Form 1 CGH Global Meeting Survey

NCI Global Cancer Research Day 2013
Survey
OMB NO: 0925-0642
EXPIRATION DATE: 09/30/2014
Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per
response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining
the information needed, and completing and reviewing the collected information. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to: NIH, Project Clearance Branch, 6705 Rockledge
Drive, MSC 7974, Bethesda, MD 20892-7974, ATTN: PRA (0925-0642). Do not return the completed form to this
address.

1. Overall, how would you rate the Global Cancer Research Day 2013 event?
Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Very poor

2. How useful were the following sessions?
Very useful

Presentation: Ted Trimble Perspectives from the NCI
Center for Global Health
Roundtable Session 1:
Maximizing Health Through
Cancer Research
Presentation: Mike Merson Global Cancer and Global
Health: Working to Reduce the
Burden of Global Cancer
Roundtable Session 2:
Building Sustainable Cancer
Research
Presentation: Jim Hoxie, Paul
Volberding, Corey Casper Global Oncology and the NIH
Centers for AIDS Research

Somewhat
useful

Neutral

Not
particularly
useful

Not at all
useful

3. Please indicate which roundtable topics produced discussions of interest to you. (Choose all that
apply.)
Cancer Prevention and Control
Cancer Biology in Low-Resource Settings
Treatment and Clinical Research in Low-Resource Settings
Evidence to Implementation
Training
Collaborative Mechanisms
Infrastructure and Capacity Building
Learning Lessons from Global Health
4. Please indicate whether you agree with the following statements:
Strongly
Disagree

Disagree

The roundtable sessions allowed
enough time for discussion
Facilitators were able to help
keep the discussions on topic
Facilitators encouraged
participants to articulate how they
might work together
Facilitators encouraged everyone
at the table to participate
The roundtable topics were
specific enough to stimulate
robust discussion
The roundtable topics were
broad enough for all to participate
The mix of people at the tables
encouraged rich discussion

4a. Do you have specific feedback about the roundtable sessions?

Neutral

Agree

Strongly
Agree

5. Please indicate your level of satisfaction with the following:
Very
Unsatisfied

Unsatisfied

Neutral

Satisfied

Very
Satisfied

Ease of online meeting
registration
Check-in on the day of the
meeting
Conference center location
Meeting room space
Clarity of meeting objectives and
format

5a. Please describe any specific problems you encountered with logistics.

6. As NCI's Center for Global Health plans a potential second Global Cancer Research Day meeting in
2014, what would you recommend keeping the same and what would you recommend changing?

7. With regard to a second Global Cancer Research Day Meeting in 2014 in conjunction with the CUGH
Annual Meeting:
Strongly
Disagree
How likely are you to attend?
How likely are you to recommend
the meeting to others?

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly
Agree

8. Did you follow up with anyone you met at the Global Cancer Research Day?
Yes
No
8a. If yes, how many people did you follow up with?

9. If you answered yes to question 8, which of the following best describes your rationale for following
up with the individual(s) you contacted? (Check all that apply.)
Explore collaboration on a specific research project/initiative
Discuss a training initiative
Discuss international activities of mutual interest
Learn about the other party's work
Learn about the party's institute's work
Learn about potential job opportunities
Expand my network
Other
10. Additional comments

Submit