30-Day Notice

62818

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Notices

meetings tab and then the ‘‘View’’
button for the meeting dated November
15, 2011, to access the information for
this meeting. Minutes will be available
approximately 30 days after this
meeting. Both minutes and documents
applicable for this meeting can also be
found at an alternative site using the
following web address: https://
homeport.uscg.mil and use these key
strokes: Missions>Port and
Waterways>Safety Advisory
Committee>NOSAC and then use the
event key.
The meeting will be recorded by a
court reporter. A transcript of the
meeting and any material presented at
the meeting will be made available
through the https://www.fido.gov Web
site.
The committee will review the
information presented on each issue,
deliberate on any recommendations
presented in the subcommittees’ reports,
and formulate recommendations for the
Department’s consideration. The
committee will also receive tasking from
CDR Rob Smith, Designated Federal
Officer, on evaluating the various
requirements for licensing mariners who
will man and operate large OSVs, and
to make recommendations on same.
Dated: October 3, 2011.
F. J. Sturm,
Deputy Director of Commercial Regulations
and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2011–26126 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Extension of Agency Information
Collection Activity Under OMB Review:
Critical Facility Information of the Top
100 Most Critical Pipelines

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

AGENCY: Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 30-day Notice.
SUMMARY: This notice announces that
the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) has forwarded the
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number 1652–0050,
abstracted below to OMB for review and
approval of an extension of the
currently approved collection under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The
ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden. TSA published a Federal
Register notice, with a 60-day comment
period, soliciting comments of the

VerDate Mar<15>2010

20:47 Oct 07, 2011

Jkt 226001

following collection of information on
June 16, 2011, 76 FR 35229. The 9/11
Act required TSA to develop and
implement a plan to inspect critical
pipeline systems.
DATES: Send your comments by
November 10, 2011. A comment to OMB
is most effective if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, OMB. Comments should be
addressed to Desk Officer, Department
of Homeland Security/TSA, and sent via
electronic mail to
[email protected] or faxed
to (202) 395–6974.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanna Johnson, TSA PRA Officer,
Office of Information Technology (OIT),
TSA–11, Transportation Security
Administration, 601 South 12th Street,
Arlington, VA 20598–6011; telephone
(571) 227–3651; e-mail
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
Title: Critical Facility Information of
the Top 100 Most Critical Pipelines.
Type of Request: Revision of a
currently approved collection.
OMB Control Number: 1652–0050.
Forms(s): Critical Facility Security
Review (CFSR).

PO 00000

Frm 00064

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Affected Public: Pipeline companies.
Abstract: Section 1557(b) of the
Implementing the Recommendations of
the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007
specifically tasked TSA to develop and
implement a plan for inspecting critical
facilities of the 100 most critical
pipeline systems. See Public Law 110–
53, 121 Stat. 266, 475 (Aug. 3, 2007).
Operators determined their critical
facilities based on guidance and criteria
set forth in the Department of
Transportation’s (DOT) September 5,
2002, ‘‘Pipeline Security Information
Circular’’ and June 2002 ‘‘Pipeline
Security Contingency Planning
Guidance.’’ With OMB approval (OMB
Control Number 1652–0050), TSA
reached out to the operators of the top
125 critical pipeline systems and
requested they submit a listing of their
critical facilities to TSA. This critical
facility information was submitted to
TSA between November 2008 and
August 2009. In April 2011, TSA
updated the ‘‘Pipeline Security
Guidelines’’ in consultation with
stakeholders and DOT. TSA is now
seeking to renew its OMB approval to
request critical facility information from
the top 125 pipeline operators. TSA
anticipates that each operator will
report, on average, a total of 5 critical
facilities on their system, for a total of
approximately 600 critical facilities
across the top 125 operators.
Once updated critical facility
information is obtained, TSA intends to
visit critical pipeline facilities and
collect site-specific information from
pipeline operators on facility security
policies, procedures, and physical
security measures. Information obtained
on the visits will be collected on a
Critical Facility Security Review (CFSR)
Form. The CFSR will differ from TSA’s
Corporate Security Review (CSR) in that
a CSR looks at corporate or companywide security management plans and
practices while the CFSR will look at
individual pipeline facility security
measures and procedures. TSA is
seeking OMB approval to utilize the
CFSR document during critical facility
reviews in order to collect facility
security information. Information
collected from the reviews would be
analyzed and used to determine
strengths and weaknesses at the nation’s
critical pipeline facilities, areas to target
for risk reduction strategies, pipeline
industry implementation of the
voluntary guidelines, and the need for
regulations in accordance with Section
1557(d) of the Implementing the
Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007. TSA
anticipates visiting 120 critical facilities
each year.

E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM

11OCN1

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2011 / Notices
As part of this collection process, TSA
intends to follow-up with pipeline
operators on their implementation of
security improvements and
recommendations made during facility
visits. During critical facility visits, TSA
documents and provides
recommendations to improve the
security posture of the facility. TSA
intends to follow-up with pipeline
operators via email on their status
toward implementation of the
recommendations made during the
critical facility visits. The follow-up will
be conducted between approximately 12
and 24 months after the facility visit.
TSA will use the information
collected to determine to what extent
the pipeline industry is implementing
the 2011 guidance document and
security improvement recommendations
made during critical facility visits. The
information provided by owners or
operators for each information
collection is Sensitive Security
Information (SSI), and it will be
protected in accordance with
procedures meeting the transmission,
handling and storage requirements of
SSI set forth in 49 CFR parts 15 and
1520.
Number of Respondents: 125 for the
renewal of the critical facility
information and 590 for the critical
facility security reviews and
recommendations follow-up.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An
estimated 2,730 hours in the first year
and 1,080 hours annually in subsequent
years.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on October 4,
2011.
Joanna Johnson,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2011–26188 Filed 10–7–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[LLCOF03000 L16100000.DU0000]

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Notice of Intent To Amend the
Resource Management Plan for the
San Luis Resource Area, Colorado,
and Associated Environmental
Assessment
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the
Federal Land Policy and Management

VerDate Mar<15>2010

20:47 Oct 07, 2011

Jkt 226001

Act of 1976 (FLPMA), as amended, the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM) San
Luis Valley Public Lands Center, Monte
Vista, Colorado, intends to prepare a
Resource Management Plan (RMP)
Amendment with an associated
Environmental Assessment (EA) and by
this notice is announcing the beginning
of the scoping process to solicit public
comments and identify issues.
DATES: This notice initiates the public
scoping process for the RMP
amendment and associated EA.
Comments on issues and planning
criteria may be submitted in writing by
November 10, 2011. The date(s) and
location(s) of any scoping meetings will
be announced at least 15 days in
advance through local media and
newspapers. In order to be included in
the RMP amendment and associated EA,
all comments must be received prior to
the close of the 30 day scoping period
or 30 days after the last public meeting,
whichever is later. We will provide
additional opportunities for public
participation upon publication of the
Draft RMP amendment and associated
EA.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
related to the proposed RMP
amendment by any of the following
methods:
• E-mail: [email protected].
• Fax: 719-852-6250
• Mail: BLM, La Jara Field Office,
15571, County Road T–5, La Jara,
Colorado 81140–9579.
Documents pertinent to this plan
amendment and associated EA may be
examined at the La Jara Field Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information and/or to have your
name added to our mailing list, contact
Jill Lucero, Interdisciplinary Team Lead,
(719) 274–6327; see address above; email [email protected]. Persons who use
a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–
800–877–8339 to contact the above
individual during normal business
hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week, to leave a message
or question with the above individual.
You will receive a reply during normal
business hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document provides notice that the BLM
La Jara Field Office La Jara, Colorado,
intends to prepare an RMP amendment
and associated EA for the San Luis
Valley Public Lands Center, announces
the beginning of the scoping process,
and seeks public input on issues and
planning criteria. The EA will analyze
the BLM proposal to amend the San
Luis Resource Area (SLRA) Resource

PO 00000

Frm 00065

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

62819

Management Plan (RMP) of September
1991, to expand the Blanca Wetlands
Area of Critical Environmental Concern
(ACEC) and to analyze the terms, along
with the compatibility and suitability, of
three grazing allotments—one allotment
within the Blanca Wetlands ACEC
(Blanca allotment) and two allotments
adjacent to the current ACEC (Lakes and
Dry Lakes allotments). The purpose of
the public scoping process is to
determine relevant issues that will
influence the scope of the
environmental analysis, including
alternatives, and guide the process for
amending the RMP. The RMP
amendment and associated EA will
specifically address resources in the
project area that may be affected. The
BLM welcomes public comments
concerning the RMP amendment and
associated EA and on the following
proposed planning criteria:
1. The BLM intends to continue to
manage the SLRA in accordance with
FLPMA, (43 U.S.C. 1701. et seq.), other
applicable laws and regulations, and all
existing public land laws.
2. The BLM intends to use a
collaborative, multi-jurisdictional
approach with local, state, tribal and
Federal agencies to jointly determine
the desired future condition of public
lands and provide consistency with
existing plans and policies to the extent
that those plans and policies are
consistent with Federal law governing
the administration of public land.
3. The BLM intends to limit its RMP
amendment to enlarging the Blanca
Wetlands ACEC and analyzing the three
range allotments (Lakes, Dry Lakes and
Blanca).
4. The BLM intends to address the
socioeconomic impacts of the
alternatives.
5. The amendment process will follow
the NEPA planning process and will
include an EA. If a Finding of No
Significant Impact cannot be reached,
an EIS will follow.
At present, the BLM has identified the
following preliminary issues concerning
the RMP amendment and associated EA.
The BLM welcomes public comments
on potential issues in addition to those
identified here:
1. Compatibility of grazing with
wetland habitat and waterbird
production;
2. Need for restoration and
connectivity of wetland habitat;
3. Impacts to cultural resources;
4. Impacts to mineral resource
production;
5. Potential for recreational
development and conflicts in priorities
between recreation and wildlife.

E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM

11OCN1