Statement 2012

Statement 2012.doc

Screening Requirements for Carriers

OMB: 1651-0122

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

Supporting Statement

Screening Requirements for Carriers

1651-0122


Justification

  1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary. Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regulation mandating or authorizing the collection of information.

Section 273(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1323(e) the Act) authorizes the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to establish procedures which carriers must undertake for the proper screening of their alien passengers prior to embarkation at the port from which they are to depart for the United States, in order to become eligible for an automatic reduction, refund, or waiver of a fine imposed under section 273(a)(1) of the Act. To be eligible to obtain such an automatic reduction, refund, or waiver of a fine, the carrier must provide evidence to Customs and Border Protection (CBP) that it screened all passengers on the conveyance in accordance with the procedures listed in 8 CFR 273.3.

Some examples of the evidence the carrier may provide to CBP include: a description of the carrier's document screening training program; the number of employees trained; information regarding the date and number of improperly documented aliens intercepted by the carrier at the port(s) of embarkation; and any other evidence to demonstrate the carrier's efforts to properly screen passengers destined for the United States.

2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.

The evidence collected is used by CBP to determine whether sufficient steps are being taken by a carrier in order to demonstrate improvement in its passenger screening in order for the carrier to be eligible for automatic fines mitigation.


3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic submission of responses, and the basis for the decision for adopting this means of collection. Also describe any consideration of using information technology to reduce burden.

Submission of this information is not automated because carrier representatives do not submit a completed form to CBP, but rather they must submit evidence of how they have complied with 8 CFR Part 273.


4. Describe efforts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar information already available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes described in Item 2 above.


This information is not duplicated in any other place or any other form.


5. If the collection of information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden.


This information collection does not have an impact on small businesses or other small entities.


  1. Describe consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is not conducted or is conducted less frequently.


If the information is not collected, CBP will be unable to determine if a carrier has taken necessary measures to prevent the transport of improperly documented alien passengers to the United States. If the carrier is unable to establish it uses proper screening procedures, it would not be eligible for automatic fines mitigation.


7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be conducted in a manner:


This information is collected in a manner consistent with the guidelines of 5 CFR 1320.5(d)(2).


  1. If applicable, provide a copy and identify the date and page number of publication in the Federal Register of the agency's notice, required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submission to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the

agency in response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.

Public comments were solicited through two Federal Register notices published on December 23, 2011 (Volume 76, Page 80375) on which no comments were received, and on February 23, 2012 (Volume 77, Page 10761) on which no comments have been received.


9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than remuneration of contractors or grantees.


There is no offer of a monetary or material value for this information collection.


10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for the assurance in statute, regulation, or agency policy.

There is no PII associated with this ICR. There is no assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents.

11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. This justification should include the reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.

There are no questions of a sensitive nature.


  1. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information.



INFORMATION COLLECTION

TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN HOURS


NO. OF

RESPONDENTS

NO. OF RESPONSES PER RESPONDENT


TOTAL

RESPONSES


TIME PER

RESPONSE

Screening Requirements for Carriers



6,500


65


1


65


100 hours

Public Cost

The estimated cost to the respondents is $130,000. This is based on the estimated burden hours (6,500) multiplied (x) hourly rate ($20.00).

13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or recordkeepers resulting from the collection of information.


There are no record keeping, capital, start-up or maintenance costs associated with this information collection.

  1. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal Government. Also provide a description of the method used to estimate cost, which should include quantification of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this collection of information.


The estimated annual cost to the Federal Government associated with processing this information is $21,840. This is based on 8 hours to review each response, for a total of 520 hours expended (65 responses x 8 hours). The number of hours expended by CBP (520) multiplied (x) hourly rate ($42.00) = $21,840.


15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments reported in Items 12 or 13 of this Statement.


There has been no increase or decrease in the estimated annual burden hours previously reported for this information collection. There is no change to the information collected.


16. For collection of information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation, and publication.


This information collection will not be published for statistical purposes.


  1. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date, explain the

reasons that displaying the expiration date would be inappropriate.

There is no form associated with this information collection so it would not be appropriate to display the expiration date for OMB approval of this information collection. This collection applied only to the 65 airlines that fly aliens to the United States. These airlines must be familiar with 8 CFR Part 273 and all of the requirements that are set forth in this regulation in order to bring aliens to this country.

18. “Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions.”

CBP does not request and exception to the certification of this information collection.


B. Collection of Information Employing Statistical Methods.

No statistical methods were employed.




4


File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSupporting Statement
Authoruser_template
Last Modified ByAuthorized User
File Modified2012-04-16
File Created2012-04-16

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy