Reg_10644698_Sup_Stmnt[1]

Reg_10644698_Sup_Stmnt[1].doc

REG-106446-98 (TD 9003 - Final) Relief From Joint and Several Liability

OMB: 1545-1719

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT



1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


This document contains final regulations relating to relief from joint and several liability under section 6015 of the Internal Revenue Code. The regulations reflect changes in the law made by the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 and by the Community Renewal Tax Relief Act of 2000. The regulations provide guidance to married individuals filing joint returns who seek relief from joint and several liability.


Amendments to 26 CFR part 1. Section 412 of the Tax Reform Act of 1984, Public Law 98-369 (98 Stat. 792), repealed section 6015 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code), which required individuals to file declarations of estimated income tax. Public Law 98-369 (98 Stat. 792) is effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 1984; however, individual taxpayers still must pay estimated tax in quarterly installments under section 6654 of the Code.


2. USE OF DATA


The IRS requires this information to determine if taxpayers electing the application of § 6015(b) or § 6015(b), or requesting relief under § 6015(f) are entitled to relief from joint and several liability.


3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency whenever possible.


5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER ENTITIES


Not applicable.


6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.


8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


A notice of proposed rulemaking was published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2001, with correction dated March 29, 2001 (66 FR 17130). A public hearing was held on May 30, 2001. The final regulations were published in the Federal Register on July 18, 2002 (67 FR 47278).


In response to the Federal Register notice dated January 19, 2010 (75 FR 2930), we received no comments during the comment period regarding Regulation 106446-98 (TD 9003).


9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 USC 6103.


11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


Section 6015 of the Internal Revenue Code provides relief from joint and several liability to taxpayers who file joint returns. Section 1.6015-5 of the proposed regulations provides that taxpayers who are electing the application of § 6015(b) or 6015(c) or requesting relief under § 6015(f) must either file Form 8857, or submit a written statement containing the same information as required on Form 8857 signed under penalties of perjury. The estimate of the reporting burden in proposed §1.6015-5 for filing a claim for relief from joint and several liability is reflected in the burden of Form 8857. The estimated burden for Form 8857 is 59 minutes per respondent.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.


13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated January 19, 2010 (75 FR 2930), requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.


15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the IRS intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.



4



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorUS Department of Treasury
Last Modified ByUS Department of Treasury
File Modified2010-05-19
File Created2010-05-19

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy