2205ss07

FOCUS GROUPS AS USED BY EPA FOR ECONOMICS PROJECTS (Renewal)

EPA ICR No. 2205.03

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

Part A

Section 1. Identification of the Information Collection

1(a) Title of the Information Collection:

Focus Groups as Used by EPA for Economics Projects (Renewal)

1(b) Short Characterization/Abstract:

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking approval for a generic information collection request (ICR) for the conduct of focus groups and one-on-one interviews related to economics projects primarily for the purpose of survey development. Focus groups are groups of individuals brought together for moderated discussions on a specific topic or issue. These groups are typically formed to gain insight and understanding of attitudes and perceptions held by the public surrounding a particular issue. One-on-one interviews, as the term implies, are individual interviews in which a respondent is generally asked to review materials and provide feedback on their content and design as well as the thought processes that the materials invoke.

Focus groups and one-on-one interviews (hereafter referred to collectively as “focus groups”) used as a qualitative research tool have three major purposes:

• To better understand respondents’ attitudes, perceptions and emotions in response to specific topics and concepts;

• To obtain respondent information useful for better defining variables and measures in later quantitative studies; and

• To further explore findings obtained from quantitative studies.

Through these focus groups, the Agency will be able to gain a more in-depth understanding of the public’s attitudes, beliefs, motivations and feelings regarding specific issues and will provide invaluable information regarding the quality of draft survey instruments. Focus group discussions are necessary and important steps in the design of a quality survey.

Section 2. Need for and use of the Collection

2(a) Need/Authority for the Collection

Over the next three years, the Agency anticipates embarking on a number of survey development efforts associated with a variety of economics projects including those related to valuation of ecosystems, children’s health risks, improvements to coastal waters, and urban visibility to name a few. Focus groups are an important part of any survey development process, allowing researchers to directly gauge what specific issues are important to the public and providing a means for explicitly testing draft survey materials.

If this information is not collected, a vital link in developing methods to better understand the economic benefits and costs associated with Agency actions will be lost. This loss will cause further delays in the development of improved estimates of benefits and costs.

This data collection is conducted for research purposes; there are no legal requirements. The materials prepared for these discussions will fully conform to federal regulations – specifically the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Hawkins-Stafford Amendments of 1988 (P.L 100-297), and the Computer Security Act of 1987.

2(b) Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The information collected in the focus groups will help inform economics projects as well aseconomics-related surveys under development. To the extent that the surveys are ultimately successfully administered, they will serve to expand the Agency’s understanding of benefits and costs of a variety of actions and could provide the means to quantitatively assess the effects of others. Participation in the focus groups will be voluntary and the identity of the participants will be kept confidential.

Focus groups generally do not yield meaningful quantitative findings and do not yield data about public opinion that can be generalized. As such, they cannot be used directly to estimate benefits and costs associated with a specific environmental action. However, program offices engaged in survey research use focus groups as an important tool in the survey development process to test and refine their ideas. The conduct of quantitative research would need to be completed to develop new estimates of benefits or costs.

Section 3. Non duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

3(a) Non duplication

It is not expected that any of the information to be submitted to the EPA during these focus group studies is duplicative or is already in the possession of the Federal Government. The proposed focus groups will address the needs of the Agency and significantly improve our ability to test and redefine ideas that will allow EPA to conduct further quantitative research on various environmental economics issues.

3(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB

On September 23, 2008 (73 FR 54798), EPA sought comments on this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice.

3(c) Consultations

EPA will use in-house staff and/or outside contractors (including possible contacts with the academic community) to develop focus group plans for areas of interest. According to OMB guidelines for generic clearances for focus groups, EPA has established an independent review process to assure the development and implementation of high quality focus groups by EPA. EPA will provide OMB a copy of the survey instrument for inclusion in the public docket.

This ICR covers the conduct of focus groups related to environmental economics projects. As such, follow up with respondents regarding the accuracy of estimated burden hours is not possible as focus groups by their very nature are structured as one-time collections. Focus groups are often conducted at facilities designed for this purpose, therefore deviations from estimated burden hours are generally small.

The need for generic ICRs to facilitate the survey administration process was discussed at a workshop hosted at Resources for the Future on October 2, 2006 entitled: Sample Representativeness: Implications for Administering and Testing Stated Preference Surveys. Generic ICRs for the conduct of focus groups were specifically identified as a means of reducing review times for focus groups and enhancing Agency’s ability to navigate the survey approval process. See http://www.rff.org/rff/Events/upload/32432_1.pdf for a summary of the workshop.

3(d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Each focus group will be a one-time collection exercise for the enrolled participants.

3(e) General Guidelines

This collection does not violate any of OMB’s general guidelines for information collections.

Information will be collected according to the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320. Respondents will be asked to participate in one focus group and their participation will be voluntary. There will be no need for participants to maintain records or submit documents or proprietary trade secrets. There will be complete protection of any demographic information collection from participant—full names, phone numbers and addresses will not be associated with responses.

EPA has developed EPA Information Quality Guidelines (2002) to ensure the utility, objectivity and integrity of information that is disseminated by the Agency. It is EPA’s intention that collection of information under this ICR will result in information that will be collected, maintained, and used in ways consistent with both the EPA Information Quality Guidelines (2002) and the OMB Information Quality Guidelines (2002). EPA intends to conduct a pre-dissemination review when the Agency prepares to disseminate information collected under this ICR.

3(f) Confidentiality

Each focus group will fully conform to federal regulations – specifically the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Hawkins-Stafford Amendments of 1988 (P.L 100-297), and the Computer Security Act of 1987.

3(g) Sensitive Questions

No questions will be asked that are of a personal or sensitive nature.

Section 4. The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a) Respondents/SIC Codes

The target population for the focus group discussions will vary by project, but will generally include members of the general public.

4(b) Information Requested

1. Data items, including record keeping requirements

2. Respondent Activities

Respondents will be asked to participate in a moderated discussion on a particular topic or issue, during which they will be asked their thoughts, perceptions and beliefs regarding the issue. The collection will be a one time event and there will be no need for participants to maintain records or submit documents or proprietary trade secrets. There will be complete protection of any demographic information collection from participants -- names, phone numbers and addresses will not be associated with responses.

Section 5. The Information Collected – Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management

5(a) Agency Activities

Agency activities associated with this information collection will include:

-- Drafting focus groups scripts and accompanying materials

-- Observing and in some cases moderating the focus group discussions

-- Summarizing focus group results and making changes to draft materials as appropriate

In addition, the Agency has established a three-member cross-office panel to review focus group projects proposed under this ICR. Membership on the panel is on a rotational basis and consists of one economist from the Office of Policy,’s National Center for Environmental Economics and two economists from elsewhere in the Agency. Each of the panel members must have experience with surveys. Only projects that have as their primary goal the estimation of benefits, the estimation of costs, or the elicitation of preferences for health outcomes, safety and/or environmental goods will be considered. Additional details about the panel review process can be found in the Appendix 2.

Under the previous approved generic ICR for focus groups, EPA conducted focus groups associated with seven distinct projects. The respondent burden hours associated with each project is listed in the table below.

Title of Project	Approved Burden Hours
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Study	116
Public Values Related to the Santa Cruz River In Southern Arizona	152
Estimating the Social Benefits of 316(b) Requirements for Cooling Water Intake Structures	160
Exploratory Analysis of Ex Ante Regulatory Cost Estimates	225
Public Values Related to the Willamette River Mainstem in Oregon	234
Estimating the Benefits of Improved Water Quality in the Chesapeake Bay	320
Exploring Barriers to Business Investment in Emission Reduction Technologies	843
Total	2050
Total Approved Burden Hours for Generic ICR	2358
Burden Hours Remaining	308

Supporting statements for each of these projects was reviewed by the internal review panel prior to their submission to OMB for approval.

5(b) Collection Methodology and Management

Focus group studies are directed group discussions that do not produce quantitative data, but which enable skilled observers to infer the underlying views and assumptions of the group that are expressed in the discussion. To facilitate interpretation, discussions are generally recorded and videotaped so that both a visual record and written transcript of the discussion are available for review. Participants are informed in advance that the sessions will be recorded. Transcripts and video tapes will be maintained in the individual project files.

5(c) Small Entity Flexibility

No information will be collected from small businesses or small organizations or small governmental jurisdictions as a result of this information collection.

5(d) Collection Schedule

Focus groups will be scheduled according to the needs of individual projects. No firm schedule for this collection has been established otherwise.

Section 6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of Collection

6(a) Estimating Respondent Burden

6(b) Estimating Respondent Costs

Estimates of respondent burden were derived from projected focus group usage over the next three years. Each program office was asked for the number and size of the focus groups that they anticipate conducting for economics projects over the next three years. The total estimated hourly burden imposed by this collection of information over the next three years for focus groups is approximately 4,078 hours or approximately 1,359 hours annually. The total burden per year is valued at approximately $41,356. There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection.

TABLE 1a. – Average Annual Respondent Burden and Costs¹

Center	Subject	Approximate Number of Studies	Average Number of Focus Groups per Study	Average Number of Participants per Group	Average Hours of Duration for Each Group (includes screening)	Total Estimated “Respondent” Hours Over next 3 years	Total Estimated Burden per Year ($)
Office of Policy,	Various (e.g, water valuation, children’s health valuation, health risk valuation, stream scouring, altruism, energy efficiency )	8	11.25	9.5	2.0	1,710	$17,356
Office of Research and Development	Various (e.g.,water quality valuation, ecosystem services valuation, sustainable communities)	13	9.5	8	1.9	1877	$19,052
Office ofAir	Various (e.g.,urban visibility, fuel economy, perceptions of new technology))	3	8	9.3	2.2	491	$4984
	TOTAL					4,078	$41,356

¹ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

² Hourly rate ($30.45) from “Total Employer costs per hour worked for employee compensation and costs as a percent of total compensation: Civilian workers, by major occupational and industry group, December 2011. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.

6(c) Estimating Agency Burden and Costs

The Agency incurs costs to develop the focus group materials, organize and conduct focus group discussions, and observe focus group discussions. These expenses will vary by specific project. The table below provides a hypothetical assessment of what the costs might be per year based on a number of assumptions regarding the level of effort required. EPA person-costs are estimated using an hourly rate for a GS-14 (step 1) based in Washington, DC. Time spent on each step may vary as well as the GS-level of the employees involved. Contractor costs will also depend on the location of focus groups, degree of involvement in materials preparation and whether written transcripts of each focus group are required. The estimates presented below assume that the Agency prepares all of the materials and that approximately 3 individuals observe each focus group.

Estimated Average Annual Agency Burden and Costs

Task	Costs (and Person-hours) Per Focus Group Hour			Total Hours and Cost
	EPA ($50.41/ Hour)	Estimated Contractor Costs1	O&M Cost	Number of focus group hours/year.	Total Cost/Year
Prepare Materials for Focus Group Discussion	$1008 (20 hrs)	--	--	156	$157,248
Organize and conduct focus group discussion (contractor)	--	$5,000	--	156	$780,000
Observe focus group discussion	$151 (3 hrs)	--	--	156	$23,556
Total	$1,159	$5,000	--	156	$960,804

Notes: ¹includes recruiting respondents, meeting space, respondent reimbursement for approximately 9 participants, and recording of discussion.

6(d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

6(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

We expect respondent focus group hours to total 4,078 over the next 3 years or 1,359 each year. These hours will be spread over approximately 253 focus groups over the course of the 3-year time frame.

1. Respondent Tally

Action	Approximate Number of Focus Groups per year	Estimated Respondent Hours per Year	Total labor Cost per Year	Total Annual Capital Costs	Total Annual O&M costs
Focus Group Discussion	84	1,359	$41,356	$0	$0

2. Agency Tally

	Approximate Number of Focus Groups per year	Estimated Focus Group Hours per year	Total Capital/Startup Cost Per Year	Total Labor Cost per Year	Total Annual Cost
Focus Group Discussion	84	156	$780,000	$180,804	$960,804

6(f) Reasons for Change in Burden

There is an increase of 1720 hours in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This increase is based on new estimates provided by the program offices at EPA on their projected use of focus groups.

6(g) Burden Statement

As noted previously, we expect respondent focus group hours to total about 4,078 over the next 3 years or 1,359 hours each year. These hours will be spread over approximately 253 focus groups over the course of the 3-year time frame. The approximate respondent burden for this collection comes to $41,356 per year whereas the annual Agency burden is approximately $960,804.

Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An Agency may not conduct of sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control number for EPA’s regulations are listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

Send comments on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460; and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20503, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA. Include the EPA ICR number and OMB control number in any correspondence.

Part B.

There are no tabulated results for this information collection.

Information gathered from focus groups is qualitative in nature. They allow for a more in-depth understanding of respondents’ attitudes, beliefs, motivations, and feelings than do quantitative studies. It serves the narrowly defined need for direct and informal opinion on a specific topic.

Appendix 1

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Focus Groups as Used by EPA for Economics Projects (Renewal); EPA ICR No. 2205.07, OMB Control No. 2090-0028

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2011)]

[Notices]

[Pages 62400-62402]

From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]

[FR Doc No: 2011-26087]

=======================================================================

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OA-2008-0701; FRL-9475-7]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;

Comment Request; Focus Groups as Used by EPA for Economics Projects

(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to

submit a request to renew an existing approved Information Collection

Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This ICR is

scheduled to expire on March 31, 2012. Before submitting the ICR to OMB

for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects

of the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 6, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-

2008-0701, by one of the following methods:

http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line

instructions for submitting comments.

E-mail: [email protected].

Fax: (202) 566-9744.

Mail: Office of Environmental Information, Environmental

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20460.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OA-2008-

0701. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in

the public docket without change and may be made available online at

http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be

Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose

disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you

consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site

is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your

identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of

your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without

going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is

placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you

submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name

and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any

disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to

technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA

may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid

the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of

any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public

docket visit http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathalie Simon, Office of Policy, (MC

1809T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,

Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-566-2347; fax number: 202-

566-2363; e-mail address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How can I access the docket and/or submit comments?

EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID

No. EPA-HQ-OA-2008-0701 which is available for online viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Office of

Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/

DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC.

The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,

Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number

for the Reading Room is 202-566-1744, and the telephone number for the

OEI Docket is 202-566-1752.

Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft

collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the

index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those

documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once

in the system, select ``search,'' then key in

[[Page 62401]]

the docket ID number identified in this document.

What information is EPA particularly interested in?

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically

solicits comments and information to enable it to:

(i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is

necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,

including whether the information will have practical utility;

(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden

of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of

the methodology and assumptions used;

(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information

to be collected; and

(iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those

who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated

electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or

other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic

submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from

very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of

specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork

burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

What should I consider when I prepare my comments for EPA?

You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your

comments:

1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific

examples.

2. Describe any assumptions that you used.

3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used

that support your views.

4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you

arrived at the estimate that you provide.

5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.

6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified

under DATES.

7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket

ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page

of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal

Register citation.

What information collection activity or ICR does this apply to?

Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are

members of the general public, although the target population for the

focus group discussions will vary by project.

Title: Focus Groups as used by EPA for Economics Projects

(Renewal).

ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2205.07, OMB Control No. 2090-0028.

ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on March 31,

2012. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not

required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays

a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's

regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal

Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed

either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate

means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if

applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA

regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking

renewal of a generic information collection request (ICR) for the

conduct of focus groups and protocol interviews (hereafter jointly

referred to as focus groups) related to economics projects. Over the

next three years, the Agency anticipates embarking on a number of

survey development efforts associated with a variety of economics

projects including those related to valuation of ecosystems, children's

health risks, mortality risk reductions, improvements to coastal waters

including the Chesapeake Bay, to name a few. Focus groups are an

important part of any survey development process, allowing researchers

to directly gauge what specific issues are important to the public and

providing a means for explicitly testing draft survey materials.

Through these focus groups, the Agency will be able to gain a more in-

depth understanding of the public's attitudes, beliefs, motivations and

feelings regarding specific issues and will provide valuable

information regarding the quality of draft survey instruments.

The information collected in the focus groups will be used to

develop and improve economics-related surveys. To the extent that these

surveys are ultimately successfully administered, they will serve to

expand the Agencies understanding of benefits and costs of a variety of

actions and could provide the means to quantitatively assess the

effects of others. Participation in the focus groups will be voluntary

and the identity of the participants will be kept confidential.

Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping

burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 2.4

hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial

resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or

disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This

includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,

install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of

collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and

maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;

adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable

instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train

personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search

data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and

transmit or otherwise disclose the information.

The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,

which is only briefly summarized here:

Estimated total number of potential respondents: 1,011.

Frequency of response: Once.

Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent: 1.

Estimated total annual burden hours: 2,358.

Estimated total annual costs: $22,385. This includes estimated

respondent burden costs only as there are no capital costs or operating

and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

Are there changes in the estimates from the last approval?

Burden estimates included here are based on the supporting

statement submitted for the most recent renewal of the approved ICR.

Burden estimates will be revised to reflect new information and will be

made available for public comment at the time the ICR is submitted to

OMB for approval.

What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as

appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for

review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will

issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR

1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the

opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any

questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the

technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

[[Page 62402]]

Dated: September 29, 2011.

Al McGartland,

Director, National Center for Environmental Economics.

[FR Doc. 2011-26087 Filed 10-6-11; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

Appendix 2

Proposed Process for Review of Focus Group Submissions

Under Generic ICR “Focus Groups as Used by EPA for Economics Projects”

1. A cross-office, standing panel has been created, consisting of three economists with survey experience, to review requests from individuals or teams wishing to conduct focus groups under the generic ICR. One member of the panel will be from NCEE. Nominations for the other two seats will be solicited from the Program offices through the Econ Forum and will be decided by the Econ Forum Steering Committee. Membership on the panel will be on a rotational basis with each member appointed to a 1-year term. Members will be permitted to serve up to five, consecutive terms, but must then step down for a 12-month period before serving in this capacity again. In order to prevent wholesale turn-over of the panel at one time, the following maximum term limits may be applied to members of the first panel (if needed):

NCEE – no more than 3 consecutive terms

Program Office #1 – no more than 4 consecutive terms

Program Office #2 – no more than 5 consecutive terms.

2. Only relevant projects will be considered. Relevant projects are defined as those with an economics component. That is, they must have as their primary goal the estimation of benefits, the estimation of costs, or the elicitation of preferences for health outcomes, safety and/or environmental goods.

3. Projects submitted for consideration must be entered into the Science Inventory Database. The Science Inventory Database is a publicly searchable database designed to track and report peer review and other science activities across the Agency. Peer review work products are divided into three categories: highly influential scientific assessments, influential scientific information and other products. Creating an entry in the database will allow more public scrutiny of the proposed research and will allow the project to be reflected in the Agency’s Annual report to OMB summarizing peer review activities.

Entries should clearly indicate whether or not the survey under development will yield data that is expected to be "highly influential." According to EPA’s Science Policy Council Peer Review Handbook, influential scientific or technical work products are those expected to have “a major impact, [involve] precedential, novel, and/or controversial issues, or the Agency has a legal and/or statutory obligation to conduct a peer review.” Highly influential scientific assessments are those that “could have a potential impact of more than $500 million in any year,” or that are considered “novel, controversial, or precedent-setting or has significant interagency interest.” Our reading of these definitions would place all surveys in the “influential scientific assessments” category. The classification of a specific survey as “highly influential” will need to be determined on a case by case basis. Most surveys developed specifically for direct input into an economic analysis for a rule or regulation will be considered “highly influential.” However, other survey activities could also be considered “highly influential” depending on the subject matter.

4. Supporting statements, clearly indicating peer review plans, must accompany each request. Individuals or teams wishing to submit a project for consideration under this generic ICR must submit a draft supporting statement for review by the standing panel. Since focus group results are not expected to yield data that can be analyzed statistically, only Part A of the supporting statement will be expected.

In addition to the other standard requirements of the supporting statement, the document should clearly describe the need for and purpose of the project as well as the projected peer-review plan to assess the quality of any potentialsurvey instruments. For highly influential projects, an external peer review panel process, as recommended by the EPA Peer Review Handbook, will be expected under this generic ICR. This panel review could take one of two forms: periodic consultations with experts in the field throughout the survey development process or a panel review of the survey development process in advance of submitting an ICR to OMB should the project advance to that stage.

5. Time-lines for project completion should accompany the supporting statement, highlighting hard deadlines where they exist. In assessing the project, the review panel will consider whether in their view there is sufficient and reasonable time to complete the focus groups given these timing constraints. As separate ICR approval will be required for administration of any survey once developed, the submitted timeline should reflect the date by which the project team expects to file the ICR for any anticipated survey administration.

26