Supporting Statement EIB 10-02 2-22-11

Supporting Statement EIB 10-02 2-22-11.doc

Application for Short-Term Express Credit Insurance Policy

OMB: 3048-0031

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions

OMB Form 3048-xxxx

Application for Express Insurance (EIB 10-02)



General Instructions

A Supporting Statement, including the text of the notice to the public required by 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(i)(iv) and its actual or estimated date of publication in the Federal Register, must accompany each request for approval of a collection of information. The Supporting Statement must be prepared in the format described below, and must contain information specified in Section A below. If an item is not applicable, provide a brief explanation. OMB reserves the right to require the submission of additional information with respect to any request for approval.


Specific Instructions


  1. Justification


  1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

    The Export Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) pursuant to the Export Import Bank Act of 1945, as amended (12 USC 635, et seq), facilitates the financing of exports of U.S. goods and services. By neutralizing the effect of export credit insurance and guarantees offered by foreign governments and by absorbing credit risks that the private sector will not accept, Ex-Im Bank enables U.S. exporters to compete fairly in foreign markets on the basis of price and produce. This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to12 USC Sec. 635 (a) (1), to determine eligibility of the applicant for Ex-Im Bank assistance.

  2. Indicate how, by whom and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

    This form is used by an exporter (or broker acting on its behalf) in order to obtain approval for coverage of the repayment risk of export sales. The information received provides Ex-Im Bank staff with the information necessary to make a determination of the eligibility of the applicant and the creditworthiness of one of the applicant’s foreign buyers for Ex-Im Bank assistance under its programs.

  3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submissions of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.

    Ex-Im Bank expects that the majority of these forms will be received electronically, via the existing on-line application and processing system used for insurance. Ex-Im Bank processing is fully electronic and concludes with the issuance of a document sent electronically to the applicant.

    Technology accelerates the entire process but does not necessarily reduce the amount or substance of credit information required from the applicant. Accessibility to policy documents is considerably improved for exporters through technology.

  4. Describe effort to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

    All applications are independent of each other; therefore there is no duplication since each application corresponds to a unique insurance product. The application allows the applicant to indicate when information is already on file with Ex-Im Bank.

  5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities describe any methods used to minimize burden.

    Pursuant to the response in #3 above, the burden to small businesses is reduced largely through unnecessary, back-and-forth transmission of paper or hard copy documents whose timeliness through the mail system is inconsistent, untimely, and could be lost in transit. Additionally, Ex-Im Bank’s regional office staff will be assisting the exporters with the application process and will sometimes enter the application for the customer.

  6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

    Absent the information required in the application form, Ex-Im Bank would be unable to make the necessary judgments to determine eligibility of the applicant. Without those judgments, Ex-IM Bank would not be able to provide the coverage needed by our customers.

  7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner”
    *requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;
    *requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;
    *requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;
    *in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid or reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;
    *requiring the use of statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;
    *that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or
    *requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.

    This collection is consistent with guidelines in 5 CRF 1320.6.

  8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments.

    Based upon comments received Ex-Im Bank has changed the name of this form to Application for Express Insurance. This change will minimize confusion between this new Ex-Im Bank insurance program and an existing Small Business Administration Export Express guarantee program.

  9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.

    Not applicable.

  10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

    Ex-Im Bank and its officers and employees are subject to the Trade Secrets Ac t, 19 USC Sec 1905, which requires Ex-Im Bank to protect confidential business and commercial information from disclosure, as well as, 12 CRF 404.1, which provided that, except as required by law, Ex-Im Bank will not disclose information provided in confidence without the submitter’s consent.

  11. Provide additional justification for any question of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered provides. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considered the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

    The Export Import Bank Charter, Sec. 2(b)(1)(E)(iii)(II) requires us to “put particular emphasis on conducting outreach and increasing loans to socially and economically disadvantaged small business concerns, small business concerns owned by women, and small business concerns employing fewer than 100 employees.”

    In the past we collected this information from Dun & Bradstreet but in 2007 the Bank’s Small Business Committee determined that the Bank was under identifying woman-owned and minority-owned businesses. Therefore, it was decided that the question “Is the majority ownership of your business represented by: women or a minority?”, would be added to the application forms.

Using the data provided on the forms and the Dun & Bradstreet report we identify authorizations that we know directly benefit women or minority owned businesses. This data is reported to Congress monthly and is also contained in our Annual Report.

  1. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should include:

    The number of respondents; 500
    The frequency of response;
    Once per year
    Annual hour burden; and
    125 hours per year

    An explanation of how the burden was estimated.
    From time to time staff completes a “sample” application form for use in testing, training, etc. The time is takes for staff to fill out the application form is 5 minutes. If the applicant has their credit information at hand, it should take the respondent 5 minutes as well. For burden calculation purposes, we assumed that it would take on average 15 minutes for respondents to complete the application. We expect to receive, on average 500 per year. Thus, the annual burden rate can be calculated as 500 * 0.25) – 125.00 hours.


  2. Provide an estimate for the total annual cost burden to respondents or records keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in items 12 and 14).

    Not applicable

  3. Provide estimates of annualized costs to the Federal government.

    Reviewing time per response:
    2
    Responses per year 500
    Reviewing time per year
    1,000
    Average Wages per hour
    $50.00
    Average cost per year
    (time * wages)
    $50,000
    Benefits and overhead
    20%
    Total Government Cost
    $60,000


  4. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjusted reported in items 13 or14 of OMB from 83-1.

    This is a new program that is being created to reach small U.S. exporters who have not previously used credit insurance. This form is a simplified versions (it contains minimal questions about the exporters sales on credit experience) of our existing multi-buyer application form. As the applicants gain experience exporting with the assistance of Ex-Im Bank’s export credit insurance, they will migrate from this application’s product to the multi-buyer insurance product which assigns to the exporter an appropriate level of discretionary buyer credit decision making authority. The users of the Express Application form will not be required to provide extensive credit decision making information, consequently these exporters will not receive any discretionary buyer credit authority. All buyer credit limits will be reviewed for the applicant exporters by Ex-Im Bank through automated and streamlined underwriting tools and processes.

  5. For collection of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will bee used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

    Not applicable.

  6. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

    Not applicable

  7. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19 “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions,” of OMB Form 83-1.

    Not applicable.

  1. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods

The agency should be prepared to justify its decision not to use statistical methods in any case where such methods might reduce burden or improve accuracy of results. When Item 17 on OMB Form 83-1 is checked, “Yes” the following documentation should be included in the Supporting Statement to the extent that it applies to the methods proposed:


Statistical methods were not used.

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions
Authorwhitt
Last Modified Bywhitt
File Modified2011-02-22
File Created2011-02-22

© 2025 OMB.report | Privacy Policy