60-Day Notice

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES

49504

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2011 / Notices

0002, Airport Security. TSA has
implemented airport operator security
standards at 49 CFR part 1542 to require
each airport operator to which this part
applies to adopt and carry out a security
program. These TSA-approved security
programs establish procedures that
airport operators must carry out to
protect persons and property traveling
on flights provided by U.S. aircraft
operators and foreign air carriers against
acts of criminal violence, aircraft piracy,
and the introduction of explosives,
incendiaries, or weapons aboard an
aircraft.
This information collection is
mandatory for airport operators. As part
of their security programs, affected
airport operators are required to
maintain and update, as necessary,
records of compliance with the security
program provisions set forth in 49 CFR
part 1542. This regulation also requires
affected airport operators to make their
security programs and associated
records available for inspection and
copying by TSA to ensure transportation
security and regulatory compliance.
The information requested of airport
operators has increased due to the
security measures mandated by the
Federal Government since September
11, 2001. The information TSA now
collects includes identifying
information on individuals with
unescorted access to the most secured
areas of the airport. Under this
regulation, airport operators must
ensure that individuals seeking
unescorted access authority submit to
and receive a criminal history records
check (CHRC). As part of the CHRC
process, the individual must provide
identifying information, including
fingerprints. Additionally, airport
operators must maintain these records
and make them available to TSA for
inspection and copying upon request.
TSA will continue to collect
information to determine airport
operator compliance with other
requirements of 49 CFR part 1542. TSA
estimates that there will be
approximately 444 airport operator
respondents to the information
requirements described above requiring
approximately 535,705 hours per year to
process.
The current estimated annual burden
is 535,705 hours annually.
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on August 4,
2011.
Joanna Johnson,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2011–20250 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010

17:48 Aug 09, 2011

Jkt 223001

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration
Intent To Request Renewal From OMB
of One Current Public Collection of
Information: Law Enforcement Officer
Flying Armed Training
AGENCY: Transportation Security
Administration, DHS.
ACTION: 60-day Notice.
SUMMARY: The Transportation Security
Administration (TSA) invites public
comment on one currently approved
Information Collection Request (ICR),
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number 1652–0034,
abstracted below that we will submit to
OMB for renewal in compliance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The ICR describes the nature of the
information collection and its expected
burden The collection involves the
Federal Air Marshal Service (FAMS)
maintenance of a database of all Federal,
State and local law enforcement
agencies that have received the Law
Enforcement Officer (LEO) Flying
Armed Training course.
DATES: Send your comments by October
11, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be e-mailed
to [email protected] or delivered to the
TSA PRA Officer, Office of Information
Technology (OIT), TSA–11,
Transportation Security Administration,
601 South 12th Street, Arlington, VA
20598–6011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joanna Johnson at the above address, or
by telephone (571) 227–3651.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. The ICR documentation is
available at http://www.reginfo.gov.
Therefore, in preparation for OMB
review and approval of the following
information collection, TSA is soliciting
comments to—
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information requirement is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and

PO 00000

Frm 00074

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including using
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Information Collection Requirement
OMB Control Number 1652–0034; Law
Enforcement Officer (LEO) Flying
Armed Training. TSA is requesting
approval for the renewal of the
collection of this information to comply
with 49 CFR 1544.219, which requires
Federal LEOs or full-time territorial,
tribal, municipal, county or state LEOs
who are direct employees of government
agencies, or authorized railroad police
officers, to complete the LEO Flying
Armed training course in order to fly
armed. The course is a non-tactical
overview of the conditions under which
an officer may fly armed and the
required conduct and duties of the LEO
while flying armed. This collection
would permit TSA to collect identifying
information from law enforcement
agencies requesting the LEO Flying
Armed training course.
Information will be gathered from law
enforcement agencies who have
requested the LEO Flying Armed
training course. The information would
be gathered to confirm that the agencies
are eligible for this program (i.e., that
they are active law enforcement
agencies whose officers have an
operational need to fly armed). Law
enforcement agencies will be required to
contact the TSA/FAMS via phone or email and provide the full name of the
agency’s designated point of contact,
agency name, and agency address,
telephone number, and e-mail address
to obtain the LEO Flying Armed training
course. The FAMS will maintain a
record of law enforcement agencies and
their point of contact that have received
the training materials. If an issue arises
during the screening and verification
process regarding the authenticity of an
agency that requests training materials,
no training materials will be supplied
until that issue has either been
confirmed or resolved and a record of
such will be maintained.
Upon completion of the training, the
LEO who has been authorized by his or
her agency to fly armed will present his
or her credentials, and other required
documentation at the airport in order to
fly armed. A Transportation Security
Officer will verify all pertinent
information onsite. TSA estimates there
will be approximately 2,000
respondents on an annual basis, for a
total annual hour burden of 167 hours.

E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM

10AUN1

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2011 / Notices
Issued in Arlington, Virginia, on August 4,
2011.
Joanna Johnson,
TSA Paperwork Reduction Act Officer, Office
of Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2011–20259 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian Gaming
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Tribal-State Class III
Gaming Compact taking effect.
SUMMARY: This publishes notice of the
Tribal-State Compact between the State
of California and the Habematolel Pomo
of Upper Lake taking effect.
DATES: Effective Date: August 10, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
Section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA) Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. § 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. The Compact allows
for one gaming facility and authorizes
up to 750 gaming devices, any banking
or percentage card games, and any
devices or games authorized under state
law to the state lottery. The Compact,
also, authorizes limited annual
payments to the State for statewide
exclusivity. Finally, the term of the
compact is until December 31, 2031.
This Compact is considered to have
been approved but only to the extent
that the Compact is consistent with the
provisions of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act.

Dated: August 3, 2011.
Jodi Gillette,
Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011–20316 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]

emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES

BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
Indian Gaming
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.

VerDate Mar<15>2010

19:31 Aug 09, 2011

Jkt 223001

ACTION: Notice of Approved Tribal-State
Class III Gaming Compact.
SUMMARY: This notice publishes an
extension of the Tribal-State gaming
compact between the Oglala Sioux Tribe
and the State of South Dakota.
DATES: Effective Date: August 10, 2011.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary—Policy and Economic
Development, Washington, DC 20240,
(202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act of 1988 (IGRA), Public
Law 100–497, 25 U.S.C. 2710, the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. This amendment
allows for the extension of the current
Tribal-State Class III gaming compact
between the Oglala Sioux Tribe and the
State of South Dakota until December
31, 2011.

Dated: August 2, 2011.
Donald E. Laverdure,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Indian
Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2011–20273 Filed 8–9–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4N–P

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of a Consent Decree
Under the Clean Water Act
Notice is hereby given that on August
4, 2011, a proposed Consent Decree in
United States, State of Missouri, and the
Missouri Coalition for the Environment
Foundation v. Metropolitan St. Louis
Sewer District, No. 4:07–CV–01120, was
lodged with the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of
Missouri.
In this action the United States sought
civil penalties and injunctive relief for
violations of the Clean Water Act
(‘‘CWA’’), 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq., in
connection with the Metropolitan St.
Louis Sewer District’s (‘‘MSD’s’’)
operation of its sewer system in the City
of St. Louis and St. Louis County,
Missouri. The Complaint alleged that
MSD’s discharges of raw sewage from its
sanitary sewer system—discharges that
often are referred to as Sanitary Sewer
Overflows or ‘‘SSOs’’—and from MSD’s
combined storm water and sanitary
sewer system—discharges that often are
referred to as Combined Sewer
Overflows or ‘‘CSOs’’—violate MSD’s
National Pollutant Discharge

PO 00000

Frm 00075

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

49505

Elimination System (‘‘NPDES’’) permits
and Section 301 of the CWA, 33 U.S.C.
1311. The Complaint also alleged that
the chronic and repeated backups of raw
sewage into homes, yards, playgrounds,
parks, and streets from MSD’s sewer
system pose an ‘‘imminent and
substantial endangerment’’ to human
health under Section 504(a) of the CWA
33 U.S.C. 1364(a). The Missouri
Coalition for the Environment
Foundation moved to intervene as a coplaintiff in the federal action, and when
its motion was granted by the Court,
filed its Complaint in Intervention,
alleging similar CWA claims against
MSD.
The proposed Consent Decree will
resolve the United States’ CWA claims.
Under the proposed Consent Decree,
MSD will be required to implement
comprehensive injunctive relief to
expand and rehabilitate both its
combined sewer system and its sanitary
sewer system to reduce or eliminate
unlawful SSOs and CSOs into various
rivers and streams, as well as discharges
to basements and from manholes or
other discharge points in the St. Louis
area. This injunctive relief will be
performed over a 23-year period at a
project cost of $4.7 billion. MSD will
pay a total civil penalty of $1.2 million
to the United States, and spend $1.6
million to carry out a program that will
enable low income residents to elect to
close their septic tanks and connect to
the public sewer or to replace leaking
private sewer lines. The consent decree
also contains provisions pertaining to
the claims of the Missouri Coalition for
the Environment Foundation against
MSD. The proposed Consent Decree has
been signed by the United States, the
Missouri Coalition for the Environment
Foundation, and MSD.
For thirty (30) days after the date of
this publication, the Department of
Justice will receive comments relating to
the proposed Consent Decree.
Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General,
Environment and Natural Resources
Division, and either e-mailed to
[email protected] or
mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S.
Department of Justice, Washington, DC
20044–7611. The comments should
refer to United States, et al. v.
Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District,
D.J. Ref. 90–5–1–1–08111.
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined on the Department of Justice
Web site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/
Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the
proposed consent decree may be
obtained by mailing a request to the
Consent Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611,

E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM

10AUN1