Download:
pdf |
pdfAppendix A. Respondents and Other Assumption
Description
Percent CAFOs in AK, ID, MA, NH, NM, and OK
Percent CAFOs covered by General Permits
Annual CAFO inspection rate
Percent hearings for individual permits
%CAFOs where the permit authority require the NMP to be submitted w/
the application?
%CAFOs in authorized states where the permit authority does
comprehensive technical review
Percent of NMP that would change enough to trigger review
Reduction in permit modifications due to the availability of the narrative rate
approach
Authorized States for CAFOs
Authorized States for CAAP
Total Number of CAAP Permittees
Flow Through and Recirculating Commercial Facilities
Flow Through and Recirculating Non-Commercial Facilities
Net Pen Facilities
Total Number of CAAP Permittees in non-authorized states
Number Notes
3.4% ICR: NPDES and ELG Regulatory Revisions for Concentrated Animal Feeding
70.0% Operations (Final Rule) OMB Control Number: 2040-0250. EPA ICR: 1989.06.
20.0%
12.0%
71.51%
42.40%
45% of facilities would modify their permit once per permit cycle (5 years). 011.00% 10% would modify their permit twice. (A. Wiedeman, EPA)
ICR: NPDES and ELG Regulatory Revisions for Concentrated Animal Feeding
Operations (Final Rule) OMB Control Number: 2040-0250. EPA ICR: 1989.06.
50%
EPA retains authority for NPDES discharge permits for agricultural facilities in
Oklahoma; thus, only 44 States are authorized to issue permits to CAFOs. EPA
44 is not aware of any CAFOs in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
45 Information Collection Request: Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production
245 Effluent Guidelines. ICR No. 2087.03, OMB No. 2040-0258. September 2007
59
122
19
Information Collection Request for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Program (Renewal) OMB Control No. 2040-0004, EPA ICR
5 No. 0229.19
File Type | application/pdf |
File Title | Proposed Spreadsheet and Universe (07162009).xls |
Author | alejandro.escobar |
File Modified | 2009-07-16 |
File Created | 2009-07-16 |