30 day FRN (Published)

60134

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Notices

Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Public
Law 92–436, 86 Stat. 470 (5 U.S.C.
App.2). The AMSCs shall assist the
Captain of the Port in the development,
review, update, and exercising of the
AMS Plan for their area of
responsibility. Such matters may
include, but are not limited to:
Identifying critical port infrastructure
and operations; Identifying risks
(threats, vulnerabilities, and
consequences); Determining mitigation
strategies and implementation methods;
Developing strategies to facilitate the
recovery of the MTS after a
Transportation Security Incident;
Developing and describing the process
to continually evaluate overall port
security by considering consequences
and vulnerabilities, how they may
change over time, and what additional
mitigation strategies can be applied; and
Providing advice to, and assisting the
Captain of the Port in developing and
maintaining the Area Maritime Security
Plan.
AMS Committee Membership
Members of the AMSC should have at
least 5 years of experience related to
maritime or port security operations.
The Detroit AMSC has 19 members. We
are seeking to fill 15 vacancies with this
solicitation. Applicants may be required
to pass an appropriate security
background check prior to appointment
to the committee.
Members’ terms of office will be for 5
years; however, a member is eligible to
serve an additional term of office.
Members will not receive any salary or
other compensation for their service on
the AMSC. In support of the policy of
the USCG on gender and ethnic
diversity, we encourage qualified
women and members of minority groups
to apply.

erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Request for Applications
Those seeking membership are not
required to submit formal applications
to the local Captain of the Port.
However, because we do have an
obligation to ensure that a specific
number of members have the
prerequisite maritime security
experience, we encourage the
submission of resumes highlighting
experience in the maritime and security
industries.
Dated: September 14, 2010.
E.J. Marohn,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port Detroit.
[FR Doc. 2010–24365 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:17 Sep 28, 2010

Jkt 220001

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
[USCBP–2007–0083]

Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed
Interpretation of the Expression ‘‘Sold
For Exportation to the United States’’
as Used in the Transaction Value
Method of Valuation in a Series of
Sales Importation Scenario
Customs and Border Protection;
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Withdrawal of proposed
interpretation.
AGENCY:

This document withdraws a
notice published in the Federal Register
on January 24, 2008, which proposed a
new interpretation of the phrase ‘‘sold
for exportation to the United States’’ for
purposes of applying the transaction
value method of valuation in a series of
sales importation scenario.
DATES: The proposed interpretation is
withdrawn on September 29, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Monika Brenner, Chief, Valuation &
Special Programs Branch, Regulations
and Rulings, Office of International
Trade, (202) 325–0038.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:

Background
On January 24, 2008, Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) published in
the Federal Register (73 FR 4254) a
notice informing interested parties that
CBP was proposing a new interpretation
of the expression ‘‘sold for exportation
to the United States’’ for purposes of
applying the transaction value method
of valuation in a series of sales
importation scenario. Under this
proposed interpretation, in a transaction
involving a series of sales, the price
actually paid or payable for the
imported goods when sold for
exportation to the United States would
be the price paid in the last sale
occurring prior to the introduction of
the goods into the United States, instead
of the first (or earlier) sale. Accordingly,
the transaction value would typically be
determined on the basis of the price
paid by the buyer in the United States.
Intervening Legislation and
Implementing Regulations

Frm 00070

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Withdrawal of Proposal
In accordance with its intent as stated
in the interim rule, CBP withdraws the
notice of proposed interpretation
published in the Federal Register (73
FR 4254) on January 24, 2008.
Dated: September 24, 2010.
Alan Bersin,
Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
[FR Doc. 2010–24464 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
U.S. Geological Survey

After CBP published its proposed
interpretation document, Congress
enacted the Food, Conservation and
Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110–246,
122 Stat. 1651 (June 18, 2008)) (‘‘the
Act’’), in which section 15422 required
the Commissioner of CBP to collect

PO 00000

information from importers for a oneyear period as to whether the declared
value was based on a ‘‘first sale’’ in a
series of sales transactions. CBP was
required to report the data to the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
on a monthly basis and, in turn, the ITC
was required to submit a report to
Congress within 90 days of receiving
CBP’s final report.
Congress also stated in the Act that,
prior to January 1, 2011, CBP should not
implement any change to its existing
interpretation of the expression ‘‘sold for
exportation to the United States’’ for
purposes of applying the transaction
value method of valuation in a series of
sales importation scenario and, then,
only in accordance with the prescribed
terms set forth in the Act.
An interim rule implementing the
Act’s first sale declaration requirement
was published in the Federal Register
(73 FR 49939) on August 25, 2008
setting forth in § 141.61(g) of title 19 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (19 CFR
141.61(g)) that for a specified time
period importers were required to
declare, at the time of entry, whether the
transaction value of the imported
merchandise was determined on the
basis of the price paid by the buyer in
the first or earlier sale occurring prior to
introduction of the merchandise into the
United States. Per the statute and the
interim regulations, this requirement set
forth in § 141.61(g) expired on August
19, 2009.
In the interim rule document
published on August 25, 2008, CBP
informed the public that the agency
intended to withdraw the proposed
interpretation.

[USGS–8327CPDM2]

Notice of a Revision of a Currently
Approved Information Collection
(1028–0091)
United States Geological
Survey (USGS), Interior.

AGENCY:

E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM

29SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 29, 2010 / Notices
Notice of a revision of a
currently approved information
collection (1028–0091).

ACTION:

We (the U.S. Geological
Survey) have sent an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval. The ICR, which is
summarized below, describes the nature
of the collection and the estimated
burden on the public.
DATES: You must submit comments on
or before December 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Please send your comments
and suggestions on this ICR to the Desk
Officer for the Department of the
Interior at OMB–OIRA at (202) 395–
5806 (fax) or
[email protected] (e-mail).
Please also send a copy of your
comments on the ICR to Phadrea Ponds,
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, U.S. Geological Survey, 2150–C
Centre Avenue, Fort Collins, CO 80526
(mail); [email protected] (e-mail).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, please contact USGS, Earlene
Swann by mail at U.S. Geological
Survey, 2150–C Center Avenue, Fort
Collins, CO 80525 or by telephone at
(970) 226–9346.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:

I. Abstract
This study was approved by OMB (on
September 30, 2009). We are requesting
a revision of this collection. The U.S.
Geological Survey’s (USGS) Land
Remote Sensing (LRS) Program has been
briefed on the results associated with
this ICR and has requested additional
information to be collected concerning
the users of Landsat Imagery. After
careful consideration and review of the
results, the LRS Program determined
that they would like to know more
about users of Landsat imagery.
Specifically, in order to meet legal and
programmatic responsibilities to
effectively manage the Landsat system,
the LRS has requested additional
information about the uses and the
values of a defined population of users
who obtain imagery from the Earth
Resources Observation and Science
Center (EROS). EROS is responsible for
collecting, processing, archiving, and
distributing Landsat imagery. Between
2008 and 2009, there was a five-fold
increase in users when imagery became
available at no cost beginning in late
2008. The LRS Program is very
interested in knowing more about this
population of users. The initial
information collection provided
information about a diverse contingent
of Landsat and other moderateresolution imagery users, but was not
Annual number of responses

Survey ............................................................................................
Non-respondents ...........................................................................
Total ........................................................................................

erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Estimated Annual Reporting and
Recordkeeping ‘‘Non-Hour Cost’’: There
are no ‘‘non-hour cost’’ burdens
associated with this collection of
information.
III. Request for Comments
We are inviting comments concerning
this ICR on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the agency to perform its duties,
including whether the information is
useful; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden on the respondents, including
the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:17 Sep 28, 2010

Jkt 220001

13,051
1,722
14,773

[FR Doc. 2010–24374 Filed 9–28–10; 8:45 am]

Frm 00071

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

II. Data
OMB Control Number: 1028–0091.
Title: Users, Uses, and Value of
Landsat Satellite Imagery.
Type of Request: This is a revision of
a currently approved collection.
Respondent Obligation: Voluntary.
Frequency of Collection: One-time.
Estimated Annual Number of and
Description of Respondents: 14,773.
State and Local Government, private
individuals, state and local land
management officials, scientists, and
geographic researchers.
Estimated
annual burden

30 minutes .......................................................
3 minutes .........................................................
..........................................................................

Dated: September 22, 2010.
D. Bryant Cramer,
Associate Director for Geography.

PO 00000

generalizable to the entire population of
users, and did not include new users
who may have begun using Landsat
after it became available at no cost. This
collection has been revised to provide
USGS with information about a
population of users for which they
currently have no existing data.
Additionally, this information could
help guide efforts to provide suitable
replacement imagery in the event of a
break in Landsat continuity by
providing a better understanding of
likely user responses to this scenario.
This information collection will be
conducted by scientists and staff in the
Policy Analysis and Science Assistance
Branch (PASA) of the USGS. The
information collection will be
conducted online.

Estimated completion time per respondent

public record. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment including your personal
identifying information, may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.

BILLING CODE 4311–AM–P

60135

6,526
87
6,613

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R9-LE-2010-N213] [99011-1224-00009B]

Information Collection Sent to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for Approval; 1018-0092;
Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit
Applications and Reports—Law
Enforcement
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
AGENCY:

We (Fish and Wildlife
Service) have sent an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB for
review and approval. We summarize the
ICR below and describe the nature of the
collection and the estimated burden and
cost. This ICR is scheduled to expire on

SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\29SEN1.SGM

29SEN1