Appendix E
Example Tables for Analysis
Table 1. Percentage of All Municipalities Reporting Community-Wide Planning Efforts for Healthy Eating and Active Living (HE/AL)
Community-Wide Planning Efforts for HE/AL |
Condition 1 |
Condition 2 |
||||
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
|
Have a Comprehensive/ General Plan |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Comprehensive/General mandated by State |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a Master Plan for: LAND USE |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a Master plan for: TRANSPORTATION |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a Master Plan for: PARKS AND RECREATION |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a Master Plan for: BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a Master Plan for: AGRICULTURE |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Objectives included in local government plan: IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPLETE STREET POLICY |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Objectives included in local government plan: SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS THAT PROMOTE STREET CONNECTIVITY |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Objectives included in local government plan: NEW PARKS, GREEN SPEACES, OR RECREATIONAL WALKING & BICYCLE PATHS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Objectives included in local government plan: ENCOURAGEMENT OF MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Objectives included in local government plan: SUPPORT FOR FARMERS’ MARKETS OR COMMUNITY GARDENS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Objectives included in local government plan: AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESEVATION |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Table 2. Percentage of All Municipalities Reporting Having Policies that Support Physical Activity: Traffic Calming and Walking or Biking
Policies that Support Physical Activity: Traffic Calming and Walking or Biking |
Condition 1 |
Condition 2 |
||||
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
|
Have a policy requiring traffic calming features |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have traffic calming feature: SPEED BUMPS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have traffic calming feature: REDUCED SPEED ZONES |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have traffic calming feature: TRAFFIC CIRCLES |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have traffic calming feature: RAISED PEDESTRAIN CROSSINGS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have traffic calming feature: CURB EXTENSIONS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have traffic calming feature: SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have traffic calming feature: NARROWED LANE WIDTHS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a Complete Street policy, for designing and operating streets with safe access for all users |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a policy that requires bicycle racks at public facilities |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a policy that requires dedicated bike infrastructure in new developments |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies for new or retrofit development: REQUIRING SHORT TO MEDIUM PEDESTRIAN BLOCK SIZES |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies for new or retrofit development: REQUIRING CONTINOUS SIDEWALK COVERAGE |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies for new or retrofit development: REQUIRING MINIMAL SIDEWALK WIDTHS TO PROMOTE WALKING IN GROUPS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies for new or retrofit development: REQUIRING BUILDINGS RELATE TO THE STREET |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies for new or retrofit development: REQUIRING STREET TREES/FURNITURE SEPARATE PEDESTRIAN ZONES FROM STREET |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies for new or retrofit development: ALLOWING MIXED LAND USES |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Table 3. Percentage of All Municipalities Reporting Having Policies Supporting Physical Activity in Recreational Areas
Policies Supporting Physical Activity in Recreational Areas |
Condition 1 |
Condition 2 |
||||
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
|
Have policies/ budget provisions related to parks/outdoor recreation areas: LIGHTING |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies/ budget provisions related to parks/outdoor recreation areas: POLICE OR SECURITY PATROLS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies/ budget provisions related to parks/outdoor recreation areas: MAINTENANCE OF GREEN SPACE AND EQUIPMENT |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies/ budget provisions related to parks/outdoor recreation areas: PROHIBITION ON UNLEASHED/UNRESTRAINED DOGS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies/ budget provisions related to parks/outdoor recreation areas: PROHIBITION OF IDLING CARS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have policies/ budget provisions related to parks/outdoor recreation areas: PROVISIONS OF FREE DRINKING WATER |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Table 4. Percentage of All Municipalities Reporting Having Planning Commissions
with Public Health Representation
Planning Commissions And Representation |
Condition 1 |
Condition 2 |
||||
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
|
Have a planning commission |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a health/public health representative on the planning commission |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a zoning commission |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a health/ public health representative on the zoning commission |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a bicycle and pedestrian advisory commission |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a health/public health representative on the bicycle and pedestrian advisory commission |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a local or regional food policy council, food security coalition or similar entity |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Someone from local government on the local or regional food policy council, food security coalition or similar entity |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Health/Public health representative on the food policy council or food security coalition |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Table 5. Percentage of All Municipalities Reporting Having Policies and Practices that Support Access to Healthy Food and Healthy Eating
Policies and Practices that Support Access to Healthy Food and Healthy Eating |
Condition 1 |
Condition 2 |
||||
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
Small Municipalities |
Medium Municipalities |
Large Municipalities |
|
Have a food service policy that requires nutrition standards for foods sold in local government buildings or worksites |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Food service policy address: LIMITING FOODS HIGH IN ADDED SUGAR |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Food service policy address: LIMITING SIGAR-SWEETENED BEVERAGES |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Food service policy address: LIMITING FOODS HIGH IN TRANS FATS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Food service policy address: LIMITING FOODS HIGH IN FAT |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Food service policy address: INCREASING AVAILABLITY OF FRUITS AND VEGETABLES |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Food service policy address: PROVIDING LOWER CALORIE OPTIONS |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have pricing incentives to promote purchase of healthier foods and beverages sold in local government buildings |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Consider accessibility to supermarkets/grocery stores in assessment of transportation routes |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have a policy that supports other transportation to supermarkets/grocery stores/ famers’ markets in areas lacking them |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Have zoning codes or provide ordinance waivers to allow famers’ markets/ farm stands/ green produce carts in public places |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
Provide funding or technical assistance for EBT machines at local farmers’ markets/ farms stands/ green produce carts |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
| File Type | application/msword |
| Author | Erika Gordon |
| Last Modified By | Erika L. Gordon |
| File Modified | 2012-01-08 |
| File Created | 2012-01-08 |