Federal Register 30-day Notice

57086

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1

leadership, the NRC staff recommended
moving the trait ‘‘Leadership Safety
Values and Actions’’ to the top of the
traits list to give it visual prominence.
• Several comments indicated that
there should be a discussion of
complacency in the SOP. Complacency
can occur because of long term success
and repetition. Although this is already
indirectly addressed in the traits (e.g.,
Effective Safety Communication and
Personal Accountability are traits that
prevent complacency), the NRC staff
recommended further discussion of
complacency in the revised draft SOP.
The NRC is asking for comments as to
whether it is useful to add a discussion
on this aspect of safety culture to the
SOP.
VI. Questions for Which NRC Is
Seeking Input
(1) The revised definition of Nuclear
Safety Culture is: ‘‘Nuclear Safety
Culture is the core values and behaviors
resulting from a collective commitment
by leaders and individuals to emphasize
safety over competing goals to ensure
protection of people and the
environment.’’ Should this be retained,
as currently written, or should it be
revised?
(2) Does including the safety culture
traits in the SOP itself clarify your
understanding of what the Commission
means by a positive safety culture? If
not, what additional guidance do you
think is needed?
(3) Does the revised draft SOP provide
a clear statement of the NRC’s
expectations that the regulated
community should maintain a safety
culture that includes balanced
consideration of safety and security? If
not, what changes or additions should
be made?
(4) Should a discussion regarding
complacency be added to the SOP and/
or to the traits that describe areas
important to safety?
(5) In late August 2010, the Institute
of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)
completed a validation study to assess
the extent to which the factors that
emerged from analyzing responses to a
safety culture survey match the traits
that were identified during the February
2010 workshop. Only individuals
working at nuclear reactors participated
in the survey.
The study provides general support
for the traits developed at the workshop;
however, the study provides a slightly
different grouping. Under the validation
study, there are nine traits: (1)
Management Responsibility/
Commitment to Safety; (2) Willingness
to Raise Concerns; (3) Decision-making;
(4) Supervisor Responsibility for Safety;

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:46 Sep 16, 2010

Jkt 220001

(5) Questioning Attitude; (6) Safety
Communication; (7) Personal
Responsibility for Safety; (8) Prioritizing
Safety; and (9) Training Quality. Four of
these are consistent with the eight traits
developed by the workshop
participants, i.e., Management
Responsibility is consistent with
Leadership Safety Values and Actions;
Willingness to Raise Concerns relates to
Environment for Raising Concerns;
Safety Communication relates to
Effective Safety Communication; and
Personal Responsibility for Safety is
consistent with Personal Accountability.
The remaining five traits identified in
the study, i.e., Decision-making,
Supervisor Responsibility for Safety,
Questioning Attitude, Prioritizing
Safety, and Training Quality, are not as
closely related (although they are not
completely dissimilar). This is new
information. The NRC is seeking
stakeholder comments on this
information though the FRN and
through the public meeting scheduled
for September 28 in Las Vegas.
To ensure efficient consideration of
your comments, if you are responding to
a specific question, please identify it by
number with your comment. When
commenting, please exercise caution
with regard to site-specific securityrelated information. Comments will be
made available to the public in their
entirety. Personal information such as
your name, address, telephone number,
and e-mail address will not be removed
from your submission.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 10th day
of Sept, 2010.
Roy P. Zimmerman,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2010–23249 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT
Submission for Review: Federal Cyber
Service: Scholarship for Service (SFS)
Registration Web Site
Office of Personnel
Management.
ACTION: 30-Day Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:

The Office of Personnel
Management (OPM), Human Resources
Solutions Division, offers the general
public and other Federal agencies the
opportunity to comment on an existing
information collection request (ICR)
3206–0246, SFS Registration. As
required by the Paperwork Reduction

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00108

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), as amended by the ClingerCohen Act (Pub. L. 104–106), OPM is
soliciting comments for this collection.
The information collection was
previously published in the Federal
Register on April 19, 2010 at 75 FR
20400, allowing for a 60-day public
comment period. One comment was
received, and OPM provided a response.
The purpose of this notice is to allow an
additional 30 days for public comments.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
that:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until October 18, 2010.
This process is conducted in accordance
with 5 CFR 1320.1.
ADDRESS: Interested persons are invited
to submit written comments on the
proposed information collection to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, 725 17th Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk
Officer for the Office of Personnel
Management or sent via electronic mail
to [email protected] or
faxed to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A
copy of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by contacting the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, 725
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
20503, Attention: Desk Officer for the
Office of Personnel Management or sent
via electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed
to (202) 395–6974.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SFS
Program was established by the National
Science Foundation in accordance with

E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM

17SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 180 / Friday, September 17, 2010 / Notices
the Federal Cyber Service Training and
Education Initiative as described in the
President’s National Plan for
Information Systems Protection. This
program seeks to increase the number of
qualified students entering the fields of
information assurance and computer
security in an effort to respond to the
threat to the Federal Government’s
information technology infrastructure.
The program provides selected 4-year
colleges and universities scholarship
grants to attract students to the
information assurance field.
Participating students who receive
scholarships from this program are
required to serve a 10-week internship
during their studies and complete a
post-graduation employment
commitment equivalent to the length of
the scholarship or one year, whichever
is longer. Approval of the webpage is
necessary to facilitate the timely
registration, selection and placement of
program-enrolled students in Federal
agencies.
Analysis
Agency: Office of Personnel
Management, Human Resources
Solutions Division.
Title: Scholarship for Service (SFS)
Program Internet Site.
OMB Number: 3206–0246.
Frequency: Annually.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Number of Respondents: 630.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 1
hour.
Total Burden Hours: 630 hours.
U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
John Berry,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010–23232 Filed 9–16–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CP2010–104; Order No. 530]

New Postal Product
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice.

AGENCY:
ACTION:

The Commission is noticing a
recently-filed Postal Service request to
add a Global Expedited Package
Services 3 contract to the competitive
product list. This notice addresses
procedural steps associated with this
filing.

wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with NOTICES_PART 1

SUMMARY:

Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at http://
www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot
submit their views electronically should

ADDRESSES:

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:46 Sep 16, 2010

Jkt 220001

contact the person identified in FOR
by
telephone for advice on alternatives to
electronic filing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
[email protected] or 202–789–
6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Notice of Filing
III. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On September 1, 2010, the Postal
Service filed a notice announcing that it
has entered into an additional Global
Expedited Package Services 3 (GEPS 3)
contract.1 The Postal Service believes
the instant contract is functionally
equivalent to previously submitted
GEPS contracts, and is supported by
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached
to the Notice and originally filed in
Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1,
Attachment 3. The Notice explains that
Order No. 86, which established GEPS
1 as a product, also authorized
functionally equivalent agreements to be
included within the product, provided
that they meet the requirements of 39
U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290,
the Commission approved the GEPS 2
product.2 In Order No. 503, the
Commission approved the GEPS 3
product. Additionally, the Postal
Service requested to have the contract in
Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the
baseline contract for future functional
equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3
product.
The instant contract. The Postal
Service filed the instant contract
pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition,
the Postal Service contends that the
instant contract is in accordance with
Order No. 86. The Postal Service relates
that the instant contract is for the same
mailer as in Docket No. CP2009–60. It
states that the mailer’s current contract
was scheduled to terminate at the end
of its one year term on August 31, 2010;
however, it filed a Motion for
Temporary Relief to extend the contract
pending completion of the
Commission’s review of the successor
1 Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing
A Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited
Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreement
and Application For Non-Public Treatment of
Materials Filed Under Seal, September 1, 2010
(Notice).
2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting
Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package
Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August
28, 2009 (Order No. 290).

PO 00000

Frm 00109

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

57087

contract.3 The Commission granted an
extension of the contract ‘‘until the
sooner of the Commission’s order on the
successor contract or September 30,
2010.’’4
The term of the instant contract is 1
year from the date the Postal Service
notifies the customer that all necessary
regulatory approvals have been
received. Notice at 3.
In support of its Notice, the Postal
Service filed four attachments as
follows:
•Attachment 1—a redacted copy of
the contract and applicable annexes;
•Attachment 2—a certified statement
required by 39 CFR 3015.5(c)(2) for the
contract;
•Attachment 3—a redacted copy of
Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which
establishes prices and classifications for
GEPS contracts, a description of
applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for
prices, an analysis of the formulas, and
certification of the Governors’ vote; and
•Attachment 4—an application for
non-public treatment of materials to
maintain redacted portions of the
contract and supporting documents
under seal.
The Notice advances reasons why the
instant GEPS 3 contract fits within the
Mail Classification Schedule language
for GEPS. The Postal Service identifies
customer-specific information and
general contract terms that distinguish
the instant contract from the baseline
GEPS 3 agreement. Id. at 4–5. It states
that the differences, which include price
variations based on updated costing
information and volume commitments,
do not alter the contract’s functional
equivalency. Id. at 4. The Postal Service
asserts that ‘‘[b]ecause the agreement
incorporates the same cost attributes
and methodology, the relevant
characteristics of this GEPS contract are
similar, if not the same, as the relevant
characteristics of previously filed
contracts.’’ Id.
The Postal Service concludes that its
filing demonstrates that this new GEPS
3 contract complies with the
requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is
functionally equivalent to the baseline
GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests
that the instant contract be included
within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5.
II. Notice of Filing
The Commission establishes Docket
No. CP2010–104 for consideration of
matters related to the contract identified
in the Postal Service’s Notice.
3 Motion of the United States Postal Service for
Temporary Relief, August 26, 2010 (Motion).
4 Order Granting Motion for Temporary Relief,
August 27, 2010.

E:\FR\FM\17SEN1.SGM

17SEN1