NESHAP for Gold Mine Ore Processing (40 CFR part 63, subpart EEEEEEE) (Final Rule)

ICR 201103-2060-003

OMB: 2060-0659

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2011-03-03
IC Document Collections
ICR Details
2060-0659 201103-2060-003
Historical Active 201004-2060-018
EPA/OAR 2383.02
NESHAP for Gold Mine Ore Processing (40 CFR part 63, subpart EEEEEEE) (Final Rule)
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Approved without change 04/12/2011
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 03/03/2011
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
04/30/2014 36 Months From Approved
36 0 0
483 0 0
417,930 0 0

EPA is proposing national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants for gold mine ore processing and production. The proposed rule applies to gold mine facilities engaged in processing gold ore to recover gold using one or more of the following process units: roasters, autoclaves, carbon kilns, melt furnaces, retorts, electrowinning, and/or pregnant tanks; and have the potential to emit mercury for which the source category was listed. All gold mine facilities subject to the rule would be required to comply with emission standards for mercury. The standards are based on the maximum achievable control technology for this source category. Gold mine facilites subject to emission standards would be required to conduct a performance test to demonstrate annual compliance with the mercury standard. Monitoring requirements for gold mine facilities with roasters would include either continuous monitoring of mercury emissions from roaster stacks or weekly samples of mercury concentration, both coupled with parametric monitoring of the mercuric chloride scrubbers on roasters. EPA is proposing two options for monitoring requirements for gold mine facilities with processes controlled by carbon adsorbers: (1) sampling of the exit stream from the carbon bed for mercury and (2) sampling the carbon for adsorbed mercury. The inlet to the carbon adsorber would also be monitored for temperature. For wet scrubbers, EPA is proposing that the water flow rate or line pressure be monitored. Potential respondents include 21 existing gold mine ore processing and production facilites; no new gold mine facilites are expected during the 3-year clearance period of this ICR. Total annual responses attributable to this ICR for existing sources are two one-time notifications; notification of applicability and notification of compliance status. The final rule allows 3 years after promulgation for existing gold mine ore processing and production facilities to comply with these requirements.

US Code: 42 USC 7401 et seq Name of Law: Clean Air Act
  
None

2060-AP48 Final or interim final rulemaking 76 FR 9449 02/17/2011

No

1
IC Title Form No. Form Name
NESHAP for Gold Mine Ore Processing (40 CFR part 63, subpart EEEEEEE)

  Total Approved Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 36 0 0 36 0 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 483 0 0 483 0 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 417,930 0 0 417,930 0 0
Yes
Changing Regulations
No
This ICR covers information collection requirements in the final National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for gold mine ore processing and production sources (40 CFR part 63, subpart EEEEEEE).

$3,868
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Chuck French 919 541-7912 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
03/03/2011


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy