Download:
pdf |
pdfInformation Collection Request
for the Proposed Revised Total
Coliform Rule
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION....................................... 1
1(a) Title and Number of the Information Collection .................................................... 1
1(b) Short Characterization ............................................................................................ 1
2 NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION .............................................................. 4
2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection .......................................................................... 4
2(b) Use/Users of the Data ............................................................................................. 5
3 NON-DUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER COLLECTION ...................
CRITERIA ........................................................................................................................ 7
3(a) Non-duplication ...................................................................................................... 7
3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB .................................... 7
3(c) Consultations .......................................................................................................... 7
3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection ....................................................................... 8
3(e) General Guidelines ................................................................................................. 8
3(f) Confidentiality ........................................................................................................ 8
3(g) Sensitive Questions ................................................................................................ 8
4 RESPONDENTS AND INFORMATION REQUESTED ................................................. 9
4(a) Respondents/NAICS Codes.................................................................................... 9
4(b) Information Requested ........................................................................................... 9
4(b)(i)
Data Items ................................................................................................... 9
4(b)(ii)
Respondent Activities ............................................................................... 12
5 INFORMATION COLLECTED -- AGENCY ACTIVITIES, COLLECTION
METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT .................................... 16
5(a) EPA Activities ...................................................................................................... 16
5(b) Collection Methodology and Management .......................................................... 16
5(c) Small Entity Flexibility ........................................................................................ 17
5(c)(i) Small Business Advocacy Review Panel Recommendations ................... 17
5(d) Collection Schedule .............................................................................................. 18
6 ESTIMATING BURDEN AND COST OF COLLECTION........................................... 19
6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden and Cost ............................................................. 19
6(a)(i) Burden and Cost to PWSs ......................................................................... 19
6(a)(i)(a) Start-Up Activities ............................................................................ 20
6(a)(i)(b) Annual Activities .............................................................................. 20
6(a)(ii) Burden and Cost to States ......................................................................... 20
6(a)(ii)(a) Start-Up Activities ............................................................................ 20
6(a)(ii)(b) Annual Activities .............................................................................. 21
6(b) Time Frame for Cost and Burden Estimates ........................................................ 21
6(c) Estimating EPA Burden and Cost ........................................................................ 22
6(d) Respondent Universe ............................................................................................ 22
6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs.................................................................. 22
6(e)(i) Bottom Line Burden and Cost Estimates for Respondents ....................... 23
6(e)(ii) Bottom Line Estimate for EPA ................................................................. 24
6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden ............................................................................. 24
6(g) Burden Statement ................................................................................................. 24
i
APPENDIX
Appendix A. Revised Total Coliform Rule Spreadsheets
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.1: Implementation Schedule .................................................................................... 15
Figure 6.1: Average Annual Net Change Burden and Costs for the Proposed RTCR ICR ... 19
Figure 6.2: Bottom Line Average Annual Net Change Burden and Costs for the 3-Year ICR
Period ...................................................................................................................................... 23
iii
ACRONYMS
AIP
BLS
CFR
CWS
EA
ECI
EPA
FACA
FILS
FOIA
FR
GWR
ICR
MCL
MCLG
NAICS
NCWS
NPDWR
O&M
OGWDW
OMB
PN
PRA
PWS
PWSS
RCRA
RFA
RTCR
SBARP
SBREFA
SDWA
SDWIS
SIC
TCR
TCRDSAC
Agreement in Principle
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Code of Federal Regulations
Community Water System
Economic Analysis
Employee Cost Index
Environmental Protection Agency
Federal Advisory Committee Act
Federal Information Locator System
Freedom of Information Act
Federal Register
Ground Water Rule
Information Collection Request
Maximum Contaminant Level
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal
North American Industry Classification System
Noncommunity Water System
National Primary Drinking Water Regulation
Operation and Maintenance
Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water
Office of Management and Budget
Public Notification
Paperwork Reduction Act
Public Water System
Public Water System Supervision
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Revised Total Coliform Rule
Small Business Advocacy Review Panel
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
Safe Drinking Water Act
Safe Drinking Water Information System
Standard Industrial Classification
Total Coliform Rule
Total Coliform Rule/Distribution System Advisory Committee
iv
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
1
IDENTIFICATION OF THE INFORMATION COLLECTION
1(a)
Title and Number of the Information Collection
Title: Information Collection Request for the Proposed Revised Total Coliform Rule
OMB Control Number:
2040-AD94
EPA ICR Number:
1895.06
Note: This Information Collection Request (ICR) covers only the first three years after rule promulgation.
The description of reporting and recordkeeping burden required for the full rule implementation, which
exceeds the 3-year period for this ICR, is provided for informational purposes only. The costs and burden
associated with the 3-year period of this ICR is described in Section 6 while the costs and burden of the
10-year full implementation period is provided in Appendix A.
1(b)
Short Characterization
The proposed Revised Total Coliform Rule (RTCR) requires information collection
regarding the effectiveness of treatment, the integrity of the distribution system, and the possible
presence of fecal contamination. All public water systems (PWSs) are included in this
information collection. The proposed RTCR uses total coliforms as an indicator to start an
evaluation process that, where necessary, will require the PWS to correct sanitary defects. Under
the proposed RTCR, E. coli will remain a regulated contaminant with a maximum contaminant
level goal (MCLG) of zero and a maximum contaminant level (MCL) based on the presence of
total coliforms and/or E. coli. All fecal coliform provisions (including the MCLG and MCL) are
removed in the proposed RTCR. The intent of the proposed RTCR is to better address the 1989
Total Coliform Rule (TCR) objectives and enhance the multi-barrier approach to protecting
public health, especially with respect to smaller ground water PWSs.
A large portion of the data collection under the proposed RTCR will involve monitoring,
assessments, corrective actions, and public notification. Under the proposed RTCR, PWSs would
continue to monitor for total coliforms and E. coli in the distribution system. All PWSs that meet
certain trigger conditions (either a Level 1 or Level 2 trigger) are required to complete a Level 1
or Level 2 assessment and submit an assessment form to the state1 within a specified time period.
For corrective actions not completed within the specified time period, PWSs must submit to the
state a timetable for completing the corrective actions. Additionally, PWSs would continue to be
required to provide public notification for violations (the level of notification depends on the
degree of public health implication of the violation). Some state activities under the proposed
RTCR include review and revision of PWSs’ sample siting plans; review of PWSs’ sampling
results; review of completed assessment forms; consultation and coordination with PWSs to
determine the appropriate corrective action to be implemented; review of PWSs’ certification of
public notification; and recordkeeping of PWSs’ submissions.
1
The term “state” in the context of this ICR refers to any state or other primacy agency that has oversight
authority for drinking water programs.
1
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
PWSs and states have monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements under the
national primary drinking water regulations (NPDWRs) (see 40 CFR2 141.402, 40 CFR 141.403,
40 CFR 142.405, 40 CFR 142.14, 40 CFR 142.15). All affected PWSs shall maintain and report
to the state information documenting compliance with the treatment and monitoring
requirements under the NPDWRs. States shall maintain records essential for program
implementation and oversight. These records, retained in the Safe Drinking Water Information
System (SDWIS), allow the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to track PWS compliance
with NPDWRs.
Data collected under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) are used by EPA’s Office of
Ground Water and Drinking Water (OGWDW), and other EPA programs such as Superfund and
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data may also be used by the Farmers
Home Administration, the Department of the Interior, the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, White House Task forces, the Federal
Emergency Management Agency, the Food and Drug Administration, public interest groups, and
many private companies and individuals.
This ICR presents the burden and costs of the proposed RTCR to PWSs and states during
the first three years following rule promulgation. For this 3-year ICR period, the average annual
net change respondent burden and cost to PWSs and states is estimated at 839,526 hours and
$23,767,060. The annual net change burden and cost to PWSs is estimated at 747,848 hours and
$20,171,639. The estimated net change annual state burden for this ICR is 91,678 hours, at an
estimated annual net change cost of $3,595,421. All costs estimated are labor costs. There are no
operation and maintenance (O&M) or capital costs for the 3-year period covered by this ICR.
The net change burden and cost estimates are discussed in greater detail in Section 6 of this
document.
Beyond the first three years after rule promulgation (when PWSs and states need to
comply with the rule), the burden and costs associated with complying with the rule for states
and PWSs will be captured in the Microbial Rules ICR (for monitoring burden and costs) and the
Public Water System Supervision (PWSS) ICR (for public notification reporting and
recordkeeping burden and costs). Since there are ongoing reporting and recordkeeping
requirements under the current TCR, Appendix A of this ICR shows the net change in the
reporting and recordkeeping burden and costs to be incurred by PWSs under the proposed
RTCR. Note that these calculations are for informational purposes only and are not part of this
ICR.
The total number of respondents for this ICR is 154,894; 154,837 respondents are PWSs
and 57 respondents are states and territories. The average annual net change in the number of
responses for PWSs is 103,225 and averages 2.0 responses per respondent annually. The average
annual net change in the number of responses for states is 51,669 and averages 906.5 responses
per respondent annually.
This ICR was prepared in accordance with the November 2005 version of EPA’s Guide
to Writing Information Collection Requests Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995
2
Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
2
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
(or “ICR Handbook”) prepared by EPA’s Office of Environmental Information, Office of
Information Collection, Collection Strategies Division. The ICR Handbook provides the most
current instructions for ICR preparation to ensure compliance with the 1995 PRA amendments
and the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) implementing guidelines.
3
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
2
June 2010
NEED FOR AND USE OF THE COLLECTION
The following sections describe the need for this information collection and the legal
authority under which this information will be collected. Section 4 contains a summary of the
major recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the proposed RTCR.
2(a)
Need/Authority for the Collection
The proposed RTCR achieves the objectives of the 1989 TCR more effectively and
efficiently, taking into account the changes in regulatory framework for implementing the
SDWA over the past 20 years and experience with the TCR since it was promulgated in 1989.
The information collected under the proposed RTCR is required by EPA to carry out its
monitoring and enforcement responsibilities under the SDWA. Without comprehensive,
up-to-date information on drinking water contamination, EPA would not be able to meet the
SDWA statutory requirements.
Section 1401(1)(D) of the SDWA requires that an NPDWR
contains criteria and procedures to assure a supply of drinking water which dependably
complies with such maximum contaminant levels; including accepted methods for quality
control and testing procedures to insure compliance with such levels and to insure
proper operation and maintenance of the system...
This section also authorizes EPA to require PWSs and laboratories to use EPA-approved
methods and quality assurance criteria for collecting and analyzing water samples.
Section 1445(a)(1)(A) of the SDWA requires that persons subject to the NPDWR
requirements
establish and maintain such records, make such reports, conduct such monitoring, and
provide such information as the Administrator may reasonably require by regulation to
assist the Administrator in establishing regulations under this subchapter, in determining
whether such person has acted or is acting in compliance with this subchapter...
4
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
2(b)
June 2010
Use/Users of the Data
Once compliance with the RTCR begins, each PWS maintains PWS-level records on the
analytical results of monitoring actions and corrective actions taken and of the reports or written
communications with the state regarding violations, assessments, corrective actions, and public
notification (see 40 CFR 141.31 and 141.33). PWSs will use the data collected from this ICR and
from the Microbial Rules ICR and PWSS ICR, when the rules goes into compliance, to:
Determine system-specific needs
Evaluate the effectiveness of treatment
Determine the integrity of the distribution system
Signal the possible presence of fecal contamination
Correct significant deficiencies
Alert the public through notices in the mass media or water bills when PWSs are not in
compliance with Federal and state regulations
States are required to maintain records compiled from PWS respondents (40 CFR
142.14). States can use these records to track PWS monitoring, compliance violations, and
enforcement activities. States can also track schedules for PWSs trying to achieve compliance.
States are required to report the number of violations to SDWIS, which will help them target
PWSs for compliance and take the necessary remedial action. SDWIS is a Federal information
system that allows EPA and the states to store and retrieve information over time. Trends in
compliance data can be evaluated at the PWS level, at the state level, and at the national program
level. Usually, these data are used by EPA for maintaining oversight of the drinking water
program (including supporting the Six-Year Review of NPDWRs mandated by SDWA) and for
supporting Federal enforcement actions in cases where states fail to enforce.
The states and EPA have a number of critical questions to answer as part of their
supervision of PWSs. Information and data collected from this ICR and from the Microbial
Rules ICR and PWSS ICR can be used to answer these questions, some of which are listed
below.
At the PWS level:
Does a PWS have Level 1 or Level 2 triggers requiring Level 1 or Level 2 assessments?
Does the result of a Level 1 or a Level 2 assessment indicate the presence of (a) sanitary
defect(s) that require(s) corrective actions?
For PWSs not in compliance, why are they not in compliance and how can compliance be
achieved?
5
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
What is the threat to public health of a PWS that is not in compliance?
At the national and state level:
What are the national and state compliance trends?
What changes in national policy or regulation may be needed to increase the national
compliance rate?
Is noncompliance a function of location, size, or other identifiable variable?
Requests for PWS data and related statistical analyses are frequent. Requests for SDWIS
data are often received under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Approximately 200 FOIA
requests are received per year. EPA also maintains an Internet access point for SDWIS data at
their “Envirofacts” Internet site.
6
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
3
NON-DUPLICATION, CONSULTATIONS, AND OTHER
COLLECTION CRITERIA
The following sections verify and affirm that this ICR satisfies the PRA requirements,
meets the OMB data-collection guidelines, has public support, and does not duplicate another
collection.
3(a)
Non-duplication
EPA has searched the Federal Information Locator System (FILS) in an effort to ensure
nonduplication of the data collection efforts. The information collected under the proposed
RTCR is needed to determine a PWS’s risk of microbial contamination and to evaluate the
PWS’s compliance. To the best of EPA’s knowledge, data required by this proposed rule are not
available from any other source.
3(b)
Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB
Since this ICR is part of a proposed rule, public notice is not required prior to its
submission to OMB. Instead, a notice for public comment for the ICR is included in the
preamble of the proposed RTCR. Based on public comment received on the proposed rule,
modifications will be made to the rule and underlying analyses prior to promulgation of the final
rule. Where appropriate, these modifications will also be reflected in this ICR. A full discussion
of public comments on the proposed RTCR, as well as EPA’s responses, will be provided in a
separate document which will be available in the public docket established for this rulemaking
once the final rule is published.
3(c)
Consultations
EPA noticed its intent to revise the 1989 TCR in July 2003 (68 FR 42908, July 18, 2003).
To support the revisions of the TCR, EPA held several outreach activities and consultations. One
of these outreach activities is a technical workshop that EPA held in Washington, DC, from
January 30 to February 1, 2007 to discuss available information on the current TCR and
available information regarding risks in distribution systems.
In June 2007, EPA established the Total Coliform Rule / Distribution System Advisory
Committee in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA),
to provide recommendations to EPA on revisions to the 1989 TCR and on what information
about distribution systems is needed to better understand and address public health impacts from
potential degradation of drinking water quality in distribution systems. The committee members
agreed on and signed the Agreement in Principle (AIP) that contains the advisory committee’s
recommendations on revisions to the TCR that will improve implementation while maintaining
or improving public health protection and distribution system water quality. The provisions of
the proposed RTCR are based on the AIP.
7
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
EPA has also committed in the AIP to hold a stakeholder meeting no less than once per
year to engage stakeholders in the development of the proposed RTCR. EPA held two
stakeholder meetings, the first one in April 2009 and the second one in May 2010, to provide
draft proposed regulation updates and an opportunity for stakeholders to provide feedback on the
development of the proposed RTCR.
As mandated by SDWA, EPA also consulted with the Science Advisory Board, the
National Drinking Water Advisory Council, and the Secretary of the US Department of Health
and Human Services on the proposed RTCR. EPA also consulted with Tribal governments in
accordance with Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination with Tribal
Governments. EPA also convened a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel (SBARP) to look at
the impacts of the proposed RTCR on small entities. A more detailed discussion on this latter
consultation can be found in Section 5(c) of this ICR. EPA considered the recommendations it
got from these consultations in developing the proposed RTCR.
3(d)
Effects of Less Frequent Collection
During the three-year period covered by this ICR, EPA requires no reporting and
recordkeeping associated with complying with the proposed RTCR.
For compliance with the proposed RTCR (which happens beyond the three years covered
by this ICR) EPA has determined that the monitoring frequencies for total coliforms and E. coli
required of PWSs under the proposed RTCR are appropriate since less frequent data collection
may fail to identify, in a timely manner, significant contaminant concentrations that may threaten
the health and safety of drinking water consumers. EPA has considered alternatives for a wide
range of frequency and burden estimates for data collection. EPA has selected the approach that
requires the least frequent collection possible while maintaining its public health protection
objectives.
3(e)
General Guidelines
This ICR was prepared in accordance with the November 2005 ICR Handbook prepared
by EPA’s Office of Environmental Information, Office of Information Collection, Collection
Strategies Division. The ICR Handbook provides the most current instructions for ICR
preparation to ensure compliance with the 1995 PRA amendments and OMB’s implementing
guidelines.
3(f)
Confidentiality
No confidential information will be collected as a result of this ICR.
3(g)
Sensitive Questions
No information of a sensitive nature will be collected as a result of this ICR.
8
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
4
June 2010
RESPONDENTS AND INFORMATION REQUESTED
The following sections provide information on the respondents and the information they
are requested to provide.
4(a)
Respondents/NAICS Codes
Under the proposed RTCR, respondents to the monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping
requirements include the operators and owners of PWSs, which include noncommunity water
systems (NCWSs). The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code for
investor-owned water systems is 22131; the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code is
4941. The NAICS Code for both publicly owned water systems and state agencies is 92411 and
the SIC Code is 9511. State officials serve in a role of respondent when reporting compliance
data to EPA.
PWSs are defined as those systems that provide piped water for human consumption and
have at least 15 service connections or regularly serve at least 25 people at least 60 days per year.
A community water system (CWS) is a PWS that serves at least 15 connections used by
year-round residents or regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents. NCWSs, by definition,
are all other PWSs. NCWSs include transient systems and non-transient systems. Non-transient
systems serve the same 25 people at least 6 months per year (40 CFR 141.2).
4(b)
Information Requested
4(b)(i) Data Items
States
During the first three years after rule promulgation, states need not comply with the
proposed RTCR since the compliance date is three years after promulgation. Therefore, EPA
requires no reporting and recordkeeping from states with regards to RTCR compliance. EPA,
however, expects states to prepare and submit their primacy applications during this period. In
addition to the general requirements contained in 40 CFR 142.16, EPA requires a state’s primacy
application to contain information specific to the RTCR. This information includes:
The baseline and reduced monitoring provisions of the proposed RTCR the state will
adopt and how the state will implement those provisions;
Written descriptions of the following:
o Frequency and process used to review and revise sample siting plans;
o Criteria for reduced monitoring;
o Process for implementing the new assessment and corrective action provisions of the
proposed RTCR;
9
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
o Criteria and process for invalidating routine or repeat samples;
o Criteria and process for approval of individuals allowed to conduct Level 1 and Level
2 assessments;
o Procedure for performing special monitoring evaluations during sanitary surveys for
ground water systems serving 1,000 persons or fewer to determine whether systems
are on an appropriate monitoring schedule;
o Process of identifying seasonal systems and determining their monitoring schedule
and start-up procedures;
o Additional criteria for reduced monitoring; and
o Procedures for seasonal systems to start-up operations at the beginning of each
system.
The following are the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for states beyond the
first three years after rule promulgation (when PWSs need to comply with the RTCR). The costs
and burden determination to comply with these requirements are not included in this ICR.
In addition to the reporting requirements specified in 40 CFR 142.15, the proposed
RTCR requires states to report the following to EPA (see proposed RTCR §142.15(c)(3)).
A list of systems that the state is allowing to monitor under a reduced monitoring
frequency.
In addition to those already specified in 40 CFR 142.14, states are required to keep
records of the following (see §142.14(a)(10)):
Any decision to waive or extend the 24-hour time limit for collecting samples following
either a total coliform-positive routine sample, invalidation, or a high turbidity
measurement;
Any decision to allow a system to waive the requirement for three routine samples the
month following a total coliform-positive sample;
Any decision to invalidate a total coliform-positive sample;
Completed and approved Level 1 and/or Level 2 assessments, including reports from the
system that corrective action has been completed;
Any decision to reduce the total coliform monitoring frequency for a community water
system serving 1,000 persons or fewer to less than once per month;
Any decision to reduce the total coliform monitoring frequency for a noncommunity
water system using only ground water and serving 1,000 persons or fewer to less than
once per quarter;
10
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Any decision to reduce the total coliform monitoring frequency for a noncommunity
water system using only ground water and serving more than 1,000 persons during any
month the system serves 1,000 persons or fewer; and
Any decision to allow a system to forgo E. coli testing of a total coliform-positive sample
if that system assumes that the total coliform-positive sample is E. coli- positive.
Public Water Systems
During the first three years after rule promulgation, PWSs need not comply with the
RTCR since the compliance date is three years after promulgation. Therefore, EPA requires no
reporting and recordkeeping from PWSs with regards to RTCR compliance. EPA, however,
expects that PWSs will start revising their sample siting plans as necessary so that they will be
available for state review and revision when the systems have to comply with the rule.
The following are the reporting and recordkeeping requirements for PWSs beyond the
first three years after rule promulgation (when PWSs need to comply with the RTCR). The costs
and burden determination to comply with these requirements are not included in this ICR.
In addition to the reporting requirements specified in 40 CFR 141.31, PWSs are required
by the proposed RTCR to report the following to the states (see §141.861(a)):
E. coli MCL violation by no later than the end of the next business day after it learns of
the violation, and provide public notification;
E. coli-positive sample by no later than the end of the next business day after the PWS
learns of the analytical result;
Treatment technique violation for total coliforms by no later than the end of the next
business day after the PWS learns of the violation. The PWS must provide public
notification;
Completion of each scheduled corrective action for corrections not completed by the time
of submission of the assessment form; and
11
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Monitoring violation within 10 days after the PWS discovers the violation. The PWS
must provide public notification.
In addition to the recordkeeping requirements for PWSs specified in 40 CFR 141.33,
PWSs are required by the proposed RTCR to keep records of the following (see §141.861(b)):
Any assessment form, documentation of corrective actions completed as a result of
assessments, or other available summary documentation of the sanitary defects and
corrective actions taken for state review.
4(b)(ii) Respondent Activities
States
During the first three years after rule promulgation, the only activities that take place are
state primacy application and start-up activities, which include:
Reading and understanding the rule;
Adopting the rule and developing state program that will support implementation of the
rule;
Modifying data management system;
Training staff; and
Reviewing PWS sample siting plans and providing recommendations for revisions to
PWSs.
Beyond the first three years, when PWSs need to comply with the RTCR, EPA expects
the states to be involved in the following incremental activities (note that these activities are not
part of the cost and burden determination for this ICR). Figure 4.1 shows the schedule of
information collection and other compliance activities under the proposed RTCR.
Tracking compliance;
Analyzing and reviewing PWS data;
Making determinations concerning PWS monitoring requirements;
Responding to PWSs with positive samples (for the calculations shown in Appendix A,
note that the net change in burden and costs for states to review PWSs monitoring results
12
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
is zero because the TCR methodology is calculated on a per PWS basis and the total
number of PWSs is the same for modeling under the TCR and proposed RTCR);
Recordkeeping;
Reviewing completed assessment forms and consulting with the PWS about the
assessment form;
Reviewing and coordinating with PWSs to determine the optimal corrective action to be
implemented; and
Providing consultation, reviewing the public notification certification, and filing the
report of the violation.
Public Water Systems
During the first three years after rule promulgation, EPA anticipates PWSs to perform
start-up activities, which include:
Reading and understanding the rule;
Planning, and mobilization; and
Revising existing sampling plans to identify sampling locations and collection schedules
that are representative of water throughout the distribution system.
Beyond the first three years, when PWSs need to comply with the RTCR, EPA
anticipates PWSs to be involved in the following incremental activities (note that these activities
are not part of the cost and burden determination for this ICR). Figure 4.1 shows the schedule for
information collection and other compliance activities under the proposed RTCR.
Conducting routine, additional routine, and repeat coliform monitoring.3
Completing a Level 1 assessment if the PWS experiences a Level 1 trigger, and
submitting a timetable to the state to identify sanitary defects detected, corrective actions
completed, and a timetable for any corrective actions not already completed.
Completing a Level 2 assessment if the PWS experiences a Level 2 trigger, and
submitting a timetable for any corrective actions not already completed.
3
For the calculations shown in Appendix A, note that the net change in reporting and recordkeeping burden
and costs for PWSs to submit monitoring results to States is zero because the TCR methodology is calculated on a
per PWS basis and the total number of PWSs is the same for modeling under the TCR and proposed RTCR.
13
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Correcting sanitary defects found through the performance of Level 1 or Level 2
assessments.4
Developing and distributing Tier 1 public notices when E. coli MCL violations occur.
4
For the calculations shown in Appendix A, note that only the net change in the number of corrective
actions performed under the proposed RTCR is accounted for. EPA estimates that additional corrective actions
would be performed for only 10% of the assessments undertaken as a result of the proposed RTCR. EPA estimates
that corrective actions found through Level 1 assessments would result in corrective actions that focus more on
transient solutions than on permanent fixes to the PWS. Corrective actions taken as a result of Level 2 assessments
are expected to find a higher proportion of structural/technical issues resulting in material fixes to the PWSs and
distribution system.
14
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Figure 4.1: Implementation Schedule
Year
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
State
Implementation
Revising Sampling Plan
Routine monitoring, Additional routine monitoring, Repeat Monitoring
Annual Site Visits
Level 1 and Level 2 Assessments
Correction Actions Based on Level 1 and Level 2 Assessments
Public Notification
PWS
Implementation
Revising Sampling Plan
Routine monitoring, Additional routine monitoring, Repeat Monitoring
Annual Site Visits
Level 1 and Level 2 Assessments
Correction Actions Based on Level 1 and Level 2 Assessments
Public Notification
Note: Activities occurring in Year 10 continue throughout the remaining years of analysis
15
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
5
INFORMATION COLLECTED -- AGENCY ACTIVITIES,
COLLECTION METHODOLOGY, AND INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT
The following sections describe EPA activities related to analyzing, maintaining, and
distributing the information collected.
5(a)
EPA Activities
The EPA will be responsible for promulgating the RTCR once it has been finalized and
overseeing its implementation. Implementation of monitoring requirements will rely extensively
on state governments in those states that have assumed primacy under section 1413 of the
SDWA and §142.16 of the proposed RTCR. The EPA will be involved in the following
activities:
Developing the RTCR and guidance materials;
Reviewing and analyzing data submissions from the states; and
Processing and maintaining the SDWIS.
These are all general activities that are covered under the PWSS Program ICR, and therefore, are
not included in the EPA burden and costs estimates for this ICR.
5(b)
Collection Methodology and Management
Upon compliance, states will send their records of PWSs’ violations and whether a PWS
had a sanitary survey to SDWIS. EPA will modify SDWIS and data verification procedures to
accommodate the new information from the proposed RTCR.
EPA will check data quality by doing the following:
Developing standard operating procedures for each rule;
Editing the data submitted for content and required format in SDWIS;
Sending rejected data back to the states for error corrections;
Requiring states to resubmit corrected data;
Data verification audit of states based on data verification protocol established by EPA;
and
Conducting a review of states annually for corrective actions.
16
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
EPA plans to modify its existing data verification process to:
Include the number of PWSs with discrepancies;
Include onsite verification in states and PWSs, if necessary, every 2 to 3 years;
Train states on data verification procedures so they can conduct self-audits;
Include timeliness reviews;
Incorporate proposed RTCR-related activities into EPA Regional quarterly/annual
reviews; and
Include a regional check with states within six months of the previous data verification.
SDWIS runs on an IBM ES9000 12 way processor using mainframe edit programs (in
JCL). EPA defines information requirements and states update the data in batch file mode in a
pre-defined format. The public may access the violations data in SDWIS through the Internet at
http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/sdwis/sdwis_query.html.
5(c)
Small Entity Flexibility
In developing this ICR (and for the subsequent renewal of the Microbial Rules ICR and
PWSS ICR), EPA considered the requirement of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (SBREFA) to minimize the burden of information collections on small entities.
EPA considers small entities to be PWSs serving fewer than 10,000 people (63 FR 44524,
August 19, 1998).
The proposed RTCR will have the greatest impact on small PWSs. Under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., as amended by SBREFA, EPA generally is required
to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the impact of a regulatory action on
small entities. To assess this impact, EPA conducted outreach to small entities and convened a
Small Business Advocacy Review Panel (SBARP) in February 2008 to obtain advice and
recommendations of representatives of the small entities that potentially would be subject to the
proposed rule’s requirements. These recommendations are discussed below.
5(c)(i) Small Business Advocacy Review Panel Recommendations
The Panel recommended to use total coliforms as a trigger for investigation and/or
corrective action, to balance monitoring requirements and costs with risk, to further differentiate
requirements with other related rules, and to consider reporting and recordkeeping costs in
estimating burden.
EPA considered the Panel’s recommendations in developing the proposed RTCR. The
proposed RTCR eliminates the MCLG and MCL for total coliforms and instead uses total
coliforms as an indicator of the potential pathway of contamination into the distribution system.
PWSs that may be vulnerable to fecal contamination (as indicated by their monitoring results)
17
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
are required to do an assessment and if necessary, appropriate corrective action. Other provisions
of the proposed RTCR also result in reduced costs for many small PWSs and address the
recommendations of the Panel mentioned previously. These provisions include:
Reduced routine monitoring for qualifying PWS serving 1,000 persons or fewer.
Reduced number of repeat samples required.
Reduced additional routine monitoring for PWS serving 4,100 or fewer people.
Reduced public notification requirements for all systems, including small systems.
Reductions in corrective actions over time as a result of enhanced system performance
for all small systems.
Furthermore, consistent with the Panel recommendation to evaluate which parameters are
most appropriate for routine monitoring and as potential triggers for investigative and corrective
actions, EPA is conducting a review of existing models for total coliform and E. coli analysis and
is evaluating its Alternative Test Procedure protocol for approving new methods. EPA is also
one of the founding members of a Research Information Collection Partnership that is
considering research and information needs to evaluate potential indicators of distribution system
contamination.
5(d)
Collection Schedule
The RTCR is scheduled to be promulgated in 2012, with monitoring beginning 3 years
after promulgation. Figure 4.1 illustrates the information collection periods for compliance with
the proposed RTCR over the first 10 years following rule promulgation.
18
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
6
June 2010
ESTIMATING BURDEN AND COST OF COLLECTION
The following sections discuss costs and burden for all information collection,
recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for the proposed RTCR.
6(a)
Estimating Respondent Burden and Cost
The following sections discuss the costs and burden faced by PWSs and states. Note that
the majority of the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting burden occurs beyond the 3-year
period of the ICR. Exhibits A.34 and A.37, located in Appendix A, include a ten-year time frame
showing the burden and costs beyond the initial period covered by the ICR. This reflects the
reality of rule implementation. Figure 6.1 presents a summary of estimated responses, burden,
and costs for the 3-year window of the ICR.
Figure 6.1: Average Annual Net Change Burden and Costs for the Proposed
RTCR ICR
Cost
Respondent Type
Annual Burden
Hours
Annual Labor
Cost
PWSs
States and
Territories
747,848
$
91,678
TOTAL
839,526
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual Capital
Cost
Total Annual
Cost
Annual
Responses
20,171,639
$
-
$
-
$
20,171,639
103,225
$
3,595,421
$
-
$
-
$
3,595,421
51,669
$
23,767,060
$
-
$
-
$
23,767,060
154,894
Notes:
1) Detail may not add exactly to total due to independent rounding.
2) "Annual Burden Hours" reflects an annual average for all system sizes over the 3-year ICR period.
6(a)(i) Burden and Cost to PWSs
Information collection activities of PWSs required under the proposed RTCR will result
in average annual net change national labor costs of $20.2 million and a corresponding annual
net change burden of 747,848 person-hours as shown in Figure 6.1 and in Exhibits A.34 and
A.37. The exhibits also include annual net change costs and burden up to 10 years following rule
promulgation.
The net change burden and costs are estimated for start-up activities, including reading
the rule and training staff. The assumptions and methodologies used in deriving these estimates
are discussed in the following section.
19
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
6(a)(i)(a)
June 2010
Start-Up Activities
Start-up activities are estimated at a one-time expense of $60.5 million (Exhibit A.37)
and 2.2 million burden hours (Exhibits A.34). Start-up activities include reading the final rule to
become familiar with the requirements and performing additional or transitional implementation
activities such as training staff to on rule requirements. Additionally, all PWSs will incur onetime costs to revise existing sampling plans to identify sampling locations and collection
schedules that are representative of water throughout the distribution system.
For costing purposes, EPA estimates the labor needs and hourly labor rates of PWSs and
states for two labor categories: managerial and technical. For PWSs, all analyses use labor rates
presented in EPA’s document, Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules5. The technical
and managerial wage rates vary with PWS size and include fringe benefits. To account for the
general composition of staff at PWSs of smaller sizes (e.g., PWSs serving 3,300 or fewer), EPA
uses only the technical rate. For PWSs serving more than 3,300 people, EPA uses a ratio of 80
percent technical labor to 20 percent managerial labor to arrive at a labor cost, or weighted labor
rate. A full description of the derivation of the labor rates used is provided in the Technology and
Cost Document for the Proposed Revised Total Coliform Rule6. The weighted labor rates ($2007)
are shown in Exhibit A.1.
6(a)(i)(b)
Annual Activities
In the tenth year of rule implementation, a net savings of $1.5 million (Exhibit A.37) and
0.09 million burden hours (Exhibit A.34) is expected for annual PWS activity costs and burden,
respectively. Included in this category are costs and burden to revise sampling plans; to conduct
routine monitoring, additional routine monitoring, and repeat monitoring; to perform Level 1 and
Level 2 assessments; to perform reporting and recordkeeping related to corrective actions; and to
provide public notification. The net change cost and burden estimates for PWS annual activities
are shown in Exhibits A.34 and A.37. These net change costs are for data collection and review
and will occur outside of the three years covered by this ICR.
6(a)(ii) Burden and Cost to States
Total annual average net change state labor cost is $3.6 million, and the annual average
net change burden is 91,678 hours for the three years covered by this ICR.
6(a)(ii)(a)
Start-Up Activities
States are estimated to incur a one-time cost of $10.8 million (Exhibit A.37) and a onetime burden of 275,033 hours (Exhibit A.34). For states, the administrative and field engineer
labor rates from the 2001 State Drinking Water Needs Analysis7 are used in the proposed RTCR
5
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Labor Costs for National Drinking Water Rules.
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Technology and Cost Document for the Proposed Revised
Total Coliform Rule. EPA 815-R-10-002.
Association of State Drinking Water Administrators (ASDWA). 2001. Drinking water program resource
needs assessment. Version 9. November 27, 2001.
6
20
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Economic Analysis (EA) (as used in the Ground Water Rule (GWR) EA8). These rates include a
60 percent overhead rate and were inflated to 2007$ using the Employee Cost Index (ECI). The
state labor rates in 2007$ are $39.22 for an administrative state employee and $43.58 for a state
field engineer. EPA assumes that the state field engineer would conduct annual site visits, and
the administrative state employee would work with PWSs on all remaining aspects of the
proposed RTCR. Because this separation between field engineer and administrative employee is
used, the 80/20 weighting ratio between technical and managerial rates is not used to develop
state costs.
6(a)(ii)(b)
Annual Activities
In the tenth year after promulgation, a net savings of $0.54 million (Exhibit A.37) and
0.01 million burden hours (Exhibit A.34) is expected annually for states to respond to positive
sample results; to review completed assessment forms required to be filed by PWSs and consult
with PWSs about their assessment form; to review and coordinate with PWSs to determine the
appropriate corrective action to be implemented; and to provide consultation, review the public
notification certification, and file the report of the violation. States must also submit information
to SDWIS to assist both EPA and states in tracking PWS compliance (see Exhibits A.34 and
A.37).
State net change costs and burden for activities occurring outside of the 3-year ICR
window are calculated in the same way as state net change start-up costs and burden. The
administrative state employee labor rate is used for all rule activities under the proposed RTCR.
6(b)
Time Frame for Cost and Burden Estimates
To provide a coherent understanding of how the burden for the rule will occur, the time
frame for rule implementation is described below.
In the first 3 years, EPA has estimated that states will adopt regulations for transitional
implementation of the proposed RTCR and will apply for program primacy approval, and that
states and PWSs will conduct transitional start-up activities for implementing the proposed
RTCR, such as training, and data management system modifications.
States are expected to incur one-time costs to review sampling plans and recommend any
revisions to PWSs. PWSs are expected to revise sampling plans before monitoring begins. For
modeling purposes costs are split between years 2 and 3 of the 25-year compliance period
(monitoring is required starting in year 4).
Beginning in the fourth year following promulgation, PWSs would begin routine,
additional routine, and repeat monitoring. Additionally, EPA expects that, beginning in the
fourth year, PWSs would be required to correct sanitary defects found through the performance
of Level 1 or Level 2 assessments. Reporting and recordkeeping burden from corrective actions
resulting from Level 1 and Level 2 assessments would also begin in the fourth year following
promulgation. For each corrective action performed, states would incur recordkeeping and
8
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Economic Analysis for the Final Ground Water Rule. EPA815-R-06.014.
21
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
reporting burden to review and coordinate with PWSs. Revised public notification activities
would also begin in the fourth year following promulgation.
6(c)
Estimating EPA Burden and Cost
EPA’s costs include those incurred by both regional offices and headquarters to process,
analyze, and maintain SDWIS data. These costs cannot be derived on a per rule basis but are
presented as an overall program cost in the PWSS Program ICR. Headquarters personnel who
design and administer SDWIS believe that the net additional cost of the regulations proposed
here is not significantly greater than that of the PWSS Program.
The EPA also performs the role attributed to states and territories, for those states and
territories over which it has primacy. This cost is included as part of the total burden and cost for
states.
6(d)
Respondent Universe
There are a total of 154,837 PWSs and 57 states and territories considered for this ICR.
6(e)
Bottom Line Burden Hours and Costs
This section provides a description of bottom line estimates for implementation of the
proposed RTCR. The bottom line net change burden hours and costs for PWSs and states are the
summaries of the hours and costs collectively incurred for all additional activities under the
proposed RTCR in comparison to the current TCR. The first part of this section describes the
estimated average annual net change costs and hourly burdens for respondents to the rule. The
second part discusses the potential net change cost and burden to EPA. Figure 6.2 presents a
summary of the average annual net change respondent burden over three years for PWSs and
states. All additional exhibits relating to this ICR are in Appendix A.
22
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Figure 6.2: Bottom Line Average Annual Net Change Burden and
Costs for the 3-Year ICR Period
Annual Number of
Respondents
51,669 (=)
51,612 (+) PWSs
57
Total Annual Responses
States
154,894 (=)
103,225 (+) Public water system responses
51,669
Annual Number of Responses
per Public Water System
State responses
2.00 (=)
103,225
(/)
51,612
Annual Number of Responses
per State
Total annual number of PWS respondents (from above)
906.5 (=)
51,669
(/)
57
Total Annual Respondent
Burden Hours
Hours per Response for Public
Water Systems
839,526 (=)
747,848 (+) PWS hours
91,678
State hours
7.2 (=)
747,848
(/)
Total PWS annual hours (from above)
Total PWS responses (from above)
1.77 (=)
91,678
(/)
51,669
Total state annual hours (from above)
Total state responses (from above)
$0 (=)
Annual O&M and Capital Cost
Total Annual Respondent Cost
Total annual state responses (from above)
Total annual number of state respondents (from above)
103,225
Hours per Response for States
Total annual PWS responses (from above)
$0 (+) PWS O&M costs
$0
State O&M costs
$23,767,060 (=)
$20,171,639 (+) PWS costs
$3,595,421
State costs
Total Annual Hours (resp. plus
Agency)
Total Annual Cost (resp. plus
Agency)
839,526 (=)
839,526 (+) Total respondent hours (from above)
0
Total EPA hours
$23,767,060 (=)
$23,767,060 (+) Total respondent cost
$0
Total EPA cost
Notes:
1) Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.
6(e)(i) Bottom Line Burden and Cost Estimates for Respondents
For this ICR, EPA estimates that PWSs will have an annual net change respondent
burden of 747,848 hours and an annual net change respondent costs of $20.2 million. EPA
estimates that states will have an annual net change respondent burden of 91,678 hours and a
23
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
corresponding average annual net change respondent costs of $3.6 million. Therefore, the total
average annual net change respondent burden is estimated to be 839,526 burden hours and the
corresponding total average annual net change respondent labor costs are estimated to be $23.8
million. See Figure 6.2. There are neither capital costs nor O&M costs during the 3-year ICR
period.
6(e)(ii) Bottom Line Estimate for EPA
As mentioned previously in Section 6c, the costs and burden incurred by EPA to process,
analyze, and maintain SDWIS are presented as part of the PWSS Program ICR. Additional costs
that are likely to be incurred by EPA for tribes and the state of Wyoming are included in the tally
for the costs and burden to states and territories because most costs are estimated on a per system
basis and because the number of PWSs on tribal land or in Wyoming affected by various
provisions of the rule is uncertain.
6(f)
Reasons for Change in Burden
The primary goal of the proposed RTCR is to achieve the objectives of the 1989 TCR
more effectively and efficiently, taking into account the changes in regulatory framework for
implementing the SDWA over the past 20 years and experience with the TCR since it was
promulgated in 1989. National burden estimates increase primarily because PWS requirements
are being strengthened under the proposed RTCR.
6(g)
Burden Statement
The annual net change public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 14.5 hours per PWS respondent per year and 1608.4 hours
per state respondent per year for the 3-year ICR period.9
Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by people to
generate, maintain, retain, disclose, or provide information to or for a Federal Agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology,
and PWSs for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able
to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection
of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a request for information collection unless
it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s
regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.
To comment on EPA's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden
estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of
automated collection techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket
ID Number EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0878, which is available for online viewing at
9
The average burden hours were calculated by dividing the annual burden hours (from Figure 6.1) by the
annual number of respondents (from Figure 6.2), e.g., for PWSs, 747,848 ÷51,612 =.14.5.
24
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 5661744, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is (202) 566-2426. An electronic version
of the public docket is available at www.regulations.gov. This site can be used to submit or view
public comments, to access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access
those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select
“search,” then key in the Docket ID Number identified above. Also, you can send comments to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th
Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Please include the EPA
Docket ID Number (EPA-HQ-OW-2008-0878) and the OMB Control Number 2040-AD94 in
any correspondence.
25
Appendix A
Matrix of Appendix A Contents
Rule Component
Labor Rates
Implementation
Implementation and Annual
Administration
Exhibit Description
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (AIP)
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (TCR)
State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (AIP)
State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (TCR)
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (AIP)
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (TCR)
Revising Sampling Plan
State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (AIP)
State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (TCR)
Lab Costs (AIP)
Monitoring
Lab Costs (TCR)
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (AIP)
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (TCR)
Annual Site Visits
State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (AIP)
State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (TCR)
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (AIP)
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (TCR)
Level 1 and 2 Assessments
State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (AIP)
State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates (TCR)
PWS Compliance Forecast (AIP)
PWS Compliance Forecast (TCR)
Corrective Actions
Weighted R&R Burden Estimates
Weighted R&R Unit Cost Estimates
PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates
Public Notification
State Burden and Cost Estimates
Respondents, Year by Year by Activity (AIP)
Respondents, Year by Year by Activity (TCR)
AIP Net Change Respondents, Year by Year by Activity
Responses, Year by Year by Activity (AIP)
Responses, Year by Year by Activity (TCR)
AIP Net Change Responses, Year by Year by Activity
Burden, Year by Year by Activity (AIP)
Burden, Year by Year by Activity (TCR)
AIP Net Change Burden, Year by Year by Activity
Costs, Year by Year by Activity (AIP)
Costs, Year by Year by Activity (TCR)
AIP Net Change Costs, Year by Year by Activity
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
Exhibit Number
A.1
A.2
A.3
A.4
A.5
A.6
A.7
A.8
A.9
A.10
A.11
A.12
A.13
A.14
A.15
A.16
A.17
A.18
A.19
A.20
A.21
A.22
A.23
A.24
A.25
A.26
A.27
A.28
A.29
A.30
A.31
A.32
A.33
A.34
A.35
A.36
A.37
June 2010
Exhibit A.1 Labor Rates
PWS Labor Rates
PWS Size (population served)
< 100
101 - 500
501 - 1,000
1,001 - 4,100
4,101 - 33,000
33,001 - 96,000
96,001 - 500,000
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Weighted Labor Rate ($/hour)
$
25.10
$
27.03
$
28.96
$
29.73
$
36.00
$
36.39
$
41.01
$
41.01
$
41.01
Note: Labor rates for each size category are assumed to be the same regardless
of system type (CWS, NTNCWS, and TNCWS).
Source: Proposed RTCR T&C Document (EPA 815-R-10-002).
State Labor Rates
Cost Assumptions: Labor Rate Components
Cost Element
State Employee - Administrative
State Employee - Field Engineer
Base Hourly Labor Cost
A
$
33.60
$
37.34
ECI in Year of Data
B
ECI 2007
C
92.7
92.7
2007 Labor Cost
D=A*(C/B)
108.2 $
39.22
108.2 $
43.58
Sources:
(A) Economic Analysis for the Final Ground Water Rule (USEPA. 2006. EPA-815-R-06.014).
(B) ECI for state employee from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) (2008) from 2003 (State and local government; Total compensation; All workers, not seasonally adjusted). www.bls.gov.
(C) ECI for state employee from BLS (2008) from 2007 (State and local government; Total compensation; All workers, not seasonally adjusted). www.bls.gov.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.2 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation Activities (AIP)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
A
Read and
Understand Rule
(hours/system)
B
Planning and
Mobilization
(hours/system)
C
Unit Burden
B+C
Unit Cost
D=A*(B+C)
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
301.20
101-500
$
27.03
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
324.36
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
347.52
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
356.76
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
432.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
436.68
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
492.12
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
4.0
4.0
8.0
8.0
12.0
12.0
$
$
492.12
492.12
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
301.20
101-500
$
27.03
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
324.36
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
347.52
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
356.76
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
432.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
436.68
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
492.12
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
4.0
4.0
8.0
8.0
12.0
12.0
$
$
492.12
492.12
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
301.20
101-500
$
27.03
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
324.36
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
347.52
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
356.76
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
432.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
436.68
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
492.12
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
4.0
4.0
8.0
8.0
12.0
12.0
$
$
492.12
492.12
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
301.20
101-500
$
27.03
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
324.36
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
347.52
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
356.76
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
432.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
436.68
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
492.12
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
4.0
4.0
8.0
8.0
12.0
12.0
$
$
492.12
492.12
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
301.20
101-500
$
27.03
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
324.36
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
347.52
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
356.76
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
432.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
436.68
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
492.12
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
4.0
4.0
8.0
8.0
12.0
12.0
$
$
492.12
492.12
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
301.20
101-500
$
27.03
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
324.36
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
347.52
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
356.76
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
432.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
436.68
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
492.12
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
492.12
> 1 Million
$
41.01
4.0
8.0
12.0
$
492.12
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
(B), (C) EPA estimates based on best professional judgement.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.3 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation Activities (TCR)
Read and
Labor Cost (per Understand Rule
PWS Size
(hours/system)
hour)
(Population
A
B
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
101-500
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
Planning and
Mobilization
(hours/system)
C
Unit Burden
B+C
Unit Cost
D=A*(B+C)
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
-
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
101-500
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
-
-
-
33,001-96,000
96,001-500,000
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
$
36.39
41.01
41.01
41.01
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
101-500
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
-
-
-
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-4,100
4,101-33,000
33,001-96,000
96,001-500,000
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
27.03
28.96
29.73
36.00
36.39
41.01
41.01
41.01
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
$
$
$
-
-
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
101-500
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
96,001-500,000
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
$
41.01
41.01
41.01
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-4,100
4,101-33,000
33,001-96,000
96,001-500,000
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Notes:
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25.10
27.03
28.96
29.73
36.00
36.39
41.01
41.01
41.01
-
(B), (C) Under the TCR option, systems will not incur additional implementation burden to implement the proposed
RTCR.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.4 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation Activities & Annual Administ
(AIP)
State Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation Activities (AIP)
Compliance Activity
Read and Understand Rule
Regulation Adoption and Program Development
Initial Laboratory Certification
Modify Data Management Systems
PWS Training and Technical Assistance
Staff Training
Per State Total
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
Notes:
Detail may not add due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit A.1
$
$
$
$
$
$
Labor Cost
(per hour)
A
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
Hours
B
15
260
520
520
130
1,445
82,365
FTEs
C=B/2,080
0.01
0.13
0.25
0.25
0.06
Cost
D=A*B
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
588
10,197
20,393
20,393
5,098
56,670
3,230,201
(B) Labor hours for start-up activities are based on GWR estimates. Because the proposed RTCR is a revision of the
existing TCR, one fourth of the State unit start up burden from GWR is used in the proposed RTCR.
(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
State Burden and Cost Estimates for
Annual Administrative Activities (AIP)
Annual Administrative Activities
Compliance Activity
Coordination with EPA
Lab Certification
Ongoing Technical Assistance
SDWIS Reporting
Recordkeeping
Staff Training
Per State Total
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
Notes:
Detail may not add due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
$
$
$
$
$
$
Labor Cost
(per hour)
Hours
FTEs
Cost
A
B
C=B/2,080
-
D=A*B
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
(B) Under the AIP, states will not incur additional annual administration burden for ongoing implementation of the
proposed RTCR.
(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.5 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation Activities & Annual Administ
(TCR)
State Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation Activities (TCR)
Labor Cost
(per hour)
A
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
Hours
FTEs
Cost
B
C=B/2,080
D=A*B
Compliance Activity
Read and Understand Rule $
$
$
Regulation Adoption and Program Development $
$
Initial Laboratory Certification $
$
Modify Data Management Systems $
PWS Training and Technical Assistance $
$
$
Staff Training $
Per State Total
$
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
$
Notes:
Detail may not add due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
(B) Under the TCR, states will not incur additional implementation burden to implement the proposed RTCR.
(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
-
State Burden and Cost Estimates for
Annual Administrative Activities (TCR)
Annual Administrative Activities
Compliance Activity
Coordination with EPA
Lab Certification
Ongoing Technical Assistance
SDWIS Reporting
Recordkeeping
Staff Training
Per State Total
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
Notes:
Detail may not add due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
$
$
$
$
$
$
Labor Cost
(per hour)
Hours
FTEs
Cost
A
B
C=B/2,080
-
D=A*B
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
(B) Under the TCR, states will not incur additional annual administration burden for ongoing implementation of the
proposed RTCR.
(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.6 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for
Revising Sampling Plan (AIP)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
A
Revise Sampling
Plan
(hours/system)
B
Unit Cost
C=A*B
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
2.0
$
50.20
101-500
$
27.03
2.0
$
54.06
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
$
115.84
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
$
118.92
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
6.0
$
216.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
8.0
$
291.12
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
8.0
$
328.08
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
8.0
8.0
$
$
328.08
328.08
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
2.0
$
50.20
101-500
2.0
$
54.06
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
$
115.84
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
$
118.92
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
6.0
$
216.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
8.0
$
291.12
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
8.0
$
328.08
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
8.0
8.0
$
$
328.08
328.08
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
2.0
$
50.20
101-500
$
27.03
2.0
$
54.06
115.84
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
$
118.92
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
6.0
$
216.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
8.0
$
291.12
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
8.0
$
328.08
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
8.0
8.0
$
$
328.08
328.08
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
2.0
$
50.20
101-500
$
27.03
2.0
$
54.06
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
$
115.84
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
$
118.92
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
6.0
$
216.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
8.0
$
291.12
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
8.0
$
328.08
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
8.0
8.0
$
$
328.08
328.08
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
2.0 $
50.20
101-500
54.06
$
27.03
2.0
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
$
115.84
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
$
118.92
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
6.0
$
216.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
8.0
$
291.12
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
8.0
$
328.08
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
8.0
8.0
$
$
328.08
328.08
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
2.0
$
50.20
101-500
$
27.03
2.0
$
54.06
501-1,000
$
28.96
4.0
$
115.84
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4.0
$
118.92
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
6.0
$
216.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
8.0
$
291.12
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
8.0
$
328.08
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
8.0
$
328.08
> 1 Million
$
41.01
8.0
$
328.08
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
(B) Labor hours for revising sampling plan reflect EPA estimate.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.7 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for
Revising Sampling Plan (TCR)
Revise Sampling
PWS Size
Labor Cost (per
Plan
(Population
hour)
(hours/system)
B
A
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
101-500
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
101-500
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
Unit Cost
C=A*B
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
$
101-500
$
27.03
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
$
> 1 Million
$
41.01
$
-
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
$
101-500
$
27.03
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
$
> 1 Million
$
41.01
$
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
$
101-500
$
27.03
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
$
> 1 Million
$
41.01
$
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
$
101-500
$
27.03
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
$
> 1 Million
$
41.01
$
Notes:
(B) Under the TCR, systems are not required to revise their sampling plans.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.8 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for
Revising Sampling Plan (AIP)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
A
Review and Revise
Sampling Plan
(hours/system)
B
Unit Cost
C=A*B
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
39.22
39.22
4.0
4.0
$
$
156.87
156.87
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
101-500
1.0
$
39.22
$
39.22
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
39.22
39.22
4.0
4.0
$
$
156.87
156.87
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
39.22
39.22
4.0
4.0
$
$
156.87
156.87
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
39.22
39.22
4.0
4.0
$
$
156.87
156.87
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0 $
39.22
101-500
39.22
$
39.22
1.0
$
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
39.22
39.22
4.0
4.0
$
$
156.87
156.87
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
(B) Labor hours for reviewing and revising sampling plan reflect EPA estimate.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.9 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for
Revising Sampling Plan (TCR)
Review and Revise
Labor Cost (per
Sampling Plan
PWS Size
hour)
(hours/system)
(Population
A
B
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
101-500
$
39.22
501-1,000
$
39.22
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
500,001-1 Million $
39.22
> 1 Million
$
39.22
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
101-500
$
39.22
501-1,000
$
39.22
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
500,001-1 Million $
39.22
> 1 Million
$
39.22
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
Unit Cost
C=A*B
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
$
101-500
$
39.22
$
501-1,000
$
39.22
$
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
$
-
4,101-33,000
33,001-96,000
96,001-500,000
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
-
$
$
$
$
$
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
39.22
-
$
$
$
$
$
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
$
101-500
$
39.22
$
501-1,000
$
39.22
$
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
$
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
$
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
$
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
$
500,001-1 Million $
39.22
$
> 1 Million
$
39.22
$
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
$
101-500
$
39.22
$
501-1,000
$
39.22
$
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
$
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
$
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
$
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
$
500,001-1 Million $
39.22
$
> 1 Million
$
39.22
$
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
$
101-500
$
39.22
$
501-1,000
$
39.22
$
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
$
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
$
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
$
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
$
500,001-1 Million $
39.22
$
> 1 Million
$
39.22
$
Notes:
-
-
-
(B) Reviewing and revising sampling plans is not required under the TCR.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.10 Lab Costs by Size Category (AIP)
Routine with Additional Monitoring
(Yrs 4-25: SW systems, GW >1,000)
Routine Monitoring
System Size
(Population
Served)
Unit Burden
Unit Cost (Labor) Unit Cost (O&M)
A
B
C
Unit Burden
Routine with Additional Monitoring Yrs 4-8 (GW <1,000)
Unit Cost (Labor) Unit Cost (O&M)
D
F
E
Unit Burden
Unit Cost (Labor) Unit Cost (O&M)
G
H
I
Routine with Additional Monitoring Yrs 9-25 (GW
<1,000)
Unit Burden
Unit Cost (Labor) Unit Cost (O&M)
J
K
L
Repeat Monitoring
Unit Burden
Unit Cost (Labor) Unit Cost (O&M)
M
N
O
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
101-500
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30
$
27.49
0.75 $
22.30
$
27.49
0.75 $
22.30
$
27.49
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
101-500
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
27.49
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
101-500
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
27.49
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
101-500
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
27.49
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
101-500
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
27.49
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
37.99
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
0.50 $
12.55
$
27.46
101-500
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
38.04
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
0.50 $
13.52
$
27.47
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
38.09
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
0.75 $
21.72
$
27.49
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
30.15
0.75 $
22.30
$
27.49
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
0.75 $
27.00
$
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
1.00 $
36.39
$
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
1.45 $
59.46
$
11.62
Source:
Unit burden and costs derived from Proposed RTCR T&C Document.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.11 Lab Costs by Size Category (TCR)
Routine Monitoring
Unit Cost
System Size
Unit
Burden
(Labor)
Unit Cost (O&M)
(Population
Served)
A
B
C
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55 $
37.99
101-500
0.50 $
13.52 $
38.04
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72 $
38.09
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30 $
27.49
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00 $
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39 $
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55 $
37.99
101-500
0.50 $
13.52 $
38.04
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72 $
38.09
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30 $
30.15
27.00 $
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39 $
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55 $
37.99
101-500
0.50 $
13.52 $
38.04
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72 $
38.09
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30 $
30.15
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00 $
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39 $
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55 $
37.99
101-500
0.50 $
13.52 $
38.04
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72 $
38.09
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30 $
30.15
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00 $
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39 $
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55 $
37.99
101-500
0.50 $
13.52 $
38.04
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72 $
38.09
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30 $
30.15
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00 $
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39 $
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
> 1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
0.50 $
12.55 $
37.99
101-500
0.50 $
13.52 $
38.04
501-1,000
0.75 $
21.72 $
38.09
1,001-4,100
0.75 $
22.30 $
30.15
4,101-33,000
0.75 $
27.00 $
25.40
33,001-96,000
1.00 $
36.39 $
17.75
96,001-500,000
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
500,001-1 Million
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
1.45 $
59.46 $
11.62
> 1 Million
Source:
Routine with Additional Monitoring
Unit Burden
Unit Cost
(Labor)
D
E
Repeat Monitoring
Unit Cost (O&M)
F
Unit Burden
G
Unit Cost (Labor)
H
Unit Cost (O&M)
I
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25.35
25.36
25.37
25.37
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.14
26.15
26.16
27.49
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25.35
25.36
25.37
25.37
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.14
26.15
26.16
27.49
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25.35
25.36
25.37
25.37
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.14
26.15
26.16
27.49
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25.35
25.36
25.37
25.37
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.14
26.15
26.16
27.49
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25.35
25.36
25.37
25.37
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.14
26.15
26.16
27.49
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25.35
25.36
25.37
25.37
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
0.50
0.50
0.75
0.75
0.75
1.00
1.45
1.45
1.45
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
12.55
13.52
21.72
22.30
27.00
36.39
59.46
59.46
59.46
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
26.14
26.15
26.16
27.49
25.40
17.75
11.62
11.62
11.62
Unit burden and costs derived from Proposed RTCR T&C Document1.
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Technology and Cost Document for the Proposed Revised Total Coliform Rule. EPA 815-R-10-002.
1
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.12 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for
Annual Site Visits (AIP)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
A
Annual Site Visit
(hours/PWS)
B
Unit Cost
C=A*B
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
23.0
$
577.30
101-500
$
27.03
23.0
$
621.69
501-1,000
$
28.96
24.0
$
695.04
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
48.0
$
1,427.04
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
121.0
$
4,403.19
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
> 1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
23.0
$
577.30
101-500
$
27.03
23.0
$
621.69
501-1,000
$
28.96
24.0
$
695.04
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
48.0
$
1,427.04
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
121.0
$
4,403.19
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
> 1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
21.0 $
527.10
101-500
$
27.03
21.0
$
567.63
608.16
501-1,000
$
28.96
21.0
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
29.0
$
862.17
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
121.0
$
4,403.19
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
> 1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
21.0 $
527.10
101-500
567.63
$
27.03
21.0
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
21.0
$
608.16
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
29.0
$
862.17
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
121.0
$
4,403.19
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
> 1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
21.0
$
527.10
101-500
$
27.03
21.0
$
567.63
501-1,000
$
28.96
21.0
$
608.16
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
29.0
$
862.17
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
121.0
$
4,403.19
10,334.52
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
252.0
$
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
> 1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
21.0 $
527.10
101-500
567.63
$
27.03
21.0
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
21.0
$
608.16
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
29.0
$
862.17
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
121.0
$
4,403.19
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
> 1 Million
$
41.01
252.0
$
10,334.52
Notes:
Under the AIP, only PWSs conducting annual routine monitoring are required to
undergo annual site visits.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
(B) Labor hours for revising sampling plan reflect EPA estimate.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.13 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for
Annual Site Visits (TCR)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
Annual Site Visit
(hours/PWS)
Unit Cost
A
B
C=A*B
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
-
$
-
101-500
$
27.03
-
$
-
501-1,000
$
28.96
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
-
$
-
101-500
$
27.03
-
$
-
501-1,000
$
28.96
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
$
-
101-500
$
27.03
-
$
-
501-1,000
$
28.96
-
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
$
-
101-500
-
$
27.03
-
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
-
$
-
101-500
$
27.03
-
$
-
501-1,000
$
28.96
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
$
-
101-500
-
$
27.03
-
$
501-1,000
$
28.96
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
$
-
Notes:
(B) Under the TCR, PWSs are not required to undergo annual site visits.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.14 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for
Annual Site Visits (AIP)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
Annual Site Visit
(hours/PWS)
Unit Cost
A
B
C=A*B
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
43.58
23.0
$
1,002.42
101-500
$
43.58
23.0
$
1,002.42
501-1,000
$
43.58
24.0
$
1,046.00
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
48.0
$
2,092.01
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
71.0
$
3,094.43
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
121.0
$
5,273.60
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
> 1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
43.58
23.0
$
1,002.42
101-500
$
43.58
23.0
$
1,002.42
501-1,000
$
43.58
24.0
$
1,046.00
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
48.0
$
2,092.01
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
71.0
$
3,094.43
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
121.0
$
5,273.60
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
> 1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
43.58
21.0 $
915.25
101-500
915.25
$
43.58
21.0
$
501-1,000
$
43.58
21.0
$
915.25
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
29.0
$
1,263.92
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
71.0
$
3,094.43
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
121.0
$
5,273.60
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
> 1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
43.58
21.0 $
915.25
101-500
915.25
$
43.58
21.0
$
501-1,000
$
43.58
21.0
$
915.25
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
29.0
$
1,263.92
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
71.0
$
3,094.43
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
121.0
$
5,273.60
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
> 1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
43.58
21.0
$
915.25
101-500
$
43.58
21.0
$
915.25
501-1,000
$
43.58
21.0
$
915.25
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
29.0
$
1,263.92
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
71.0
$
3,094.43
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
121.0
$
5,273.60
10,983.04
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
252.0
$
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
> 1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
43.58
21.0 $
915.25
101-500
915.25
$
43.58
21.0
$
501-1,000
$
43.58
21.0
$
915.25
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
29.0
$
1,263.92
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
71.0
$
3,094.43
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
121.0
$
5,273.60
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
> 1 Million
$
43.58
252.0
$
10,983.04
Notes:
Under the AIP, states are only required to conduct annual site visits for systems
conducting annual routine monitoring.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
(B) Labor hours for revising sampling plan reflect EPA estimate.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.15 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for
Annual Site Visits (TCR)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
Annual Site Visit
(hours/PWS)
Unit Cost
A
B
C=A*B
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
43.58
-
$
-
101-500
$
43.58
-
$
-
501-1,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
-
$
-
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
43.58
101-500
$
43.58
-
$
-
501-1,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
43.58
$
-
101-500
$
43.58
-
$
-
501-1,000
$
43.58
-
$
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
43.58
$
-
101-500
-
$
43.58
-
$
501-1,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
43.58
-
$
-
101-500
$
43.58
-
$
-
501-1,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
-
$
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
43.58
$
-
101-500
-
$
43.58
-
$
501-1,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
1,001-4,100
$
43.58
-
$
-
4,101-33,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
33,001-96,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
96,001-500,000
$
43.58
-
$
-
500,001-1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
> 1 Million
$
43.58
-
$
-
Notes:
(B) Under the TCR, states are not required to conduct annual site visits.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.16 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Level 1 and Level 2 Assessments (AIP)
Level 1 Assessments
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Non-Acute Trigger
(single trigger)
Labor Cost (per
(hours)
hour)
A
Level 2 Assessments
Unit Cost
B
C=A*B
Acute Violations
(hours)
D
Unit Cost
Level 2 Triggers
(triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
(hours)
E=A*D
F
Unit Cost
G=A*F
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
19.0
$
476.90
23.0
$
577.30
22.0
$
552.20
101-500
$
27.03
19.0
$
513.57
23.0
$
621.69
22.0
$
594.66
501-1,000
$
28.96
20.0
$
579.20
24.0
$
695.04
23.0
$
666.08
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
31.0
$
921.63
48.0
$
1,427.04
46.0
$
1,367.58
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
41.0
$
1,476.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
69.0
$
2,484.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
68.0
$
2,474.52
121.0
$
4,403.19
116.0
$
4,221.24
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0 $
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0 $
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
> 1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0 $
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
19.0
$
476.90
23.0
$
577.30
22.0
$
552.20
101-500
$
27.03
19.0
$
513.57
23.0
$
621.69
22.0
$
594.66
501-1,000
$
28.96
20.0
$
579.20
24.0
$
695.04
23.0
$
666.08
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
31.0
$
921.63
48.0
$
1,427.04
46.0
$
1,367.58
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
41.0
$
1,476.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
69.0
$
2,484.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
68.0
$
2,474.52
121.0
$
4,403.19
116.0
$
4,221.24
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
> 1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
7.0
$
175.70
21.0
$
527.10
9.0
$
225.90
101-500
$
27.03
7.0
$
189.21
21.0
$
567.63
9.0
$
243.27
501-1,000
$
28.96
7.0
$
202.72
21.0
$
608.16
9.0
$
260.64
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
8.0
$
237.84
29.0
$
862.17
10.0
$
297.30
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
41.0
$
1,476.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
69.0
$
2,484.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
68.0
$
2,474.52
121.0
$
4,403.19
116.0
$
4,221.24
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
> 1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
7.0
$
175.70
21.0
$
527.10
9.0
$
225.90
101-500
$
27.03
7.0
$
189.21
21.0
$
567.63
9.0
$
243.27
501-1,000
$
28.96
7.0
$
202.72
21.0
$
608.16
9.0
$
260.64
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
8.0
$
237.84
29.0
$
862.17
10.0
$
297.30
2,484.00
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
41.0
$
1,476.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
69.0
$
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
68.0
$
2,474.52
121.0
$
4,403.19
116.0
$
4,221.24
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
> 1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
7.0
$
175.70
21.0
$
527.10
9.0
$
225.90
101-500
$
27.03
7.0
$
189.21
21.0
$
567.63
9.0
$
243.27
260.64
501-1,000
$
28.96
7.0
$
202.72
21.0
$
608.16
9.0
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
8.0
$
237.84
29.0
$
862.17
10.0
$
297.30
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
41.0
$
1,476.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
69.0
$
2,484.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
68.0
$
2,474.52
121.0
$
4,403.19
116.0
$
4,221.24
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
> 1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
7.0
$
175.70
21.0
$
527.10
9.0
$
225.90
101-500
$
27.03
7.0
$
189.21
21.0
$
567.63
9.0
$
243.27
501-1,000
$
28.96
7.0
$
202.72
21.0
$
608.16
9.0
$
260.64
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
8.0
$
237.84
29.0
$
862.17
10.0
$
297.30
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
41.0
$
1,476.00
71.0
$
2,556.00
69.0
$
2,484.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
68.0
$
2,474.52
121.0
$
4,403.19
116.0
$
4,221.24
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
> 1 Million
$
41.01
159.0
$
6,520.59
252.0
$
10,334.52
238.0
$
9,760.38
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
(B), (D), (F) Proposed RTCR T&C Document1.
1
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Technology and Cost Document for the Proposed Revised Total Coliform Rule. EPA 815-R-10-002.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.17 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Level 1 and Level 2 Assessments (TCR)
Activities Similar to Level 1 Assessments
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
A
Non-Acute Violations (single
violation) (hours)
B
Activities Similar to Level 2 Assessments
Acute Violations
(hours)
D
Unit Cost
C=A*B
Unit Cost
E=A*D
Non-Acute
Violations (multiple
violations) (hours)
F
Unit Cost
G=A*F
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
$
11.0
$
276.10
$
14.0
$
351.40
$
14.0
$
351.40
101-500
$
27.03
$
11.0
$
297.33
$
14.0
$
378.42
$
14.0
$
378.42
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
13.0
$
376.48
$
15.0
$
434.40
$
15.0
$
434.40
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
22.0
$
654.06
$
29.0
$
862.17
$
29.0
$
862.17
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
30.0
$
1,080.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
59.0
$
2,147.01
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
108.0
$
4,429.08
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
$
$
108.0
108.0
$
$
4,429.08
4,429.08
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
$
11.0
$
276.10
$
14.0
$
351.40
$
14.0
$
351.40
101-500
$
27.03
$
11.0
$
297.33
$
14.0
$
378.42
$
14.0
$
378.42
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
13.0
$
376.48
$
15.0
$
434.40
$
15.0
$
434.40
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
22.0
$
654.06
$
29.0
$
862.17
$
29.0
$
862.17
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
30.0
$
1,080.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
59.0
$
2,147.01
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
108.0
$
4,429.08
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
$
$
108.0
108.0
$
$
4,429.08
4,429.08
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
$
4.0
$
100.40
$
6.0
$
150.60
$
6.0
$
150.60
101-500
$
27.03
$
4.0
$
108.12
$
6.0
$
162.18
$
6.0
$
162.18
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
4.0
$
115.84
$
6.0
$
173.76
$
6.0
$
173.76
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
4.0
$
118.92
$
6.0
$
178.38
$
6.0
$
178.38
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
30.0
$
1,080.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
59.0
$
2,147.01
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
108.0
$
4,429.08
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
$
$
108.0
108.0
$
$
4,429.08
4,429.08
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
$
4.0
$
100.40
$
6.0
$
150.60
$
6.0
$
150.60
101-500
$
27.03
$
4.0
$
108.12
$
6.0
$
162.18
$
6.0
$
162.18
173.76
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
4.0
$
115.84
$
6.0
$
173.76
$
6.0
$
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
4.0
$
118.92
$
6.0
$
178.38
$
6.0
$
178.38
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
30.0
$
1,080.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
59.0
$
2,147.01
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
108.0
$
4,429.08
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
$
$
108.0
108.0
$
$
4,429.08
4,429.08
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
$
4.0
$
100.40
$
6.0
$
150.60
$
6.0
$
150.60
101-500
$
27.03
$
4.0
$
108.12
$
6.0
$
162.18
$
6.0
$
162.18
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
4.0
$
115.84
$
6.0
$
173.76
$
6.0
$
173.76
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
4.0
$
118.92
$
6.0
$
178.38
$
6.0
$
178.38
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
30.0
$
1,080.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
59.0
$
2,147.01
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
108.0
$
4,429.08
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
41.01
41.01
$
$
108.0
108.0
$
$
4,429.08
4,429.08
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
$
$
117.0
117.0
$
$
4,798.17
4,798.17
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
$
4.0
$
100.40
$
6.0
$
150.60
$
6.0
$
150.60
101-500
$
27.03
$
4.0
$
108.12
$
6.0
$
162.18
$
6.0
$
162.18
501-1,000
$
28.96
$
4.0
$
115.84
$
6.0
$
173.76
$
6.0
$
173.76
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
$
4.0
$
118.92
$
6.0
$
178.38
$
6.0
$
178.38
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
$
30.0
$
1,080.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
$
36.0
$
1,296.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
$
59.0
$
2,147.01
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
$
75.0
$
2,729.25
4,798.17
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
$
108.0
$
4,429.08
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
$
117.0
$
500,001-1 Million
$
41.01
$
108.0
$
4,429.08
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
> 1 Million
$
41.01
$
108.0
$
4,429.08
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
$
117.0
$
4,798.17
Note:
(F) EPA assumes that the burden incurred by operators to assess their PWSs following a second non-acute violation is equal to the burden incurred by an assessment following an acute
violation.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
(B), (D), (F) Proposed RTCR T&C Document1.
1
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Technology and Cost Document for the Proposed Revised Total Coliform Rule. EPA 815-R-10-002.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.18 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Level 1 and Level 2 Assessments (AIP)
Level 1 Assessments
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
Non-Acute Trigger
(single trigger)
(hours)
Unit Cost
Acute Violations
(hours)
A
B
C=A*B
D
Level 2 Assessments
Level 2 Triggers
(triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
Unit Cost
(hours)
E=A*D
Unit Cost
F
G=A*F
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
78.44
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
235.31
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
(B), (D), (E) Labor hour assumptions based on best professional judgement.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.19 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Level 1 and Level 2 Assessments (TCR)
Level 1 Assessments
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Labor Cost (per
hour)
Non-Acute
Violations (single
violation) (hours)
A
B
Level 2 Assessments
Unit Cost
Acute Violations
(hours)
C=A*B
D
Unit Cost
Non-Acute Violations
(multiple violations)
(hours)
Unit Cost
E=A*D
F
G=A*F
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
78.44
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
101-500
$
39.22
1.0
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
2.0
$
78.44
501-1,000
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
1,001-4,100
$
39.22
2.0
$
78.44
4.0
$
156.87
4.0
$
156.87
4,101-33,000
$
39.22
3.0
$
117.65
6.0
$
235.31
6.0
$
235.31
33,001-96,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
313.74
96,001-500,000
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
500,001-1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
> 1 Million
$
39.22
4.0
$
156.87
8.0
$
313.74
8.0
$
313.74
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
(B), (D), (E) Labor hour assumptions based on best professional judgement.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.20 PWS Compliance Forecast for Level 1 and Level 2 Corrective Actions (AIP)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
PWS
Flushing
A
Sampler
Training
B
Replace/Repair
Maintenance of
of Distribution Maintenance of
appropriate
Adequate
System
Hydraulic
Components
Pressure
Residence Time
D
E
C
Storage
Facility
Maintenance
F
Booster
Disinfection
G
connection
Control and
Backflow
Prevention
Program
H
Addition or
Upgrade of
On-line
Monitoring
and Control
I
Development and
Addition of Implementation of
Security
an Operations
Measures
Plan
J
K
Level 1 Compliance Forecast
≤100
39%
15%
12%
9%
8%
6%
4%
1%
3%
1%
2%
101-500
39%
15%
12%
9%
8%
6%
4%
1%
3%
1%
2%
501-1,000
39%
15%
12%
9%
8%
6%
4%
1%
3%
1%
2%
1,001-4,100
39%
15%
12%
9%
8%
6%
4%
1%
3%
1%
2%
4,101-33,000
39%
15%
12%
9%
8%
6%
4%
1%
3%
1%
2%
33,001-96,000
39%
15%
12%
9%
8%
6%
4%
1%
3%
1%
2%
96,001-500,000
39%
15%
12%
9%
8%
6%
4%
1%
3%
1%
2%
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
39%
39%
15%
15%
12%
12%
9%
9%
8%
8%
6%
6%
4%
4%
1%
1%
3%
3%
1%
1%
2%
2%
Level 2 Compliance Forecast
≤100
15%
4%
18%
15%
15%
11%
8%
2%
6%
2%
4%
101-500
15%
4%
18%
15%
15%
11%
8%
2%
6%
2%
4%
501-1,000
15%
4%
18%
15%
15%
11%
8%
2%
6%
2%
4%
1,001-4,100
15%
4%
18%
15%
15%
11%
8%
2%
6%
2%
4%
4,101-33,000
15%
4%
18%
15%
15%
11%
8%
2%
6%
2%
4%
33,001-96,000
15%
4%
18%
15%
15%
11%
8%
2%
6%
2%
4%
96,001-500,000
15%
4%
18%
15%
15%
11%
8%
2%
6%
2%
4%
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
15%
15%
4%
4%
18%
18%
15%
15%
15%
15%
11%
11%
8%
8%
2%
2%
6%
6%
2%
2%
4%
4%
Source:
(A) - (K) Percent of PWSs performing corrective actions based on Level 1 and Level 2 assessments reflect EPA estimate.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.21 PWS Compliance Forecast for Level 1 and Level 2 Corrective Actions (TCR)
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
PWS
Flushing
A
Sampler
Training
B
Replace/Repair
Maintenance of
of Distribution Maintenance of
appropriate
Adequate
System
Hydraulic
Components
Pressure
Residence Time
D
E
C
Storage
Facility
Maintenance
F
Booster
Disinfection
G
connection
Control and
Backflow
Prevention
Program
H
Addition or
Upgrade of
On-line
Monitoring
and Control
I
Development and
Addition of Implementation of
Security
an Operations
Measures
Plan
J
K
Level 1 Compliance Forecast
≤100
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
101-500
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
501-1,000
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1,001-4,100
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4,101-33,000
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33,001-96,000
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
96,001-500,000
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Level 2 Compliance Forecast
≤100
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
101-500
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
501-1,000
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1,001-4,100
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4,101-33,000
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33,001-96,000
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
96,001-500,000
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Source:
(A) - (K) Percent of PWSs performing corrective actions based on Level 1 and Level 2 assessments reflect EPA estimate.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.22 Weighted R&R Burden Estimates for Corrective Actions
Level 1 Corrective Actions
Weighted Unit Burden - PWS
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Level 2 Corrective Actions
Weighted Unit Burden - State
Weighted Unit Burden - PWS
Weighted Unit Burden - State
TCR
AIP
TCR
AIP
TCR
AIP
TCR
AIP
A
B
D
E
G
H
J
K
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
101-500
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
501-1,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
1,001-4,100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
4,101-33,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
33,001-96,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
96,001-500,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
101-500
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
501-1,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
1,001-4,100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
4,101-33,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
33,001-96,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
96,001-500,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
101-500
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
501-1,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
1,001-4,100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
4,101-33,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
33,001-96,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
96,001-500,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
101-500
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
501-1,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
1,001-4,100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
4,101-33,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
33,001-96,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
96,001-500,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
101-500
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
501-1,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
1,001-4,100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
4,101-33,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
33,001-96,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
96,001-500,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
101-500
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
501-1,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
1,001-4,100
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
4,101-33,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
33,001-96,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
96,001-500,000
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
500,001-1 Million
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
> 1 Million
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
Sources:
(A) - (L) Weighted unit costs for corrective actions based on compliance forecasts (Exhibits D.1 - D.4 of the proposed RTCR EA1) and unit costs (Exhibits D.5 D.7 of the proposed RTCR EA).
1
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Economic Analysis for the Proposed Revised Total Coliform Rule (EPA 815-R-10-001).
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.23 Weighted R&R Unit Cost Estimates for Corrective Actions
Level 1 Corrective Actions
Weighted Unit Costs - State
Weighted Unit Costs - PWS
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
Level 2 Corrective Actions
Weighted Unit Costs - PWS
Weighted Unit Costs - State
TCR
AIP
TCR
AIP
TCR
AIP
TCR
AIP
A
B
D
E
G
H
J
K
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
-
$
12.55
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
12.55
$
-
$
19.61
101-500
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
$
19.61
501-1,000
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
1,001-4,100
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
4,101-33,000
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
33,001-96,000
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
96,001-500,000
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
$
12.55
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
12.55
$
-
$
19.61
101-500
13.52
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
501-1,000
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
1,001-4,100
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
4,101-33,000
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
33,001-96,000
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
96,001-500,000
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
$
12.55 $
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
12.55
$
-
$
19.61
101-500
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
501-1,000
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
1,001-4,100
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
4,101-33,000
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
33,001-96,000
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
96,001-500,000
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
$
12.55 $
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
12.55
$
-
$
19.61
101-500
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
501-1,000
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
1,001-4,100
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
4,101-33,000
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
33,001-96,000
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
96,001-500,000
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
$
12.55 $
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
12.55
$
-
$
19.61
101-500
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
501-1,000
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
1,001-4,100
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
4,101-33,000
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
33,001-96,000
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
96,001-500,000
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
500,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
$
$
-
$
$
20.51
20.51
$
$
-
$
$
19.61
19.61
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
$
12.55 $
$
≤100
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
12.55
$
-
$
19.61
101-500
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
13.52
$
501-1,000
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.48
$
-
$
19.61
1,001-4,100
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
14.87
$
-
$
19.61
4,101-33,000
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.00
$
-
$
19.61
33,001-96,000
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
18.20
$
-
$
19.61
96,001-500,000
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
500,001-1 Million
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
> 1 Million
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
$
-
$
20.51
$
-
$
19.61
Sources:
(A) - (L) Weighted unit costs for corrective actions based on compliance forecasts (Exhibits D.1 - D.4 of the proposed RTCR EA1) and unit costs (Exhibits D.5 - D.7
of the proposed RTCR EA).
1
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Economic Analysis for the Proposed Revised Total Coliform Rule (EPA 815-R-10-001).
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.24 PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Public Notification
Tier 1 (acute)
Average Number of
Service
Labor Cost (per Connections per
hour)
System
PWS Size
(Population
Served)
A
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
101-500
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
B
Preparation
(labor) (hours/
violation)
C
Distribution
(labor)
(hours/
violation)
D
Tier 2 (non-acute)
(O&M Cost/
notice)
($/service
connection)
F
Unit Burden
E
Unit Cost
(Labor)
G=A*E
Unit Cost
(O&M)
H=B*F
Preparation
(labor) (hours/
violation)
I
Distribution
(labor) (hours/
violation)
J
Distribution
(O&M Cost/notice)
($/service
connection)
L
Unit Burden
K
Unit Cost
(Labor)
M=A*K
Unit Cost (O&M)
N=B*l
440
387
303
850
4,288
17,273
56,465
205,609
448,564.1
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
9.2
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.5
21.2
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
514.55
554.12
593.68
609.47
763.66
800.58
902.22
902.22
902.22
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
22.00
19.33
-
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
9.0
9.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
12.5
12.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
0.26
0.26
0.25
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
313.75
337.88
970.16
995.96
1,206.00
1,219.07
1,373.84
1,373.84
1,373.84
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
22.00
19.33
78.89
221.04
1,053.65
3,972.81
12,986.84
47,290.14
103,169.73
41
99
315
756
3,495
16,366
50,564
209,220
473,641
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
9.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.5
21.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
514.55
554.12
593.68
609.47
757.48
800.58
902.22
902.22
902.22
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2.07
4.93
-
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
9.0
9.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
30.0
12.5
12.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
33.5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
0.26
0.26
0.25
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.23
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
313.75
337.88
970.16
995.96
1,206.00
1,219.07
1,373.84
1,373.84
1,373.84
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2.07
4.93
81.91
196.65
870.93
3,764.10
11,629.67
48,120.66
108,937.51
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
128
101-500
$
27.03
21
501-1,000
$
28.96
46
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
47
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
176
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
94
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
2,181
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.7
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.7
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
514.55
554.12
593.68
609.47
745.36
800.58
902.22
902.22
902.22
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6.39
1.04
-
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
313.75
337.88
362.00
371.63
450.00
454.88
512.63
512.63
512.63
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6.39
1.04
2.29
2.35
8.08
1.87
43.62
-
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
4
101-500
$
27.03
8
501-1,000
$
28.96
11
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
42
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
130
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
75
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.7
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.7
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
514.55
554.12
593.68
609.47
744.94
800.58
902.22
902.22
902.22
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.21
0.41
-
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
313.75
337.88
362.00
371.63
450.00
454.88
512.63
512.63
512.63
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.21
0.41
0.56
2.09
6.02
1.50
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - SW
≤100
$
25.10
9
101-500
$
27.03
30
501-1,000
$
28.96
49
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
58
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
57
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
2
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.8
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.8
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
514.55
554.12
593.68
609.47
747.00
800.58
902.22
902.22
902.22
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.44
1.51
-
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
313.75
337.88
362.00
371.63
450.00
454.88
512.63
512.63
512.63
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.44
1.51
2.45
2.88
2.55
0.04
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
5
101-500
$
27.03
15
501-1,000
$
28.96
30
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
43
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
39
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
14
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
9
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
1
> 1 Million
$
41.01
-
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.5
8.7
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.5
20.7
22.0
22.0
22.0
22.0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
514.55
554.12
593.68
609.47
746.87
800.58
902.22
902.22
902.22
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.27
0.76
-
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
313.75
337.88
362.00
371.63
450.00
454.88
512.63
512.63
512.63
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.27
0.76
1.51
2.14
1.77
0.27
0.18
0.02
-
Community Water Systems (CWSs) - GW
≤100
$
25.10
101-500
$
27.03
501-1,000
$
28.96
1,001-4,100
$
29.73
4,101-33,000
$
36.00
33,001-96,000
$
36.39
96,001-500,000
$
41.01
500,001-1 Million $
41.01
> 1 Million
$
41.01
Notes:
(B) Service connections per system is consistent with SDWIS 2007 4th Quarter Freeze data. Data for certain size categories (e.g., <500, 501-1,000) may seem
counterintuitive. EPA is investigating the SDWIS database for any data discrepancies.
(F), (J) used to derived TCR PN costs; (F) used to derive AIP PN costs.
Sources:
(A) Labor rates for PWSs from Exhibit A.1.
(B) SDWIS 2007 4th Quarter Freeze.
(C), (D), (G), (H) Labor hour assumptions based on best professional judgement as carried forward from the Draft Information Collection Request for the Public
Water System Supervision Program 1
(E), (I) Distribution cost assumptions based on best professional judgement as carried forward from the original PN ICR.
1
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Draft Information Collection Request for the Public Water System Supervision Program. OMB Control Number: 2040-0090. EPA Tracking Number: 0270.43.
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.25 State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Public Notification
Labor Cost
(per hour)
A
$
Tier 1 Consultation Tier 2 Consultation
(labor)
(labor)
(hours/violation)
(hours/violation)
B
39.22
C
3.00
1.10
Receive/Review PN
Certification
(labor)
(hours/violation)
File Reports
(labor)
(hours/violation)
Tier 1
Unit Burden
Tier 2
Unit Burden
D
E
F=B+D+E
G=C+D+E
0.20
0.10
3.30
1.40
Tier 1
Unit Cost
Tier 2
Unit Cost
H=A*(B+D+E)
$
129.42
I=A*(C+D+E)
$
54.91
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit A.1.
(B), (C), (D), (E) Labor hour assumptions based on best professional judgement as carried forward from the Draft Information Collection Request for the Public Water System Supervision
Program 1
1
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Draft Information Collection Request for the Public Water System Supervision Program. OMB Control Number: 2040-0090. EPA Tracking
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.26 Respondents, Year by Year by Activity (AIP)
PWSs
Respondents
Start-Up Activities
Year 1
Implementation
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
51,612
51,612
51,612
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77,419
77,419
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
1,511
1,478
1,451
1,422
1,442
1,299
1,260
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
5,052
4,967
4,885
4,753
4,778
4,851
4,817
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
-
-
-
4,888
4,802
4,655
4,766
4,646
4,822
4,611
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
630
571
583
590
561
535
569
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
2,576
2,150
1,960
1,757
1,659
1,844
1,762
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
454
477
449
486
480
497
454
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
337
240
251
243
218
225
233
Public Notification
-
-
-
630
571
583
590
561
535
569
51,612
129,031
129,031
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
PWSs with one/more Respondent Activities
States
Respondents
Start-Up Activities
Year 1
Implementation
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
57
57
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
57
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Public Notification
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Year 1
51,612
57
Year 2
129,031
57
Year 3
129,031
57
Year 4
154,837
57
Year 5
154,837
57
Year 6
154,837
57
Year 7
154,837
57
Year 8
154,837
57
Year 9
154,837
57
Year 10
154,837
57
51,669
129,088
129,088
154,894
154,894
154,894
154,894
154,894
154,894
154,894
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.27 Respondents, Year by Year by Activity (TCR)
PWSs
Respondents
Start-Up Activities
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Implementation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revise Sampling Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
4,708
4,671
4,654
4,636
4,660
4,711
4,728
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
5,196
5,168
5,171
5,153
5,144
5,207
5,184
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Violation (single violation)
-
-
-
4,921
4,917
4,898
4,953
4,866
4,987
4,945
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
667
720
739
685
742
751
688
Level 2 Assessments - Non-Acute Violations (multiple
violations)
-
-
-
2,610
2,524
2,523
2,469
2,571
2,575
2,720
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Public Notification
-
-
-
8,197
8,161
8,159
8,107
8,179
8,312
8,354
-
-
-
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
154,837
Annual Activities
PWSs with one/more Respondent Activities
States
Respondents
Start-Up Activities
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Implementation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revise Sampling Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Violation (single violation)
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Level 2 Assessments - Non-Acute Violations (multiple
violations)
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Public Notification
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Annual Activities
Sum for PWSs and States
Year 1
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
-
Year 2
-
Year 3
-
Year 4
154,837
57
Year 5
154,837
57
Year 6
154,837
57
Year 7
154,837
57
Year 8
154,837
57
Year 9
154,837
57
Year 10
154,837
57
-
-
-
154,894
154,894
154,894
154,894
154,894
154,894
154,894
June 2010
Exhibit A.28 AIP Net Change Respondents, Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Respondents
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
51,612
51,612
51,612
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77,419
77,419
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
(3,197)
(3,193)
(3,203)
(3,215)
(3,219)
(3,412)
(3,468)
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
(143)
(200)
(286)
(400)
(366)
(356)
(367)
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
-
-
-
(32)
(115)
(243)
(187)
(219)
(165)
(334)
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
(37)
(148)
(155)
(95)
(180)
(216)
(119)
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
(34)
(375)
(563)
(712)
(912)
(731)
(958)
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
454
477
449
486
480
497
454
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
337
240
251
243
218
225
233
Public Notification
-
-
-
51,612
129,031
129,031
Year 2
Year 3
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
PWSs with one/more Respondent Activities
States
Respondents
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
Year 1
-
(7,567)
-
(7,590)
-
Year 4
-
(7,576)
-
Year 5
-
(7,516)
-
Year 6
-
(7,617)
-
Year 7
-
(7,777)
-
Year 8
-
(7,784)
-
Year 9
-
Year 10
57
57
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
57
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Public Notification
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.29 Responses, Year by Year by Activity (AIP)
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
51,612
51,612
51,612
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77,419
77,419
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
3,553,465
3,553,488
3,553,505
3,553,520
3,553,516
3,599,332
3,599,332
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
36,209
35,391
34,725
33,987
34,467
31,443
30,483
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
121,084
118,946
116,896
113,621
114,240
117,425
116,552
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
-
-
-
4,888
4,802
4,655
4,766
4,646
4,822
4,611
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
630
571
583
590
561
535
569
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
2,576
2,150
1,960
1,757
1,659
1,844
1,762
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
454
477
449
486
480
497
454
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
337
240
251
243
218
225
233
Public Notification
-
-
-
630
571
583
590
561
535
569
51,612
129,031
129,031
3,720,273
3,716,636
3,713,608
3,709,559
3,710,350
3,756,656
3,754,566
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
57
57
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77,419
77,419
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger
-
-
-
4,888
4,802
4,655
4,766
4,646
4,822
4,611
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
630
571
583
590
561
535
569
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
2,576
2,150
1,960
1,757
1,659
1,844
1,762
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
454
477
449
486
480
497
454
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
337
240
251
243
218
225
233
Public Notification
-
-
-
630
571
583
590
561
535
569
57
77,476
77,476
9,515
8,811
8,482
8,432
8,126
8,456
8,199
Year 1
51,612
57
Year 2
129,031
77,476
Year 3
129,031
77,476
Year 4
3,720,273
9,515
Year 5
3,716,636
8,811
Year 6
3,713,608
8,482
Year 7
3,709,559
8,432
Year 8
3,710,350
8,126
Year 9
3,756,656
8,456
Year 10
3,754,566
8,199
51,669
206,506
206,506
3,729,788
3,725,447
3,722,089
3,717,991
3,718,476
3,765,113
3,762,765
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.30 Responses, Year by Year by Activity (TCR)
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revise Sampling Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
3,492,312
3,492,532
3,492,473
3,492,412
3,492,401
3,492,422
3,492,431
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
113,450
112,516
112,092
111,632
112,223
113,531
113,933
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
125,198
124,469
124,543
124,071
123,865
125,483
124,937
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Violation (single violation)
-
-
-
4,921
4,917
4,898
4,953
4,866
4,987
4,945
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
667
720
739
685
742
751
688
Level 2 Assessments - Non-Acute Violations (multiple violations)
-
-
-
2,610
2,524
2,523
2,469
2,571
2,575
2,720
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Public Notification
-
-
-
8,197
8,161
8,159
8,107
8,179
8,312
8,354
-
-
-
3,747,355
3,745,839
3,745,426
3,744,328
3,744,846
3,748,060
3,748,008
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revise Sampling Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Violation (single violation)
-
-
-
4,921
4,917
4,898
4,953
4,866
4,987
4,945
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
667
720
739
685
742
751
688
Level 2 Assessments - Non-Acute Violations (multiple violations)
-
-
-
2,610
2,524
2,523
2,469
2,571
2,575
2,720
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Public Notification
-
-
-
8,197
8,161
8,159
8,107
8,179
8,312
8,354
-
-
-
16,395
16,322
16,318
16,213
16,357
16,625
16,707
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
Sum for PWSs and States
Year 1
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
-
Year 2
-
Year 3
-
Year 4
3,747,355
16,395
Year 5
3,745,839
16,322
Year 6
3,745,426
16,318
Year 7
3,744,328
16,213
Year 8
3,744,846
16,357
Year 9
3,748,060
16,625
Year 10
3,748,008
16,707
-
-
-
3,763,750
3,762,160
3,761,744
3,760,542
3,761,203
3,764,685
3,764,715
June 2010
Exhibit A.31 AIP Net Change Responses, Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
51,612
51,612
51,612
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77,419
77,419
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
61,153
60,956
61,032
61,108
61,115
106,911
106,901
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
(77,241)
(77,124)
(77,367)
(77,646)
(77,756)
(82,088)
(83,450)
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
(4,114)
(5,523)
(7,647)
(10,450)
(9,625)
(8,058)
(8,385)
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
-
-
-
(32)
(115)
(243)
(187)
(219)
(165)
(334)
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
(37)
(148)
(155)
(95)
(180)
(216)
(119)
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
(34)
(375)
(563)
(712)
(912)
(731)
(958)
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
454
477
449
486
480
497
454
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
337
240
251
243
218
225
233
Public Notification
-
-
-
(7,567)
(7,590)
(7,576)
(7,516)
(7,617)
(7,777)
(7,784)
51,612
129,031
129,031
(27,082)
(29,202)
(31,818)
(34,769)
(34,496)
8,596
6,558
Year 2
Year 3
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
States
Year 1
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
57
57
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
77,419
77,419
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger
-
-
-
(32)
(115)
(243)
(187)
(219)
(165)
(334)
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
(37)
(148)
(155)
(95)
(180)
(216)
(119)
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
(34)
(375)
(563)
(712)
(912)
(731)
(958)
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
454
477
449
486
480
497
454
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
337
240
251
243
218
225
233
Public Notification
-
-
-
(7,567)
(7,590)
(7,576)
(7,516)
(7,617)
(7,777)
(7,784)
57
77,476
77,476
(6,880)
(7,510)
(7,836)
(7,781)
(8,231)
(8,168)
(8,508)
Year 1
51,612
57
Year 2
129,031
77,476
Year 3
129,031
77,476
Year 4
(27,082)
(6,880)
Year 5
(29,202)
(7,510)
Year 6
(31,818)
(7,836)
Year 7
(34,769)
(7,781)
Year 8
(34,496)
(8,231)
Year 9
8,596
(8,168)
Year 10
6,558
(8,508)
51,669
206,506
206,506
(33,961)
(36,713)
(39,654)
(42,550)
(42,727)
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
428
(1,950)
June 2010
Exhibit A.32 Burden, Year by Year by Activity (AIP)
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
619,348
619,348
619,348
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192,750
192,750
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
3,186,637
3,186,649
3,186,658
3,186,665
3,186,663
3,209,398
3,209,398
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
18,383
17,966
17,621
17,255
17,493
15,972
15,490
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
89,727
88,493
87,178
84,513
85,003
86,230
85,775
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
-
-
-
66,340
65,556
64,135
64,517
63,170
64,690
63,225
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
16,302
15,016
15,251
15,302
14,625
14,058
14,666
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
34,953
28,688
26,285
23,198
21,959
23,223
22,428
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
227
239
225
243
240
248
227
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
168
120
126
121
109
112
116
Public Notification
-
-
-
12,939
11,732
11,977
12,124
11,528
10,988
11,695
619,348
812,098
812,098
3,425,678
3,414,459
3,409,454
3,403,938
3,400,791
3,424,918
3,423,021
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
States
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
27,428
27,428
27,428
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96,375
96,375
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger
-
-
-
6,223
6,127
5,972
6,068
5,936
6,112
5,903
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
1,538
1,412
1,427
1,432
1,367
1,310
1,371
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
5,869
4,879
4,408
3,946
3,719
4,058
3,879
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
227
239
225
243
240
248
227
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
168
120
126
121
109
112
116
Public Notification
-
-
-
2,079
1,885
1,924
1,948
1,852
1,765
1,879
27,428
123,803
123,803
16,105
14,662
14,081
13,759
13,224
13,606
13,375
Year 1
619,348
27,428
Year 2
812,098
123,803
Year 3
812,098
123,803
Year 4
3,425,678
16,105
Year 5
3,414,459
14,662
Year 6
3,409,454
14,081
Year 7
3,403,938
13,759
Year 8
3,400,791
13,224
Year 9
3,424,918
13,606
Year 10
3,423,021
13,375
646,776
935,901
935,901
3,441,783
3,429,120
3,423,535
3,417,697
3,414,015
3,438,524
3,436,396
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.33 Burden, Year by Year by Activity (TCR)
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revise Sampling Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
3,153,905
3,154,023
3,153,994
3,153,952
3,153,962
3,153,950
3,153,976
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
61,522
61,034
60,809
60,640
60,884
61,587
61,721
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
91,634
91,003
91,372
90,909
90,612
91,654
91,192
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Violation (single violation)
-
-
-
43,639
43,495
43,225
43,545
43,394
43,759
43,735
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
6,927
7,110
7,321
6,927
7,412
7,479
6,923
Level 2 Assessments - Non-Acute Violations (multiple
violations)
-
-
-
22,985
22,228
22,299
21,865
22,601
22,557
23,624
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Public Notification
-
-
-
126,696
126,362
126,371
125,294
126,722
128,526
128,914
-
-
-
3,507,307
3,505,255
3,505,391
3,503,132
3,505,587
3,509,512
3,510,087
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Revise Sampling Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Violation (single violation)
-
-
-
6,294
6,278
6,251
6,314
6,227
6,347
6,318
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
1,614
1,726
1,762
1,655
1,770
1,802
1,655
Level 2 Assessments - Non-Acute Violations (multiple
violations)
-
-
-
5,921
5,740
5,737
5,634
5,831
5,843
6,147
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Public Notification
-
-
-
12,744
12,792
12,826
12,650
12,859
13,065
13,002
-
-
-
26,573
26,536
26,576
26,253
26,687
27,057
27,122
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
Sum for PWSs and States
Year 1
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
-
Year 2
-
Year 3
-
Year 4
3,507,307
26,573
Year 5
3,505,255
26,536
Year 6
3,505,391
26,576
Year 7
3,503,132
26,253
Year 8
3,505,587
26,687
Year 9
3,509,512
27,057
Year 10
3,510,087
27,122
-
-
-
3,533,881
3,531,791
3,531,967
3,529,385
3,532,274
3,536,569
3,537,209
June 2010
Exhibit A.34 AIP Net Change Burden, Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
619,348
619,348
619,348
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192,750
192,750
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
32,732
32,626
32,663
32,714
32,702
55,448
55,422
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
(43,139)
(43,068)
(43,189)
(43,385)
(43,391)
(45,615)
(46,231)
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
(1,907)
(2,510)
(4,194)
(6,397)
(5,609)
(5,424)
(5,418)
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
-
-
-
22,702
22,061
20,910
20,973
19,776
20,931
19,489
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
9,375
7,906
7,930
8,375
7,213
6,578
7,742
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
11,968
6,460
3,986
1,333
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
227
239
225
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
168
120
126
Public Notification
-
-
-
(113,757)
(114,630)
(114,394)
(113,170)
(115,194)
(117,537)
(117,219)
619,348
812,098
812,098
(81,630)
(90,796)
(95,937)
(99,194)
(104,796)
(84,593)
(87,066)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
(642)
665
(1,196)
243
240
248
227
121
109
112
116
States
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
27,428
27,428
27,428
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96,375
96,375
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Administration
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Additional Routine Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Repeat Monitoring
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Site Visits
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger
-
-
-
(72)
(151)
(279)
(245)
(290)
(235)
(415)
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
-
-
-
(76)
(314)
(335)
(223)
(403)
(492)
(285)
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
-
-
-
(52)
(861)
(1,329)
(1,688)
(2,112)
(1,785)
(2,268)
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
-
-
-
227
239
225
243
240
248
227
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
-
-
-
168
120
126
121
109
112
116
Public Notification
-
-
-
(10,664)
(10,907)
(10,901)
(10,702)
(11,007)
(11,299)
(11,123)
27,428
123,803
123,803
(10,468)
(11,874)
(12,495)
(12,494)
(13,464)
(13,451)
(13,747)
Year 1
619,348
27,428
Year 2
812,098
123,803
Year 3
812,098
123,803
Year 4
(81,630)
(10,468)
Year 5
(90,796)
(11,874)
Year 6
(95,937)
(12,495)
Year 7
(99,194)
(12,494)
Year 8
(104,796)
(13,464)
Year 9
(84,593)
(13,451)
Year 10
(87,066)
(13,747)
646,776
935,901
935,901
(92,098)
(102,670)
(108,432)
(111,688)
(118,260)
(98,044)
(100,813)
Revise Sampling Plan
Annual Activities
Yearly Total
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.35 Costs, Year by Year by Activity (AIP)
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
$ 16,583,083
$
16,583,083
$
16,583,083
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Revise Sampling Plan
$
-
$
5,382,834
$
5,382,834
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$ 114,740,703
$ 86,127,063
$ 114,741,002
$ 86,127,921
$ 114,741,211
$ 86,128,567
$ 114,741,424
$ 86,129,159
$ 114,741,362
$ 86,128,996
$ 115,314,124
$ 87,869,696
$ 115,314,134
$ 87,869,700
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
472,804
1,002,609
$
$
462,233
980,204
$
$
453,486
962,124
$
$
443,882
941,513
$
$
449,595
954,735
$
$
411,047
871,303
$
$
398,865
845,220
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
2,974,862
2,911,479
$
$
2,940,039
2,853,698
$
$
2,900,282
2,800,622
$
$
2,807,430
2,725,902
$
$
2,823,937
2,739,708
$
$
2,846,541
2,832,274
$
$
2,834,986
2,808,864
Annual Site Visits
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,958,032
$
1,937,902
$
1,901,058
$
1,908,547
$
1,872,785
$
1,911,304
$
1,875,193
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
456,822
$
423,116
$
428,998
$
428,818
$
410,512
$
396,425
$
410,564
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
935,043
$
765,192
$
699,973
$
617,760
$
584,200
$
613,883
$
593,125
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
6,118
$
6,424
$
6,053
$
6,526
$
6,445
$
6,643
$
6,125
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
4,413
$
3,185
$
3,302
$
3,183
$
2,859
$
2,944
$
3,040
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
344,640
755
$
$
313,175
672
$
$
319,301
673
$
$
321,921
609
$
$
306,014
617
$
$
292,717
661
$
$
309,775
581
Yearly Total $ 16,583,083
$
21,965,917
$
21,965,917
Annual Activities
Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Additional Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Repeat Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Public Notification (Labor + O&M)
$ 211,589,947
$ 211,240,916
$ 211,025,677
$ 210,754,145
$ 210,715,133
$ 213,076,185
$ 212,959,816
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
$
1,075,657
$
1,075,657
$
1,075,657
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Revise Sampling Plan
$
-
$
3,779,647
$
3,779,647
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Annual Site Visits
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
244,039
$
240,274
$
234,195
$
237,993
$
232,807
$
239,714
$
231,518
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
60,333
$
55,387
$
55,969
$
56,145
$
53,625
$
51,357
$
53,750
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
230,188
$
191,341
$
172,874
$
154,773
$
145,853
$
159,143
$
152,129
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
8,906
$
9,360
$
8,805
$
9,524
$
9,411
$
9,740
$
8,906
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
6,605
$
4,712
$
4,930
$
4,759
$
4,276
$
4,405
$
4,569
Public Notification
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
81,545
$
73,923
$
75,469
$
76,396
$
72,635
$
69,228
$
73,689
Yearly Total $
1,075,657
$
4,855,303
$
4,855,303
$
631,615
$
574,998
$
552,242
$
539,591
$
518,608
$
533,588
$
524,561
Year 1
$ 16,583,083
$ 1,075,657
$
$
Year 2
21,965,917
4,855,303
$
$
Year 3
21,965,917
4,855,303
Year 4
$ 211,589,947
$
631,615
Year 5
$ 211,240,916
$
574,998
Year 6
$ 211,025,677
$
552,242
Year 7
$ 210,754,145
$
539,591
Year 8
$ 210,715,133
$
518,608
Year 9
$ 213,076,185
$
533,588
Year 10
$ 212,959,816
$
524,561
Yearly Total $ 17,658,740
$
26,821,220
$
26,821,220
$ 212,221,562
$ 211,815,913
$ 211,577,919
$ 211,293,736
$ 211,233,741
$ 213,609,773
$ 213,484,376
Annual Activities
Annual Adminstration
Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Additional Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Repeat Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
Exhibit A.36 Costs, Year by Year by Activity (TCR)
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Revise Sampling Plan
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$ 113,878,868
$ 83,857,446
$ 113,882,117
$ 83,865,318
$ 113,881,288
$ 83,863,433
$ 113,880,077
$ 83,860,971
$ 113,880,529
$ 83,860,332
$ 113,879,965
$ 83,861,680
$ 113,880,917
$ 83,861,523
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
1,636,973
2,876,658
$
$
1,623,937
2,852,959
$
$
1,618,247
2,842,225
$
$
1,614,660
2,830,568
$
$
1,620,624
2,845,539
$
$
1,638,225
2,878,687
$
$
1,641,205
2,888,887
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
3,019,569
2,938,162
$
$
2,996,914
2,922,861
$
$
3,014,249
2,919,650
$
$
2,996,826
2,911,882
$
$
2,984,797
2,907,984
$
$
3,016,595
2,948,262
$
$
3,000,672
2,935,477
Annual Site Visits
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Violation (single violation)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,310,676
$
1,305,640
$
1,298,575
$
1,307,003
$
1,303,572
$
1,312,764
$
1,313,184
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
198,033
$
202,394
$
207,912
$
197,924
$
210,383
$
212,378
$
197,442
Level 2 Assessments - Non-Acute Violations (multiple violations)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
613,818
$
593,847
$
595,562
$
583,827
$
603,118
$
602,149
$
629,325
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
3,485,616
837,477
$
$
3,473,171
835,216
$
$
3,473,257
834,213
$
$
3,445,137
834,015
$
$
3,483,391
835,083
$
$
3,528,693
835,514
$
$
3,540,146
838,114
Yearly Total $
-
$
-
$
-
$ 214,653,297
$ 214,554,375
$ 214,548,613
$ 214,462,891
$ 214,535,351
$ 214,714,914
$ 214,726,891
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Annual Activities
Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Additional Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Repeat Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Public Notification (Labor + O&M)
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Revise Sampling Plan
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Annual Site Visits
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Violation (single violation)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
246,851
$
246,199
$
245,148
$
247,605
$
244,192
$
248,931
$
247,786
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
63,305
$
67,685
$
69,106
$
64,900
$
69,435
$
70,671
$
64,925
Level 2 Assessments - Non-Acute Violations (multiple violations)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
232,216
$
225,110
$
225,013
$
220,961
$
228,700
$
229,150
$
241,057
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Public Notification
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
499,780
$
501,694
$
502,995
$
496,124
$
504,300
$
512,370
$
509,921
Yearly Total $
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,042,153
$
1,040,687
$
1,042,263
$
1,029,589
$
1,046,626
$
1,061,122
$
1,063,689
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Year 4
$ 214,653,297
$
1,042,153
Year 5
$ 214,554,375
$
1,040,687
Year 6
$ 214,548,613
$
1,042,263
Year 7
$ 214,462,891
$
1,029,589
Year 8
$ 214,535,351
$
1,046,626
Year 9
$ 214,714,914
$
1,061,122
Year 10
$ 214,726,891
$
1,063,689
Yearly Total $
-
$
-
$
-
$ 215,695,450
$ 215,595,062
$ 215,590,876
$ 215,492,480
$ 215,581,977
$ 215,776,036
$ 215,790,580
Annual Activities
Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Additional Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Repeat Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Sum for PWSs and States
Year 1
PWSs
States and Territories
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
Year 2
Year 3
June 2010
Exhibit A.37 Net Change AIP Costs, Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Implementation
$ 16,583,083
$ 16,583,083
$ 16,583,083
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Revise Sampling Plan
$
-
$ 5,382,834
$ 5,382,834
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
861,835
$ 2,269,617
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$ (1,164,170) $ (1,161,704) $ (1,164,761) $ (1,170,779) $ (1,171,029) $ (1,227,179) $ (1,242,340)
$ (1,874,049) $ (1,872,755) $ (1,880,101) $ (1,889,055) $ (1,890,804) $ (2,007,383) $ (2,043,667)
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
Annual Site Visits
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
647,356
$
632,262
$
602,483
$
601,545
$
569,213
$
598,540
$
562,008
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
258,789
$
220,722
$
221,086
$
230,894
$
200,129
$
184,047
$
213,122
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
321,225
$
171,344
$
104,411
$
33,933
$
(18,918) $
11,734
$
(36,200)
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
6,118
$
6,424
$
6,053
$
6,526
$
6,445
$
6,643
$
6,125
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
4,413
$
3,185
$
3,302
$
3,183
$
2,859
$
2,944
$
3,040
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$ (3,140,976) $ (3,159,996) $ (3,153,957) $ (3,123,216) $ (3,177,377) $ (3,235,976) $ (3,230,371)
$ (836,721) $ (834,544) $ (833,540) $ (833,406) $ (834,465) $ (834,853) $ (837,533)
$ 21,965,917
$ 21,965,917
$ (2,717,955) $ (2,999,613) $ (3,202,962) $ (3,386,215) $ (3,513,586) $ (1,345,350) $ (1,456,719)
Year 2
Year 3
Start-Up Activities
Annual Activities
Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
$
858,885
$ 2,262,602
$
859,923
$ 2,265,134
$
861,346
$ 2,268,188
$
860,833
$ 2,268,664
$ 1,434,159
$ 4,008,015
$ 1,433,218
$ 4,008,177
Additional Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Repeat Monitoring Samples (Labor + O&M)
(44,707) $
(26,683) $
(56,875) $
(69,163) $
(113,967) $
(119,029) $
(189,396) $
(185,979) $
(160,860) $
(168,275) $
(170,054) $
(115,988) $
(165,686)
(126,613)
Public Notification (Labor + O&M)
Yearly Total $ 16,583,083
States
Year 1
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Implementation
$
1,075,657
$ 1,075,657
$ 1,075,657
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Revise Sampling Plan
$
-
$ 3,779,647
$ 3,779,647
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Labor $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
$
-
Annual Site Visits
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Level 1 Assessments - Non-Acute Trigger (single trigger)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
(2,812) $
(5,925) $
(10,953) $
(9,612) $
(11,384) $
(9,217) $
(16,268)
Level 2 Assessments - Acute Violations
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
(2,972) $
(12,298) $
(13,137) $
(8,754) $
(15,809) $
(19,314) $
(11,175)
Level 2 Assessments - Level 2 Triggers (triggered by
multiple Level 1s)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
(2,029) $
(33,768) $
(52,140) $
(66,187) $
(82,847) $
(70,007) $
(88,928)
Corrective Actions Based on Level 1 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
8,906
$
9,360
$
8,805
$
9,524
$
9,411
$
9,740
$
8,906
Corrective Actions Based on Level 2 Assessments
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
6,605
$
4,712
$
4,930
$
4,759
$
4,276
$
4,405
$
4,569
Public Notification
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
(418,235) $
(427,770) $
(427,526) $
(419,728) $
(431,665) $
(443,141) $
(436,232)
Yearly Total $
1,075,657
$ 4,855,303
$ 4,855,303
$
(410,538) $
(465,689) $
(490,021) $
(489,999) $
(528,019) $
(527,534) $
(539,128)
Year 1
$ 16,583,083
$ 1,075,657
Year 2
$ 21,965,917
$ 4,855,303
Year 3
$ 21,965,917
$ 4,855,303
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
$ (2,717,955) $ (2,999,613) $ (3,202,962) $ (3,386,215) $ (3,513,586) $ (1,345,350) $ (1,456,719)
$ (410,538) $ (465,689) $ (490,021) $ (489,999) $ (528,019) $ (527,534) $ (539,128)
Yearly Total $ 17,658,740
$ 26,821,220
$ 26,821,220
$ (3,128,493) $ (3,465,302) $ (3,692,983) $ (3,876,214) $ (4,041,604) $ (1,872,884) $ (1,995,848)
Annual Activities
Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Additional Routine Monitoring (Labor + O&M)
Repeat Monitoring Samples (Labor + O&M)
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
ICR for the Proposed RTCR
June 2010
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Title | Microsoft Word - RTCR_ICR_Text_5-21-10.doc |
| Author | mnataraja |
| File Modified | 2010-06-01 |
| File Created | 2010-06-01 |