On January 28, 2010, the Commission adopted a First Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (the ÂOrderÂ) in MB Docket No. 09-52, FCC 10-24. The Order adopts changes to certain procedures associated with the award of broadcast radio construction permits by competitive bidding, including modifications to the manner in which it awards preferences to applicants under the provisions of Section 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the ÂActÂ). With regard to AM application processing, the Commission adopted a proposal to explicitly prohibit the downgrading of proposed AM facilities that receive a dispositive preference under Section 307(b) of the Act and thus are not awarded through competitive bidding. Specifically, an AM applicant that receives a dispositive preference under Section 307(b) will not be allowed to later modify that proposal to serve a smaller population or otherwise negate the factors that led to the award of the preference. The Commission imposed these restrictions for a period of four years of on-air operations. These procedural safeguards are necessary to protect the integrity of our Section 307(b) analyses.
US Code:
47 USC 154(i)
Name of Law: Communications Act of 1934, as amended
US Code:
47 USC 308
Name of Law: Communications Act of 1934, as amended
US Code:
47 USC 303
Name of Law: Communications Act of 1934, as amended
The Commission has program changes to the annual burden hours of +270 hours and cost burden of +$40,537.50 ($40,538 rounded) due to the adoption of information collection requirements contained in the Order. The increases are due to revisions made to FCC 301 to include a new question asking AM broadcast applicants to certify that the construction permit application complies with the four year Âsubstantial equivalency service requirements if the AM facility that is the subject of the application was awarded on the basis of a dispositive Section 307(b) preference. These changes reflect an increase by one quarter hour per application for AM applicants and/or their consulting engineers to evaluate compliance with FCC rules and assess whether the facility provides service substantially as proposed for those applicants that had received a dispositive preference under Section 307(b) of the Act. We also made modifications to the instructions for the Legal Section (Instructions, Section III A - AM Engineering) of Form 301 that do not add burdens because they are editorial in nature.
The Commission also had adjustments to the annual cost burden of +$40,614,424 which were due to increases in consulting fees.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.