EP PI Survey-OMB SupportingStatement B_7 Feb 2011

EP PI Survey-OMB SupportingStatement B_7 Feb 2011.doc

Process Evaluation of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Program (NIDA)

OMB: 0925-0637

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf



SUPPORTING STATEMENT B for


Process Evaluation of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Program (NIDA)



May 2011






Social & Scientific Systems, Inc. (SSS) with funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)

Genevieve deAlmeida-Morris, Ph.D., MPH.,

Office of Science Policy and Communications

NSC - Neuro Science Center, 5229

6001 Executive Blvd

Rockville, MD 20852

Phone: 301-594-6802

Fax: 301-480-2485

E-mail: [email protected]


Contents





ATTACHMENTS for Supporting Statement B:

Attachment B-1: Introductory Email from NIH Program Staff

Attachment B-2: Initial Contact Email for Survey Invitation to Participant

Attachment B-3: Survey Reminder Email Notices

Process Evaluation of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Program


SUPPORTING STATEMENT


Part B



B. COLLECTIONS OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS


Analysis for this study will employ descriptive, non-inferential methods of analysis. The following information is provided.


  1. Respondent Universe and Sampling Methods

The respondent universe includes the entire population of Principal Investigators (PI) [grantees] from the 53 NIH grants of the Roadmap Epigenomics Program. There is no sampling plan.


  1. Procedures for the Collection of Information

For the PI survey of the NIH Roadmap Epigenomics Program’s process evaluation, we expect a response rate of 100% since this is a required activity for every grantee (PI). Specialized sampling procedures are not required.

To initiate the PI survey, NIH Program staff will send an introductory email to PIs. This email will inform them about the PI survey and that they (the PIs) will be contacted by email by Social and Scientific Systems (SSS) the evaluation Contractor for this study and who will be conducting the survey. (See participant-contact schedule shown in Table B.2-1 below with referenced attachments.) PIs will then receive from SSS an email request (including a URL link to the survey with a study ID along with survey directions) for their participation in the survey, with collateral materials explaining the survey’s purpose and use of the information collection, the non-personal nature of the information including protection by blinding, and analyses to be conducted in the aggregate only. Only participants who have been provided with an ID number and password will have access to the online research instrument. All PIs will be asked to complete the survey within two (2) weeks. Quality control measures will include data logging checks prior to and during the study. Participants will receive up to two e-mail reminders (a week apart beginning 2 weeks after the survey invitation is sent).

Table B.2-1 Participant Recruitment Contacts

Contact Item

Timing (from time of first contact)

Attachment Number

Introductory email from NIH Program staff

Day 1

B-1

Follow-up email from SSS survey liaison with survey URL, log-in ID, password

Days 1-2

B-2

First reminder email asking for completion within 5 days

Day 14

B-3

Second reminder email asking for completion within 3 days

Day 21

B-3

Phone contact for any PIs who haven’t completed survey

Day 28-29




  1. Methods to Maximize Response Rates and Deal With Nonresponse

Very little nonresponse, if any, is expected because the proposed process evaluation is a requirement for every grantee receiving funding under the Roadmap Epigenomics Program, and because this universe is a small number of respondents (53). Re-contact for their response will be highly effective.

To maximize response rates and to ensure that each grantee will complete the questionnaire as expeditiously as possible, the survey will be introduced to the Principal Investigators by email contact from the NIH Program staff, as described above. After PIs receive the email with survey directions and the URL for the web survey and a period of 2 weeks has elapsed, two subsequent reminders will be emailed a week apart, if needed, with the goal of achieving a 100% response rate.


  1. Test of Procedures or Methods to be Undertaken

Participants will complete the information collection questionnaire for the process evaluation. All analyses will be descriptive. Frequency analyses will be conducted. The survey instrument will be pretested to ensure that the content flow, mechanics, and automation are satisfactory, and will be revised if needed. The pretest data will be downloaded and examined to ensure the appropriate output.


  1. Individuals Consulted on Statistical Aspects and Individuals Collecting and/or Analyzing Data

The Evaluation Project Officer is Dr. Genevieve deAlmeida-Morris from NIDA. The Project Officer, the two NIH Evaluation Leads from NIDDK and NIEHS, and at least three NIH Science Program staff, and the Contractor will review the final report, including data analysis. The Project Officer will direct the project. Table B.5-1 below shows the individuals who will be consulted on conduct of the project, data collection, and data analysis, or who will collect and analyze data.


Table B.5 - 1 Individuals’ Roles

Name and Title

Affiliation and Phone Number

Statistical Role

Susan Griffey, DrPH, BSN

Evaluation Project Director

Social & Scientific Systems, tel: 301.628.0340

Data collection and analysis

Genevieve deAlmeida-Morris, Ph.D, MPH

Planning & Evaluation Officer

NIDA, tel: 301.594.6802

Advising on data collection and analysis

Kathryn Paez, PhD, MBA, RN

Senior Evaluator

Social & Scientific Systems, tel: 301.628.0428

Data collection and analysis

David Roessner, PhD, MS

Academic Advisor and Evaluation Expert

Social & Scientific Systems, tel: 928.713.0942

Consulting on data collection and analysis

Bernard Weissman, PhD

Epigenetics Expert

Consultant for Social & Scientific Systems, tel: 919.966.7533

Consulting on data collection and analysis



In addition, Contractor research and web technical assistants will also assist with data collection.



Feb. 7, 2010: EP PI Survey-OMB Supporting Statement B 7

File Typeapplication/msword
Authortberry
Last Modified Bydealmeig
File Modified2011-05-13
File Created2011-02-07

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy