Capture Energy Efficiency Measures for PIH (CEEMP)

Forms and Documents

Document Name	Status
Screen_Shots_for_CEEMP_PRA.DOCX Supplementary Document	2012-03-21
Energy Efficiency Definitions.pdf Supplementary Document	2012-03-21
2577-New_EPIC_(formerly)_CEEMP_PRA_83i_Supporting_Statement.doc Supporting Statement A	2012-03-26

IC Document Collections

IC ID	Document Title	Status
200311	Capture Energy Efficiency Measures for PIH (CEEMP) Other-Screen Shots for CEEMP	New

ICR Details

OMB Control No: 2577-0274	ICR Reference No: 201112-2577-001
Status: Historical Active	Previous ICR Reference No:
Agency/Subagency: HUD/PIH	Agency Tracking No: PRA-2011-24
Title: Capture Energy Efficiency Measures for PIH (CEEMP)
Type of Information Collection: New collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)	Common Form ICR:  No
Type of Review Request: Regular
OIRA Conclusion Action: Approved with change	Conclusion Date: 03/27/2012
	Date Received in OIRA: 02/14/2012
Terms of Clearance:

	Inventory as of this Action	Requested	Previously Approved
Expiration Date	03/31/2015	36 Months From Approved
Responses	50,400	0	0
Time Burden (Hours)	151,200	0	0
Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0

---

Abstract: HUD is creating the Capture Energy Efficiency Measures for PIH (CEEMP) data system to track the amount and types of Energy Conservation Measures (ECMs) being implemented within Public and Indian (PIH) units. The CEEMP data system is necessary in order to support the Department's Agency Performance Goals (APGs), specifically APG #13 which sets precise targets for completing green retrofits and creating energy efficient units. In addition to the direct support of HUD APG #13, the implementation of the CEEMP data system will enable HUD to provide reports to OMB on the progress of ECMs completed with PIH funding. Without the approval of the CEEMP data system, HUD will not be able to track PIH ECMs and will be unable to support the Department's APG #13 or provide OMB with ECM information.

---

Authorizing Statute(s): US Code: 44 USC Chapter 35, as amended Name of Law: Section 3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
  

Citations for New Statutory Requirements: None

---

Associated Rulemaking Information
RIN:	Stage of Rulemaking:	Federal Register Citation:	Date:
	Not associated with rulemaking

---

Federal Register Notices & Comments
60-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	76 FR 76432	12/07/2011
30-day Notice:	Federal Register Citation:	Citation Date:
	77 FR 8273	02/14/2012
Did the Agency receive public comments on this ICR? No

---

Number of Information Collection (IC) in this ICR: 1

IC Title	Form No.	Form Name
Capture Energy Efficiency Measures for PIH (CEEMP)

---

ICR Summary of Burden

	Total Approved	Previously Approved	Change Due to New Statute	Change Due to Agency Discretion	Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate	Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses	50,400	0	0	0	50,400	0
Annual Time Burden (Hours)	151,200	0	0	0	151,200	0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars)	0	0	0	0	0	0

Burden increases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Increase Due to:

Burden decreases because of Program Change due to Agency Discretion: No

Burden Reduction Due to:

Short Statement: This is a new collection. The CEEMP system will have an increased target audience of all PIH grantees, the information collected from grantees is reduced from the encompassing unit data submission requirements of RAMPS to only the energy efficiency measures being implemented by PIH grantees. Therefore, the CEEMP PRA will have an increased number of respondents but the amount of time to complete the required submission will be reduced resulting in a projected labor burden increase of $1,411,550.56 for a total of $5,884,704.00. Based on the department's current experience with the RAMPS program, HUD anticipates the projected labor burden to steadily decrease over time as the grantees become familiar with navigating the CEEMP system and upon completing their initial report submission; each subsequent submission will be an update to the initial submitted report and will require less labor to complete.

---

Annual Cost to Federal Government: $5,884,704

Does this IC contain surveys, censuses, or employ statistical methods? No

Is the Supporting Statement intended to be a Privacy Impact Assessment required by the E-Government Act of 2002? No

Is this ICR related to the Affordable Care Act [Pub. L. 111-148 & 111-152]? No

Is this ICR related to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, [Pub. L. 111-203]? No

Is this ICR related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA)? No

Is this ICR related to the Pandemic Response? Uncollected

---

Common Form ICR:  No

---

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

(a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

(b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

(c) It reduces burden on small entities;

(d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous language that is understandable to respondents;

(e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

(f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

(g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8 (b)(3) about:

(i) Why the information is being collected;

(ii) Use of information;

(iii) Burden estimate;

(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);

(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and

(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

(h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected.

(i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology (if applicable); and

(j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.

Certification Date: 02/14/2012

---