SUPPORTING STATEMENT
TD-9371, Consolidated overall foreign losses, separate limitation losses,
and overall domestic losses
OMB No. 1545-1634
1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
These regulations provide rules for the apportionment of a consolidated group’s overall foreign loss (COFL) and separate limitation loss (CSLL) accounts to a departing member. The regulations allocate a portion of a COFL or CSLL account to a departing member based upon the member's share of the group's assets that generate foreign-source income subject to recapture, as set forth in section 904. For purposes of valuing these assets, the regulations provide that a group must use the same valuation method that the taxpayer elects for interest expense allocation. The group’s determination of the value of the member’s foreign assets is binding on the member, unless the Commissioner concludes that the determination is not appropriate. Treas. Reg. §1.1502-9T(c)(2)(iv) provides that the common parent of the group must attach a statement to the return for the taxable year that the departing member ceases to be a member of the group that sets forth the name and taxpayer identification number of the departing member, the amount of each COFL or CSLL for each loss basket that is apportioned to the departing member, the method used to determine the value of the member's and the group's foreign assets in each such loss basket, and the value of the member’s and the group's foreign assets in each such loss basket. The common parent must also furnish a copy of the statement to the departing member.
2. USE OF DATA
The information is required to help the Internal Revenue Service monitor compliance with the provisions of the regulations to ensure that taxpayers use consistent asset valuations in applying the proposed regulations.
3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN
IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.
4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION
We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.
5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES
Not applicable.
6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES
Not applicable.
7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)
Not applicable.
8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS
We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice dated November 15, 2011 (75 FR 69740).
9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS
Not applicable.
10. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES
Generally, tax returns and return information are confidential as required by 26 USC 6103.
11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS
Not applicable.
12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
Treas. Reg. §1.1502-9T(c)(2)(iv) provides that the common parent of the group must attach a statement to the return for the taxable year that the departing member ceases to be a member of the group that sets forth certain information, as described in paragraph 1 above. We estimate that approximately 2,000 statements will be filed each year and that it will take approximately 1.50 hours to prepare these statements. The total time estimate for this requirement is 3,000 hours.
Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown above are not available at this time.
13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS
As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated November 15, 2010, requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers on the subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.
14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COSTS TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
Not applicable.
15. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN
There is no change to the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.
16. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION
Not applicable.
17. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE
We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the regulation sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.
18. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I
Not applicable.
Note: The following applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by section 6103 of the Code.
| File Type | application/msword |
| Author | TQ1FB |
| Last Modified By | Reference |
| File Modified | 2011-04-12 |
| File Created | 2011-04-12 |