCIATION
Filed By:
Filed Date:
2/1/2007
Accession No: 20070201-5016
Amended Motion to Intervene of Maryland Waterfowlers Association under CP07-62. et
Descdption:
al
Filed By:
MARYLANDDEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT ASMENT
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT ASMENT.
Filed Date:
21112007
Accession No: 20070201-5042
9
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Request for Extension of Time for 2 weeks of Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Power Plant Research Program under CP07-62
Filed By:
CONGRESSOF THE UNITED STATES; SENATE, UNITED STATES
Filed Date:
2/2/2007
Accession No: 20070221-0089
Description:
US Senator Barbara A Mikulski et al requests for FERC to extend the public comment
period relating to consideration of a proposed Liquid Natural Gas Facility at Sparrows Point in Baltimore.
Maryland under CP07-62
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
Filed Date:
2/5/2007
Accession No: 20070206-0140
Description:
Commentsof James Lynch expressing concerns regarding the LNG Terminal being built
~n his neighborhood under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
2/5/2007
Filed Date:
Accession No: 20070213-0079
Motion of the LNG Opposition Team to Intervene in the proceeding involving AES
Description:
Sparrows Point LNG LLC under CP07-62
Issued By:
SECRETARYOF THE COMMISSION
Filed Date:
2/6/2007
Accession No: 20070206-3046
Description:
Noticedenying request of the Power Plant Research Program of the Maryland
Department of Natural Resources et al for a two-week extension of time to file a state advisory report re
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's LNG terminal. CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
2/6/2007
Accession No: 20070206-4007
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG et al CD containing an updated list of affected landowners for
the Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline under CP07-62
Filed By:
PENNSYLVANIADEPT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Filed Date:
2/6/2007
Accession No: 20070206-4013
Description:
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources respond to Northern
Ecological Associates, Inc's request about Pennsylvania Natural Diversity inventory etc re the AES
Sparrows Point LNG Terminal Project. CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
BALTIMORECOUNTY (MD)
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
Filed Date:
2/6/2007
AccessJon No: 20070206-5016
Description:
Motionto Intervene of Baltimore County, Maryland, et al under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK
2/6/2007
20070206-5045
Motion to Intervene of Chesapeake Climate Action Network under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
2/6/2007
20070208-0120
10
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Anne Arundel County. Maryland submits comments urging FERC to deny the application
in regards to building a Ing facility at Sparrows Point under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLCI MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
21612007
Accession No: 20070212-0053
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC forwards updated list of
affected landowners for the Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline under CP07-62.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
21612007
20070212-0054
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits an updated list of affected list of landowners
for the Mid-Atlantic Express Pipehne under CP07-62
Accession No:
Filed By:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT
ASSESSMENT.
Filed Date:
21712007
Accession No: 20070207-5013
Description:
Maryland Govenor's Office's Response to Mark Robinson's Jan. 11, 2007 Letter in CP0762, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
21812007
Accession No: 20070209-0086
Description:
LNG Opposition Team & Co-Cha,r of the Baltimore County Liquefied Natural Gas Task
Force submits comments re AES LNG proposal at Sparrows Point, MD under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
21812007
Accession No: 20070221-0064
Description:
Letter responding to Senator Barbara A Mikulski's letter dated 1129107 requesting to
extend the pubic comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
21812007
Accession No: 20070221-0065
Description:
Response to US Senator Benjamin L Cardin's 1/29/07 request to extend the public
comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project ,n order to assure participation by
s,,ate agencies under CP07-62 WAITING FOR SIGN PAGE aj
Filed Date:
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
21812007
Accession No: 20070221-0066
Description:
Letter responding to US Representative Elijah E Cummings' 1/29/07 request to extend
the public comment pedod for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
Accession No: 20070221-0067
Description:
Response to US Representative Wayne T Gilchrest's 1129107request to extend the
public comment per,od for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project in order to assure
participation by state agencies under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
ll
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20070221-0068
Description:
Responseto US Representative John Sarbanes' 1/29/07 request to extend the public
comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project in order to assure participation by
state agencies under CP07-62
Accession No:
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
Accession No: 20070221-0069
Descdption:
Responseto US Representative John Sarbanes' 1/29/07 request to extend the public
comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project in order to assure participation by
state agencies under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
Accession No: 20070222-0306
Descdption:
Responseto US Representative C A Dutch Ruppersberger's 1/29/07 request to extend
the public comment period for the Sparrows Point LNG Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
21912007
Accession No: 20070215-0179
Descdption:
Motionof the LNG Opposition Team to intervene regarding AES Sparrows Point LNG.
LLC's appliaction for authorization to site. construct and operated a LNG Import Terminal under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
2/10/2007
Accession No: 20070222-0196
Description:
Commentsof Jake Mohorovic expressing concerns with AES Corp's Sparrows Point
Project under CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
PIPELINECERTIFICATE DIVISION
2/12/2007
Accession No: 20070212-3000
Description:
Letter requesting Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC to submit w/in 20 days add=lionel information
~norder to develop a complete record of the proposal required by the Commission under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
2/12/2007
20070212-5008
Comments on Filing of Jake Mohorovis Indivdual under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
EXXONMOBIL GAS & POWER MARKETING COMPANY
2/12/200
20070212-5022
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CHESAPEAKEBAY YACHT CLUBS ASSOCIATION
2/12/2007
Accession No: 20070212-5027
Description:
Testimony of Chesapeake Bay Yacht Clubs Association under CP07-62, et al against
approval of the proposed LNG facilities at Sparrows Point, Baltimore, MD.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
SHELL NA LNG LLC
2/13/2007
20070213-5013
Motion of Shell NA LNG LLC to Intervene under CP07-62, et al
]2
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
STATOIL NATURAL GAS LLC
2/13/2007
20070213-5044
Motion for Leave to Intervene of Stato~l Natural Gas LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
INDIVIDUAL
2/13/2007
20070213-5054
Comments of David Conover under CP07-63 et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
2/14/2007
Accession No: 20070213-5064
Description:
Complaint of Linda Wright under CP07-62 et a] Comments on the proposed LNG
pipeline that will be built in Sparrows Point
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
OescripUon:
mile Pipeline in
INDIVIDUAL
2/14/2007
20070213-5069
Commentsof William J Willard against Proposal of AES to Build a LNG Terminal and 87
Maryland under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
2/14/2007
Accession No: 20070213-5071
Description:
Commentsof Brian Kraemer re the proposed LNG storage facility at Sparrows Point,
Maryland etc under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62. et al
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION
2/14/2007
20070214-5006
Motion To Intervene And Comments Of Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation in
Filed By:
M A R Y L A N DDEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT ASMENT
Filed Date:
2/14/200
Accession No: 20070214-5008
DeecripUon:
Motionto Intervene of Maryland Department of Natural Resources Power Plant Research
Program under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
DescdpUon:
et al.
PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKS
2/14/200
20070214-5009
Motion for Leave to Intervene and Comments of Philadelphia Gas Works under CP07-62,
Filed By:
ISG SPARROWS POINT LLC
Filed Date:
2/14/2007
Accession No: 20070214-5015
Description:
Motionfor Leave to Intervene and Request for Technical Conferernce of ISG Sparrows
Point LLC under CP07-64 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
BP ENERGY COMPANY
2/14/2007
20070214-5018
Motion to Intervene of BP Energy Company under CP07-62 et al
13
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORP., NISOURCE CORPORATE SERVICES
21141200
Acceaalon No: 20070214-5019
Descdption:
Motion to Intervene and Comments of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. under CP07-62
et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AVONDALE CITIZENS' ASSOCIATION INC
2/1412007
Accession No: 20070214-5020
Comments of Avondale Citizens' Association, Inc under CP07-62
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Description:
MARYLAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL INC
211412007
20070214-5021
Motion to Intervene of Maryland Conservation Council Inc under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
2/14/2007
20070214-5030
Motion to Intervene and Comments of Honeywell International Inc under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62, et al
TURNER STATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INCORPORATED
211412007
20070214-5046
Comment on Filing of Turner Station Development Corporation, Incorporated under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
CP07-62, et al
TURNER STATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INCORPORATED
211412007
20070214-5048
Comment on Filing of Turner Station Development Corporation, Incorporated under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Filed By:
2/14/2007
Filed Date:
Accession No: 20070216-0074
Comments of the US Army Corps of Engineers on the permit applications from AES
Descdption:
Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
COUNTY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE COUNTY
Filed Date:
211412007
Accession No: 20070308-0145
Description:
Commentsof Baltimore Councilman John Olszewski expressing opposition to the
proposal of AES to cite an LNG facility at Sparrows Point under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
MARYLANDHOUSE OF DELEGATES
Filed Date:
2/14/2007
Accession No: 20070308-0147
Description:
Commentsof Maryland Delegate Josephy J Minnick expressing opposition to the
proposed site of an an LNG facility at Sparrows Point under CP07-62
MARYLAND WATERFOWLERS ASSOCIATION
Filed By:
2/15/2007
Filed Date:
Accession No: 20070215-5020
Motion to Intervene of Maryland Waterfowlers Association under CP07-62
Descdption:
]4
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP
211512007
Accession No: 20070215-5022
Description:
Motion to Intervene Out of Time of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP under CP07-62, et
al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
2/15/2007
Accession No: 20070220-0205
Description:
Commentsof LNG Opposition Team requesting denial of permits of AES Sparrows Point
LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
G R E A T E RDUNDALK ALLIANCE
2/2012007
Accession No: 20070222-0197
Description:
Commentsof Greater Dundalk Alliance expressing concerns with the placement of the
Soarrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
CONSOLIDATEDEDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK; ORANGE AND ROCKLAND
UTILITIES, INC
Filed Date:
2/211200
Accession No: 20070221-5051
Description:
Motionof Consolidated Edison Company of New York,, et af. to Intervene Out of Time
under.CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
WEAVER'SCOVE ENERGY, LLC
2/28/2007
Accession No: 20070302-0011
Description:
Motionfor leave to intervene out of time of Weaver's Cove Energy, LLC re AES Sparrows
Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
3/1/2007
Accession No: 20070301-4009
Description:
CYNSEO's comments and complaint regarding the AES Sparrows Point & Mid-Atlantic
Express Gas Pipeline under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
3/2/2007
Accession No: 20070306-0095
Description:
Letter responding to the State of Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley's letter dated 2/7/07
re the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
31212007
Acceseion No: 20070312-0001
Description:
Mid-Atlantic Express LLC submits its responses to FERC's Data Requests issued on
2,'12/07 under CP07-62.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
31212007
Accession No: 20070312-0002
Description:
Mid-AtlanticExpress LLC submits its responses to FERC's Data Requests ~ssued on
2/12/07 under CP07~2
]5
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
MARYLAND,STATE OF
31812007
20070308-0144
Description:
Commentsof Maryland State Senator Norman R Jones on behalf of his constituents
expressing opposition to the proposed LNG plant by AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic
Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
EXTERNALAFFAIRS. OFFICE OF
3/8/2007
20070314-0256
Deecription:
Letter responding to 7th District Councilman John Olszewski's letter dated 218107 re the
Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP07-62
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF
3/8/2007
20070314-0257
Descdption:
Letter responding to Maryland Senator Norman R Stone's letter dated 218107 re the
Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
EXTERNAL AFFAIRS. OFFICE OF
31812007
20070316-0187
Letter responding to Maryland House of Delegates' letter dated 2/2/07 regarding the
Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Project under CP07-62.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Dsscdption:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGYPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
3/13/2007
20070313~,007
Description:
Minutesfrom the 3/7/07 meeting between FERC, AMEC Paragon, MDNR, ERM
regarding Sparrows Point Project - MDNR Air Quality Issuges under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
PIKESVILLECOMMUNITIES CORP
3/13/2007
20070316-0144
Description:
Pikesville Communities Corporation expresses concerns regarding the LNG Terminal
Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGYPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
311612007
20070316-3003
Description:
Letter requesting AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al to submit within 20 days. additional
enviromental information for the AES Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGYPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
3/20/2007
20070320-4003
Description:
Minutesfrom the 3/20/07 meeting between FERC, MDNR, ERM regarding Sparrows
Point Project - MDNR Air Quality Issuges under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
31201200
20070320-5023
Description:
Motionfor Leave to Answer and Answer of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and MidAtlantic Express, L L C under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
BALTIMOREGAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
]6
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
Filed Da~:
Accession No:
DescdpUon:
etal
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
3/26/2007
20070326-5061
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company under CP07-62,
Filed By:
UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, (PA)
Filed Date:
312712007
Accession NO: 20070330-0065
Upper Uwchlan Township submits an Exhibit titled "Plan for Consideration of Routing
Description:
around Huntes Ridge" dated 1110107for the Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al
UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, (PA)
3/27/2007
Accession No: 20070330-0079
Description:
Upper Uwchlan Township submits an Exhibit titled "Plan for Consideration of Routing
around Huntes Ridge" dated 1110107for the Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al. LARGE
FORMAT ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
3/27/200
Accession No: 20070807-0084
Description:
Comments of James and Marian Sweeney regarding the liquefied natural gas pipe line
proposed for Hartford County, Maryland under CP07-62 et al
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
41312007
Accession No: 20070403-4003
Description:
Letter requesting AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC to submit within 20 days, additional
information to assist in analysis of the certificate application under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT ASMENT
4/4/2007
Accession No: 20070404-5056
Description:
Follow-up to Environmental Review for AES Sparrows Point LNG Terminal Project and
Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project, Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Harford County and Cecil
County, Maryland under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070405-4012
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al. Volume IV
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070405-4013
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al. Volume II.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070405-4014
Deecdptlon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Altantic Express, LLC's CD containing its response
to FERC's 3116107 data requests under CP07-62 et al Volume III.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
]7
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070405-4018
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing GEO4
Response Electronic CPT Data to its response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Requests under
CP07-62 et al Volume I: Public Information Part 1 of 4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
JAMESTRUSZKOWSKI
41512007
20070405-5044
Comment of James Truszkowski under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0210
Descdption:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's 3/16/07
Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
Filed Date:
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0211
Description:
Responseof AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3/16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al Volume I: Part 1 of 4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0212
Description:
Responseof AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3/16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et ai Part 2 of 4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0213
Description:
Responseof AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3/16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al Part 3 of 4
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0214
Description:
Responseof AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3/16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al Part 4 of 4
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0215
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC submits Volume II of its
response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0216
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits Volume II of its
response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS
ONLY
18
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0217
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC to FERC's
3116107 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Volume III. Part 1 of 4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0218
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al response to FERC's 3116107 Environmental Data
Request issued 3/16/07 under CP07-62 et al Volume III Part 2 of 4.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0219
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data
Request issued 3116107 under CP07-62 et al Vol II. Part 3 of 4.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0220
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3i16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Volume II1: Priwleged Information Part 4 of
4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0221
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC to FERC's
3/16107 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Volume IV.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No:
20070411-0222
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC to FERC's
3/16107 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al Volume IV LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND POWER PLANT RESEARCH PROGRAM
41612007
Accession No: 20070406-5021
Description:
Informational Correspondence submitted by Maryland Power Plant Research Program
concerning Air Quality discussions under CP07-62-000, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/10/200
Accession No: 20070410-4009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's CD containing the Draft
Addendum Phase I Archaeological Investigation Report for Chester and Lancaster Counties, PA under
CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41101200
20070412-0196
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits a Draft Addendum Phase I Archaeological
Investigation Report for Cecil. Harford and Baltimore Counties. Maryland etc under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Accession No:
]9
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/10/200
Accession No: 20070412-0197
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits a Draft Addendum Phase I Archaeological
Investigation Report for Cecil, Harford and Baltimore Counties. Maryland etc under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
Accession No: 20070416-0210
Description:
Commentsof Cory Zarachowicz in opposztion to the plan for building an LNG Plant m
Sparrows Point etc under PF06-22 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
20070416-0211
Comments of Fernando Fontanez in opposition to the LNG Project under PF06-22 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN
4/1112007
Accession No: 20070416-0212
Description:
Commentsof Jeffrey Smith in opposition to the plan for building an LNG Plant in
Sparrows Point that AES is consider building under PF06-22 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN
4/1112007
Accession No: 20070416-0213
Description:
Commentsof Agustin H Diaz expressing concerns regarding the proposed placement of
the LNG Plant etc under PF06-22 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
PF06-22 et al.
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
20070416-0214
Comments of James Wills m opposition to the Sparrows Point LNG Plant etc under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN
4/1112007
Accession No: 20070416-0215
Description:
Commentsof Manuel Valerio in opposition to the Sparrows Point LNG Plant Project etc
under PF06-22 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/1112007
Accession No: 20070416-0216
Description:
Commentsof Zachary Yancura in opposition to the plan for building an LNG Plant in
Sparrows Point etc under PF06-22 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/1112007
Accession No: 20070416-0218
Description:
Commentsof Robbie Cumberland Jr expressing concerns re the LNG issue =n Sparrows
Point under PF06-22 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
4/18/200
20070418-4005
20
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its revised
Joint Application for US Army Corp of Engineers Section 404/10 Permit for the States of Maryland and
Pennsylvania under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070418-.4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing the
application submitted to the Army Corp of Engineers in response to FERC's 3116107 Environmental Data
Request, CP07-62 et al ado, adi, bpi, pro, usr and out files not loaded,
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
4/18/2007
20070418-5071
Motion to Intervene Out of T~me of Byers Commercial LP under CP07-62-000, at el.:
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0110
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC forward a copy of the
application submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16107 Environmental Data
Request under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0111
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC forward a copy of the
application submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3116107 Environmental Data
Request under CP07-62 et al Part 1 of 2,
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0112
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC forward a copy of the
application submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data
Request under CP07-62 et aL Part 2 of 2
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0113
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corps of Engineers m response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 1 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0114
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corp of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al. Part 2 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/181200
Accession No: 20070425-0115
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corp of Engineers ~n response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al, Part 2 of 5. LARGE FORMAT ONLY,
2]
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0116
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and M=d-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 EnvLronmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 3 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0117
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 4 of 5.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No:
20070425-0118
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al. Part 4 of 5 LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0119
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's revised joint application
submitted to Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 5 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0120
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's Appendix 2D Wetland
Delineation Report to its application submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07
Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al Part 1 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0121
Description:
AES Sparrows Po=nt LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's Appendix 2D Wetland
Delineation Report to its application submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07
Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al Part 2 of 5 jen
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0122
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & d Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's Appendix 2D Wetland
Delineation Report to its appl submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3116107
Environmental Data Request, CP07-62 et al. Part 3 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0123
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's Appendix 2D Wetland
Delineation Report to its application submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07
Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al, Part 4 of 5
22
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0124
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's Appendix 2D,Wetland
Delineation Report to the,r application submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's
3/16107 Environmental Data Request CP07-62 et al. Part 5 of 5.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0125
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's rev,sed joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3116107 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0126
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et aL LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0127
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0128
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's rev,sed joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers ~n response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/181200
Accession No: 20070425-0129
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al, LARGE FORMATS ONLY,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0130
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Eng,neers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0131
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMATS ONLY
23
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Acceesion No: 20070425-0132
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed Date:
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0133
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16107 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0134
Descdptlon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al revised joint application submitted to the Army
Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al.
LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/19/200
Accession No: 20070419-4016
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its revised
figures, which contain updated topographic maps of possible route variations under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/191200
Accession No: 20070424-0216
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits revised Figures
10 6 4-1 through 10 6 4-14 containing updated topographic maps of possible route variations under
CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41191200
20070424-0217
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits revised Figures
106 4-1 through 10 6 4-14 containing updated topographic maps of possible route variations under
CP07-62 et aL
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION, FERC
4/20/2007
20070420-3038
Notice of Technical Conference scheduled for 5/8/07 re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LCC
Description:
under CP07-62
Federal RegleterCitetion: 72 FR 20845 Date 4/2612007
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/23/200
Accession No: 20070423-4044
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its response
to FERC's 4/3/07 Cryogenic Information Request under CP07~2 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
24
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
41231200
20070501-0076
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
4/3/07 Cryogenic Information Request under CP07-62 et al,
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/23/200
Accession No: 20070501-0077
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
4/3/07 Cryogenic Information Request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/23/200
Accession No: 20070501-0078
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
4/3/07 Cryogenic Information Request under CP07~2 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/26/200
Accession No: 20070510-0002
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submit the proposed 2007
survey schedule and protocols for rare, threatened and endangered species under CP07-62 et el.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
5/1/2007
Accession No: 20070504-0223
DescdpUon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits responses to
FERC's Environmental Data Requests issued on 3/16/07 etc under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
5/1/2007
Accession No: 20070504-0224
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits three tables in response to US Coast Guard
Request 3 ee which were inadvertently omitted from its 4/5/07 filing under CP07-52 et al.
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
5/2/2007
20070502-4007
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express LLC's CD contaimng its
Environmental Data Response: Supplemental Geology Response under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070509-0236
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070509-0237
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et el. Part 1 of 3
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
25
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
51212007
20070509-0238
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al Part 2 of 3.
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070509-0239
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al Part 3 of 3.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
51212007
Accession No: 20070509-0240
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16107 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al Part 1 of 2
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070509-0241
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al. Part 2 of 2
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
ENERGY PROJECTS. OFFICE OF
5/7/2007
20070507-4006
Summary of the 517107 site visit re the AES Sparrow's Point LNG under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
5/14/2007
20070521-0187
Comments of Sean Guarnera expressing concerns re the LNG Plant under CP07-62
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed By:
5/16/200
Filed Date:
Accession No: 20070518-0211
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC submits the results of a
Description:
bald eagle nest occupancy survey conducted on 4/26/07 under CP07-62 et al.
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
51161200
20070518-0212
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits the results of a
bald eagle nest occupancy survey conducted 4126107 for the proposed Mid-Atlantic Express Project under
CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
51211200
Accession No: 20070523-0120
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits Table 8.2 2-1 (Attachment LURA6c) =n
response to the Land, Use, Recreat=onand Aesthetic Request 6 under CP07-62 et al
26
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLANDDEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
512312007
Accession No: 20070525-0006
Description:
Maryland Department of the Environment's correspondence re joint Federal/State
application for the alteration of any floodplain, waterway, tidal or nontidal wetland in Maryland re AES
Sparrows Point LNG et al, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLANDDEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
512312007
Accession No: 20070525-0007
Description:
Commentsof the Maryland Department of the Environmet regarding the proposed AES
Sparrows Point LNG facilty under CP07-62
Flied By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
5/31/200
Accession No: 20070613-0083
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits responses to Maryland Department of
Environment data request issued on 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC; AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
51311200
Accession No: 20070613-0084
Descdptlon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits responses to Maryland Department of
Environment data request issued on 517107 under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMAT ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC, AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
51311200
Accession No: 20070613-0085
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits responses to Maryland Department of
Environment data request ~ssued on 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMATS ONLY,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC: AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
51311200
Accession No: 20070613-0086
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al subm=ts responses to Maryland Department of
Environment data request issued on 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMAT ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
51311200
Accession No: 20070613-0087
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submds its responses to the Maryland Department
of the Environment data request issued 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
51311200
Accession No: 20070613-0089
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their responses to
Maryland Department of Environment's 5/7/07 data request under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express LLC
61412007
Accession No: 20070606-0161
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits the consultant's proposed modeling
methodology for vapor dispersion calculations under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
FERC
27
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
615/2007
20070605-4010
Description:
Minutesfrom the 615107 InterAgency Meehng on Dredging/Dredged Material Disposal
conducted in Baltimore, MD re AES Sparrows Point LNG under CP07-62 et al,
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
61612007
Accession No: 20070607-0263
Description:
AES Sparrows Point, LLC et al submits the input and output information from a
subsequent re-run of the source program under CP07-62 et al
FERC
611212007
20070612-4000
Minutes of the 6/5/07 meeting re the Sparrows Point Project - MDNR Air Quality Issues
under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
61141200
Accession No: 20070618-0274
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al response to the issues and/or questions raised in
the minutes from the meeting on Dredging / Dredged Material Disposal with FERC, US Army Corps of
Engineers et al under CP07-62
issued By:
Filed Date:
ENERGYPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
6/1812007
Accession No: 20070618-3004
Description:
Letter to AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC discussing the Source Strength and Vapor
Dispersion Methodology under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
6/19/2007
Accession No: 20070622-0048
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC submits copy of letter responding to the US Coast
Guard's 4/41407 reuqest for new & supplemental info to amend the Waterway Suitability Assessment for
the AES project, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
6/25/2007
Accession No: 20070627-0144
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al submits its supplemental response to FERC's
Environmental Data Request issued 3116107 concerning Vehicular Traffic etc under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
612812007
Accession No: 20070628-4003
Description:
Mid-AtlanticExpress, LLC's CD containing Exhibits K through P to its application for
authorization to site, construct and operate an 88-mile pipeline to transport natural gas from the liquefied
natural gas import terminal proposed by AES, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC
EXPRESS LLC
612812007
Accession No: 20070703-0031
Description:
Mid-AtlanticExpress LLC submits Exhibits K through P of the Application submitted on
1/8/07 for a authorized certificate under CP07-62 et al
2,g
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
61291200
Accession No: 20070703-0231
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al repeats its certfication in connection with its FERC
applications and with respect to the proposed LNG Terminal and Pipeline Facilities state's coastal zone
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
7/2/2007
Accession No: 20070702`4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing Attachment B & D of response to
issues et al by FERC et al during the 6/5/07 meeting re the resolution of Air Quality issues btw FERC &
MD Dept of Natural Resources, CP07-62 et al.(pro & bpi not loaded)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
71212007
Accession No: 20070705-0261
DescdpUon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC responds to issues and/or
quest;ons raised by FERC et al during the 6/5/07 meeting re the resolution of A=r Quality issues between
FERC & MD Dept of Natural Resources, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
BYERS COMMERCIAL LP
7/512007
20070705-5063
Rerouting Proposal of Byers Commercial LP under CP07-62-000 et al
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
7/912007
Accession No: 20070712-0003
Descdptlon:
US Army Corps of Engineers' response to AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's permit
application under CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
7/11/2007
Accession No: 20070711-3026
Description:
Letter requesting AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid Atlantic Express, LLC to provide
within 20 days environmental information to assist FERC in their analysis re the Sparrows Point Project
under CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING REVIEW
7/11/2007
Accession No: 20070716-0195
Description:
Email dated 7/11/07 forwarding a letter to AES from Maryland Department of the
Environment re the AES Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
7/24/200
Accession No: 20070724-4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD that contains their
response to to the US Army Corps of Engineers' 7/3/07 data request under CP07--62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
7/24/2007
Accession No: 20070724-4008
Descdptlon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' July 2007 Data Request under CP07-62 et al. Volume 1,
29
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC
712412007
200707244009
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' July 2007 Data Request under CP07-62 et al Volume 3
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
7/24/2007
Accession No: 20070724-4010
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' July 2007 Data Request under CP07-62 et al Volume 4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
71241200
Accession No: 20070730-0101
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC submits their response to
the US Army Corps of Engineers' 7/3/07 data request under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
71241200
Accession No: 20070730-0102
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their response to
to the US Army Corps of Engineers' 7/3/07 data request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
7/24/200
Accession No: 20070730-0103
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and M~d-Atlantic Express, LLC submits copies of their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' data request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC: AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
71241200
Accession No: 20070730-0104
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits copies of their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' data request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES
712512007
Accession No: 20070807-0092
Description:
US House of Representative CA Dutch Ruppersberger re the federal court's ruling that a
LNG facility at Sparrwos Point, MD will violate the state's protected environmental sensitive areas of the
Chesapeak Bay under CP07-62
Issued By:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
7/31/2007
Accession No: 200707314007
Description:
Record of 7131107 InterAgency Conference call between FERC, U S Army Corps of
Engineers. & the U S Environmental Protection Agency re respective data deficiencies in the various
applications etc under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
71311200
Accession No: 200707314008
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's CD containing Volume 1 to
its July 2007 Environmental Data Response under CP07-62 et al
30
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
7/31/200
Accession No: 20070731-4009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing Volume 2 to
its July 2007 Environmental Data Response under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
71311200
Accession No: 20070731-4010
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing Volume 3 to
its July 2007 Environmental Data Response under CP07-62 et al.
Filed D a t e :
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
7/31/200
Accession No: 20070731-4011
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing Volume 4 to
its July 2007 Environmental Data Response under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
71311200
Accession No: 20070809-0107
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their response to
US Army Corps of Engineers's data request under CP07-62 et al,
Issued By:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
81112007
Accession No: 20070801-4039
Description:
Minutes from the 8/1/07 meeting with AES re additional sediment sampling program &
other dredged material disposal issues - The 404 permit appl for the AES Sparrows Point LNG Terminal &
Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline (Sparrows Point Proj), CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Filed By:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
Filed D a t e :
81212007
Accession No: 20070802-5037
Description:
Filingof MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, Federal Consistency
Determination pursuant to CZMA, under CP07-62, et al.:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES OCEAN EXPRESS LLC
8/612007
Accession No: 20070806-5032
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's Response to question raised during the August 1, 2007
technical conference. Under CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
8/8/2007
20070809-0174
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits a Notice of Appeal under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
8/9/2007
Accession No: 20070813-0144
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits the resuffs of the analysis performed by
LPES, Inc to determine the level of service of the 1-695 Exit 43 on-ramps and off-ramps under CP07-62 et
al.
3l
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
81101200
Accession No: 20070814-0177
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al submits the "Sparrows Point LNG - LNG Vapor
Dispersion from Troughs" report under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC. MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
81101200
AccessionNo: 20070814-0178
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits the "Sparrows
Point LNG - LNG Vapor Dispersion from Troughs" report, in response to FERC's 3/16/07 environmental
data request under CP07-62
Issued By:
ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING REVIEW; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT
Filed Date:
8/27/200
Accession No: 20070830-0037
Description:
Memo dated 8/23/07 providing Maryland Dept of the Environment's letter re AEs
Sparrowd Point LNG's et al dredging and pipeline construction to be placed in public record under CP0762
Filed By:
ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING REVIEW. MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT
Filed Date:
81271200
Accession No: 20070830-0037
Description:
Memo dated 8123107 providing Maryland Dept of the Environment's letter re AEs
Sparrowd Point LNG's et al dredging and pipeline construction to be placed in public record under CP0762
Filed By:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; OFFICE OF ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Filed Date:
81281200
Accession No: 20070828-5004
Description:
Response of Maryland Department of the Environment to AES submittals under CFRA,
re: CP07-62-000, et al.:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91412007
Accession NO: 20070904-4042
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and M,d-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
responses to the Maryland Department of Environment Data Request issued 8/15/07 under CP07-62 et
al, (Volume 2)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
91412007
Accession No: 20070904-4043
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
responses to the Maryland Department of Environment Data Request issued 8/15/07 under CP07-62 et
al (Volume 1)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91412007
Accession No: 20070910-0173
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their responses to
the Maryland Department of Environment Data Request issued 8/15107 under CP07-62 et al.
32
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/412007
Accession No: 20070910-0174
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their responses to
the Maryland Department of Environment Data Request issued 8/15/07 under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/712007
20070907-4013
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing ~ts brief and appendix under CP07-
62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
9/712007
Accession No: 20070913-0045
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits a Brief and
Appendix under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
9/712007
Accession No: 20070913-0046
Description:
Appendix to inihal brief on appeal of AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express
LLC re Maryland Department of Environment under CP07-62 et al I Volume 2 of 3. Part 1 of 2
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express LLC
9/712007
Accession No: 20070913-0047
Description:
Appendix to initial brief on appeal of AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic
Express LLC vs Maryland Department of Environment under CP07-62 et al Vol 1 of 3; Part 2 of 2,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
9/7/2007
Accession No: 20070913-0048
Description:
Appendix to initial brief on appeal of AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express
LLC re Maryland Department of Environment under CP07-62 et al.I Volume 2 of 3
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/7/2007
Accession No: 20070913-0049
DescdpUon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits a Brief and
Appendix under CP07-62 et al
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
9/11/2007
20070911-5003
Comment on AES July 2007 response to FERC concerning air quality Filing of PPRPMaryland DNR under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdptlon:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
9/24/2007
20070926-0021
Maryland Department of the Environment submits their response to FERC's letter re the
proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG Facdity under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
33
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
INDEX OF DOCUMENTS & MATERIALS
Maryland Department of Environment, Water Quality Certification
(Copied from Federal Energy Regulator)' Commission Docket Sheet, Docket CP07-62
htt p://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/docket_sheet.asp)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal under
CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4007
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resourca Report 1
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094008
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 contaimng its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 10.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 11.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094010
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 12
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094011
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mport terminal under
CP07-62 E \Env=ronmental Report\Resource Report 13
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094012
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal under
CP07-62. E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 2
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
20070109-4013
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's C£) 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E\Environmental Report\Resource Report 3.
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4014
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 5.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4015
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing =ts Volumes I and to the
application for authorization to s=te, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62. E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 6.
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4016
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing ~ts Volumes I and to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Environmental Report\Resource Report 7.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4017
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E \Environmental Report\Resource Report 8
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4018
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 9 (zip files of dpi, ado, pro not loaded)
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4019
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E \Exhibits\Exhibit A.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109--4020
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit B
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
2
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4021
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit C
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
Filed Date:
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4022
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit D
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4023
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal under
CP07-62. E:\Exhibits\Exhlbit E.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4024
Descdptlon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas tmport terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhiblts\Exhibit E-1
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
Filed Date:
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4025
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal under
CP07-62 , E:\Exhibits\Exhibit F.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
Filed Date:
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4026
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit G
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4027
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing its Volumes I and II to the
application for authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas tmport terminal under
CP07-62 E:\Exhibits\Exhibit H
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
authorization to
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
11912007
20070109-4028
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 2 of 4 containing Volume III to the application for
site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
Accession No:
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20070109-4029
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4030
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal, E:\Enwronmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 10
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094031
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 2
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094032
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal. E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 3
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4033
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the apphcation for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094034
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorizat=on to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 6
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094035
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas Lmport terminal E\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 7
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 200701094036
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 8
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC
1/9/2007
20070109-4037
4
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Reports\Environmental Report\Resource Report 9
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4038
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 3 of 4 containing Volume IV to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Exhibits
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4039
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 11.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4040
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13\1 lx17 drawings
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4041
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
a,~thorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =report terminal. E:\Enwronmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix A - Facility Description
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4042
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13Vkppendix B - ProJect Schedule
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4043
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authonzation to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mport terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix C - Basis Of Design
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4044
Descdptlon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~&,ppendixD - Codes and Standards
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
20070109-4045
5
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Jkppendzx E - Permits or Approvals
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Acceselon No: 20070109-4046
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the appl for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix F - Demonstration of Code Compliance
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Acce,,=sion No: 20070109-4047
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mportterminal E \Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix G - HAZOP Review
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Acceselon No: 20070109-4048
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorizahon to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mportterminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~ppendix H - Management of Change and Repo
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109.4049
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the apphcat,on for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix I - Seismic Design
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109.4050
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mport terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13Vkppendix J - Soft Characteristics
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
Filed Date:
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4051
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas =mportterminal E \Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~ppendix K - Marine Systems
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4052
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas ~mport terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix L - LNG Tank Information
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
6
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
11912007
20070109-4053
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendrx M - Equipment Information
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4054
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal, E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix N - Instrumentat=on
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4055
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~ppendix O - Electrical
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4056
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix P - Fire Protection
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4057
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Vot V to the appl for authorization
to site, construct, & operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Enwronmental Report\Resource
Report 13~Appendix Q - Thermal Radiation and Vapor Dispersion
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4058
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix R - Design Studies
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4059
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a hquefied natural gas import terminal E\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix S - Shutoff Valves
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4060
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
a,Jthorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefed natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~Appendix T - Project Specifications
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
?
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
Filed Date:
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4061
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natura~ gas import terminal, E~Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13~JkppendixU - Project Drawings
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4062
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13\Data Request Response Matrix
Flied By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
11912007
Accession No: 20070109-4063
Deecdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 4 of 4 containing Volume V to the application for
authorization to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal. E:\Environmental
Report\Resource Report 13\Resource Report 13 Text
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
1/9/2007
Accession No: 20070109-4068
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD 1 of 4 containing the Documents to the application
for authorization to site. construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas import terminal under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed D a t e :
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
1/11/2007
Accession No: 20070111-3014
Description:
Letter informing the Governor of Maryland that AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC filed its
application with the Commission on 118107under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
1/16/200
Accession No: 20070116-4021
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD 1 of 3 containing its
Maryland Coastal Facilities Review Act application filed with the Maryland Dept of Environment on 1/8/07
under CP07-62 et al (bpi, ado, adi, pro. et al files not loaded)
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
11161200
Accession No: 20070116-4022
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's CD 2 of 3 containing its
Maryland Coastal Facilities Review Act application filed w~th the Maryland Dept of Environment on 1/8/07
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
1/16/200
Accession No: 20070116-4023
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlant,c Express, LLC's CD 3 of 3 containing its
Maryland Coastal Facilities Review Act application filed w=th the Maryland Dept of Environment on 1/8/07
under CP07-62 et al
Flied By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
11171200
Accession No: 20070119-0095
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their December
2006 monthly status report for the Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62
Flied By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
1/18/200
20070122-0059
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submit the amended
Exhibit J to application under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed D a t e :
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION
1/23/2007
Accession No: 20070123-3022
Description:
Notice of AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's et al 1/8/07 filing of application for
authorization to site, construct and operate a liquefied natural gas receiving terminal and associated
facilities in Baltimore County, MD under CP07-62 et al
Federal Register Citation: 72 FR 4250 Date: 1/30/2007
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION
1/25/2007
20070125-3004
Description:
Errata Notice to the Notice issued on 1/23/07 re AES Sparrow Point LNG LLC and MidAUantic Express LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
SENATE, UNITED STATES; HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES
1/30/2007
Accession No: 20070130-4002
Description:
US Senator Barbara A Mikulski et al requests that FERC extend the public comment
period relating to consideration of a proposed Liquid Natural Gas facility at Sparrows Point in Baltimore,
MD under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
MARYLAND WATERFOWLERS ASSOCIATION
1/30/2007
20070130-5047
Motion to Intervene of Maryland Waterfowlers Association under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
1/31/2007
20070130-5078
Comment on filing of AES Sparrows Pomt LNG, LLC under CP07-62
Issued By:
ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING REVIEW
Filed Date:
113112007
20070131-4029
Description:
Record of 1/31/07 Post-Filing Meeting between FERC, AES, Haley & Aldrich, and
Sparrow's Point Shipyard regarding AES Sparrow's Point LNG Project under CP07-62
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
MARYLAND WATERFOWLERS ASSOCIATION
2/1/2007
20070201-5016
Amended Motion to Intervene of Maryland Waterfowlers Assoc~atlon under CP07-62, et
aL
Filed By:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT ASMENT
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT ASMENT
Filed Date:
2/1/2007
Accession No: 20070201-5042
9
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Request for Extension of Time for 2 weeks of Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Power Plant Research Program under CP07-62
Filed By:
CONGRESSOF THE UNITED STATES; SENATE, UNITED STATES
Filed Date:
2/2/2007
Accession No: 20070221-0089
Description:
US Senator Barbara A Mikulski et al requests for FERC to extend the public comment
period relating to consideration of a proposed Liquid Natural Gas Facility at Sparrows Point in Baltimore,
Maryland under CP07-62
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
Filed Date:
2/5/2007
Accession No: 20070206-0140
Descdption:
Commentsof James Lynch expressing concerns regarding the LNG Terminal being built
in his neighborhood under CP07-62 et al
Flied By:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
Filed Date:
2/5/2007
Accession No: 20070213-0079
Description:
Motionof the LNG Opposition Team to Intervene in the proceeding involving AES
Sparrows Point LNG LLC under CP07-62
Issued By:
SECRETARYOF THE COMMISSION
Filed Date:
2/6/2007
Accession No: 20070206-3046
Description:
Noticedenying request of the Power Plant Research Program of the Maryland
Department of Natural Resources et al for a two-week extension of time to file a state advisory report re
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's LNG terminal, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
21612007
Accession No: 20070206-4007
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG et al CD containing an updated list of affected landowners for
the Mid-Atlanbc Express Pipeline under CP07-62
Filed By:
PENNSYLVANIADEPT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Filed Date:
2/6/2007
Accession NO: 20070206-4013
Descdption:
PennsylvaniaDepartment of Conservation and Natural Resources respond to Northern
Ecological Associates, Inc's request about Pennsylvania Natural Diversity Inventory etc re the AES
Sparrows Point LNG Terminal Project. CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
BALTIMORECOUNTY (MD)
BALTIMORE COUNTY. MARYLAND
Filed Date:
21612007
Accession No: 20070206-5018
Description:
Motionto Intervene of Baltimore County. Maryland. et al under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK
2/6/2007
20070206-5045
Motion to Intervene of Chesapeake Climate Action Network under CP07-62
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY
2/6/2007
Accession No: 20070208-0120
Filed By:
Filed Date:
]0
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Anne Arundel County, Maryland submits comments urging FERC to deny the application
in regards to building a Ing facility at Sparrows Point under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
21612007
Accession No: 20070212-0053
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC forwards updated list of
affected landowners for the Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
21612007
Accession No: 20070212-0054
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits an updated list of affected list of landowners
for the Mid-Atlantic Express Pipehne under CP07-62
Filed By:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT
ASSESSMENT
Filed Date:
21712007
Accession No: 20070207-5013
Description:
Maryland Govenor's Office's Response to Mark Robinson's Jan. 11, 2007 Letter in CP0762, et al
Filed By:
Flied Date:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
2/8/2007
Accession No: 20070209-0086
Description:
LNG Opposition Team & Co-Chair of the Baltimore County Liquefied Natural Gas Task
Force submits comments re AES LNG proposal at Sparrows Point, MD under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
Accession No: 2007022%0064
Description:
Letter responding to Senator Barbara A Mikulski's letter dated 1/29/07 requesting to
extend the pubic comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
21812007
Accession No: 20070221-0065
Description:
Response to US Senator Benjamin L Cardin's 1129107 request to extend the public
comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project in order to assure participation by
state agencies under CP07-62 WAITING FOR SIGN PAGE aj
Filed Date:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
Accession No: 20070221-0066
Description:
Letter responding to US Representative Ehjah E Cummings' 1129107 request to extend
the public comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
Accession No: 20070221-0067
Description:
Response to US Representative Wayne T Gilchrest's 1/29/07 request to extend the
public comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project in order to assure
participation by state agencies under CP07-62
Filed D a t e :
Issued By:
Filed Date:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
]]
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
2007022%0068
Description:
Response to US Representative John Sarbanes' 1/29/07 request to extend the public
comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project in order to assure participation by
state agencies under CP07-62
Accession No:
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
Accession No: 20070221-0069
Description:
Response to US Representative John Sarbanes' 1/29/07 request to extend the public
comment period for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project in order to assure participation by
state agencies under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
2/8/2007
Accession No: 20070222-0306
Description;
Response 1o US Representative C A Dutch Ruppersberger's 1/29/07 request to extend
the public comment period for the Sparrows Point LNG Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Flied By:
Filed Date:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
2/9/2007
Accession No: 20070215-0179
Description:
Motion of the LNG Opposition Team to intervene regarding AES Sparrows Point LNG,
LLC's appliaction for authorization to site, construct and operated a LNG Import Terminal under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
2/10/2007
Accession No: 20070222-0196
Description:
Comments of Jake MohorovJc expressing concerns with AES Corp's Sparrows Point
Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
PIPELINE CERTIFICATE DIVISION
2/12/2007
Accession No: 20070212-3000
Description:
Letter requesting Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to submit w/in 20 days additional information
in order to develop a complete record of the proposal required by the Commission under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
2/12/2007
Accession No: 20070212-5008
Description:
Comments on Filing of Jake Mohorovis Indivdual under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
EXXONMOBIL GAS & POWER MARKETING COMPANY
2/12/200
20070212-5022
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CHESAPEAKE BAY YACHT CLUBS ASSOCIATION
2/12/2007
Accession No: 20070212-5027
Description:
Testimony of Chesapeake Bay Yacht Clubs Association under CP07-62, et al against
approval of the proposed LNG facihties at Sparrows Point, Baltimore, MD.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
SHELL NA LNG LLC
2/13/2007
20070213-5013
Motion of Shell NA LNG LLC to Intervene under CP07-62, et al
]2
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
STATOIL NATURAL GAS LLC
2/13/2007
20070213-5044
Motion for Leave to Intervene of Stato,I Natural Gas LLC under CP07-62. et al.
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
2/13/2007
Accession NO: 20070213-5054
Description:
Comments of David Conover under CP07-63, et al.
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
2/14/2007
Accession No: 20070213-5064
Description:
Complaint of Linda Wright under CP07-62 et al. Comments on the proposed LNG
pipeline that will be built in Sparrows Point.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
mile Pipeline in
INDIVIDUAL
2/1412007
20070213-5069
Comments of William J Willard against Proposal of AES to Build a LNG Terminal and 87
Maryland under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
2/14/2007
Accession No: 20070213-5071
Description:
Commentsof Brian Kraemer re the proposed LNG storage facility at Sparrows Point.
Maryland etc under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62. et al
TRANSCONTINENTAL GAS PIPE LINE CORPORATION
2/14/2007
20070214-5006
Motion To Intervene And Comments Of Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation in
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT ASMENT.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
2/14/200
Accession No: 20070214-5008
Motion to Intervene of Maryland Department of Natural Resources Power Plant Research
Description:
Program under CP07-62. et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
et al
PHILADELPHIA GAS WORKS
2/14/200
20070214-5009
Motion for Leave to Intervene and Comments of Philadelphia Gas Works under CP07-62.
Filed By:
ISG SPARROWS POINT LLC
Filed Date:
2/1412007
Accession No: 20070214-5015
Description:
Motionfor Leave to Intervene and Request for Technical Conferernce of ISG Sparrows
Point LLC under CP07-64 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
BP ENERGY COMPANY
2/14/2007
20070214-5018
Motion to Intervene of BP Energy Company under CP07-62, et al.
13
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
et al
COLUMBIA GAS TRANSMISSION CORP,; NISOURCE CORPORATE SERVICES
2/14/200
20070214-5019
Motion to Intervene and Comments of Columbia Gas Transmission Corp under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AVONDALE CITIZENS' ASSOCIATION. INC
2/14/2007
20070214-5020
Comments of Avondale Citizens' Association, Inc. under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
MARYLAND CONSERVATION COUNCIL, INC
2/1412007
20070214-5021
Motion to Intervene of Maryland Conservation Council, Inc. under CP07-62 et a[
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
2/14/2007
20070214-5030
Mohon to Intervene and Comments of Honeywell International Inc under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62, et al
TURNER STATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INCORPORATED
2/14/2007
20070214-5046
Comment on Filing of Turner Station Development Corporation, Incorporated under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62, et al
TURNER STATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, INCORPORATED
2/14/2007
20070214-5048
Comment on Filing of Turner Station Development Corporation. Incorporated under
Filed By:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Filed Date:
2/1412007
Accession No: 20070216-0074
Description:
Commentsof the US Army Corps of Engineers on the permit applications from AES
Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
COUNTY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE COUNTY
Filed Date:
2/14/2007
Accession No: 20070308-0145
Description:
Commentsof Baltimore Councilman John Olszewski expressing opposition to the
proposal of AES to cite an LNG facility at Sparrows Point under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
MARYLANDHOUSE OF DELEGATES
Filed Date:
2/14/2007
Accession No: 20070308-0147
Description:
Commentsof Maryland Delegate Josephy J Minnick expressing opposition to the
proposed site of an an LNG facility at Sparrows Point under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND
WATERFOWLERS ASSOCIATION
2/15/2007
Acceseion Ne: 20070215-5020
Description:
Motionto Intervene of Maryland Waterfowlers Association under CP07-62
14
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
al.
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
TEXAS EASTERN TRANSMISSION, LP
2/15/2007
20070215-5022
Motion to Intervene Out of Time of Texas Eastern Transmission, LP under CP07-62, et
Filed By:
Filed Date:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
2/1512007
Accession No: 20070220-0205
Description:
Commentsof LNG Opposition Team requesbng denial of permits of AES Sparrows Point
LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
G R E A T E RDUNDALK ALLIANCE
212012007
Accession No: 20070222-0197
Description:
Comments of Greater Dundalk Alliance expressing concerns with the placement of the
Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
CONSOLIDATED
EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK: ORANGE AND ROCKLAND
UTILITIES, INC
Fileri Date:
2/21/200
Accession No: 20070221-5051
Description:
Motionof Consolidated Edison Company of New York., et al, to Intervene Out of Time
u'lder CP07-62, et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
WEAVER'SCOVE ENERGY. LLC
2/28/2007
Accession No:
20070302-0011
Descdptlon:
Motionfor leave to intervene out of time of Weaver's Cove Energy, LLC re AES Sparrows
Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
31112007
Accession No: 20070301-4009
Descdption:
CYNSEO's comments and complaint regarding the AES Sparrows Point & Mtd-Atlantic
Express Gas Pipehne under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
3/2/2007
Accession No: 20070306-0095
Descdptlon:
Letter responding to the State of Maryland Governor Martin O'Malley's letter dated 2/7/07
re the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
31212007
Accession No: 20070312-0001
Description:
Mid-AtlanticExpress LLC submits its responses to FERC's Data Requests issued on
2/12/07 under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
31212007
Accession No: 20070312-0002
Description:
Mid-AtlanticExpress LLC submits its responses to FERC's Data Requests issued on
2/12107 under CP07-62
15
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND,STATE OF
3/8/2007
Accession No: 20070308-0144
Description:
Commentsof Maryland State Senator Norman R Jones on behalf of his constituents
expressing opposition to the proposed LNG plant by AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic
Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
EXTERNALAFFAIRS. OFFICE OF
31812007
Accession No: 20070314-0256
Description:
Letter responding to 7th District Councilman John Olszewski's letter dated 2/8/07 re the
Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
EXTERNALAFFAIRS. OFFICE OF
3/8/2007
Accession No: 20070314-0257
Description:
Letter responding to Maryland Senator Norman R Stone's letter dated 2/8/07 re the
Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
EXTERNALAFFAIRS, OFFICE OF
3/8/2007
Accession No: 20070316-0187
Description:
Letterresponding to Maryland House of Delegates' letter dated 2/2/07 regarding the
Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGYPROJECTS. OFFICE OF
3/13/2007
20070313-4007
Description:
Minutesfrom the 3/7/07 meeting between FERC, AMEC Paragon. MDNR. ERM
regarding Sparrows Point Project - MDNR Air Quality Issuges under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
PIKESVILLECOMMUNITIES CORP
3/13/2007
Accession No: 20070316-0144
Description:
P=kesvilleCommumties Corporation expresses concerns regarding the LNG Terminal
Project under CP07-62 et aL
Issued By:
E N E R G YPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
3/16/2007
Accession No: 20070316-3003
Description:
Letterrequesting AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al to submit within 20 days. additional
enviromental information for the AES Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Issued By:
ENERGYPROJECTS. OFFICE OF
3/20/2007
Accession No: 20070320-4003
Description:
Minutesfrom the 3/20/07 meeting between FERC, MDNR, ERM regarding Sparrows
Point Project - MDNR Air Quality Issuges under CP07-62 et al.
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
3/20/200
Accession No: 20070320-5023
Description:
Motionfor Leave to Answer and Answer of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and MidAtlantic Express, L.LC. under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
BALTIMOREGAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
16
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
3/26/2007
20070326-5061
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Baltimore Gas and Electric Company under CP07-62,
et al
UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, (PA)
3/27/2007
20070330-0065
Upper Uwchlan Township submits an Exhibit titled "Plan for Consideration of Routing
Description:
around Huntes Ridge" dated 1/10/07 for the Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, (PA)
3/27/2007
Accession No: 20070330-0079
Description:
Upper Uwchlan Township submits an Exhibit titled "Plan for Consideration of Routing
around Huntes Ridge" dated 1/10/07 for the Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al LARGE
FORMAT ONLY
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
3/27/200
Accession No: 20070807-0084
DescdpUon:
Comments of James and Marian Sweeney regarding the liquefied natural gas pipe line
proposed for Hartford County, Maryland under CP07-62 et al
ENERGY PROJECTS. OFFICE OF
4/3/2007
Accession No: 20070403-4003
Description:
Letter requesting AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC to submit within 20 days, additional
information to assist in analysis of the certificate application under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES POWER PLANT ASMENT,
4/4/2007
Accession No: 20070404-5056
Description:
Follow-up to Environmental Review for AES Sparrows Point LNG Terminal Project and
Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project, Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Harford County and Cecil
County, Maryland under CP07-62, et at
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070405-4012
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing thetr
response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al. Volume IV.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070405-4013
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's CD containing their
response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al. Volume II
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070405-4014
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC & Mid-Altantic Express, LLC's CD containing ~ts response
to FERC's 3116107 data requests under CP07-62 et al. Volume III.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
]7
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
4/5/2007
20070405-4018
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing GEO4
Response Electronic CPT Data to its response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Requests under
CP07-62 et al Volume I: Public Information. Part 1 of 4,
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Da~:
Accession No:
Descdpbon:
JAMESTRUSZKOWSKI
4/5/2007
20070405-5044
Comment of James Truszkowski under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0210
Deecdption:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's 3/16107
Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0211
Description:
Responseof AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3116107 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Volume I: Part 1 of 4.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
4/512007
Accession No: 20070411-0212
Description:
Responseof AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlanhc Express, LLC to FERC's
3/16107 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Part 2 of 4.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0213
Description:
Responseof AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3116107 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Part 3 of 4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0214
Description:
Responseof AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3/16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al Part 4 of 4.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC. MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0215
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits Volume II of its
response to FERC's 3/16107 Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0216
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and M=d-Atlantic Express, LLC submits Volume II of its
response to FERC's 3/16/07 Env=ronmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS
ONLY
]8
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0217
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3J16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Volume Ill, Part 1 of 4.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0218
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data
Request issued 3/16/07 under CP07-62 et al. Volume III. Part 2 of 4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0219
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al response to FERC's 3116107 Environmental Data
Request issued 3116107 under CP07-62 et al. Vol II. Part 3 of 4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41512007
Accession No: 20070411-0220
DeacripUon:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3"16107 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al Volume III; Privileged Information, Part 4 of
4
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/5/2007
Accession No: 20070411-0221
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3/16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Volume IV.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41512007
20070411-0222
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
3,'16/07 Environmental Data Requests under CP07-62 et al. Volume IV. LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Accession No:
MARYLAND POWER PLANT RESEARCH PROGRAM
41612007
20070406-5021
Description:
Informational Correspondence submitted by Maryland Power Plant Research Program
concerning Air Quality discussions under CP07-62-000, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41101200
Accession No: 20070410-4009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's CD containing the Draft
Addendum Phase I Archaeological Investigation Report for Chester and Lancaster Counties, PA under
CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41101200
Accession No: 20070412-0196
Deecription:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits a Draft Addendum Phase I Archaeological
Investigation Report for Cecil, Harford and Baltimore Counties. Maryland etc under CP07-62 et al
]9
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
41101200
Accession No: 20070412-0197
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits a Draft Addendum Phase I Archaeological
Investigation Report for Cecil, Harford and Baltimore Counties. Maryland etc under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
Accession No: 20070416-0210
Description:
Commentsof Cory Zarachowicz in opposition to the plan for building an LNG Plant in
Sparrows Point etc under PF06-22 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
Accession No: 20070416-0211
Description:
Commentsof Femando Fontanez in opposition to the LNG Project under PF06-22 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
Accession No: 20070416-0212
Description:
Commentsof Jeffrey Smith in opposition to the plan for budding an LNG Plant in
Sparrows Point that AES is consider building under PF06-22 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
Accession No: 20070416-0213
Description:
Commentsof Agustin H Diaz expressing concerns regarding the proposed placement of
the LNG Plant etc under PF06-22 et aL
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
Accession No: 20070416-0214
Comments of James Wills in oppos=tion to the Sparrows Point LNG Plant etc under
Description:
PF06-22 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
20070416-0215
Comments of Manuel Valerio in opposibon to the Sparrows Point LNG Plant Project etc
Description:
under PF06-22 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
Accession No: 20070416-0216
Description:
Commentsof Zachary Yancura in opposition to the plan for building an LNG Plant in
Sparrows Point etc under PF06-22 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
4/11/2007
Accession No: 20070416-0218
Description:
Commentsof Robbie Cumberland Jr expressing concerns re the LNG issue in Sparrows
Point under PF06-22 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
4/18/200
200704184005
20
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its revised
Joint Application for US Army Corp of Engineers Section 404/10 Permit for the States of Maryland and
Pennsylvania under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/181200
Accession No: 20070418-.4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing the
application submitted to the Army Corp of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data
Request, CP07-62 et al. ado, adi. bp~, pro, usr and out files not loaded,
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
411812007
20070418-5071
Motion to Intervene Out of Time of Byers Commercial LP under CP07-62-000, et al,:.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/181200
Accession No: 20070425-0110
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC forward a copy of the
application submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data
Request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0111
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC forward a copy of the
application submitted to the Corps of Engineers m response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data
Request under CP07-62 et al. Part 1 of 2
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0112
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC forward a copy of the
application submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data
Request under CP07-62 et al. Part 2 of 2
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0113
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al. Part 1 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0114
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corp of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 2 of 5.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0115
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corp of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 2 of 5, LARGE FORMAT ONLY
21
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0116
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 3 of 5.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0117
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et aL Part 4 of 5
Filed By,:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC. MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0118
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Enwronmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 4 of 5. LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0119
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under
CP07-62 et al Part 5 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0120
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's Appendix 2D Wetland
Delineation Report to its application submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07
Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al Part 1 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0121
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's Appendix 2D Wetland
Delineation Report to its application submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3116107
Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al Part 2 of 5. jen
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0122
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC & d Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's Appendix 2D Wetland
Delineation Report to its appl submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07
Environmental Data Request. CP07-62 et al. Part 3 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/16/200
Accession No: 20070425-0123
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's Appendix 2D Wetland
Delineation Report to its application submitted to the Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07
Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al. Part 4 of 5
22
20090603-0005
FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Acceeelon No: 20070425-0124
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's Appendix 2D,Wetland
Delineation Report to their application submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's
3/16/07 Environmental Data Request CP07-62 et al. Part 5 of 5
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425o0125
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession No: 20070425-0126
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/181200
Accession No: 20070425-0127
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/18/200
Accession NO: 20070425-0128
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07~2 et al, LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0129
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0130
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0131
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers =n response to FERC's 3116107 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMATS ONLY
23
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Data:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0132
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Data:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0133
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's revised joint application
submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request
under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Data:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
41181200
Accession No: 20070425-0134
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's et al revised joint application submitted to the Army
Corps of Engineers in response to FERC's 3116107 Env;ronmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al
LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/19/200
Accession No: 20070419-4016
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its revised
figures, which contain updated topographic maps of possible route variations under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Data:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41191200
Accession No: 20070424-0216
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits revised Figures
10.6.4-1 through 10.64-14 containing updated topographic maps of possible route variations under
CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
41191200
Accession No: 20070424-0217
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits revised Figures
10 6 4-1 through 10 64-14 contaimng updated topographic maps of possible route variations under
CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION. FERC
4/20/2007
Accession No: 20070420-3038
Description:
Notice of Technical Conference scheduled for 518107 re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LCC
under CP07-62
Federal Register Citation: 72 FR 20845 Date: 4/2612007
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41231200
20070423-4044
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its response
to FERC's 413107Cryogenic Information Request under CP07-62 et al
Filed Data:
Accession No:
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
24
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Filed Date:
41231200
20070501-0076
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mtd-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
4/3/07 Cryogenic Informat=on Request under CP07-62 et al.
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41231200
Accession No: 20070501-0077
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC to FERC's
413107 Cryogenic Information Request under CP07-62 et al.
Flied By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/23/200
Accession No: 20070501-0078
Description:
Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC to FERC's
413107 Cryogenic Information Request under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41261200
Accession No: 20070510-0002
Deecription:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submit the proposed 2007
survey schedule and protocols for rare, threatened and endangered species under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
51112007
Accession No: 20070504-0223
Deacdptlon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits responses to
FERC's Environmental Data Requests issued on 3/16/07 etc under CP07.-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
51112007
Accession No: 20070504-0224
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits three tables in response to US Coast Guard
Request 3ee which were inadvertently omitted from its 4/5/07 filing under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070502-4007
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express LLC's CD containing its
Environmental Data Response; Supplemental Geology Response under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
51212007
Accession No: 20070509-0236
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
51212007
Accession No: 20070509-0237
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16107 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al. Part 1 of 3
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
25
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070509-0238
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al Part 2 of 3
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070509-0239
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology quest,ons from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al. Part 3 of 3
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070509-0240
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al Part 1 of 2
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
5/2/2007
Accession No: 20070509-0241
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits supplemental
responses to certain Geology questions from FERC's 3/16/07 Environmental Data Request under CP0762 et al Part 2 of 2
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
5/7/2007
20070507-4006
Summary of the 5/7/07 site visit re the AES Sparrow's Point LNG under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
5/14/2007
20070521-0187
Comments of Sean Guarnera express,ng concerns re the LNG Plant under CP07-62
Filed By:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
51161200
Accession No: 20070518-0211
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC submits the results of a
bald eagle nest occupancy survey conducted on 4/26/07 under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES Sparrows Po,nt LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
5/16/200
20070518-0212
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC submits the results of a
bald eagle nest occupancy survey conducted 4/26/07 for the proposed Mid-Atlantic Express Project under
CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
5/21/200
20070523-0120
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits Table 8 2.2-1 (Attachment LURA6c) in
response to the Land, Use, Recreation and Aesthetic Request 6 under CP07-62 et al.
Filed Date:
Accession No:
26
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
5/23/2007
Accession No: 20070525-0006
Description:
Maryland Department of the Environment's correspondence re joint Federal/State
application for the alteration of any floodplain, waterway, tidal or nontidal wetland in Maryland re AES
Sparrows Point LNG et al, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
5/2312007
Accession No: 20070525-0007
Description:
Comments of the Maryland Department of the Environmet regarding the proposed AES
Sparrows Point LNG facilty under CP07-62
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
51311200
Accession No: 20070613-0083
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits responses to Maryland Department of
Eqvironment data request issued on 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC: AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
51311200
Accession No: 20070613-0084
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits responses to Maryland Department of
Environment data request issued on 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMAT ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC; AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
5/31/200
Accession No: 20070613-0085
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits responses to Maryland Department of
Environment data request issued on 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al, LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC; AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
5/31/200
Accession No: 20070613-0086
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits responses to Maryland Department of
Environment data request issued on 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMAT ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
5/31/200
Accession No: 20070613-0087
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits its responses to the Maryland Department
of the Environment data request issued 5/7/07 under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LCC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
5/311200
Accession No: 20070613-0069
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their responses to
Maryland Department of Environment's 5/7/07 data request under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express LLC
6/4/2007
Accession No: 20070606-0161
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits the consultant's proposed modeling
methodology for vapor dispersion calculations under CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
FERC
27
tOO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
6/5/2007
20070605.4010
Description:
Minutesfrom the 6/5/07 InterAgency Meeting on Dredging/Dredged Material Disposal
conducted in Baltimore. MD re AES Sparrows Point LNG under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/6/2007
Accession No: 20070607-0263
Description:
AES Sparrows Point, LLC et al submits the ,nput and output information from a
subsequent re-run of the source program under CP07-62 et al.
FERC
6/1212007
Accession No: 20070612-4000
Descdption:
Minutesof the 6/5/07 meeting re the Sparrows Point Project - MDNR Air Quality Issues
under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
6/14/200
Accession No: 20070618-0274
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's et al response to the issues and/or questions raised in
the minutes from the meeting on Dredging / Dredged Material Disposal w,th FERC. US Army Corps of
Engineers et al under CP07-62
Issued By:
E N E R G YPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
6/1812007
Accession No: 20070618-3004
Description:
Letter to AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC discussing the Source Strength and Vapor
Dispersion Methodology under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
6/19/2007
Accession No: 20070622-0048
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC submits copy of letter responding to the US Coast
Guard's 4141407 reuqest for new & supplemental info to amend the Waterway Suitability Assessment for
the AES project, CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC
612512007
Accession No: 20070627-0144
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits ,ts supplemental response to FERC's
Environmental Data Request issued 3116107 concerning Vehicular Traffic etc under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
6/28/2007
Accession No: 20070628-4003
Description:
Mid-AtlanticExpress, LLC's CD containing Exhibits K through P to its application for
authorization to site, construct and operate an 88-mile pipeline to transport natural gas from the liquefied
natural gas import terminal proposed by AES, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
MID-ATLANTIC
EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
612812007
Accession No: 20070703-0031
Description:
Mid-AtlanticExpress LLC submits Exhib,ts K through P of the Application submitted on
118107 for a authorized certificate under CP07-62 et al
28
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/29/200
Accession No: 20070703-0231
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al repeats its certfication in connection with its FERC
applications and with respect to the proposed LNG Terminal and Pipeline Facilities state's coastal zone
under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
7/2/2007
Accession No: 20070702-4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing Attachment B & D of response to
issues et al by FERC et al during the 6/5/07 meeting re the resolution of Air Quality issues btw FERC &
MD Dept of Natural Resources, CP07-62 et al (pro & bpi not loaded)
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
7/2/2007
Accession No: 20070705-0261
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC responds to issues and/or
questions raised by FERC et al during the 6/5/07 meeting re the resolution of Air Quality issues between
FERC & MD Dept of Natural Resources, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
BYERS COMMERCIAL LP
7/5/2007
20070705-5053
Rerouting Proposal of Byers Commercial LP under CP07-62-000 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
7/9/2007
Accession No: 20070712-0003
Description:
US Army Corps of Engineers' response to AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's permit
application under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
7/11/2007
Accession No: 20070711-3026
Description:
Letter requesting AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid Atlantic Express, LLC to provide
within 20 days environmental information to assist FERC in their analysis re the Sparrows Point Project
under CP07-62 et al
ENVIRONMENTAL & ENGINEERING REVIEW
7/11/2007
20070716-0195
Email dated 7/11/07 forwarding a letter to AES from Maryland Department of the
Environment re the AES Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
7/24/200
Accession No: 20070724-4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD that contains their
response to to the US Army Corps of Engineers' 7/3/07 data request under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
712412007
Accession No: 20070724-4008
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' July 2007 Data Request under CP07-62 et al. Volume 1
29
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
7/24/2007
Accession No: 20070724-4009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' July 2007 Data Request under CP07-62 et al Volume 3,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
7/24/2007
Accession No: 20070724-4010
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' July 2007 Data Request under CP07-62 et al. Volume 4.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
7/24/200
Accession No: 20070730-0101
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their response to
the US Army Corps of Engineers' 7/3/07 data request under CP07-62 et al.
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC. MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
7/24/200
20070730-0102
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-AtlantLc Express, LLC submits their response to
to the US Army Corps of Engineers' 7/3/07 data request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
7/24/200
Accession No: 20070730-0103
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express LLC submits copies of their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' data request under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC; AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
7/24/200
Accession No: 20070730-0104
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits copies of their
response to the US Army Corps of Engineers' data request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, UNITED STATES
7/25/2007
Accession No: 20070807-0092
Description:
US House of Representative CA Dutch Ruppersberger re the federal court's ruling that a
LNG facility at Sparrwos Point, MD will violate the state's protected environmental sensitive areas of the
Chesapeak Bay under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
ENERGY PROJECTS. OFFICE OF
7/31/2007
Accession No: 20070731-4007
Description:
Record of 7/31/07 InterAgency Conference call between FERC, U S Army Corps of
Engineers, & the U S Environmental Protection Agency re respective data deficiencies in the various
applications etc under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
7/31/200
Accession No: 20070731-4008
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing Volume 1 to
its July 2007 Environmental Data Response under CP07-62 et al.
30
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTiC EXPRESS, LLC
71311200
Accession No: 20070731-4009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing Volume 2 to
its July 2007 Environmental Data Response under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
71311200
Accession No: 20070731-4010
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing Volume 3 to
its July 2007 Environmental Data Response under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
7/31/200
Accession No:
20070731-4011
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing Volume 4 to
its July 2007 Environmental Data Response under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
7/31/200
Accession No: 20070809-0107
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their response to
US Army Corps of Engineers's data request under CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
ENERGY PROJECTS. OFFICE OF
8/1/2007
Accession No: 20070801-4039
Description:
Minutes from the 8/1/07 meeting with AES re additional sediment sampling program &
other dredged material disposal issues - The 404 permit appl for the AES Sparrows Point LNG Terminal &
Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline (Sparrows Point Proj), CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Filed By:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
Filed D a t e :
81212007
Accession No: 20070802-5037
Description:
F,hngof MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, Federal Consistency
Determination pursuant to CZMA, under CP07-62, et al.:,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES OCEAN EXPRESS LLC
8/6/2007
Accession No: 20070806-5032
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's Response to question raised during the August 1. 2007
technical conference, Under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
81812007
20070809-0174
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits a Notice of Appeal under CP07-62.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
81912007
Accession No: 20070813-0144
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits the results of the analysis performed by
LPES. Inc to determine the level of service of the 1-695 Exit 43 on-ramps and off-ramps under CP07-62 et
a:,
31
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
8/10/200
Accession No: 20070814-0177
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits the "Sparrows Point LNG - LNG Vapor
Dispersion from Troughs" report under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
8/10/200
Accession No: 20070814-0178
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC submits the "Sparrows
Point LNG - LNG Vapor Dispersion from Troughs" report, in response to FERC's 3/16/07 environmental
data request under CP07-62
Issued By:
ENVIRONMENTAL& ENGINEERING REVIEW; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT
Filed Date:
8/27/200
Accession No: 20070830-0037
Description:
Memo dated 8/23/07 providing Maryland Dept of the Environment's letter re AEs
Sparrowd Point LNG's et al dredging and pipeline construction to be placed in public record under CP0762
Filed By:
ENVIRONMENTAL
& ENGINEERING REVIEW; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT
Filed Date:
8/27/200
Accession No: 20070830-0037
Description:
M e m odated 8/23107 providing Maryland Dept of the Environment's letter re AEs
Sparrowd Point LNG's et al dredging and pipeline construction to be placed in public record under CP0762.
Filed By:
MARYLANDDEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES; OFFICE OF ATTORNEY
GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Filed Date:
8/28/200
Accession No: 20070828-5004
Description:
Responseof Maryland Department of the Environment to AES submittals under CFRA,
re CP07-62-000, et al.:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91412007
Accession No: 20070904-4042
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
responses to the Maryland Department of Environment Data Request Jssued 8/15/07 under CP07-62 et
al (Volume 2),
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91412007
Accession No: 20070904-4043
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
responses to the Maryland Department of Environment Data Request issued 8/15/07 under CP07-62 et
al (Volume 1),
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/4/2007
Accession No: 20070910-0173
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their responses to
the Maryland Department of Environment Data Request issued 8/15/07 under CP07-62 et al.
32
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91412007
Accession No: 20070910-0174
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their responses to
the Maryland Department of Environment Data Request issued 8/15/07 under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/712007
20070907-4013
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing its bnef and appendix under CP07-
62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91712007
Accession No: 20070913-0045
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits a Brtef and
Aopendix under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
9/7/2007
Accession No: 20070913-0046
Description:
Appendix to initial brief on appeal of AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express
LLC re Maryland Department of Environment under CP07-62 et al.I Volume 2 of 3, Part 1 of 2
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; M~d-Atlantic Express LLC
9/7/2007
Accession No: 20070913-0047
Description:
Appendix to initial brief on appeal of AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic
Express LLC vs Maryland Department of Environment under CP07-62 et al. Vol 1 of 3; Part 2 of 2
Flied By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
91712007
Accession No: 20070913-0048
Description:
Appendix to initial brief on appeal of AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express
LLC re Maryland Department of Environment under CP07-62 et al I Volume 2 of 3.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/712007
Accession No: 20070913-0049
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits a Brief and
Appendix under CP07-62 et al.
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
9/11/2007
20070911-5003
Descdption:
Comment on AES July 2007 response to FERC concerning air quality Filing of PPRPMaryland DNR under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Flied By:
Filed D a t e :
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
9/24/2007
Accession No: 20070926-0021
Description:
Maryland Department of the Environment submits their response to FERC's letter re the
proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG Facility under CP07-62
33
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
Filed By:
COMPANY
FUed Date:
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
BALTIMOREGAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY; BALTIMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC
9/25/200
20070925-5030
Description:
BaltimoreGas and Electric Company Submission of Technical Information and
Comments under CP07-62 et al.
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91271200
Accession No: 20071018-0093
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits its Response detailing the results of the
August 2007 sampling event conducted under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLANDDEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
101912007
Accession No: 20071012-0151
Description:
MarylandDepartment of the Environment submits its Brief and Appendix re the AES
Sparrows Point LNG Coastal Zone Management Act Consistency Appeal under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
1011012007
Accession No: 20071010-5007
Description:
Brief of MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT in AES v MDE, Appeal from
Denial of Coastal Zone Consistency, before US Department of Commerce, re: CP07-63, et al
Filed By:
BAKER BOTTS LLP; AES OCEAN EXPRESS LLC
Filed Date:
Accession No:
10/15/20
7
20071015-5061
Description:
Further Response of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC. et al to July 3, 2007 ACOE
Request under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
COMMERCE,DEPARTMENT OF
10/15/2007
Accession No: 20071022-0133
Description:
US Department of Commerce's request for FERC comments on an administrative appeal
pending before the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to the Coastal Zone Management Act under CP0762
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
10/17/20
7
Accession No: 20071017-4004
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC & Mid-Atlant;c Express, LLC's CD containing its Air
Repsonse under CP07-62 (ado & adi files not loaded)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
10/17/2007
Accession No: 20071018-0183
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC responds to the 9/11/07 comments of the Maryland
Department of Natural Resources re the cumulative air quality impacts analysis etc under CP07-62
Issued By:
ENERGYPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
10122/2007
Accession No: 20071022-3002
Description:
Letterrequesting AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al to file a new preferred route
alignment or identify a new preferred route that would avoid the 1-695 corridor altogether under CP07-62
et al
Filed Date:
34
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
05/29/2009
(Unofficial)
Issued By:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION, FERC
1012312007
Accession No: 20071023-3055
Description:
Notice of FERC Staff attendence re AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express
LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
Accession No:
10131120
7
20071031-4023
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing their
Reply Brief on Appeal and Supplemental Appendix under the Coastal Zone Management Act under
CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
10131120
7
Accession No: 20071106-0088
Description:
Reply Brief on Appeal and Supplemental Appendix of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and
Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
11111200
Accession No: 20071105-0108
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits response to
FERC's 10/22/07 letter re the pipeline proposal in the US Interstate (I)-695 corridor under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
EL PASO NATUAL GAS COMPANY
11/1/2007
20071106-0195 NOTE This document is not part of this docket/sub docket
Filed By:
EL PASO NATUAL GAS COMPANY
111112007
Accession No: 20071106-0196
Description:
El Paso Natural Gas Company's application requesting authorization for construction,
ownership, and operation of a new delivery lateral and compression facilities etc under CP08-14 LARGE
FORMAT ONLY
Filed D a t e :
Issued By:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
11/7/2007
Accession No: 20071107-3006
Descdptlon:
Letter informng the National Oceamc & Atmospheric Administration that FERC is not in
the position to comment on the issues raised by its letter re the Coastal Zone Management Act for the
AES Sparrows Point LNG Project. CP07-62 et al
Filed D a t e :
Issued By:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
111712007
Accession No: 20071120-0081
Deecdption:
Letter informing US Department of Commerce that FERC is not in a position to comment
on an Administrative Appeal to the Coastal Zone Management Act for the AES Sparrows Point LNG
Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed D a t e :
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
11/19/20
7
20071123-0021
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al submits addendum to Resource Report 10 under
CP07-62 et al
35
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
et al,
05/29/2009
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
11/19/20
7
20071123-0022
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits addendum to Resource Report 10 under
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
12/4/200
20071206-0149
Comments of regarding AES Corporation's AES Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
12/5/200
Accession No: 20071206-0146
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits a supplemental
response to the MD Dept of Environments and Waterway Program Information Request under CP07-62
et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
12/11/20
7
Accession No: 20071212-0067
Description:
Commentsof Edmund and Crista Ford regarding the reroute request concerning AES
Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
12/13/20
7
Accession No: 20071217-0074
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits an application for exception from the MSHA
Utility Policy to Maryland State Highway Administration under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
NATURAL RESOURCES
Filed Date:
12127120
7
Accession No: 20071227-5025
Description:
Filingof MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, et al,- State of MD's Federal
Consistency Review and Determination under CP07-63-000, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
BAKER BOTTS LLP; AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC
12127120
7
Accession No: 20071227-5032
Description:
Minutesof Meeting between Maryland State Highway Administration and Mid-Atlantic
Express on November 8, 2007 under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
et al
BAKER BOTTS LLP
12/28/2007
20071228-5028
Correspondence from AES to the Maryland Department of the Environment in CP07-62,
Issued By:
SECRETARYOF THE COMMISSION, FERC
11312008
Accession No: 20080103-3025
Description:
Noticeof Technical Conference re AES Sparrows Point LNG, L C.C and Mid-Atlantic
Express, L L C under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
36
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Issued By:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION, FERC
11812008
Accession No: 20080108-3041
Description:
Amendment to previous notice of technical conference re AES Sparrows Point LNG,
L C C and Mid-Atlantic Express. L.L.C, under CP07-62 et al.
Filed D a t e :
INDIVIDUAL
1/14/2008
20080118-0232
Description:
Comments of Lisa J Gall=ck expressing concerns re AES Sparrows Point Project's route
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
1/14/200
Accession No: 20080118-0245
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al submits its Notice of Pending Appeal under the
Coastal Zone Management Act under CP07-62
Issued By:
FERC
112112008
Accession No: 20080121-4001
Description:
Summary of the minutes from the 1/15/08 meeting between FERC, US Army Corps of
Engineers, BGE. et al re Sparrows Point Import Terminal and Mid-Atlantic Express Ptpeline Project under
CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
BAKER BOTTS LLP, AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC
1/25/200
Accession No: 20080125-5023
Description:
Correspondence from AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, L.L.C. to
Maryland Department of the Env,ronment under CP07-62-000, et al :.
Flied By:
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT
Filed Date:
11281200
Accession No: 20080128-5003
Description:
Comments of MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, et al, on supplemental
information provided by AES LNG, under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
1/30/200
Accession No: 20080204-0193
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al requests to supplement the consolidated record
prepared in accordance with National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's letter dated 1/10/08
under CP07-62
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC
MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed D a t e :
2/1/2008
Accession No: 20080201-4009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al CD containing updated Appendix 10D to the
Addendum to Resource Report 10, Alternatives of the Environmental Report under CP07-62 et aL
Updated Appendix 10D
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
21112O08
37
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
20080201-4010
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al CD containing updated Appendix 10D to the
Addendum to Resource Report 10, Alternatives of the Environmental Report under CP07-62 et al
Updated Appendix 10D
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
AES CORPORATION
2/1/2008
20080201-4013
Description:
E-mail correspondence from AES Corporation providing clarification of AES's position
concerning LNG sJte preparation etc under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
2/1/2008
20080207-0172
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits updated Appendix 10D to the Addendum to
Resource Report 10, Alternatives of the Environmental Report under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
2/1/2008
20080207-0173
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al submits updated Appendix 10d to the Addendum to
Resource report 10, Alternatives of the Environmental Report under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
2/6/2008
Accession No: 20080208-0229
Description:
AES Sparrow Point LNG,LLC and Mid Atlantic Express. LLC submits response of 1/23/08
request of the Maryland Dept of the Environment for additional information re AES application for a Tidal
Wetlands License and a Nontidal Wetlands etc under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
2/6/2008
20080208-0230
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express LLC informs that they submitted
addibonal copies of AES's sediment sampling analysis and follow up elutriate analysis on 1/5/08 to the
United States Army Corps of Engineers under CP07-63 et al
issued By:
ENERGY PROJECTS. OFFICE OF
2/7/2008
Accession No: 20080207-3003
Description:
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al
AES Sparrows Point LNG Project under CP07-62 et al,
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
2/22/2008
Accession No: 20080227-0025
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits correspondence from the USACE re
add=tional sets of wetlands delineation maps to be used for field verification for the proposed Mid-Atlanhc
Express pipehne project, CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
COAST GUARD, UNITED STATES
2/28/200
Accession No: 20080228-4001
Description:
US Coast Guard's Waterway Suitabdity Report (WSR) for the Sparrows Point LNG
Project under CP07-62
38
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. UNITED STATES SENATE
2/28/2008
Accession No: 20080306-0212
Description:
US Senator Barbara A Mikulskl et al submits comments re the US Coast Guard's
waterway suitability report and AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's applicat=on for the proposed LNG site in
Baltimore County, MD udner CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC
3/1112008 4:40:03 PM
20080311-5101
Supplemental Information of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC under CP07-62
Issued By:
SENATE, UNITED STATES; CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
3/20/200
Accession No: 20080403-0141
Description:
Response to US Senator Benjamin L Cardin's 2/28108 letter re the AES Sparrows Point
LNG Project under CP07-62.
Filed D a t e :
Issued By:
Filed Date:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
3/20/2008
Accession No: 20080403-0142
Description:
Letter responding to US Representative Elijah E Cummings' letter dated 2/28/08 re the
AES Sparrows Point LNG Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
3/20/2008
Accession No: 20080403-0143
Description:
Response to US Senator Barbara A Mikulski's 2/28/08 letter regarding the AES Sparrows
Point LNG Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
3/2012008
20080403-0146 NOTE: This document is not part of this docket/sub docket
Issued By:
Filed Date:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
3/20/2008
Accession No: 20080422-0014
Description:
Response to US Senator Benjamin L Cardin's 2/28/08 letter re the AES Sparrows Point
LNG Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
3/21/2008
20080403-0158 NOTE: Thts document is not part of this docket/sub docket.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
3/24/2008
20080403-0105 NOTE: This document is not part of this docket/sub docket.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
The Hankin Group
3/25/2008 4:59:07 PM
Accession No: 20080326-5003
Description:
Comments of The Hankin Group to application of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and
Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
The Hankin Group
4/212008 8:30:00 AM
39
tOO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20080402-5003
Motionto Intervene Out-of-Time of The Hankin Group and Hankin Enterprises, Ltd under
CP07-62-000. et al.
Accession No:
Description:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
41312008
Accession No: 20080403-0139
Description:
Responseto US Representative John P Sarbanes' 2/28108 letter re the AES Sparrows
Point LNG Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
41312008
Accession No: 20080403-0140
Description:
Letter responding to US Representative C A Dutch Ruppersberger's letter dated 2128108
re the AES Sparrows Point LNG Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
al.
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
41111200
4'48 31 PM
20080411-5166
Response to Data Request of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC, et, al under CP07-62, et
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/171200
Accession No: 20080421-0067
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic Express. LLC submits a supplemental
response to the Maryland Department of the Environmental Data Request issued 1/23/08 under CP07-63
et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLCI MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
4/17/200
Accession No: 20080421-0069
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid Atlantic Express, LLC submits a supplemental
response to the Maryland Department of the Environmental Data Request issued 1/23/08 under CP07-63
et al,
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
41211200
20080421-0068
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic Express. LLC submits a supplemental
response to the Maryland Department of the Environmental Data Request issued 1123108 under CP07-63
et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Issued By:
E N E R G YPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
412512008
Accession No: 20080425-3006
Description:
Letter to National Marine Fisheries Service requesting concurrence with FERC's
determinations of effect for the nine species re the Biological Assessment for Sparrows Point LNG
Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed Date:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGY PROJECTS. OFFICE OF
4/25/2008
20080425-3007
Issued By:
Filed Date:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
4/25/2008
40
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20080425-3008
Letter providing the National Marine Fisheries Service with the draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Accession No:
Descdption:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION, FERC
4/2512008
20080425-3015
Description:
Notice of Availability of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed
Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP0762 et al.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Desedption:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
4/25/2008
20080425-4000
Draft Environmental Impact Statement re Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline
Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
SENATE, UNITED STATES
412912008
20080515-0156
Descdptlon:
US Senator Barbara A Mikulski submits comments re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and
Med-Atlantic Express, LLC proposed facility and pipeline under CP07-62
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
Filed Date:
51812008
Accession No: 20080516-0102
Description:
Comments of Larry & Shidey Smoose re the installation of the proposed gas line under
CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
5/1212008
Accession No: 20080512-4023
Description:
Minutes from the 518108teleconference between FERC, AMEC Paragon, AES et al
regarding Sparrows Point Project - Air Quality Issues (Conformity - DEIS Conditions #85 & 87) under
CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
511212008
20080516-0125
Descdptlon:
Maryland Department of Planning submits comments re Draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62
Filed By:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
5/12/2008
Accession No: 20080516-0126
Description:
Maryland Department of Planning discusses the review of the permit application for the
AEs Sparrows Point, LLC's et al dredging structures in waters of US under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
5/13/2008
20080513-3026
Descdption:
Letter requesting the Department of Defense to provide w/in 45 days a written response
indicating whether the DoD concurs with FERC's determiation of effect or has any outstanding concerns
re the draft EIS- Sparrows Point LNG Project, CP07-62 et al
41
tOO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Aff=l=at=on
5/15/2008 11;50:38 AM
20080515-5039
Comment of Todd Schaible in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62 Submission Date: 5/15/2008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Maryland Waterfowlers Association
5/22/2008 255 34 PM
20080522-5063
Protest of Maryland Waterfowlers Association under CP07-62-000.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
5/23/2008
20080602-0022
Description:
Response to US Senator Benjamin L Cardin's 4/29/08 letter commenting on the draft
environmental impact statement for the AES Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP0762
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
5/23/2008
20080602-0023
Description:
Response to US Senator Barbara A Mikulski's 4129108 letter commenting on the draft
environmental impact statement for the AES Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP0762
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
5/23/2008
Accession No: 20080602-0024
Description:
Response to US Senator Elijah E Cummings's 4/29/08 letter commenting on the draft
environmental ~mpact statement for the AES Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under CP0762
Filed Date:
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
5/23/2008
Accession No: 20080602-0025
Description:
Response to US Representative John P Sarbanes' 4/29/08 letter commenting on the
draft environmental impact statement for the AES Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under
CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
5/23/2008
20080602-0026
Description:
Response to US Representative Dutch Ruppersberger's 4/29/08 letter commenting on
the draft environmental impact statement for the AES Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Project under
CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
6/5/2008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Individual No Affiliation
6/5/2008
20080605-5017
Comment of Robert Shepord Jn Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62-000 Submission Date
HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT. DEPARTMENT OF
6/6/2008
20080610-0257
42
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development submits comments on the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point LNG & Mid-Atlantic Express Pipehne Project
under CP07-62 et al,
FERC
6/912008
Accession No: 20080609-4007
Description:
Transcript of the 6/9/08 scoping meeting held in Baltimore, MD at the Patapsco High
School Auditorium re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, (PA)
6/9/2008
Accession No: 20080610-0250
Description:
Correspondence from the Upper Uwchlan Township reiterating no preference for the reroute plans 12-A and 12-B for Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Individual No Affiliation
611012008
Accession No: 20080610-5001
Description:
Comment of Sabnna A Burkindine in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62-000, CP07-63-000,
CP07-64-000, CP07-65-000 Submission Date: 611012008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
BALTIMORE COUNTY (MD)
611012008
Accession No: 20080610-5049
Description:
Comments of BALTIMORE COUNTY GOVERNMENT (MD) on the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the Sparrow Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62, et. al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
SENATE, UNITED STATES
611012008
Accession No: 20080611-0072
Description:
Comments of US Senator Barbara A Mikulski expressing concerns to the proposed LNG
facility at Sparrows Point in Baltimore, Maryland under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION
6/10/2008
Accession No: 20080619-0073
Description:
Pennsylvania Game Commission submits response to FERC's April 2008 letter re the
potential impacts of projects on special concern species of birds or mammals and State Game Lands
under CP07-62 et al
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
6/11/2008
20080611-4002
Description:
Minutes from the 6/11/08 teleconference between FERC, AMEC Paragon et al regarding
Sparrows Point Project - Updated Conformity Analysis under CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
FERC
6/11/2008
Accession No: 20080611-.4004
Description:
Transcript of the 6/11/08 joint public hearing held in Downingtown, PA at the East
Brandywine Fire Hall re AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's et al Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et
Issued By:
Filed Date:
al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
FERC
6/12/2008
43
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20080612-4017
Description:
Transcript of the 6/12108 scoping meeting held in Edgewood, MD at the Ramada
Conference Center Edgewood Richlin Ballroom re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al Sparrows Point
Project under CP07~2 et al.
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
611212008
Accession No: 20080612-5000
Description:
Commentsof Adam Udell in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62-000, CP07-63-000, CP07-64000, CP07-65-000 Submission Date 6/12/2008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
6/1212008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
6/12/2008
20080612-5046
Comment of Norris McDonald in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62 Submission Date
African American Environmentalist Association
6/12/2008
20080612-5069
Comments of African American Environmentalist Association under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Flied Date:
PENNSYLVANIA
GAME COMMISSION
6/12/2008
Accession No: 20080619-0076
Descdption:
PennsylvaniaGame Commission submtts their response to FERC's April 2008 letter re
the potential impacts of project on special concern species of birds or mammals and State Game Lands
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resource
6/13/2008
Accession No: 20080613-5004
Description:
Report / Form of Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
under CP07-62-000, et al PA-DCNR comments concerning Sparrow's Point draft EIS document.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
6/13/2OO8
20080613-5007
Comment of Eric J Newman under CP07-63, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
BALTIMORE COUNTY (MD)
6/1312008
20080613-5049
Notice of Deposition of BALTIMORE COUNTY (MD) under CP07-62-000, et al
Descdption:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
6/13/2008
Accession No: 20080613-5126
Description:
Commentsof PAMELA GREEN in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62, CP07-63, CP07-64,
CP07-65 Submission Date: 6/13/2008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
6/13/2008
Accession No: 20080616-0058
Descdption:
LNG Opposition Team submits findings and recommendation for the FERC Draft
Enwronmental Impact Statement re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
44
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Acceeeion No: 20080616-4002
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al. E:\Public\DEIS Comment 14 - Geotech for
HDD
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4003
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
61161200
Accession No: 20080616-4004
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al. E:\Public\DEIS Comment 16 - Alternatives
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4005
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E:\Pubhc\DEIS Comment 19 - Variation 8
SSP
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CO containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al. E:\Public\DEIS Comment 29 - Draft Seismic
Design
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4007
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E:\Public\DEIS Comment 30 - Seismic
Design
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4008
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing =ts
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E:\Pubhc\DEIS Comment 43 - Dredge Plan.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4009
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et aL E\Pubhc\DEIS Comment 44 - Hydrostahc
Test Water
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
45
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20080616-4010
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E\Public\DEIS Comment 46 - Non-Tidal
Wetlands Special Concern
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4011
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E:\Public\DEIS Comment 47 ARMP.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4012
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E:\Public\DEIS Comment 52 - Patapsco River.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4013
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E \Public\DEIS Comment 54 - Seasonal
Construction Restnctions
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4014
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E:\Public\DEIS Comment 57 - Sea Turtle
Seasonal Construction Restrictions
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4015
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al. E:\Public\DEIS Comment 59 - Bog Turtle
Plan
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
6/16/200
Accesaion No: 20060616-4016
Description:
AES Sparrows Pomt LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendat=ons under CP07-62 et aL E:\Public\DEIS Comment 62 SSP Residential
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
61161200
Accession No: 20080616-4017
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al E:\Public\DEIS Comment 63 - Sepbc System
through E:\Public\Large Format
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
6/16/200
20080616-4018
46
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD containing its
response to DEIS Recommendations under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
6/16/200
Accession No: 20080616-4023
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's CD containing its
comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Sparrows Point LNG Terminal
and P,peline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Individual No Affiliation
Filed Date:
6/1612008
Accession No: 20080616-5008
Description:
Comments of Lisa J. Gallick requesting a reroute investigation for the proposed AES
Sparrows Point Project in Upper Uwchlan Township, PA under CP07-62, et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Individual No Affiliation
6/16/2008
Accession No: 20080616-5014
Descdption:
Comments of Joyce Engle in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62. CP07-63, CP07-65
Submission Date 6/16/2008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
6/16/2008
20080616-5015
Comments of Sheri Hipsley in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62 Submission Date:
6/16/2008.
Filed By:
Filed Data:
Chesapeake Bay Yacht Clubs Association
611612008
Accession Not 20080616-5018
Description:
Testimony of Chesapeake Bay Yacht Clubs Association against LNG facilities at
Sparrows Point, MD. CBYCA supports reasonable LNG development, but oppose LNG facilities in areas
near heavy recreational marine traffic under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descrip~on:
Individual No Affiliation
6/16/2008
20080616-5027
Comment of Judith E Rose in CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
Department of the Interior, OEPC
6/16/2008
20080616-5031
Comment of Department of the Interior, OEPC under CP07-62-000
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
further analysis
Individual No Affiliation
6/16/2008
20080616-5038
Comment of Richard J and Victoria S Channell under CP07-62-000, et. al. Requesting
on route var,ation 12B in Upper Uwchlan Township, Pennsylvania
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Individual No Affiliation
611612008
20080616-5039
Comment of Marsha A Dalton in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62 Submiss,on Date:
Deecdption:
6J16/2008
4?
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
6/16/2008
Accession No: 20080616-5043
Description:
Steve McNaughton et al Comment on DEIS - Economic impact of Proposed Route and
Variation 12a to proposed subdivision under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
6/16/200
20080616-5047
Comments of James B Bullitt, III under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Ind,vidualNo Affiliation
6/16/2008
Accession No: 20080616-5051
Description:
Commenton DEIS for CP07--62, et al argument for variation 12b, and against vanation
12a or Proposed Route
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Lancaster County Planning Commission
6/16/2008
Accession No: 20080616-5067
Description:
Commentsof the Lancaster County Planning Commission staff under CP07-62-000,CP07-63-000. CP07-64-000. CP07-65-000 regarding the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project
Draft Environmental Impact statement
Description:
Maryland Department of Natural Resources
6/16/2008
20080616-5079
Comment of Maryland Department of Natural Resources under CP07-62 et al_
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
CHESTER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
6/16/2008
20080616-5089
Comment of CHESTER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION under CP07-63, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration
6/16/2008
20080616-5092
Comment of National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Chester County Water Resources Authority
6/16/2008
Accession No: 20080616-5096
Description:
Commentsof Chester County Water Resources Authority under CP07.62-000. CP07.63000, CP07-64-000. CP07-65-000 for Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
6/16/2008
Accession No: 20080616-5119
Description:
Commentof Alison Prost in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62-000. CP07-63-000. CP07-64000. CP07-65-000 Submission Date: 611612008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
6/16/200
20080618-0018
48
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits information requested in the Draft
Envpronmental Impact Statement under CP07-62 et al
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LCCI MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS LLC
61161200
Accession No: 20080618-0019
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits Volume II - additional information requested
=nthe Draft Environmental Impact Statement under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND
611612008
20080619-0050
Filed By:
M A R Y L A N DMARITIME ASSOCIATION
611612008
20080619-0051
Description:
The Maryland Maritime Association submits comments re proposed LNG terminal at
Sparrows Point under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
PENNSYLVANIADEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECT
611612008
Accession No: 20080619-0054
Description:
Commentsof Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection re the Sparrows
Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, (PA)
611612008
Accession No: 20080619-0057
Description:
Upper Uwchlan Township informs that they have reviewed the re-route plans known as
12-A et al as depicted in figure 3.3 3-11 of the Draft Environmental Impact Statement dated April 2008 re
Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Proj under CP07--62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
611612008
Accession No: 20080619-0061
Descdptton:
Comments of Thomas Sumeson re the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Mid-Atlantic
Express Pipelilne Projects under CP007-62 et al.
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL(NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
6/16/2008
Accession No: 20080619-0088
Description:
Comments of William E Murphy re the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Mid-Atlantic
Express Pipeline Projects under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
M A R Y L A N DDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
611612008
Accession No: 20080619-0090
Description:
Correspondence from Maryland Dept of Planning re the Permit Apphcation for AES
Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al Dredging and structures in water of US etc under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLCI MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
61161200
Accession No: 20080619-0108
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG et al submits comments on the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement etc under CP07-62 et al.
49
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Stewards of the Lower Susquehanna, Inc.
6/17/2008
Accession No: 20080617-5001
Description:
Commentsof Stewards of the Lower Susquehanna, Inc on lhe Draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62, et al
Turner Station Development Corporation, Incorporated
6/17/2008
Accession No: 20080617-5007
Description:
Comments of Turner Station Development Corporation, Incorporated and Turner Station
Community Conservation Teams under CP07-62-000, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
The Hankin Group
6/17/2008
Accession No: 20080617-5009
Description:
Comment of The Hankin Group under CP07-62-000, et al to Draft Environmental
Impact Statement of AES Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No AffiJiation
6/17/20O8
20080617-5018
Comments of Brian Fenimore for the Proposed Mitigation Tract 990 1 Plan under CP07-
62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Individual No Affiliation
6/17/2008
Accession No: 20080617-5077
Description:
Comments of Peter Deen in Docket(s}/Project{s) CP07-62, CP07-63. CP07-64, CP07-65
Submission Date: 6/17/2008
Flied By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
6/17/200
Accession No: 20080619-0055
Description:
Comments of Cliff and Nancy Pollack re the AES Mid-Atlantic Express Pipe)ine project
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Individual No Affiliation
6/18/2008
Accession No: 20080617-5176
Description:
Comments of Brandywine Conservancy on the Draft Enwronmental Impact Statement for
a liquefied natural gas (LNG) import terminal expansion and natural gas facilities under CP07-62, et al..
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA
6/18/2008
Accession No: 20080618-5010
Description:
Comments, Requests, and Cnt~cal evaluation by Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA
concerning the Draft Impact Environmental Statement for the Sparrow Point LNG Terminal and P~pehne
Project under CP07-62. et al.
CHESTER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
6/18/2008
Accession No: 20080619-0084
Description:
The Chester County Planning Commission provides comments on the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point/Mid-Atlantic Express P~peline Project under
CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
50
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
CHESAPEAKE BAY YACHT CLUBS ASSOCIATION
6/18/2008
20080620-0033
Chesapeake Bay Yacht Club Associat,on submits the testimony re the LNG facilities
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
6/18/2008
20080620-0035
Comments of Elizabeth A Anan re Sparrows Point LNG Terminal under CP07~2 et al
Flied By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
6/18/2008
Accession No: 20080620-0036
Description:
Comments of Carolyn McArthur re the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Mid-Atlantic
Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
6/1912008
Accession No: 20080623-0002
Description:
Comments of Elizabeth A Anan re the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Mid-Atlantic
Express P~peline Projects under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
6/1912008
Accession No: 20080623-0003
Description:
Comments of Carolyn McArthur re Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and M~d-Atlantic
Express Pipeline Projects under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
61191200
Accession No: 20080623-0008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
611912008
Accession No: 20080623-0009
Description:
Comments of Caitlin MacDougall re Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Mid-Atlantic
Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
6/19/200
Accession No: 20080623-0010
Description:
Comments of Rick and Diane MacDougall re Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and MidAtlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
6/19/2008
Accession No: 20080623-0011
Description:
Comments of Jean MacDougall re Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Mid-Atlantic
Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
6/23/2008
20080624-0224
51
tOO9O6O3-OOO5
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Departmentof the Army submits response to the FERC 4/25/08 draft Environmental
Impact Statement for the proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project
under CP07-62 et al
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL MARYLAND
6/23/2008
Accession No: 20080624-0235
Description:
Girl Scouts of Central Maryland informs that on 6/16/08 their CEO received e cart,fled
letter from AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC regarding the AES Sparrows Point
LNG. LLC project under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLANDDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
6/23/2008
Accession No: 20080624-0238
Description:
Maryland Department of Planning submits a Summary of F,ndings re US Army Corps of
Engineers et al Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point LNG Project under CP0762 et el
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
6/23/2008
Accession NO: 20080625-0131
Description:
Commentsof Dawn Cassel re Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Mid-Atlantic Express
Pipeline Projects under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
6/23/2008
20080625-0132
Comments of GuJdo Guranaccia re AES/LNG Sparrows Point under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
U N I T E DSTATES ENVIRONEMTNAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10
6/23/2008
Accession No: 20080626-0014
Description:
UnitedStates Environmental Protection Agency informs that they reviewed the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Terminal and Pipeline
Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
6/23/2008
Accession No: 20080627-0119
Description:
Writtencomments subm,tted by 43 ,nd,v,duals at the public comment meeting held June
9-12,2008 re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
6/2512008
Accession No: 20080625-5006
Description:
Commentsof Tim McAleese regarding the proposed pipeline construction project of
Columbia Gas pipeline under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
C H A D S E YDVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
6/26/2008
Accession No: 20080701-0016
Description:
Chadsey Development Services, LLC submits comments on behalf of three owners re
the proposed BGE right-of-way under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CHADSEY DVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
6/26/2008
52
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
2008070%0017
Description:
Chadsey Development Services, LLC submits comments on behalf of three owners re
the proposed BGE right-of-way under CP07-62 LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
C H A D S E YDVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
6/26/2008
Accession No: 20080701-0018
Description:
Chadsey Development Services, LLC submits comments on behalf of three owners re
the proposed BGE right-of-way under CP07-62 LARGE FORMATS ONLY.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62 et al,
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
61271200
20080627-5076
Secretary of Commerce Decision on AES Sparrows Point Consistency Appeal under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
61301200
Accession No: 20080630-5020
Descdption:
Updated General Conformity Determination for AES Sparrows Point under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
6/30/2008
Accession No: 20080707-0163
Description:
Commentsof US Representative Joseph R Pitts on behalf of constituents re Sparrows
Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-82
Filed By:
Filed Date:
C H E S T E RWATER AUTHORITY (PA)
613012008
Accession No: 20080710-0108
Description:
Chester Water Authority submits comments re the proposed AES/Mid Atlantic Express
Natural Gas 30-inch Transmission Main Crossing CWA property under PF06-22 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND MARITIME ASSOCIATION
6/30/2008
Accession No: 20080710-0126
Descdptlon:
Maryland Maritime Association resubmits their letter re the customers of Port of Baltimore
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Individual No Affiliation
7/1/2008
Accession No: 20080701-5048
Description:
Comment of Mitchell L Miller in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62 Submission Date: 71112008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CHESTER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
71312008
Accession No: 20080703-5034
Description:
Commentsof EAST FALLOWFIELD TOWNSHIP HISTORICAL COMMISSION filed by
Chester County Planning Commiss=on under CP07-62, et. al.,
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
71312008
Accession No: 20080709-0032
Description:
Responseto US Senator Barbara A Mikulski's 615108 letter commenting on the Draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the AES Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under
CP07-62
Filed Date:
53
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
US DEPT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT
7/7/2008
20080709-0062
Description:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development submits an amendment to their
comments on the DEIS re Sparrows Point LNG & Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et
al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
7/1512008
20080718-0211
Comments of Mary Jo Kovic concerning Mid-Atlantic Express LNG pipeline under CP07-
62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
7/17/2008
20080730-0133
Description:
Letter responding to US Senator Barbara Mikulskl's letter dated 7/3/08 expressing her
concerns with the AES Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP0762.
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
7/18/2008
Accession No: 20080730-0134
Description:
Lette responding to US Representative Joseph Pitts' letter dated 6/23/08 re the draft
environmental impact statement issued 4/25/08 for the AES Sparrows Point Liquefied Natural Gas
Terminal and P~peline Project, CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
CONGRESSOF THE UNITED STATES
7/21/2008
20080731-0189
Description:
Congress of the United States submits comments re the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal
and Pipeline Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION. FERC
7/28/2008
20080728-3011
Notice of meeting re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION, FERC
7/29/2008
Accession No: 20080729-3030
Descdption:
Noticeof Site Visit to be held on 8/12/08 et al re AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC and MidAtlantic Express LLC under CP07-62 et al
Issued
By:
Filed Date:
By:
MARYLANDDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING
8/1/2008
Accession No: 20080805-0108
Description:
MarylandDepartment of Planmng submits their responses to the Corps of Engineers'
request re the review of Draft Enwronmental Impact Statement for Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and
Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
BP Energy Company
8/6/2008
20080806-5063
54
20090603-0005
FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL AND CHANGE OF SERVICE LIST FOR BP
ENERGY COMPANY UNDER DOCKET NO, CP07-62, et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
8/6/2008
20080813-0283
Description:
Response to US Representative Joseph R Pitts' 7/9/08 letter re the AES Sparrows Point
Liquefied Natural Gas Terminal and Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
8/12/2008
20080812-3032
Description:
Letter requesting AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al to file a complete response within
20 days re an Environmental Data Request under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
8/12/2008
Accession No: 20080812-4010
Description:
United States Department of the Interior offers comments on the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement dated April 2008 for the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under
CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
8/12/2008
Accession No: 20080814-0113
Description:
The Department of the Army submits response to the FERC's 4/25/08 draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlanhc Express Pipeline
Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
8/13/2008
20080813-5034
Protest of Christina L Osborne under CP07-62-000, et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
8/20/2008
Accession No: 20080822-0039
Description:
Comments of Blair W Fleischmann re the the proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG
Terminal and Pipeline ProJect under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING; MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST
8/20/200
Accession No: 20080822-0041
Description:
Maryland Department of Planning submits comments on the draft Environmental Impact
Statement for the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62, el al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
8/25/200
20080825-5050
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC submits Updated General Conformity Analysis under
Individual No Affiliation
8/27/2008
20080827-5017
55
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
Description:
05/29/2009
Comment of Eric Newman m Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62 et al Submission Date:
8/27/2008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
8/29/2008
20080829-5033
Comment of Andrew Durkin under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
8/29/2008
Accession No: 20080908-0194
Description:
Office of the Under Secretary of Defense response to Ms. Lauren O'Donnelrs 3/13/08
letter regarding their draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and
Pipeline Project etc under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
9/2/2008
Accession No: 20080904-0532
Description:
Comments of Edward P. Fitts expressing concerns re Brandywine's Project under CP0762 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
61 et al
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
91212008
20080904-0533
Comments of Eric Newman re the AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's pipeline under CP07-
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91212008
Accession No: 20080904-0577
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their response to
the Data Request issued by the FERC on 8112108 under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/2/2008
20080904-0578
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their response to
the Data Request issued by the FERC on 8/12/08 under CP07-62 et al LARGE FORMATS ONLY,
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLCI MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/3/2008
Accession No: 20080903-4004
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD 1 of 2 - Volume I
containing its response to Data Request under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
91312008
Accession No: 20080903-4005
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC's CD 2 of 2 - Volume II
containing its response to Data Request under CP07-62 et el,
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/3/2008
Accession No: 20080904-0576
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits their response to
the Data Request issued by the FERC on 8112108 under CP07-82 et aL
Filed Date:
56
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Issued By:
EXTERNALAFFAIRS. OFFICE OF
Filed Date:
9/4/2008
Accession No: 20080911-0054
Description:
Response to Pennsylvania State Senator Andrew Dmniman's 7/14/08 et al letters re
Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp's Sentinel Expansion Project under CP08-31 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
9/101200
20080910-5085
AES supplemental response to COE 30 and LURP 44 under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62 et al
INDIVIDUAL
9/10/2008
20080911-0136
Comments of William Munton re proposed pipeline at the Brandywine watershed under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
9/11/2008
20080911-5005
Comment of Richard and Victoria S Channell under CP07-62-000, et. al.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
9112120O
Accession No: 20080912-4004
Descdptlon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing Volume I - information pertaining to
GEN 4, GEN 5, and GEN 14 of their response to FERC's 8112108 letter under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
91121200
Accession No: 20080912-4005
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing Volume II - information pertaining to
GEN 4, GEN 5, and GEN 14 of their response to FERC's 8/12108 letter under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlanttc Express, LLC
Filed Date:
91121200
Accession No: 20080912-5085
Description:
Weekly Status Report of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
in CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
SAINT ANNE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
Filed Date:
9/1212008
Accession No: 20080915-0170
Description:
Saint Anne Community Association submits comments re the proposed AES Mid-Atlantic
natural gas pipeline under CP07-62
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
91121200
Accession No: 20080915-0172
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC submits additional
information pertaining to GEN 4, GEN 5 and GEN 14 in response to the Data Request issued by the
FERC on 8/12/08 under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
91121200
57
20090603-0005
FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20080915-0173
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC submits additional
information pertaining to GEN 4. GEN 5 and GEN 14 in response to the Data Request issued by the
FERC on 8/12108 under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Afftliation
9/16/2008
20080916-5082
Comment of Susan T Barrett-Bullitt under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND,STATE OF
9/16/2008
Accession No: 20080922-0064
Description:
MarylandDepartment of Business & Economic Development submits comments on the
draft Environmental Impact Statement under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
9/19/200
Accession No: 20080919-4008
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's CD containing status update under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
9/191200
Accession No: 20080924-0084
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits an update on the status of AES consultation
since filing of their last update on 9/12/08 in response to FERC's 8/12/08 Data Request Comment etc
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
9/22/200
Accession No: 20080925-0074
Description:
Commentsof Rikki and Jesse D Saunders expressing concerns re Brandywine
Conservancy under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Maryland Waterfowlers Association
9/24/2008
Accession No: 20080924-5029
Description:
Commentsof Maryland Waterfowlers Association re FERC Filing of AES Sparrows Point
LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express under Docket(s): CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Little Britain Township,Lancaster County. PA
9/24/2008
Accession No: 20080924-5034
Description:
Commentsof Little Britain Township, Lancaster County, PA on the previously submitted
by USPS and not received under CP07-62, el. al..
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Little Britain Township,Lancaster County, PA
9/25/2008
Accession No: 20080925-0102
Description:
Little Britain Township submits comments re the proposed Mid-Atlantic Pipeline Project
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
912512008
Accession No: 20080929-0074
5g
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Comments of Rita A Conway re the construction of the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal
and Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline from Baltimore County, MD to Chester County, PA under CP07-62 et
al
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION, FERC
9/26/2008
Accession No: 20080926-3007
Description:
Notice of Avatlabihty of the Draft General Conformity Determination and notice of public
comment for the proposed Sparrows Point LNG Project re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under
CP07-62 et al,
Federal Register Citation: 73 FR 57346 Date: 10/2/2008
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
E N E R G YPROJECTS, OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION. FERC
9/26/200
Accession No: 20080926-4000
DescdpUon:
Draft General Conformity Determination for Maryland and Pennsylvania to assess the
potential air quality impacts associated with the construction & operation of Sparrows Point LNG Terminal
and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date;
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC. MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/26/200
Accession No: 20080926-4012
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing Volume I - 9/26/08 status update
under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC: MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/26/200
Accession No: 20080926-4013
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing Volume II - 9126108 status update
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/26/200
Accession No: 20081001-0065
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits an update of the status of AES's
consultations and activities since the filing of its last update on 9/19/08 under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC, MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
9/26/200
Accession No: 20081001-0066
DescripUon:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al submits an update of the status of AES's
consultations and activities since the filing of its last update on 9/19/08 under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
E N E R G YPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
9/29/2008
Accession No: 20080929-4000
Description:
Office of Energy Projects submits an e-mail to AES Sparrows Point requesting data for
the AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid Atlanhc Express Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: M,d-Atlantic Express, LLC
91291200
20080929-5129
AES comments on Maryland DBED letter under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL (NO DETAILED AFFILIATION GIVEN)
10/1/2008
59
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20081006-0077
Description:
Commentsof Rita A Conway re the Sparrows Point LNG terminal and the Mid-Atlantic
Express Pipeline under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
10/2/2008
Accession No: 20081002-5038
Description:
Reportof Upper Uwchlan Township comments regarding AES Sparrows Point project
under Docket No CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/3/200
Accession No: 20081003-5054
ENERGYPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
10/6/2008
Accession No: 20081006-3037
Description:
Letterto AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC's et al requesting that within 15 days the Council
advise of receipt of the letter whether or not they intend to participate in the process of resolving adverse
effects under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
10/6/2008
20081006-5054
Comment of Richard J and Victoria S Channell under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
ai
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/6/200
20081006-5088
Response to Data Request of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC, et. al. under CP07-62. et
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/6/200
20081006-5089
Response to Data Request of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC. et al. under CP07-62, et
Description:
al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
VIRGINIADEPARTMENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES
101812008
20081008-4002
Description:
Commonwealthof V=rginia Department of Historic Resources provides comments on the
Environmental Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP0762 et al
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
10/8/2008
Accession No: 20081008-5052
Description:
Commentsof Richard J. and Victoria S Channell re AES Sparrows Point Project under
CP07-62-000, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP. (PA)
10/8/2008
20081009-0084
60
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Descdptlon:
UpperUwchlan Township comments on the proposal for routing the gas pipeline through
the generally-central area of the Lakeridge WWTF disposal area etc re the AES Sparrows Point Project
under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Deacdption:
Individual No Affiliation
10/1012008
20081010-5003
Comment of Andrew Durkin under CP07-62-000 Route Variations 12a-c and 20b-d
Filed By:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
Filed Date:
1011012008
Accession No: 20081010-5089
Description:
AES Sparrows Point. LNG. et al, submits Data Request 6 status update for October 10.
2008 under CP07-62. et al_
Filed By:
BRANDYWINECONSERVANCY
Filed Date:
1011412008
Accession No: 20081014-5039
Description:
Commentsof BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY regarding the proposed pipeline's effect
on Conservancy-eased lands, under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
1011412008
Accession No: 20081017-0095
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG et al submits the revised Alignment Sheet 017 with a scale of 1
inch equals 200 feet under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
Filed Date:
1011412008
Accession No: 20081017-0096
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG et al submits the revised Alignment Sheet 017 with a scale of 1
inch equals 200 feet under CP07-62 et al. LARGE FORMATS ONLY
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62. et. al
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC, Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC
10/15/2008
20081015-5001
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC. et al submits its Draft Indiana Bat study design under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62 et al.
INDIVIDUAL
10/15/2008
20081020-0020
Comments of Rita A Conway of Brookhill Farms re Mid-Alantic Express Pipeline under
Filed By:
C H A D S E YDVELOPMENT SERVICES. LLC
Filed Date:
10/15/2008
Accession No: 20081021-0209
Description:
Comments of Chadsey Development Services, LLC re AES Sparrows point LNG, LNG et
a= under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC, Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/1612008
20081016-5049
AES Response to October 8, 2008 Comment Letter under CP07-62 et al
6]
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62, et al
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/1712008
20081017-5084
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC, et al submits October 17, 2008 status update under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
10/21/2008
20081021-5048
Comment of Richard J and Victoria S Channell under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; M=d-Atlanbc Express, LLC
10/2312008
20081023-5050
AES and VA FWS Correspondence in CP07-62. et al.
Filed By:
COAST GUARD, UNITED STATES
Filed Date:
10/2412008
Accession No: 20081024-4003
Description:
US Coast Guard informs FERC that the additional risk mitigation measures may require
the Coast Guard to establish a regulated navigation area for effective implementation and enforcement
etc under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
10/24/2008
20081024-5020
Comment of Andrew Durkin under CP07-62 Route Variations 12a-c and 20b-d
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/24/2008
20081024-5083
AES response to letter from Brandywine Conservancy in CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/24/2008
20081024-5089
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al Status update for October 24. 2008.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
10/27/2008
20081027-5031
Comment of Richard J and Victoria S Channell under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
10/27/2008
20081027-5032
Comments of Theresa R Gallagher under CP07-62, et ai
Filed By:
MARYLANDDEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
Filed Date:
10/27/2008
Accession No: 20081029-0266
Description:
Commentsof the Maryland Department of the Environment. Air and Radiation
Management Administration re Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
10/29/2008
62
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20081029-3045
Letter to property owners encouregmg them to become involved in the process and
provide their specific comments or concerns re Mid-Atlantic Express's proposal under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA
10/30/2008
20081030-5046
Comments of Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/31/2008
20081031-5021
October 31, 2008 weekly status update.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
10/31/2008
Accession No: 20081031-5022
Description:
October 31, 2008 weekly status update
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Acceeslon No:
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
Filed By:
Filed Oate:
Accession No:
Descdption:
Brandywine Conservancy EMC
11/3/200
20081103-5123
Comment of Brandywine Conservancy EMC under CP07-62-000, et, al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
11/3/200
20081103-5130
AES Comments on Draft General Federal Conformity Determination,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
20081105-0075
Comments of an individual re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
20081106-0127
Comments of Dorothy A Matz expressing concerns re proposed gas pipe facilities under
11/3/2008
20081103-4008
Description:
The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation acknowledges receipt of the notification &
supporting documentation regarding the adverse effects of the proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG
Project etc under CP07-62 et al.
CP07-62 et al
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
20081107-0019
Comments of Russell S Donnelly re Draft General Conformity Determination for the AES
Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
20081107-0110
63
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
Description:
et al
05/29/2009
Comments of Carolyn Jones expressing concerns with the AES Project under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0080
Description:
Commentsof Martha Straus re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic Express
LLC Project under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0081
Description:
Commentsof John Charles Ware re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic
Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0082
Descdption:
Commentsof Dems Newbold re AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid Atlantic Express
LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
20081125-0083
Description:
Commentsof Carolyn Jones re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic Express
LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0084
Description:
Commentsof Lisa Van Hounten re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic
Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0085
Description:
Commentsof Russel S Donnelly re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic
Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0086
Description:
Commentsof Linda M Howard re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and MJd Atlantic
Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0089
Description:
Commentsof Teri Digraz~o re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic Express
LLC Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
20081125-0090
Description:
Commentsof Individual re AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid Atlantic Express LLC
Project under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
64
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0091
Description:
Commentsof Blair Fleischmann re AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid Atlantic
Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
20081125-0092
Description:
Comments of D=xon Straud Jr re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic
Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al.
Accession No:
INDIVIDUAL
11/3/2008
20081125-0093
Comments of Melanie Hesse on to the Draft General Conformity Determination for the
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
S A F E T YAGRICULTURE,
,
VILLAGES AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
111312008
Accession No:
20081125-0094
Description:
Safety,Agriculture, Villages and Environment. Inc submits comments re the Draft
General Conformity Determination for the AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlant=c Express. LLC
under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
111312008
Accession No: 20081125-0095
Description:
Commentsof Diane Carliner re the Draft General Conformity Determination for the AES
Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
11/4/2008
Accession No: 20081104-5058
Description:
Commentof Edward A Dolor in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-63-000, CP07-62-000
Submission Date: 11/4/2008
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
111412008
Accession No: 20081106-0123
Description:
Commentsof Lisa Van Houten re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et
al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
M A R Y L A N DHOUSE OF DELEGATES
11/4/2008
Accession No: 20081106-0125
Description:
JosephJ Minnick, The Maryland House of Delegates submits Comments and Formal
Requests pursuant to the Draft General Conformity Determination for the AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC
and Mid Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
US Environmental Protection Agency
111412008
Accession No: 20081107-0106
65
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial
05/29/2009
Description:
The US Environmental Protect=onAgency submits Comments on Draft General
Conformity Determination re Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et
al
Filed Date:
11/4/2008
20081125-0044
Description:
MarylandHouse of Delegates Joseph J Mmmck submits comments and formal request
pursuant to the Draft General Conformity Determination for the AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under
CP07-62 et al.
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/5/2008
Accession No: 20081107-0113
Description:
Commentspursuant to the Draft General Conformity Determination re AES Sparrows
Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlandtic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
11/5/2008
20081107-0114
Comments of Linda M Howard expressing concerns with the AES Project under CP07-62
et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
COLORADO DIVISION OF WILDLIFE
11/5/2008
20081107-0119 NOTE This document =s not part of this docketJsub docket.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
SAFETY.AGRICULTURE. VILLAGES AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
11/6/2008
Accession No: 20081107-0093
Description:
Commentsof Safety, Agriculture, Villages and Environment, Inc re Draft General
Conformity for the AES sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
PENNSYLVANIA,STATE OF
11/6/2008
Accession No: 20081107-0096
Description:
Commentsof Pennsyslvania Senator Andrew E Dinniman expressing concerns re the
AES Sparrows Point Gas Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
PENNSYLVANIA,STATE OF
11/6/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0054
Description:
Commentsof Pennsylvama State Senator Andrew E Dinniman re AES Sparrows Point
Gas Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
T U R N E RSTATION CONSERVATION TEAMS. INC
11/6/2008
20081125-0087
Description:
Commentsof Turner Station Conservation Team, Inc re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC
and Mid Atlantic Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
ENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT CENTER
11/6/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0088
Description:
EnwronmentalManagement Center submits comments re AES Sparrows Point LNG.
LLC and Mid Atlantic Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
66
2 0 0 9 0 6 0 3 - 0 0 0 5 FERC PDF
(Unofficial) 05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Ind=vidualNo Affiliation
11/7/2008
Accession No: 20081107-5034
Description:
Comment of Oliver C Inslee. ESQ in Docket(s)/ProJect(s) CP07-62 et al. Submission
Date: 11/7/2008
Individual No Affiliation
11/7/2008
20081107-5035
Description:
Comments of Richard J and Victoria S Channell regarding Variation 12C for the AES
Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62, et. al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Acceseion No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC
11/7/200
Accession No: 20081107-5070
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC, et al submits the Weekly Status Update for November
7, 2008 under CP07-62, et. al.
Filed By:
COUNTY COUNCIL OF HARTFORD COUNTY, MARYLAND
Filed Date:
11/7/2008
Acceeeton No: 20081113-0152
Description:
County County of Hartford County, Maryland provides comments on the proposed M=dAtlantic Express Liquefied Natural Gas Pipeline through rural Hartford County, Maryland under CP07-62
et al.
Filed By:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
Filed Date:
11/10/2008
Accession No: 20081110-5140
Description:
RESPONSE OF AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC AND MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS,
LLC TO THE COMMENTS OF THE BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY AND OTHERS ON THE DRAFT
GENERAL FEDERAL CONFORMITY DETERMINATION, CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
11/10/2008
20081113-0023
Comments of Walter W Simcox et al re Mid-Atlantic Express Pipehne Project under
CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
Individual No Affiliation
11/12/2008
Accession No: 20081112-5007
Descdption:
Comments of Michael G and Bonnie Harrington in opposition to variation 6B of the
proposed natural gas pipeline by Mid-Atlantic Express, L L C in Harford County, Maryland under CP0762, et. al
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
Individual No Affiliation
1111212008
Accession No: 20081112-5051
Description:
Comments of Bruce R Breton. Sr. in opposition to Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project
Route 6B variation under CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
TURNER STATION CONSERVATION TEAMS, INC.
1111212008
Accession No: 20081113-0021
Oeecription:
Turner Station Conservation Teams, tnc submits comments re AES Sparrows Point LNG,
LLC et al under CP07-62 et al,
67
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
Filed By:
Filed Date:
05/29/2009
DOWNINGFORGE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION
11/13/2008
20081117-0079
Description:
DowningForge Home Owners Association submits comments re variation 10A. Figure
3.3 3-9A under CP07-62 et al.
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62 et al,
INDIVIDUAL
11/13/2008
20081125-0113
Comments of Joseph KennJsh re The Kirks Mill Variation A pipe line proposal under
Filed By:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC: Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
11/14/2008
Filed Date:
Accession NO: 20081114-5112
Description:
Weekly status update for November 14, 2008 of AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC, et al in
CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC: Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
11/14/2008
20081114-5113
Weekly status update for November 14. 2008 of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC, et al in
CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
11/14/2008
20081117-0075
Comments of Mark Halhwell re AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/14/2008
Accession No: 20081117-0076
Description:
Commentsof Thomas R McQueen et al re FERC's 10/29/08 letter concerning variations
of the originally proposed pipeline route crossing property in Upper Oxford Township, Chester County, PA
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
62 et al
INDIVIDUAL
11/14/2008
20081121-0137
Comments of Kelly and Leah Jubb re Mid Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-
Filed By:
Filed Date:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONEMTNAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 10
11/14/2008
Accession No: 20081125-0079
Description:
UmtedStates Evironmental Protection Agency informs FERC that they had received 15
letters inadvertently addressed to Regional Admin+ Donald Welsh re a Comment and Formal request
under CP07~2 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No A~hat~on
11/17/2008
20081117-5046
Comments of Kenneth L Steiner in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-62 Submission Date:
11/1712008
68
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation; UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, (PA)
11/17/2008
20081117-5075
Supplemental Information of Upper Uwchlan Township under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
11/17/2008
20081119-0027
Comments of Sylvia Edwards re gas lines under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
11/1712008
Accession No: 20081119-0030
Description:
Commentsof individuals re proposed variation 6B of the Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline
Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
a,
INDIVIDUAL
11/17/2008
20081119-0031
Comments of Mark Halliwell re Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
1111712008
Accession No: 20081119-0311
Description:
Comments of Nancy and Cliff Pollack expressing concerns re the Mid-Atlantic Express
p,peline proposal under CP07-62 et al
The Hankin Group
11/1812008
20081118-5005
Description:
Comments of The Hankin Group re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's Route Variation 12C
under CP07-62, et. al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
11/1812008
Accession No: 20081118-5076
Description:
Comment of Carrie Whiteside under CP07-63-000, CP07-62-000 to oppose Variation 13
as outlined in Figure 3 3.3.-16 Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
1111812008
Accession No; 20081121-0027
Description:
Kathleenand George Marker provides comments on the the proposed alternate route
above ES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al gas line etc under CP07--62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
11/18/2008
Accession No: 20081204-0029
Description:
US Representative Joseph Pitts on behalf of his constituent providing comments re
Sparrows Point LNG and Pipeline Project under CP07-63 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
11/19/2008
Accession No: 20081119-5027
Description:
Commentsof Matthew J Helak regarding the proposed LNG Pipeline Project under
CP07-62, et al.
69
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
11/19/2008
20081119-5075
Comment of Bentley Systems, Inc in CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
11/1912008
20081119-5115
Comment of Glenn A Doering, JR under CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
Filed Date:
11/1912008
Accession No: 20081119-5133
Description:
AES Response to FERC Request for Clarification under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
11/19/2008
Accession No: 20081121-0030
Description:
Letter to FERC discussing object=ons to the proposed variation 6B of the Mid Atlantic
Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
11/1912008
Accession No: 20081121-0034
Description:
Commentsof Peter Kahl expressing concerns re the Mid-Atlantic Express P=peline
Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Acceeelon No:
Description:
Individual No Affihation
1112012008
20081120-5013
Comments of Theresa R Gallagher re AES Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Ind=vidual
No Affiliation
Filed Date:
11/20/2008
Accession No: 20081120-5015
Description:
Comments of Richard J and Victoria S Channell re AES Sparrows Point Prolect under
CP07-62. et al.
Filed By:
tndiv=dual
No Affiliation
Filed Date:
11/20/2008
Accession No: 20081120-5016
Description:
Commentsof Lisa J Gallick re AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express,
LLC's proposed LNG pipeline project under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
indivfdualNo Affiliation
Filed Date:
11/20/2008
Accession No: 20081120-5026
Description:
Commentof Eric Newman in Docket(s)/Project(s) CP07-63-000. CP07-64-000. CP07-65000. CP07-62-000 Submission Date: 11/20/2008
Filed By:
IndiwdualNo Affihation
Filed Date:
1112012008
Accession No: 20081120-5031
Description:
Commentsof Eric J Newman regarding Re-route option 12(C] under CP07-62, et. at.,
70
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Issued By:
OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
Filed Date:
Accession No:
11/20/2008
20081202-0133
Description:
Response to Maryland House of Delegates Joseph Minnick 10/31/08 letter regarding the
AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
issued By:
OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
1112012008
Accession No: 20081202-0138
Description:
Response to Pennsylvania State Senate Andrew Dinniman 10/31/08 letter regarding the
AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed D a t e :
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62, st. al.
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; M,d-Atlantic Express, LLC
11/21/2008
2008112t-5022
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's weekly status update for November 21, 2008 under
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
1112112008
Accession No: 20081126-0001
Description:
Cheryl Hertzog of Bentley Systems, Inc submits comments re AES Sparrows Point LNG,
LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
1112112008
20081126-0005
Comments of Ralph J Wittrealternate route forpr~ectunder CP07-62 etal
Filed By:
COUNTY COUNCIL OF HARTFORD COUNTY, MARYLAND
Filed Date:
Accession No:
1112412008
20081126-0011
Description:
County Council of Harrord County, Maryland submits comments re AES Sparrows Point
LNG, LLC's et al LNG pipeline under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Individual No Affiliation
11/26/2008
20081126-5002
Description:
Comments of Susan T Barrett-Bullitt re AES Sparrows Point]Mid Atlantic Express
Pipeline under CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
individual No Affiliation
1112612008
Accession No: 20081126-5075
Description:
Comments of Andrew Durkin Regarding Route Variation 12C of AES Sparrow Point
Project under CP07-62
issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
12/1/2008
20081201-3009
Description:
Notice of revised schedule for environmental rev,ew for AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's
et al proposed Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Individual No Affiliation
12/1/2008
20081201-5008
7]
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
(doc-less)Mobon to Intervene of Tim McAleese under CP07-62. et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA
12/2/2008
20081202-5092
Motion to Intervene of Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
et al
Individual No Affiliation
12/3/2008
20081203-5004
(doc-less) Motion to Intervene of Brian Fenimore and Suzanne Fenimore under CP07-62,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
12/3/2008
20081203-5088
Motion to Intervene of John Schmidt under CP07-62-000
Filed By:
Filed Date:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. UNITED STATES
12/3/2008
Accession No: 20081222-0222
Description:
US Representative CA Dutch Ruppersberger submits comments re Mid-Atlantic Express,
LLC's proposed natural gas pipeline under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
12~/2008
20081204-5044
(doc-less) Motlontolntervene ofLaune B. Abele under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Individual No Affiliation
12/4/2008
20081204-5046
(doc-less) Motion to Intervene of Jeffery and Christine Samset under CP07-62
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
12/4/2008
20081204-5119
Comment of Steve McNaughton under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
12/4/2008
20081208-0573
Description:
Commentsof Edward A Day re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlanhc Express,
LLC's proposed natural gas pipline expansion under CP07-62 et al
Filed D a t e :
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
COUNTY COUNCIL OF HARFORD COUNTY
12/4/2008
20081208-0574
County Council of Harford County MD submits comments re AES LNG p~peline under
CP07-62 et al.
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY, FERC
12/5/2008
20081205-3000
72
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Notice of availability of the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed
Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP0762 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
al
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
121512008
20081205-4000
Final Environmental Impact Statement re Sparrows Point LNG Projetc under CP07-62 et
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY
12/5/2008
20081205-5002
Motion to Intervene of BRANDYWINE CONSERVANCY under CP07-62, et. al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Individual No Affiliation
12/5/2008
Accession No: 20081205-5020
Description:
Motion to Intervene of Dorothy A Matz. Emory A Hamilton, Dr William Munton, Susan
and Roger Mustalish, Dr. William and Helen Elkins, Diana Wister, Edward Fitts, William M W and
Elizabeth Sharp, Rikki & Jesse Saunders, et al under CP07-62-000. et al
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
Individual No Affiliation
121512008
Accession No: 20081205-5021
Description:
Motion for Acceptance of Intervention Status for Jeffrey Samsel and Christine Samsel
under CP07-62-000.
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: M~d-Atlantic Express, LLC
12/5/200
Accession No: 20081205-5111
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's Weekly Status Update for December 5, 2008 under
CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
12/9/2008
20081209-5023
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Andrew Durkin and Ann Durkin under CP07-62, et
a=,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
12/10/2008
Accession No: 20081212-0057
Description:
Comments of Timothy and Maureen McAleese re the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the proposed AES/Mid Atlantic Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
12/10/2008
Accession No: 20081222-0212
Description:
Response to Joseph Pitts 11/18/08 letter replying to concerns of Mr. and Mrs Thomas
McQueen re Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Individual No Affiliation
12/11/2008
20081211-5024
?3
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Commentsof Andrew Durkin regarding Variation 12a and the proposal of a route
variation for the Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62. et. al..
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Statement and
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA
12/15/2008
20081215-5012
Comments of Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA on Final Environmental Impact
request to extend Public Comment Period of FEIS under CP07-62, et. a l
INDIVIDUAL
12/15/2008
20081218-0079
Comments ofCady A Jonesre AES Sparrows PointLNG. LLC etalunder CP07~2 e t a l
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
12/15/2008
Accession No: 20081218-0080
Description:
Carolyn Mroz requests an extention of time of 60 clays but preferably 90 days or longer to
submit comments on the FERC FEIS for the proposed AES project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
12/15/2008
Accession No: 20081218-0085
Description:
BradfordGlen HOA request for a minimum 90 day extension of time to comment on the
FEIS for the Mid- Atlantic Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
Filed Date:
12/15/2008
Accession No: 20081218-0088
Description:
LNG Opposition Team submits comments re the Final Environmental Impact Statement
for AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express LLC Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
PA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
Filed Date:
12/15/2008
Accession No: 20081219-0073
Description:
PA Environmental Council requests that Gwyn Rowland be removed from the mailing list
re AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
Filed Date:
12/15/2008
Accession No: 20081222-0233
Description:
Responseto US Representahve CA Dutch Ruppersberger's 11/20/08 letter forwarding
concerns of Bruce Breton with the Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC's proposed Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline
Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No AffiJiation
12/16/2008
20081216-5042
Motiontolnte~ene of West Bradford Township under CP07-62-000. et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
12/16/2008
Accession No: 20081219-0005
Description:
Commentsof Joan Deen re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express.
LLC under CP07-62 el al
?4
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
12/16/2008
20081219-0007
Comments of Mellisa M Henderson re Final Environmental Impact Statement for the
proposed AES/Mid-Atlantic Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
1211612008
Accession No: 20081219-0070
Description:
Commentsof David and Dawn Cassel re the FERC Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the proposed AES/Mid- Atlantic Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
12/17/2008
20081217-0039
Comments of Individual re FERC Final Env,ronmental Impact Statement for the prposeq
AES/Mid-Atlantic Pipeline ProJect under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
12/17/2008
20081217-5016
Motion to Intervene of Uwchlan Township, Chester County Pennsylvania under CP07-62,
et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC: Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
12/17/2008
20081217-5073
AES update
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
12/18/2008
Accession No: 20081222-0057
Description:
RonaldL Henry request an extension of the Public Comment Period pursuant to FERC's
F,nal Environmental Impact Statement under CP07-82 et al
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
12/18/2008
20081222-0058
KathyS Sweat request an extension of the Public Comment Period pursuant to FERC's
F,nal Environmental Impact Statement under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
12/19/2008
20081219-5026
Motion to Intervene of Upper Uwchlan Township under CP07-62, et. al.
Filed By:
S A F E T YAGRICULTURE,
,
VILLAGES AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.
12/19/2008
20081230-0022
Safety,Agriculture, Villages and Environment, Inc requests an extension of 90 days to
provide public comments on the Environmental Impact Statement proposed for the AES Project under
CP07-62 et al,
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Individual No Affiliation
12/22/2008
20081222-5028
?5
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
Description:
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Motion/Notice of Intervention David and Dawn Cassel under CP07-62
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
12/22/2008
Accession No: 20081230-0019
Description:
Commentsof Tracey and John Clark expressmg concerns re the Final Draft
Enwronmental Impact Statement re AES/Mid-Atlantic Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
12/22/2008
Accession No: 20081230-0020
Description:
Commentsof Gwendolyn Layton re Final Environmental Impact Statement for AES
Sparrows Point, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
INDIVIDUAL
Filed Date:
12/22/2008
Accession No: 20081230-0024
Description:
Commentsof Ann C & H Robert Solway re the Final Environmental Impact Statement for
the AES ProJect under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
IndividualNo Affiliation
Filed Date:
12/23/2008
Accession No: 20081223-5063
Description:
Commentof Uwchlan Townsh@ re: FEIS for the Proposed AES/M~d-Atlantic Express
under CP07-62-000. et el.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
al
Individual No Affiliation
12/24/2008
20081224-5041
Comment of Upper Uwchlan Township re: AES Sparrows Point project under CP07-62 at
INDIVIDUAL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
12/24/2008
Accession No: 20081230-0023
Comments of Freda Ulman re AES Project under CP07-62 et al.
Description:
Filed By:
PENNSYLVANIA,STATE OF
Filed Date:
12/29/2008
Accession No: 20090108-0118
Description:
PennsylvaniaRepresentative Bryan Cutler submits comments re proposed pipeline
project for the AES MidAtlanticExpress under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
ENERGYPROJECTS, OFFICE OF
Filed Date:
12/30/2008
Accession No: 20081230-3016
Description:
Letterproviding Maryland H~storicalTrust et at with the Programmatic Agreement and
requesting comments no later than 30 days under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
Filed Date:
12/31/2008
Accession No: 20090105-0201
Description:
AES Sparrows request an extension of ttme to review the Environmental Impact
Statement submitted by FERC under CP07-62
Filed By:
IndividualNo Affiliation
76
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
Filed Date:
Accession No:
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
1/2/2009
20090102-5008
Commentsof Tim McAleese requesting reconsideration of alternate route 9A under
Description:
CP07-62, et al,
Filed By:
BRANDYWINECONSERVANCY
Filed Date:
11212009
Accession No: 20090102-5041
Description:
Commentsof Brandy Conservancy regarding Final Environmental Impact Statement on
the Sparrow Point LNG Project under CP07-62, et al_
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen HOA
1/2/2009
Accession No: 20090102-5050
Description:
Comments,Supplemental Information, Requests of Victoria Crossing at Bradford Glen
HOA pursuant to the FERC Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/5/2009
20090105-5004
(doc-less) Motion to Intervene of Mehssa M Henderson under CP07-62.
Individual No Affiliation
1/5/2009
20090105-5005
Comments on Kirks Mills variation A andrequest for extended comment period of Susan
T Barrett-Bullitt under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
BRANDYWINECONSERVANCY
1/5/2009
Accession No: 20090105-5008
Description:
Comments of Brandywine Conservancy regarding Final Environmental Impact Statement
on the Sparrow Point LNG Project under CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Individual No Affiliation
1/5/2009
Accession No: 20090105-5018
Description:
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Steve McNaughton and Joanne McNaughton under
CP07-62, et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
a.
Individual No Affiiiation
1/5/2009
20090105-5052
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Richard J and Victoria S Channell under CP07-62, et
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/5/2009
20090105-5069
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Carolyn A March under CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CHESTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PA
1/5/2009
Accession No: 20090105-5074
Description:
Comment Time Extension Request of CHESTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PA
under CP07-65, et al
7?
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/5/2009
20090105-5081
Motion to Intervene of Matthew J & Deborah W Helak under CP07-62, et
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
INDIVIDUAL
1/5/2009
20090108-0092
Comments of Ed Fitts re Environmental Impact Statement under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
1/5/2009
20090108-0114 NOTE This document is not part of this docketJsub docket,
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
Filed Date:
11512009
Accession No: 20090108-0114
Description:
Responseto US Senator Aden Specter's 12/18/08 letter re AES Sparrows Point LNG
Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
Filed Date:
1/5/2009
Accession No; 20090108-0115
Description:
Responseto US Representative Jim Gerlach's 12/18/08 letter re AEs sparrows Point
LNG Project under CP07~2 et aL
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
Filed Date:
11512009
Accession No: 20090108-0116
Description:
Letterinforming Robert P Casey Jr that FERC has not made a decision re AES
Sparrows Point LNG Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
Filed Date:
11512009
Accession No: 20090108-0117
Description:
Responseto US Representative Jeseph R Pitts's 12/18/06 letter re AEs sparrows Point
LNG Project under CP07-62 el al
Filed By:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Filed Date:
11612009
Accession No: 20090106-4007
Description:
The US Army Corps of Engineers provides comments on FERC's December 2008 final
Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express
Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
JndJvJdual No Affiliation
1/6/2009
20090106-5002
Motion to Intervene of Steven and Joanne McNaughton under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/6/2009
20090106-5008
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Crista Ford under CP07-62-000, et al
Filed By:
Individual No Affiliation
78
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
1/6/2009
20090106-5009
Motion to Intervene Out-of-T~me of Edmund F and Crista A. Ford under CP07-64, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/6/2009
20090106-5019
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Michael P Hade under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
U S Department of the Interior
1/6/2009
Accession No: 20090106-5071
Descdptlon:
U,S. Department of the Interior comments on FEIS for the Proposed Sparrows Point LNG
Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
1/6/2009
Accession No: 20090109-0062
Description:
Silvio and Ten Dignazio requests an extension of time to comment on the FEIS for the
proposed AES/Mid-Atlantic P=peline Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
UPPER UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP. (PA)
1/6/2009
Accession No: 20090109-0063
Description:
Upper Uwchlan Township informs FERC that they have no preference among the routes
being considered for the pipeline re Lakeridge Wasterwater Treatment Facility under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
WEST MARLBOROUGH TOWNSHIP
1/7/2009
Accession No: 20090109-0128
Descdption:
West Marlborough Township submits a motion to intervene re Sparrows Point LNG, LLC
and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
PENNSYLVANIABUREAU OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
1/8/2009
Accession No: 20090108-4014
Description:
Pennsylvania Bureau for Historic Preservation provides comments on the draft
Programmatic Agreement for AES Sparrows Point Liquid Natural Gas Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et
al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
1/8/2009
Accession No: 20090108-5032
Descdption:
Motionfor Acceptance of Intervention Status of Sean T Sweeney and Margaret Sweeney
under CP07-62, et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
S E N A T E UNITED
,
STATES
1/9/2009
Accession No: 20090109-0124
Descdption:
US Senator Aden Specter submits request for a thirty day extension to provide Public
Comments on the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed AES/Mid-Atlantic Pipeline
Project under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
INDIVIDUAL
1/9/2009
Accession No: 20090113-0284
?9
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Commentsof William Munton re Environmental Impact Statement under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
East Fallowfield Township
1/12/2009
20090112-5079
Motion to Intervene of East Fallowfield Township under CP07-62-000, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/12/2009
20090112-5084
Comment of Jerry Havens under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
111212009
20090112-5153
Comments from the National Oceanic and Atmosphenc Administration under CP07-62
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CP07-62, et al.
M a r y l a n dDepartment of Natural Resources
111312009
20090113-5099
Commentsof the State of Maryland on the AES Sparrows Point LNG Project FEIS under
BRANDYWINECONSERVANCY
1/13/2009
20090116-0174
Description:
Brandywine Conservancy requests that FERC extend the comment period for the Final
Environmental Impact Statement to 90 days etc re AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC et al under CP07-62 et
al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
CONGRESSOF THE UNITED STATES
111312009
20090128-0141
Description:
Commentsof Dutch Ruppereberger expressing concerns re the Liquefied Natural Gas
Project at Sparrows Point. Maryland under CP07-62 et al.
Filed Date:
Accession No:
COMMONWEALTHOF PENNSYLVANIA
111312009
20090202-0552
Description:
Commonwealthof Pennsylvania forwards comments concerning the implementation of
Variation 10A re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
SAVE.
1/14/2009
20090114-5020
Motion to Intervene of S A V E . under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Descdption:
Londonderry Township
111412009
20090114-5069
(doc-less) Motion to Intervene of Londonderry Township under CP07-62
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
1/15/2009
20090115-3062
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
80
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
News - FERC Approves AES Sparrows Point LNG Terminal, Mid-Atlantic Express
Pipeline under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION, FERC COMMISSIONERS & IMMEDIATE STAFF
(THE COMMISSION)
Filed Date:
11151200
Accession No:
Description:
20090115-3095
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
MARYLAND
WATERFOWLERS ASSOCIATION
1/15/2009
Order granting authority under Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act and issuing certificates
under Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al.
Commissioner Wellinghoff dissenting
20090115-4000
Description:
Commentsof Maryland Waterfowlers Association on the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the Proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ADVISORY COUNCIL ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION
111512009
20090115-4001
Description:
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation requests that FERC inform them of the status
of the Section 108 consultation re expressed concerns about the proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG
Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
COMMISSIONERS& IMMEDIATE STAFF (THE COMMISSION)
111512009
20090115-4010
Description:
News Release - Statement of Commqssioner Jon Wellinghoff on AES Sparrows Point
LNG Terminal & Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline re Item C-1 under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Indiwdual No Affrliation
111612009
20090116-5010
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Nancy J Pollack under CP07-62, et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/16/2009
20090116-5014
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Jill A Holly under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
111612009
20090116-5015
Motion to Intervene Out-of-Time of Lisa J Galhck under CP07-62, et al.
SAFETY, AGRICULTURE. VILLAGES AND ENVIRONMENT, INC
1/16/2009
20090123-0228
Safety, Agriculture Villages and Environment, Inc submits comments on the AES gas
p~peline project proposed to run from a new LNG terminal in Sparrows Point, MD under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
C H A I RAND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
1/16/2009
20090130-0110
Description:
Responseto US Representative CA. Dutch Ruppersberger's 1113109 letter re the AES
Sparrows Point LNG Project under CP07-62
8]
20090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
1/16/2009
Accession No: 20090130-0111
Description:
Response to US Representative Ehjah Cummings' 1/13/09 letter re the AES Sparrows
Point LNG Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
1/16/2009
Accession No: 20090130-0112
Description:
Response to US Senator John Sabanes' 1/13/09 letter re the AES Sparrows Point LNG
Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
1/16/2009
Accession No: 20090130-0113
Description:
Response to US Senator Benjamin Cardin's 1/13/09 letter re the AES Sparrows Point
LNG Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Issued By:
CHAIR AND IMMEDIATE STAFF (CHAIR)
1/16/2009
Accession No: 20090130-0114
Description:
Response to US Senator Barbara Mikulski's 1/13/09 letter re the AES Sparrows Point
LNG Project under CP07-62
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/20/2009
20090120-5107
Motion to Intervene of Dodie S Preston under CP07-62, et. al
Individual No Affiliation
112112009
Accession No: 20090121-5043
Request for Review of Susan T Barrett-Bullitt under CP07-62, et al.
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
1/21/2009
Accession No: 20090123-0229
Description:
LNG Opposition Team submits comments on AES Sparrows Point LNG Import Terminal
and Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline's Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
1/21/2009
Accession No: 20090123-0230
Description:
LNG Opposition Team submits comments on AES Sparrows Point LNG Import Terminal
and Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline's Sparrows Point Project under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
1/21/2009
Accession No: 20090126-0254
Description:
US Corps of Engineers submits comments on the 2008 Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the proposed AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under
CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
DOWNING FORGE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION
1/21/2009
82
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
20090203-0229
DowningForge Hone Owners Association submits comments re Variation 10A Figure
3 33-9A and associated text under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
al
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
1/22/200
20090122-5117
Comments of AES Sparrows Point on Draft Programmatic Agreement under CP07-62, et
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
DescripUon:
SECRETARY OF THE COMMISSION, FERC
1/23/2009
20090123-3044
Errata Notice re AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC et al under CP07-62 et al,
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
1/26/2009
20090126-5020
Comments of John Schmidt under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
COUNTY OF CHESTER
1/26/2009
20090127-0175
Countyof Chester, PA submits comments on the Final Environmental Impact Statement
for the proposed Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
N E W L I NTOWNSHIP
1/28/2009
20090202-0370
Motionto Intevene of Township of Newlin re a Request for Extension of Public Comment
Period for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipetine
Project under CP07-62. et aL
Filed By:
COMMONWEALTHOF PENNSYLVANIA
1/28/2009
Accession No: 20090209-0095
Description:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania forwards Downing Forge Owners Associahon 1/9/09
letter providing comments on Variation 10A under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Issued By:
O F F I C EOF ENERGY MARKET REGULATION
1/28/2009
Accession No: 20090217-0098
Description:
Letter to Pennsylvania House of Representative Bryan Cutler's 12/10/08 letter re AES
Sparrows Point LNG Project and concerns about Kirks Mill Variation A. described in the final
Environmental Impact Statement under CP07-62 et al
Filed Date:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2/6/2009
20090206-4002
The US Army Corps of EngJneers provides comments on AES Sparrows Point LNG &
Mid-Atlantic Express LLC's application for a permit to construct a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal etc
under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
ENERGY PROJECTS. OFFICE OF
2/9/2009
20090209-4005
83
20090603-0005 FERC PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Summary of the 1/30/09 minutes of meeting re AES Sparrows Point Project - Conformity
Analysis for Maryland under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
ENERGY PROJECTS. OFFICE OF
21912009
20090209-4006
Summary of the 2/3/09 minutes of meehng re AES Sparrows Point Project - Conformity
Analysis for Maryland under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
CHESTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PA
2/10/2009
20090210-5033
Motion to Intervene of CHESTER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, PA under CP07-62, et
al
Filed By:
Maryland
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Power Plant Research Program-Maryland Department of Natural Resources: State of
2/13/200
20090213-5081
State of Maryland Request for Rehearing under CP07-62. et al
Van Houten, Lisa; Bradford Glen Homeowners Association
2/13/200
20090213-5162
Request to Update Information of Van Houten, Lisa. et al. under CP07-62 et al
OFFICE OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS
2/13/2009
Accession No: 20090224-0071
Descdption:
Letter to the Honorable Curt Schroder re the AES Sparrows Po=nt Liquefied National Gas
Terminal and Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2/17/2009
20090217-4001
US Army Corps of Engineers updates FERC re status of review of the proposed AES
Sparrows Point LNG & Mid-Atlantic Express Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accesaion No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
LNG OPPOSITION TEAM
2/17/2009
20090218-0172 NOTE: This document is not part of this docket/sub docket
Filed By:
IndlvJdual No Affiliation
Filed Date:
2/17/2009
Accession No: 20090218-5001
Description:
Request for Rehearing of Dodie S Preston under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC
2/19/2009
20090223-0030
E-Mail dated 2/19/09 providing confirmation of receipt re AES Sparrows Pomg LNG, LLC
under CP07-62
Issued By:
ENERGY PROJECTS, OFFICE OF
Filed Date:
2/23/2009
Accession No: 20090223-3011
~4
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Description:
Letter order granting AES Sparrows Point LNG et al request for an extension of time until
4,'6/09 to complete their review re permits of the AES Sparrows Point LNG et al Project under CP07-62 et
a
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC
2/25/200
Accession No: 20090225-5122
Deecdptton:
UpdatedInformation Regarding ERC Availability of NOx and VOC emissions of AES
Sparrows Point LNG, LLC in CP07-63, et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
James B Griffin, P C
2/26/2009
20090226-5008
Motion to Intervene of the Oscar F Senn Trust filed by James B Griffin, P C under
CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2/27/2009
Accession No: 20090227-4000
Description:
Corps of Engineers subm,ts response to AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's request for an
extension of FERC's schedule for the Department of Army permit decision for the pipeline project under
CP07-62 et al
Issued By:
Filed Date:
FERC
2/27/2009
Accession No: 20090227-4008
Description:
Minutesof Teleconference Meeting re AES Sparrows Point Project - Conformity Analysis
for Maryland under CP07-62 et al.
Description:
Cain Township
212712009
20090227-5005
Motion to Intervene of Cain Township under CP07-63, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC
3/5/2009
20090305-5040
AES Response to NOAA Comments in CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express. LLC
31512009
20090305-5041
AES Response to NOAA Comments in CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
3/6/2O09
20090306-5052
Comment of Richard J and Victoria S Channell under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
PENNSYLVANIADEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
31612009
Accession No: 20090310-0036
Description:
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection submits requests for
additional time beyond 90 days to thoroughly rev,ew apps for Water Quality Certification under Section
401 re the Mid- Atlantic Express Pipeline Projects under CP07-62 et aL
85
20090603-0005 F E R C P D F
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
3/10/200
Accession No: 20090310-4005
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC's et al CD containing response to the 2/6/09 US Corps of
Engineers letter requesting elaboration for the permit decision under CP07-62 et al.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS, LLC
3/10/200
Accession No: 20090310-4006
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC's et al CD containing response to the 216109 US Corps of
Engineers letter requesting elaboration for the permit decision under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG. LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
3/10/200
Accession No: 20090313-0092
Description: AES Sparrows Point LNG LLC et al responds to the 2/6/09 US Corps of Engineers letter
requesting elaboration for the permit decision under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES SPARROWS POINT LNG, LLC; MID-ATLANTIC EXPRESS. LLC
3/10/200
Accession No: 20090313-0093
Description:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC el al responds to the 2/6/09 US Corps of Engineers letter
requesting elaboration for the permit decision under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Individual No Affiliation
3/13/2009
20090313-5016
Comment of Andrew Durkin under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
COAST GUARD= UNITED STATES
3/18/200
Accession No: 20090318-4002
Description:
The United States Coast Guard provides letter of recommendation in response to letter of
Intent by AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC on 313109 to transport liquefied natural gas to a proposed LNG
facility etc under CP07-62
Filed By:
Filed Date:
PENNSYLVANIABUREAU OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION
3/19/2009
Accession No: 20090323-0006
Description:
Pennsylvania Bureau of Historic Preservation reports that they are in recetpt of the draft
Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Sparrow Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project
under CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE. UNITED STATES
3/20/2009
Accession No: 20090323-0019
Deecdption:
The US Fish and Wildlife Service submits comments re Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the proposed Sparrows Point LNG Terminal and Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et el.
Filed By:
Filed Date:
IndividualNo Affiliation
3/23/2009
Accession No: 20090323-5099
Description:
Commentsand Rebuttal of Request for Rehearing filing Accession 0090313-5016 and
comment in Accession 20090217-5199, by Andrew Durkin. under CP07-60 et al.
Filed By:
DEPARTMENT
OF THE ARMY
86
t0090603-0005
FERC
PDF
(Unofficial)
05/29/2009
Filed Date:
3/25/2009
20090325-4004
Letter from the Department of the Army discussing the Permit Application for the AES
Sparrows Point LNG & Mid Atlantic Express LLC Dredging & Pipeline Project under CP07-62 et al
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed D a t e :
PENNSYLVANIA FEDERATION OF SPORTSMENS CLUBS
312512009
Accession No: 20090326-0143
Description:
Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission submits comments re the Secondary Species
Impact Review and Bog Turtle Survey under CP07-62
Filed By:
AES Sparrows Point LNG. LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
3/31/200
20090331-5154
Motion for Leave to Answer and Answer of AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC and MidAtlantic Express, L.L C. to Requests for Rehearing under CP07-62-000, et al
Filed Date:
Accession No:
Description:
Filed By:
Filed Date:
ExxonMobil Gas & Power Marketing Company. a division of Exxon
3/31/2009
Accession No: 20090331-5223
Description:
Change ~n Service List of ExxonMobil Gas & Power Marketing Company, a division of
Exxon Mobil Corporation under CP07-62. et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
AES Sparrows Point LNG, LLC; Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
41112009
Accession No: 20090401-5076
Descdption:
Response of AES to EPA Comments on Draft General Federal Conformity Determination
in CP07-62 et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Individual No Affiliation
41612009
Accession No: 20090406-5066
Description:
Comments in response to and rebuttal of posting by the McNaughton's regarding Hunters
Ridge/12C - Comment of Andrew Durkin under CP07-62, et aL
Filed By:
Filed Date:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
411712009
Accession No: 20090417-5136
Description:
Motion for Leave to Respond and Response of Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC to
Answer of AES Sparrow Point LNG, LLC and Mid-Atlantic Express, L.L C to Requests for Rehearing
under CP07-62, et al
Filed By:
Filed Date:
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
4/30/2009
Accession No: 20090501-0200
Description:
Maryland Department of the Environment submits comments re the Clean Water Act,
Section 401 Water Quality Certification for AES Sparrows Point LNG and Mid-Atlantic Express, LLC
Dredging and Pipeline Project, CP07-62 et al
87
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Title | 20934989.tif |
| File Modified | 2010-03-30 |
| File Created | 0000-00-00 |