Program Announcement

Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers
Program (I/UCRC)
PROGRAM SOLICITATION
NSF 10-595
REPLACES DOCUMENT(S):
NSF 09-565
National Science Foundation
Directorate for Engineering
Industrial Innovation and Partnerships
Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering

Letter of Intent Due Date(s) (required) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
January 02, 2011
January 2, Annually Thereafter
A letter of intent is only needed when submitting a planning grant proposal for the next
immediate deadline. If the planning grant proposal deadline is missed, a new letter of intent
needs to be submitted.
June 26, 2011
June 26, Annually Thereafter
A letter of intent is only needed when submitting a planning grant proposal for the next
immediate deadline. If the planning grant proposal deadline is missed, a new letter of intent
needs to be submitted.
Planning Grant and Full Center Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
March 06, 2011
March 6, Annually Thereafter
September 26, 2011
September 26, Annually Thereafter
Planning Grant and Full Center Proposals

IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND REVISION NOTES
Elaborated on proper counting of industry memberships during the annual certification process for continued eligibility of a
center/site.
Clarified center membership rights for associations and other institutes that have their own members as part of their
organization. Rights are for internal use only within that association.
A planning grant seeking to establish a new center requires that the proposed center and site directors participate in a "boot
camp" training program where NSF will reimburse the grantees for travel expenses. This training must be completed prior to
holding the first planning grant meeting. Alternatively, the director(s) may plan to attend, at their own expense, a scheduled
planning grant meeting for another center subject to NSF approval. This requirement does not apply to planning grants
wishing to join existing centers.
The planning grant award per site for establishing a new center has been increased from $10,000 to $11,500 for all
expenses including travel to the "boot camp."
Planning grant awardees must complete their planning grant workshop (with NSF Program Director representation) before
submitting a full proposal.
Additional funds are available to enable evaluators to support new planning grants. Evaluators for new centers must be
approved by NSF.
The communication and dissemination plan must include a copy of the proposed new I/UCRC Fact Sheet for the center
which should be accessible from http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/directory/index.jsp.
A revised version of the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG), NSF 11-1, was issued on October 1, 2010
and is effective for proposals submitted, or due, on or after January 18, 2011. Please be advised that the guidelines contained in
NSF 11-1 apply to proposals submitted in response to this funding opportunity. Proposers who opt to submit prior to January 18,
2011, must also follow the guidelines contained in NSF 11-1.
Data Management Plan: The PAPPG contains a clarification of NSF's long standing data policy. All proposals must describe plans
for data management and sharing of the products of research, or assert the absence of the need for such plans. FastLane will not
permit submission of a proposal that is missing a Data Management Plan. The Data Management Plan will be reviewed as part of
the intellectual merit or broader impacts of the proposal, or both, as appropriate. Links to data management requirements and plans
relevant to specific Directorates, Offices, Divisions, Programs, or other NSF units are available on the NSF website at:
http://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp. See Chapter II.C.2.j of the GPG for further information about the implementation of this
requirement.
Postdoctoral Researcher Mentoring Plan: As a reminder, each proposal that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers

1

must include, as a supplementary document, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such individuals.
Please be advised that if required, FastLane will not permit submission of a proposal that is missing a Postdoctoral Researcher
Mentoring Plan. See Chapter II.C.2.j of the GPG for further information about the implementation of this requirement.

SUMMARY OF PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
General Information
Program Title:
Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers Program (I/UCRC)
Synopsis of Program:
The Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers (I/UCRC) program develops long-term partnerships among
industry, academe, and government. The centers are catalyzed by a small investment from the National Science
Foundation (NSF) and are primarily supported by industry center members, with NSF taking a supporting role in
the development and evolution of the center. Each center is established to conduct research that is of interest to
both the industry members and the center faculty. An I/UCRC contributes to the Nation's research infrastructure
base and enhances the intellectual capacity of the engineering and science workforce through the integration of
research and education. As appropriate, an I/UCRC uses international collaborations to advance these goals
within the global context.
Cognizant Program Officer(s):
Rathindra (Babu) DasGupta, Lead I/UCRC Program Director, Directorate for Engineering, telephone: (703) 292-8353, fax:
(703) 292-9057, email: [email protected]
Rita Rodriguez, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, 1175 N, telephone: (703)
292-8950, fax: (703) 292-9010, email: [email protected]
Applicable Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number(s):
47.041
47.049
47.050
47.070
47.074
47.075
47.076
47.078
47.079
47.080
47.081

-----------------------

Engineering
Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Geosciences
Computer and Information Science and Engineering
Biological Sciences
Social Behavioral and Economic Sciences
Education and Human Resources
Office of Polar Programs
Office of International Science and Engineering
Office of Cyberinfrastructure
Office of Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive Research

Award Information
Anticipated Type of Award: Standard Grant or Continuing Grant
Estimated Number of Awards: 2 to 8 full center awards and 4-12 planning grant awards annually.
Anticipated Funding Amount: $10,000,000 - Funding is dependent on the availability of funds. Anticipated funding includes
continued annual support and supplemental requests for existing centers.

Eligibility Information
Organization Limit:
Proposals may only be submitted by the following:
Only U.S. academic institutions with graduate research programs may apply. Please see Section IV.
Eligibility Information for details on organizational eligibility information including:
research and graduate program requirements, and
letter of intent, planning grant, and full center proposal requirements.
PI Limit:
The PI at any institution participating in an I/UCRC proposal must be a tenured faculty member. Waivers may be
requested when petitioned for by the PI's supervisor (Chairman of the Department or the Dean). In addition, the
center or site director must be the PI.
Planning grant awardees for establishing new centers must complete their planning grant workshops (with NSF
Program Director representation) before submitting full proposals.
Eligibility to submit a full proposal to establish a new center is dependent upon the PI completing one of the
following (this does not apply to joining established centers):
NSF sponsored boot camp - NSF will reimburse the center/site director for travel expenses.
Attendance at an NSF approved planning grant meeting - not reimbursed by NSF.
Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:
Grantee institutions that have an active single university I/UCRC award are not eligible to apply for another single
university center; however, they may apply for a multi-university center.

2

Any institution may submit multiple multi-university center proposals provided that the proposed research topics
involve different disciplines and support different industries.
A center site may apply for a Phase II (years 6 through 10) proposal if it meets the Phase II minimum requirements
specified in the solicitation as well as having satisfactorily completed the Phase I (years 1 through 5).
A center site may apply for a Phase III (years 11 through 15) proposal if it meets the minimum Phase III
requirements specified in the solicitation as well as having satisfactorily completed the Phase II (years 6 through
10).
Graduated centers who have successfully completed a Phase II award within the last 10 years may apply for a
Phase III award.
Limit on Number of Proposals per PI:1
PIs with an active award for any NSF I/UCRC research center are not eligible to apply for another Phase I award.
PIs can only submit one proposal per submission period. Co-PIs can only participate in one proposal per
submission period.

Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
Letters of Intent: Submission of Letters of Intent is required. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further
information.
Preliminary Proposal Submission: Not Applicable
Full Proposals:
Full Proposals submitted via FastLane: NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide, Part I: Grant
Proposal Guide (GPG) Guidelines apply. The complete text of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF
website at: http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg.
Full Proposals submitted via Grants.gov: NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and
Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov Guidelines apply (Note: The NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is
available on the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?
ods_key=grantsgovguide)
B. Budgetary Information
Cost Sharing Requirements: Cost Sharing is required. See the section on Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations.
Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations: University recovery of indirect costs (F&A) shall be limited to 10% on the total
expenditures of industry center membership fees.
Other Budgetary Limitations: Not Applicable
C. Due Dates
Letter of Intent Due Date(s) (required) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
January 02, 2011
January 2, Annually Thereafter
A letter of intent is only needed when submitting a planning grant proposal for the next
immediate deadline. If the planning grant proposal deadline is missed, a new letter of
intent needs to be submitted.
June 26, 2011
June 26, Annually Thereafter
A letter of intent is only needed when submitting a planning grant proposal for the next
immediate deadline. If the planning grant proposal deadline is missed, a new letter of
intent needs to be submitted.
Planning Grant and Full Center Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
March 06, 2011
March 6, Annually Thereafter
September 26, 2011
September 26, Annually Thereafter
Planning Grant and Full Center Proposals

Proposal Review Information Criteria
Merit Review Criteria: National Science Board approved criteria. Additional merit review considerations apply. Please see the full
text of this solicitation for further information.

Award Administration Information
Award Conditions: Additional award conditions apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.
Reporting Requirements: Additional reporting requirements apply. Please see the full text of this solicitation for further information.

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Summary of Program Requirements
I. Introduction
II. Program Description
III. Award Information
IV. Eligibility Information
V. Proposal Preparation and Submission Instructions
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
B. Budgetary Information
C. Due Dates
D. FastLane/Grants.gov Requirements
VI. NSF Proposal Processing and Review Procedures
A. NSF Merit Review Criteria
B. Review and Selection Process
VII. Award Administration Information
A. Notification of the Award
B. Award Conditions
C. Reporting Requirements
VIII. Agency Contacts
IX. Other Information

I. INTRODUCTION
The Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers (I/UCRC) Program was initiated in 1973 to develop long term partnerships
among industry, academe and government. The National Science Foundation invests in these partnerships to promote research
programs of mutual interest, contribute to the Nation's research infrastructure base and enhance the intellectual capacity of the
engineering or science workforce through the integration of research and education. As appropriate, NSF encourages international
collaborations that advance these goals within the global context.
The I/UCRC program seeks to achieve this by:
Contributing to the nation's research enterprise by developing long-term partnerships among industry, academe, and
government;
Leveraging NSF funds with industry to support graduate students performing industrially relevant research; and
Expanding the innovation capacity of our nation's competitive workforce through partnerships between industries and
universities.
Encouraging the nation's research enterprise to remain competitive through active engagement with academic and industrial
leaders throughout the world.
To meet these needs, multi-university I/UCRCs are preferred to single-university I/UCRCs since multi-universities contribute to an
increased research base as well as to increased interaction capabilities (networking) among various members of the center. The
centers are catalyzed by a small investment from NSF and they are primarily supported by other private and public sector center
members, with NSF taking a supporting role in the development and evolution of the I/UCRC. The I/UCRC program initially offers
five-year (Phase I) continuing awards. This five-year period of support allows for the development of a strong partnership between
the academic researchers and their industrial and government members. After five years, centers that continue to meet the I/UCRC
program requirements may request support for a second five-year (Phase II) period. These awards allow centers to continue to grow
and diversify their non-NSF memberships during their Phase II period. After ten years, a Phase III award provides a third five-year
award for centers that demonstrate their viability, sustainability, and which have had a significant impact on industry research as
measured through annual reports, site visits, and adherence to I/UCRC requirements. Centers are expected to be fully supported by
industry, other Federal agencies, and state and local government partners after fifteen-years as an I/UCRC.

II. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
A comprehensive range of disciplines and skills is often necessary to address research issues of interest to industry, and thus it is
often necessary to form a consortium of universities to achieve a critical mass of interdisciplinary research capabilities for the
formation of a center. In that case, one of the universities acts as the administrative lead for the center and each university partner
research site is expected to attract industrial support for the center.
Requirements of an I/UCRC
A center in the I/UCRC Program must:
Develop a partnership among academe, industry, and other organizations participating in the center;
Consult with center members to set a defined research agenda focused on shared research interests, needs, and
opportunities;
Limit the scope of research to areas of interest by that industry and to specific research areas that are not within the scope
of other I/UCRC centers.
Share the intellectual property developed by the center among center members;
Have center members that recommend, guide, and advise on the progress of the research and contribute towards
technology transfer between universities and industry;
Have industry support that provides the primary financial resources for the center;

4

Have a center membership agreement for center members. (See the Sample Membership Agreement at
http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/sample_agreement_form.jsp/);
Have a membership agreement for members who are part of a trade organization or associations. (See the Sample
Membership Agreement for Associations and Institutes at http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/;
Meet twice a year: one of the meetings must be primarily focused on research project presentations and selection of
research projects; the other meeting must be primarily focused on presenting research findings from the research projects
selected by the center sponsors in the prior meeting;
Rely on graduate student involvement in high quality research projects, thus developing students who are knowledgeable in
industrially relevant research;
Have an interdisciplinary team of faculty and students that is diverse in gender, race, and ethnicity;
Have a center director, based at the lead administrative university, who is responsible for all center activities;
Provide reliable, accurate, and timely information about their center for the I/UCRC directory. (See Section IX. Other
Information);
Have a marketing plan that outlines how the center will grow, recruit new members, and build relationships that attract
companies to invest in the center's research;
Have effective mechanisms, such as an executive project summary (see the Purple Book on the I/UCRC web site at
http://www.ncsu.edu/iucrc/PurpleBook.htm ), that helps industry to evaluate individual research projects with respect to
project scope, budget, duration, first year deliverables, and milestones;
Have a research team capable of developing and operating a center;
Have a formal evaluation of the industry and university interaction conducted by an independent evaluator; and
Develop a technology roadmap (with input from the center members) showing the various research needs of the industry
and resources needed to meet those needs.
An I/UCRC has the following infrastructure:
Industrial Support Requirements:
Members are comprised of industrial firms, organizations, and non-NSF Federal agencies;
Members can be:
Full members - with full membership rights who support the center.
Associate members - memberships with reduced rights commensurate with their support for the center
(often a firm with fewer than 500 employees).
An example to count memberships for a center site that has a $50,000 full membership fee is as follows:
Company A paying $50,000 in membership fees counts as one full member and one vote;
Company B paying $100,000 in membership fees counts as one full member and two votes;
Company C paying $150,000 in membership fees counts as one full member and two votes per signed
membership agreement; and,
Company D paying $25,000 counts as half member and half a vote.
Thus, in this particular example, the center site has 3.5 members and membership fees totaling $325,000.
A single university center must have a minimum of $400,000 annually in membership fees with a minimum of eight
full members.
A multi-university Phase I center must have a minimum of $300,000 annually in membership fees; Multi-university
Phase II and Phase III centers must have a minimum of $350,000 annually in membership fees.
A multi-university center must have a minimum of six full members with a membership fee of $25,000 or more per
year.
Each research site in a Phase I multi-university center must have a minimum of $150,000 annually in cash
membership fees and a minimum of three full members. However, for each research site, in-kind contributions may
be allowed totaling to no more than one full membership fee for the first year of operation. After the first year,
each site must show $150,000 minimum annually in membership fees including in-kind contributions. In-kind
contributions considered to be part of the $150,000 must be approved by the Industrial Advisory Board (IAB).
Multi-university Phase II and Phase III sites must have a minimum of $175,000 in cash membership fees and a
minimum of three full members. After the first year of Phase II or Phase III, each site must show $175,000
minimum annually in membership fees including in-kind contributions. In-kind contributions considered to be part
of the $175,000 must be approved by the Industrial Advisory Board (IAB).
In-kind contributions for membership fees must be approved by the IAB.
Center policies meet NSF requirements for a Sample Membership Agreement with respect to:
intellectual capital and property rights;
access to and retention of research data; and
membership fees and member rights.
Center management and organization includes:
A center director who is responsible for all aspects of center operations;
Co-directors that manage their university team's researchers and collaborate with the administrative lead and other
sites within the center (for multi-university centers);
An Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) that reviews and recommends on all research activities;
A university policy committee that facilitates the operation of the center while ensuring that the center is operating
within the normal policies of the universities;
A uniform and consistent policy for handling memberships and member privileges across all sites of a center;
A collaborative and participative research environment;
Graduate and other student involvement; and
A plan for addressing diversity.
Other requirements of an I/UCRC include reporting and evaluation.
Centers are required to submit reports as specified in Section VII. Award Administration Information, Subsection C.
Reporting Requirements.
There must be an independent evaluator who cannot be from the department within the institution receiving funding for the
I/UCRC award. Evaluators are paid by the lead administrative institution using the formula outlined in Section III. Award
Information. These funds are intended to cover expenses and efforts expended by evaluators in the performance of their
duties. The center evaluator is responsible for:
Preparing an annual report of center activities (including the number of members at each site and the membership
fees received by each site) with respect to industrial collaboration during the previous year (which is appended to
the center's annual report to NSF);
Conducting a survey of all center participants to probe the participant satisfaction with center activities;
Compiling a set of quantitative indicators determined by NSF to analyze the management and operation of the
center;
Participating in I/UCRC center and informational meetings including:
Semi-annual Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) meetings.
Annual center director's meeting (usually held in January near NSF).
Other evaluator meetings (usually held in June near NSF).
Reporting to NSF on the center's status using a checklist provided by NSF to help determine if the center is
adhering to the I/UCRC policy and guidelines (the checklist is available on the I/UCRC homepage
http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/), under "Center Status Checklist for Evaluators;"
Bi-annual reporting to NSF on updates through an online data collection tool (instructions will be provided and
available on the I/UCRC homepage);
Reporting to NSF within a month of each IAB meeting and in consultation with the site director, on the top research
highlights, technology transfer, patents, and major discoveries that demonstrate successful NSF investments in that
center,

5

Performing exit interviews to determine why members chose to withdraw from the center; and
Participating in continuous quality process improvement by providing information to the NSF I/UCRC program
officials.
International Centers, Sites, and Partnerships
Collaboration with international research entities can advance I/UCRC objectives. A U. S.-based research site may submit a
supplement request for collaborative work with an international research entity. Supplement requests must include a:
Plan to interact with the foreign research site;
Description of the proposed research projects;
Description of the infrastructure that is in place to enable collaboration;
Formal agreement between the foreign and U.S.-based site that replicates the provisions for IP, copyrights, publication
delays, and similar issues identified in the U.S.-based center membership agreement; and
Letter from the Industry Advisory Board (IAB) that endorses the international collaboration and proposed research projects.
The U.S.- based research site's supplement expires after one year. The U.S.-based research site must, therefore, submit an annual
supplement request using FastLane for continuation of the international collaborative partnership. Each new supplemental funding
request for continuation of the international collaborative partnership must address the outcomes and benefits realized by the
international partnership in the prior award period.
Each U.S.- based center is limited to one supplement per country.
I/UCRCs may also request funding for project-specific collaborations with international partners. Please see
http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=nsf10008 for more information in the Dear Colleague Letter-Collaborative
Opportunity for Research Between IUCRCs (CORBI). International CORBI projects must also meet the five bulleted points
mentioned above for international centers.

III. AWARD INFORMATION
Planning Grant for establishing a new center - $11,500 per academic institution for a planning grant award with a 12-month duration.
The $11,500 is for all expenses including travel to the "bootcamp." In addition, the lead institution for a new center's planning grant
meeting will receive $3,000 which is to be paid directly to an evaluator. The evaluator will guide the directors in conducting a
successful planning grant meeting and attend the first planning grant meeting for a center.
For a Planning Grant seeking to join an existing center, the award amount is $10,000 per academic institution with a 12-month
duration. In addition, the institution will receive $3,000 which is to be paid directly to an evaluator. The evaluator will guide the
directors in conducting a successful planning grant meeting and attend the first planning grant meeting.
Expectations from the conclusion of a planning grant meeting:
PIs must send a list of titles of all potential industry relevant research projects including executive summaries to all potential
sponsors of the center.
Each sponsor is asked to prioritize the list of research projects showing that particular sponsor's desired 5-10 top research
projects.
Each company sends back the prioritized list of research projects to the PIs.
PIs must sort through and identify the top 5-10 research projects common to all sponsors.
PIs must report back the titles of the top 5 - 10 research projects to NSF and all potential sponsors.
PIs must list the top 5 projects in the full proposal during submission.
If awarded, these vetted research projects effectively start the first Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) meeting.
Center Awards - continuing or standard grant.
Phase I - First Five Year Center Award
Multi-institutional center proposals are given preference over single institutional proposals. The initial I/UCRC award to a center has
a potential duration of five years. NSF support is intended to augment the support that a center receives from industry and other
sponsors. The I/UCRC program uses the following funding formulas. Multi-institutional research sites with an annual industry
membership participation between $150,000 to $300,000 can receive up to $55,000 annually. (Note - the center must obtain a total
of $300,000 in membership participation to receive an award.) Multi-university research sites with $300,000 or more in annual
memberships can receive up to $80,000 annually. Single university I/UCRCs obtaining $400,000 or more in annual memberships
can receive up to $80,000 annually.
Phase II - Second Five Year Center Award
Continuing I/UCRC program support is available for centers fully meeting the I/UCRC operational and membership requirements with
industrial involvement being met each year. A new Phase II second five-year center award may be granted upon a favorable
recommendation by the NSF program director. Multi-institutional research sites with yearly memberships between $175,000 and
$350,000 will receive $40,000 annually. Multi-university research sites with over $350,000 in annual memberships will receive
$60,000 annually. (Note the center must obtain a total of $350,000 or more to receive an annual award.) Single university I/UCRCs
obtaining over $400,000 a year in memberships will receive $60,000 annually.
Phase III - Third Five Year Center Award
I/UCRC program support is available for current and graduated centers that continue to fully meet I/UCRC operational and
membership requirements. For the purpose of this solicitation, a graduated center is one that has successfully completed a Phase II
award within the last 10 years. A Phase III center award may be awarded upon NSF review and a favorable recommendation by the
NSF program director. Research sites with memberships at or above $175,000 a year will receive $15,000 annually. There will be
$25,000 available for the lead institution in a multi-university research center.
Additional Supplemental Funding and Support for the Lead Administrative Institution
The lead administrative institution is defined by the I/UCRC program as the institution that assumes primary coordination for general
management and communications of the center. The lead administrative institution for a Phase I and Phase II center receives an
additional $10,000 per year for each added institution in the center to offset the added administrative functions. The lead institution
makes an annual request for supplemental funding that represents the current number of sites within the center while factoring the
funding level for evaluator support as shown below. Contact the NSF cognizant program director listed within this document if
guidance is needed in preparing a supplement request.
Evaluator Support
In addition, NSF will provide the lead administrative institution with annual funds for an evaluator for Phase 1 and II awards as

6

outlined below. The lead institution receives the following each year, all of which must be paid to the evaluator and be reflected in
the budget:
A
A
A
A

one site center receives $9,000 for the evaluator.
two site center receives $15,000 for the evaluator.
three site center receives $18,000 for the evaluator.
four or more site center receives $21,000 for the evaluator.

The evaluator uses these funds to attend the bi-annual IAB meetings, write annual and semi-annual IAB highlight reports, and is
expected to attend the annual directors' meeting, and to attend the annual evaluators' meeting. These fees are intended to cover
expenses and efforts incurred by the evaluator.
Evaluators for a Phase III award must attend the annual IAB meeting, the evaluators' meeting, and the annual Directors' meeting for
the center. NSF provides $9,000 to the lead institution for the evaluator, all of which is paid directly to the evaluator.
Deputy Director Support
At NSF's discretion, a center with eight or more sites may submit a request for supplemental funding to help support a deputy
director. The "Deputy Director" request for supplemental funding must outline specific responsibilities that are measureable and
which will benefit all sites within the center. The funding level of these requests are based on the center phase and annual award
for the lead institution as shown below:
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase
Phase

I center with a $55,000 annual award may receive $33,000.
I center with a $80,000 annual award may receive $45,000.
II center with a $40,000 annual award may receive $25,000.
II center with a $60,000 annual award may receive $35,000.
III center with a $15,000 annual award may receive $12,000.
III center with a $25,000 annual award may receive $18,000.

International I/UCRC Support
To advance I/UCRC goals within the global context, an I/UCRC research site may receive a $25,000 supplement annually for
international collaborations. These funds are to be used for expenses related to the international collaboration including site
director(s) and evaluator international travel, and support for research visits by U. S. students and junior researchers. No NSF funds
are to be used by non U.S. participants.

IV. ELIGIBILITY INFORMATION
Organization Limit:
Proposals may only be submitted by the following:
Only U.S. academic institutions with graduate research programs may apply. Please see Section IV.
Eligibility Information for details on organizational eligibility information including:
research and graduate program requirements, and
letter of intent, planning grant, and full center proposal requirements.
PI Limit:
The PI at any institution participating in an I/UCRC proposal must be a tenured faculty member. Waivers may be
requested when petitioned for by the PI's supervisor (Chairman of the Department or the Dean). In addition, the
center or site director must be the PI.
Planning grant awardees for establishing new centers must complete their planning grant workshops (with NSF
Program Director representation) before submitting full proposals.
Eligibility to submit a full proposal to establish a new center is dependent upon the PI completing one of the
following (this does not apply to joining established centers):
NSF sponsored boot camp - NSF will reimburse the center/site director for travel expenses.
Attendance at an NSF approved planning grant meeting - not reimbursed by NSF.
Limit on Number of Proposals per Organization:
Grantee institutions that have an active single university I/UCRC award are not eligible to apply for another single
university center; however, they may apply for a multi-university center.
Any institution may submit multiple multi-university center proposals provided that the proposed research topics
involve different disciplines and support different industries.
A center site may apply for a Phase II (years 6 through 10) proposal if it meets the Phase II minimum requirements
specified in the solicitation as well as having satisfactorily completed the Phase I (years 1 through 5).
A center site may apply for a Phase III (years 11 through 15) proposal if it meets the minimum Phase III
requirements specified in the solicitation as well as having satisfactorily completed the Phase II (years 6 through
10).
Graduated centers who have successfully completed a Phase II award within the last 10 years may apply for a
Phase III award.
Limit on Number of Proposals per PI: 1
PIs with an active award for any NSF I/UCRC research center are not eligible to apply for another Phase I award.
PIs can only submit one proposal per submission period. Co-PIs can only participate in one proposal per
submission period.
Additional Eligibility Info:
A Letter of Intent (LOI) must be submitted before the institution may submit a planning grant proposal.
In general, institutions must have been awarded a planning grant before they are eligible to submit a full center
proposal. NSF may waive this requirement if the institution wants to join an existing center, has the approval from

7

the center director to join, and meets the minimum membership requirements to create a research site.
For a new research center, eligible academic institutions must have a new research focus with potential industry
members that differs significantly from those found in planned, current, and graduated I/UCRCs. Please see the
I/UCRC center directory at http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/directory/index.jsp. Institutions may participate as a
research site with these centers.

V. PROPOSAL PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
A. Proposal Preparation Instructions
Letters of Intent(required):
Guide to Submission of a Letter of Intent for an Industry/University Cooperative Research Center
Format- Letter of Intent
Letters of intent must be submitted for each proposed planning grant proposal by each institution participating in a center via
FastLane which is accessible from the NSF web site. Proposed centers are potentially viable when they:
Fit within the industry and university collaborative scope,
Are economically important to the research area, and
Do not significantly duplicate (less than 10%) of the research thrusts of other I/UCRCs.
Letter of Intent Preparation Instructions:
When submitting a Letter of Intent through FastLane in response to this Program Solicitation please note the conditions outlined
below:
Sponsored Projects Office (SPO) Submission is required when submitting Letters of Intent
A Minimum of 0 and Maximum of 2 Other Senior Project Personnel are allowed
A Minimum of 0 and Maximum of 10 Other Participating Organizations are allowed
List and describe research thrust areas (250 char. limit) is required when submitting Letters of Intent
List of participating center sites (universities - (250 char. limit) is required when submitting Letters of Intent
List of potential members (250 char. limit) is required when submitting Letters of Intent
Submission of multiple Letters of Intent is allowed
Full Proposal Preparation Instructions: Proposers may opt to submit proposals in response to this Program Solicitation via
Grants.gov or via the NSF FastLane system.
Full proposals submitted via FastLane: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation should be prepared and
submitted in accordance with the general guidelines contained in the NSF Grant Proposal Guide (GPG). The complete text
of the GPG is available electronically on the NSF website at: http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=gpg.
Paper copies of the GPG may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by email from [email protected]. Proposers are reminded to identify this program solicitation number in the program solicitation
block on the NSF Cover Sheet For Proposal to the National Science Foundation. Compliance with this requirement is critical
to determining the relevant proposal processing guidelines. Failure to submit this information may delay processing.
Full proposals submitted via Grants.gov: Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation via Grants.gov should
be prepared and submitted in accordance with the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide: A Guide for the Preparation and
Submission of NSF Applications via Grants.gov. The complete text of the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide is available on
the Grants.gov website and on the NSF website at: (http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?
ods_key=grantsgovguide). To obtain copies of the Application Guide and Application Forms Package, click on the Apply tab
on the Grants.gov site, then click on the Apply Step 1: Download a Grant Application Package and Application Instructions
link and enter the funding opportunity number, (the program solicitation number without the NSF prefix) and press the
Download Package button. Paper copies of the Grants.gov Application Guide also may be obtained from the NSF
Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from [email protected].
In determining which method to utilize in the electronic preparation and submission of the proposal, please note the following:
Collaborative Proposals. All collaborative proposals submitted as separate submissions from multiple organizations must be
submitted via the NSF FastLane system. Chapter II, Section D.4 of the Grant Proposal Guide provides additional information on
collaborative proposals.
1. Guide to Submission of a Planning Grant Proposal for an Industry/University Cooperative Research Center
Introduction- Planning Grant
Planning grant proposals are accepted only if the letter of intent describing a proposed I/UCRC has been approved
by an I/UCRC program director. Planning grants are used to plan the joint industry and university research agenda
and to determine the feasibility and viability of developing a center. The proposal is limited to 15 pages or less
excluding supplementary documents.
Note that a planning grant is submitted as a full proposal but with a title prefix of "Planning Grant:". Do not submit
a planning grant as a preliminary proposal or it will be returned without review.
Format- Planning Grant
Title - The title for a planning grant must be headed as "Planning Grant: I/UCRC for AREA" where area is the
research area for which the center is being proposed.
Project Summary - One page maximum length discussing these two topics:
Intellectual Merit of the center - See Section VI. NSF Proposal Processing and Review Procedures for
details.
Broader Impact of the center - See Section VI. NSF Proposal Processing and Review Procedures for
details.
Planning Grant Objective

8

Objective - brief statement of the planning grant's objective (which should be a meeting with industry and
university to agree on an initial research agenda to start the center.)
Strategy - how will you meet your objective?
Potential members - identify industry members who are likely to join the proposed center and the plan to
recruit them.
Meeting planning arrangements including:
Proposed location;
Meeting format and organization;
Responsibilities of staff and presenters; and
Draft agenda.
Project Description
Provide a full description for the envisioned center that serves as a blueprint for action. The project description
section should:
Provide a general analysis of the industry on which the proposed center plans to focus; how that industry
affects the Nation's economic health; and its research interests and needs, especially in those areas of
research that could be considered appropriate for the proposed center;
Provide a description of the center's capabilities to conduct research addressing the industrial needs;
Determine the proposed center's, policies, guidelines, organizational structure, and operational procedures
within the I/UCRC framework;
Determine a plan for addressing diversity;
Discuss proposed projects - a one page description for each envisioned research project covering:
experimental plan and a discussion of its industrial relevance and appropriateness for the center;
project objectives;
proposed team (management and staff);
proposed first year and end of project deliverables;
proposed experimental plan;
determination of milestones and time to completion; and
determination of annual and total cost to completion.
Include these required planning grant documents in the Supplementary Documents section of FastLane (For
Grants.gov users, supplementary documents should be attached in Field 11 of the R&R Other Project Information
Form.):
Proposed center marketing plan showing target industry or market segmentation, proposed marketing
activities (including promotion and advertising), pricing structure and membership variations;
Staffing plan with a responsibility matrix showing the roles that the proposed center director, site directors,
and other researchers will have in performing this planning study;
Sample Membership Agreement for industry partners in accordance with the I/UCRC sample agreement
at http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/sample_agreement_form.jsp);
Sample Membership Agreement for Associations and Institutes at http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/;
Universities submitting planning grant proposals seeking to join existing centers must have their
membership agreement forms aligned with the one in use at the center.
Draft Agenda - for the meeting with industrial representatives designed to determine the research agenda
and its viability; and
Potential center member letters - (six letters of interest minimum per institution) from potential organization
members noting that the center's concept and proposed research agenda have the potential for receiving
support from that organization and that they would consider joining if the center were formed. Proposals
without the sufficient number of letters may be returned without review.
Proposals for new centers with potential overlap of an existing center must provide evidence (usually a
letter from the other center director) that their research thrust does not significantly duplicate (less than
10%) other I/UCRC efforts. This evidence is not required when joining an existing center as a research
site.
Each proposal that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers must include, as a one-page
supplementary document, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such
individuals. Proposals that do not comply with this requirement will be returned without review (see
Chapter II of the NSF GPG for further information about this requirement).
Data Management Plan - the proposal must describe plans for data management and sharing of the
products of research, or assert the absence of the need for such plans.
Budget
Support is generally for travel, an industry planning meeting, associated meeting publications, and faculty time. All
line items in the proposed budget must be justified. Note any other sources of funds to be used in this study.
2. Guide to Submission of a Center Proposal for an Industry/University Cooperative Research Center
Introduction - Center Proposal
Support from NSF for Industry/University Cooperative Research Centers is awarded as seed funds to develop a
partnership between industry and academe, with NSF taking the role of a facilitator. A significant proportion of a
center's support is expected to come from industrial, state, and other funds. As a center progresses, it is likely to
have increased opportunities for funding from additional firms, other Federal agencies, Federal laboratories, and
state and local governments, thus increasing the leverage of NSF funds.
To be eligible to submit a full center proposal, institutions must have been awarded a planning grant. The
requirement for a planning grant proposal may be waived by NSF provided that the research site meets the
minimum membership requirements and has the approval from the center director to join an existing center.
In addition, the center must develop and submit a plan to ensure that the center can support graduate students
and industrially relevant research projects. The minimum number of members required produces a critical mass
and encourages a more generic research program. In general, center members are industrial firms, although some
may be other organizations such as Federal agencies.
Proposal Format- Center Proposals
The proposal should reflect the unique combination of the proposing institution's research interests, capabilities,
and potential for working with industry. These features should be discussed in sufficient detail to facilitate review in
accordance with the I/UCRC Program requirements.
Project Summary. One-page limit.
Include and address all of the following points:
Brief description of the proposed center, sites involved, and scope of the research program.

9

Intellectual Merit - See Section VI. NSF Proposal Processing and Review Procedures for details.
Broader Impact - See Section VI. NSF Proposal Processing and Review Procedures for details. Centers
are reminded that they are to address diversity.
Project Description
The following narrative outline is recommended for the project description. This narrative should be no longer than
30 pages.
A. Project Overview. Three-page limit.
In no more than three pages, describe the technical focus of and need for the center. Describe
the technical area, the industry, the industrially relevant research required, and the expertise and
resources that will be used to address this need.
B. Center Structure and Operations.
Proposers must discuss the following issues in their proposals:
Available facilities and infrastructure;
A director responsible for all activities of the center, with evidence of the director's
management capability;
The membership agreement including:
Intellectual property policies in accordance with the Bayh-Dole Act that permit
non-exclusive, royalty-free licenses for industrial center members and the
possibility of exclusive, royalty-bearing licenses;
Publication delay policies;
The membership structure of the center, as well as the role of members in the
center and the specific benefits of membership categories
Discuss potential issues that might hinder the center and what steps could be taken to
minimize those risks;
I/UCRC policies and operations;
The proposed evaluator and plans for the center to meet I/UCRC evaluation criteria; and
Membership of the university policy committee.
C. Research Plan.
Envisioned Projects - up to three pages describing each envisioned research project that
includes:
A discussion of its industrial relevance and appropriateness for the center;
Project objectives;
Proposed team (management and staff) with plans to address broadening participation;
Proposed deliverables;
Project duration, milestones, and annual proposed deliverables;
Determine business or industry need;
Describe the available research facilities; and
Determine time to completion and cost.
Budget Sheet
The proposal should include:
A separate budget detailing all sources of funding and costs;
A proposed budget for NSF funds for each of the first five years of center operation and a five-year
summary budget (including funds to support the independent evaluator); and
Budget justifications must be included for all line items.
Supplemental Docs
The following information should be added to the Supplemental Docs section of FastLane (For Grants.gov users,
supplementary documents should be attached in Field 11 of the R&R Other Project Information Form.):
A copy of the membership agreement document. For universities seeking to join existing centers, the
membership agreement must be aligned with that in use at the existing center.
A list of participating center members and their letters of financial commitment. It is imperative to include
commitment letters from potential members that meet the requirements of Section III. Award Information
for Center Awards. Proposals failing to meet the minimum funding level of committed members may be
returned without review. The minimum number of members needed is outlined in Section II. Program
Description under Requirements of an I/UCRC. The number of commitment letters must be sufficient to
meet the required number of memberships or the proposal may be returned without review.
If applicable, list collaborations with additional institutions, including any international institutions. All
policies and procedures for a center and its sites should be the same.
A list of the individuals who are key to the center, and other participating individuals, noting diversity. The
list should identify institutional and departmental affiliation or discipline, and should include biographical
information on the center director and all key faculty members or other individuals from participating
institutions who will be directly involved in the development, operation, and evaluation of the center. The
list of publications for these individuals should be limited to the five most relevant to the proposed
research.
Current and pending support for key individuals with academic affiliations who are requesting salary
support from NSF.
Marketing plans and plans for center growth over the next five years showing target industry or market
segmentation, proposed marketing activities (including promotion and advertising), pricing structure, and
membership variations.
Phase II center proposals must include the following: evaluator's report and the membership
certification for the final and fifth year of Phase I, commitment letters from potential members (if
needed), a list of key accomplishments (spin-offs, technology transfer) during Phase I, the number of
publications per year, the number of graduate students graduated each year, and the number of patents
generated per year
Phase III center proposals must include the following: evaluator's report and the membership
certification for the final and fifth year of Phase II, commitment letters from potential members (if
needed), a list of key accomplishments (spin-offs, technology transfer) during Phase II, the number of
publications per year, the number of graduate students graduated each year, and the number of patents
generated per year.
Each proposal that requests funding to support postdoctoral researchers must include, as a one-page
supplementary document, a description of the mentoring activities that will be provided for such
individuals. Proposals that do not comply with this requirement will be returned without review (see

10

Chapter II of the NSF GPG for further information about this requirement).
Data Management Plan - the proposal must describe plans for data management and sharing of the
products of research, or assert the absence of the need for such plans.

B. Budgetary Information
Cost Sharing:
Cost sharing is required. See the section on Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations.
The proposed cost sharing must be shown on Line M on the proposal budget. Documentation of the availability of cost sharing must
be included in the proposal. All cost-sharing amounts are subject to audit. Failure to provide the level of cost-sharing reflected in the
approved award budget may result in termination of the NSF award, disallowance of award costs and/or refund of award funds to
NSF.
Cost sharing on federal memberships is not required.
Indirect Cost (F&A) Limitations: University recovery of indirect costs (F&A) shall be limited to 10% on the total expenditures of
industry center membership fees. The unrecovered indirect costs on the membership fees, therefore, is the proposed cost sharing
level.

C. Due Dates
Letter of Intent Due Date(s) (required) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
January 02, 2011
January 2, Annually Thereafter
A letter of intent is only needed when submitting a planning grant proposal for the next
immediate deadline. If the planning grant proposal deadline is missed, a new letter of
intent needs to be submitted.
June 26, 2011
June 26, Annually Thereafter
A letter of intent is only needed when submitting a planning grant proposal for the next
immediate deadline. If the planning grant proposal deadline is missed, a new letter of
intent needs to be submitted.
Planning Grant and Full Center Proposal Deadline(s) (due by 5 p.m. proposer's local time):
March 06, 2011
March 6, Annually Thereafter
September 26, 2011
September 26, Annually Thereafter
Planning Grant and Full Center Proposals

D. FastLane/Grants.gov Requirements
For Proposals Submitted Via FastLane:
Detailed technical instructions regarding the technical aspects of preparation and submission via FastLane are available at:
https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/a1/newstan.htm. For FastLane user support, call the FastLane Help Desk at 1-800-673-6188 or
e-mail [email protected]. The FastLane Help Desk answers general technical questions related to the use of the FastLane
system. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed
in Section VIII of this funding opportunity.
Submission of Electronically Signed Cover Sheets. The Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) must
electronically sign the proposal Cover Sheet to submit the required proposal certifications (see Chapter II, Section C of the
Grant Proposal Guide for a listing of the certifications). The AOR must provide the required electronic certifications within
five working days following the electronic submission of the proposal. Further instructions regarding this process are
available on the FastLane Website at: https://www.fastlane.nsf.gov/fastlane.jsp.
For Proposals Submitted Via Grants.gov:
Before using Grants.gov for the first time, each organization must register to create an institutional profile. Once registered,
the applicant's organization can then apply for any federal grant on the Grants.gov website. The Grants.gov's Grant
Community User Guide is a comprehensive reference document that provides technical information about Grants.gov.
Proposers can download the User Guide as a Microsoft Word document or as a PDF document. The Grants.gov User
Guide is available at: http://www.grants.gov/CustomerSupport. In addition, the NSF Grants.gov Application Guide provides
additional technical guidance regarding preparation of proposals via Grants.gov. For Grants.gov user support, contact the
Grants.gov Contact Center at 1-800-518-4726 or by email: [email protected]. The Grants.gov Contact Center answers
general technical questions related to the use of Grants.gov. Specific questions related to this program solicitation should
be referred to the NSF program staff contact(s) listed in Section VIII of this solicitation.
Submitting the Proposal: Once all documents have been completed, the Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR)
must submit the application to Grants.gov and verify the desired funding opportunity and agency to which the application is
submitted. The AOR must then sign and submit the application to Grants.gov. The completed application will be transferred
to the NSF FastLane system for further processing.

11

VI. NSF PROPOSAL PROCESSING AND REVIEW PROCEDURES
Proposals received by NSF are assigned to the appropriate NSF program where they will be reviewed if they meet NSF proposal
preparation requirements. All proposals are carefully reviewed by a scientist, engineer, or educator serving as an NSF Program
Officer, and usually by three to ten other persons outside NSF who are experts in the particular fields represented by the proposal.
These reviewers are selected by Program Officers charged with the oversight of the review process. Proposers are invited to
suggest names of persons they believe are especially well qualified to review the proposal and/or persons they would prefer not
review the proposal. These suggestions may serve as one source in the reviewer selection process at the Program Officer's
discretion. Submission of such names, however, is optional. Care is taken to ensure that reviewers have no conflicts of interest with
the proposal.

A. NSF Merit Review Criteria
All NSF proposals are evaluated through use of the two National Science Board (NSB)-approved merit review criteria: intellectual
merit and the broader impacts of the proposed effort. In some instances, however, NSF will employ additional criteria as required to
highlight the specific objectives of certain programs and activities.
The two NSB-approved merit review criteria are listed below. The criteria include considerations that help define them. These
considerations are suggestions and not all will apply to any given proposal. While proposers must address both merit review criteria,
reviewers will be asked to address only those considerations that are relevant to the proposal being considered and for which the
reviewer is qualified to make judgements.
What is the intellectual merit of the proposed activity?
How important is the proposed activity to advancing knowledge and understanding within its own field or across
different fields? How well qualified is the proposer (individual or team) to conduct the project? (If appropriate, the
reviewer will comment on the quality of the prior work.) To what extent does the proposed activity suggest and
explore creative, original, or potentially transformative concepts? How well conceived and organized is the
proposed activity? Is there sufficient access to resources?
What are the broader impacts of the proposed activity?
How well does the activity advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching, training, and learning?
How well does the proposed activity broaden the participation of underrepresented groups (e.g., gender, ethnicity,
disability, geographic, etc.)? To what extent will it enhance the infrastructure for research and education, such as
facilities, instrumentation, networks, and partnerships? Will the results be disseminated broadly to enhance
scientific and technological understanding? What may be the benefits of the proposed activity to society?
Examples illustrating activities likely to demonstrate broader impacts are available electronically on the NSF website at:
http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/gpg/broaderimpacts.pdf .
Mentoring activities provided to postdoctoral researchers supported on the project, as described in a one-page supplementary
document, will be evaluated under the Broader Impacts criterion.
NSF staff also will give careful consideration to the following in making funding decisions:
Integration of Research and Education
One of the principal strategies in support of NSF's goals is to foster integration of research and education through
the programs, projects, and activities it supports at academic and research institutions. These institutions provide
abundant opportunities where individuals may concurrently assume responsibilities as researchers, educators, and
students and where all can engage in joint efforts that infuse education with the excitement of discovery and enrich
research through the diversity of learning perspectives.
Integrating Diversity into NSF Programs, Projects, and Activities
Broadening opportunities and enabling the participation of all citizens -- women and men, underrepresented
minorities, and persons with disabilities -- is essential to the health and vitality of science and engineering. NSF is
committed to this principle of diversity and deems it central to the programs, projects, and activities it considers
and supports.
Additional Review Criteria:
Evaluation
Letters of Intent will be evaluated by NSF staff based on the economic importance of the research area, the depth and
breadth of the proposed center's research, and whether the proposed research overlaps other I/UCRCs. The NSF evaluation
will be furnished to the author of the Letter of Intent. Notification of approval of the Letter of Intent is required before
submission of a planning grant proposal.
Planning grant proposals and full center proposals will be competitively reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel
Review, Internal NSF Review, or Site Visit Review. The proposals will be subject to the NSF merit review criteria and the
additional criteria given below:
The envisioned center is consistent with the defining characteristics and operational requirements of an I/UCRC.
There is enough potential university support, faculty, and facilities involved to build a viable center.
The planning study will effectively focus on the research interests of an industry that is in a position to support the
center, so that it could meet the requirements to submit a center proposal.
The planning study will effectively use I/UCRC operational requirements for structuring and operating the
envisioned center.
The center has an effective marketing plan to develop a strong contingent of firms and sufficient industry support
to be successful and meet the I/UCRC criteria.
The center proposes to develop a research program that does not duplicate that of an existing I/UCRC (see the
link for potential overlaps). (http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/directory/index.jsp).
The proposal requires cross-disciplinary and cross-departmental participation where appropriate to the research
envisioned.
The NSF reviewers will consider the extent to which there is evidence that the Center will meet the "Requirements
of an I/UCRC" as described in Section II. Program Description.
For I/UCRCs involving international collaborations, reviewers will consider: mutual benefits, true intellectual
collaboration with the foreign partner(s), benefits to be realized from the expertise and specialized skills, facilities,
sites and/or resources of the international counterpart, and active research engagement of U. S. students and
early- career researchers, where such individuals are engaged in the research.
Phase II and Phase III proposals will be reviewed as to their previous achievement of NSF's broader impacts,
significance and impact of previous research, and efforts of the center in communicating with the public and center
members.

B. Review and Selection Process
12

Proposals submitted in response to this program solicitation will be reviewed by Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review, Internal NSF
Review, or Site Visit Review.
Proposals that do not exceed $100,000 in annual funding such as planning grant proposals, Phase II (years 5 through 10), Phase III
(years 11 through 15), and proposals seeking to join an existing center will be reviewed internally by two or more program directors.
However, program officers may elect to obtain external reviews to inform their decision. If an external review is to be obtained, then
the PI will be so informed in the interest of maintaining the transparency of the review and recommendation process.
For I/UCRC Phase I (years 1 through 5) proposals for new centers: New Industry/University Cooperative Research Center Phase I
proposals will be subjected to Ad hoc Review and/or Panel Review.
Reviewers will be asked to formulate a recommendation to either support or decline each proposal. The Program Officer assigned to
manage the proposal's review will consider the advice of reviewers and will formulate a recommendation.
After scientific, technical and programmatic review and consideration of appropriate factors, the NSF Program Officer recommends to
the cognizant Division Director whether the proposal should be declined or recommended for award. NSF is striving to be able to tell
applicants whether their proposals have been declined or recommended for funding within six months. The time interval begins on
the deadline or target date, or receipt date, whichever is later. The interval ends when the Division Director accepts the Program
Officer's recommendation.
A summary rating and accompanying narrative will be completed and submitted by each reviewer. In all cases, reviews are treated
as confidential documents. Verbatim copies of reviews, excluding the names of the reviewers, are sent to the Principal
Investigator/Project Director by the Program Officer. In addition, the proposer will receive an explanation of the decision to award or
decline funding.
In all cases, after programmatic approval has been obtained, the proposals recommended for funding will be forwarded to the
Division of Grants and Agreements for review of business, financial, and policy implications and the processing and issuance of a
grant or other agreement. Proposers are cautioned that only a Grants and Agreements Officer may make commitments, obligations
or awards on behalf of NSF or authorize the expenditure of funds. No commitment on the part of NSF should be inferred from
technical or budgetary discussions with a NSF Program Officer. A Principal Investigator or organization that makes financial or
personnel commitments in the absence of a grant or cooperative agreement signed by the NSF Grants and Agreements Officer does
so at their own risk.

VII. AWARD ADMINISTRATION INFORMATION
A. Notification of the Award
Notification of the award is made to the submitting organization by a Grants Officer in the Division of Grants and Agreements.
Organizations whose proposals are declined will be advised as promptly as possible by the cognizant NSF Program administering
the program. Verbatim copies of reviews, not including the identity of the reviewer, will be provided automatically to the Principal
Investigator. (See Section VI.B. for additional information on the review process.)

B. Award Conditions
An NSF award consists of: (1) the award letter, which includes any special provisions applicable to the award and any numbered
amendments thereto; (2) the budget, which indicates the amounts, by categories of expense, on which NSF has based its support
(or otherwise communicates any specific approvals or disapprovals of proposed expenditures); (3) the proposal referenced in the
award letter; (4) the applicable award conditions, such as Grant General Conditions (GC-1); * or Research Terms and Conditions *
and (5) any announcement or other NSF issuance that may be incorporated by reference in the award letter. Cooperative
agreements also are administered in accordance with NSF Cooperative Agreement Financial and Administrative Terms and
Conditions (CA-FATC) and the applicable Programmatic Terms and Conditions. NSF awards are electronically signed by an NSF
Grants and Agreements Officer and transmitted electronically to the organization via e-mail.
*These documents may be accessed electronically on NSF's Website at http://www.nsf.gov/awards/managing/award_conditions.jsp?
org=NSF. Paper copies may be obtained from the NSF Publications Clearinghouse, telephone (703) 292-7827 or by e-mail from
[email protected].
More comprehensive information on NSF Award Conditions and other important information on the administration of NSF awards is
contained in the NSF Award & Administration Guide (AAG) Chapter II, available electronically on the NSF Website at
http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=aag.
Special Award Conditions:
Prior to the start of the new fiscal year and funding period, the program director, program managers, and the division director will
review the center on a number of renewal criteria including the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.

The
The
The
The

degree of collaboration amongst center sites;
extent to which the marketing plan is being pursued;
extent to which the industry/university collaborations are growing; and
extent to which the industrial research program is developing.

If the review is satisfactory, the program director may recommend support for the next period of the continuing award.

C. Reporting Requirements
For all multi-year grants (including both standard and continuing grants), the Principal Investigator must submit an annual project
report to the cognizant Program Officer at least 90 days before the end of the current budget period. (Some programs or awards
require more frequent project reports). Within 90 days after expiration of a grant, the PI also is required to submit a final project
report, and a project outcomes report for the general public.
Failure to provide the required annual or final project reports, or the project outcomes report will delay NSF review and processing of
any future funding increments as well as any pending proposals for that PI. PIs should examine the formats of the required reports
in advance to assure availability of required data.

13

PIs are required to use NSF's electronic project-reporting system, available through FastLane, for preparation and submission of
annual and final project reports. Such reports provide information on activities and findings, project participants (individual and
organizational) publications; and, other specific products and contributions. PIs will not be required to re-enter information previously
provided, either with a proposal or in earlier updates using the electronic system. Submission of the report via FastLane constitutes
certification by the PI that the contents of the report are accurate and complete. The project outcomes report must be prepared and
submitted using Research.gov. This report serves as a brief summary, prepared specifically for the public, of the nature and
outcomes of the project. This report will be posted on the NSF website exactly as it is submitted by the PI.
Annual Report for the Center
Each center site that receives NSF funding must submit an annual report 90 days before the end of their current budget period. The
annual report is used as a basis for assessing annual performance and determining continued funding. Incomplete reports are not
accepted by NSF. Evaluators also undergo an annual review that examines the completeness of their reports, participation in the
annual director's meeting, participation in the annual evaluators meeting, and the degree of their effectiveness in their center's
Industry Advisory Board (IAB) meetings.
In addition, to remain in good standing, I/UCRC Site Directors will be required to provide site status updates on a quarterly basis
through an online data collection tool.
The complete annual report has three main sections:
1. Director's Report,
2. Evaluator's Report, and
3. Certification of Membership - annual funds certification for the recently completed reporting period.
The format of the report within these three sections are:
Director's Report
Center Identification: Award number, year of initial funding, center director name and contact information.
Research Goals - goals for the current year.
Collaborations with other universities (if applicable) and names of co-director(s).
Major Accomplishments - current year scientific and technological developments, patents, reports, events, and significant
technology transferred to members and its impact on the company, the industry, and the nation. (This should be written for
the public).
Prospective Research Projects - list likely project title, duration, budget, and deliverable.
Communications and Decision Making
How does the center interact and communicate with center members?
How are the research programs planned and selected?
I/UCRC Directory Changes - changes (if any) needed to the I/UCRC directory at http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc.
Membership identification: current members, members at the start of the award, new members added, and members who
left the center.
Annual membership fees: primary, secondary, and tertiary
Evaluator's Report
Evaluators are expected to produce an annual report that incorporates information obtained via participant observation, surveys of
faculty and industry and exit interviews. Additional information about the evaluator's role, responsibility and data gathering
instruments can be found at http://www.ncsu.edu/iucrc/. The format of the report is as follows:
Overview: Provide a general overview of the center's status.
Goals and objectives: Describe the center's primary technical and organizational goals and objectives.
Environmental and Institutional: Describe any environmental (e.g., decline in industry's competitive position) or institutional or
university (e.g., partnerships with other universities, shift in university priorities) changes.
Organizational: Describe any changes in the center's personnel, structure, policies, financial status, etc.
Research Program: Describe any changes in the center's research program.
Center accomplishments: Describe any accomplishments or impact the Center has had in the following areas:
knowledge/technical advances; technology transfer; educational impacts.
Analysis: Based on the information provided above and other relevant information, comment on the health and vitality of the
Center.
Timeline: Attach an updated timeline of significant events and milestones, which have occurred over the center's lifetime.
Certification of Membership
The certification is a letter or document from an authorized university official familiar with the center that details the receipts of
annual cash membership fees or commitments.
Required Essential Data
In addition to the annual report, centers are required to provide data to NSF and its authorized representatives (contractors or
grantees.) These data are used for NSF internal reports, historical data, and for securing future funding for continued I/UCRC
program maintenance and growth. Updates to the I/UCRC database of performance indicators are required annually. Data for the
last complete fiscal year should be submitted via the web-based interface maintained by NSF or its contractors no later than
September 30. Centers are responsible for submitting this information after the award expires for their final fiscal year of activity.
These indicators are both quantitative and descriptive.
Quantitative information from the most recently completed fiscal year such as:
number and diversity of students, faculty, and industrial members involved in the center,
degrees granted to students involved in center activities,
amounts and sources of income to the center, and
lists of patents, licenses, and publications created.
Operating Budget and Total Funding
Total funding
NSF I/UCRC funding received
Other NSF funding received
Additional support broken down by Industry, State, University, Other Federal, Non-Federal, and other support.
Capital and in-kind support
Equipment
Facilities

14

Personnel
Software
Other Support
Human Resources
Researchers (number of faculty scientists and engineers, number of non-faculty scientists and engineers)
Students (number of graduate, number undergraduate)
Administration, number of full and part time professional and clerical staff.
Information about broadening participation on the above with plans to increase broadening participation, if
necessary
Center Director Descriptors
Position and Rank of the Director
Status of tenure
Name and position of the person to whom the Center Director reports
Estimate of the percent of time the director devotes to center administration, other administration, research,
teaching, other.
Center Outcomes
Students receiving degrees and type of degree earned
Students hired by industry by type of degree
Publications
number with center research
number with Industrial Advisory Board (IAB) members
number of presentations
Intellectual Property Events
Invention disclosures
Patent applications
Software copyrights
Patents granted and derived or both
Licensing agreements
Royalties Realized
I/UCRC Directory Reporting
I/UCRCs are required to provide accurate and up-to-date information that NSF can use for the online I/UCRC directory at
http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/directory/index.jsp. Instructions for updating and reporting web site information can be found at
http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/directory/instructions.jsp.

VIII. AGENCY CONTACTS
General inquiries regarding this program should be made to:
Rathindra (Babu) DasGupta, Lead I/UCRC Program Director, Directorate for Engineering, telephone: (703) 292-8353, fax:
(703) 292-9057, email: [email protected]
Rita Rodriguez, Program Director, Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering, 1175 N, telephone: (703)
292-8950, fax: (703) 292-9010, email: [email protected]
For questions related to the use of FastLane, contact:
FastLane Help Desk, telephone: 1-800-673-6188; e-mail: [email protected].
For questions relating to Grants.gov contact:
Grants.gov Contact Center: If the Authorized Organizational Representatives (AOR) has not received a confirmation
message from Grants.gov within 48 hours of submission of application, please contact via telephone: 1-800-518-4726; email: [email protected].

IX. OTHER INFORMATION
The NSF Website provides the most comprehensive source of information on NSF Directorates (including contact information),
programs and funding opportunities. Use of this Website by potential proposers is strongly encouraged. In addition, National Science
Foundation Update is a free e-mail subscription service designed to keep potential proposers and other interested parties apprised
of new NSF funding opportunities and publications, important changes in proposal and award policies and procedures, and upcoming
NSF Regional Grants Conferences. Subscribers are informed through e-mail when new publications are issued that match their
identified interests. Users can subscribe to this service by clicking the "Get NSF Updates by Email" link on the NSF web site.
Grants.gov provides an additional electronic capability to search for Federal government-wide grant opportunities. NSF funding
opportunities may be accessed via this new mechanism. Further information on Grants.gov may be obtained at
http://www.grants.gov.
Related Programs:
Sources for additional information:
Visit http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/ for information on unsolicited proposal submissions, interagency
transfers, tie-projects, MIPRs, and other general information about the I/UCRC program.
The Typical Agreement for I/UCRCs can be found at
http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/sample_agreement_form.jsp
The Directory of I/UCRCs can be found at http://www.nsf.gov/eng/iip/iucrc/directory/index.jsp
Programs in which I/UCRCs may participate can be found at http://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=IIP

ABOUT THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
15

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is an independent Federal agency created by the National Science Foundation Act of 1950,
as amended (42 USC 1861-75). The Act states the purpose of the NSF is "to promote the progress of science; [and] to advance the
national health, prosperity, and welfare by supporting research and education in all fields of science and engineering."
NSF funds research and education in most fields of science and engineering. It does this through grants and cooperative agreements
to more than 2,000 colleges, universities, K-12 school systems, businesses, informal science organizations and other research
organizations throughout the US. The Foundation accounts for about one-fourth of Federal support to academic institutions for basic
research.
NSF receives approximately 40,000 proposals each year for research, education and training projects, of which approximately
11,000 are funded. In addition, the Foundation receives several thousand applications for graduate and postdoctoral fellowships. The
agency operates no laboratories itself but does support National Research Centers, user facilities, certain oceanographic vessels
and Antarctic research stations. The Foundation also supports cooperative research between universities and industry, US
participation in international scientific and engineering efforts, and educational activities at every academic level.
Facilitation Awards for Scientists and Engineers with Disabilities provide funding for special assistance or equipment to enable
persons with disabilities to work on NSF-supported projects. See Grant Proposal Guide Chapter II, Section D.2 for instructions
regarding preparation of these types of proposals.
The National Science Foundation has Telephonic Device for the Deaf (TDD) and Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS)
capabilities that enable individuals with hearing impairments to communicate with the Foundation about NSF programs, employment
or general information. TDD may be accessed at (703) 292-5090 and (800) 281-8749, FIRS at (800) 877-8339.
The National Science Foundation Information Center may be reached at (703) 292-5111.
The National Science Foundation promotes and advances scientific progress in the United States by competitively awarding
grants and cooperative agreements for research and education in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering.
To get the latest information about program deadlines, to download copies of NSF publications, and to access abstracts of
awards, visit the NSF Website at http://www.nsf.gov
Location:

4201 Wilson Blvd. Arlington, VA 22230

For General Information
(NSF Information Center):

(703) 292-5111

TDD (for the hearing-impaired):

(703) 292-5090

To Order Publications or Forms:
Send an e-mail to:

[email protected]

or telephone:

(703) 292-7827
(703) 292-5111

To Locate NSF Employees:

PRIVACY ACT AND PUBLIC BURDEN STATEMENTS
The information requested on proposal forms and project reports is solicited under the authority of the National Science Foundation
Act of 1950, as amended. The information on proposal forms will be used in connection with the selection of qualified proposals;
and project reports submitted by awardees will be used for program evaluation and reporting within the Executive Branch and to
Congress. The information requested may be disclosed to qualified reviewers and staff assistants as part of the proposal review
process; to proposer institutions/grantees to provide or obtain data regarding the proposal review process, award decisions, or the
administration of awards; to government contractors, experts, volunteers and researchers and educators as necessary to complete
assigned work; to other government agencies or other entities needing information regarding applicants or nominees as part of a
joint application review process, or in order to coordinate programs or policy; and to another Federal agency, court, or party in a
court or Federal administrative proceeding if the government is a party. Information about Principal Investigators may be added to
the Reviewer file and used to select potential candidates to serve as peer reviewers or advisory committee members. See Systems
of Records, NSF-50, "Principal Investigator/Proposal File and Associated Records," 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004), and
NSF-51, "Reviewer/Proposal File and Associated Records, " 69 Federal Register 26410 (May 12, 2004). Submission of the
information is voluntary. Failure to provide full and complete information, however, may reduce the possibility of receiving an award.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, an information collection unless it displays a
valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number. The OMB control number for this collection is 3145-0058. Public
reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 120 hours per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions. Send comments regarding the burden estimate and any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Suzanne H. Plimpton
Reports Clearance Officer
Division of Administrative Services
National Science Foundation
Arlington, VA 22230
Policies and Important Links

|

Privacy

|

FOIA

|

Help

|

Contact NSF

The National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, Virginia 22230, USA
Tel: (703) 292-5111, FIRS: (800) 877-8339 | TDD: (800) 281-8749

16

|

Contact Web Master

|

SiteMap

Last Updated:
11/07/06
Text Only