Justification rev.

Volume I NAEP 2013 Wave 1.doc

National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) 2011-13 System Clearance

Justification rev.

OMB: 1850-0790

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS (NCES)



NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF

EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS



WAVE 1 SUBMITTAL FOR 2013

VOLUME I

SUPPORTING STATEMENT


OMB# 18500790 v.34






Student Grade 4 Core + Reading Questions

Student Grade 4 Core + Mathematics Questions


Student Grade 8 Core + Reading Questions

Student Grade 8 Core + Mathematics Questions


Student Grade 12 Core Questions








March 15, 2012

Contents

1. Explanation for This Submittal

This document contains supplemental information pertaining to the 2011–2013 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) system clearance proposal. NAEP is administered by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) in the Institute for Education Sciences of the U.S. Department of Education. The National Assessment Governing Board (henceforth referred to as the Governing Board) sets policy for NAEP and determines the content framework for each assessment. The system clearance package was submitted in November 2009 and approved in April 2010 (OMB #1850-0790 v.26). The terms of clearance for OMB approvals state that each subsequent submittal activity under the system clearance is to be submitted to OMB with a 60-day Federal Register notice waiver.

This Wave 1 submittal contains burden information and the background questions (also referred to as noncognitive questions) for the following components of the 2013 NAEP assessments:

Grade 4

Student Grade 4 Core1 + Reading Questions

Student Grade 4 Core + Mathematics Questions

Grade 8

Student Grade 8 Core + Reading Questions

Student Grade 8 Core + Mathematics Questions

Grade 12

Student Grade 12 Core Questions

These specific questions are the initial group (Wave 1) of questions submitted for approval for usage in 2013. The grades 4 and 8 core, reading, and mathematics background questions in Wave 1 will be used in over 80 percent of the 2013 main NAEP student assessments. A second (and possibly third) group of questions (Waves 2 and 3) will be submitted as part of the overall 2013 OMB submission. These waves will contain the remainder of the student, teacher, and school survey questions associated with the 2013 assessments. Wave 2 will also include the students with disabilities (SD) and English language learner (ELL) worksheets that will be administered as part of 2013 main NAEP assessments.

The nature of NAEP is that burden alternates from a relatively low burden in national-level administration years to a substantial burden increase in state-level administration years that include one or more assessments that support the reporting of results by state and certain urban districts. In 2013, NAEP will conduct national-level, state, and district-level assessments, so the estimated burden is much higher than in 2012 NAEP.

2. Overview of Wave 1 NAEP 2013 Assessments

Much of the following broad overview of the 2013 NAEP assessments was included as part of the 2011–2013 system clearance submittal. The Governing Board determines NAEP policy and assessment schedule, and future Governing Board decisions may result in changes to some aspects of an assessment (e.g., which subjects are assessed in which years). However, the overall methodology and assessment process remains consistent. The national NAEP assessments contain two kinds of questions: cognitive or assessment questions that measure student knowledge of an academic subject, and background or survey questions that gather information on demographic as well as classroom instructional procedures. The Governing Board is responsible for selecting and approving all of NAEP’s background questions, as well as the cognitive items.

These NAEP assessments are currently supported by an alliance of organizations under contract with NCES, U.S. Department of Education. The main NAEP assessment reports current achievement levels and trends in student achievement at grades 4, 8, and 12 for the nation and, for certain assessments, states and select urban districts. These assessments follow subject-area frameworks developed by the Governing Board and use the latest advances in assessment methodology. The subject-area frameworks evolve to match instructional practices.

3. Information Pertaining to the 2013 Questionnaires in This Submittal

Student Questionnaires

For this submittal, the 2013 core sections are comprised of existing trend questions and questions that were previously piloted. The grades 4 and 8 operational reading and mathematics subject-specific questions are existing trend questions. The grade 12 subject-specific questions (in both reading and mathematics) are not yet complete and will be part of the Wave 2 submittal.

Committees that helped define the cognitive and background questions pertaining to the Wave 1 subjects are listed in appendix A.

4. 2013 Wave 1 Burden Information

The total combined burden for the Wave 1 materials is as follows:

Table 1: Total Burden for Wave 1

Respondent Category

Number of Respondents

Total Burden Hours

Student

772,600

180,850

School pre-assessment visit and E-filing

16,750

41,038

Total

789,350

221,888


The per respondent and overall burden times are included in tables 2 and 3 and include the following categories:

Students - Students in fourth, eighth, and twelfth grades complete assessment booklets that commonly contain two 25-minute cognitive blocks; these are followed by two background question sections that require a total of 15 minutes to complete.

The first background question block contains core questions, many of which are related to demographic information. The second background block contains subject-specific questions. For grade 12, this submittal contains only the core questions; the grade 12 reading and mathematics background questions will be part of Wave 2. Thus, only 5 minutes of burden time is included for the grade 12 students here.

Appendix B includes a sample parental notification letter regarding NAEP. The letter will be adapted for each grade/subject combination and the school principal may edit it. However, the information regarding confidentiality and the appropriate law reference will remain unchanged.

Schools: E-filing – Survey sample information is collected from schools in the form of lists of potential students who may participate in NAEP. This sample information can be gathered manually or electronically (e-filing) at the school, district, or state level. If done at the school or district level, some burden will be incurred by school or district personnel and the e-filing burden is estimated at one hour per school. For 2011, the most recent large assessment year for NAEP, approximately 45 percent of schools and districts employed the e-filing process. Thus, we used 45 percent of total schools for e-filing burden calculation purposes.

Schools: Pre-Assessment Activities – Prior to the assessment, school personnel must prepare for the assessment. Part of the preparation is the pre-assessment visit, which is the opportunity for the NCES contractor field staff to meet with the school personnel to review procedures and logistics for the upcoming assessment. In addition, miscellaneous activities related to information gathering for the pre-assessment visit and communication with the teachers and students are required. Both the pre-assessment visit and the miscellaneous activities are estimated to require one hour each of school personnel time. Thus, the total burden time for pre-assessment related activities is two hours. A sample brochure communication from the NAEP state coordinators to the participating schools describing these activities is included as appendix C. This brochure outlines what the school coordinator will be responsible for, including a description of e-filing and the pre-assessment visit.  The information in the brochure will be updated for the 2013 assessment year and modified for each appropriate grade, subject area, mode of assessment, and timeline combination.

Burden Change – The nature of NAEP is that burden alternates from a relatively low burden in national-level only administration years to a substantial burden increase in state-level administration years that include one or more assessments that support state-by-state and certain urban districts reporting. In state/district assessment years, NAEP samples approximate 1,000,000 students, while in national-only assessment years, NAEP samples approximate 100,000 students. Also, the clearance for NAEP collections is usually split into two to three submissions, Wave 1, Wave 2, and sometimes Wave 3. This is the first of the NAEP 2013 submissions, Wave 1, which presents a portion of all of materials and burden hours estimated for NAEP 2013. Wave 2, and potentially Wave 3, will present the remaining NAEP 2013 materials and burden.

Table 2: Wave 1 Questionnaires - Per Respondent Burden Time

Respondent Category

Time per Respondent

Grade 4

Student Core + Reading

15 minutes

Student Core + Mathematics

15 minutes

Grade 8

Student Core + Reading

15 minutes

Student Core + Mathematics

15 minutes

Grade 12

Student Core

5 minutes



Table 3: Estimated Burden for NAEP 2013 Questionnaires Contained in This Submittal (Wave 1)

5. How, by Whom, and for What Purpose the Data Will Be Used

The purpose of NAEP is to collect and report assessment data on student achievement in the subject areas assessed for use in monitoring education progress. In addition to reporting overall results of student performance and achievement, NAEP also reports student performance results for various subgroups of students and on various educational factors. Guidance for what is asked in the questions is set by the Governing Board. NCES is responsible for developing the questions and for selecting the final set of questions. The questions are designed to (a) provide the information for disaggregating data according to categories specified in the legislation,2 (b) provide contextual information that is subject specific (e.g. reading, mathematics) and has an impact and known relationship to student achievement, and (c) provide policy-relevant information specified by the Governing Board.

In the original request to OMB for system clearance, NCES requested approval of the data-gathering instruments to be used in the 2011–2013 national and state assessments. An expanded description of the purposes of the data is provided in the system clearance submittal.

6. Estimates of Costs to the Federal Government

Table 4 provides estimates for the Wave 1 portion of the 2013 administrations.

Table 4: Administration Cost Estimates

Activity

Provider

Estimated Costs

Printing, packaging, and distribution phases of the administration including:

  • prepare and package the assessment and all auxiliary materials

  • distribute assessment booklets and materials to the test administrators for each school

Pearson (the Materials, Distribution, Processing and Scoring (MDPS) contractor)

$8.5 million

Field administration including:

  • administration of assessments

  • pre-assessment contact/visits to school

  • data collection from the field

Westat (the Data Collection contractor and NAEP State Service Center (NSSC) contractor)

$17 million

Totals


$25.5 million

Appendix A: Committee Lists

NAEP Background Variable Committee

Name Affiliation

Patricia Alexander University of Maryland

Arthur Applebee State University of New York at Albany

Claudia Buchman Ohio State University

Lizanne Destefano University of Illinois

Robert Hauser University of Wisconsin-Madison

Kathleen Heid Penn State University

Henry Levin Columbia University

Peter Levine Tufts University

Linda Levstik University of Kentucky

Samuel Lucas University of California-Berkeley

Senta Raizen West-Ed,

Washington, DC

Andrew Sum Northeastern University

William Walstad University of Nebraska-Lincoln

NAEP Mathematics Committee

Name Affiliation

Sareeta Carter Benjamin Banneker Academic High School,

Washington, DC

Herb Clemens Ohio State University

Marcia Cole District of Columbia Public Schools,

Washington, DC 

Carl Cowen Indiana University-Purdue University,

Indianapolis, IN

Bradford R. Findell Ohio Department of Education

Diana Rivera Garcia Departamento de Educación Puerto Rico

Anne Gonzales South Gate Middle School,

South Gate, CA

Julie Guthrie Texas Education Agency,

Austin, TX

Kathleen Heid Penn State University

Russ Keglovitis Nevada Department of Education,

Carson City, NV

Judy Kinley Morris Elementary School,

Des Moines, IA

Carole Phillip Alice Deal Middle School,

Washington, DC

Penny Roberts Greenville Elementary School,

Greenville, KY

Daren Starnes The Lawrenceville School,

Lawrenceville, NJ

JT Sutcliffe St. Mark’s School of Texas,

Dallas, TX

NAEP Reading Committee

Name Affiliation

Peter Afflerbach University of Maryland

Patricia Alexander University of Maryland

Christine Carriere Carl Von Linne School,

Chicago, IL

Mary Beth Curtis Lesley University,

Cambridge, MA

Patsy Dunton Maine Department of Education

Arzie Galvez Office of Curriculum, Instruction and School Support,

Los Angeles, CA.

Pamela Mason Harvard Graduate School of Education

Joe McGonegal Catholic Memorial High School,

West Roxbury, MA

Margaret McKeown University of Pittsburgh

Katie Oliver Morgan Park Middle School,

Duluth, MN

Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois

Alfred Tatum University of Illinois at Chicago

Lisa White Plymouth Public Schools,

Plymouth, MA

Junko Yokota National-Louis University,

Skokie, IL

Appendix B: Parent/Guardian Notification Letter


NAEP (NAEP Assessment Year) PARENT/GUARDIAN NOTIFICATION LETTER


(School Letterhead)

(Insert Date Here)


Dear Parent or Guardian:


We are pleased to tell you that (school name) has been selected to represent schools across our state and the nation by participating in the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). NAEP is given by the National Center for Education Statistics within the U.S. Department of Education and tells us what our nation’s students know and can do in key subject areas. It is the largest continuing and nationally representative assessment and has been providing valid and reliable data on student performance since 1969.


The results of NAEP are published in a report called The Nation's Report Card, which provides information about student achievement to educators, parents, policymakers, and the public.


In our school, the NAEP assessment will be given on (date) in (subject). Your child (may be/has been) selected to take the assessment. In addition to subject area questions, students will be asked some questions about themselves and their educational experience. You can access student and sample assessment questions at http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/parents/.


It will take about (assessment time) minutes for most students to complete NAEP. The results are completely confidential (in accordance with the Confidential Information Protection provisions of Title V, Subtitle A, Public Law 107-347), and the information provided will be used for statistical purposes only. Your child’s grades will not be affected. Your child may be excused from participation for any reason, is not required to finish the assessment, and may skip any test question. While NAEP is voluntary, we depend on student participation to provide an accurate measure of student achievement that will inform improvements in education. Your child will represent many other students, so participation is very important. However, if you do not want your child to participate, please notify me in writing by (date).


There is no need to study in preparation for NAEP. We do ask parents to encourage their children to do their best and to have them get plenty of rest the night before the assessment.


If you would like to have additional information about NAEP, please visit http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard. If you have questions or would like to review a booklet that includes sample subject area and student questions, please contact me at (telephone number) or via e-mail at (e-mail address).


We are excited that our school will be participating in NAEP, and we are pleased that your child (may be/has been) selected. We know that (school name)'s students will help us show what (state name)’s students know and can do.


Sincerely,


School Principal

Appendix C: Sample Description of School Coordinator Responsibilities


NAEP (NAEP Assessment Year) School Coordinator Responsibilities




As the school coordinator, you are the liaison for all NAEP assessment activities in your school.


In the fall, you will be responsible for:


Registering for the MySchool website.

MySchool is used to collect information about your school and provide you with documents that you can download and customize throughout the NAEP assessment process. Multiple school staff may register to access the site. To register for MySchool, go to www.mynaep.com and complete the form using the registration ID provided by your NAEP State or Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) Coordinator.


Completing and submitting school information.

Click on “Provide School Information” on MySchool to enter and submit information about your school so that materials can be prepared for the assessment.


If requested, providing the NAEP State or TUDA Coordinator with a list of <selected> grade students.

NAEP requires a complete list of students in the selected grade in order to select a random sample of students to participate in the assessment. This list provides demographic information about students who will be assessed. It is usually submitted electronically and may be prepared by the school, district, or state. Your NAEP State or TUDA Coordinator will inform you if you need to provide this list. Student names will always be kept confidential and individual student responses or scores are never reported.


Before the assessment date, you will be responsible for:


Preparing for the assessment.

Numerous activities need to be completed early in January to ensure a successful assessment.

  • Identify teachers who teach the assessed subjects to your <selected>-grade students.

  • Arrange logistics for the assessment.

  • Review the instructions for distributing and completing the worksheets for students identified as English language learners and/or students with disabilities, and distribute them to the staff person(s) most knowledgeable about how these students are tested on your state assessment.


Informing parents/guardians.

By law, parents/guardians of children selected to participate in NAEP must be informed prior to administration of the assessment that their child has been selected for the assessment, may be excused from participation for any reason, is not required to finish the assessment, and is not required to answer all test questions. Your NAEP State or TUDA Coordinator will provide a Sample Parent/Guardian Notification Letter and additional information about how this requirement should be fulfilled. These details, as well as electronic copies of the letter, will be provided through MySchool. Parent notification should be completed prior to the pre-assessment visit. Parents may also visit http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/parents/ to find out more about NAEP.


Meeting with the NAEP staff during the scheduled pre-assessment visit.

In late January, you will meet with the NAEP representative to go over information related to the NAEP administration. During the meeting, you will review the list of selected students to verify that their demographic information is accurate and complete. Details for the assessment day will be finalized, such as which students will require accommodations, how NAEP will be administered, the time and locations of the assessment, and how students and teachers will be notified. The NAEP representative will also verify that parents have been notified and will collect a copy of the parent notification letter during this visit.


Promoting the importance of NAEP with school staff.

Teachers are essential for motivating students to do their best on NAEP. The following are some suggestions on how to gain teacher support:


Promoting the importance of NAEP with students.

Students who are selected for NAEP will represent students across the nation, so it is vital that these <selected grade>-graders participate and do their best. The following are some suggestions on how to encourage students to do their best:

  • Speak with participating students prior to assessment day. Let them know why NAEP is important.

  • Consider ways to thank students for their participation.

  • Inform students that they can find past NAEP results by visiting The Nation’s Report Card website, http://nationsreportcard.gov/.

  • Inform students that individual results are not released to the public and that NAEP only takes 90–120 minutes to complete.


On the assessment date, you will be responsible for:


Ensuring that students attend the session.

Prior to the assessment start time, you will need to be available to ensure that students attend. You are encouraged to remain in the room during the assessment. NAEP staff will bring all assessment materials to the school and will conduct the session(s). It is very important that attendance rates be as high as possible to avoid the need for makeup sessions. If attendance of sampled students is less than 90 percent, a makeup session will be needed, and the NAEP representative will schedule another date to administer the assessment to the students who were absent.


Thank you in advance for your help preparing for this important assessment!




1 NCES collects student question data that are required by law (20 U.S.C. § 9622; i.e., race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status) and provide a context for reporting student performance. These questions are referred to as core questions.

2 Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 (ESRA), National Assessment of Educational Progress (20 USC § 9622).

2013 Wave 1 Supporting Statement 2

File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleNATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF
Authorjoconnell
Last Modified Bykashka.kubzdela
File Modified2012-04-30
File Created2012-03-15

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy