0920-0879 AttachmentJ - Questionnaire WORD version

Surveys of State, Tribal, Local and Territorial (STLT) Governmental Health Agencies

AttachmentJ - Questionnaire WORD version 10312012

Assessment of Characteristics of State Crash Outcome Data Evaluation Systems

OMB: 0920-0879

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

Attachment J- State Questionnaire WORD version

Characteristics of a State Linkage System




Form approved

OMB No. 0920-0879

Expiration Date: 03/31/2014


1. What is today’s date?

Shape3 Shape2 Shape1 MM DD YYYY

/ /

Please enter today’s date using the

following format.



2. Which state are you representing in completing this survey?

Shape4




3. In case we have any questions or need clarification on responses, please provide your email address. Email addresses will not be linked to any data outputs.

Shape5



4. How much of a priority would you say motor vehicle injury is in your state compared with other health problems?


Shape6

Highest priority

Shape7

Priority

Shape9 Shape8

Somewhat of a priority


Not a priority at all


  1. What year did your state start its linkage project?

Shape10





  1. Is the linkage and analysis project in your state for which you are responding part of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Crash Outcome Data Evaluation System (CODES)?


Shape11

Yes

Shape12

No


  1. Which agency is responsible for… State Department State Department of Other

Shape13

Of Public Health Transportation/Highways

Shape15 Shape14

The coordination of your overall linkage/CODES project?

Shape18 Shape17 Shape16


Shape19

Your primary linkage/CODES project linkage?

Shape21 Shape20


Your primary linkage/CODES project data analysis?


If you indicated “Other”, please specify the agency name(s) below:

Shape22





  1. If your state participates in the NHTSA CODES effort, in what year was the program begun?


Shape23













Public reporting burden of this collection of information is estimated to average 40 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to CDC/ATSDR Reports Clearance Officer; 1600 Clifton Road NE, MS D-74, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; ATTN: PRA (0920-0879)









  1. Indicate the years of source data that are suitable for linking that you have available.



Crash

Inpatient Hospital

E.D.

Emergency Medical Services (E.M.S.)

Drivers License

Traffic Violation/ Citation

Vehicle Registration

2002

Shape24

Shape25

Shape26

Shape27

Shape28

Shape29

Shape30

2003

Shape31

Shape32

Shape33

Shape34

Shape35

Shape36

Shape37

2004

Shape38

Shape39

Shape40

Shape41

Shape42

Shape43

Shape44

2005

Shape45

Shape46

Shape47

Shape48

Shape49

Shape50

Shape51

2006

Shape52

Shape53

Shape54

Shape55

Shape56

Shape57

Shape58

2007

Shape59

Shape60

Shape61

Shape62

Shape63

Shape64

Shape65

2008

Shape66

Shape67

Shape68

Shape69

Shape70

Shape71

Shape72

2009

Shape73

Shape74

Shape75

Shape76

Shape77

Shape78

Shape79

2010

Shape80

Shape81

Shape82

Shape83

Shape84

Shape85

Shape86

2011

Shape87

Shape88

Shape89

Shape90

Shape91

Shape92

Shape93


If you have “other” data sources available, indicate the name and year(s) of data available below:



Shape94



  1. For which of the following years and databases have you linked your CRASH data:


Inpatient

E.D.

Emergency Medical Services (E.M.S.)

Drivers License

Traffic Violation/ Citation

Vehicle Registration

Other



2002

Shape95

Shape96

Shape97

Shape98

Shape99

Shape100

Shape101



2003

Shape102

Shape103

Shape104

Shape105

Shape106

Shape107

Shape108



2004

Shape109

Shape110

Shape111

Shape112

Shape113

Shape114

Shape115



2005

Shape116

Shape117

Shape118

Shape119

Shape120

Shape121

Shape122



2006

Shape123

Shape124

Shape125

Shape126

Shape127

Shape128

Shape129



2007

Shape130

Shape131

Shape132

Shape133

Shape134

Shape135

Shape136



2008

Shape137

Shape138

Shape139

Shape140

Shape141

Shape142

Shape143



2009

Shape144

Shape145

Shape146

Shape147

Shape148

Shape149

Shape150



2010

Shape151

Shape152

Shape153

Shape154

Shape155

Shape156

Shape157



2011

Shape158

Shape159

Shape160

Shape161

Shape162

Shape163

Shape164




If your state has “Other” data sets linked (i.e. E.M.S> data linked to trauma data), indicate the name and years of data sets that are linked.


Shape165




  1. Consider the following:


Yes

No

  1. Do you have a Board of Advisors or Directors for your linkage/CODES project?

Shape166

Shape167

  1. Do you have a small group or subcommittee that assists as a steering committee, work group, task force, or other advisory board that assists you with identifying your linkage/research priorities?

Shape168

Shape169


Other comments:


Shape170











  1. Consider the following in relation to your linkage/CODES project:



Annually

Bi-annually

Quarterly

Monthly

Other time period, please specify below

  1. If your state has a Board of Advisors or Directors, how often does that group meet?


Shape171

Shape172

Shape173

Shape174

Shape175

  1. If your state has a small group or subcommittee that assists as a steering committee, work group, task force, or advisory board that identifies linkage/research priorities, how often does that group meet?

Shape176

Shape177

Shape178

Shape179

Shape180


Please specify other time periods for each if option not provided.

Shape181





  1. Indicate the organizations that are represented on your linkage/CODES Board of Advisors or Directors.



Members

State Highway Safety Office

Shape182

State Department of Motor Vehicles

Shape183

State Department of Public Safety

Shape184

State Department of Transportation/Highways

Shape185

State Police

Shape186

State Trauma Board

Shape187

State level hospital association

Shape188

University/College: Specify name(s) below

Shape189

Other state department, non-governmental organization, or other: specify name(s) below

Shape190


If you listed University/College or other state department, non-governmental organization, or some other potential agency, please specify those agency name(s):

Shape191





  1. If your state has a small group or subcommittee that assists as a steering committee, work group, task force, or advisory board, that identifies linking/research priorities, list those agencies that participate in this with you. If this doesn’t apply, please indicate with N/A:


Shape192






  1. Indicate the funding streams that your state utilizes to support your linkage/CODES project



Funding available to our state

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

Shape193

NHTSA

Shape194

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Shape195

State Highway Safety Office

Shape196

State Department of Public Health

Shape197

State Department of Transportation/Highways

Shape198

State Department of Motor Vehicles

Shape199

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)

Shape200

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)

Shape201

Other

Shape202




If you selected “other” indicate who those partners include:


Shape203




  1. Do you charge other agencies for data outputs from your linkage/CODES project?

Shape204



Shape205 Yes


No

I

If you indicated “yes”, please share how you might charge other agencies (i.e. hourly, price by size of project or output, etc.)

Shape206




  1. Indicate your agency’s level of involvement with each of the following in your state: (i.e. involvement might mean that you attend meetings that they hold or they attend meetings that you hold – you mutually support those program efforts or they support yours).



We interact frequently

We interact occasionally

We rarely interact

We never interact

Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC)

Shape207

Shape208

Shape209

Shape210

Department of Public Health – Injury Surveillance

Shape211

Shape212

Shape213

Shape214

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)

Shape215

Shape216

Shape217

Shape218

NHTSA Regional Office

Shape219

Shape220

Shape221

Shape222

State Core Violence and Injury Prevention Program (Core VIPP)

Shape223

Shape224

Shape225

Shape226

Other

Shape227

Shape228

Shape229

Shape230


If you selected “other” indicate who the other partners are that you interact with and your level of involvement with them


Shape231







  1. Indicate how often you share or provide linked/CODES data to each of the following: (meaning that you have an ongoing relationship and commitment to provide them with data outputs or analyses).


Frequently

Occasionally

Rarely

Never

Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC)

Shape232

Shape233

Shape234

Shape235

Department of Public Health – Injury Surveillance

Shape236

Shape237

Shape238

Shape239

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)

Shape240

Shape241

Shape242

Shape243

NHTSA Regional Office

Shape244

Shape245

Shape246

Shape247

State Core Violence and Injury Prevention Program (Core VIPP)

Shape248

Shape249

Shape250

Shape251

Other

Shape252

Shape253

Shape254

Shape255


If you indicated “Other”, please specify the agency name(s) and the frequency with which you interact.


Shape256




















  1. Indicate how often you get data requests from the following:




Frequently

Occasionally

Rarely

Never

Traffic Records Coordinating Committee (TRCC)

Shape257

Shape258

Shape259

Shape260

Department of Public Health – Injury Surveillance

Shape261

Shape262

Shape263

Shape264

Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)

Shape265

Shape266

Shape267

Shape268

NHTSA Regional Office

Shape269

Shape270

Shape271

Shape272

State Core Violence and Injury Prevention Program (Core VIPP)

Shape273

Shape274

Shape275

Shape276

Other

Shape277

Shape278

Shape279

Shape280


If you indicated “Other”, please specify the agency name(s) that submit data requests and the frequency with which they request data from you.


Shape281








  1. How would you rate the demand for linkage/CODES data in your state?



Many people use our data on an on-going basis

We receive data requests several times per year

We receive data requests occasionally

We rarely receive data requests

We never receive data requests

  1. For use in identifying traffic safety problems

Shape282

Shape283

Shape284

Shape285

Shape286

  1. For use in supporting traffic safety decision makers

Shape287

Shape288

Shape289

Shape290

Shape291

  1. For use in educating the public

Shape292

Shape293

Shape294

Shape295

Shape296

  1. For use in legislative decision making

Shape297

Shape298

Shape299

Shape300

Shape301



  1. For each employee working on your linkage/CODES project, indicate the amount of time that they spend working on the project over the course of a year. (working on the project meaning: preparing a data feed for linkage, participating in meetings regarding linkage/analysis, preparing data regarding linkage/analysis, writing papers or preparing presentation materials on the results of analyses, etc..).



Percent FTE

Percent Effort

Familiarity with Statistics/Epidemiology

Person #1

Shape302


Shape303


Shape304 Bachelor’s


Shape305 Masters


Shape306 PhD

Shape307 No degree but have taken courses (i.e. statistics, epidemiology, etc.)


Shape308 No degree, no courses

Person #2

Shape309


Shape310


Shape311 Bachelor’s


Shape312 Masters

Shape313 PhD

Shape314 No degree but have taken courses (i.e. statistics, epidemiology, etc.)


Shape315 No degree, no courses

Person #3

Shape316


Shape317


Shape318 Bachelor’s


Shape319 Masters

Shape320 PhD

Shape321 No degree but have taken courses (i.e. statistics, epidemiology, etc.)


Shape322 No degree, no courses

Person #4

Shape323


Shape324


Shape325 Bachelor’s


Shape326 Masters

Shape327 PhD

Shape328 No degree but have taken courses (i.e. statistics, epidemiology, etc.)


Shape329 No degree, no courses

Person #5

Shape330


Shape331


Shape332 Bachelor’s


Shape333 Masters

Shape334 PhD

Shape335 No degree but have taken courses (i.e. statistics, epidemiology, etc.)


Shape336 No degree, no courses

Person #6

Shape337


Shape338


Shape339 Bachelor’s


Shape340 Masters

Shape341 PhD

Shape342 No degree but have taken courses (i.e. statistics, epidemiology, etc.)


Shape343 No degree, no courses







If more than 6 people are employed with your linkage/CODES project, continue your list here.


Shape344





  1. If your state is NOT part of the CODES effort what linkage method do you use?

Shape345


Probalistic

Shape346


Deterministic


Please describe linkage method or any software used:



  1. How would you describe your project staff’s proficiency in the following (proficiency meaning statistical background, knowledge of appropriate software, understanding of outputs, and ability to draw conclusions):




Linkage (pick one for each software)

Analysis (pick one for each software)

LinkSolv

Our state doesn’t use this software for linkage

Our state doesn’t use this software for analysis

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Not proficient at all

Not proficient at all

CODES2000

Our state doesn’t use this software for linkage

Our state doesn’t use this software for analysis

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Not proficient at all

Not proficient at all

IVEWare

Our state doesn’t use this software for linkage

Our state doesn’t use this software for analysis

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Not proficient at all

Not proficient at all

SAS

Our state doesn’t use this software for linkage

Our state doesn’t use this software for analysis

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Not proficient at all

Not proficient at all

Microsoft Access

Our state doesn’t use this software for linkage

Our state doesn’t use this software for analysis

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Not proficient at all

Not proficient at all

Microsoft Excel

Our state doesn’t use this software for linkage

Our state doesn’t use this software for analysis

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Expert: Assists or able to teach others in using software

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Intermediate: can generally develop linkage specifications /program or run software without assistance

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Beginner: Needs assistance in developing linkage specifications/programs or running of software

Not proficient at all

Not proficient at all



If you selected “Other software in general”, please specify what your linkage/CODES project uses and their proficiency in using. Identify as expert, intermediate, beginner, not proficient.












  1. For each of the following indicate the areas in which your staff has received technical assistance or training:



Yes

No

Understanding the structure and content of crash data


Shape347

Shape348

Linkage: using Linksolv

Shape349

Shape350

Linkage: using CODES2000

Shape351

Shape352

Linkage: using other linkage software (Specify)

Shape353

Shape354

Creating clean usable data sets for analysis: using linkage results

Shape355

Shape356

Missing data imputation

Shape357

Shape358

Analyzing linked, imputed data

Shape359

Shape360


If you indicated that your linkage/CODES project uses some “Other” linkage software, specify the name of that software package.

Shape361




  1. If you had the opportunity for additional technical assistance/training, what topics would your linkage/CODES project find important or relevant?

Shape362





  1. Estimate the lag time in months that it takes to receive data from your state data partners:



Our state doesn’t use this data source

1-3 months

4-6 months

7-9 months

10-12 months

13-18 months

19-24 months

More than 24 months

Crash

Shape363

Shape364

Shape365

Shape366

Shape367

Shape368

Shape369

Shape370

Inpatient Hospital

Shape371

Shape372

Shape373

Shape374

Shape375

Shape376

Shape377

Shape378

E.D.

Shape379

Shape380

Shape381

Shape382

Shape383

Shape384

Shape385

Shape386

E.M.S.

Shape387

Shape388

Shape389

Shape390

Shape391

Shape392

Shape393

Shape394

Drivers License

Shape395

Shape396

Shape397

Shape398

Shape399

Shape400

Shape401

Shape402

Traffic Violation/ Citation

Shape403

Shape404

Shape405

Shape406

Shape407

Shape408

Shape409

Shape410

Vehicle Registration

Shape411

Shape412

Shape413

Shape414

Shape415

Shape416

Shape417

Shape418


If your state links data sets other than those listed, specify what data sets that includes and the lag time in months it takes to receive that data.

Shape419





  1. The next several questions refer to aspects of your linkage/CODES project that may serve as resources or barriers. Please indicate the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements. Our linkage/CODES project has…



Strongly agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly disagree

Neither agree nor disagree

  1. Adequate financial resources to participate in data linkage and analysis efforts

Shape420

Shape421

Shape422

Shape423

Shape424

  1. Had at least 1 position in which the job description included work related to planning, implementing, and/or evaluating data linkage and analysis efforts

Shape425

Shape426

Shape427

Shape428

Shape429

  1. Provided access to data linkage and analysis results through publications, factsheets, etc.

Shape430

Shape431

Shape432

Shape433

Shape434

  1. Formal or informal partnerships with agencies with which we can collaborate on data linkage and analysis efforts

Shape435

Shape436

Shape437

Shape438

Shape439

  1. Adequate access to technical assistance when we run into problems linking data

Shape440

Shape441

Shape442

Shape443

Shape444

  1. Adequate access to technical assistance when we run into problems analyzing data

Shape445

Shape446

Shape447

Shape448

Shape449







  1. List the top three obstacles that might keep you from OBTAINING data or data sets timely:


Shape450

Obstacle 1:


Shape451


Obstacle 2:


Shape452


Obstacle 3:



  1. List the top three challenges that you have in LINKING data for your linkage/CODES project:


Shape453

Challenge 1:


Shape454


Challenge 2:


Shape455 Challenge 3:




  1. List the top three challenges that you have in ANALYZING data for your linkage/CODES project:


Shape456

Challenge 1:


Shape457


Challenge 2:


Shape458 Challenge 3:





File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
File TitleMARYLAND HIGHWAY SAFETY OFFICE
Authorguest
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy