Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation

Forms and Documents

Forms and supporting documents for this ICR

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Att_1850-0832 v3 (4205) App Q IES Memo to OMB on Results of the Magnet Study Feasibility Phase.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-03-25	Available
Att_1850-0832 v3 (4205) App A Authorizing Legislation 4-5-07.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2010-03-25	Available
Att1850-0832 (4516)_LA MSAP SS Part B 1.24.doc	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2011-04-27	Available
Att_1850-0832 v.4 rev4-29 MSAP Part A 4.25.11.docx	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2011-04-29	Available
App K Purposes of Variables in Student Data Collection Plan 4-5-07.doc	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2007-04-06	Available

IC Document Collections

Information collection document groups

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
192303	MSAP Project Director Interview Protocol (2004-2007 Grantee Cohorts)	Other-interview guide	Removed
192301	Student Record Data Collection Plan for 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2010-2011)	Other-data collection plan	Modified
179516	2010 Principal Survey (2004 and 2007Grantee Cohorts )	Other-survey	Removed

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 1850-0832	ICR Reference No: 201102-1850-002
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201003-1850-005
Agency/Subagency: ED/IES	Agency Tracking No: 4516
Title: Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation
Type of Information Collection: Revision of a currently approved collection	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved without change	Conclusion Date: 07/14/2011
	Date Received in OIRA: 05/05/2011
Terms of Clearance:

table that charts list comparision

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	07/31/2014	24 Months From Approved	06/30/2013
Responses	20	0	50
Time Burden (Hours)	280	0	187
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: The Conversion Magnet Schools Evaluation is being conducted to determine if efforts to turn around low-performing schools through converting to a Magnet Schools Assistance Program (MSAP) supported magnet school are associated with improved student achievement and the reduction in minority group isolation. The Institute of Education Sciences, in collaboration with the Office of Innovation and Improvement, initiated the study due to the popularity and persistence of magnet programs and the inconclusive research on the relationship of these programs to important student outcomes. The study will use quasi-experimental designs to explore the relationship between magnet programs and student achievement both for "resident" students who attend magnet schools as their neighborhood schools and, if possible, for non-resident students. Data collection includes student records data, principal surveys, and project director interviews. The U.S. Department of Education has commissioned American Institutes for Research to conduct this study. An OMB clearance request that (1) described the study design and full data collection activities and (2) requested approval for the burden associated with the first three years of data collection was approved in 2007 (OMB Number 1850-0832 approval 7/13/07; expiration 7/31/10). In 2010, we requested clearance for the burden associated with the fourth and fifth year of data collection necessary for the rigorous Comparative Interrupted Time Series (CITS) design including student records data collection for the 2009-2010 school year (OMB Number 1850-0832 approval 6/14/10; expiration 6/30/13). We are now requesting clearance for the burden associated with one additional round of student records data collection (student records data from the 2010-2011 school year) from participating districts due to the later than expected implementation of the magnet programs in the 2007 grantee cohort.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): PL: Pub.L. 107 - 110 5310 Name of Law: No Child Left Behind Act
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	76 FR 10573	02/25/2011
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	76 FR 25674	05/05/2011
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? Yes

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

table that charts list of burden

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Student Record Data Collection Plan for 2007 Grantee Cohorts (2010-2011)
MSAP Project Director Interview Protocol (2004-2007 Grantee Cohorts)
2010 Principal Survey (2004 and 2007Grantee Cohorts )

---

ICR Summary of Burden

table that charts list of burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	20	50	0	-30	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	280	187	0	93	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Reduction Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Short Statement: In 2010, they requested clearance for the burden associated with the fourth and fifth year of data collection necessary for the rigorous CITS design including student records data collection for the 2009-2010 school year. (OMB Number 1850-0832 approval 6/14/10; expiration 6/30/13). The burden associated with the fourth and fifth year of data collection will be completed by the time this most recent package will be approved (anticipated late June 2011. They are now requesting clearance for the burden associated with one additional round of student records data collection (student records data from the 2010-2011 school year) from participating districts due to the later than expected implementation of the magnet programs in the 2007 grantee cohort. As prior data collection (187 hours) will be complete when this 2-year extension package is approved, the burden request in the current package is only for the one year of student records collection (280). Therefore, the burden change is +93 hours (this is the difference between the to-be-completed currently approved package burden of 187 and the currently requested burden of 280 hours).

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $556,942

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 05/05/2011

---