DADT_Supporting Statement B

DADT_Supporting Statement B.docx

Service Member Spouse Survey

OMB: 0704-0473

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf






Supporting Statement B For:



DoD Comprehensive Review Working Group (CRWG)

on the Impact of Repealing the

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Policy

Spouse Mail Survey

3 August 2010
Revised



SPOUSE SURVEY



Table of Contents

B. Collections of information employing statistical methods 1

B.1 Respondent Universe and Sampling Methods 1

B.1.1 Mail Survey 1

B.2 Procedures for the Collection of Information 2

B.2.1 Statistical Methodology for Stratification and Sample Selection 2

B.2.2 Problems Requiring Special Sampling Procedures 8

B.2.3 Periodic Data Collection to Reduce Burden 9

B.2.4 Data Collection Procedures—Mail Survey 9

B.2.5 Estimation 11

B.3 Methods to Maximize Response Rates and Deal with Non-response 11

B.3.1 Mailing protocol 11

B.3.2 Statistical weighting 12

B.3.3 Nonresponse-bias study 12

B.4 Test of Procedures or Methods to be Undertaken 13

B.5 Individuals Consulted on Statistical Aspects and Individuals Collecting and/or Analyzing Data 14






B. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS

B.1 Respondent Universe and Sampling Methods

Different approaches will be used to select respondents for different data collections. This section provides a description of the respondent universes and sampling methods for the mail survey data collection.


B.1.1 Mail Survey


Two populations of spouses will be surveyed: spouses of active duty members and spouses of Reserve and National Guard members. The target population of active duty spouses will be spouses of active duty members of the Army, Navy, Marine, Air Force and Coast Guard, up to and including pay grade O06 (captain in the Navy and Coast Guard, or colonel in the other services) with at least 6 months service as of June 15, 2010. The target population of Reserve and National Guard member spouses will be spouses of members of the Army National Guard, the Army Reserve, the Naval Reserve, the Marine Corps Reserve, the Coast Guard Reserve, the Air Force Reserve, or the Air National Guard, up to and including pay grade O06 with at least 6 months service as of June 15, 2010.


Spouses of members of the Reserve or National Guard who have been activated under authority of Title 10 or Title 32 will be included in the population of Reserve and National Guard spouses, not the population of active duty spouses. Both spouse populations will exclude spouses in dual-military marriages--that is, a marriage in which each spouse is an active duty member, Reserve, or National Guard member.


The population size for the active duty spouses is approximately 660,000 and that for spouse of Reserve and National Guard members is approximately 390,000. Data from the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) will be used to construct a sampling frame of the married service members corresponding to each target population. A stratified sample will be selected from each sampling frame, and then DEERS will be used a second time to obtain contact information for the spouses of the sampled service members. The expected overall response rate for the survey is 35 percent.




B.2 Procedures for the Collection of Information

This section describes procedures that will be performed before, during, and after data collection. The discussion includes stratification, sample selection, protocols for data collection, and estimation.


B.2.1 Statistical Methodology for Stratification and Sample Selection


DEERS data will be used to create a sampling frame of the married service members corresponding to each target population. DEERS contains a large number of data variables that can be used to stratify the constructed sampling frames. To determine which variables should be used to create strata, members of the DOD’s Comprehensive Review Working Group (CRWG) were consulted to determine the estimation domains of interest specified in Table B-1. DEERS data were then used to identify low-prevalence domains, and the response rates from other DOD surveys of military spouses were used to identify low-response domains. This resulted in selection of the following variables to be used to stratify the frame of married active duty members, so that low-prevalence and low-response domains can be oversampled:


  • Service (5 levels: Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard)

  • Pay grade (5 levels to be crossed with other variables; warrant officers put in separate stratum )

  • Geographic location of service member (2 levels)

  • Gender of service member (2 levels)


Similarly, the following variables were selected to stratify the frame of married Reserve and National Guard members:

  • Reserve component (7 levels)

  • Pay grade (5 levels to be crossed with other variables; warrant officers put in separate stratum )

  • Gender of service member (2 levels)

  • Reserve program (3 levels to be crossed with other variables; Individual Mobilization Augmentees (IMA’s) put in separate stratum )









Table B-1. Estimation domains for spouse surveys

Domain variable


Levels of domain variable

Active duty spouses

Reserve component spouses

Member demographics

Service




Pay grade


Service by pay grade


Deployment status


Location


Program



Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Coast Guard for active duty; ARNG, USAR, USNR, USMCR, ANG, USAFR, USCGR for National Guard and reserves


E1-E4, E5-E9, W1-W5, O1-03, O4-O6


Same as above, except warrant officers not disaggregated by service


Not deployed past 36 months, Deployed past 36 months, Not Deployed past 12 months, Deployed past 12 months


U.S., Overseas (Europe, Asia and Pacific), On base, Off base


Reserve unit, Reserve unit technician, Full-time support personnel, IMA



X




X


X



X



X





X




X


X



X





X

Spouse demographics

Gender


Race/Ethnicity


Age


Family status



Male, Female


Non-Hispanic white, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic


25 years old or younger, 26-30, 31-35, 36-40, 40+


With child(ren), Without child(ren)



X


X


X


X



X


X


X


X



For the survey of active duty spouses there will be 73 strata and for the survey of reserve component spouses there will be 120 strata. Stratum allocations will be determined by using the Sample Design Tool developed by Research Triangle Institute (Kavee and Mason, 1997) for the Defense Manpower Data Center, based on the multivariate allocation algorithm described by Chromy (1987). A simple random sample of married service members will be selected from each stratum, yielding corresponding fielded spouse samples of approximately 70,000 active duty spouses and approximately 80,000 spouses of Reserve and National Guard members. Table B-2 displays the values of the stratification variables, population sizes, fielded sample sizes, and expected number of completes for each stratum in the survey of active-duty spouses. Table B-3 displays similar information for the survey of Reserve spouses.




Table B-2: Strata for Active Duty Spouse Survey

Stratum

Values of stratification variables

Population size

Expected completes

Fielded sample size

1

Army_E1-E4_US_Male

71,805

883

4,947

2

Army_E1-E4_US_Female

8,697

85

835

3

Army_E1-E4_Oversea_Male

9,116

113

634

4

Army_E1-E4_Oversea_Female

999

10

98

5

Army_E5-E6_US_Male

80,900

1,109

5,026

6

Army_E5-E6_US_Female

4,465

54

344

7

Army_E5-E6_Oversea_Male

10,702

150

691

8

Army_E5-E6_Oversea_Female

555

7

46

9

Army_E7-E9_US_Male

36,482

646

2,115

10

Army_E7-E9_US_Female

1,613

26

97

11

Army_E7-E9_Oversea_Male

4,329

78

259

12

Army_E7-E9_Oversea_Female

224

4

14

13

Army_O1-O3_US_Male

17,401

593

1,547

14

Army_O1-O3_US_Female

2,153

69

209

15

Army_O1-O3_Oversea_Male

1,883

65

168

16

Army_O1-O3_Oversea_Female

240

8

23

17

Army_O4-O6_US_Male

20,342

612

1,401

18

Army_O4-O6_US_Female

1,488

47

104

19

Army_O4-O6_Oversea_All

2,726

83

190

20

Navy_E1-E4_US_Male

27,777

657

3,857

21

Navy_E1-E4_US_Female

3,735

66

742

22

Navy_E1-E4_Oversea_All

1,182

28

169

23

Navy_E5-E6_US_Male

56,332

807

3,567

24

Navy_E5-E6_US_Female

3,532

45

293

25

Navy_E5-E6_Oversea_Male

4,929

70

323

26

Navy_E5-E6_Oversea_Female

292

4

25

27

Navy_E7-E9_US_Male

21,305

659

2,080

28

Navy_E7-E9_US_Female

664

20

78

29

Navy_E7-E9_Oversea_All

2,072

66

202

30

Navy_O1-O3_US_Male

12,666

619

1,604

31

Navy_O1-O3_US_Female

1,139

53

161

32

Navy_O1-O3_Oversea_All

1,074

52

139

33

Navy_O4-O6_US_Male

13,974

618

1,517

34

Navy_O4-O6_US_Female

1,136

50

128

35

Navy_O4-O6_Oversea_All

1,426

64

158

36

Marine Corps_E1-E4_US_Male

29,565

695

3,591

37

Marine Corps_E1-E4_US_Female

789

15

141

38

Marine Corps_E1-E4_Oversea_All

1,449

34

187

39

Marine Corps_E5-E6_US_Male

26,924

673

3,076

40

Marine Corps_E5-E6_US_Female

505

12

80

41

Marine Corps_E5-E6_Oversea_All

2,170

55

260

42

Marine Corps_E7-E9_US_All

10,206

636

2,116

43

Marine Corps_E7-E9_Oversea_All

1,298

81

274

44

Marine Corps_O1-O3_US_All

5,697

623

1,930

45

Marine Corps_O1-O3_Oversea_All

483

53

166

46

Marine Corps_O4-O6_US_All

4,846

599

1,697

47

Marine Corps_O4-O6_Oversea_All

560

70

199

48

Air Force_E1-E4_US_Male

22,845

566

2,425

49

Air Force_E1-E4_US_Female

3,271

69

431

50

Air Force_E1-E4_Oversea_Male

4,056

103

442

51

Air Force_E1-E4_Oversea_Female

372

8

50

52

Air Force_E5-E6_US_Male

44,057

538

2,027

53

Air Force_E5-E6_US_Female

4,129

53

230

54

Air Force_E5-E6_Oversea_Male

10,673

139

526

55

Air Force_E5-E6_Oversea_Female

791

11

46

56

Air Force_E7-E9_US_Male

17,768

564

1,782

57

Air Force_E7-E9_US_Female

1,272

42

129

58

Air Force_E7-E9_Oversea_All

4,315

139

437

59

Air Force_O1-O3_US_Male

14,275

580

1,447

60

Air Force_O1-O3_US_Female

1,741

71

185

61

Air Force_O1-O3_Oversea_Male

1,700

70

175

62

Air Force_O1-O3_Oversea_Female

204

9

24

63

Air Force_O4-O6_US_Male

17,443

592

1,508

64

Air Force_O4-O6_US_Female

1,600

58

134

65

Air Force_O4-O6_Oversea_Male

2,346

80

205

66

Air Force_O4-O6_Oversea_Female

234

9

21

67

Coast Guard_E1-E4_US_Male

3,850

159

694

68

Coast Guard_E1-E4_US_Female

371

12

95

69

Coast Guard_E5-E6_All_All

9,114

400

1,434

70

Coast Guard_E7-E9_All_All

3,442

156

500

71

Coast Guard_O1-O3_All_All

1,889

473

1,260

72

Coast Guard_O4-O6_All_All

2,161

551

1,420

73

Warrant Officers

15,820

1,387

4,851




Table B-3: Strata for Reserve Spouse Survey

Stratum

Values of stratification variables

Population size

Expected completes

Fielded sample size

1

ANG__E1-E4_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

35,425

781

4,568

2

ANG__E1-E4_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

217

5

35

3

ANG__E1-E4_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

1,140

26

151

4

ANG__E1-E4_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

3,953

77

589

5

ANG__E1-E4_Female_Only_AGR-Mil_Only

272

6

40

6

ANG__E5-E6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

42,450

1,107

4,626

7

ANG__E5-E6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

6,068

149

753

8

ANG__E5-E6_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

5,178

137

564

9

ANG__E5-E6_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

2,291

56

274

10

ANG__E5-E6_Female_Only_AGR_Only____

653

16

87

11

ANG__E5-E6_Female_Only_MilTech_Only

451

11

54

12

ANG__E7-E9_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

12,213

377

1,131

13

ANG__E7-E9_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

7,098

212

745

14

ANG__E7-E9_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

3,303

103

305

15

ANG__E7-E9_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

384

12

37

16

ANG__E7-E9_Female_Only_AGR_Only____

533

15

59

17

ANG__E7-E9_Female_Only_MilTech_Only

241

8

22

18

ANG__O1-O3_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

8,670

375

1,196

19

ANG__O1-O3_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

999

41

159

20

ANG__O1-O3_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

573

25

79

21

ANG__O1-O3_Female_Only_NonIMA_

862

35

128

22

ANG__O4-O6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

5,307

282

739

23

ANG__O4-O6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

2,410

122

380

24

ANG__O4-O6_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

953

51

132

25

ANG__O4-O6_Female_Only_NonIMA_

492

25

75

26

AR___E1-E4_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

13,910

381

2,434

27

AR___E1-E4_Male_Only___AGR-Mil_Only

360

10

71

28

AR___E1-E4_Female_Only_NonIMA_

4,148

108

771

29

AR___E5-E6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

19,268

493

2,233

30

AR___E5-E6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

2,282

55

325

31

AR___E5-E6_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

1,473

38

171

32

AR___E5-E6_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

2,717

66

338

33

AR___E5-E6_Female_Only_AGR_Only____

365

8

57

34

AR___E5-E6_Female_Only_MilTech_Only

411

11

55

35

AR___E7-E9_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

8,757

292

959

36

AR___E7-E9_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

3,942

129

524

37

AR___E7-E9_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

1,268

43

143

38

AR___E7-E9_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

933

31

105

39

AR___E7-E9_Female_Only_AGR_Only____

593

19

86

40

AR___E7-E9_Female_Only_MilTech_Only

278

9

32

41

AR___O1-O3_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

5,572

329

1,122

42

AR___O1-O3_Male_Only___AGR-Mil_Only

698

39

163

43

AR___O1-O3_Female_Only_NonIMA_

1,660

92

360

44

AR___O4-O6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

7,579

285

787

45

AR___O4-O6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

1,728

63

213

46

AR___O4-O6_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

262

10

28

47

AR___O4-O6_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

1,218

44

134

48

AR___O4-O6_Female_Only_AGR-Mil_Only

211

8

29

49

NR___E1-E4_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

3,314

291

2,014

50

NR___E1-E4_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

653

42

653

51

NR___E1-E4_Female_Only_TPU-AGR_Only

922

77

607

52

NR___E5-E6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

12,021

354

1,616

53

NR___E5-E6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

2,518

46

693

54

NR___E5-E6_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

1,578

45

218

55

NR___E5-E6_Female_Only_AGR_Only____

430

12

85

56

NR___E7-E9_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

2,560

314

963

57

NR___E7-E9_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

906

80

610

58

NR___E7-E9_Female_Only_TPU-AGR_Only

369

44

151

59

NR___O1-O3_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

2,064

302

1,089

60

NR___O1-O3_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

190

25

137

61

NR___O1-O3_Female_Only_TPU-AGR_Only

292

41

162

62

NR___O4-O6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

5,280

326

906

63

NR___O4-O6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

853

42

231

64

NR___O4-O6_Female_Only_TPU-AGR_Only

698

42

126

65

MCR__E1-E4_Male_Only___TPU-AGR_Only

4,199

357

4,199

66

MCR__E1-E4_Female_Only_TPU-AGR_Only

237

16

237

67

MCR__E5-E6_AllGen_TPU-AGR_Only

2,963

317

2,963

68

MCR__E7-E9_AllGen_TPU-AGR_Only

1,129

288

1,129

69

MCR__O1-O3_AllGen_TPU-AGR_Only

275

75

275

70

MCR__O4-O6_AllGen_TPU-AGR_Only

903

424

903

71

AFNG_E1-E4_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

3,835

409

2,264

72

AFNG_E1-E4_Male_Only___AGR-Mil_Only

337

37

201

73

AFNG_E1-E4_Female_Only_NonIMA_

835

85

526

74

AFNG_E5-E6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

13,373

361

1,411

75

AFNG_E5-E6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

2,546

65

310

76

AFNG_E5-E6_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

5,053

139

526

77

AFNG_E5-E6_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

1,508

40

169

78

AFNG_E5-E6_Female_Only_AGR_Only____

319

8

40

79

AFNG_E5-E6_Female_Only_MilTech_Only

332

9

38

80

AFNG_E7-E9_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

5,216

192

557

81

AFNG_E7-E9_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

3,341

118

400

82

AFNG_E7-E9_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

6,043

225

635

83

AFNG_E7-E9_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

480

18

56

84

AFNG_E7-E9_Female_Only_AGR_Only____

654

22

85

85

AFNG_E7-E9_Female_Only_MilTech_Only

385

14

43

86

AFNG_O1-O3_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

1,938

325

1,087

87

AFNG_O1-O3_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

292

46

184

88

AFNG_O1-O3_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

392

67

220

89

AFNG_O1-O3_Female_Only_NonIMA_

377

60

224

90

AFNG_O4-O6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

3,295

278

762

91

AFNG_O4-O6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

1,502

120

389

92

AFNG_O4-O6_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

1,344

114

312

93

AFNG_O4-O6_Female_Only_NonIMA_

507

41

124

94

AFR__E1-E4_Male_Only___NonIMA_

2,650

335

2,198

95

AFR__E1-E4_Female_Only_NonIMA_

840

100

733

96

AFR__E5-E6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

8,050

297

1,362

97

AFR__E5-E6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

358

13

76

98

AFR__E5-E6_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

1,938

73

324

99

AFR__E5-E6_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

1,185

42

209

100

AFR__E5-E6_Female_Only_AGR-Mil_Only

192

7

34

101

AFR__E7-E9_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

4,372

235

756

102

AFR__E7-E9_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

513

28

107

103

AFR__E7-E9_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

2,171

117

376

104

AFR__E7-E9_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

586

31

108

105

AFR__E7-E9_Female_Only_AGR-Mil_Only

342

18

65

106

AFR__O1-O3_Male_Only___NonIMA_

1,234

264

900

107

AFR__O1-O3_Female_Only_NonIMA_

243

50

185

108

AFR__O4-O6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

2,823

142

389

109

AFR__O4-O6_Male_Only___AGR_Only____

562

28

90

110

AFR__O4-O6_Male_Only___MilTech_Only

783

39

111

111

AFR__O4-O6_Female_Only_NonIMA_

539

26

78

112

CGR__E1-E4_AllGen_TPU_Only____

765

61

391

113

CGR__E5-E6_Male_Only___TPU_Only____

1,419

134

616

114

CGR__E5-E6_Female_Only_TPU_Only____

220

20

103

115

CGR__E7-E9_AllGen_TPU_Only____

759

86

282

116

CGR__O1-O3_AllGen_TPU_Only____

464

213

464

117

CGR__O4-O6_AllGen_TPU_Only____

410

216

410

118

Only W1-W5 excluding IMAs

7,720

732

2,275

119

Only IMAs excluding W1-W5

8,944

2,585

8,944

120

Only IMAs AND W1-W5______

141

4

16



The size of the selected samples will be such that the expected maximum margin of errors (i.e., half widths of 95% confidence intervals) for proportions estimated for the domains specified in Table B‑1 are less than or equal to 5%. Stratum-specific response rates observed in 2008 surveys of military spouses will be used to determine the stratum allocations. The overall response rate for the 2008 Active Duty Spouses Survey was 28% and that for the 2008 Reserve Component Spouse Survey was 30%. Due to the subject matter, the response rates for the proposed surveys are expected to be higher than those for the 2008 surveys. The burden estimates in A-1 are based on overall response rates of 35% for each of the proposed spouse surveys.


B.2.2 Problems Requiring Special Sampling Procedures


Some of the domains of interest have very low prevalence. For example, the proportion of married reservists who are Individual Mobilization Augmentees (IMA’s) is less than 3% of all married reservists. Warrant officers are also a low-prevalence domain of interest. To satisfy the precision goal of constraining the margins of error for domains to be less than or equal to 5%, IMA’s and warrant officers will be assigned to their own strata and then oversampled.



B.2.3 Periodic Data Collection to Reduce Burden

This request is for a one-time data collection.

B.2.4 Data Collection Procedures Mail Survey


The data collection protocol for the Spouse survey is summarized below. This study will use a number of methods to maximize the rate of response and data quality. First, the survey will make multiple contacts with the Active Duty and Reserve Component spouse, following a Total Design Method recommended by Dillman, et al. (2008). This protocol has been designed to achieve the desired response rate of 35% through the five separate mailing activities described below.

Pre-notification Letter. An 8.5 x 11 inch pre-notification letter will be mailed to all sampled Spouses (using first-class postage) that announces the study, describes the information to be collected, and when the data collection will begin. A toll-free telephone number (and/or an email address) will be provided so respondents can make inquiries about the study. We will use letterhead and signatures that respondents will recognize and feel are important. Logos, emblems, other relevant artwork, and the use of up to two colors will be incorporated to increase awareness and distinguish our correspondence from other mail. Each letter will be personalized and inserted into a windowed number 10 business envelope.

Mail-based, self-administered questionnaire packet. This survey packet, mailed to all sample members (about one week after the pre-notification letter was mailed) using first-class postage, will include a 16-page survey booklet, an integrated cover letter, and a postage-paid business reply envelope. The sample member’s name and address information printed on the survey booklet will show through a window on the outer/carrier envelope. Surveys and their outer envelopes, should take advantage of the same logos, emblems, artwork and colors used for the pre-notification letter. An identification number (e.g. barcode) will be printed on the survey booklet for tracking respondents allowing for follow-up activities to non-respondents.

First Thank You/Reminder postcard. A standard (4x6 inch) sized postcard will be mailed to all sample members approximately 14 days after mailing the survey packet. Content of the postcard will not only thank those who have already participated in the survey, but remind those who have not yet responded to do so. Postcards will be mailed using first-class postage.

Second self-administered questionnaire packet. Identical in format and in content (with the exception of the language used in the cover letter) to the first questionnaire packet, we will mail a second questionnaire to all survey non-respondents about 1 month following the initial survey mailing. We suggest using stronger language in the cover letter that accompanies this second questionnaire to encourage participation. We anticipate mailing this packet to approximately 85% of the sample. Some completed surveys will be in-transit at the time of this mailing, so some sample members will receive a second survey despite having completed and returned their first survey. This circumstance is unavoidable given the intended data collection schedule.

Final Thank You/Reminder postcard. A second thank you/reminder postcard will be mailed only to non-respondents about two weeks after the second survey packet is mailed. This postcard, much like the cover letter used for the second survey packet cover letter, will use stronger language than previous correspondence to encourage participation aimed at increasing overall response rates. Again, the card will thank those who have already participated in the survey, but remind those who have not yet responded to do so immediately. Postcards will be mailed using first-class postage.

Survey Receipt and Processing

Sample management and receipt control systems are vital components of effective management and monitoring of the data collection process for this survey. Maintaining current and accurate sample management information prevents costly missteps and minimizes errors. A complete record of all data transactions and updates to ensure that the data are accurate and available during all phases of the survey administration will be maintained.

Returned mail surveys will be logged into the receipt control system on a continuous basis and then be prepared for data capture via TeleForm. Our receipt control and sample management systems provide real-time progress reports and are generated through a web-based interface.

After receipting returned surveys, the booklets are scanned and processed with TeleForm, they will be exported to a SQL Server database. Returned surveys will be stored securely in locked file cabinets within the enclave workspace. Electronic form images from each scanned individual paper survey page will be stored in Alchemy, an image database and retrieval system. This central digital archive will be used throughout data collection to retrieve and view images of the paper surveys if needed.


B.2.5 Estimation


Though there is some interest is using the survey data to calculate population estimates, but there is more interest in using the survey data to calculate sub-population estimates and differences among sub-population estimates. Section B.3.2 describes the procedure that will be used to calculate sampling weights, which will be used to compute weighted totals and proportions and will also be used in the multivariate analyses described in Section A.16.1. For the sub-populations specified in Table B-1, the half widths of the 95% confidence intervals for estimated proportions will be less than or equal to 5% and for differences among sub-population proportion estimates, the half width of the 95% confidence intervals will be less than or equal to 7%.


B.3 Methods to Maximize Response Rates and Deal with Non-Response

For the mail survey, the expected overall response rate is expected to be 35% for both spouses of active duty service members and spouse of reserve component service members. The mail survey data collection protocol will employ techniques to maximize response rates and address non-response. Following data collection, statistical weighting will be used to decrease non-response bias and a nonresponse bias study will be conducted.


B.3.1 Mail Protocol

To maximize the effectiveness of mail surveys the following design and process elements will be utilized throughout the field period:

  • Survey booklets and outer envelopes will be printed in two-color ink and include visual elements (logo’s, artwork developed for the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell survey, etc.) that “link” printed pieces together.

  • A machine- and human-readable code will be printed on survey booklets for tracking and quality control purposes.

  • Letters will be personalized and include the critical information about the study.

  • The assembly process will be simplified and quality control improved by using windowed envelopes (obviating the need to match personalized letter with printed address label).

  • Mailings will be sent via USPS using first-class postage ensuring timely and accurate delivery and prompt return of undeliverable mailing pieces.

  • Users can get survey support by contacting staff using our toll-free telephone line and by email. This information will be provided in all mailings.

.

Steps to minimize nonresponse are also built into the mail study protocol. These include the following:


  • Survey Advance Letters. Advance materials will be sent to all households. The advance letters will describe the study’s goals and objectives and will give assurances of confidentiality. Letters will be sent to households approximately 1 week before the household is mailed the survey.

  • Multiple Followup for the Mail Survey. If a survey is not received from a designated household 2 weeks after they are sent, a postcard reminder will be sent. If a survey has not been received 2 weeks after the postcard, a final remailing of the surveys will be sent.


B.3.2 Statistical Weighting

Sample weights will be calculated for each completed questionnaire to allow for unbiased estimates of population and sub-population proportions. The sample weights are products of the base weight, non-response adjustments, and a post-stratification adjustment. The base weight is the reciprocal of the probability of selection of each married service member. The non-response adjustments are designed to reduce the potential bias caused by differences between the responding and non-responding population and are equal to the reciprocals of weighted response rates within carefully selected response cells. The non-response adjustment cells will be constructed by starting with the sampling strata described in Tables B-2 and B-3. Some of these strata are expected to have a small number of respondents. When this occurs, strata having similar response rates will be combined to create nonresponse adjustment cells such that the resulting cells contains no less than 30 respondents.


The post-stratification adjustment modifies the non-response-adjusted base weights so that they aggregate to demographic totals computed from DEERS data by the Defense Manpower Data Center. This adjustment has the effect of reducing variance. Post-stratification adjustments will be performed by raking adjusted weights so that they add to control totals for each level of variables associated with the domains listed in Table B-1. For the Active Duty Spouse Survey, the raking dimensions will be service by pay grade, current-deployment status, location, gender, race and ethnicity, age category, and family status. All of these variables are associated with the military member. (Table B-1 indicates that he domains of interest for age and for race and ethnicity are the spouse’s age and the spouse’s race and ethnicity, not the military member’s, but control totals are not available for spouse variables.) The same raking dimensions will be used for the Reserve Spouse Survey, except instead of location the variable for Reserve program will be used.


B.3.3 Nonresponse-Bias Study


When unadjusted sample weights are used to estimate the population mean for some item, the non-response bias present in the resulting estimator is equal to the product of the nonresponse rate and the difference between the average value of the item for respondents and the average value of the item for nonrespondents. Hence, nonresponse rates are one measure of potential nonresponse bias. After the completion of data collection and the calculation of the sampling weights, base-weighted response rates will be calculated for each sample survey and for the domains specified in Table B-1. AAPOR Response Rate Formula RR3 will be used to calculate response rates.


To estimate the difference between the average value of an item for respondents and the average value of the item for nonrespondents, it is necessary to have data for the item for all the units in a sample, not just the responding units. Thus, administrative data present on the sample file, along with the base weights, will be used to estimate the difference in population means of respondents and nonrespondents for the available administrative-data variables. This will allow the estimation of non-response biases present in estimates of proportions calculated with unadjusted weights. This type of analysis will be performed on the following variables:

    1. Variables used in stratification (and the creation of nonresponse adjustment cells),

    2. Variables used in raking,

    3. Additional variables:

  • Whether military member is living on base,

  • Military member’s occupation area,

  • Military member’s career deployments

  • Whether military member deployed in last 12 months,

  • Whether military member deployed in last 24 months

  • Whether military member deployed in last 36 months



Another way to estimate nonresponse biases is to compute population means from all the data on the sampling frame and then subtract this from weighted means calculated from the unadjusted weights and the administrative data associated with the respondents. The reductions in nonresponse bias resulting from adjusting the survey weights will be determined by using the adjusted weights to repeat the estimation of the nonresponse biases present in the above administrative data variables.


B.4 Test of Procedures or Methods to be Undertaken

Testing of survey questions to understand respondent comprehension, recall methods and judgment and estimation processes will be done with active military and reserve personnel prior to the finalization of the instrument. There are no planned cognitive tests with active duty or reserve spouses.



B.5 Individuals Consulted on Statistical Aspects and/or Analyzing Data

The individuals consulted on technical and statistical issues related to the data collection are listed below.


DoD has consulted with the following staff at Westat regarding this information collection:


Shelley Perry, Ph.D.

Associated Director, Westat

Phone: (301) 251-4209 Email: [email protected]

Kimya Lee, Ph.D.

Senior Study Director, Westat

Phone: (301) 610-5522 Email: [email protected]


Susan Berkowitz, Ph.D.

Senior Study Director, Westat

Phone: (301) 294-3936 Email: [email protected]


Wayne Hintze, MA.

Senior Study Director, Westat

Phone: (301) 517-4022 Email: [email protected]



Richard Sigman, M.A.

Senior Statistician, Westat

Phone: (240) 453-2783 Email: [email protected]

On DoD’s side, those consulted in the development process included:

David E. McGrath

Chief, Personnel Survey Branch

Department of Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC)

Phone: (703)-696-2675 Email: [email protected]


Fawzi Al Nassir

Department of Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC)

Phone: 703-696-5825 Email: [email protected]

References:

Chromy, James R, (1987). Design Optimization with Multiple Objectives, Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, pp. 194-199.


Kavee, Jill D. and Mason, Robert E (1997). DMDC Sample Planning tools User’s Manual (Version 1.2), Defense Manpower Data Center, Arlington, VA.





i

File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleREQUEST FOR CLEARANCE FOR THE
AuthorTerri Davis
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-02-02

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy