TEACH Grant Supplemental Supporting Statement 12172010 OPE

TEACH Grant Supplemental Supporting Statement 12172010 OPE.docx

Teach Grant Supplementary Data Collection

OMB: 1840-0819

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION



A. Justification


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


The Secretary of Education is required to report to Congress about the TEACH Grant Program, including the student’s:  (1) eligible field of study and (2) cost of education.  The Secretary includes these data elements as part of a report submitted to congressional authorizing committees with respect to schools and students served by Teach Grant recipient schools.  This report is required by Section 420P of the Higher Education Act, as amended by the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008.   


The law requires the Secretary of Education to submit a report every two years on TEACH grant programs to the Congress. OMB approval is requested on a regular schedule.



2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


The Department uses the information collected to prepare a Congressionally-mandated report on TEACH grants with respect to the schools and students served by recipients of such grants. The two pieces of data collected will be combined with data already collected by FSA to compile this report for Congress.



3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration given to using technology to reduce burden.


To minimize response burden, a number of steps have been taken:


  • The collection will be a website with authorized login and password. Once in the system the grantee will enter two numbers. One will be a CIP code which will be checked and limited through the use of drop down menus for the grantee to choose from. The other will be a dollar value amount for the cost of education for each student who is obtaining a TEACH grant. If proper format is not used, meaning only numbers, the system will kick out in error for the grantee to correct.



4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


This information does not duplicate any other information collection effort. No other system collects CIP codes and the cost of education0. The information is not available in other forms or as the result of other information collections.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 8b of IC Data Part 2), describe any methods used to minimize burden.


Small businesses or other small entities are not part of the target population of the information collection.



6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


Section 420P of the HEOA requires this data collection. The Secretary — and the states and institutions required to report — would be out of compliance if the information were not collected and reported in a timely manner.



7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


  • requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;


  • requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;


  • requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;


  • requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records for more than three years;


  • in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generalized to the universe of study;


  • requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;


  • that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or


  • requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


There are no special circumstances that would require this information collection to be conducted in any of the ways listed as part of this question.



  1. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency’s notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.


Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.


Consultation with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years – even if the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.


The Department of Education has published the applicable 60 and 30 day Federal Register notices seeking public comment.



9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


No payment or gift will be provided to respondents in connection with this data collection.



10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


No assurances of confidentiality are provided.



11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


The data collection includes no questions of a sensitive nature.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should :


  • Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.


  • If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in item 16 of IC Data Part 1.



  • Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.


The time required to complete this information collection is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time to review instructions, search existing data sources, gather data needed, and complete and review the information collection. The total number of grantees that will be contacted in regards to this data collection will be 488 institutions.


488 Institutions X 1 hour per institution = 488 Total Burden Hours for collection


As there are only two fields of data that the institutions already collect and a limited number of TEACH grant recipients at each institution, we do not feel there will be a cost burden associated with the collection.


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14.)



  • The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquiring and maintaining record storage facilities.


  • If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.



  • Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.


Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost :      

Total Annual Costs (O&M) :      

____________________

Total Annualized Costs Requested :      


There are no start-up costs for respondents



14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.


The annualized cost to the Federal government will be approximately $118,360. This amount was calculated based on the number of hours it would take to create the data collection system as well as collect and aggregate data collected through the system.



15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments to #16f of the IC Data Part 1 Form.


The burden increase of 488 total hours is a program change burden increase, resulting from the new legislative requirement in section 420P of the Higher Education Opportunity Act.


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


The Secretary of Education will submit a report to the Congress. That report will be based on data collected through the National Student Loan Data System (NSLDS), the Application Processing System, and the Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) System, which are due to the Secretary each year.



17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


We do not seek this approval.



18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification of Paperwork Reduction Act.


There are no exceptions to the statement, "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions" of OMB Form 83-1.




7


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT
AuthorKenneth Smith
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-02-01

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy