1660-0039 30 Day PUBLISHED FRN 6-28-11

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

37824

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Notices

addition will allow for a new function
of the system for selected BKMS users,
who are authorized to explore IC/LE
data (which may contain PII).
System: DHS/TSA/PIA–033
Enterprise Search Portal (ESP).
Component: Transportation Security
Administration (TSA).
Date of approval: May 5, 2011.
DHS TSA is implementing a search
capability to enable authorized users to
search or discover data held by separate
databases within TSA. The search
function will be known as the ESP. TSA
is conducting this PIA to assess privacy
impacts associated with this capability
to search across multiple databases. The
systems being searched are covered by
other PIAs or are otherwise compliant
with the E–Government Act of 2002.
System: DHS/USCIS/PIA–030(b) E–
Verify RIDE Update.
Component: United States Citizenship
and Immigration Services (USCIS).
Date of approval: May 6, 2011.
USCIS Verification Division has
developed a new enhancement to the E–
Verify Program entitled Records and
Information from Department of Motor
Vehicles for E–Verify (RIDE). RIDE
enhances the integrity of the E–Verify
Program by verifying information from
the most commonly presented identity
documents (e.g. employee’s driver’s
license, driver’s permit, or state-issued
identification card) for employment
authorization, when the issuing state or
jurisdiction of those documents has
established a Memorandum of
Agreement with the DHS to participate
in RIDE. USCIS is conducting this PIA
update to assess the privacy risks and
mitigation strategies for this new
enhancement.
System: DHS/TSA/PIA–034
Enterprise Performance Management
Platform (EPMP).
Component: TSA.
Date of approval: May 10, 2011.
TSA EPMP is designed to assist in
performing security management
functions using a wide variety of data
associated with security, equipment,
and screening processes from TSA’s
security activities. EPMP will now
maintain PII about members of the
public in excess of basic contact
information, which requires TSA to
conduct a new PIA. This PIA focuses on
the portions of EPMP using PII.
System: DHS/USCG/PIA–004 Law
Enforcement Information Data Base
(LEIDB)/Pathfinder.
Component: USCG.
Date of approval: May 11, 2011.
The LEIDB/Pathfinder system has
undergone a PIA 3-Year Review
requiring no changes and continues to
accurately relate to its stated mission.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:46 Jun 27, 2011

Jkt 223001

USCG, a component of DHS established
the LEIDB/Pathfinder. LEIDB/Pathfinder
archives text messages prepared by
individuals engaged in USCG law
enforcement, counter terrorism,
maritime security, maritime safety and
other USCG missions enabling
intelligence analysis of field reporting.
USCG has conducted this PIA because
the LEIDB/Pathfinder system collects
and uses PII.
System: DHS/TSA/PIA–001 Vetting
and Credentialing Screening Gateway
System (CSG) .
Component: TSA.
Date of approval: May 18, 2011.
The CSG system has undergone a PIA
3-Year Review and requires an update to
accurately relate to its stated mission.
The Consolidated Screening Gateway is
the system of hardware, software and
communications infrastructure used by
the Transportation Security
Administration to conduct security
threat assessments on various
transportation workers and other
populations related to transportation.
System: DHS/ICE/PIA–015(b)
Enforcement Integrated Database (EID)
ENFORCE Alien Removal Module
(EARM 3.0) Update.
Component: Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Date of approval: May 20, 2011.
The EID is a DHS shared common
database repository for several DHS law
enforcement and homeland security
applications. EID, which is owned and
operated by U.S. ICE, captures and
maintains information related to the
investigation, arrest, booking, detention,
and removal of persons encountered
during immigration and criminal law
enforcement investigations and
operations conducted by ICE, U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP),
and USCIS, agencies within DHS. DHS
personnel access the data in EID using
the ENFORCE suite of software
applications: ENFORCE Apprehension
Booking Module (EABM), ENFORCE
Alien Detention Module (EADM), and
ENFORCE Alien Removal Module
(EARM). The PIA for EID was published
in January 2010 and last updated in
September 2010. ICE is now deploying
an upgrade to the ENFORCE
applications, referred to as EARM
version 3.0 (EARM 3.0), to merge two of
the ENFORCE applications, and to
modify the data collected by DHS, the
capabilities of the software, and certain
system interfaces. These changes require
an update to the EID PIA.

PO 00000

Frm 00059

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Dated: June 20,2011.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011–16160 Filed 6–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–9L–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[Docket ID FEMA–2011–0009]

Agency Information Collection
Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request, OMB No.
1660–0039; FEMA Form 078–0–2A,
National Fire Academy (NFA) LongTerm Evaluation Student/Trainee;
FEMA Form 078–0–2, NFA Long-Term
Evaluation Supervisors
AGENCY: Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice; 30-day notice and
request for comments; extension,
without change, of a currently approved
information collection; OMB No. 1660–
0039; FEMA Form 078–0–2A (Presently
FEMA Form 95–59), NFA Long-Term
Evaluation Student/Trainee; FEMA
Form 078–0–2 (Presently FEMA Form
95–58), NFA Long-Term Evaluation
Supervisors.
SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) will
submit the information collection
abstracted below to the Office of
Management and Budget for review and
clearance in accordance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. The submission
will describe the nature of the
information collection, the categories of
respondents, the estimated burden (i.e.,
the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and
the actual data collection instruments
FEMA will use.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before July 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
on the proposed information collection
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget. Comments
should be addressed to the Desk Officer
for the Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via
electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed
to (202) 395–5806.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or

E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM

28JNN1

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 124 / Tuesday, June 28, 2011 / Notices
copies of the information collection
should be made to Director, Records
Management Division, 1800 South Bell
Street, Arlington, VA 20598–3005,
facsimile number (202) 646–3347, or email address [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Collection of Information

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Title: National Fire Academy Longterm Evaluation Form for Supervisors
and National Fire Academy Long-term
Evaluation Form for Students/Trainees.
Type of Information Collection:
Extension, without change, of a
currently approved information
collection.
OMB Number: OMB No. 1660–0039.
Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA
Form 078–0–2A, NFA Long-Term
Evaluation Student/Trainee; FEMA
Form 078–0–2, NFA Long-Term
Evaluation Supervisors.
Abstract: The National Fire Academy
Long-Term Evaluation Form will be
used to evaluate all National Fire
Academy (NFA) on-campus resident
training courses. Course graduates and
their supervisors will be asked to
evaluate the impact of the training on
both individual job performance and the
fire and emergency response
department/community where the
student works. The data provided by
students and supervisors is used to
update existing NFA course materials
and to develop new courses that reflect
the emerging issues/needs of the
Nation’s fire service.
Affected Public: State, local or Tribal
Government.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
4,500.
Frequency of Response: Once.
Estimated Average Hour Burden per
Respondent: .16 burden hours.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 697.5 burden hours.
Estimated Cost: There are no annual
start-up or capital costs.
Dated: June 22, 2011.
Lesia M. Banks,
Director, Records Management Division,
Mission Support Bureau, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2011–16122 Filed 6–27–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–45–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010

16:46 Jun 27, 2011

Jkt 223001

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery
AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, Department of Homeland
Security.
ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for
comments; Establishment of a new
information collection.
SUMMARY: As part of a Federal
Government-wide effort to streamline
the process to seek feedback from the
public on service delivery, U.S. Customs
and Border Protection has submitted a
Generic Information Collection Request
(Generic ICR): ‘‘Generic Clearance for
the Collection of Qualitative Feedback
on Agency Service Delivery ’’ to OMB
for approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.) This document is published to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies. This proposed
information collection was previously
published in the Federal Register (75
FR 80542) on December 22, 2010,
allowing for a 60-day comment period.
DATES: Written comments should be
received on or before July 28, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
this proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget. Comments should be addressed
to the OMB Desk Officer for Customs
and Border Protection, Department of
Homeland Security, and sent via
electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed
to (202) 395–5806.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
encourages the general public and
affected Federal agencies to submit
written comments and suggestions on
proposed and/or continuing information
collection requests pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act (Pub. L. 104–
13). Your comments should address one
of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency/component,
including whether the information will
have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agencies/components estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of

PO 00000

Frm 00060

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

37825

information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collections of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
techniques or other forms of
information.
Title: Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery.
Abstract: The information collection
activity will garner qualitative customer
and stakeholder feedback in an efficient,
timely manner, in accordance with the
Administration’s commitment to
improving service delivery. By
qualitative feedback we mean
information that provides useful
insights on perceptions and opinions,
but are not statistical surveys that yield
quantitative results that can be
generalized to the population of study.
This feedback will provide insights into
customer or stakeholder perceptions,
experiences and expectations, provide
an early warning of issues with service,
or focus attention on areas where
communication, training or changes in
operations might improve delivery of
products or services. These collections
will allow for ongoing, collaborative and
actionable communications between the
Agency and its customers and
stakeholders. It will also allow feedback
to contribute directly to the
improvement of program management.
Feedback collected under this generic
clearance will provide useful
information, but it will not yield data
that can be generalized to the overall
population. This type of generic
clearance for qualitative information
will not be used for quantitative
information collections that are
designed to yield reliably actionable
results, such as monitoring trends over
time or documenting program
performance. Such data uses require
more rigorous designs that address: the
target population to which
generalizations will be made, the
sampling frame, the sample design
(including stratification and clustering),
the precision requirements or power
calculations that justify the proposed
sample size, the expected response rate,
methods for assessing potential nonresponse bias, the protocols for data
collection, and any testing procedures
that were or will be undertaken prior
fielding the study. Depending on the
degree of influence the results are likely
to have, such collections may still be
eligible for submission for other generic

E:\FR\FM\28JNN1.SGM

28JNN1