Draft PTA

T he Privacy Office

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC 20528

703-235-0780, [email protected]

www.dhs.gov/privacy

Privacy Threshold Analysis

Version date: April 27, 2010

Page 6 of 6

PRIVACY THRESHOLD ANALYSIS (PTA)

This form is used to determine whether
a Privacy Impact Assessment is required.

Please use the attached form to determine whether a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) is required under the E-Government Act of 2002 and the Homeland Security Act of 2002. 

Please complete this form and send it to your component Privacy Office. If you do not have a component Privacy Office, please send the PTA to the DHS Privacy Office:

Rebecca J. Richards

Director of Privacy Compliance

The Privacy Office

U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC 20528

Tel: 703-235-0780

[email protected]

Upon receipt from the component Privacy Office, the DHS Privacy Office will review this form. If a PIA is required, the DHS Privacy Office will send you a copy of the Official Privacy Impact Assessment Guide and accompanying Template to complete and return.

A copy of the Guide and Template is available on the DHS Privacy Office website, www.dhs.gov/privacy, on DHSConnect and directly from the DHS Privacy Office via email: [email protected], phone: 703-235-0780.

PRIVACY THRESHOLD ANALYSIS (PTA)

Summary Information

Date submitted for review:      

Name of Project: Form N-336

Name of Component: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Name of Project Manager: Essie Bell

Email for Project Manager: [email protected]

Phone number for Project Manager: 202-272-8035

Type of Project:

Information Technology and/or System.^

A Notice of Proposed Rule Making or a Final Rule.

Form or other Information Collection.

Other: <Please describe the type of project including paper based Privacy Act system of records.>

Specific Questions

1. Describe the project and its purpose:

This form provides a method for applicants, whose applications for naturalization are denied, to request a new hearing by an Immigration Officer of the same or higher rank as the denying officer, within 30 days of the original decision.

2. Status of Project:

This is a new development effort.

This is an existing project.

Date first developed:      

Date last updated: 1/31/2009

This is a request to extend the use of the Form N-336 under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The form is set to expire on January 31, 2011.

3. Could the project relate in any way to an individual?¹

No. Please skip ahead to the next question.

Yes. Please provide a general description, below.

This form is used by an individual to appeal an unfavorable decision.

4. Do you collect, process, or retain information on: (Please check all that apply)

DHS Employees.

Contractors working on behalf of DHS.

The Public.

The System does not contain any such information.

5. Do you use or collect Social Security Numbers (SSNs)? (This includes truncated SSNs)

No.

Yes. Why does the program collect SSNs? Provide the function of the SSN and the

legal authority to do so:

<Please provide the function of the SSN and the legal authority to do so.>

6. What information about individuals could be collected, generated or retained?

Name and Alien Number (A-Number)

7. If this project is a technology/system, does it relate solely to infrastructure? [For example, is the system a Local Area Network (LAN) or Wide Area Network (WAN)]?

No. Please continue to the next question.

Yes. Is there a log kept of communication traffic?

No. Please continue to the next question.

Yes. What type of data is recorded in the log? (Please choose all that apply.)

Header.

Payload Please describe the data that is logged.

<Please list the data elements in the log.>

8. Does the system connect, receive, or share Personally Identifiable Information with any other DHS systems²?

No.

Yes.

Please list:      

9. Is there a Certification & Accreditation record within OCIO’s FISMA tracking system?

Unknown.

No.

Yes. Please indicate the determinations for each of the following:

Confidentiality: Low Moderate High Undefined

Integrity: Low Moderate High Undefined

Availability: Low Moderate High Undefined

PRIVACY THRESHOLD REVIEW

(To be Completed by the DHS Privacy Office)

Date reviewed by the DHS Privacy Office:      

Name of the DHS Privacy Office Reviewer: <Please enter name of reviewer.>

DESIGNATION

This is NOT a Privacy Sensitive System – the system contains no Personally Identifiable Information.

This IS a Privacy Sensitive System

Category of System

IT System.

National Security System.

Legacy System.

HR System.

Rule.

Other:      

Determination

PTA sufficient at this time.

Privacy compliance documentation determination in progress.

PIA is not required at this time.

PIA is required.

System covered by existing PIA:      

New PIA is required.

PIA update is required.

SORN not required at this time.

SORN is required.

System covered by existing SORN:      

New SORN is required.

DHS PRIVACY OFFICE COMMENTS

     

 The E-Government Act of 2002 defines these terms by reference to the definition sections of Titles 40 and 44 of the United States Code. The following is a summary of those definitions:

•“Information Technology” means any equipment or interconnected system or subsystem of equipment, used in the automatic acquisition, storage, manipulation, management, movement, control, display, switching, interchange, transmission, or reception of data or information. See 40 U.S.C. § 11101(6).

•“Information System” means a discrete set of information resources organized for the collection, processing, maintenance, use, sharing, dissemination, or disposition of information. See: 44. U.S.C. § 3502(8).

Note: for purposes of this form, there is no distinction made between national security systems or technologies/systems managed by contractors. All technologies/systems should be initially reviewed for potential privacy impact.

1 Projects can relate to individuals in a number of ways. For example, a project may include a camera for the purpose of watching a physical location. Individuals may walk past the camera and images of those individuals may be recorded. Projects could also relate to individuals in more subtle ways. For example, a project that is focused on detecting radioactivity levels may be sensitive enough to detect whether an individual received chemotherapy.

2 PII may be shared, received, or connected to other DHS systems directly, automatically, or by manual processes. Often, these systems are listed as “interconnected systems” in TAFISMA.