60 Day Notice

44974

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Notices

Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD
20740. Send two self-addressed
adhesive labels to assist that office in
processing your request. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the report.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Gombas, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–300), Food
and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint
Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,
301–436–1807.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
The Reportable Food Registry was
created by Public Law 110–85 which
mandated that the FDA establish an
electronic portal to which industry must
and public health officials may report
when there is a reasonable probability
that an article of human food or animal
food/feed (including pet food) will
cause serious adverse health
consequences or death to humans or
animals. The Congressional intent of the
Registry is to help FDA better protect
public health by tracking patterns of
food and feed adulteration and targeting
inspection resources. This report
presents FDA’s experience with the RFR
from the opening of the Reportable Food
electronic portal on September 8, 2009,
until March 31, 2010. Because the
Registry has been operational for only a
short period, FDA cautions that it is too
early to draw inferences concerning
patterns of food and feed adulteration.

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES

II. Background
The RFR was established by section
1005 of the Food and Drug
Administration Amendments Act of
2007 (Public Law 110–85) which
amended the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act by creating a new section
417, Reportable Food Registry (21 U.S.C.
350f), and required FDA to establish an
electronic portal by which reports about
instances of reportable food must be
submitted to FDA within 24 hours by
responsible parties and may be
submitted by public health officials.
These reports may be primary, the
initial submission about a reportable
food, or subsequent, a report by either
a supplier (upstream) or a recipient
(downstream) of a food or food
ingredient for which a primary report
has been submitted.
The RFR covers all human and animal
food/feed (including pet food) regulated
by FDA except infant formula and
dietary supplements. Other mandatory
reporting systems exist for problems
with infant formula and dietary
supplements. Submissions to the

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:29 Jul 29, 2010

Jkt 220001

Reportable Food electronic portal
provide early warning to FDA about
potential public health risks from
reportable foods and increase the speed
with which the agency and its partners
at the State and local levels can
investigate the reports and take
appropriate followup action, including
ensuring that the reportable foods are
removed from commerce when
necessary.
The RFR does not receive reports
about drugs or other medical products,
reports about products under the
exclusive jurisdiction of the U.S.
Department of Agriculture, or reports
from consumers.
The RFR is helping FDA better protect
public health by tracking patterns of
adulteration in human and animal food/
feed (including pet food). The report
presents FDA’s experience with the RFR
from the opening of the Reportable Food
electronic portal on September 8, 2009,
until March 31, 2010.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the report at http://
www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/
FoodSafetyPrograms/RFR/
ucm200958.htm.
Dated: July 12, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010–18763 Filed 7–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Intent To Request Renewal From OMB
of One Current Public Collection of
Information: Sensitive Security
Information Threat Assessments
Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 60-day notice.
AGENCY:

SUMMARY: The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) invites public
comment on one currently approved
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number 1652–0042,
abstracted below that we will submit to
OMB for renewal in compliance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. The collection involves TSA
determining whether the party or
representative of a party seeking access
to sensitive security information (SSI) in

PO 00000

Frm 00041

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

a civil proceeding in federal court may
be granted access to the SSI.
DATES: Send your comments by
September 28, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be e-mailed
to [email protected] or delivered to the
TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanna Johnson at the above address, or
by telephone (571) 227–3651.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at www.reginfo.gov. Therefore,
in preparation for OMB review and
approval of the following information
collection, TSA is soliciting comments
to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
TSA is seeking to renew the control
number (1652–0042) for the maximum
three-year period in order to continue
compliance with sec. 525(d) of the
Department of Homeland Security
Appropriations Act of 2007 (DHS
Appropriations Act, Public Law 109–
295, 120 Stat 1382), as reenacted, and to
continue the process TSA developed
whereby a party seeking access to SSI in
a civil proceeding in federal court who
demonstrates a substantial need for
relevant SSI in the preparation of the
party’s case, and who is unable without
undue hardship to obtain the substantial
equivalent of the information by other
means, may request that the party or
party’s representative be granted
conditional access to the SSI at issue in
the case. The procedures also apply to

E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM

30JYN1

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 146 / Friday, July 30, 2010 / Notices
witnesses retained by a party as experts
or consultants and court reporters that
are required to record or transcribe
testimony containing specific SSI and
do not have a current security threat
clearance required for access to
classified national security information
as defined by E.O. 12958 as amended.
In order to determine if the individual
may be granted access to SSI for this
purpose, TSA will conduct a threat
assessment that includes: (1) A
fingerprint-based criminal history
records check (CHRC), (2) a name-based
check to determine whether the
individual poses or is suspected of
posing a threat to transportation or
national security, including checks
against terrorism, immigration or other
databases TSA maintains or uses; and
(3) a professional responsibility check
(for attorneys and court reporters).
TSA will use the information
collected to conduct the security threat
assessment for the purpose of
determining whether the provision of
such access to the information for the
proceeding presents a risk of harm to
the Nation. The results of the security
threat assessment will be used to make
a final determination on whether the
individual may be granted access to the
SSI at issue in the case. TSA estimates
that the total annual hour burden for
this collection will be 180 hours, based
on an estimated 180 annual respondents
and a one-hour burden per respondent.

DC 20410; telephone (202) 708–1234;
TTY number for the hearing- and
speech-impaired (202) 708–2565, (these
telephone numbers are not toll-free), or
call the toll-free Title V information line
at 800–927–7588.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the December 12, 1988
court order in National Coalition for the
Homeless v. Veterans Administration,
No. 88–2503–OG (D.D.C.), HUD
publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis,
identifying unutilized, underutilized,
excess and surplus Federal buildings
and real property that HUD has
reviewed for suitability for use to assist
the homeless. Today’s Notice is for the
purpose of announcing that no
additional properties have been
determined suitable or unsuitable this
week.

Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on July 26,
2010.
Joanna Johnson,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.

Notice of Intent To Solicit Nominations,
Western Oregon Resource Advisory
Committees

[FR Doc. 2010–18723 Filed 7–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–5375–N–29]

Federal Property Suitable as Facilities
To Assist the Homeless

srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Community Planning and
Development, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: This Notice identifies
unutilized, underutilized, excess, and
surplus Federal property reviewed by
HUD for suitability for possible use to
assist the homeless.
DATES: Effective Date: July 30, 2010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington,

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:29 Jul 29, 2010

Jkt 220001

Dated: July 22, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010–18423 Filed 7–29–10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLORE00000–
L58820000.PE0000.LXRSEE990000;
HAG10–0288]

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Call for Nominations.
SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior
is requesting 64 nominations for
representatives to serve on the Coos
Bay, Eugene, Medford, Roseburg, and
Salem District Resource Advisory
Committees (RACs). The Committees
will advise the Secretary, through the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM), on
the selection and prioritization of
projects funded under Title II of the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act. Terms will
begin on the date of appointment and
will expire three years from the date of
appointment. The initial call for
nominations, published in the Federal
Register on April 29, 2010, did not
result in a sufficient number of
candidates to fill all vacant positions.
Nominations received during the earlier
Call for Nominations will be considered
after this closing date, so applicants do
not need to submit a new form.

PO 00000

Frm 00042

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

44975

DATES: Submit nomination packages to
one or more of the addresses listed
below, on or before August 30, 2010.
ADDRESSES: Advisory Council
nomination forms are available at the
District Offices in western Oregon, and
completed nominations should be
submitted to the office of the specific
RAC where the applicant would serve:
Coos Bay District Resource Advisory
Committee: Glenn Harkleroad, 1300
Airport Lane, North Bend, Oregon
97459, (541) 756–0100;
Eugene District Resource Advisory
Committee: Pat Johnston, 3106 Pierce
Parkway, Suite E, Springfield, Oregon
97477, (541) 683–6600;
Medford District Resource Advisory
Committee: Jim Whittington, 3040
Biddle Road, Medford, Oregon 97504,
(541) 618–2200;
Roseburg District Resource Advisory
Committee: Jake Winn, 777 NW Garden
Valley Blvd., Roseburg, Oregon 97470,
(541) 440–4930; and
Salem District Resource Advisory
Committee: Richard Hatfield, 1717
Fabry Road SE, Salem, Oregon 97306,
(503) 375–5657.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pam
Robbins, Oregon/Washington Bureau of
Land Management, Oregon State Office,
PO Box 2965, Portland, Oregon 97208,
(503) 808–6306; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self Determination Act was extended to
provide stability for local counties by
compensating them, in part, for the
decrease in funds formerly derived from
timber harvests on Federal lands.
Pursuant to the Act, the five Committees
serve western Oregon BLM districts that
contain Oregon and California grant
lands and Coos Bay Wagon Road grant
lands. Committees consist of 15 local
citizens representing a wide array of
interests.
The RACs provide a mechanism for
local community collaboration with
Federal land managers as they select
projects to be conducted on Federal
lands or that will benefit resources on
Federal lands using funds under Title II
of the Act.
Committee membership must be
balanced in terms of the categories of
interest represented. Prospective
members are advised that membership
on a Resource Advisory Committee calls
for a substantial commitment of time
and energy.
Any individual or organization may
nominate one or more persons to serve
on the Committees. Individuals may
also nominate themselves or others.
Nominees must reside within one of the
counties that are (in whole or in part)

E:\FR\FM\30JYN1.SGM

30JYN1