Tech Eval Surveys 30-day FR Notice

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2011 / Notices
Determinations Made by the Denver
Museum
• Based on non-destructive physical
analysis and catalogue records, the
human remains are determined to be
Native American.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), a
relationship of shared group identity
cannot be reasonably traced between the
Native American human remains and
any present-day Indian Tribe.
• According to the final judgment of
the Indian Claims Commission, the land
from which the Native American human
remains were removed is the aboriginal
land of the Assiniboine and Sioux
Tribes of the Fort Peck Indian
Reservation, Montana; Cheyenne River
Sioux Tribe of the Cheyenne River
Reservation, South Dakota; Crow Creek
Sioux Tribe of the Crow Creek
Reservation, South Dakota; Flandreau
Santee Sioux Tribe of South Dakota;
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower
Brule Reservation, South Dakota; Lower
Sioux Indian Community in the State of
Minnesota; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the
Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota;
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Ponca Tribe
of Indians of Oklahoma; Ponca Tribe of
Nebraska; Prairie Island Indian
Community in the State of Minnesota;
Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud
Indian Reservation, South Dakota;
Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska;
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux
Community of Minnesota; SissetonWahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse
Reservation, South Dakota; Spirit Lake
Tribe, North Dakota; Standing Rock
Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota;
Upper Sioux Community, Minnesota;
and Yankton Sioux Tribe of South
Dakota.
• Multiple lines of evidence,
including treaties, Acts of Congress, and
Executive Orders, indicate that the land
from which the Native American human
remains were removed is the aboriginal
land of the Arapahoe Tribe of the Wind
River Reservation, Wyoming;
Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort
Peck Indian Reservation, Montana;
Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of the
Cheyenne River Reservation, South
Dakota; Crow Creek Sioux Tribe of the
Crow Creek Reservation, South Dakota;
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe of South
Dakota; Ho-Chunk Nation of Wisconsin;
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of the Lower
Brule Reservation, South Dakota; Lower
Sioux Indian Community in the State of
Minnesota; Oglala Sioux Tribe of the
Pine Ridge Reservation, South Dakota;
Omaha Tribe of Nebraska; Pawnee
Nation of Oklahoma; Ponca Tribe of
Indians of Oklahoma; Ponca Tribe of
Nebraska; Prairie Island Indian

VerDate Mar<15>2010

13:57 Feb 17, 2011

Jkt 223001

Community in the State of Minnesota;
Rosebud Sioux Tribe of the Rosebud
Indian Reservation, South Dakota;
Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska;
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux
Community of Minnesota; SissetonWahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse
Reservation, South Dakota; Spirit Lake
Tribe, North Dakota; Standing Rock
Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota;
Upper Sioux Community, Minnesota;
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska; and
Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota.
• Finally, other credible lines of
evidence, including consultation with
Tribal representatives, indicate that the
land from which the Native American
human remains were removed is the
aboriginal land of the Arapahoe Tribe of
the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming;
Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the Fort
Peck Indian Reservation, Montana;
Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes,
Oklahoma; Crow Tribe of Montana; HoChunk Nation of Wisconsin; Iowa Tribe
of Kansas and Nebraska; Iowa Tribe of
Oklahoma; Lower Brule Sioux Tribe of
the Lower Brule Reservation, South
Dakota; Lower Sioux Indian Community
in the State of Minnesota; Northern
Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern
Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana;
Oglala Sioux Tribe of the Pine Ridge
Reservation, South Dakota; Omaha Tribe
of Nebraska; Otoe-Missouria Tribe of
Indians, Oklahoma; Pawnee Nation of
Oklahoma; Ponca Tribe of Indians of
Oklahoma; Ponca Tribe of Nebraska;
Prairie Island Indian Community in the
State of Minnesota; Rosebud Sioux
Tribe of the Rosebud Indian
Reservation, South Dakota; Sac & Fox
Nation of Missouri in Kansas and
Nebraska; Sac & Fox Nation, Oklahoma;
Sac & Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in
Iowa; Santee Sioux Nation, Nebraska;
Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux
Community of Minnesota; SissetonWahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse
Reservation, South Dakota; Spirit Lake
Tribe, North Dakota; Standing Rock
Sioux Tribe of North & South Dakota;
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort
Berthold Reservation, North Dakota;
Upper Sioux Community, Minnesota;
Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska; and
Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota.
• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the
human remains described above
represent the physical remains of two
individuals of Native American
ancestry.
• Pursuant to 43 CFR 10.11(c)(1), the
disposition of the human remains is to
The Tribes.
Additional Requestors and Disposition
Representatives of any Indian Tribe
that believes itself to be culturally

PO 00000

Frm 00074

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

9607

affiliated with the human remains or
any other Indian Tribe that believes it
satisfies the criteria in 43 CFR
10.11(c)(1) should contact Dr. Chip
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Denver
Museum of Nature & Science, 2001
Colorado Blvd., Denver, CO 80205,
telephone (303) 370–6378, before March
21, 2011. Disposition of the human
remains to The Tribes may proceed after
that date if no additional requestors
come forward.
The Denver Museum of Nature &
Science is responsible for notifying The
Tribes that this notice has been
published.
Dated: February 15, 2011.
Sherry Hutt,
Manager, National NAGPRA Program.
[FR Doc. 2011–3753 Filed 2–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–50–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection for Technical Evaluation
Surveys
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:

In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing
that the information collection request
for its Technical Evaluation customer
surveys has been forwarded to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and comment. The
information collection request describes
the nature of the information collection
and the expected burden and cost. The
OMB control number for this collection
of information is 1029–0114 and is on
the forms along with the expiration
date.

SUMMARY:

OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove the information
collection but may respond after 30
days. Therefore, public comments
should be submitted to OMB by March
21, 2011, in order to be assured of
consideration.

DATES:

Submit comments to the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Department of the
Interior Desk Officer, by telefax at (202)
395–5806 or via e-mail to OIRA
Docketomb.eop.gov. Also, please send a
copy of your comments to John

ADDRESSES:

E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM

18FEN1

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

9608

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 34 / Friday, February 18, 2011 / Notices

Trelease, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951
Constitution Ave., NW., Room 202—
SIB, Washington, DC 20240, or
electronically to [email protected].
Please refer to OMB control number
1029–0114 in your correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
receive a copy of the information
collection request contact John Trelease
at (202) 208–2783, or electronically at
[email protected]. You may also
review this collection by going to
http://www.reginfo.gov (Information
Collection Review, Currently Under
Review, Agency is Department of the
Interior, DOI–OSMRE).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB)
regulations at 5 CFR 1320, which
implement provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13),
require that interested members of the
public and affected agencies have an
opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping activities
[see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)]. OSM has
submitted a request to OMB to renew its
approval of the collection of information
contained in a series of technical
evaluation customer surveys. OSM is
requesting a 3-year term of approval for
the information collection activity.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
number for this collection of
information is 1029–0114.
As required under 5 CFR 1320.8(d), a
Federal Register notice soliciting
comments on this collection of
information was published on
November 5, 2010 (75 FR 68376). No
comments were received. This notice
provides the public with an additional
30 days in which to comment on the
following information collection
activity:
Title: Technical Evaluation Surveys.
OMB Control Number: 1029–0114.
Summary: The series of surveys are
needed to ensure that technical
assistance activities, technology transfer
activities and technical forums are
useful for those who participate or
receive the assistance. Specifically,
representatives from State and Tribal
regulatory and reclamation authorities
are the primary respondents, although
representatives of industry,
environmental or citizen groups, or the
public, may be recipients of the
assistance or may participate in these
forums. These surveys will be the
primary means through which OSM
evaluates its performance in meeting the

VerDate Mar<15>2010

13:57 Feb 17, 2011

Jkt 223001

performance goals outlined in its annual
plans developed pursuant to the
Government Performance and Results
Act.
Bureau Form Number: None.
Frequency of Collection: Once.
Description of Respondents:
Individuals who request information or
assistance, although generally States
and Tribal employees.
Total Annual Responses: 500.
Total Annual Burden Hours: 42.
Send comments on the need for the
collection of information for the
performance of the functions of the
agency; the accuracy of the agency’s
burden estimates; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and ways to
minimize the information collection
burdens on respondents, such as use of
automated means of collections of the
information, to the addresses listed
under ADDRESSES. Please refer to the
appropriate OMB control number in all
correspondence.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: February 11, 2011.
John A. Trelease,
Acting Chief, Division of Regulatory Support.
[FR Doc. 2011–3595 Filed 2–17–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–M

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–920 (Review)
(Remand)]

Certain Welded Large Diameter Line
Pipe From Mexico
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

The U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) hereby
gives notice of its remand proceeding
with respect to its negative
determination in the five-year review of
the antidumping duty order on certain
welded large diameter line pipe from
Mexico. For further information
concerning the conduct of this
proceeding and rules of general
application, consult the Commission’s

SUMMARY:

PO 00000

Frm 00075

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part
201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part
201), and part 207, subpart A (19 CFR
part 207).
DATES: Effective Date: February 18,
2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl
von Schriltz (202–205–3096), Office of
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its Internet server (http://
www.usitc.gov). The public record of
Investigation No. 731–TA–920 (Review)
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at http://
edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—In October 2007, the
Commission determined that revocation
of the antidumping duty order covering
certain welded large diameter line pipe
from Mexico would not be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time. On April 21, 2008, six months
after completion of the Commission’s
review, the Mexican producer Tuberias
Procarsa, S.A. de C.V. (‘‘Procarsa’’)
attempted to file with the Commission
a revised foreign producers’
questionnaire response which sought to
revise certain aspects of its originally
reported capacity, production, and
shipment data. On April 24, 2008, the
Commission rejected the submission on
the grounds that it was untimely filed.
On November 21, 2007, the domestic
producer United States Steel
Corporation (‘‘U.S. Steel’’) filed a request
for review of the Commission’s
determination by a binational panel
under Article 1904 of the North
American Free Trade Agreement. The
parties completed briefing in the
proceeding in 2008 and 2009. The Panel
held a hearing in the proceeding on July
22, 2010.
On January 18, 2011, the Panel issued
an opinion in the matter. In its opinion,
the Panel affirmed the Commission’s
reliance on the existence of differing
conditions of competition for Mexico
and Japan when deciding not to exercise
its discretion to cumulate the subject
imports from those countries. The Panel
also held that U.S. Steel was barred

E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM

18FEN1