Draft Survey - Division of Preservation and Access (Revised)

DPA Survey for Generic Clearance 2011.pdf

General Clearance Authority to Develop Grantee Survey Instruments for the National Endowment for the Humanities

Draft Survey - Division of Preservation and Access (Revised)

OMB: 3136-0139

Document [pdf]
Download: pdf | pdf
OMB #: 3136Exp:

1. TEST SURVEY
The survey seeks information about the long-term impact of Humanities Collections and Reference Resources (HCRR)
projects you directed since 2000. These include grants originally funded in the following programs: Grants to Preserve
and Create Access to Humanities Collections, Reference Materials, and National Heritage Preservation Projects.
Please answer the following questions.

1. Type of institution:
c
d
e
f
g

Library

c
d
e
f
g

Archives

c
d
e
f
g

Museum

c
d
e
f
g

Historical society

c
d
e
f
g

College or university

Other (please specify)

2. Please indicate the year in which the grant was AWARDED. If you directed more than
one HCRR project, select the years in which each grant was awarded.
c
d
e
f
g

2000

c
d
e
f
g

2004

c
d
e
f
g

2008

c
d
e
f
g

2001

c
d
e
f
g

2005

c
d
e
f
g

2009

c
d
e
f
g

2002

c
d
e
f
g

2006

c
d
e
f
g

Not sure

c
d
e
f
g

2003

c
d
e
f
g

2007

3. List products or outcomes of your HCRR project. Include any products that became
apparent AFTER the grant period. Check all that apply.
c
d
e
f
g

Print Publication (e.g., dictionary, encyclopedia, atlas, monograph, index)

c
d
e
f
g

Online Publication (e.g, dictionary, encyclopedia, atlas, monograph, index)

c
d
e
f
g

Article

c
d
e
f
g

Conference Paper or Presentation

c
d
e
f
g

Catalog Records

c
d
e
f
g

CD-ROM

c
d
e
f
g

Finding Aid (e.g., index, bibliography, catalog)

c
d
e
f
g

Online Access to Digital Collection

c
d
e
f
g

Database

c
d
e
f
g

Social Network Site

c
d
e
f
g

Course or Curricular Materials

c
d
e
f
g

Exhibition

c
d
e
f
g

Media Production

c
d
e
f
g

Conference, Institute, Seminar, Workshop

c
d
e
f
g

Improved Storage of Collection (e.g., rehousing)

c
d
e
f
g

Preserved/Increased Access to Collection through Reformatting (e.g., microfilming, digitization of audiovisual materials)

c
d
e
f
g

Preserved/Increased Access to Collection through Conservation Treatment

Other (please specify)

5
6

4. Using the following quantitative measures, show how grant-based resources
produced since 2000 have influenced research, education, or public knowledge of the
humanities. Select all the measures that apply.

Number of users of Web-based
resources
Number of unique visitors of
Web-based resources
Other measures of Web use
(specify below)
Number of print volumes sold
or produced
Number of attendees at
exhibition
Average annual number of
researchers using special

10,000-

25,000-

50,000-

75,000-

More than

24,999

49,999

74,999

99,999

100,000

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

1-499

500-999

1,000-4,999 5,000-9,999

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

collection
Add comments

5

6

5. Indicate the degree to which the following groups have made use of grant products.
Use heavily

Use somewhat

Use not at all

Not sure/No opinion

Scholars

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

Teachers

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

Students

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

General Public

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

Other (indicate below)

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

j
k
l
m
n

Add comments

5

6

6. Has your HCRR project received reviews or coverage in the media? Select all that
apply:
c
d
e
f
g

Newspaper

c
d
e
f
g

Blog

c
d
e
f
g

Magazine

c
d
e
f
g

Journal

c
d
e
f
g

My project did not receive reviews or media coverage.

Please provide citations or other relevant information:

5

6

7. Have any grant products received awards or prizes? If so provide the following
information:
Product,Prize, Awarding Organization,
Date Awarded
Product,Prize,Awarding
Organization,Date Awarded
Product,Prize,Awarding
Organization,Date Awarded
Product,Prize,Awarding
Organization,Date Awarded
Product,Prize,Awarding
Organization,Date Awarded

8. This question addresses the long-term impact of the HCRR grant on your
organization's infrastructure, i.e., its capacity to carry out its overarching objective of
preserving and increasing access to its humanities collections or, alternatively, to
sustain the humanities reference resource it has developed. Select all that apply:
c
d
e
f
g

Improved the skills of its staff.

c
d
e
f
g

Gained experience to be able to conduct other preservation and access projects.

c
d
e
f
g

Hired or retained staff on a permanent basis.

c
d
e
f
g

Dedicated more internal resources to preservation and access activities.

c
d
e
f
g

Collaborated with other institutions to create a reference resource or to preserve a humanities collection.

c
d
e
f
g

Leveraged external funding for similar activities.

c
d
e
f
g

No long-term impact observed.

Add comments:

5

6

9. Please provide any suggestions for improving the HCRR grant program. For example,
were there activities that you would have liked to include in your project that were
outside the scope of the program, or are there emerging areas of need in your
professional field that this program might help to address?
5

6

10. Project Director: (optional)
Name:
Email Address:

Privacy policy
Information in this survey is solicited under the authority of the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act of 1965, as
amended, 20 U.S.C. 956. The principal purpose for which the information will be used is to collect additional post-award information that
will provide NEH with useful program progress information that is currently not being collected. Your responses will be used only for the
purposes described at the point of collection. If you provide contact information, NEH staff may contact you to clarify your comment or
question. We do not sell any personal information to third parties. We never collect information or create individual profiles for
commercial or marketing purposes.
Application completion time
The Office of Management and Budget requires federal agencies to supply information on the time needed to complete forms and also to
invite comments on the paperwork burden. NEH estimates that the average time to complete this survey is thirty minutes per response.
This estimate includes time for reviewing instructions, gathering the information needed, and completing and reviewing the survey.
Please send any comments regarding the estimated completion time or any other aspect of this survey, including suggestions for
reducing the completion time, to the Office of Grant Management, at [email protected] or to 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW,
Room 311, Washington, DC 20506; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (3136-____),
Washington, D.C. 20503. According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a valid OMB number.


File Typeapplication/pdf
File Modified2011-06-13
File Created2011-04-04

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy