Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and 9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Event
ICR 201202-3150-008
OMB: 3150-0211
Federal Form Document
⚠️ Notice: This information collection may be outdated. More recent filings for OMB 3150-0211 can be found here:
Request for Information
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding Recommendations 2.1, 2.3, and
9.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the
Fukushima Dai-ichi Event
New
collection (Request for a new OMB Control Number)
In accordance
with 5 CFR 1320, the information collection is approved for 6
months. This collection is approved with the following terms of
clearance: NRC is approved as an emergency clearance to meet
Consolidated Appropriations Act for 2012 requirements. This
collection will be valid for six months. If NRC decides to continue
use of the collection past the approved emergency request clearance
time period, it must resubmit to OMB under the normal PRA clearance
process for a three-year approval. In addition, OMB requests NRC to
submit all guidance documents associated with this collection with
the normal PRA clearance. It is also suggested that NRC continue to
engage nuclear licensees to verify the burden assumptions made in
this collection.
Inventory as of this Action
Requested
Previously Approved
09/30/2012
6 Months From Approved
485
0
0
461,067
0
0
0
0
0
Following events at the Fukushima
Dai-ichi nuclear power plant resulting from the March 11, 2011
earthquake and subsequent tsunami, and in response to requirements
contained in Section 402 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act
(Public Law 112-074), the NRC is requesting emergency clearance to
issue letters to 104 power reactors licensees pursuant to 10 CFR
50.54(f). The information requested will include: --Seismic and
flooding hazard reevaluations to determine if further regulatory
action is necessary --Walkdowns to confirm compliance with the
current licensing basis and provide input to the hazard
reevaluations --Analysis of the Emergency Preparedness capability
with respect to staffing and communication ability during a
prolonged multiunit event The NRC is requesting emergency review of
the information collection because this information is needed
before the expiration of the normal time limits under OMB's
regulations at 5 CFR 1320.13. This is necessary to ensure
compliance with requirements in Section 402 of the Consolidated
Appropriations Act for 2012 and the timelines set forth in the
conference report for PL 112-74.
In response to the
unanticipated events at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant in
Japan, Congress directed the NRC in the Consolidated Appropriations
Act (Pub Law 112-074 signed December 23, 2011), to obtain
information from all reactor licensees reevaluating their risks
from seismic, tsunami, flooding and other external hazards. The NRC
is requesting emergency review of the information collection
because this information is needed before the expiration of the
normal time limits under OMBs regulations at 5 CFR 1320.13. This
is necessary to ensure compliance with requirements in Section 402
of the Consolidated Appropriations Act for 2012 and the timelines
set forth in the conference report for PL 112-74: The conferees
recognize the progress that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has
made on the recommendations of the Near Term Task Force. Commission
staff has proposed a prioritized list of the Task Force
recommendations that reflects the order regulatory actions are to
be taken. The conferees direct the Commission to implement these
recommendations consistent with, or more expeditiously than, the
schedules and milestones proposed by NRC staff on October 3,
2011. The conferees direct the Commission to maintain an
implementation schedule such that the remaining recommendations
(not identified as Tier 1 priorities) will be evaluated and acted
upon as expeditiously as practicable. The conferees request that
the Commission provide a written status report to the House and
Senate Committees on Appropriations on its implementation of the
Task Force recommendations on the one year anniversary of the
Fukushima disaster. The situation meets the second criteria for
emergency clearances, an unanticipated event has occurred (a
natural disaster). In addition, this collection is directly tied to
the agencys mission to ensure the adequate protection of public
health and safety. The NRC cannot comply with the normal clearance
procedures because the use of normal clearance procedures is
reasonably likely to prevent or disrupt the collection of
information as stated in 5 CFR 1320.13(a)(2)(iii).
The current emergency clearance
request is a new collection, issued pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f),
which would impose a total of 1,383,200 hours of burden (461,067
hours annualized) on 104 licensees to submit seismic and flooding
hazard reevaluations to determine if further regulatory action is
necessary, conduct walkdowns and submit walkdown reports to confirm
compliance with the current licensing basis and provide input to
the hazard reevaluations, and perform analyses of their Emergency
Preparedness capability with respect to staffing and communication
ability during a significant event. The NRC is collecting this
information in response to requirements contained in Section 402 of
the Consolidated Appropriations Act (Public Law 112-074), following
the events at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant resulting
from the March 11, 2011 Great Tôhoku Earthquake and subsequent
tsunami.
On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that
the collection of information encompassed by this request complies
with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR
1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding
the proposed collection of information, that the certification
covers:
(i) Why the information is being collected;
(ii) Use of information;
(iii) Burden estimate;
(iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a
benefit, or mandatory);
(v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
(vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control
number;
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of
these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked
and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.