0109-labor-09-SSA

Supporting Statement

AGRICULTURAL LABOR SURVEY

OMB No. 0535-0109

This is a request for continuing approval of the NASS Labor Survey. There are no changes to the methodology or procedures previously approved in April 2006. Only minor changes have been made to the questionnaire’s format and sample size.

A. JUSTIFICATION

1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

Agricultural labor statistics are an integral part of the primary function of the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), which is the collection, processing, and dissemination of current State, regional, and national agricultural statistics. Wage rate estimates have been published since 1866 and U.S. farm employment estimates have been published since 1910. The 1938 Agricultural Adjustment Act, as amended in 1948, requires the Department of Agriculture to provide wage rate data for computation of an index component for parity prices. General authority for these data collection activities is granted under U.S. Code Title 7, Section 2204 which specifies that "The Secretary of Agriculture shall procure and preserve all information concerning agriculture which he can obtain ... by the collection of statistics ... and shall distribute them among agriculturists."

Comprehensive and reliable agricultural labor data are also needed by the Department of Labor for setting "Adverse Effect Wage Rates" (AEWR) and in the administration of the "H-2A" program for non-immigrants who enter the United States for temporary or seasonal agricultural labor. The Federal Register notice prepared by the Department of Labor that specifies the Agricultural Labor Survey figures used to determine the adverse effect wage rates is attached to this docket.

The Agricultural Labor Survey is the only timely and reliable source of information on the size of the farm worker population. The decennial population census which previously collected this information has conceded that, because of undercount issues, the agricultural labor data from the decennial census should not be used.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, requires USDA to compute parity prices of farm products. This computation uses an index of Prices Paid by Farmers which in turn is composed of five indexes, one of which is an index of wage rates. Wage rate estimates are the most widely used component of the agricultural labor survey program. These estimates measure actual agricultural wage rates and the year-to-year changes.

Under the H-2A program for agriculture, part of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, agricultural employers are permitted to employ foreign workers only if domestic workers are unavailable and the employment of foreign workers will not adversely affect wages and working conditions of U.S. agricultural workers employed in similar work. The wage rate offered by agricultural employers is a critical factor in determining the number of domestic workers who apply for work and ensuring that foreign workers cause no adverse effect on American farm workers. The minimum wage rate offered by agricultural employers as a requirement for employing foreign workers is determined by Federal regulations (CFR 655.107 Adverse Effect Wage Rates).

Number of workers and hours worked data are used to estimate agricultural productivity. The Employment Standards Administration in the Department of Labor uses estimates of agricultural workers in conjunction with their estimates of employment covered by the Fair Labor Standard Act of 1938, as amended.

Agricultural workers are estimated in four categories--field workers, livestock workers, field and livestock workers, and all hired workers--to provide a basis for meaningful comparison with the nonagricultural sector and to determine the impact of changes in the level of the Federal minimum wage.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis in the Department of Commerce relies on the number of hired agricultural workers, hours worked, and wages paid as components in personal and national income for the agricultural sector of the gross domestic product (GDP). Legislatures and policy makers use agricultural labor data when setting policy that affects the farm sector. It is very important that consideration be given to the farm sector under all types of legislation since the food and fiber system as a whole accounts for approximately 6-7 percent of the Nation’s total economic activity in terms of GDP and an equal percent of the total labor force.

Survey data on workers and wage rates help ensure that assistance programs providing federal assistance for farm workers are supported with government funding. The Agricultural Labor Survey provides employment data for equitable allocation and distribution of these funds to where seasonal workers need housing and education.

Changes in wage rates help measure the changes in costs of production of major farm commodities. Cost of production estimates are used by policy makers to help determine farm program supports–target prices, loan rates, and the milk support price. Price supports affect all farmers directly or indirectly. Price supports for grain farmers, for example, generally result in “adequate” grain supplies and “reasonable” grain prices for livestock producers.

The Agricultural Labor Survey provides data that can be used to measure the availability of farm workers across the Nation, and be used to help determine if there is a shortage of farm laborers.

Labor data are used by policy makers in determining immigration policies. Analysts use the data to evaluate the effect of changes in the immigration and labor laws on producers, wage rates, and costs of production.

Agricultural labor data are used by farm worker organizations to help set wage rates and negotiate labor contracts as well as to determine the need for additional workers. They are also used by private and government agencies responsible for the planning and placement of farm workers and that work closely with employer and labor crew chiefs.

The Economic Research Service in USDA also uses wage rate data to estimate labor costs for crop and livestock enterprise budgets.

3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.

Web-based data reporting is available for these quarterly surveys; examples of the Web screens are included in the attachment with paper questionnaires. The Web response has averaged between 1.0 and 2.0 percent of completed reports for calendar year 2008.

4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.

The National Agricultural Statistics Service cooperates with State departments of agriculture and land grant universities to conduct agricultural surveys. These surveys meet both State and Federal needs, thus eliminating duplication and minimizing reporting burden on the agricultural industry. For example, NASS has worked jointly with the California Employment Development Department (EDD) since January 1997 to use one labor questionnaire for both organizations. This administrative data provided to NASS by EDD eliminates the possibility of operators reporting similar data to two government agencies. Respondent burden is reduced by collecting data for both the State of California and USDA during only one data collection effort.

The Agricultural Labor Survey is the only timely and reliable source of information on the size of the farm worker population. Data collected on this survey are not available from any other source.

5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize burden.

Information requested for agricultural labor can be provided with a minimum of difficulty by the respondent. Farms using a small number of workers generally provide the needed data without having to consult their record books, while large labor users can respond by using their normal day-to-day operating records.

Small farm operations that are not on our list frame and are only located on our area frame are contacted once a year during the July quarterly survey and are estimated the remaining three quarterly surveys.

NASS uses a "skip technique" on data collection instruments for agricultural labor surveys. Once certain information--such as expected peak number of hired workers during the year, operating arrangement, gross value of sales, and other related information--is initially collected, these questions are not asked again during the survey year. The information is carried forward, reducing respondent burden.

Generally a pre-survey letter and sample of the questionnaire are mailed to respondents each quarter before the survey begins, alerting them that an interviewer will be contacting them. The sample questionnaire familiarizes respondents with the questions that will be asked and provides them with the opportunity to record the information in advance of the enumerator contact. This reduces interview time and allows the respondent to assemble the needed information at his or her convenience. If operators prefer to provide their data over the internet that option is available too, through our Electronic Data Repository (EDR) system.

6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.

Collecting information less frequently would not produce the timely estimates required to monitor seasonal variations in the agricultural labor work force or provide data for government needs as required by law.

7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the general information guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5.

There are no special circumstances associated with the Agricultural Labor Survey.

8. Provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8 (d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments.

The Notice soliciting comments on this collection was published in the Federal Register on December 4, 2008 on page 73906. The notice announced the intent to renew the data collection project for 3 years. No public comments were received.

Describe efforts to consult with persons outside the agency to obtain their views on the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instructions and record-keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be recorded, disclosed, or reported.

NASS stays in constant contact with Department-level personnel involved with agricultural labor policy. In addition, each year NASS conducts a series of meetings at various sites across the United States to maintain a dialogue with farmers and industry leaders to discuss issues relevant to the NASS program; agricultural labor is one of the areas highlighted in these meetings. Consultations with the Department of Labor, the Economic Research Service, and the Bureau of Economic Analysis are ongoing.

9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents.

There are no payments or gifts to respondents.

10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

The sample of the questionnaire that is mailed to respondents prior to the survey contains a burden statement. Respondents are also told as part of the interview that individual reports are confidential. U.S. Code Title 18, Section 1905 and Title 7, Section 2276 provide for the confidentiality of reported information. All employees of NASS and all enumerators hired and supervised under a cooperative agreement with the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) must read the regulations and sign a statement of compliance. (NASDA Certification of Confidentiality is attached.)

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature.

There are no questions of a sensitive nature.

12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I. Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories.

Burden hour calculations are shown below. The minutes-per-response figures come from telephone and field enumerator experience with previous labor surveys.

Reporting time of 11,425 hours is multiplied by $24 per hour, for a total cost to the public of $274,200.

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record-keepers resulting from the collection of information.

There is no cost burden to respondents.

14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government; provide a description of the method used to estimate cost which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses, and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.

The total cost to the Federal government for the agricultural labor survey is unchanged at $3.0 million.

15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I (reasons for changes in burden).

The overall reduction in burden hours is due to several factors. We are now incorporating California labor data that is provided by the California State Government in place of conducting a survey in California. This has resulted in a decrease in the list frame component (see table in item 12) which is conducted quarterly. We have increased the size of our Area Frame sample, which is only conducted in July to get a better indication of trends in farm labor. This has resulted in a combined reduction in the responses by 3,328. Finally, using the recently updated data on our List Frame (data collected from the Census of Agriculture 0535-0226) our list sample sizes in States other than California were adjusted to accommodate changes in the US farm numbers. The net decrease in burden due to program changes is estimated at 1,357 hours. The new total burden is 11,425 hours.

The increase in total responses is due to the inclusion of non-responses to pre-survey publicity materials that were omitted from the previous submission.

16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.

Agricultural labor survey data collection procedures include periodic national statistician training schools and regular enumerator training sessions in each field office.

Data from the list frame are collected quarterly--July, October, January, and April--during the 2-week period following the survey reference week, which is the Sunday through Saturday period containing the 12th of the survey month. This is the same week specified by other government agencies which deal with employment and wage series. Attached to this supporting statement are the survey questionnaires, as shown in the table below; list and area frames use the same versions. The primary questionnaire is used in all States except for FL and HI. Florida and Hawaii each have their own State specific questionnaire. The agricultural services version and the quality control sheet are also attached. Estimates are published approximately 30 days after the survey reference date; all agricultural labor releases can be found on the Web at http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pfl-bb/.

17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.

There is no request for approval of non-display of the expiration date.

18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19, “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions” of OMB Form 83-I.

There are no exceptions to the certification statement.

February 2009