Supporting Statement

Supporting Statement.doc

Revenue Procedure 2003-84, Optional Election to Make Monthly Sec. 706 Allocations

OMB: 1545-1768

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

(Revenue Procedure 2003-84)




  1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION


This revenue procedure allows certain partnerships that invest in tax-exempt obligations to make an election that enables the partners to take into account monthly the inclusions required under §§ 702 and 707(c) of the Internal Revenue Code and provides rules for partnership income tax reporting under § 6031 for such partnerships.


  1. USE OF DATA


The IRS will use the election statement as evidence that the taxpayer will close its books with respect to money market fund partners that consent to the election.


The IRS will use the consent statement as evidence that a partner consents to the election made by the partnership.

  1. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE BURDEN


IRS Publications, Regulations, Notices and Letters are to be electronically enabled on an as practicable basis in accordance with the IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998.


  1. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION


We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the agency wherever possible.


  1. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER SMALL ENTITIES


Not applicable.


  1. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES


Not applicable.


  1. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)


Not applicable.


  1. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS


Revenue Procedure 2002-16 was published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin on March 4, 2002, (2002-9 I.R.B.572). On October 28, 2002, Revenue Procedure 2002-68 (2002-43 I.R.B. 753), was published modifying and superseding Revenue Procedure 2002–16. On December 1, 2003, Revenue Procedure 2003-84 (2003-48 I.R.B. 1159), was published modifying and superseding Revenue Procedure 2002-68.


We received no comments during the comment period in response to the Federal Register notice (76 FR 32405), dated June 6, 2011.


  1. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE ANY PAYMENT OR GIFT TO RESPONDENTS


Not applicable.


  1. ASSURANCE OF CONFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES


Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.


  1. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSITIVE QUESTIONS


Not applicable.


  1. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION


The collection of information is in sections 5 and 6 of this revenue procedure. This information is required to inform the Service which partners and partnerships are making the designated election and to report income appropriately. The estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden is 500 hours. The estimated annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper is 1/2 hour. The estimated number of respondents and recordkeepers is 1,000.


Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.

  1. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS


As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice dated June 6, 2011, requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimates of capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any response from taxpayers on this subject. As a result, estimates of the cost burdens are not available at this time.


  1. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS FOR CHANGE IN BURDEN


There is no change in the paperwork burden previously approved by OMB. We are making this submission to renew the OMB approval.


  1. PLANS FOR TABULATION, STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND PUBLICATION


Not applicable.


  1. REASONS WHY DISPLAYING THE OMB EXPIRATION DATE IS INAPPROPRIATE


We believe that displaying the OMB expiration date is inappropriate because it could cause confusion by leading taxpayers to believe that the revenue procedure sunsets as of the expiration date. Taxpayers are not likely to be aware that the Service intends to request renewal of the OMB approval and obtain a new expiration date before the old one expires.


  1. EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT ON OMB FORM 83-I


Not applicable.


Note: The following paragraph applies to all of the collections of information in this submission:


An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103.



File Typeapplication/msword
AuthorTQ1FB
Last Modified Byqhrfb
File Modified2011-08-29
File Created2005-03-17

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy