ATTACHMENT B – 2010 Renewal
Voluntary Questions Added to the Data Collection Over Time:
These were approved at the initial implementation of the project- 2001.
Respondents will be asked not only to report deaths and serious injuries to FDA (as they are required to do under the statute), but will also be asked to voluntarily report if an event resulted in minor injury to the patient or if an event had the potential for patient harm (including “close-call”) events.
Rationale: Both facilities and FDA wish to become more proactive in improving patient safety. If reports are only received after someone has been seriously injured or has died as a result of a medical-device-related event, it is too late to help the injured person. By obtaining information that a potential hazard exists before a serious consequence has occurred, FDA will be able to alert the health care community as to potential problems so that patient safety may be promoted. User facilities will be able to view redacted “potential for harm” events that have been reported into the system in the newsletter that is provided to them. The facilities will be able to learn from the reported events, and can take steps to avoid similar problems in their own facilities.
If the facility checks that the event took place in the hospital, they are then asked to fill in this voluntary question: “Area in the hospital where the event took place” (they are given choices).
In D4 on the 3500A it asks for the operator of the device, then gives choices of (health professional) (lay user/patient) (other). This is not very helpful to FDA in deciding what “type” of person had trouble with the device, so we asked for more detail in this voluntary question: “Who was operating the device: (doctor) (allied health professional) (patient) (nurse) (family member/visitor) (other)”
These questions were approved in 2001, but have been discontinued because the sites either were not routinely answering them, were confused by them, or the answers were found, over time, not to be helpful to FDA.
What time of day did the event occur?
Has the facility discontinued use of the device due to the adverse event? (this is a yes or no response).
Check all of the factors you think may have contributed to the event:
○ Inadequate systems
○ Poor device design
○ Poor device maintenance
○ Inadequate equipment
○ Unfamiliarity with device
○ Training
○ Unfamiliar environment (clinician)
○ Other: ______________________
Check all of the factors you think could prevent future occurrences of this type of event:
○ New or improved devices
○ Additional equipment: ___________
○ Better device maintenance
○ Appropriate training
○ Other: _________________
These were approved in 2004 by Memo
Additional questions about in-vitro diagnostic products added to the MedSun form:
Did the problem involve (check all that apply):
1. The reagent?
2. The instrument?
3. Single use test?
4. Something else? (specify)
Is this a recurrent problem with this assay, test kit, or instrument?
1. Yes
2. No
Additional comments
Which of the following problems did you observe? (Check all that apply and include additional comments as needed)
1. Calibration
2. Repeated error message
3. Reproducibility
4. Analytical sensitivity
5. Analytical specificity
6. Quality control
7. Questionable patient results
8. Reagent(s)
9. Inadequate/unclear
instructions
for use
10. Poor test/instrument design
11. Performance
described in package
insert not met
12. Specimen problems
13. Patient related problems
14. Other (specify)
Product not available to return to manufacturer
9. Discontinued all use of product
10. Not known
11. Not applicable
12. Other (specify):
Additional Comments: ________________
Please describe any follow-up actions below (check all that apply and include additional comments as needed):
1. Repeated
assay, results OK,
reported out
2. Repeated assay, still problems
3. Replaced reagents
4. Opened new lot
5. Manufacturer notified
6. Called for service
7. Product returned to manufacturer
(Date of return: ___/___/____)
Additional Comments
8. Product not available to return to manufacturer
9. Discontinued all use of product
10. Not known
11. Not applicable
12. Other (specify):
Additional Comments:
These were approved in 2006, by Memo
These questions were added to gain more information about tissue and cell products
1. Transplant Product Distinct Identification Code (or other identifiers) ____________________________
No problem was detected with the product.
Product damage, describe________________________
Packaging problem, describe________________________
Product contamination, describe________________________
Labeling problem, describe________________________
Product Irregularity, describe________________________
Other___________________________________________
3. Was the human cell or tissue manipulated following removal from the packaging prior to transplantation?
Yes. Please describe (e.g., stretched, rinsed in saline):
___________________________________________________
No (SKIP TO 4)
Unknown (SKIP TO 4)
4. Was a pre-transplant gram stain of the tissue performed?
Yes, pre-transplant gram stain was performed.
No, pre-transplant gram stain was not performed. (SKIP TO 5)
Do not know (SKIP TO 5 )
Other (Specify) ______________________________________
4a. The gram stain result was:
Negative for organisms
Positive for organisms: RESULT_______________________
Unknown
Other (Specify) ______________________________________
5. Was a pre-implant culture performed?
Yes, pre-implant culture was performed
No, pre-implant culture was not performed (SKIP to 6)
Unknown (SKIP to 6)
Other (Specify) ______________________________________
5a. The culture showed:
No growth of organisms
Positive growth of organism(s). Identification of organism: ___________________________________________________
Unknown
Other (Specify) ______________________________________
Not known (Skip to 8)
Other (Specify) ______________________________________________
7. Date of Transplant/Infusion _____/____/_____
mm/ dd/ yyyy
8. Were any devices transplanted with the tissue?
Yes (Please provide information in the DEVICE section of the MedSun database)
No
Unknown
Was there a post-transplant adverse event or close call?
Yes, adverse event
Yes, potential adverse event (or close call)
No (Please skip to end to record any additional comments.)
( Check here if there was not an infection-related adverse event and skip to 11.)
Anatomic Site____________________ Date___/____/_______
Results________________________ mm/ dd/ yyyy
Anatomic Site ____________________ Date___/____/_______
Results________________________ mm/ dd/ yyyy
Anatomic Site ____________________ Date___/____/_______
Results________________________ mm/ dd/ yyyy
10b. Other Study Results:
Test ______________ Date___/____/_______ Results________________________
mm/ dd/ yyyy
Test ______________ Date____/____/______ Results________________________
mm/ dd/ yyyy
Test ______________ Date____/____/______ Results________________________
mm/ dd/ yyyy
( Check here if this does not apply. Proceed to 12.)
Allograft malfunction: Describe________________________
Allograft rejection: Describe________________________
Other__________________________________
No intervention
Antibiotics for prophylaxis
Antibiotics for treatment
Required hospitalization
Required prolonged hospitalization for patient already hospitalized
Required additional procedure:
Specify Procedure_______________________
Date Performed: ________________
Required explantation (Specify Date)___/___/____
Required retransplantation (Specify Date)___/___/____
Unknown
Other (Specify) ___________________________________________________
Any Additional Comments:
______________________________________________________________________
Profile Information asked of hospitals
Is facility teaching hospital?
Bed size: up to 100 100-300 300-500 500+
Region of country
Acute or tertiary
File Type | application/msword |
File Title | ATTACMENT B |
Author | marilyn neder flack |
Last Modified By | jcapezzu |
File Modified | 2011-03-24 |
File Created | 2011-03-24 |