FERC-725F (IC12-1-000) - 30 day notice

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2012 / Notices
of private establishments with a
guarantee that the data will be held in
confidence.
However, members of the public who
may wish to do so are invited to submit
material in writing to the chairman
concerning matters believed to be
deserving of the Committee’s attention.
Dated: January 13, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.

Office of the Secretary
Department of Defense Wage
Committee; Notice of Closed Meetings
Department of Defense (DoD).
Notice of closed meetings.

AGENCY:

Pursuant to the provisions of
section 10 of Public Law 92–463, the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice
is hereby given that a closed meeting of
the Department of Defense Wage
Committee will be held.
DATES: Tuesday, March 20, 2012, at 10
a.m.
ADDRESSES: 1400 Key Boulevard, Level
A, Room A101, Rosslyn, Virginia 22209.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Additional information concerning the
meetings may be obtained by writing to
the Chairman, Department of Defense
Wage Committee, 4000 Defense
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–4000.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
provisions of section 10(d) of Public
Law 92–463, the Department of Defense
has determined that the meetings meet
the criteria to close meetings to the
public because the matters to be
considered are related to internal rules
and practices of the Department of
Defense and the detailed wage data to be
considered were obtained from officials
of private establishments with a
guarantee that the data will be held in
confidence.
However, members of the public who
may wish to do so are invited to submit
material in writing to the chairman
concerning matters believed to be
deserving of the Committee’s attention.

wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

[FR Doc. 2012–1022 Filed 1–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:12 Jan 19, 2012

Jkt 226001

Commission Information Collection
Activities (FERC–725F); Comment
Request

In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
3507(a)(1)(D), the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is submitting the information
collection FERC–725F, ‘‘Mandatory
Reliability Standards for Nuclear Plant
Interface Coordination’’, to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review of the information collection
requirements. Any interested person
may file comments directly with OMB
and should address a copy of those
comments to the Commission as
explained below. The Commission
issued a Notice in the Federal Register
(76 FR 67158, 10/31/2011) requesting
public comments. FERC received no
comments on the FERC–725F and is
making this notation in its submittal to
OMB.
DATES: Comments on the collection of
information are due by February 21,
2012.
ADDRESSES: Comments filed with OMB,
identified by the OMB Control No.
1902–0249, should be sent via email to
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs: [email protected].
Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. The Desk
Officer may also be reached via
telephone at (202) 395–4718.
A copy of the comments should also
be sent to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, identified by the Docket
No. IC12–1–000, by either of the
following methods:
eFiling at Commission’s Web site:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
efiling.asp.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission,
Secretary of the Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
Instructions: All submissions must be
formatted and filed in accordance with
submission guidelines at: http://
www.ferc.gov/help/submissionguide.asp. For user assistance contact
FERC Online Support by e-mail at
[email protected], or by phone
at: (866) 208–3676 (toll-free), or (202)
502–8659 for TTY.
SUMMARY:

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Dated: January 13, 2012.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.

[Docket No. IC12–1–000]

Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Comment request.

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P

SUMMARY:

Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission

AGENCY:

[FR Doc. 2012–1021 Filed 1–19–12; 8:45 am]

ACTION:

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PO 00000

Frm 00017

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

2963

Docket: Users interested in receiving
automatic notification of activity in this
docket or in viewing/downloading
comments and issuances in this docket
may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/docs-filing.asp.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Ellen Brown
may be reached by e-mail at
[email protected], by telephone
at (202) 502–8663, and by fax at (202)
273–0873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: FERC–725F Mandatory
Reliability Standards for Nuclear Plant
Interface Coordination
OMB Control No.: 1902–0249
Type of Request: Three-year extension
of the FERC–725F information
collection requirements with no changes
to the reporting requirements.
Abstract: The Commission requires
the information collected by the FERC–
725F to implement the statutory
provisions of section 215 of the Federal
Power Act (FPA) (16 U.S.C. 824o). On
August 8, 2005, the Electricity
Modernization Act of 2005, which is
Title XII, Subtitle A, of the Energy
Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005), was
enacted into law.1 EPAct 2005 added a
new section 215 to the FPA, which
required a Commission-certified Electric
Reliability Organization (ERO) to
develop mandatory and enforceable
Reliability Standards, which are subject
to Commission review and approval.
Once approved, the Reliability
Standards may be enforced by the ERO
subject to Commission oversight, or the
Commission can independently enforce
Reliability Standards.2
On February 3, 2006, the Commission
issued Order No. 672, implementing
section 215 of the FPA.3 Pursuant to
Order No. 672, the Commission certified
one organization, North American
Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC),
as the ERO. The Reliability Standards
developed by the ERO and approved by
the Commission apply to users, owners
and operators of the Bulk-Power System
as set forth in each Reliability Standard.
On November 19, 2007, NERC filed its
petition for Commission approval of the
Nuclear Plant Interface Coordination
Reliability Standard, designated NUC–
001–1. In Order No. 716, issued October
16, 2008, the Commission approved the
standard while also directing certain
1 Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109–58,
Title XII, Subtitle A, 119 Stat. 594, 941 (2005), 16
U.S.C. 824o.
2 16 U.S.C. 824o(e)(3).
3 Rules Concerning Certification of the Electric
Reliability Organization; and Procedures for the
Establishment, Approval, and Enforcement of
Electric Reliability Standards, Order No. 672, FERC
Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,204, order on reh’g, Order No.
672–A, FERC Stats. & Regs. ¶ 31,212 (2006).

E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM

20JAN1

2964

Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 13 / Friday, January 20, 2012 / Notices

revisions.4 Revised Reliability Standard,
NUC–001–2, was filed with the
Commission by NERC in August 2009
and subsequently approved by the
Commission January 21, 2010.5
The purpose of Reliability Standard
NUC–001–2 is to require ‘‘coordination
between nuclear plant generator
operators and transmission entities for
the purpose of ensuring nuclear plant
safe operation and shutdown.’’ 6 The
Nuclear Reliability Standard applies to
nuclear plant generator operators
(generally nuclear power plant owners
and operators, including licensees) and
‘‘transmission entities,’’ defined in the
Reliability Standard as including a
FERC data collection
FERC–725F
(OMB Control No. 1902–0249)

New agreements .....................

nuclear plant’s suppliers of off-site
power and related transmission and
distribution services. To account for the
variations in nuclear plant design and
grid interconnection characteristics, the
Reliability Standard defines
transmission entities as ‘‘all entities that
are responsible for providing services
related to Nuclear Plant Interface
Requirements (NPIRs),’’ and lists eleven
types of functional entities (heretofore
described as ‘‘transmission entities’’)
that could provide services related to
NPIRs.7
Reliability Standard NUC–001–2
requires a nuclear power plant operator
and its suppliers of back-up power and

related transmission and distribution
services to coordinate concerning
nuclear licensing requirements for safe
nuclear plant operation and shutdown
and system operating limits.
Information collection requirements
include establishing and maintaining
interface agreements, including record
retention requirements.
Type of Respondents: e.g. nuclear
operators, nuclear plants, transmission
entities
Estimate of Annual Burden: 8 The
Commission estimates the Public
Reporting Burden for this information
collection as:

Number of respondents
annually

Number of responses
(Documents)

Average burden hours per
response

Total annual
burden hours

(1)

(2)

(3)

(1)*(2)*(3)

1 ............................................

Reporting: 1,080 ....................

Reporting:
32,400
Recordkeeping:
3,240

10 nuclear operators + 20
transmission entities.

Recordkeeping: 108 ..............
Modifications to agreements ...

wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Total .................................

65 nuclear plants + 130
transmission entities 9.
................................................

2 ............................................

Reporting: 67 (rounded) ........

................................................

Recordkeeping: 7 (rounded)

Not applicable (see text for
discussion).

Not applicable ........................

Not applicable .......................

The Commission estimates the total
annual cost burden to respondents as:
• 58,400 Reporting hours × $120/
hour 10 = $7,008,000.
• 5,840 Recordkeeping hours × $28/
hour 11 = $163,520 (plus the record
storage cost: 143 entities × $15.25/year
per entity 12 = $2,181 (rounded)
Total annual cost burden to
respondents = $7,173,701.
Comments: Comments are invited on:
(1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
Commission, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate

of the burden and cost of the collection
of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information collection;
and (4) ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.

4 Mandatory Reliability Standard for Nuclear
Plant Interface Coordination, Order No. 716, 125
FERC ¶ 61,065, at P 189 & n.90 (2008), order on
reh’g, Order No. 716–A, 126 FERC ¶ 61,122 (2009).
5 North American Electric Reliability Corporation,
130 FERC ¶ 61,051 (2010). When the revised
Reliability Standard was approved the Commission
did not go to OMB for approval. It is assumed that
the changes made did not substantively affect the
information collection and therefore a formal
submission to OMB was not needed.
6 See Reliability Standard NUC–001–2 at http://
www.nerc.com/files/NUC–001–2.pdf.
7 The list of functional entities consists of
transmission operators, transmission owners,
transmission planners, transmission service
providers, balancing authorities, reliability

coordinators, planning authorities, distribution
providers, load-serving entities, generator owners
and generator operators.
8 Burden is defined as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to
generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information
collection burden, reference 5 Code of Federal
Regulations 1320.3.
9 This figure of 130 transmission entities is based
on the assumption that each agreement will be
between 1 nuclear plant and 2 transmission entities
(65 times 2 = 130). However, there is some double
counting in this figure because some transmission
entities may be party to multiple agreements with
multiple nuclear plants. The double counting does

VerDate Mar<15>2010

14:12 Jan 19, 2012

Jkt 226001

Dated: January 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012–1070 Filed 1–19–12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P

PO 00000

Frm 00018

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

Reporting:
26,000
Recordkeeping:
2,600
64,240

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP12–41–000]

Liberty Energy (Midstates) Corp.;
Notice of Application
Take notice that on January 4, 2012,
Liberty Energy (Midstates) Corp.
(Liberty Midstates), 2845 Bristol Circle,
Oakville, Ontario, Canada L6H 7H7,
filed in Docket No. CP12–41–000, an
application pursuant to section 7(f) of
the Natural Gas Act (NGA) requesting
the determination of a service area 1
not affect the burden estimate and the correct
number of unique respondents will be reported to
OMB.
10 The $120/hour figure is a combined average of
legal, technical and administrative staff.
11 The $28/hour figure is based on a FERC staff
study that included estimating public utility
recordkeeping costs.
12 This is based on the estimated cost to service
and store 1 GB of data (based on the aggregated cost
of an IBM advanced data protection server).
1 Liberty Midstates states that it seeks a service
area determination in order to provide natural gas
service to more than 65 Missouri communities via
the Missouri distribution facilities it would acquire
from Atmos Energy Corporation (Atmos). Liberty
Midstates would also acquire a 35-foot pipeline on

E:\FR\FM\20JAN1.SGM

20JAN1