1. CIRCUMSTANCES NECESSITATING COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
This form is an application from local law enforcement entities to the Treasury Department to request a percentage of proceeds or tangible property that has been seized/forfeited by the federal government.
2. USE OF DATA
The information on form TD F 92-22-46 is used to evaluate a request for asset sharing by a local, county, state or law enforcement agency that participated in a Treasury investigation.
3. USE OF IMPROVED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO REDUCE
The collection of information does not involve the use of automated, electronic, or other technological collection techniques.
4. EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY DUPLICATION
We have attempted to eliminate duplication within the Department wherever possible. We found no evidence that this data was being collected in another manner.
5. METHODS TO MINIMIZE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES OR OTHER
SMALL ENTITIES
We have requested information that will provide for the evaluation of the requestor's application for asset sharing.
6. CONSEQUENCES OF LESS FREQUENT COLLECTION ON FEDERAL
PROGRAMS OR POLICY ACTIVITIES
Delays would occur in the payment of asset sharing to those law enforcement entities entitled to it.
7. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRING DATA COLLECTION TO BE
INCONSISTENT WITH GUIDELINES IN CFR 1320.5(D)(2)
None applicable.
Supporting Statement
TD F 92-22-46
8. CONSULTATION WITH INDIVIDUALS OUTSIDE OF THE AGENCY ON
AVAILABILITY OF DATA, FREQUENCY OF COLLECTION, CLARITY OF
INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS, AND DATA ELEMENTS
We received no comments in response to the Federal Register notice dated June 22, 2011 (76 FR 36617). In addition, Treasury law enforcement personnel routinely meet with local, county, state and federal agency personnel in joint law enforcement situations and would have ample opportunity to advise this office if there were any concerns regarding the asset sharing application forms.
9. EXPLANATION OF DECISION TO PROVIDE PAYMENT OR GIFT TO
RESPONDENTS
Not applicable.
10. ASSURANCE OF COFIDENTIALITY OF RESPONSES
Reponses remain a part of the public record and may be made available under the Freedom of Information Act.
11. JUSTIFICATION OF SENSISTIVE QUESTIONS
Not applicable.
12. ESTIMATED BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
The burden is as follows:
Number of Responses Time per Responses Total Hours
5,000 30 Minutes 2,500
Estimates of the annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens shown are not available at this time.
Supporting Statement
TD F 92-22-46
13. ESTIMATED TOTAL ANNUAL COST BURDEN TO RESPONDENTS
As suggested by OMB, our Federal Register notice of June 22, 2011, requested public comments on estimates of cost burden that are not captured in the estimates of burden hours, i.e., estimated of capitol start-up costs and costs of operation maintenance, and purchase of services to provide information. However, we did not receive any responses from taxpayers or others on this subject. As a result, estimates of the costs burdens are not available at this time.
14. ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED COST TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
There is no direct cost to the federal government. However, the form is
utilized as part of the equitable sharing package.
15. EXPLAIN THE REASONS FOR ANY PROGRAM CHANGES OR
Formatting changes have been made to the form and a line to request an
e-mail address from the requesting agency has been added. This information collection is being submitted for extension purposes only. There is no change to the previously approved burden for this form.
16. PUBLICATION OF INFORMATION COLLECTION RESULTS
Not applicable.
17. APPROVAL TO NOT DISPLAY THE EXPIRATION DATE ON THIS FORM
We believe the public interest will be better served by not printing an expiration date on the form. Printing the expiration date on the form will result in increased costs because of the need to replace inventories that become obsolete by passage of the expiration date each time OMB approval is required. Without printing the expiration date, supplies of the form could continue to be used.
Not printing the expiration date on the form will also avoid confusion among users who may have identical forms with different expiration dates in their possession. For the above reasons, we request authorization to omit printing the expiration date on this form and permission to use previous versions of TD F 92-22.46.
18. EXPLAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
IDENTIFIED AT ITEM 19
Not applicable.
| File Type | application/msword |
| File Title | SUPPORTING STATEMENT |
| Author | jacksonj |
| Last Modified By | Reference |
| File Modified | 2011-09-26 |
| File Created | 2011-09-26 |