30-Day Notice 1006-0028

46322

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 2, 2011 / Notices

The selected alternative will enable
visitors to experience the park at an NPS
developed and managed visitor center
and at visitor focal areas owned and
managed by the NPS and key partners.
The NPS and the key partners will
coordinate interpretive programs at
these sites. Visitors will access the park
via auto-touring routes and an extensive
system of non-motorized trails that
provide opportunities for interpretation
and recreation, connect focal areas, and
tie to communities and resources
outside the park. The NPS and the key
partners will develop a coordinated
land protection plan focused on
acquisition of cultural landscapes,
sensitive natural resource areas, and
lands providing connections between
NPS and key partner properties. The
NPS and the key partners will have
formal agreements that define
responsibilities for special projects,
programs, events, and specific park
operations.
This decision is the result of a public
planning process that began in 2005.
Between 2005 and 2008, prior to the
release of the Draft GMP/EIS, NPS staff
met with and briefed representatives
from numerous agencies and
organizations about the GMP and NPS’s
future plans Cedar Creek and Belle
Grove NHP. Additional public
involvement activities followed the
release of the Draft GMP/EIS and a
detailed analysis of public comments
received and NPS responses are
provided in Appendix F of the Final
GMP/EIS.
Copies of the Record of Decision may
be obtained from the above contact or
online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov/
cebe.
Dated: April 15, 2011.
Dennis R. Reidenbach,
Regional Director, Northeast Region, National
Park Service.
[FR Doc. 2011–19520 Filed 8–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–AR–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
Agency Information Collection
Activities Under OMB Review; Renewal
of a Currently Approved Collection
(OMB Control Number 1006–0028)
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:

The Bureau of Reclamation
has forwarded the following Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval: Recreation Visitor
Use Surveys. The ICR describes the
nature of the information collection and
its expected cost burden.
DATES: OMB has up to 60 days to
approve or disapprove this information
collection, but may respond after 30
days; therefore, public comment must
be received on or before September 1,
2011.
SUMMARY:

Please send your comments
to the Desk Officer for the Department
of the Interior at the Office of
Management and Budget, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, via
facsimile to (202) 395–5806, or e-mail to
[email protected]. A copy
of your comments should also be
directed to the Bureau of Reclamation,
Attention: Jerome Jackson (84–53000),
P.O. Box 25007, Denver, CO 80225–
0007, or directed via e-mail to
[email protected]. Please reference
OMB No. 1006–0028 in your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information or a copy of the
proposed forms, contact Jerome Jackson
at the above address, or at (303) 445–
2712.
ADDRESSES:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Title: Recreation Visitor Use Surveys.
Abstract: The Bureau of Reclamation
is responsible for recreation
development at all of its reservoirs.

Presently, there are 289 designated
recreation areas on our lands within the
17 Western States. We must be able to
respond to emerging trends, changes in
the demographic profile of users,
changing values, needs, wants and
desires, and conflicts between user
groups. Statistically valid and up-todate data derived from the user is
essential to developing and providing
recreation programs relevant to today’s
visitor.
The required 60-day comment period
for the Recreation Visitor Use Surveys
was initiated by a notice published in
the Federal Register on March 22, 2011
(76 FR 15997). One comment regarding
the surveys was received on March 22,
2011. The comment suggested that the
surveys are expensive, a waste of time,
should not be conducted more often
than every 5 years, or defunded and
alleviated. However, implementation of
the survey is in compliance with the
Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement
Act (REA), Public Law 108–447, enacted
on December 8, 2004. The 11 surveys
are each designed to enhance visitor
satisfaction of Reclamation recreation
areas and response to the surveys is
completely voluntary.
Frequency: One time survey.
Respondents: Respondents to the
surveys will be members of the public
engaged in recreational activities on our
lands. The surveys target people
engaged in specific activities such as
boating on a specific lake/river, or
people camping at a developed
campground. Visitors will primarily
consist of local residents, people from
large metropolitan areas in the vicinity
of the lake/river, and visitors from out
of state.
Estimated Total Number of
Respondents: 6,141.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.0.
Estimated Total Number of Annual
Responses: 6,141.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2,044.

ESTIMATE OF BURDEN FOR EACH FORM
Burden
estimate per
survey
(in minutes)

erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Survey instrument

Marina Survey ......................................................................
Campground Survey ............................................................
River Instream Flow Survey ................................................
Reservoir Preferred Water Level Survey .............................
Lake and River Visit Expenditure Survey ............................
Recreation Activities Survey ................................................
Recreation Management Survey .........................................
Recreation Fee Survey ........................................................
Recreation Development Survey .........................................
Water Level Impact on Recreation Boating Use Survey .....

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:03 Aug 01, 2011

Jkt 223001

PO 00000

Frm 00056

Number of
surveys
(times/yr.)

20
25
25
25
15
25
20
10
10
20

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Number of
respondents
per survey
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2
2

E:\FR\FM\02AUN1.SGM

278
278
278
278
278
278
278
581
278
278

02AUN1

Total
Estimated
number of
respondents
556
556
556
556
556
556
556
581
556
556

Total Annual
hour
burden
185
232
232
232
139
232
185
97
93
185

46323

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 148 / Tuesday, August 2, 2011 / Notices
ESTIMATE OF BURDEN FOR EACH FORM—Continued
Burden
estimate per
survey
(in minutes)

Survey instrument

Number of
respondents
per survey

Total
Estimated
number of
respondents

Total Annual
hour
burden

River Recreation Quality Survey .........................................

25

2

278

556

232

Totals ............................................................................

........................

........................

........................

6,141

2,044

In addition, there are an estimated
1,575 number of contacts who will not
respond.
These nonrespondents account for 13
total burden hours per year.
Comments
Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of our functions, including
whether the information will have
practical use;
(b) The accuracy of our burden
estimate for the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) Ways to enhance the quality,
usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(d) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on
respondents.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. Reclamation will
display a valid OMB control number on
the forms.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment, including your
personal identifying information, may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Dated: July 26, 2011.
Roseann Gonzales,
Director, Policy and Administration.
erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Number of
surveys
(times/yr.)

[FR Doc. 2011–19514 Filed 8–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010

15:03 Aug 01, 2011

Jkt 223001

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–382 and 731–
TA–798–803 (Second Review)]

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From
Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico,
and Taiwan
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (Commission) determines,
pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.1675(c)), that
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on stainless steel sheet and strip
from Germany, Italy, and Mexico 2
would not be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of material
injury to an industry in the United
States within a reasonably foreseeable
time and that revocation of the
countervailing duty order on stainless
steel sheet and strip from Korea and
revocation of the antidumping duty
orders on stainless steel sheet and strip
from Japan, Korea, and Taiwan 3 would
be likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission instituted this
review on June 1, 2010 (75 FR 30437)
and determined on September 7, 2010
that it would conduct a full review (75
FR 59744, September 28, 2010). Notice
of the scheduling of the Commission’s
review and of a public hearing to be
held in connection therewith was given
by posting copies of the notice in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane dissenting with
respect to stainless steel sheet and strip from
Germany, Italy, and Mexico, and Commissioner
Dean A. Pinkert dissenting with respect to stainless
steel sheet and strip from Mexico.
3 Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun and
Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson dissenting with
respect to stainless steel sheet and strip from Japan,
Korea, and Taiwan.

PO 00000

Frm 00057

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Washington, DC, and by publishing the
notice in the Federal Register on
December 27, 2010 (75 FR 81308). The
hearing was held in Washington, DC, on
May 25, 2011, and all persons who
requested the opportunity were
permitted to appear in person or by
counsel.
The Commission transmitted its
determination in these reviews to the
Secretary of Commerce on July 27, 2011.
The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 4244
(July 2011), entitled Stainless Steel
Sheet and Strip From Germany, Italy,
Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Taiwan:
Investigation Nos. 701–TA–382 and
731–TA–798–803 (Second Review).
Issued: July 27, 2011.
By order of the Commission.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–19475 Filed 8–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Notice of Receipt of Complaint;
Solicitation of Comments Relating to
the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:

Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint
entitled In Re Certain Light-Emitting
Diodes and Products Containing Same,
DN 2837; the Commission is soliciting
comments on any public interest issues
raised by the complaint.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James R. Holbein, Secretary to the
Commission, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2000. The public version of the
complaint can be accessed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at http://edis.usitc.gov, and will be
available for inspection during official
business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.)
in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
SUMMARY:

E:\FR\FM\02AUN1.SGM

02AUN1