"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

Service Coordinators-2007

"Logic Model" Grant Performance Report Standard

OMB: 2535-0114

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf


HUD Master Models (2007) Service Coordinators in Multifamily Housing

Service Coordinator Service Coordinators in Multifamily Housing

To ensure that elderly persons and people with disabilities who are residents of multifamily insured and assisted housing developments are linked to the supportive services they need to continue living independently.


Need Statements

There is a lack of service coordinators in multi-family housing to link low-income elderly persons and people with disabilities to the supportive services they need in order to continue living independently.

Activities and Outputs


Assist residents in applying for benefits – Benefits

Benefits

Assist residents in applying for benefits – Residents

Residents

Coordinate assisted living services

Residents

Coordinate preventive health and other educational activities

Sessions

Create a directory of community service providers

Directory

Create supportive services – Residents

Residents

Create supportive services – Services

Services

Educate property management staff on aging in place issues – Persons

Persons

Educate property management staff on aging in place issues – Sessions

Sessions

Educate property management staff on service coordination issues – Sessions

Sessions

Educate property management staff on service coordination issues – Persons

Persons

Help residents build informal support networks

Residents

Monitor the activities and services of residents

Residents

Refer residents to available supportive services – Residents

Residents

Refer residents to available supportive services – Services

Services

Train residents in obligations of tenancy – Residents

Residents

Train residents in obligations of tenancy – Sessions

Sessions

Units referred to services

Units

Work and consult with tenant organizations

Activities

Other

Other

Outcomes and Indicators

Decrease in monthly living expenses

Dollars

Receipt of healthcare services enabling independent living

Residents

Receipt of home management services enabling independent living

Residents

Reduction in eviction actions initiated due to lease violations

Evictions

Reduction in move-outs to higher level care

Residents

Units receiving services

Units

Other

Other



Measurement Tools


A. Tools to Track Outputs and Outcomes


Bank accounts

Construction log

Database

Enforcement log

Financial aid log

Intake log

Interviews

Mgt. Info. System-automated

Mgt. Info. System-manual

Outcome scale(s)

Phone log

Plans

Pre-post tests

Post tests

Program specific form(s)

Questionnaire

Recruitment log

Survey

Technical assistance log

Time sheets

Other


B. Where Data are Maintained


Agency database

Centralized database

Individual case records

Local precinct

Public database

School

Specialized database

Tax Assessor database

Training center

Other


C. Source of Data


Audit report

Business licenses

Certificate of Occupancy

Code violation reports

Counseling reports

Employment records

Engineering reports

Environmental reports

Escrow accounts

Financial reports

GED certification/diploma

Health records

HMIS

Inspection results

Lease agreements

Legal documents

Loan monitoring reports

Mortgage documents

Payment vouchers

Permits issued

Placements

Progress reports

Referrals

Sale documents

Site reports

Statistics

Tax assessments

Testing results

Waiting lists

Work plan reports

Other


D. Frequency of Data Collection


Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Quarterly

Biannually

Annually

Upon incident

Other



E. Process of Collection and Reporting


Computer spreadsheets

Flat file database

Manual tallies

Relational database

Statistical database

Other


Evaluation Process – These are standard requirements that HUD will expect every program manager receiving a grant to do as part of their project management.


  • An evaluation process will be part of the on-going management of the program.

  • Comparisons will be made between projected and actual numbers for both outputs and outcomes.

  • Deviations from projected outputs and outcomes will be documented and explained.

  • Analysis of data to determine the relationship of outputs to outcomes; what outputs produce which outcomes.


HUD Will Use The Following Questions To Evaluate Your Program


  1. How many residents received community-based services through the assistance of a Service Coordinator?

  2. How many referrals were provided to residents?

  3. What was the value in dollars of referred services provided by other community based organizations?

  4. What was the reduction (#) in move-outs to higher level care?

  5. What was the reduction (#) in eviction actions initiated due to lease violations?


Carter-Richmond Methodology


The above Management Questions developed for your program are based on the Carter-Richmond Methodology1. A description of the Carter-Richmond Methodology appears in the General Section of the NOFA.



1© The Accountable Agency – How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Public and Private Programs,” Reginald Carter, ISBN Number 9780978724924.


4


File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorManuel Valentin
Last Modified ByManuel Valentin
File Modified2007-02-16
File Created2007-01-19

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy