Investigate the Use and Feasibility of Speed Warning Systems

Forms and Documents

Document	Type	Status	Availability
Form NHTSA Form 1117 Investigate the Use and Feasibility of Speed Warning Systems	Form	Modified	Available
Attachment I - Informed Consent Form .pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-04-18	Repair queued
Attachment J - 8427 03 10 04 04 Expedited IRB Approval .pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-04-18	Available
Part A - Supporting Statement - FINAL .docx	Supporting Statement A	Uploaded 2011-04-18	Available
Part B - Supporting Statements - FINAL .docx	Supporting Statement B	Uploaded 2011-04-18	Repair queued
Attachment H - MVA Recruitment Letter to Participant .pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-02-18	Available
Attachment G - Certificate of Confidentiality .pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-02-18	Available
Attachment F - MVA Agreement Letter .pdf	Supplementary Document	Uploaded 2011-02-18	Available

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Collection	Type	Status	Form
194744	Investigate the Use and Feasibility of Speed Warning Systems	Form	Modified

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 2127-0671	ICR Reference No: 201102-2127-003
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No: 201009-2127-005
Agency/Subagency: DOT/NHTSA	Agency Tracking No:
Title: Investigate the Use and Feasibility of Speed Warning Systems
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 04/28/2011
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/28/2011
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	04/30/2014	36 Months From Approved
Responses	80	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	80	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: In this pilot study, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will be conducting on-road instrumented vehicle data collection in the Rockville, MD area with a total of 80 participants who have a history of speeding violations to examine the impact of in-vehicle speed warning devices on their driving speed patterns and speeding behavior. Participants will be asked to install a speed warning device for eight weeks. The device will provide data on travel speeds of participants' vehicle coupled with GPS information that is linked to a database with speed limits for various sections of roads in the study area. This data will be automatically transmitted from the vehicle to the research office for data analyses. After completing their on-road phase of the data collection, participating drivers will be asked to participate in a short debriefing interview while the in-vehicle warning device is removed from their vehicle. The debriefing sessions will focus on the drivers' subjective experience regarding the speed warning device – how it affected their driving behavior, any problems experienced with the device, how they interacted with the device, and their opinion of the device, as well as feedback on their experience as a participant in the research study. This subjective data will be coupled with the data from their actual driving behavior to help NHTSA develop a better understanding of speeding and speeders and the potential acceptance and effectiveness of using speed warning devices as a countermeasure to alter the speeding behavior of habitual speeders. The debriefing sessions are expected to provide data relevant to implementation issues and concerns associated with the device, as well as the key advantages and disadvantages associated with the use of this device as a countermeasure.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 23 USC 101 Name of Law: Highway Saftety Act 1970
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 26837	05/12/2010
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	75 FR 47676	08/06/2010
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Investigate the Use and Feasibility of Speed Warning Systems	NHTSA Form 1117, NHTSA Form 1116	Debriefing Session Guidelines ,   Data Collection Recruitment Screener Guide

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	80	0	0	80	0	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	80	0	0	80	0	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: Yes

Burden Increase Due to: Miscellaneous Actions

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: There is a program change as a result of this new information collection being added to NHTSA's overall program, which adds 80 burden hours.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $581,957

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? Yes Part B of Supporting Statement

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/28/2011

---