Form 3320-0007 Facilitated Meeting Services - Participant Questionnaire

Program Evaluation Instruments - Facilitated Meeting Services (One Instrument)

Facilitated Meeting Services Participant Questionnaire (Rev 2011)

Evaluation of Facilitated Meeting Services (Participant) - IC for Private Sector Respondents

OMB: 3320-0007

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
OMB Number: 3320-0007
Approval Expiry Date:

Facilitated Meeting/Workshop Evaluation
The U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution evaluates all of its services. As a part of this
evaluation we ask participants who have been involved in an Institute facilitated meeting to provide us with
information about their experience. Your responses will be used to improve our programs and services. The
average estimated reporting burden for this questionnaire is 5 minutes. This estimate includes time for
reviewing the instructions and completing the questionnaire. Send comments regarding this burden estimate
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the
Institute. Please note your responses to this questionnaire are confidential. The identity of individual
respondents is not recorded. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) number that is displayed on the
cover is currently valid and authorizes this collection of information.

1. What were the key meeting/workshop objectives?
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
Rating Scale
0

1

2

Do not
agree at all

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Moderately
Agree

10
Completely
agree

2. Using the scale above, please rate your agreement with the following statements:
Rating
_____

a. The topic of this meeting/workshop is important to me or my organization.

_____

b. The meeting/workshop was well organized.

_____

c. The facilities were suitable for the meeting/workshop activities.

_____

d. The presentation/delivery of materials was effective (e.g., appropriate, useful) in
reaching the meeting/workshop objectives.

_____

e. The materials (e.g., handouts) were a valuable supplement to the meeting/workshop.

_____

f.

_____

g. The presenter(s)’ interaction with the participants added value to the meeting/workshop.
 Check if Not Applicable (e.g. there were no presenters)

_____

h. The meeting/workshop attendees were able to participate effectively.

_____

i.

The facilitator(s)’ interaction with the participants added value to the meeting/workshop.

This meeting/workshop was an important opportunity for the exchange of experience and
information.

3. Please indicate the extent to which the key meeting/workshop objectives were achieved:
Check only one


Progress made on all or most key objectives



Progress made on some key objectives



We ended the meeting/workshop without
making much progress at all.

Use the space below if you
would like to elaborate:

4. Please describe the most beneficial aspects of this meeting/workshop and why they are
important to you. Please write “None” or N/A” if you feel this meeting/workshop was not beneficial.
Most beneficial aspects:

Why they are important:

5. What follow-up would you like to see happen after this meeting/workshop (e.g.,
materials made available on the web, follow-up meetings developed)?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
6. Please tell us how this meeting/workshop could have been more effective?
_________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________

Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire. Please hand in your completed
questionnaire at the end of the meeting/workshop.
1


File Typeapplication/pdf
File TitleMicrosoft Word - Facilitated Meeting Services Participant Questionnaire (Rev 2011)
Authorbridgetr
File Modified2011-11-01
File Created2011-11-01

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy