60 Day Notice

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2011 / Notices
room W12–140 on the West Building
Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also
find the docket on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov.
A copy of the ICR is available through
the docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov. Additionally,
copies are available from: Commandant
(CG–611), ATTN: Paperwork Reduction
Act Manager, US Coast Guard, 2100 2nd
Street, SW., Stop 7101, Washington, DC
20593–7101.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Kenlinishia Tyler, Office of Information
Management, telephone 202–475–3652,
or fax 202–475–3929, for questions on
these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, 202–366–9826, for
questions on the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Public Participation and Request for
Comments
This Notice relies on the authority of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995;
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended. An
ICR is an application to OIRA seeking
the approval, extension, or renewal of a
Coast Guard collection of information
(Collection). The ICR contains
information describing the Collection’s
purpose, the Collection’s likely burden
on the affected public, an explanation of
the necessity of the Collection, and
other important information describing
the Collection. There is one ICR for each
Collection.
The Coast Guard invites comments on
whether this ICR should be granted
based on the Collection being necessary
for the proper performance of
Departmental functions. In particular,
the Coast Guard would appreciate
comments addressing: (1) The practical
utility of the Collection; (2) the accuracy
of the estimated burden of the
Collection; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of
information subject to the Collection;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the Collection on respondents,
including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology. In response to
your comments, we may revise this ICR
or decide not to seek approval of
revisions of the Collection. We will
consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
We encourage you to respond to this
request by submitting comments and
related materials. Comments must
contain the OMB Control Number of the
ICR and the docket number of this

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:18 Jun 15, 2011

Jkt 223001

request, [USCG–2011–0494], and must
be received by August 15, 2011. We will
post all comments received, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov.
They will include any personal
information you provide. We have an
agreement with DOT to use their DMF.
Please see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ paragraph
below.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number [USCG–
2011–0494], indicate the specific
section of the document to which each
comment applies, providing a reason for
each comment. If you submit a comment
online via http://www.regulations.gov, it
will be considered received by the Coast
Guard when you successfully transmit
the comment. If you fax, hand deliver,
or mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the DMF. We recommend you include
your name, mailing address, an e-mail
address, or other contact information in
the body of your document so that we
can contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
You may submit your comments and
material by electronic means, mail, fax,
or hand delivery to the DMF at the
address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit them by only one means. To
submit your comment online, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, and type
‘‘USCG–2011–0494’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’
box. If you submit your comments by
mail or hand delivery, submit them in
an unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2
by 11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit
comments by mail and would like to
know that they reached the Facility,
please enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard or envelope. We will consider
all comments and material received
during the comment period and will
address them accordingly.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this Notice as
being available in the docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, click on the
‘‘read comments’’ box, which will then
become highlighted in blue. In the
‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2011–
0494’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the
‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’
column. You may also visit the DMF in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the DOT West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC
20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

PO 00000

Frm 00045

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

35229

Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received in dockets
by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the
comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review a Privacy Act statement
regarding Coast Guard public dockets in
the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Information Collection Request
Title: Oil Record Book for Ships.
OMB Control Number: 1625–0009.
Summary: The Act to Prevent
Pollution from Ships (APPS) and the
International Convention for Prevention
of Pollution from Ships, 1973, as
modified by the 1978 Protocol relating
thereto (MARPOL 73/78), requires that
information about oil cargo or fuel
operations be entered into an Oil Record
Book (CG–4602A). The requirement is
contained in 33 CFR 151.25.
Need: This information is used to
verify sightings of actual violations of
the APPS to determine the level of
compliance with MARPOL 73/78 and as
a means of reinforcing the discharge
provisions.
Forms: CG–4602A.
Respondents: Operators of vessels.
Frequency: On occasion.
Burden Estimate: The estimated
burden has increased from 19,425 hours
to 20,221 hours a year.
Dated: June 9, 2011.
C.A. Mathieu,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Assistant
Commandant for Command, Control,
Communications, Computers and
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2011–14924 Filed 6–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Intent to Request Renewal and
Amendment From OMB of One Current
Public Collection of Information:
Critical Facility Information of the Top
100 Most Critical Pipelines
AGENCY: Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 60-day Notice.
SUMMARY: The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) invites public
comment on one currently approved
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number 1652–0050,
abstracted below that we will submit to

E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM

16JNN1

35230

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 116 / Thursday, June 16, 2011 / Notices

OMB for renewal and amendment in
compliance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA). The ICR describes
the nature of the information collection
and its expected burden. The 9/11 Act
required TSA to develop and implement
a plan to inspect critical pipeline
systems.
DATES: Send your comments by August
15, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be e-mailed
to [email protected] or delivered to the
TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanna Johnson at the above address, or
by telephone (571) 227–3651.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
OMB Control Number 1652–0050;
Critical Facility Information of the Top
100 Most Critical Pipelines: Section
1557(b) of the Implementing the
Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007, specifically
tasked TSA to develop and implement
a plan for inspecting critical facilities of
the 100 most critical pipeline systems.
See Public Law 110–53, 121 Stat. 266,
475 (Aug. 3, 2007). Operators
determined their critical facilities based
on guidance and criteria set forth in the
Department of Transportation’s (DOT)

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:18 Jun 15, 2011

Jkt 223001

September 5, 2002, ‘‘Pipeline Security
Information Circular’’ and June 2002
‘‘Pipeline Security Contingency
Planning Guidance.’’ With OMB
approval (OMB Control Number 1652–
0050), TSA reached out to the operators
of the top 125 critical pipeline systems
and requested they submit a listing of
their critical facilities to TSA. This
critical facility information was
submitted to TSA between November
2008 and August 2009. In April 2011,
TSA updated the ‘‘Pipeline Security
Guidelines’’ in consultation with
stakeholders and DOT. TSA is now
seeking to renew its OMB approval to
request critical facility information from
the top 125 pipeline operators. TSA
anticipates that each operator will
report, on average, a total of 5 critical
facilities on their system, for a total of
approximately 600 critical facilities
across the top 125 operators.
Once updated critical facility
information is obtained, TSA intends to
visit critical pipeline facilities and
collect site-specific information from
pipeline operators on facility security
policies, procedures, and physical
security measures. Information obtained
on the visits will be collected on a
Critical Facility Security Review (CFSR)
Form. The CFSR will differ from TSA’s
Corporate Security Review (CSR) in that
a CSR looks at corporate or companywide security management plans and
practices while the CFSR will look at
individual pipeline facility security
measures and procedures. TSA is
seeking OMB approval to utilize the
CFSR document during critical facility
reviews in order to collect facility
security information. Information
collected from the reviews would be
analyzed and used to determine
strengths and weaknesses at the nation’s
critical pipeline facilities, areas to target
for risk reduction strategies, pipeline
industry implementation of the
voluntary guidelines, and the need for
regulations in accordance with Section
1557(d) of the Implementing the
Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007. TSA
anticipates visiting 120 critical facilities
each year.
TSA is also seeking OMB approval to
follow up with pipeline operators on
their implementation of security
improvements and recommendations
made during facility visits. During
critical facility visits, TSA documents
and provides recommendations to
improve the security posture of the
facility. TSA intends to follow up with
pipeline operators via email on their
status toward implementation of the
recommendations made during the
critical facility visits. The follow up will

PO 00000

Frm 00046

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 9990

be conducted between approximately 12
and 24 months after the facility visit.
TSA will use the information
collected to determine to what extent
the pipeline industry is implementing
the 2011 guidance document and
security improvement recommendations
made during critical facility visits. The
information provided by owners or
operators for each information
collection is Sensitive Security
Information (SSI), and it will be
protected in accordance with
procedures meeting the transmission,
handling and storage requirements of
SSI set forth in 49 CFR parts 15 and
1520.
The burden related to the renewal of
the collection for updated critical
facility information from the top 125
pipeline system operators will require 4
hours per operator (125 × 4), for a
burden of 500 hours in the first year
only.
The annual burden for the approval of
the information collection related to the
Critical Facility Review Form is
estimated to be 480 hours. A maximum
of 120 facility reviews will be
conducted each year with each review
taking approximately 4 hours (120 × 4).
The annual burden for the approval of
the information collection related to the
follow up on the recommendations
made to facility operators is estimated to
be 600 hours. It will take approximately
5 hours for each operator to submit a
response to TSA regarding its
implementation of security
recommendations made during critical
facility visits. If a maximum of 120
critical facilities are reviewed each year,
and TSA follows up with each facility
operator between approximately 12 and
24 months following the visit, the total
annual burden is 600 (120 × 5) hours.
An additional burden of 1,750 hours is
estimated in the first year only for
information collection on the follow up
of the recommendations made during
the 350 facility visits conducted in
accordance with the requirement in the
9/11 Act (350 × 5 = 1,750). The
estimated number of respondents will
be 125 for the renewal of the critical
facility data and 600 for the critical
facility review form and
recommendations. The total estimated
burdens are 2,730 hours in the first year
and 1,080 hours annually in subsequent
years.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on June 13,
2011.
Joanna Johnson,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2011–14996 Filed 6–15–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

E:\FR\FM\16JNN1.SGM

16JNN1