Supporting Statement

SUPPORTING STATEMENT.docx

MARAD Maritime Operator Survey Concerning Mariner Availability

OMB: 2133-0537

Document [docx]
Download: docx | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR

PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION UNDER 5 CFR PART 1320

INFORMATION COLLECTION: 2133-0537


MARAD Maritime Operator Survey Concerning Mariner Availability


A. Justification


1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.


Part of the stated statutory policy of the Merchant Marine Act, 1936, as amended, Section 50101 (2007), is to foster the development and maintenance of an adequate U.S.-flag merchant marine, manned with trained and efficient citizen mariners. In order to successfully meet this mandate, the Maritime Administration (MARAD) must determine whether a current or projected shortage of mariners exists, and the Possible impact of such a shortage on the merchant marine. MARAD believes that a survey is necessary because it has received an abundance of anecdotal information indicating there is a serious existing and projected mariner shortage in different market sectors.


2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.


The information will be used by MARAD to determine if a current and/or projected mariner shortage exists. If there is a projected shortage that appears to be more than short-term, MARAD will follow up with a more detailed survey to ascertain the best means to address the shortage.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.


We believe that a mailed questionnaire will be the least burdensome to the respondents, and produce the greatest response rate.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


There is no similar current information available.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities (Item 5 of OMB Form 83-I), describe any methods used to minimize burden.


The collection of information will not be burdensome to small businesses or other small entities as the survey will be conducted by mail and require only an average of 20 minutes to complete.


6. Describe the consequence to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal obstacles to reducing burden.


If MARAD does not conduct the survey, it will not be able to assess manpower needs and thus determine if changes are necessary to federal programs and policies.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:

* requiring respondents to report information to the agency more often than quarterly;

* requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;

* requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;

* requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government contract, grant-in-aid, or tax records, for more than three years;

* in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results that can be generalized to the universe of study;

* requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;

* that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or which unnecessarily impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or

* requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information's confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.


There are no special circumstances.


8. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.


The Maritime Administration published a 60-day notice and request for comments on this information collection in the Federal Register on June 20, 2011, (FR 76, 35941, copy attached). Comments were due by August 19, 2011. No comments were received.


9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.

There are no payments or gifts to respondents with this survey.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.


By letter, the Maritime Administration will assure the confidentiality of the responses. MARAD will follow the requirements of the Confidential Information and Statistical Efficiency Act (CIPSEA), of 2002, in maintaining the confidentiality of responses. No individual responses will be released.


11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.


The collection does not include any questions of a sensitive nature.


12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The statement should:


* Indicate the number of respondents, frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a sample (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size, or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the variance. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.


* If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form and aggregate the hour burdens in Item 13 of OMB Form 83-I.


* Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents for the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate categories. The cost of contracting out or paying outside parties for information collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in Item 14.


There are approximately 830 vessel operators in the United States and MARAD intends to

survey all of them. The estimated time to complete the survey is no more than 2 minutes per

question, or 20 minutes total.


MARAD estimates that, from the total sample of 830 operators, approximately 50 percent

will respond, due to the ease of the survey, and because it is in the operators’ interest to do

so. MARAD will send follow-up reminders to encourage responses.


Annualized Costs of Burden per Respondent = $50.00 X .33 hours = $16.50.


Cost for 415 respondents: $6,847.50


13. Provide an estimate of the total annual [non-hour] cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in Items 12 and 14).


* The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and start-up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life) and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates should take into account costs associated with generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information [including filing fees paid]. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition, expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start-up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and record storage facilities.


* If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of purchasing or contracting out information collection services should be a part of this cost burden estimate. In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60-day pre-OMB submission public comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis associated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.


* Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory compliance with requirements not associated with the information collection, (3) for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government, or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices.


No additional costs are anticipated.


14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost estimates from Items 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.


The total annual cost to the Federal Government for processing the collection is estimated to be $10,200. It is estimated that one employee will spend approximately 150 hours recording, assimilating, analyzing and reporting information submitted in response to the survey. Therefore, the cost to the government is estimated as follows:


Wage + Overhead Project Time Total Cost


GS-14 $68 150 $10,200


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 13 or 14 of the OMB Form 83-I.


There are approximately 830 vessel operators in the United States and MARAD intends to

survey all of them. Of the 830 vessel operators, MARAD estimates that approximately 50 percent will respond, due to the ease of the survey, and because it is in the operators' interest to do so.


16. For collections of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be used. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.


N/A


17. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.


We are not seeking to not display the expiration date for OMB’s approval of the collection.


18. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in Item 19, "Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions," of OMB Form 83-I.


N/A


File Typeapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
AuthorDOT User
File Modified0000-00-00
File Created2021-01-31

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy