Final542ssRev

FINAL OMB SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR

NRC FORMS 542 AND 542A

UNIFORM LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANIFEST

INDEX AND REGIONAL COMPACT TABULATION

(3150-0165)

---

EXTENSION REQUEST

Description of the Information Collection

Current industry practice requires standardized forms to meet Department of Transportation (DOT), NRC, and State requirements. NRC Form 542 is specifically designed to provide the means to meet the authority of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985. Although DOT requires the information, it does not require that it be completed on a Federal form. NUREG/BR-0204, Rev. 2, contains instructions for completing NRC Forms 540, 540A, 541, 541A, 542, and 542A.

NRC Form 542 and continuation Form 542A were developed by NRC at the request of low-level waste industry groups. These forms are completed by waste collectors or processors. Tracking the identity of the waste generator becomes more complicated when the waste forms, dimensions, or packaging are changed by the waste processor. Each container of waste shipped from a waste processor may contain waste from several different generators. This information is listed on NRC Forms 542 and 542A.

A. JUSTIFICATION

1. Need for and Practical Utility of the Collection of Information

To meet existing regulations, each shipment of low-level waste (LLW) is currently accompanied by a manifest that describes the shipment contents as required in 10 CFR Part 20 and the DOT regulations in 49 CFR Part 172. Presently, there are three LLW disposal facilities in operation. The detailed information requested on NRC Form 542 will enhance the ability of NRC and State regulatory agencies to control and safely regulate disposal of LLW. Licensees must use specified NRC forms, including NRC Form 542, pursuant to Appendix G to 10 CFR Part 20.

2. Agency Use of Information

The agency require the information on NRC Forms 542 and 542A to ensure that States and Compacts know the original generators of LLW, as authorized by the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985, so that the waste is disposed of in the appropriate Compact.

3. Reduction of Burden through Information Technology

There are no legal obstacles to reducing the burden associated with this information collection. The NRC encourages respondents to use information technology when it would be beneficial to them. NRC issued a regulation on October 10, 2003 (68 FR 58791), consistent with the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, which allows its licensees, vendors, applicants, and members of the public the option to make submissions electronically via CD-ROM, e-mail, special Web-based interface or other means. It is estimated that approximately 95% of the potential responses are filed electronically.

The NRC has structured the forms so that LLW generators may transmit the information electronically to either waste brokers or the LLW disposal site facility on a voluntary basis for their convenience. The Department of Energy (DOE) has developed software (LOW-TRACK) to allow licensees to transmit NRC Form 542 electronically and makes the software available free to licensees. The information is not transmitted to NRC.

4. Effort to Identify Duplication and Use Similar Information

No sources of similar information are available. There is no duplication of requirements. NRC has in place an ongoing program to examine all information collections with the goal of eliminating all duplication and/or unnecessary information collections.

5. Effort to Reduce Small Business Burden

The required information is necessary from all shippers of LLW. To the extent that small entities may make fewer waste shipments than larger entities, fewer manifests would be required of small entities and their burden would be proportionately less. DOE has developed free software (LOW-TRACK) for LLW shippers' use. NRC has evaluated this software to ensure that all regulatory requirements are met.

6. Consequences to Federal Program or Policy Activities if the Collection is Not Conducted or is Conducted Less Frequently

If the collection is not conducted at all or is conducted less frequently, NRC and State regulatory agencies will not be able to obtain information needed to control and safely regulate disposal of LLW.

7. Circumstances Which Justify Variation from OMB Guidelines

There are no variations from OMB guidelines.

8. Consultations Outside the NRC

The opportunity for public comment on the information collections requirements for this clearance package was published in the Federal Register on March 16, 2010 (75 FR 12575).  One comment was received on May 16, 2010.

Comment

The NRC neglected to cite in Item 3 "How often the collection is required:" that the DOE collects information on Forms 541 and 542 from the disposal sites and has it loaded into the national Manifest Information Management System (MIMS). NRC also states that "No reporting" is made to the NRC, however power plants are required to report Solid Radwaste Effluents to the NRC annually per RG 1.21 and this information comes from these manifest. Thus, there is an annual reporting to the NRC. NRC should consider revising Regulatory Guide 1.21 to require reporting of LLW disposal shipments of licensee waste. This means shipments "from" waste processors of licensee LLW to a disposal site would be reported annually to the NRC versus bulk shipments of material to processors for which the Waste Class cannot be determined. This change to RG 1.21 would align the NRC reporting requirements with the MIMS data base. If that approach is taken, NRC should allow licensees to transmit MIMS data electronically to NRC to eliminate the burden of preparing annual Solid Radwaste Reports. Working with DOE, NRC and licensees could develop an electronic report to meet the RG 1.21 requirements. Such reporting can then be expanded for licensees to submit reports to Compacts and States as required from the MIMS data base and eliminate the burden of producing redundant reports.

NRC Response:

NRC regulates the licensees required to complete NRC Forms 541 and 542, however the forms go directly to the agencies (DOE and DOT) that monitor the information. Regulatory Guide 1.21 is not applicable to all licensees required to complete NRC Forms 240/241/242, for this information collection. Regulatory Guide 1.21 is only applicable to nuclear power plant licensees.

Response to Questions in the Federal Register Notice

Comment:

1.a. Since the NRC does not acknowledge it collects this data, it would not appear this data is necessary for NRC to properly perform its function. However, Annual Solid Radwaste Effluents are required to be reported to the NRC for its oversight function and the information on these forms is needed to produce these reports.

1.b. The information has a practical utility once it is properly compiled by the DOE in the MIMS data base. MIMS reports can (or could) be used to report LLW disposal quantities to States, Compacts and the NRC.

NRC Response:

Information collected on NRC Forms 541 and 542 is primarily to comply with

regulatory requirements in Agreement States (SC, WA, and UT) equivalent to

10 CFR Part 20 Appendix G. As commenter notes, the information has other

practical applications, such as input to DOE’s MIMS database.

Comment:

2. Continued use of these Forms as they are is no more or less burdensome than the non-uniform manifest Forms used previously.

NRC Response: We agree with comment.

Comment:

3. I don't think any changes need to be made to these Forms.

NRC Response: We agree with comment.

Comment:

4. What is burdensome is that the information on these forms must

be reported to several different entities (States, Compacts, and the NRC).

The redundant transcription of data from one format to another could be

eliminated if NRC would work with DOE to improve the MIMS data base and report generation from this national data base.

NRC Response:

Information requirements and data gathering of States, compacts and NRC regarding LLW quantities are similar but not identical. As noted in 1 b. above the information gathered using NRC Forms 541 and 542 is primarily for compliance with Agreement State equivalent of 10 CFR Pt 20 Appendix G. Concerns regarding redundancy re: RG 1.21 would be best addressed in another context.

9. Payment or Gift to Respondents

Not applicable.

10. Confidentiality of the Information

Confidential and proprietary information is protected in accordance with NRC regulations at 10 CFR 9.17(a) and 10 CFR 2.390(b). However, no information normally considered confidential or proprietary is requested.

11. Justification for Sensitive Questions

This information collection does not involve sensitive questions.

12. Estimated Burden and Burden Hour Cost

It is estimated that 756 NRC Forms 542 will be processed annually by 22 NRC and Agreement States licensees. Only collectors/processors complete this form. The average burden to complete the form is estimated to be 0.75 hours. The total industry burden for completion of the form is estimated at 567 hours annually (756 forms x 0.75 hours). Professional personnel will complete this information. Therefore, total cost is estimated to be $145,719 (567 hours x $257/hr).

13. Estimated of Other Additional Cost

There are no additional costs.

14. Estimated Annualized Cost to the Federal Government

The estimated annual cost to the Federal Government will be approximately $1,100 for manifest printing and distribution. This cost will be fully recovered through fee assessments to NRC licensees pursuant to 10 CFR Parts 170 and/or 171. The forms are not submitted to NRC.

15. Reasons for Changes in Burden or Cost

There is no change in burden, but the hourly cost for professional staff has increased from $214/hr to $257/hr.

16. Publication for Statistical Use

None.

17. Reason for Not Displaying the Expiration Date

The expiration date will be displayed on the hardcopy form. However, the electronic version of NRC Form 542, provided in software developed and distributed by DOE to allow licensees to transmit NRC Form 542 electronically, will not display an expiration date because it would not be possible to revise the expiration date after the diskettes have been distributed to licensees.

18. Exceptions to the Certification Statement

There are no exceptions.

B. COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS

The collection of information does not employ statistical methods.