Rule 3a68-2 (Interpretation of Swaps, Security-Based Swaps, and Mixed Swaps) and Rule 3a68-4(c) (Process for Determining Regulatory Treatment for Mixed Swaps)

ICR 201105-3235-004

OMB: 3235-0685

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
Supporting Statement A
2011-05-24
Supplementary Document
2011-05-17
ICR Details
3235-0685 201105-3235-004
Historical Inactive
SEC TM-270-641
Rule 3a68-2 (Interpretation of Swaps, Security-Based Swaps, and Mixed Swaps) and Rule 3a68-4(c) (Process for Determining Regulatory Treatment for Mixed Swaps)
New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)   No
Regular
Comment filed on proposed rule 06/25/2011
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 05/24/2011
Pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.11(c), OMB files this comment on this information collection request (ICR). In accordance with 5 CFR 1320, OMB is withholding approval at this time. The agency shall examine public comment in response to the NPRM and will include in the supporting statement of the next ICR--to be submitted to OMB at the final rule stage--a description of how the agency has responded to any public comments on the ICR, including comments on maximizing the practical utility of the collection and minimizing the burden.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
36 Months From Approved
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

Proposed rule 3a68-2 would create a process for interested persons to request a joint interpretation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission regarding whether a particular instrument (or class of instruments) is a swap, a security-based swap, or both (i.e., a mixed swap). Proposed rule 3a68-4(c) would establish a process for persons to request that the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission issue a joint order permitting such persons (and any other person or persons that subsequently lists, trades, or clears that class of mixed swap) to comply, as to parallel provisions only, with specified parallel provisions of either the Commodity Exchange Act or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and related rules and regulations, instead of being required to comply with parallel provisions of both the CEA and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For purposes of rule 3a68-4(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, "parallel provisions" means comparable provisions of the CEA and the Exchange Act that were added or amended by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to security-based swaps and swaps, and the rules and regulations thereunder.

US Code: 15 USC 77c, 77d, 77g, 77j, 77s, 77z-2 Name of Law: Securities Act of 1933
   US Code: 15 USC 78c, 78d, 78e, 78f, 78g, 78i.. Name of Law: Securities Exchange Act of 1934
   US Code: 15 USC 80a-20, 80a-23, 80a-29, 80a-37 Name of Law: Investment Company Act of 1940
   US Code: 15 USC 7201 Name of Law: Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   US Code: 18 USC 1350 Name of Law: Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002
   US Code: 12 USC 5221(e)(3) Name of Law: Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008
   US Code: 15 USC 80b-3, 80b-4, 80b-11 Name of Law: Investment Advisers Act of 1940
  
PL: Pub.L. 111 - 203 712(a)(8), 712(d) Name of Law: Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010

3235-AL14 Proposed rulemaking 76 FR 29818 05/23/2011

No

No
No
This is a new, proposed rule, and therefore the associated burdens are new. The annual time burden is estimated at 670 hours.

$0
No
No
No
Yes
No
Uncollected
Leah Drennan 202 551-5507

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
05/24/2011


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy