Rule 30b2-1 Supporting Statement

Rule 30b2-1 Supporting Statement.doc

Rule 30b2-1 (17 CFR 270.30b2-1) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, Filing of Copies of Reports to Shareholders

OMB: 3235-0220

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf


SUPPORTING STATEMENT

for the Paperwork Reduction Act

Information Collection

Rule 30b2-1”


A. JUSTIFICATION

1. Information Collection Necessity

Section 30(b)(2) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) requires that each registered management investment company (“fund”) file with the Commission copies of every periodic or interim report or similar communication containing financial statements and transmitted to any class of such company’s security holders, such copies to be filed not later than 10 days after such transmission.1 Rule 30b2-1 under the Investment Company Act requires a fund to file with the Commission (1) a report on Form N‑CSR2 not later than 10 days after the transmission of any report required to be transmitted to shareholders under rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act, and (2) a copy of every periodic or interim report or similar communication containing financial statements that is transmitted by or on behalf of such fund to any class of such fund’s security holders and that is not required to be filed with the Commission under (1), not later than 10 days after the transmission to security holders.

2. Information Collection Purpose

The purpose of the collection of information required by rule 30b2-1 is to meet the disclosure requirements of the Investment Company Act and certification requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,3 and to provide investors with information necessary to evaluate an interest in the fund. The information required to be filed with the Commission permits verification of compliance with securities law requirements and assures the public availability and dissemination of information.

3. Improved Information Technology Role

Reports required to be filed pursuant to rule 30b2-1 are electronically filed with the Commission. The Commission’s electronic filing system (Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval, or “EDGAR”) automates the filing, processing, and dissemination of full disclosure filings. The system permits public companies to transmit filings to the Commission electronically. This automation has increased the speed, accuracy, and availability of information, generating benefits to investors and financial markets.

4. Efforts to Identify Duplication

The Commission periodically evaluates rule-based reporting and recordkeeping requirements for duplication and reevaluates them whenever it proposes a rule or a change in a rule. The information required by rule 30b2-1 is not generally duplicated elsewhere.

5. Effect on Small Entities

The Commission reviews all rules periodically, as required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act, to identify methods to minimize recordkeeping or reporting requirements affecting small businesses. The current disclosure requirements under the rule do not distinguish between small entities and other funds. The burden on smaller funds may be greater than for larger funds. This burden includes the costs related to the requirement that funds file their certified shareholder reports with the Commission. These costs could include expenses for computer time, legal and accounting fees, information technology staff, and additional computer and telephone equipment. The Commission believes, however, that imposing different requirements on smaller investment companies would not be consistent with investor protection and the purposes of the disclosure requirements.

6. Consequences of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent collection of certified shareholder reports would impede the Commission’s regulatory functions and impede the amount of current information provided to investors about their funds.

7. Inconsistencies With Guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2)

This collection is not inconsistent with 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).

8. Consultations Outside the Agency

The Commission requested public comment on the collection of information required by rule 30b2-1 before it submitted this request for extension and approval to the Office of Management and Budget. The Commission received no comments in response to its request.

9. Payment or Gift to Respondents

No payment or gift to respondents is provided.

10. Assurance of Confidentiality

No assurance of confidentiality is provided. Responses to the disclosure requirements are not kept confidential.

11. Sensitive Questions

No questions of a sensitive nature are involved.

12. Time Burden Estimate

The following estimates of average burden hours and costs are made solely for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (“PRA”) and are not derived from a comprehensive or even representative survey or study of the cost of Commission rules and forms. Compliance with rule 30b2-1 is mandatory for every fund. We estimate that there are approximately 2,520 funds, with a total of approximately 9,250 portfolios, that are affected by the rule. Each of those 2,520 funds is required by rule 30b2-1 to file with the Commission reports on Form N‑CSR and periodic or interim reports or similar communications containing financial information that is transmitted to shareholders. For purposes of this PRA analysis, the time burden associated with the requirements of rule 30b2-1 has been included in the collection of information requirements of rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act and Form N‑CSR, rather than the rule. Although the rule 30b2-1 information collection imposes no hourly burden, we are requesting a one hour burden for administrative purposes.



13. Total Annual Cost Burden Estimate

Cost burden is the cost of services purchased to prepare and update reports filed pursuant to rule 30b2-1, such as for the services of independent auditors, outside counsel, and the costs associated with purchasing technology or other components used in generating, maintaining, and disclosing or providing the information. Estimates are based on the Commission’s experience with the filing of registration forms and shareholder reports.

For purposes of this PRA analysis, the burden associated with the requirements of rule 30b2-1 has been included in the collection of information requirements of rule 30e-1 and Form N-CSR, rather than the rule, and, therefore, the information collection imposes no cost burden.

14. Federal Government Cost Estimate

The total annual cost of reviewing and processing disclosure documents, including new registration statements, post-effective amendments, proxy statements, and shareholder reports of investment companies amounted to approximately $21.3 million in fiscal year 2010, based on the Commission’s computation of the value of staff time devoted to this activity and related overhead. This collection, however, doesn’t cost any additional expense to the Commission.

15. Changes in Burden Explanation

This information collection imposes no hour or cost burdens; however, we are requesting a one hour burden for administrative purposes. This does not result in a change to the existing burden.

16. Information Collection Planned for Statistical Purposes

The results of any information collected will not be published.

17. Approval to not Display Expiration Date

We are not requesting authorization to omit the expiration date.

18. Exceptions to Certification Statement

The Commission is not seeking an exception to the certification statement.

  1. COLLECTION OF INFORMATION EMPLOYING STATISTICAL METHODS


The collection of information will not employ statistical methods.

1 15 U.S.C. 80a-29(b)(2).


2 17 CFR 249.331 and 274.128.


3 Pub. L. 107-204, 116 Stat. 745 (2002).


6


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT FOR REQUEST FOR OMB APPROVAL UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
AuthorSCHWARTZD
Last Modified Bypavliksimonr
File Modified2011-11-18
File Created2011-11-18

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy