Download:
pdf |
pdfAppendix A
Federal Register Notice Soliciting
Comments on Information Collection
Requests
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
39092
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Notices
Abstract: Source Compliance and
State Action Reporting is an activity
whereby State, District, Local, and
Commonwealth governments (hereafter
referred to as either ‘‘states/locals’’ or
‘‘state and local agencies’’) make air
compliance and enforcement
information available to the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA
or the Agency) on a cyclic basis via
input to the Air Facility System (AFS).
The information provided to EPA
includes compliance activities and
determinations, and enforcement
activities. EPA uses this information to
assess progress toward meeting
emission requirements developed under
the authority of the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act) to protect and maintain the
atmospheric environment and the
public health. The EPA and many of the
state and local agencies access the data
in AFS to assist them in the
management of their air pollution
control programs. This renewal
information collection request (ICR)
affects oversight of approximately
39,005 stationary sources by 99 state
and local agencies and the Federal EPA.
On average, the burden imposed by this
collection amounts to approximately
one-tenth of a full-time equivalent
employee for each small state and local
agency, one-fourth of a full-time
equivalent employee for each medium
sized state and local agency and one and
one-tenth of a full-time equivalent
employee for each large sized state and
local agency for national reporting of
compliance and enforcement related
data under all of the applicable Clean
Air Act programs.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 92 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
Respondents/Affected Entities: State
and Local Agencies.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Jul 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Estimated Number of Respondents:
99.
Frequency of Response: Every 60
days.
Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden:
54,384.
Estimated Total Annual Cost:
$2,843,187 in labor costs. There are no
capital or O&M costs.
Changes in the Estimates: There is a
decrease of 18,689 hours in the total
estimated burden currently identified in
the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR
Burdens. This decrease is due to a
continuing decrease in the number of
major sources in the reportable universe
and a reported decrease of time and
resources available for use in data
management by small and medium
sized agencies.
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Joseph A. Sierra,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies
Division.
[FR Doc. 2011–16728 Filed 7–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0439; EPA–HQ–OW–
2011–0442; EPA–HQ–OW–2011–0443; FRL–
9429–6]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Disinfectants/
Disinfection Byproducts, Chemical and
Radionuclides; Microbial; and Public
Water System Supervision Program
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document
announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request to renew existing
approved Information Collection
Requests (ICRs) to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). The
ICRs scheduled to expire are
Disinfectants/Disinfection Byproducts,
Chemical and Radionuclides Rules ICR
expires on December 31, 2011;
Microbial Rules ICR expires on April 30,
2012; and Public Water System
Supervision ICR expires on March 31,
2012. Before submitting the ICR to OMB
for review and approval, EPA is
soliciting comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection
as described below.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before September 6, 2011.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by the Docket ID EPA–HQ–
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OW–2011–0439 (Disinfectants/
Disinfection Byproducts, Chemical and
Radionuclides Rules); EPA–HQ–OW–
2011–0442 (Microbial Rules); and EPA–
HQ–OW–2011–0443 (Public Water
System Supervision), by one of the
following methods:
• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: OW–[email protected]
• Mail: Water Docket, US
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), Water Docket,
MC: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
Public Reading Room, EPA
Headquarters West Building, Room
3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments
identified by the Docket ID numbers
identified in the ADDRESSES section for
each item in the text. EPA’s policy is
that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit
information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
http://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Notices
Docket Center homepage at http://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Reed, Drinking Water
Protection Division, Office of Ground
Water and Drinking Water, (4606M),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: 202–564–
4719; e-mail address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How can I access the docket and/or
submit comments?
EPA has established a public docket
for each of the ICRs identified in the
ADDRESSES section, which are available
for online viewing at http://
www.regulations.gov, or in person
viewing at the Water Docket in the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Reading Room
is 202–566–1744, and the telephone
number for the Water Docket is 202–
566–2426.
Use http://www.regulations.gov to
obtain a copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of
the contents of the docket, and to access
those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in
the docket ID number identified in this
document.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
What information is EPA particularly
interested in?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable it
to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Jul 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses. In
particular, EPA is requesting comments
from small public water systems (those
that serve less than 10,000 customers)
on examples of specific additional
efforts that EPA could make to reduce
the paperwork burden for small public
water systems affected by this
collection. The small public water
systems include community water
systems, and non-transient noncommunity water systems such as
schools and hospitals, in addition to
transient non-community water systems
such as restaurants and campgrounds.
What should I consider when I prepare
my comments for EPA?
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible and provide specific examples.
2. Describe any assumptions that you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate that you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve
the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date,
and Federal Register citation.
What information collection activity or
ICR does this apply to?
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–
0439.
Affected entities: Entities potentially
affected by this action are new and
existing public water systems (PWS),
primacy agencies, and EPA.
Title: Disinfectants/Disinfection
Byproducts, Chemical, and
Radionuclides Rules (Renewal).
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1896.09,
OMB Control No. 2040–0204.
ICR status: This ICR is currently
scheduled to expire on December 31,
2011. An Agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information,
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for EPA’s regulations in title 40
of the CFR, after appearing in the
Federal Register when approved, are
listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39093
Register or by other appropriate means,
such as on the related collection
instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in
certain EPA regulations is consolidated
in 40 CFR part 9.
Abstract: The Disinfectants/
Disinfection Byproducts, Chemical and
Radionuclides Rules ICR examines
PWS, primacy agency and EPA burden
and costs for recordkeeping and
reporting requirements in support of the
chemical drinking water regulations.
These recordkeeping and reporting
requirements are mandatory for
compliance with 40 CFR parts 141 and
142. The following chemical regulations
are included: Stage 1 Disinfectants and
Disinfection Byproducts Rule (Stage 1
DBPR), Stage 2 Disinfectants and
Disinfection Byproducts Rule (Stage 2
DBPR), Chemical Phase Rules (Phases
II/IIB/V), 1976 Radionuclides Rule and
2000 Radionuclides Rule, Total
Trihalomethanes (TTHM) Rule,
Disinfectant Residual Monitoring and
Associated Activities under the Surface
Water Treatment Rule, Arsenic Rule,
Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) and
revisions. Future chemical-related
rulemakings will be added to this
consolidated ICR after the regulations
are finalized and the initial, rulespecific, ICRs are due to expire.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 0.40 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 246,048.
Frequency of response: varies by
requirement (i.e., on occasion, monthly,
quarterly, semi-annually, annually,
biennially, and every 3, 6, and 9 years).
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
39094
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Notices
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: varies by
requirement.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
6,987,131 hours.
Estimated total annualized capital/
startup costs: $6,918,000.
Estimated total annual maintenance
and operational costs: $203,672,204.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Are there changes in the estimates from
the last approval?
There is no estimated increase or
decrease of hours in the total estimated
respondent burden compared with that
identified in the ICR currently approved
by OMB.
What information collection activity or
ICR does this apply to?
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–
0442.
Affected entities: Entities potentially
affected by this action are new and
existing public water systems (PWS),
primacy agencies, and EPA.
Title: Microbial Rules (Renewal).
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 1895.07,
OMB Control No. 2040–0205
ICR status: This ICR is currently
scheduled to expire on April 30, 2012.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,
after appearing in the Federal Register
when approved, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on
the related collection instrument or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR
part 9.
Abstract: The Microbial Rules
Renewal ICR examines PWS, primacy
agency and EPA burden and costs for
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements in support of the microbial
drinking water regulations. These
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements are mandatory for
compliance with 40 CFR parts 141 and
142. The following microbial
regulations are included: Surface Water
Treatment Rule (SWTR), Total Coliform
Rule (TCR), Interim Enhanced Surface
Water Treatment Rule (IESWTR), Filter
Backwash Recycling Rule (FBRR), Long
Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule (LT1ESWTR), Long
Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule (LT2ESWTR), Ground
Water Rule, and the Aircraft Drinking
Water Rule. Although the Aircraft
Drinking Water Rule has a stand-alone
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Jul 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
ICR at this time, it is being included into
the Microbial ICR due to the nature of
information collected. The information
collected for the Aircraft Drinking Water
Rule is directly correlated to
information collected under the Total
Coliform Rule, and therefore is
appropriate to be included in the
Microbial ICR. Future microbial-related
rulemakings will be added to this
consolidated ICR after the regulations
are finalized and the initial, rulespecific, ICRs are due to expire.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 0.79 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 161,337.
Frequency of response: Varies by
requirement (i.e., on occasion, monthly,
quarterly, semi-annually, and annually.
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 72.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
9,172,188 hours.
Estimated total annualized capital/
startup costs: $32,888,601.
Estimated total annual maintenance
and operational costs: $88,222,000.
Are there changes in the estimates from
the last approval?
There is an increase of 17,583 hours
in the total estimated respondent
burden compared with that identified in
the ICR currently approved by OMB.
This increase reflects EPA’s inclusion of
the information collection requirements
of the Aircraft Drinking Water Rule,
which was previously a stand-alone
ICR.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
What information collection activity or
ICR does this apply to?
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2011–
0443.
Affected entities: Entities potentially
affected by this action are new and
existing public water systems (PWS),
primacy agencies, and EPA.
Title: Public Water System
Supervision Program (Renewal).
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 0270.45,
OMB Control No. 2040–0090.
ICR status: This ICR is currently
scheduled to expire on March 31, 2012.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,
after appearing in the Federal Register
when approved, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on
the related collection instrument or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR
part 9.
Abstract: The Public Water System
Supervision (PWSS) Program Renewal
ICR examines PWS, primacy agency,
EPA, and tribal operator certification
provider burden and costs for ‘‘crosscutting’’ recordkeeping and reporting
requirements (i.e., the burden and costs
for complying with drinking water
information requirements that are not
associated with contaminant-specific
rulemakings). These activities which
have record keeping and reporting
requirements that are mandatory for
compliance with 40 CFR parts 141 and
142 include the following: Consumer
Confidence Reports (CCRs), Primacy
Regulation Activities, Variance and
Exemption Rule (V/E Rule), General
State Primacy Activities, Public
Notification (PN) and Proficiency
Testing Studies for Drinking Water
Laboratories. The information collection
activities for both the Operator
Certification/Expense Reimbursement
Program and the Capacity Development
Program are driven by the grant
withholding and reporting provisions
under Sections 1419 and 1420,
respectively, of the Safe Drinking Water
Act. Although the Tribal Operator
Certification Program is voluntary, the
information collection is driven by grant
eligibility requirements outlined in the
Drinking Water Infrastructure Grant
Tribal Set-Aside Program Final
Guidelines and the Tribal Drinking
Water Operator Certification Program
Guidelines.
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 128 / Tuesday, July 5, 2011 / Notices
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 6.5 hours per
response. Burden means the total time,
effort, or financial resources expended
by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency. This includes the
time needed to review instructions;
develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes
of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing
and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 161,682.
Frequency of response: Varies by
requirement (i.e., on occasion, monthly,
quarterly, semi-annually, and annually).
Estimated total average number of
responses for each respondent: 3.1.
Estimated total annual burden hours:
3,249,695 hours.
Estimated total annual costs:
$119,174,000. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $97,636,000
and an estimated cost of $21,538,000 for
capital investment or maintenance and
operational costs.
srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Are there changes in the estimates from
the last approval?
There is no estimated increase or
decrease of hours in the total estimated
respondent burden compared with that
identified in the ICR currently approved
by OMB.
What is the next step in the process for
these ICRs?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICRs as
appropriate. The final ICR packages will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice pursuant
to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce
the submission of the ICRs to OMB and
the opportunity to submit additional
comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about these ICRs or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
VerDate Mar<15>2010
17:58 Jul 01, 2011
Jkt 223001
Dated: June 28, 2011.
Ronald W. Bergman,
Acting Director, Office of Ground Water and
Drinking Water.
[FR Doc. 2011–16731 Filed 7–1–11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–UST–2010–0651; FRL–9428–8]
Compatibility of Underground Storage
Tank Systems With Biofuel Blends
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of final guidance.
AGENCY:
EPA is issuing final guidance
on how owners and operators of
underground storage tanks (USTs) can
demonstrate compliance with the
Federal compatibility requirement for
UST systems storing gasoline containing
greater than 10 percent ethanol or diesel
containing greater than 20 percent
biodiesel.
SUMMARY:
EPA established a docket
for this action under Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–UST–2010–0651. All
documents and public comments in the
document are available at http://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the UST Docket in the EPA
Headquarters Library, located at EPA
West Building, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744. The telephone number for
the UST Docket is (202) 566–0270.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrea Barbery, Office of Underground
Storage Tanks, Mail Code 5402P, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (703)
603–7137; e-mail address:
[email protected].
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This guidance is for owners and
operators of underground storage tank
(UST) systems (hereafter referred to as
tank owners) regulated by 40 CFR Part
280, who intend to store gasoline
blended with greater than 10 percent
ethanol or diesel blended with greater
than 20 percent biodiesel.
40 CFR Part 280, and therefore this
guidance, applies in Indian country and
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39095
in states and territories (hereafter
referred to as states) that do not have
state program approval (SPA). You can
view a map of SPA states with approved
UST programs at: http://www.epa.gov/
oust/states/spamap.htm. SPA states
may find this guidance relevant and
useful because they also have a
compatibility requirement that is similar
to the Federal compatibility
requirement. You can view statespecific requirements for SPA states at:
http://www.epa.gov/oust/fedlaws/
spa_frs.htm.
B. How can I get copies of this document
and other related information?
1. Docket. EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–UST–2010–0651. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically through
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the UST Docket in the EPA Docket
Center, located at EPA West Building,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC 20460. The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding
Federal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744. The telephone number for
the UST Docket is (202) 566–0270.
2. Electronic Access. EPA established
a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–UST–2010–0651. All
documents and public comments in the
document are available at http://
www.regulations.gov. In addition to
being available in the UST docket, an
electronic copy of this guidance is also
available on EPA’s Office of
Underground Storage Tanks Web site at
http://www.epa.gov/oust.
II. Background
A. Statutory Authority
This guidance discusses the Federal
UST compatibility requirement
promulgated under the authority of
Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal
Act (SWDA), as amended. 42 U.S.C.
6991b et seq. You can find this
requirement, which is referenced and
discussed in the guidance, in 40 CFR
280.32.
B. Underground Storage Tank
Compatibility Requirement
To protect groundwater, a source of
drinking water for nearly half of all
Americans, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) regulates UST
systems storing petroleum or hazardous
substances under authority of Subtitle I
of the Solid Waste Disposal Act
(SWDA), as amended. Tanks storing
E:\FR\FM\05JYN1.SGM
05JYN1
Appendix B
Surface Water Treatment Rule
Spreadsheets
Exhibit B.1a - SWTR Unfiltered System Burden and Cost Summary
Annual
Avg. Annual
Annual
Annual Burden Annual O&M Annual Capital
Requirement
Respondents
Responses
Burden
(Labor) Cost
Cost
Cost
Raw Water
18
2,392
4,784
$
154,925
$
53,349
N/A
Coliforms
Sampling
On Site
Inspections &
18
18
61,732 $
1,999,125
N/A
N/A
Watershed
Management
Raw Water
18
52,560
3,395 $
109,927 $
13,676 $
7,001
Turbidity
Monitoring
Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring requirements under the SWTR are addressed in the DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.
Exhibit B.1b - SWTR Filtered System Burden and Cost Summary
Annual
Avg. Annual
Annual
Annual Burden Annual O&M Annual Capital
Requirement
Respondents
Responses
Burden
(Labor) Cost
Cost
Cost
Finished Water
6,305
17,984,604
1,713,708 $ 55,496,729 $ 4,347,445 $
2,199,120
Turbidity
Monitoring
Note: Disinfectant residual monitoring requirements under the SWTR are addressed in the DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.
Exhibit B.1c - Total SWTR PWS (Filtered + Unfiltered System) Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Totals for
Unfiltered and
Filtered Systems
Annual
Respondents
6,323
Avg. Annual
Responses
18,039,574
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual Capital
Cost
1,783,619
$
$
$
57,760,706
4,414,470
2,206,121
Exhibit B.1d - SWTR State Burden and Cost Summary
Annual
Avg. Annual
Annual
Annual Burden Annual O&M Annual Capital
Requirement
Respondents
Responses
Burden
(Labor) Cost
Cost
Cost
Finished Water
Turbidity
57
76,108
266,889 $ 11,687,587
N/A
N/A
Monitoring
Note: State activities associated with disinfectant residual monitoring requirements are addressed in the
DBP/Chems/Rads ICR.
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-1
December 2011
Exhibit B.2 - SWTR System Inventory
B.2a - Number of Systems
Surface Water
and GWUDI
Non-Purchased Surface Water/GWUDI
Unfiltered Surface Water/GWUDI
Filtered Non-Purchased Surface Water/GWUDI
Population
Category
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
<100
983
257
1,347
416
120
632
1
3
415
120
101-500
2,153
264
498
645
151
375
4
641
151
501-1,000
1,173
86
86
348
50
63
2
346
50
1,001-3,300
2,527
75
64
949
34
50
1
948
34
3,301-10K
2,143
29
23
1,010
7
17
1,010
7
10,001-50K
1,920
6
2
975
1
5
970
1
50,001-100K
392
1
224
1
223
100,001-1M
325
1
237
237
>1M
18
1
17
1
16
Total
11,635
719
2,021
4,822
363
1,138
15
3
4,807
363
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.
Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size category.
TNC
629
375
63
50
17
1,135
B.2b - Filtered Non-Purchased Plants
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Plants Per System
(SW/GWUDI)
CWS
NTNC
TNC
1.02
1.00
1.00
1.06
1.00
1.00
1.03
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.07
1.00
1.00
1.08
1.00
1.00
1.35
1.00
1.00
1.69
1.00
1.00
1.69
1.00
1.00
Total Filtered Non-Purchased Plants
(SW/GWUDI)
CWS
NTNC
TNC
422
120
629
677
151
375
357
50
63
948
34
50
1,080
7
17
1,048
1
301
400
27
5,259
363
1,135
Source: Plants per system for CWSs: From 2006 Community Water Systems Survey. Includes treated surface
water entry points.
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-2
December 2011
Exhibit B.3 - Raw Water Coliforms Burden and Cost (Unfiltered Systems)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Hourly
Labor
Rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
Total
Number of Unfiltered
Systems (SW and GWUDI)
CWS
NTNC
Labor Hours Per Sample
Yearly Sample
Freq.
TNC
1
4
2
1
3
2
1
1
-
3
-
52
52
104
104
156
208
260
260
260
260
15
-
3
1,716
Collect
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Analysis
Cost/Sample
O&M (materials)
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
22.30
22.30
22.30
22.30
22.30
22.30
22.30
22.30
22.30
22.30
Labor
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
Total
Samples/
Year
208
208
208
104
624
520
260
260
2,392
Labor
Sample Collection
(hrs)
(cost)
208 $
6,736
208 $
6,736
208 $
6,736
104 $
3,368
- $
624 $
20,208
520 $
16,840
260 $
8,420
- $
260 $
8,420
2,392 $
77,463
O&M Costs
Analytical
Materials
Analysis
(hrs)
208
208
208
104
624
520
260
260
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,392 $
(cost)
6,736
6,736
6,736
3,368
20,208
16,840
8,420
8,420
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,639
4,639
4,639
2,320
13,917
11,598
5,799
5,799
77,463 $
53,349
Sources: Cost per sample from ICR for proposed Aircraft Drinking Water Rule, updated from 2006 to 2010 dollars. Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
Unfiltered systems must measure total or fecal coliform density of source water 1-5 times per week, depending on system size (40 CFR 141.74(b)(1)).
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-3
December 2011
Exhibit B.4 - On Site Inspections and Watershed Management Burden and Cost
(Unfiltered Systems)
Number of Unfiltered Systems
(SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Total
Hourly
Labor
Rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
CWS
NTNC
Total Annual Burden and Cost
Hours/
System/
Year
TNC
1
4
2
1
3
2
1
0
1
-
3
-
15
-
3
48
115
221
418
826
1,411
2,160
2,947
4,070
7,392
15,792
48,456
(hrs)
(cost)
192
460
442
418
4,423
4,028
1,989
1,323
48,456
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,218
14,897
14,314
13,537
143,250
130,456
64,419
42,836
1,569,199
61,732
$
1,999,125
Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-4
December 2011
Exhibit B.5 - Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs (Unfiltered Systems)
Labor Hours/System/Year
(Collection, Analysis, and Reporting)
Number of Unfiltered
Systems (SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Hourly
Labor
Rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
CWS
NTNC
TNC
1
4
2
1
3
2
1
1
-
3
-
15
-
3
% Cont.
Monitoring
Calibration
Continuous
Monitoring
Verification Grab
Samples
(15 min./day)*365
(1 min/reading)
*6 readings/day*365
(10 min/sample)*1
sample/day*365
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
91.3
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
36.5
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
60.8
Total Labor
Hours/Year
754
754
377
189
566
377
189
189
3,395
Total Labor
Cost/Year
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
24,428.33
24,428.33
12,214.17
6,107.08
18,321.25
12,214.17
6,107.08
6,107.08
$ 109,927.49
Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
The SWTR requires systems using continuous monitoring to "validate the continuous measurement on a regular basis using a protocol approved by the State" (40
CFR 141.74(b)(2)). EPA assumes 1 verification sample per day.
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-5
December 2011
Exhibit B.6 - Raw Water Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs (Unfiltered Systems)
Number of Unfiltered
Systems (SW and
GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
CWS
NTNC
Activities/System/Year
TNC
1
4
2
1
3
2
1
1
-
3
-
15
-
3
% Cont.
Monitoring
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Annual O&M Costs
Annual O&M Unit Costs
Annual Capital Costs
Capital Unit Costs
Calibration
Verification
Grab Samples
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab
Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
1 per day
1 per day
Materials
Materials
Unit O&M costs *
# Systems
Unit O&M costs *
# Systems
In-line turbidimeter
Bench-Top
Unit
1/7 of systems replace
per year
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,520
1,520
760
380
1,140
760
380
380
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,520
1,520
760
380
1,140
760
380
380
$
6,838
$
6,838
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
Grab Sampling
1/7 of systems
replace per year
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
868
868
434
217
651
434
217
217
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
687
687
344
172
516
344
172
172
$
3,907
$
3,093
Note: O&M unit costs and capital unit costs have been updated from 2000 to 2010 dollars.
The SWTR requires systems using continuous monitoring to "validate the continuous measurement on a regular basis using a protocol approved by the State" (40 CFR 141.74(b)(2)). EPA assumes 1 verification sample per day.
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-6
December 2011
Exhibit B.7 - Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs (Filtered Systems)
Number of Filtered NonPurchased Plants (SW and
GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Hourly
Labor
Rate
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
CWS
NTNC
TNC
415
640
346
947
1,011
601
369
224
237
16
121
150
50
34
7
1
-
628
376
63
50
17
-
4,807
363
1,135
Labor Hours/System/Year
(Collection, Analysis, and Reporting)
% Cont.
Monitoring
50%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Calibration
Continuous
Monitoring
(15 min./day)*365
(1 min/reading)
*6 readings/day*365
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
91
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
37
Verification
Grab Samples
Grab Sample
Only
(10 min/sample)*1
sample/day*365
(15 min/sample)*6
sample/day*365
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
61
548
548
548
548
548
548
548
548
548
548
Total Labor
Hours/Year
Total Labor
Cost/Year
481,874
482,486
86,583
194,474
195,223
113,527
69,587
42,243
44,694
3,017
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
15,605,022
15,624,818
2,803,905
6,297,837
6,322,090
3,676,464
2,253,514
1,367,987
1,447,379
97,713
1,713,708
$
55,496,729
Note: EPA assumes that 50 percent of systems serving 500 or fewer will monitor turbidity with grab samples rather than continuous monitoring. Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011
consultations with water industry representatives.
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-7
December 2011
Exhibit B.8 - Finished Water Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs (Filtered Systems)
Number of Filtered NonPurchased Plants (SW and
GWUDI)
Population
Category
CWS
NTNC
TNC
Activities/System/Year
% Cont.
Monitoring
Calibration
1 per day
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
415
640
346
947
1,011
601
369
224
237
16
121
150
50
34
7
1
-
628
376
63
50
17
-
Total
4,807
363
1,135
50%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
Verification
Grab Samples
1 per day
Routine Grab
Samples
Continuous
Monitoring
6 per day
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
365
Annual O&M Costs
Annual O&M Unit Costs
2,190
2,190
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Materials
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Grab
Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
Materials
Unit O&M costs *
# Systems
Unit O&M costs *
# Systems
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
380
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
221,263
221,544
174,416
391,754
393,263
228,693
140,179
85,095
90,034
6,078
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
442,527
443,088
174,416
391,754
393,263
228,693
140,179
85,095
90,034
6,078
$
1,952,319
$
2,395,126
Annual Capital Costs
Capital Unit Costs
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
Continuous
Monitoring
Grab Sampling
In-line turbidimeter
Bench-Top
Unit
1/7 of systems
replace per year
1/7 of systems
replace per year
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
1,520
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
1,203
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
126,436
126,597
99,666
223,860
224,722
130,682
80,102
48,626
51,448
3,473
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
200,191
200,445
78,902
177,222
177,905
103,456
63,414
38,495
40,729
2,750
$
1,115,611
$
1,083,510
Note: EPA assumes that 50 percent of SWTR systems serving 500 or fewer take grab samples only; the other 50 percent monitor continuously. O&M unit costs and capital unit costs updated from 2000 to 2010 dollars.
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-8
December 2011
Exhibit B.9
Surface Water Treatment Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden
Estimates
No changes in burden estimates based on December 2011 consultations.
Microbial Rules ICR - SWTR
B-9
December 2011
Appendix C
Total Coliform Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit C.1a - TCR PWS Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
System Monitoring
Annual
Respondents
152,979
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
3,668,442
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
3,508,253
Annual O&M
Cost
113,611,408
81,817,746
Annual
Capital Cost
N/A
Exhibit C.1b - TCR State Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Monitoring Related
Activities
Annual
Respondents
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual
Capital Cost
57
1,835,748
458,937
20,097,769
N/A
N/A
Sanitary Surveys
57
-
-
-
N/A
N/A
Total
57
1,835,748
458,937
20,097,769
N/A
N/A
Note: Sanitary survey burden for surface water systems is included under IESWTR. Sanitary survey burden for ground water systems is now
included under the GWR (see App. G).
Number of responses for monitoring for states is based on number of PWS respondents and assumes 1 response per system per month.
State burden for monitoring assumes 15 minutes to review each system's data each month.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C-1
December 2011
Exhibit C.2 - Calculating Average Number of TCR Samples for 3 System Types, Combined
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.
All PWSs
Population
Range
Minimum
Routine/
month
A
<25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-4.9K
4,901-5.8K
5,801-6.7K
6,701-7.6K
7,601-8.5K
8,501-10k
10,001-12.9k
12,901-17.2K
17,201-21.5K
21,501-25K
25,001-33K
33,001-41K
41,001-50K
50,001-59K
59,001-70K
70,001-83K
83,001-96K
96,001-130K
130,001-220K
220,001-320K
320,001-450K
450,001-600K
600,001-780K
780,001-970K
970,001-1,230K
1,230,001-1,520K
1,520,001-1,850K
1,850,001-2,270K
2,270,001-3,020K
3,020,001-3,960K
Over 3,960K
Minimum
Repeat
B
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
450
480
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
CWSs
Systems Samples
D
E=D*A
NTNCWSs
Systems Samples
F
G=F*A
TNCWSs
Systems
Samples
H
I=H*A
Total PWSs
Systems Samples
J=D+F+H K=E+G+I
28,524
5,636
6,480
1,741
1,163
821
780
598
458
433
629
687
761
468
311
452
346
215
189
146
101
85
134
149
64
27
13
18
8
5
7
4
1
3
1
2
28,524
5,636
12,960
5,223
4,652
4,105
4,680
4,186
3,664
3,897
6,290
6,870
11,415
9,360
7,775
13,560
13,840
10,750
11,340
10,220
8,080
7,650
13,400
17,880
9,600
4,860
2,730
4,320
2,160
1,500
2,310
1,440
390
1,260
450
960
15,559
1,745
747
92
51
15
26
10
13
8
9
7
5
0
0
3
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15,559
1,745
1,494
276
204
75
156
70
104
72
90
70
75
0
0
90
40
100
0
0
80
0
0
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
80,440
2,051
573
59
28
10
20
9
8
4
10
2
3
0
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
80,440
2,051
1,146
177
112
50
120
63
64
36
100
20
45
0
25
60
0
0
60
70
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
390
0
0
0
124,523
9,432
7,800
1,892
1,242
846
826
617
479
445
648
696
769
468
312
457
347
217
190
147
102
85
135
150
64
27
13
18
8
5
7
4
2
3
1
2
124,523
9,432
15,600
5,676
4,968
4,230
4,956
4,319
3,832
4,005
6,480
6,960
11,535
9,360
7,800
13,710
13,880
10,850
11,400
10,290
8,160
7,650
13,500
18,000
9,600
4,860
2,730
4,320
2,160
1,500
2,310
1,440
780
1,260
450
960
51,460
257,937
18,295
20,420
83,224
85,129
152,979
363,486
TCR Samples - combined GW+SW/GWUDI
Population
PopRange
Routine
A
<25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25k
25,001-50k
Over 50K
Total
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.2
15.9
37.7
105.1
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
Repeat
B
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
CWSs
Sys
D
Samples
E=D*A
TNCWSs
NTNCWSs
Sys
G
Samples
H=G*A
Sys
J
Samples
K=J*A
Total PWSs
Sys
M=D+G+J
Samples
N=E+H+K
28,524
5,636
6,480
1,741
1,163
3,719
2,227
1,013
957
28,524
5,636
12,960
5,223
4,652
26,822
35,420
38,150
100,550
15,559
1,745
747
92
51
81
12
6
2
15,559
1,745
1,494
276
204
567
145
230
200
80,440
2,051
573
59
28
61
6
2
4
80440.00
2051.00
1146.00
177.00
112.00
433.00
90.00
60.00
620.00
124,523
9,432
7,800
1,892
1,242
3,861
2,245
1,021
963
124,523
9,432
15,600
5,676
4,968
27,822
35,655
38,440
101,370
51,460
257,937
18,295
20,420
83,224
85129.00
152,979
363,486
C-2
December 2011
Exhibit C.2 (Continued). Average Number of TCR Samples for Surface/GWUDI Systems
SURFACE/GWUDI
Population
Range
Routine
A
<25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-4.9K
4,901-5.8K
5,801-6.7K
6,701-7.6K
7,601-8.5K
8,501-10k
10,001-12.9k
12,901-17.2K
17,201-21.5K
21,501-25K
25,001-33K
33,001-41K
41,001-50K
50,001-59K
59,001-70K
70,001-83K
83,001-96K
96,001-130K
130,001-220K
220,001-320K
320,001-450K
450,001-600K
600,001-780K
780,001-970K
970,001-1,230K
1,230,001-1,520K
1,520,001-1,850K
1,850,001-2,270K
2,270,001-3,020K
3,020,001-3,960K
Over 3,960K
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
Repeat
B
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
450
480
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
Systems
D
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CWSs
Samples
E=D*A
3,136
1,173
1,897
630
446
332
344
277
215
205
324
362
434
290
177
285
225
147
120
105
77
70
107
118
59
24
13
15
7
4
6
4
0
3
1
2
11,635
NTNCWSs
Systems
Samples
F
G=F*A
3,136
1,173
3,795
1,890
1,784
1,660
2,064
1,942
1,720
1,845
3,240
3,620
6,510
5,800
4,425
8,550
9,000
7,350
7,200
7,350
6,160
6,300
10,700
14,160
8,850
4,320
2,730
3,600
1,890
1,200
1,980
1,440
0
1,260
450
960
521
86
62
13
5
2
10
3
4
3
2
3
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
150,054
719
TNCWSs
Systems Samples
H
I=H*A
521
86
124
39
20
10
60
21
32
27
20
30
15
0
0
30
0
50
0
0
80
0
0
120
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,286
Total PWSs
Systems Samples
J=D+F+H K=E+G+I
1,845
86
51
13
5
3
6
5
0
1
3
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1,845
86
102
39
20
15
36
35
0
9
30
0
15
0
0
30
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
390
0
0
0
5,502
1,345
2,010
656
456
337
360
285
219
209
329
365
436
290
177
287
225
148
120
105
78
70
107
119
59
24
13
15
7
4
6
4
1
3
1
2
5,502
1,345
4,021
1,968
1,824
1,685
2,160
1,998
1,752
1,881
3,290
3,650
6,540
5,800
4,425
8,610
9,000
7,400
7,200
7,350
6,240
6,300
10,700
14,280
8,850
4,320
2,730
3,600
1,890
1,200
1,980
1,440
390
1,260
450
960
2,021
2,652
14,376
153,992
TCR Sampling - SW/GWUDI
Population
PopRange
Routine
A
<25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25k
25,001-50k
Over 50K
Total
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.3
16.1
37.9
109.6
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
Repeat
B
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
CWSs - SW
Sys
D
Samples
E=D*A
NTNCWSs - SW
TNCWSs - SW
Sys
G
Sys
J
Samples
H=G*A
Total PWSs - SW
Samples
Sys
Samples
K=J*A M=D+G+J N=E+H+K
3,136
1,173
1,897
630
446
1,697
1,263
657
735
3,136
1,173
3,795
1,890
1,784
12,471
20,355
24,900
80,550
521
86
62
13
5
24
4
2
2
521
86
124
39
20
170
45
80
200
1,845
86
51
13
5
18
1
1
1
1,845
86
102
39
20
125
15
30
390
5,502
1,345
2,010
656
456
1,739
1,268
660
738
5,502
1,345
4,021
1,968
1,824
12,766
20,415
25,010
81,140
11,635
150,054
719
1,286
2,021
2,652
14,376
153,992
C-3
December 2011
Exhibit C.2 (Continued). Average Number of TCR Samples for Ground Water Systems
Ground Water
Population
Range
Routine
A
<25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-4.9K
4,901-5.8K
5,801-6.7K
6,701-7.6K
7,601-8.5K
8,501-10k
10,001-12.9k
12,901-17.2K
17,201-21.5K
21,501-25K
25,001-33K
33,001-41K
41,001-50K
50,001-59K
59,001-70K
70,001-83K
83,001-96K
96,001-130K
130,001-220K
220,001-320K
320,001-450K
450,001-600K
600,001-780K
780,001-970K
970,001-1,230K
1,230,001-1,520K
1,520,001-1,850K
1,850,001-2,270K
2,270,001-3,020K
3,020,001-3,960K
Over 3,960K
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
Repeat
B
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
15
20
25
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
120
150
180
210
240
270
300
330
360
390
420
450
480
Systems
D
C
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total
TCR Sampling - Ground Water
Min
Population
Samp/
PopRange
month
A
<25-500
501-1k
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25k
25,001-50k
Over 50K
Total
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.1
15.6
37.2
90.1
Min
Repeat
4
4
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
TNCWSs
Systems
Samples
H
I=H*A
Total PWSs
Systems Samples
J=D+F+H K=E+G+I
25,388
4,463
9,165
3,333
2,868
2,445
2,616
2,244
1,944
2,052
3,050
3,250
4,905
3,560
3,350
5,010
4,840
3,400
4,140
2,870
1,920
1,350
2,700
3,720
750
540
0
720
270
300
330
0
390
0
0
0
15,038
1,659
685
79
46
13
16
7
9
5
7
4
4
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15,038
1,659
1,370
237
184
65
96
49
72
45
70
40
60
0
0
60
40
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
78,595
1,965
522
46
23
7
14
4
8
3
7
2
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
78,595
1,965
1,044
138
92
35
84
28
64
27
70
20
30
0
25
30
0
0
60
70
0
0
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
119,021
8,087
5,790
1,236
786
509
466
332
260
236
319
331
333
178
135
170
122
69
70
42
24
15
28
31
5
3
0
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
119,021
8,087
11,579
3,708
3,144
2,545
2,796
2,321
2,080
2,124
3,190
3,310
4,995
3,560
3,375
5,100
4,880
3,450
4,200
2,940
1,920
1,350
2,800
3,720
750
540
0
720
270
300
330
0
390
0
0
0
39,825
107,883
17,576
19,134
81,203
82,477
138,603
209,494
Sys
D
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
NTNCWSs
Systems
Samples
F
G=F*A
25,388
4,463
4,583
1,111
717
489
436
321
243
228
305
325
327
178
134
167
121
68
69
41
24
15
27
31
5
3
0
3
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
CWSs - GW
Addtnl
Routines
next mo
C
B
CWSs
Samples
E=D*A
Samples
E=D*A
NTNCWSs - GW
TNCWSs - GW
Sys
G
Sys
J
Samples
H=G*A
Samples
K=J*A
Total PWSs - GW
Sys
M=D+G+J
Samples
N=E+H+K
25,388
4,463
4,583
1,111
717
2,022
964
356
222
25,388
4,463
9,165
3,333
2,868
14,351
15,065
13,250
20,000
15,038
1,659
685
79
46
57
8
4
0
15,038
1,659
1,370
237
184
397
100
150
0
78,595
1,965
522
46
23
43
5
1
3
78,595
1,965
1,044
138
92
308
75
30
230
119,021
8,087
5,790
1,236
786
2,122
977
361
225
119,021
8,087
11,579
3,708
3,144
15,056
15,240
13,430
20,230
39,825
107,883
17,576
19,134
81,203
82,477
138,603
209,494
C-4
December 2011
Exhibit C.3 - Inventory of Systems with Violations (for Routine and Repeat Monitoring)
Complete System Inventory
Population
Range
GW
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
25,388
4,463
4,583
1,111
717
2,022
964
356
222
Total
39,825
CWSs
SW/GUDI
3,136
1,173
1,897
630
446
1,697
1,263
657
735
11,635
Total
GW
28,524
5,636
6,480
1,741
1,163
3,719
2,227
1,013
957
15,038
1,659
685
79
46
57
8
4
0
51,460
17,576
NTNCWSs
SW/GUDI
Total
521
86
62
13
5
24
4
2
2
719
GW
15,559
1,745
747
92
51
81
12
6
2
78,595
1,965
522
46
23
43
5
1
3
18,295
81,203
TNCWSs
SW/GUDI
1,845
86
51
13
5
18
1
1
1
2,021
Total
GW
NCWSs
SW/GUDI
Total
80,440
2,051
573
59
28
61
6
2
4
93,633
3,624
1,207
125
69
100
13
5
3
2,366
172
113
26
10
42
5
3
3
95,999
3,796
1,320
151
79
142
18
8
6
83,224
98,778
2,741
101,519
Source: TCR Inventory, pages C-1 through C-9
CWSs with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ Samples
Population
Range
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
CWS Inventory
(from TCR Inventory)
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C
25,388
3,136
28,524
4,463
1,173
5,636
4,583
1,897
6,480
1,111
630
1,741
717
446
1,163
2,022
1,697
3,719
964
1,263
2,227
356
657
1,013
222
735
957
39,825
11,635
51,460
CWSs with MCL Vios (# of Samples)
CWSs with TC+ Samples
3 x # of Vios
SW/GUDI
Total
H=E*3
I=F*3
159
3,591
51
441
126
618
51
183
30
126
180
510
186
393
51
132
33
48
GW
D
1,144
130
164
44
32
110
69
27
5
SW/GUDI
E
53
17
42
17
10
60
62
17
11
Total
F
1,197
147
206
61
42
170
131
44
16
GW
G=D*3
3,432
390
492
132
96
330
207
81
15
1,725
289
2,014
5,175
867
6,042
CWSs with "Clean" Samples
( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
J=A-G
K=B-H
L=C-I
21,956
2,977
24,933
4,073
1,122
5,195
4,091
1,771
5,862
979
579
1,558
621
416
1,037
1,692
1,517
3,209
757
1,077
1,834
275
606
881
207
702
909
34,650
10,768
45,418
Source: Number of systems with violations from SDWIS/FED October 2010. Assumes that for every system with a violation, there are 3 systems with TC+ samples that trigger
repeat sampling and in some cases additional routine monitoring.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C-5
December 2011
Inventory of Systems with Violations (for Routine and Repeat Monitoring) continued
NCWSs with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ Samples
NCWS Inventory
NCWSs with MCL Vios
Population
(from TCR Inventory)
3.96% = Vio Rate
Range
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
GW
SW/GUDI Total
A
B
C
D
E
F
<25-500
93,633
2,366
95,999
3,781
28
3,809
501-1K
3,624
172
3,796
126
1
127
1,001-2.5K
1,207
113
1,320
58
4
62
2,501-3.3K
125
26
151
7
1
8
3,301-4.1K
69
10
79
3
3
4,101-10K
100
42
142
5
2
7
10,001-25K
13
5
18
1
1
25,001-50K
5
3
8
0
Over 50K
3
3
6
0
Total
98,778
2,741
101,519
3,981
36
4017
NCWSs with TC+ Samples
3 x # of Vios
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
G=D*3
H=E*3
I=F*3
11,343
84
11,427
378
3
381
174
12
186
21
3
24
9
0
9
15
6
21
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
11,943
108
12,051
NCWSs with "Clean" Samples
( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
J=A-G
K=B-H L=C-I
82,290
2,282
84,572
3,246
169
3,415
1,033
101
1,134
104
23
127
60
10
70
85
36
121
10
5
15
5
3
8
3
3
6
86,835
2,633
89,468
Source: Number of systems with violations from SDWIS/FED October 2010. Assumes that for every system with a violation, there are 3 systems with TC+ samples that trigger
repeat sampling and in some cases additional routine monitoring.
All Systems with MCL Violations, TC+ Samples, No TC+ Samples
Population
Range
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Total PWS Inventory
(CWS + NCWS)
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C
119,021
5,502
124,523
8,087
1,345
9,432
5,790
2,010
7,800
1,236
656
1,892
786
456
1,242
2,122
1,739
3,861
977
1,268
2,245
361
660
1,021
225
738
963
138,603
14,376
152,979
PWSs with MCL Vios
(CWS + NCWS)
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
D
E
F
4,925
81
5006
256
18
274
222
46
268
51
18
69
35
10
45
115
62
177
70
62
132
27
17
44
5
11
16
5,706
325
6031
<25-500 - TC+*
<25-500 - rest
501-1K - TC+*
501-1K - rest
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Inventory for Calculating
Routine Monitoring
GW*
SW/GUDI
Total
M
N
O
14,775
243
15,018
104,246
5,259
109,505
768
54
822
7,319
1,291
8,610
5,790
2,010
7,800
1,236
656
1,892
786
456
1,242
2,122
1,739
3,861
977
1,268
2,245
361
660
1,021
225
738
963
Inventory for Calculating
Repeat/Addtl Routine Mon
GW
SW/GUDI Total
P
Q
R
14,775
243
15,018
0
0
0
768
54
822
0
0
0
666
138
804
153
54
207
105
30
135
345
186
531
210
186
396
81
51
132
15
33
48
Total
138,603
17,118
Population
Range
14,376
152,979
975
PWSs with TC+ Samples
(CWS + NCWS)
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
G=D*3
H=E*3
I=F*3
14,775
243
15,018
768
54
822
666
138
804
153
54
207
105
30
135
345
186
531
210
186
396
81
51
132
15
33
48
17,118
975
18,093
PWSs with "Clean" Samples
( =Inventory-Sys w/TC+ )
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
J=A-G
K=B-H L=C-I
104,246
5,259
109,505
7,319
1,291
8,610
5,124
1,872
6,996
1,083
602
1,685
681
426
1,107
1,777
1,553
3,330
767
1,082
1,849
280
609
889
210
705
915
121,485
13,401
134,886
18,093
* GW CWSs (serving 1,000 or less) with TC+ results sample monthly rather than quarterly.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C-6
December 2011
Exhibit C.4 - Sampling - Burden, Cost, and Frequencies of Monitoring
GW
Size
Category
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Labor Labor Hours Required
Rates Collection Analysis
($/hr) (hrs/sample) (hrs/sample)
A
B
C
$32.38
0.5 0.166667
$32.38
0.5 0.166667
$32.38
0.5 0.166667
$32.38
0.5 0.166667
$32.38
0.5 0.166667
$32.38
0.5 0.166667
$32.38
1.0 0.166667
$32.38
1.0 0.166667
$32.38
1.0 0.166667
Analytical Cost/Sample
Samples for Total Coliforms
PurchServ
D
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
O&M-matrl O&M-labor
E
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
F=C*A
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
Samples for Fecal/E.coli
PurchServ
O&M-matrl O&M-labor
G
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
H
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
I=C*A
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
Monitoring
Frequency per Year
Most
Other*
J
K
4
4
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Number of
Routine
Smp/Sys
L
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.1
15.6
37.2
90.1
Minimum
Addtl
Repeat
Routines
Samples next mo
M
N
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
3
1
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
For Systems that are TC+,
Routine
Percentage of Routine
Samples
Samples Assumed to Be TC+ that=TC+
O
P=L*O
100%
1.0
100%
1.0
50%
1.0
50%
1.5
50%
2.0
25%
1.8
25%
3.9
10%
3.7
10%
9.0
Sliding
TC+
Repeat scale- TC+ Repeat
Repeats
Q=P*M
R
S=Q*R
4.0
50%
2.0
4.0
50%
2.0
3.0
50%
1.5
4.5
25%
1.1
6.0
25%
1.5
5.4
25%
1.4
11.7
25%
2.9
11.1
25%
2.8
27.0
10%
2.7
* GW CWSs serving <=1,000 with TC-positive samples monitor monthly rather than quarterly.
Note: Number of routine samples per system from TCR Inventory page. Number is a weighted average based on number of systems in
each size category.
SW/GWUDI
Size
Category
Labor
Rates
($/hr)
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
A
$32.38
$32.38
$32.38
$32.38
$32.38
$32.38
$32.38
$32.38
$32.38
Labor Hours Required
Collection Analysis
(hrs/sample)
B
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
(hrs/sample)
C
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
0.166667
Analytical Cost/Sample
Samples for Total Coliforms
PurchServ
D
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
O&M-matrl O&M-labor
E
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
F
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
Samples for Fecal/E.coli
PurchServ
G
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
O&M-matrl O&M-labor
H
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
I
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
$5.40
Monitoring
Frequency
per Year
J
K
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Number of
Routine
Smp/Sys
L
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.3
16.1
37.9
109.6
Minimum
Addtl
Repeat
Routines
Samples next mo
M
N
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
2
3
1
3
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
For Systems that are TC+,
Routine
Percentage of Routine
Samples
Samples Assumed to Be TC+ that=TC+
O
P=L*O
100%
1.0
100%
1.0
50%
1.0
50%
1.5
50%
2.0
25%
1.8
25%
4.0
10%
3.8
10%
11.0
Repeat
Q=P*M
4.0
4.0
3.0
4.5
6.0
5.4
12.0
11.4
33.0
Sliding
TC+
scale-TC+ Repeat
Repeat
R
S=Q*R
50%
2.0
50%
2.0
50%
1.5
25%
1.1
25%
1.5
25%
1.4
25%
3.0
25%
2.9
10%
3.3
Note: Number of routine samples per system from TCR Inventory page. Number is a weighted average based on number of systems in
each size category.
Notes:Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry
representatives. Overall sample costs are conservative estimates. Many systems now use a method allowing for
both total coliforms and fecal/E.coli to be tested at one time. Average sample cost based on research conducted
for the Aircraft Drinking Water Rule in Nov. 2006.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C-7
December 2011
Exhibit C.5 - Routine Monitoring - Burden and Cost
a. Routine-GW
Size
Category
<25-500 - TC+*
<25-500 - rest
501-1K - TC+*
501-1K - rest
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Number of
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations")
14,775
104,246
768
7,319
5,790
1,236
786
2,122
977
361
225
Monitoring
Frequency
per Year
B = J or K
from
"Sampling"
Routine
Samples/
Sys
C=L
from
"Sampling"
12
4
12
4
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.1
15.6
37.2
90.1
138,603
Total
Samples/
Sys/Yr
D=B*C
Sample Collection
Labor (per System per Year)
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Total Burden
Analytical Costs per System
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
(hrs)
E = D*
B from
"Sampling"
F = E*
A from
"Sampling"
G = D*
C from
"Sampling"
H= G*
A from
"Sampling"
I = D*
E from
"Sampling"
J = E+G
Cost (per System per Year)
O&M
Labor
K=I
L = F+ H
Total Cost
per System
per Year
M=K+L
Total Annual
Burden - Hours
N=A*J
GW Routine Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
O=A*M
P=A*K
Labor Cost
Q=A*L
12.0
4.0
12.0
4.0
24.0
36.0
48.0
85.2
187.5
446.6
1,081.1
6.0
2.0
6.0
2.0
12.0
18.0
24.0
42.6
187.5
446.6
1081.1
$194.30
$64.77
$194.30
$64.77
$388.61
$582.91
$777.22
$1,379.56
$6,072.00
$14,462.69
$35,010.34
2.0
0.7
2.0
0.7
4.0
6.0
8.0
14.2
31.3
74.4
180.2
$64.77
$22.67
$64.77
$22.67
$129.54
$194.30
$259.07
$459.85
$1,013.62
$2,409.37
$5,835.60
$267.64
$89.21
$267.64
$89.21
$535.28
$802.91
$1,070.55
$1,899.94
$4,182.53
$9,961.24
$24,111.51
8.0
2.7
8.0
2.7
16.0
24.0
32.0
56.8
218.8
521.0
1261.3
$267.64
$89.21
$267.64
$89.21
$535.28
$802.91
$1,070.55
$1,899.94
$4,182.53
$9,961.24
$24,111.51
$259.07
$87.44
$259.07
$87.44
$518.14
$777.22
$1,036.29
$1,839.41
$7,085.62
$16,872.06
$40,845.94
$526.71
$176.65
$526.71
$176.65
$1,053.42
$1,580.13
$2,106.84
$3,739.35
$11,268.15
$26,833.30
$64,957.45
118,200.0
281,463.0
6,144.0
19,760.2
92,632.6
29,664.0
25,152.0
120,503.2
213,767.6
188,081.0
283,792.5
$7,782,137.01
$18,414,913.67
$404,513.11
$1,292,823.36
$6,098,809.36
$1,953,039.87
$1,655,975.55
$7,933,174.86
$11,008,986.08
$9,686,821.89
$14,615,426.47
$3,954,348.21
$9,300,016.13
$205,545.82
$652,909.82
$3,098,996.57
$992,400.89
$841,453.18
$4,030,797.76
$4,086,336.12
$3,596,006.79
$5,425,090.15
$3,827,788.80
$9,114,897.54
$198,967.30
$639,913.53
$2,999,812.79
$960,638.98
$814,522.37
$3,902,377.10
$6,922,649.96
$6,090,815.10
$9,190,336.32
1,940.4
1,827.8
$59,191.48
323.5
$10,476.22
$43,277.67
2,151.3
$43,277.67
$69,667.70
$112,945.37
1,379,160.1
$80,846,621.23
$36,183,901.44
$44,662,719.79
*GW CWSs serving 1000 or fewer with TC-positive samples.
b. Routine-SW
Size
Category
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Number of
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations")
5,502
1,345
2,010
656
456
1,739
1,268
660
738
Monitoring
Frequency
per Year
B = J or K
from
"Sampling"
14,376
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
Routine
Samples/
Sys
C=L
from
"Sampling"
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
7.3
16.1
37.9
109.6
Total
Samples/
Sys/Yr
D=B*C
Sample Collection
Labor (per System per Year)
Analysis (in-house
O&M
Total Burden
Analytical Costs per System
Cost (per System per Year)
O&M
Labor
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
(hrs)
(F+H)
(I+J)
E = D*
B from
"Sampling"
F = E*
A from
"Sampling"
G = D*
C from
"Sampling"
H= G*
A from
"Sampling"
I = D*
E from
"Sampling"
J = E+G
K=I
L = F+ H
Total Cost
per System
per Year
M=K+L
Total Annua
Burden
N=A*J
SW Routine Monitoring
Total Annua
O&M Cost
Cost
O=A*M
P=A*K
Labor Cost
Q=A*L
12.0
12.0
24.0
36.0
48.0
88.2
193.4
454.8
1,315.1
6.0
6.0
12.0
18.0
24.0
44.1
193.4
454.8
1315.1
$194.30
$194.30
$388.61
$582.91
$777.22
$1,428.13
$6,263.07
$14,728.24
$42,588.20
2.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
14.7
32.2
75.8
219.2
$64.77
$64.77
$129.54
$194.30
$259.07
$476.04
$1,042.76
$2,454.71
$7,098.57
$267.64
$267.64
$535.28
$802.91
$1,070.55
$1,966.33
$4,313.35
$10,143.35
$29,330.92
8.0
8.0
16.0
24.0
32.0
58.8
225.6
530.6
1534.3
$267.64
$267.64
$535.28
$802.91
$1,070.55
$1,966.33
$4,313.35
$10,143.35
$29,330.92
$259.07
$259.07
$518.14
$777.22
$1,036.29
$1,904.18
$7,305.83
$17,182.95
$49,686.77
$526.71
$526.71
$1,053.42
$1,580.13
$2,106.84
$3,870.51
$11,619.19
$27,326.30
$79,017.69
44,019.6
10,763.3
32,167.4
15,744.0
14,592.0
102,280.5
286,060.8
350,196.0
1,132,313.4
$2,898,192.81
$708,643.98
$2,117,863.23
$1,036,564.85
$960,718.64
$6,732,614.19
$14,733,126.75
$18,035,358.06
$58,315,053.15
$1,472,662.79
$360,084.26
$1,076,152.82
$526,711.15
$488,171.31
$3,420,363.04
$5,469,333.80
$6,694,610.79
$21,646,216.00
$1,425,530.03
$348,559.72
$1,041,710.41
$509,853.70
$472,547.33
$3,312,251.14
$9,263,792.95
$11,340,747.26
$36,668,837.15
2,183.5
2,073.4
$67,144.99
363.9
$11,784.54
$48,697.97
2,437.3
$48,697.97
$78,929.52
$127,627.49
1,988,137.0
$105,538,135.65
$41,154,305.96
$64,383,829.69
C-8
December 2011
Exhibit C.6 - Repeat Monitoring - Burden and Cost
a. Repeat-GW
Size
Category
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations)
14,775
768
666
153
105
345
210
81
15
Repeat
Samples/
System
B = Q from
"Sampling"
4
4
3
4.5
6
5.4
11.7
11.1
27
17,118
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Analytical Costs
Total Burden Cost (per System Per Year)
(per System
O&M
Labor
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
per Year) (hrs)
C = B*
B from
"Sampling"
D = C*
A from
"Sampling"
E=B*
C from
"Sampling"
F = E*
A from
"Sampling"
G = B*
E from
"Sampling"
H=C+E
J=G
K=D+F
Total Cost
(per System
per Year)
L=J+K
Total Number
of Samples
M=A*B
59100
3072
1998
689
630
1863
2457
899
405
2.0
2.0
1.5
2.3
3.0
2.7
11.7
11.1
27.0
$64.77
$64.77
$48.58
$74.48
$97.15
$87.44
$378.89
$359.46
$874.37
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.8
1.0
0.9
2.0
1.9
4.5
$22.67
$22.67
$16.19
$25.91
$32.38
$29.15
$64.77
$61.53
$145.73
$89.21
$89.21
$66.91
$100.36
$133.82
$120.44
$260.95
$247.56
$602.19
2.7
2.7
2.0
3.1
4.0
3.6
13.7
13.0
31.5
$89.21
$89.21
$66.91
$100.36
$133.82
$120.44
$260.95
$247.56
$602.19
$87.44
$87.44
$64.77
$100.39
$129.53
$116.59
$443.66
$420.99
$1,020.10
$176.65
$176.65
$131.68
$200.75
$263.35
$237.03
$704.61
$668.55
$1,622.29
63.3
$2,049.91
13.0
$421.00
$1,710.65
76.3
$1,710.65
$2,470.91
$4,181.56
71,113
Total Annual
Burden
N=A*H
GW Repeat Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
O=A*L
P=A*J
Labor Cost
Q=A*K
39,892.5 $2,610,003.75
2,073.6
$135,667.20
1,332.0
$87,698.88
474.3
$30,714.75
420.0
$27,651.75
1,242.0
$81,775.35
2,877.0
$147,968.10
1,053.0
$54,152.55
472.5
$24,334.35
$1,318,077.75
$68,513.28
$44,562.06
$15,355.08
$14,051.10
$41,551.80
$54,799.50
$20,052.36
$9,032.85
$1,291,926.00
$67,153.92
$43,136.82
$15,359.67
$13,600.65
$40,223.55
$93,168.60
$34,100.19
$15,301.50
49,836.9 $3,199,966.68
$1,585,995.78
$1,613,970.90
Note: Systems with TC-positive samples are required to take 4 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample if they serve 1,000 people or fewer. Larger systems must take 3 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample.
b. Repeat-SW
Size
Category
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations)
243
54
138
54
30
186
186
51
33
Repeat
Samples/
System
B = Q from
"Sampling"
975
4
4
3
4.5
6
5.4
12
11.4
33
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Analytical Costs
Total Burden Cost (per System Per Year)
(per System
O&M
Labor
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
per Year) (hrs)
C = B*
B from
"Sampling"
D = C*
A from
"Sampling"
E=B*
C from
"Sampling"
F = E*
A from
"Sampling"
G = B*
E from
"Sampling"
H=C+E
J=G
K=D+F
Total Cost
(per System
per Year)
L=J+K
Total Number
of Samples
M=A*B
972
216
414
243
180
1004
2232
581
1089
2.0
2.0
1.5
2.3
3.0
2.7
12.0
11.4
33.0
$64.77
$64.77
$48.58
$74.48
$97.15
$87.44
$388.61
$369.18
$1,068.67
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.8
1.0
0.9
2.0
1.9
5.5
$22.67
$22.67
$16.19
$25.91
$32.38
$29.15
$64.77
$61.53
$178.11
$89.21
$89.21
$66.91
$100.36
$133.82
$120.44
$267.64
$254.26
$736.00
2.7
2.7
2.0
3.1
4.0
3.6
14.0
13.3
38.5
$89.21
$89.21
$66.91
$100.36
$133.82
$120.44
$267.64
$254.26
$736.00
$87.44
$87.44
$64.77
$100.39
$129.53
$116.59
$453.38
$430.71
$1,246.78
$176.65
$176.65
$131.68
$200.75
$263.35
$237.03
$721.02
$684.97
$1,982.78
69.9
$2,263.65
14.0
$453.38
$1,857.85
83.9
$1,857.85
$2,717.03
$4,574.88
6,932
Total Annual
Burden
N=A*H
SW Repeat Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
(C x R)
O=A*L
P=A*J
Labor Cost
(C x S)
Q=A*K
656.1
145.8
276.0
167.4
120.0
669.6
2,604.0
678.3
1,270.5
$42,925.95
$9,539.10
$18,171.84
$10,840.50
$7,900.50
$44,087.58
$134,109.72
$34,933.47
$65,431.74
$21,678.03
$4,817.34
$9,233.58
$5,419.44
$4,014.60
$22,401.84
$49,781.04
$12,967.26
$24,288.00
$21,247.92
$4,721.76
$8,938.26
$5,421.06
$3,885.90
$21,685.74
$84,328.68
$21,966.21
$41,143.74
6,587.7
$367,940.40
$154,601.13
$213,339.27
Note: Systems with TC-positive samples are required to take 4 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample if they serve 1,000 people or fewer. Larger systems must take 3 repeat samples for each TC-positive sample.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C-9
December 2011
Exhibit C.7 - Fecal / E.coli Monitoring - Burden and Cost
a. Fecal/E. Coli - GW
Size
Category
PWSs
A (from
"Systems with
Violations")
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
14,775
768
666
153
105
345
210
81
15
Total
17,118
TC+
Samples/
System
B=P+S
(both from
"Sampling")
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.6
3.5
3.2
6.8
6.5
11.7
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total Cost
Analytical Costs (per System
O&M
Labor
(per System
Materials
per Year) (hrs)
per Year)
G=B*
H=C+E
I=G
J=D+F
K=I+J
H (from
"Sampling")
Total Annual
Burden
L=A*H
GW Fecal/E. coli Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
M=A*K
N=A*I
Labor Cost
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
C=B*
B (from
"Sampling")
D=C*
A (from
"Sampling")
E=B*
C (from
"Sampling")
F=E*
A (from
"Sampling")
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.8
1.6
6.8
6.5
11.7
$48.58
$48.58
$42.10
$42.10
$58.29
$51.81
$220.21
$210.50
$378.89
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.5
1.1
1.1
2.0
$16.19
$16.19
$12.95
$12.95
$19.43
$16.19
$35.62
$35.62
$64.77
$66.91
$66.91
$55.76
$57.99
$78.06
$71.37
$151.66
$144.97
$260.95
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
2.4
2.1
7.9
7.6
13.7
$66.91
$66.91
$55.76
$57.99
$78.06
$71.37
$151.66
$144.97
$260.95
$64.77
$64.77
$55.05
$55.05
$77.72
$68.00
$255.83
$246.12
$443.66
$131.68
$131.68
$110.81
$113.04
$155.78
$139.37
$407.49
$391.09
$704.61
29,550.0
1,536.0
1,132.2
260.1
252.0
724.5
1,659.0
615.6
205.5
$1,945,572.00
$101,130.24
$73,799.46
$17,295.12
$16,356.90
$48,082.65
$85,572.90
$31,678.29
$10,569.15
$988,595.25
$51,386.88
$37,136.16
$8,872.47
$8,196.30
$24,622.65
$31,848.60
$11,742.57
$3,914.25
$956,976.75
$49,743.36
$36,663.30
$8,422.65
$8,160.60
$23,460.00
$53,724.30
$19,935.72
$6,654.90
34.0
$1,101.06
7.1
$229.91
$954.58
41.1
$954.58
$1,330.97
$2,285.55
35,934.9
$2,330,056.71
$1,166,315.13
$1,163,741.58
O=A*J
Each system with a TC-positive sample must check that sample for fecal coliform or E. coli.
b. Fecal/E. Coli - SW
Size
Category
PWSs
A (from
"Systems with
Violations")
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
243
54
138
54
30
186
186
51
33
Total
975
TC+
Samples/
System
B=P+S
(both from
"Sampling")
3.0
3.0
2.5
2.6
3.5
3.2
7.0
6.7
14.3
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Total
Cost (per System per Year) Total Cost
Analytical Costs (per System
O&M
Labor
(per System
Materials
per Year) (hrs)
per Year)
G=B*
H=C+E
I=G
J=D+F
K=I+J
H (from
"Sampling")
Total Annual
Burden
L=A*H
SW Fecal/E. coli Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
M=A*K
N=A*I
Labor Cost
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
C=B*
B (from
"Sampling")
D=C*
A (from
"Sampling")
E=B*
C (from
"Sampling")
F=E*
A (from
"Sampling")
1.5
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.8
1.6
7.0
6.7
14.3
$48.58
$48.58
$42.10
$42.10
$58.29
$51.81
$226.69
$216.97
$463.09
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.6
0.5
1.2
1.1
2.4
$16.19
$16.19
$12.95
$12.95
$19.43
$16.19
$38.86
$35.62
$77.72
$66.91
$66.91
$55.76
$57.99
$78.06
$71.37
$156.12
$149.43
$318.94
2.0
2.0
1.7
1.7
2.4
2.1
8.2
7.8
16.7
$66.91
$66.91
$55.76
$57.99
$78.06
$71.37
$156.12
$149.43
$318.94
$64.77
$64.77
$55.05
$55.05
$77.72
$68.00
$265.55
$252.59
$540.81
$131.68
$131.68
$110.81
$113.04
$155.78
$139.37
$421.67
$402.02
$859.75
486.0
108.0
234.6
91.8
72.0
390.6
1,525.2
397.8
551.1
$31,998.24
$7,110.72
$15,291.78
$6,104.16
$4,673.40
$25,922.82
$78,430.62
$20,503.02
$28,371.75
$16,259.13
$3,613.14
$7,694.88
$3,131.46
$2,341.80
$13,274.82
$29,038.32
$7,620.93
$10,525.02
$15,739.11
$3,497.58
$7,596.90
$2,972.70
$2,331.60
$12,648.00
$49,392.30
$12,882.09
$17,846.73
37.0
$1,198.21
7.6
$246.10
$1,021.49
44.6
$1,021.49
$1,444.31
$2,465.80
3,857.1
$218,406.51
$93,499.50
$124,907.01
O=A*J
Each system with a TC-positive sample must check that sample for fecal coliform or E. coli.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C - 10
December 2011
Exhibit C.8 - Additional Routine Monitoring - Burden and Cost
a. Additional Routines - GW
Size
Category
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations")
14,775
768
666
153
105
345
210
81
15
Total
17,118
TC+
Samples/
System
B = N (from
"Sampling")
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Analytical Costs
Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total Cost
(per System
O&M
Labor
(per System
per Year) (hrs)
per Year)
H=C+E
I=G
J=D+F
K=I+J
Total Annual
Burden
L=A*H
GW Addtl Routine Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
M=A*K
N=A*I
Labor Cost
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
C=B*
B (from
"Sampling")
D=C*
A (from
"Sampling")
E=B*
C (from
"Sampling")
F=E*
A (from
"Sampling")
G=B*
E (from
"Sampling")
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$64.77
$64.77
$48.58
$32.38
$16.19
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$22.67
$22.67
$16.19
$9.72
$6.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$89.21
$89.21
$66.91
$44.61
$22.30
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2.7
2.7
2.0
1.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$89.21
$89.21
$66.91
$44.61
$22.30
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$87.44
$87.44
$64.77
$42.10
$22.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$176.65
$176.65
$131.68
$86.71
$44.97
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
39,892.5
2,073.6
1,332.0
198.9
73.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$2,610,003.75
$135,667.20
$87,698.88
$13,266.63
$4,721.85
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,318,077.75
$68,513.28
$44,562.06
$6,825.33
$2,341.50
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,291,926.00
$67,153.92
$43,136.82
$6,441.30
$2,380.35
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
7.0
$226.69
2.4
$77.73
$312.24
9.4
$312.24
$304.42
$616.66
43,570.5
$2,851,358.31
$1,440,319.92
$1,411,038.39
4.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
O=A*J
Systems that collect fewer than 5 routine samples per month must collect 5 routine samples the month following a TC-positive sample. Depending on system size, systems will be required to take 1-4 additional routine samples to bring the total to 5 samples.
b. Additional Routines - SW
Size
Category
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
PWSs
A (from
"Systems
with
Violations")
243
54
138
54
30
186
186
51
33
TC+
Samples/
System
B = N (from
"Sampling")
975
4.0
4.0
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Labor (per System per Year)
Sample Collection
Analysis (in-house)
O&M
Analytical Costs
Total Burden Cost (per System per Year) Total Cost
(per System
O&M
Labor
(per System
per Year) (hrs)
per Year)
H=C+E
I=G
J=D+F
K=I+J
Total Annual
Burden
L=A*H
SW Addtl Routine Monitoring
Total Annual
O&M Cost
Cost
M=A*K
N=A*I
Labor Cost
(hrs)
(cost)
(hrs)
(cost)
Materials
C=B*
B (from
"Sampling")
D=C*
A (from
"Sampling")
E=B*
C (from
"Sampling")
F=E*
A (from
"Sampling")
G=B*
E (from
"Sampling")
2.0
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$64.77
$64.77
$48.58
$32.38
$16.19
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
0.7
0.7
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$22.67
$22.67
$16.19
$9.72
$6.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$89.21
$89.21
$66.91
$44.61
$22.30
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
2.7
2.7
2.0
1.3
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$89.21
$89.21
$66.91
$44.61
$22.30
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$87.44
$87.44
$64.77
$42.10
$22.67
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$176.65
$176.65
$131.68
$86.71
$44.97
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
656.1
145.8
276.0
70.2
21.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
$42,925.95
$9,539.10
$18,171.84
$4,682.34
$1,349.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21,678.03
$4,817.34
$9,233.58
$2,408.94
$669.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$21,247.92
$4,721.76
$8,938.26
$2,273.40
$680.10
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
7.0
$226.69
2.4
$77.73
$312.24
9.4
$312.24
$304.42
$616.66
1,169.1
$76,668.33
$38,806.89
$37,861.44
O=A*J
Systems that collect fewer than 5 routine samples per month must collect 5 routine samples the month following a TC-positive sample. Depending on system size, systems will be required to take 1-4 additional routine samples to bring the total to 5 samples.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C - 11
December 2011
Exhibit C.9 - System Responses - Monitoring Events
Routine Monitoring
Population
Range
<25-500 - TC+*
<25-500 - rest
501-1K - TC+*
501-1K - rest
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Inventory of
Public Water Systems
GW*
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C=A+B
(from M of
(from N of
"Systems with "Systems with
Violations")
Violations")
14,775
104,246
768
7,319
5,790
1,236
786
2,122
977
361
225
243
5,259
54
1,291
2,010
656
456
1,739
1,268
660
738
15,018
109,505
822
8,610
7,800
1,892
1,242
3,861
2,245
1,021
963
138,603
14,376
152,979
Samples per
System per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
D
E
(from J or K of ((from J or K of
"Sampling" * L "Sampling" * L
from
from
"Sampling)
"Sampling))
12
12
4
12
12
12
4
12
24
24
36
36
48
48
85
88
188
193
447
455
1081
1315
Number of Responses
Routine Monitoring Events per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
F=A*D
G=B*E
H=F+G
177,300
416,982
9,216
29,274
138,949
44,496
37,728
180,728
183,218
161,233
243,243
2,916
63,113
648
15,497
48,251
23,616
21,888
153,358
245,227
300,164
970,545
180,216
480,096
9,864
44,771
187,200
68,112
59,616
334,086
428,445
461,398
1,213,789
1,622,367
1,845,224
3,467,591
* GW CWSs with TC+ results sample monthly.
Repeat Monitoring
Population
Range
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
Frequency of
Monitoring per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
D
E
(from Q of
(from Q of
"Sampling")
"Sampling")
Inventory of
Public Water Systems
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C=A+B
(from P of
(from Q of
"Systems with "Systems with
Violations")
Violations")
14,775
768
666
153
105
345
210
81
15
243
54
138
54
30
186
186
51
33
15,018
822
804
207
135
531
396
132
48
17,118
975
18,093
C - 12
4
4
3
4.5
6
5.4
11.7
11.1
27
4
4
3
4.5
6
5.4
12
11.4
33
Number of Responses
Repeat Monitoring Events per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
F=A*D
G=B*E
H=F+G
59,100
3,072
1,998
689
630
1,863
2,457
899
405
972
216
414
243
180
1,004
2,232
581
1,089
60,072
3,288
2,412
932
810
2,867
4,689
1,481
1,494
71,113
6,932
78,044
December 2011
Exhibit C.9 continued - System Responses - Monitoring Events
Fecal - E. coli Monitoring
Population
Range
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Frequency of
Monitoring per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
D
E
(from P + S of (from P + S of
"Sampling")
"Sampling")
Inventory of
Public Water Systems
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C=A+B
(from P of
(from Q of
"Systems with "Systems with
Violations")
Violations")
14,775
768
666
153
105
345
210
81
15
243
54
138
54
30
186
186
51
33
15,018
822
804
207
135
531
396
132
48
17,118
975
18,093
3
3
2.5
2.6
3.5
3.2
6.8
6.5
11.7
3
3
2.5
2.6
3.5
3.2
7
6.7
14.3
Number of Responses
E. coli Monitoring Events per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
F=A*D
G=B*E
H=F+G
44,325
2,304
1,665
398
368
1,104
1,428
527
176
729
162
345
140
105
595
1,302
342
472
45,054
2,466
2,010
538
473
1,699
2,730
868
647
52,293
4,192
56,486
Additional Routine Monitoring
Population
Range
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
4,101-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
Over 50K
Total
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
Frequency of
Monitoring per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
D
E
(from N of
(from N of
"Sampling")
"Sampling")
Inventory of
Public Water Systems
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
A
B
C=A+B
(from P of
(from Q of
"Systems with "Systems with
Violations")
Violations")
14,775
768
666
153
105
345
210
81
15
243
54
138
54
30
186
186
51
33
15,018
822
804
207
135
531
396
132
48
17,118
975
18,093
C - 13
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
Number of Responses
Add'l Routine Monitoring Events per Year
GW
SW/GUDI
Total
F=A*D
G=B*E
H=F+G
4
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
59,100
3,072
1,998
306
105
0
0
0
0
972
216
414
108
30
0
0
0
0
60,072
3,288
2,412
414
135
0
0
0
0
64,581
1,740
66,321
December 2011
Exhibit C.10 - Total Burden and Cost for TCR
System TCR Totals
Monitoring
GW
Total Burden in Hours
SW
Total
GW
Total Cost
SW
Total
GW
O&M Cost
SW
Total
GW
Labor Cost
SW
Routine
1,379,160.1
1,988,137.0
3,367,297.1
$80,846,621.23
$105,538,135.65
$186,384,756.89
$36,183,901.44
$41,154,305.96
$77,338,207.40
$44,662,719.79
$64,383,829.69
Total
$109,046,549.48
Repeat
49,836.9
6,587.7
56,424.6
$3,199,966.68
$367,940.40
$3,567,907.08
$1,585,995.78
$154,601.13
$1,740,596.91
$1,613,970.90
$213,339.27
$1,827,310.17
Fecal/E. coli
35,934.9
3,857.1
39,792.0
$2,330,056.71
$218,406.51
$2,548,463.22
$1,166,315.13
$93,499.50
$1,259,814.63
$1,163,741.58
$124,907.01
$1,288,648.59
Addtl Routine
43,570.5
1,169.1
44,739.6
$2,851,358.31
$76,668.33
$2,928,026.64
$1,440,319.92
$38,806.89
$1,479,126.81
$1,411,038.39
$37,861.44
$1,448,899.83
1,508,502.4
1,999,750.9
3,508,253.3
$89,228,002.93
$106,201,150.89
$195,429,153.83
$40,376,532.27
$41,441,213.48
$81,817,745.75
$48,851,470.66
$64,759,937.41
$113,611,408.07
Total
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C - 14
December 2011
Exhibit C.11 - Sanitary Surveys - State Burden and Cost
A. Community Water Systems
Size
Category
Inventory of
GW Systems
A
(from "Inventory
of Systems with
Violations")
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
25,388
4,463
4,583
1,111
717
Total
36,261
Unit Burden for
SSurvey
B
12
24
24
24
36
Unit Labor
Cost
C=B*
State Labor
Rate
$
$
$
$
$
GW CWSs
Systems w SSurveys
Annual %
D
525.50
1,051.01
1,051.01
1,051.01
1,576.51
GW CWS Total
Annual
Annual
Burden
Cost
F=B*E
G=C*E
Sys
E=A*D
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
0
$
-
Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
B. Nontransient Noncommunity Systems
Size
Category
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
Total
Inventory of
GW Systems
A
(from "Inventory
of Systems with
Violations")
15,038
1,659
685
79
46
Unit Burden for
SSurvey
B
12
24
24
24
36
GW NTNCWSs
Unit Labor
Systems w SSurveys
Cost
Annual %
C=B*
D
State Labor
Rate
$
$
$
$
$
525.50
1,051.01
1,051.01
1,051.01
1,576.51
17,507
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
GW NTNC Total
Annual
Annual
Burden
Cost
F=B*E
G=C*E
Sys
E=A*D
-
0
0
0
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
0
$
-
Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C - 15
December 2011
Sanitary Surveys - Burden and Cost (Continued)
C. Transient Noncommunity Systems
Size
Category
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
Total
Inventory of
GW Systems
A
(from "Inventory
of Systems with
Violations")
78,595
1,965
522
46
23
Unit Burden for
SSurvey
B
12
24
24
24
36
Unit Labor
Cost
C=B*
State Labor
Rate
$
$
$
$
$
GW TNCWSs
Systems w Surveys
Annual %
D
525.50
1,051.01
1,051.01
1,051.01
1,576.51
81,151
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
GW TNC Total
Annual
Annual
Burden
Cost
F=B*E
G=C*E
Sys
E=A*D
-
0
0
0
0
0
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
0
$
-
Note: Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
D. Totals
Size
Category
Total
Annual
Burden
H
Total
Annual
Cost
I
Total
Annual
Responses
J
<25-500
501-1K
1,001-2.5K
2,501-3.3K
3,301-4.1K
-
$
$
$
$
$
-
-
Total
-
$
-
-
Note: Burden for sanitary surveys is now accounted for under the Ground Water Rule.
Microbial Rules ICR - TCR
C - 16
December 2011
Exhibit C.12
Total Coliform Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
No changes in burden estimates based on December 2011 consultations.
Microbial Rules ICR - Total Coliform Rule
C - 17
December 2011
Appendix D
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment
Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit D.1a - IESWTR PWS Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Annual
Respondents
Turbidity Monitoring
Exception Reports and
Individual Filter
Assessments (IFAs)
Totals
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
1,376
3,781,232
4,276,458
$
138,488,817
$
165
165
4,127
$
133,656
$
1,376
3,781,397
4,280,585
$
138,622,473
$
16,938,278
16,938,278
Annual Capital Cost
$
$
$
15,822,633
15,822,633
Exhibit D.1b - IESWTR State Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Annual
Respondents
Avg. Annual
Responses
Annual
Burden
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M
Cost
Annual Capital Cost
Turbidity Monitoring
57
66,035
445,739
$
19,519,815
$
-
$
-
Exception Reports and
Comprehensive
Performance Evaluations
(CPEs)
57
151
7,154
$
313,281
$
-
$
-
Sanitary Surveys
57
4,432
495,015
$
21,677,693
$
-
$
-
57
70,619
947,908
$
41,510,789
$
-
$
-
Total
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D-1
December 2011
Exhibit D.2 - IESWTR System Inventory
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
>1M
Total
Surface Water
and GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
987
2,150
1,171
2,521
2,149
1,920
393
325
18
11,635
257
264
86
75
29
6
1
1
0
719
1,345
500
86
63
24
2
1
2,021
Non-Purchased Surface
Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
A
B
C
416
121
631
644
150
376
348
50
63
948
34
50
1,011
7
17
975
1
225
237
17
0
4,822
363
1,138
Unfiltered Surface
Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
D
E
F
1
4
2
1
5
1
1
15
-
3
3
Filtered Non-Purchased Surface
Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
G=A-D
H=B-E
I=C-F
415
121
628
640
150
376
346
50
63
947
34
50
1,011
7
17
970
1
224
237
16
4,807
363
1,135
Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size
category.
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D-2
December 2011
Exhibit D.3 - Systems and Plants Subject to IESWTR Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Requirements
(Practicing Conventional or Direct Filtration)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Filtered Non-Purchased
Surface Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
A
B
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
601
1
369
141
83
210
27
16
-
% Using Conventional or
Direct Filtration
CWS
NTNC
TNC
D
E
F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
93.9%
93.9%
93.9%
93.9%
93.9%
93.9%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
98.5%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
96.0%
Total Systems Subject to
IESWTR Individual Filter
Turbidity Monitoring
CWS
NTNC
TNC
G=A*D
H=B*E
I=C*F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
565
1
347
139
82
202
26
15
-
Plants Per System
CWS
NTNC
TNC
J
K
L
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.08
1.00
1.00
1.08
1.00
1.00
1.35
1.00
1.00
1.35
1.00
1.00
1.69
1.00
1.00
1.69
1.00
1.00
1.69
1.00
1.00
Total Plants Subject to
IESWTR Individual Filter
Turbidity Monitoring
CWS
NTNC
TNC
M=G*J
N=H*K
O=I*L
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
610
1
375
187
110
340
44
26
-
Total
1,447
1
1,375
1
1,692
1
Note: IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people. Percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration was
assumed to apply to NTNCWSs and TNCWSs. Percentage of systems using conventional or direct filtration was not available. Percentage of plants was used as a proxy.
-
Source: Number of plants per system (for CWSs) and percentage of plants using conventional or direct filtration are from 2006 CWSS.
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D-3
December 2011
Exhibit D.4 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs - PWSs
Number of Conventional and
Direct Filtration Systems (SW
and GWUDI)
Population
Category
Hourly
Labor
Rate
A
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
CWS
B
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
565
347
139
82
202
26
15
NTNC
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
-
TNC
D
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
Number of Conventional
and Direct Filtration
Plants
(SW and GWUDI)
CWS
E
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
610
375
187
110
340
44
26
NTNC
F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
-
TNC
G
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
Plant Level Burden
Data
Data Review
Data
RecordkeepCollection Data Collection Data Review
Annual
Reporting Unit Data Reporting
ing Unit
Unit Burden Annual Burden Unit Burden
Burden
Burden
Annual Burden
Burden
(hours)
(hours)
(hours)
(hours)
(hours)
(hours)
(hours)
H
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I=H*365
days/yr
*3 times/day
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1,095
1,095
1,095
1,095
1,095
1,095
1,095
J
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
K=J*365
days/yr
*3 times/day
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1,095
1,095
1,095
1,095
1,095
1,095
1,095
L
M=L*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Total
1,375
1
- 1,692
1
Note:
IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people.
Sources:
(H, J) These activities occur three times per day on a daily basis.
(H, J, L, N, P, R) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(M, O, Q, S) These activities occur monthly.
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
120
120
120
120
120
120
120
N
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
System Level Labor Hours
Develop
RecordkeepData Review Summary
Develop
ing Annual Data Review
Annual
Report Unit
Summary
Burden
Unit Burden
Burden
Burden
Report Annual
(hours)
(hours)
(hours)
(hours)
Burden (hours)
O=N*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
P
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
Q=P*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
R
S=R*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
Total Annual
Burden (hours)
T=[(E+F+G)
*(I+K+M+O)]
+[(A+B+C)*(Q+S)]
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1,557,095
954,542
470,571
277,003
844,355
108,560
64,332
4,276,458
D-4
Total Annual
Labor Cost
U=T*A
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50,424,968
30,911,901
15,238,978
8,970,462
27,343,584
3,515,604
2,083,321
$ 138,488,817
December 2011
Exhibit D.5 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring O&M and Capital Costs - PWSs
Number of Conventional
and Direct Filtration
Systems
Flows
(SW and GWUDI)
(Millions of Gallons per Day)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Total
CWS
A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
565
347
139
82
202
26
15
1,375
NTNC
B
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
1
TNC
Avg Flow
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
D
O&M Unit Costs for
Capital Unit Costs for
Continuous Monitoring
Continuous Monitoring
(cents per thousand Annual O&M Costs for Continuous (cents per thousand
Design Flow
Monitoring (dollars/yr)
gallons)
gallons)
E
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
4
8
14
27
78
299
G=(A+B+C)*D*F
*(1,000 kgal/Mgal)
*(1 dollar/100 cents)
*(365 days/yr)
F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
9
20
33
60
164
594
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.377
0.317
0.320
0.316
0.322
0.150
0.128
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,781,487
1,716,892
1,325,451
1,343,908
6,509,500
1,111,029
2,150,010
$
16,938,278
Annual Capital Costs for
Continuous Monitoring
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
I=[(A+B+C)*E*H
*(1,000 kgal/Mgal)
*(1 dollar/100 cents)
*(365 days/yr)]/
7 years
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
3,174,083
1,748,699
1,356,655
1,177,442
5,048,585
1,705,738
1,611,432
$
15,822,633
H
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.295
1.088
0.927
0.837
0.805
0.771
0.338
Note:
IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people.
Sources:
(D, E) Average and design flow information is from the 2006 CWSS. This data includes both surface water and groundwater sources, and thus potentially over estimate daily flows.
(F, H) IESWTR RIA (1998), Appendix C. Updated to 2010$.
(I) Assumes turbidimeters are replaced once every 7 years.
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D-5
December 2011
Exhibit D.6 - Exceptions Reporting and Individual Filter Assessment Burden and Costs - PWSs
Number of Conventional
and Direct Filtration
Percent of Systems
Systems
(SW and GWUDI)
Performing Each Year
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Hourly
Labor
Rate
A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
CWS NTNC
B
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
565
1
347
139
82
202
26
15
-
TNC
D
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
Exception
Reports
E
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
Annual Number of Systems
Performing Each Activity
Labor Hours/Report
Exception
Exception
IFAs
Reports
IFAs
Reports
F
G=(B+C+D)*E H=(B+C+D)*F
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2%
57
11
20
2%
35
7
20
2%
14
3
20
2%
8
2
20
2%
20
4
20
2%
3
1
20
2%
2
0
20
Total Annual
Burden
IFAs
J
K=(G*I)+(J*H)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
50
1,697
50
1,040
50
417
50
245
50
605
50
78
50
46
Total Annual
Labor Cost
L=K*A
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
54,943
33,678
13,492
7,942
19,589
2,519
1,493
Total
1,375
1
138
28
4,127 $
133,656
Notes:
(E) Exception reports are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 0.5 or 1 NTU in consecutive measurements in individual filters (absent such exceedances,
systems need only report that they have completed monitoring). IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000
people.
(F) Individual filter assessments are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 1 NTU during 3 consecutive months. IESWTR individual filter turbidity monitoring
requirements apply only to systems serving more than 10,000 people.
(I, J) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D-6
December 2011
Exhibit D.7 - Individual Filter Turbidity Monitoring Burden and Costs - States
Number of Conventional and
Direct Filtration Systems
(SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
Hourly
Labor
Rate
A
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
CWS
B
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
565
347
139
82
202
26
15
NTNC
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
-
TNC
D
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
Compliance
Compliance
Analyze/Review
Tracking Unit Tracking Annual Data Unit Burden
Burden (hours) Burden (hours)
(hours)
E
F=E*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
G
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
State Level Labor Hours/System
Analyze/Review
Determinations
Make Determinations
Data Annual
Unit Burden
Annual Burden (As
Burden (hours)
(hours)
Required) (hours)
H=G*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
I
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
108
108
108
108
108
108
108
Total
1,375
1
Notes:
(E, G, I, K) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives (including states).
(F, H, J, L) These activities occur monthly.
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D-7
J=I*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
96
96
96
96
96
96
96
Recordkeeping
Unit Burden
(hours)
Recordkeeping
Annual Burden
(hours)
K
L=K*12
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
Total
Annual
Burden
(hours)
M=(B+C+D)*
(F+H+J+L)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
183,235
112,315
44,995
26,487
65,330
8,400
4,978
Total Annual
Labor Cost
N=M*A
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
8,024,218
4,918,499
1,970,443
1,159,906
2,860,938
367,835
217,976
445,739 $
19,519,815
December 2011
Exhibit D.8 - Exceptions Reporting and Comprehensive Performance Evaluation Burden and Costs - States
Number of Conventional
Percent of Systems
and Direct Filtration
Requiring Activity Each
Systems
(SW and GWUDI)
Year
Population
Category
Hourly
Labor
Rate
A
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
CWS
B
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
565
347
139
82
202
26
15
NTNC
C
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1
-
TNC
D
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
-
Exception
Reports
CPEs
E
F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
10%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
1%
Annual Number of Systems
Requiring Activity
Exception
Reports
CPEs
G=(B+C+D)*E H=(B+C+D)*F
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
57
6
35
3
14
1
8
1
20
2
3
0
2
0
Unit Burden
Exception
Reports
CPEs
I
J
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
Total Annual
Burden
Total Annual
Labor Cost
K=(G*I)+(J*H)
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,941
1,803
722
425
1,049
135
80
L=K*A
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
128,784
78,939
31,624
18,616
45,916
5,904
3,498
Total
1,375
1
138
14
7,154 $
313,281
Notes:
(E) Exception reports are required when systems exceed turbidity levels of 0.5 or 1 NTU in consecutive measurements in individual filters (absent such exceedances, systems
need only report that they have completed monitoring).
(F) Comprehensive performance evaluations are performed by states when a system exceeds 2 NTU in two consecutive measurements in an individual filter in each of two
consecutive months.
(I, J) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives (including states).
Source:
(E, F) IESWTR ICR (1998)
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D-8
December 2011
Exhibit D.9 - Sanitary Surveys - State Burden and Costs
Number Filtered Systems
(SW and GWUDI)
Population
Category
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-4,400
4,401-10K
10,001-25K
25,001-50K
50,001-75K
75,001-100K
100,001-500K
500,001-1M
>1M
Hourly
Labor
Rate
A
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
CWS
NTNC
B
C
987
257
2,150
264
1,171
86
2,521
75
475
6
1,674
23
1,204
4
716
2
265
1
128
0
290
1
35
0
18 0
TNC
D
1,345
500
86
63
5
19
1
1
1
Number of Unfiltered
Systems (SW and
GWUDI)
CWS
E
1
4
2
1
3
2
1
0
1
NTNC
F
-
TNC
G
3
-
Percent of Surveys
Performed Annually
Total Surveys Annually
Unfiltered
CWS
All NCWSs Filtered Systems
Systems
H
I
J=(B*H)+((C+D)*I) K=(E*H)+((F+G)*I)
33.3%
20.0%
649
0.9
33.3%
20.0%
869
1.3
33.3%
20.0%
425
0.7
33.3%
20.0%
868
0.3
33.3%
20.0%
161
33.3%
20.0%
566
33.3%
20.0%
402
1.0
33.3%
20.0%
239
0.6
33.3%
20.0%
89
0.2
33.3%
20.0%
43
0.1
33.3%
20.0%
97
33.3%
20.0%
12
33.3%
20.0%
6
0.3
Sanitary Survey Unit
Burden (hours)
Filtered
Systems
L
16
16
28
28
40
65
65
391
705
1,034
1,364
1,689
2,008
Unfiltered
Systems
M
16
16
28
28
40
40
40
194
334
485
638
786
1,004
Total Labor
Hours/Year
N=(L*J)+(M*K)
10,405
13,932
11,915
24,315
6,427
36,816
26,190
93,693
62,510
44,142
131,903
19,981
12,784
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total Labor
Cost/Year
O=N*A
455,637
610,126
521,785
1,064,820
281,468
1,612,232
1,146,922
4,103,025
2,737,436
1,933,080
5,776,303
875,012
559,849
Total
11,635
719
2,021
15
3
4,426
5.6
495,015 $
21,677,693
Note:
All SW/GWUDI systems must undergo surveys (other requirements of the IESWTR are assumed to apply to non-purchased SW/GWUDI systems).
(L, M) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives (including states).
Source:
(H, I) Percentage of systems undergoing surveys annually is based on IESWTR requirements. Community water systems must undergo a sanitary survey at least every 3 years and non-community water systems mus
undergo a sanitary survey at least every 5 years.
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D-9
December 2011
Exhibit D.10
Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule - Summary of Original
and Revised Burden Estimates
No changes in burden estimates based on December 2011 consultations.
Microbial Rules ICR - IESWTR
D - 10
December 2011
Appendix E
Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit E1
LT1ESWTR Burden and Cost Summary by Activity
Exhibit E1a
LT1ESWTR PWS Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions
Reporting
Individual Filter
Assessments
Total
Annual
Respondents
2,770
Avg. Annual
Responses
321,373
Annual
Burden
128,860
499
499
3,990
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M Cost Annual Capital Cost Total Annual Cost
$
4,173,012 $
2,894,136 $
2,265,732 $
9,332,880
$
129,204
$
111
111
5,541
$
179,450
$
2,770
321,982
138,391
$
4,481,665
$
-
$
-
$
2,894,136
$
2,265,732
$
129,204
$
179,450
$
9,641,533
Exhibit E1b
LT1ESWTR State Burden and Cost Summary
Requirement
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions
Reporting
Total
Annual
Respondents
57
Avg. Annual
Responses
66,491
Annual
Burden
99,736
Annual Burden
(Labor) Cost
Annual O&M Cost Annual Capital Cost Total Annual Cost
$
4,367,656 $
$
$
4,367,656
57
554
19,501
$
853,971
$
-
$
-
$
853,971
57
67,045
119,237
$
5,221,626
$
-
$
-
$
5,221,626
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E-1
December 2011
Exhibit E2
Summary of the LT1 Burden, Respondents, Responses, and
Costs for the ICR Approval Period by Year and Annual Averages
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Burden (hours)
F5.4
Year 1
Year 2
Annual Average
Year 3
Three Year Total
138,391
138,391
138,391
138,391
415,174
Respondents (number) [2]
F7
2,770
2,770
2,770
2,770
2,770
Responses (number)
F8
321,982
321,982
321,982
321,982
965,947
Costs (labor)
F3.4
$ 4,481,665
$ 4,481,665
$ 4,481,665
$
4,481,665
$
13,444,995
Costs (Turbidimeter Capital)
F3.4
$ 2,265,732
$ 2,265,732
$ 2,265,732
$
2,265,732
$
6,797,196
Costs (Turbidimeter O&M)
F3.4
$ 2,894,136 $ 2,894,136 $ 2,894,136
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
$
2,894,136
$
8,682,408
States
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Year 1
Year 2
Annual Average
Year 3
Three Year Total
Burden (hours)
E6
119,237
119,237
119,237
119,237
357,711
Respondents (number)**
E7
57
57
57
57
57
Responses (number)
E8
67,045
67,045
67,045
67,045
201,135
Costs
E4
$ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626 $ 5,221,626
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
5,221,626
$
15,664,879
Annual Average
Three Year Total
257,628
772,885
2,827
2,827
$
14,863,160 $
44,589,479
Total Burden (hours)
Total Respondents (number)
Total Cost for All Activities
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
$
E-2
December 2011
Exhibit E3.1
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year
for Systems Serving 1,000 People or Fewer
PWS Labor
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
E10.1a
E10.1b
E10.1b
Year 1
$
$
$
$
1,492,337
51,991
72,209
1,616,536
Year 2
$
$
$
$
Yearly Labor Total
$
1,616,536 $
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Year 3
Annual Average
1,492,337
51,991
72,209
1,616,536
$
$
$
$
1,492,337
51,991
72,209
1,616,536
$
$
$
$
1,492,337
51,991
72,209
1,616,536
1,616,536
$
1,616,536
$
1,616,536
PWS Capital and O&M
Source
(Exhibit) [3]
Annual
Turbidimeter Capital Cost* [2]
Turbidimeter Annual O&M * [3]
Year 1
$
554,633 $
554,633
$
1,164,729 $
1,164,729
Yearly Total
$
1,719,361 $
1,719,361
[2] Turbidimeter capital cost is averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.
[3] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.1c
E10.1c
Year 2
E-3
Year 3
$
$
$
554,633
1,164,729
1,719,361
Annual Average
$
$
$
554,633
1,164,729
1,719,361
December 2011
Exhibit E3.2
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year
for Systems Serving between 1,001 and 3,300 People
PWS Labor
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
E10.2a
E10.2b
E10.2b
Year 1
$
$
$
$
1,180,342
33,996
47,217
1,261,555
Year 2
Year 3
Annual Average
$
$
$
$
1,180,342
33,996
47,217
1,261,555
$
$
$
$
1,180,342
33,996
47,217
1,261,555
$
$
$
$
1,180,342
33,996
47,217
1,261,555
Yearly Labor Total
$
1,261,555 $
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
1,261,555
$
1,261,555
$
1,261,555
PWS Capital and O&M
Source
(Exhibit)
Annual
Turbidimeter Capital Cost [1]
Turbidimeter Annual O&M [2]
Year 1
$
613,193 $
$
761,484 $
Yearly Total
$
1,374,677 $
[1] Turbidimeter capital cost is averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.
[2] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.2c
E10.2c
E-4
Year 2
613,193
761,484
1,374,677
Year 3
$
$
$
613,193
761,484
1,374,677
Annual Average
$
$
$
613,193
761,484
1,374,677
December 2011
Exhibit E3.3
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year
for Systems Serving between 3,301 and 10,000 People
PWS Labor
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
E10.3a
E10.3b
E10.3b
Year 1
$
$
$
$
1,500,333
43,217
60,024
1,603,574
Year 2
Year 3
Annual Average
$
$
$
$
1,500,333
43,217
60,024
1,603,574
$
$
$
$
1,500,333
43,217
60,024
1,603,574
$
$
$
$
1,500,333
43,217
60,024
1,603,574
Yearly Labor Total
$
1,603,574 $
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
1,603,574
$
1,603,574
$
1,603,574
PWS Capital and O&M
Source
(Exhibit)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Annual Average
Annual
Turbidimeter Capital Cost [1]
Turbidimeter Annual O&M [2]
$
1,097,906 $
$
967,923 $
Yearly Total
$
2,065,829 $
[1] Turbidimeter capital cost is averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.
[2] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.3c
E10.3c
E-5
1,097,906
967,923
2,065,829
$
$
$
1,097,906
967,923
2,065,829
$
$
$
1,097,906
967,923
2,065,829
December 2011
Exhibit E3.4
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year
for All System Sizes
PWS Labor
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Annual Activity Yearly Total
E3.1-E3.3
E3.1-E3.3
E3.1-E3.3
Year 1
$
$
$
$
Year 2
4,173,012
129,204
179,450
4,481,665
Year 3
Annual Average
3 Year Total
$
$
$
$
4,173,012
129,204
179,450
4,481,665
$
$
$
$
4,173,012
129,204
179,450
4,481,665
$
$
$
$
4,173,012
129,204
179,450
4,481,665
$
$
$
$
12,519,035
387,611
538,349
13,444,995
Yearly Labor Total
$
4,481,665 $
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
4,481,665
$
4,481,665
$
4,481,665
$
13,444,995
PWS Capital and O&M
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual
Turbidimeter Capital Cost
Turbidimeter Annual O&M
Year 1
Year 2
$2,265,732
$2,894,136
Yearly Total
$5,159,868
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E3.1-E3.3
E3.1-E3.3
E-6
$2,265,732
$2,894,136
$5,159,868
Year 3
$2,265,732
$2,894,136
$5,159,868
Annual Average
$2,265,732
$2,894,136
$5,159,868
3 Year Total
$6,797,196
$8,682,408
$15,479,604
December 2011
Exhibit E4
Costs for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year for States
Summary Cost Estimates for States and Systems
States
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Annual Activity Yearly Total
E12a
E12b
Year 1
$
$
$
Year 2
4,367,656
853,971
5,221,626
Year 3
Annual Average
3 Year Total
$
$
$
4,367,656
853,971
5,221,626
$
$
$
4,367,656
853,971
5,221,626
$
$
$
4,367,656
853,971
5,221,626
$
$
$
13,102,968
2,561,912
15,664,879
Yearly Total
$
5,221,626 $
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
5,221,626
$
5,221,626
$
5,221,626
$
15,664,879
Summary of Total Year by Year Costs for PWSs and States [1]
Source
(Exhibit) [2]
System Size Category
PWSs Serving < 1,000 People
PWSs Serving 1,001 - 3,300 People
PWSs Serving 3,301 - 10,000 People
PWS Total
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Annual Average
3 Year Total
E3.1
E3.2
E3.3
$
$
$
$
3,335,898
2,636,232
3,669,403
9,641,533
$
$
$
$
3,335,898
2,636,232
3,669,403
9,641,533
$
$
$
$
3,335,898
2,636,232
3,669,403
9,641,533
$
$
$
$
3,335,898
2,636,232
3,669,403
9,641,533
$
$
$
$
10,007,693
7,908,697
11,008,210
28,924,599
E4
$
$
5,221,626
14,863,160
$
$
5,221,626
14,863,160
$
$
5,221,626
14,863,160
$
$
5,221,626
14,863,160
$
$
15,664,879
44,589,479
[1] Include Capital and O&M costs.
[2] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E-7
December 2011
Exhibit E5.1
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
for Systems Serving 1,000 People or Fewer
PWSs Labor
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
Year 2
Year 3
Annual
Average
46,083
1,605
2,230
49,918
46,083
1,605
2,230
49,918
46,083
1,605
2,230
49,918
46,083
1,605
2,230
49,918
Yearly Labor Total
49,918
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
49,918
49,918
49,918
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.1a
E10.1b
E10.1b
Year 1
E-8
December 2011
Exhibit E5.2
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
for Systems Serving between 1,001 and 3,300 People
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
Year 3
36,448
1,050
1,458
38,956
36,448
1,050
1,458
38,956
Yearly Labor Total
38,956
38,956
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
38,956
38,956
E-9
36,448
1,050
1,458
38,956
Year 2
36,448
1,050
1,458
38,956
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E10.2a
E10.2b
E10.2b
Year 1
Annual
Average
December 2011
Exhibit E5.3
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
for Systems Serving between 3,301 and 10,000 People
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
E10.3a
E10.3b
E10.3b
Annual Activity Yearly Labor Total
Year 1
Year 2
46,329
1,335
1,854
46,329
1,335
1,854
49,517
49,517
Yearly Total
49,517
49,517
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 10
Annual
Average
Year 3
46,329
1,335
1,854
49,517
46,329
1,335
1,854
49,517
49,517
49,517
December 2011
Exhibit E5.4
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
for All System Sizes
PWSs
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Monitoring
Annual Activity Yearly Tota
E5.1-E5.3
E5.1-E5.3
E5.1-E5.3
Year 1
128,860
3,990
5,541
138,391
Year 2
128,860
3,990
5,541
138,391
Yearly Total
138,391
138,391
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 11
Year 3
128,860
3,990
5,541
138,391
138,391
Annual
Average
128,860
3,990
5,541
138,391
138,391
3 Year Total
386,581
11,969
16,624
415,174
415,174
December 2011
Exhibit E6
Burden for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity for States
Summary Burden for States and Systems
States
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Annual Activity Yearly Tota
E12a
E12b
Yearly Total
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Annual
Average
3 Year Total
99,736
19,501
119,237
99,736
19,501
119,237
99,736
19,501
119,237
99,736
19,501
119,237
299,209
58,502
357,711
119,237
119,237
119,237
119,237
357,711
Summary of Total Year by Year Burden for PWSs and States
Source
(Exhibit) [1]
System Size Category
PWSs Serving < 1,000 People
PWSs Serving 1,001 - 3,300 People
PWSs Serving 3,301 - 10,000 People
PWS Total
States and Territories
Year 3
Annual
Average
3 Year Total
49,918
38,956
49,517
138,391
119,237
49,918
38,956
49,517
138,391
119,237
149,753
116,868
148,552
415,174
357,711
257,628
257,628
Yearly Total
[1] The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
257,628
257,628
772,885
E6
49,918
38,956
49,517
138,391
119,237
Year 2
49,918
38,956
49,517
138,391
119,237
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E5.1
E5.2
E5.3
Year 1
E - 12
December 2011
Exhibit E7
Respondents for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
PWSs [1]
Respondents
Includes systems performing:
Annual Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assesment
Year 1
2,770
Year 2
2,770
Year 3
2,770
Annual
Average
2,770
2,770
499
111
2,770
499
111
2,770
499
111
2,770
499
111
Year 1
57
Year 2
57
Year 3
57
Annual
Average
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
States [2]
Respondents
Includes States performing:
Annual Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Comprehensive Performance Evaluation
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Year 1
2,770
57
2,827
Year 2
2,770
57
2,827
Year 3
2,770
57
2,827
Annual
Average
2,770
57
2,827
[1] Each PWS is one respondent. One respondent may be involved in more than one activity; however, in
order to avoid double-counting, the maximum number of respondents expected to be involved in the rule
activities annually is assumed to be the number of respondents for that year.
[2] Each state is one respondent.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 13
December 2011
Exhibit E8
Responses for the ICR Approval Period Year by Year by Activity
PWSs [1]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Individual Filter Assessments
Yearly Total
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
321,373
499
111
321,373
499
111
321,373
499
111
321,982
321,982
321,982
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Annual
Average
321,373
499
111
321,982
States [2]
Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Comprehensive Performance Evaluation
Yearly Total
66,491
499
55
66,491
499
55
66,491
499
55
67,045
67,045
67,045
Annual
Average
66,491
499
55
67,045
Sum for PWSs and States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
PWSs
321,982
321,982
321,982
States and Territories
67,045
67,045
67,045
Yearly Total
389,027
389,027
389,027
* The distribution over time is based upon the Compliance Schedule in Exhibit E17.
[1] Each PWS is one respondent. Each activity detailed in Exhibits E3-E5 is a response.
[2] Each state is one respondent. Each activity detailed in Exhibits E3-E5 is a response.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 14
Annual
Average
321,982
67,045
389,027
December 2011
Exhibit E9
PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Start-up Activities
for Systems Serving 1,000 People or Fewer
Disinfection Benchmark Labor for Systems Serving 1,000 or Less (Filtered & Unfiltered Systems)
Activity
Submit Profiling Notification to State
Data Entry and Spreadsheet Development
Data Review
Generate Report for State and In-House Review
Meet and Review with State
Supplemental Viral Profile and Benchmark
Totals
Systems
(Respondents)
A
0
0
0
0
0
0
Unit Burden
B
1.0
8.7
4.3
40.0
8.0
53.0
115.0
Unit Cost
C
$
32
$
281
$
140
$
1,295
$
259
$
1,716
$
3,724
Total Burden
(hrs.)
A*B
-
Total Initial
Cost
A*C
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
Total Cost
$
-
Total Costs for All Start-Up Activities
Notes:
Baseline number systems performing rule activities from all filtered systems. Percentages requiring report and viral benchmark
from original LT1ESTWTR analysis.
Start-up activities are assumed to have been completed prior to the start of this ICR period.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 15
December 2011
Exhibit E10.1
PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
by Systems Serving 1,000 People or Fewer
Exhibit E10.1a
Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)
Activity
Data Analysis
Data Review
Record Keeping
Systems
(Respondents) [1]
A
1,115
1,115
1,115
Frequency
Unit Burden [2]
B
C
52
0.17
52
0.17
12
2.00
Unit Cost Annual Burden (hrs.)
D
A*B*C
$5
9,662
$5
9,662
$65
26,758
$76
46,083
Annual Cost
A*B*D
$312,909
$312,909
$866,518
$1,492,337
Unit Cost Annual Burden (hrs.)
D
A*B*C
$259
1,605
$1,619
2,230
$1,878
3,835
Annual Cost
A*B*D
$51,991
$72,209
$124,200
Annual Burden (hrs.)
49,918
Annual Cost
$1,616,536
Exhibit E10.1b
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems
Activity
Annual Reporting Exceptions
Annual IFA
Total
Systems
(Respondents) [1]
A
201
45
Frequency
B
Unit Burden [2]
C
1
8.0
1
50.0
Total for All PWS Labor Burdens and Costs
Exhibit E10.1c
Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance
Activities
Turbidimeter Installation [3]
Operation and Maintenance
Total
Systems
Unit Cost
$3,482
$1,045
1,115
1,115
Total Cost
Annual Cost [3]
$3,882,428
$554,633
$1,164,729
$1,164,729
$5,047,157
$1,719,361
Annual Burden (hrs.)
49,918
Total for All PWS Activities
Annual Cost
$3,335,898
[1] Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWSs and NTNCWSs from system baseline. Percentage performing
exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.
[2] Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
[3] Turbidimeter installation costs are averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 16
December 2011
Exhibit E10.2
PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
by Systems Serving 1,001 - 3,300 People
Exhibit E10.2a
Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)
Activity
Data Analysis
Data Review
Record Keeping
Totals
Systems
(Respondents) [1]
A
729
729
729
Frequency
Unit Burden [2]
B
C
52
0.250
52
0.250
12
2.0
Unit Cost
D
$
8
$
8
$
65
$
81
Annual Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
9,477
9,477
17,495
36,448
$
$
$
$
Annual Cost
A*B*D
306,889
306,889
566,564
1,180,342
Annual Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
1,050 $
1,458 $
2,508 $
Annual Cost
A*B*D
33,996
47,217
81,213
Annual Burden (hrs.)
38,956
$
Annual Cost
1,261,555
Total Cost
4,292,351
761,484
5,053,836
$
$
$
Annual Cost [3]
613,193
761,484
1,374,677
Annual Burden (hrs.)
38,956
$
Annual Cost
2,636,232
Exhibit E10.2b
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems
Activity
Annual Reporting Exceptions
Annual IFA
Total
Systems
(Respondents) [1]
A
131
29
Frequency
B
Unit Burden [2] Unit Cost
C
D
1
8.0 $
259
1
50.0 $ 1,619
$ 1,878
Total for All PWS Activities
Exhibit E10.2c
Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance
Activity
Turbidimeter Installation [3]
Operation and Maintenance
Total
Systems
Unit Cost
$ 5,888 $
$ 1,045 $
$
729
729
Total for All PWS Activities
[1] Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWSs and NTNCWSs from system baseline. Percentage performing
exceptions reporting and IFA from LT1ESWTR EA.
[2] Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
[3] Turbidimeter installation costs are averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 17
December 2011
Exhibit E10.3
PWS Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
by Systems Serving 3,301 - 10,000 People
Exhibit E10.3a
Monitoring Requirements for Plants (Monitoring at Individual Filters)
Activity
Data Analysis
Data Review
Record Keeping
Totals
Systems
(Respondents) [1]
A
927
927
927
Frequency Unit Burden [2]
B
C
52
0.250
52
0.250
12
2.0
Unit Cost
D
$
8
$
8
$
65
$
81
Annual Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
12,046
12,046
22,238
46,329
$
$
$
$
Annual Cost
A*B*D
390,087
390,087
720,160
1,500,333
Annual Burden (hrs.)
A*B*C
1335 $
1854 $
3,188 $
Annual Cost
A*B*D
43,217
60,024
103,241
Annual Burden (hrs.)
49,517
$
Annual Cost
1,603,574
Total Cost
7,685,345
967,923
8,653,268
$
$
$
Annual Cost [3]
1,097,906
967,923
2,065,829
Annual Burden (hrs.)
49,517
$
Annual Cost
3,669,403
Exhibit E10.3b
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting for Systems
Activity
Annual Reporting Exceptions
Annual IFA
Total
Systems
(Respondents)
A
Frequency
per Year
B
167
37
Unit Burden [2] Unit Cost
C
D
1
8.0 $
259
1
50.0 $
1,619
$
1,878
Total Labor Burdens and Costs
Exhibit E10.3c
Turbidimeter Installation, Operation, and Maintenance
Activity
Turbidimeter Installation [3]
Operation and Maintenance
Total
Systems
Unit Cost
$
8,294
$
1,045
927
927
Total for All PWS Activities
$
$
$
[1] Systems performing monitoring include direct and conventional filtration CWS and NTNCWS from system baseline. Percentage performing
exceptions reporting and IFA is from the LT1ESWTR EA.
[2] Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
[3] Turbidimeter installation costs are averaged over the seven year lifespan of the equipment.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 18
December 2011
Exhibit E11
State Cost and Burden Estimates for Start-up Activities by Activity
Profiling & Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking Labor
Activity
Compliance Tracking [1]
Analyze and Review Profiling Data
Make Determinations
Meet and Review with PWSs
Review Viral Benchmark
Recordkeeping
Total
Responses
A
-
Hours per
Task
B
4.0
8.0
8.0
16.0
16.0
4.0
56.0
Cost per Total Burden
Task
(hrs.)
C
A*B
$ 175.17
$ 350.34
$ 350.34
$ 700.67
$ 700.67
$ 175.17
$ 2,452.35
-
Total Initial
Cost ($)
A*C
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
-
Total Burden Total Cost
(hrs.)
($)
$
-
Total for All Start-Up Activities
[1] Includes tracking for applicability monitoring or profiling, as well as data review, determinations, and consultations
with PWSs. Profiling and benchmarking were completed during previous ICR periods.
Note:
Start-up activities are assumed to have been completed prior to the start of this ICR period.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 19
December 2011
Exhibit E12
State Cost and Burden Estimates for Annual Activities
Exhibit E12a
Turbidity Monitoring
Activity
Compliance Tracking
Recordkeeping
Total
Responses
A
2,770
2,770
Frequency
per Year
B
12
12
Unit Burden
(hrs.) [2]
C
1.0
2.0
Cost per Task
D
$
44
$
88
Total Burden
(hrs.)
A*B*C
33,245
66,491
99,736
Responses
A
499
26
29
Frequency
per Year
B
1
1
1
Unit Burden
(hrs.) [2]
C
3.5
400.0
250.0
Cost per Task
D
$
153
$
17,517
$
10,948
Total Burden
(hrs.)
A*B*C
1,746
10,405
7,350
19,501
$
$
$
Cost ($)
A*B*D
1,455,885
2,911,771
4,367,656
$
$
$
$
Cost ($)
A*B*D
76,439
455,674
321,857
853,971
Exhibit E12b
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting
Activity
Annual Exceptions Reports
Annual CPE (serving 1,000 or less) [1]
Annual CPE (serving 1,001 - 10,000) [1]
Total
[1] Number of systems requiring CPE calculated using percentage from LT1ESTWR 2004 ICR.
[2] Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives (including states).
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 20
December 2011
Exhibit E13
Summary of Annual Costs
Annual Activities
Source
Exhibit
Total Annual
Cost
PWS Cost Estimates for Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting and IFAs
Turbidimeter Capital Cost
Turbidimeter O&M Cost
Subtotal
E3.4
E3.4
E3.4
E3.4
$
$
$
$
$
4,173,012
308,653
2,265,732
2,894,136
9,641,533
State Cost Estimates for Annual Activities
Turbidity Monitoring
Turbidity Exceptions Reporting and CPEs
Subtotal
E4
E4
$
$
$
4,367,656
853,971
5,221,626
$
14,863,160
Total Cost Estimates for Annual Activities
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 21
December 2011
Exhibit E14
Occupational Cost and Burden per Start-up Activity
Total Burden
Activity [1]
Hours [2] Labor Rate Total Cost
States
Profiling and Benchmark Dev./Compl. Tracking
56.0 $
43.79 $
2,452
[1] The activities listed in the first column correspond to Exhibit E11.
[2] Sum of hours devoted to each task listed in Exhibit E11.
Note:
Start-up activities are assumed to have been completed prior to the start of this ICR period.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 22
December 2011
Exhibit E15
Occupational Cost and Burden per Activity per Year
Activity [1]
PWSs Serving 0-500
Turbidity Monitoring
Exception Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
PWSs Serving 501-1,000
Turbidity Monitoring
Exception Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
PWSs Serving 1,001-3,300
Turbidity Monitoring
Exception Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
PWSs Serving 3,301-10,000
Turbidity Monitoring
Exception Reporting
Individual Filter Assessment
States
Turbidity Monitoring State
Exceptions Reporting [4]
Hours [2]
Total Burden
Labor Rate [3]
Cost
41.3 $
8.0 $
50.0 $
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
1,339
259
1,619
41.3 $
8.0 $
50.0 $
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
1,339
259
1,619
50.0 $
8.0 $
50.0 $
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
1,619
259
1,619
50.0 $
8.0 $
50.0 $
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
1,619
259
1,619
36.0 $
403.5 $
43.79
43.79
$
$
1,577
17,670
[1] Activities correspond to Tables a-c in Exhibits E10.1, E10.2, and E10.3.
[2] Hourly burdens are the sum of the hours devoted to each of the line items listed
in tables a-c in Exhibits E10.1, E10.2, and E10.3, multiplied by the frequency of the
activity.
[3] PWS labor rates are National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates,
United States, BLS SOC Code 51-8031, "Local Government - Water and Liquid
Waste Treatment Plant and System Operators". May 2010 data (published in May
2011). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes518031.htm. State labor rates are National
Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 192041, "State Government - Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including
Health". May 2010 data (published in May 2011).
http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes192041.htm.
[4] Exceptions reporting for states includes CPEs, which are assumed to take 400
hours for a system serving < 1000 and 250 hours for a system serving 1,001-10,000.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 23
December 2011
Exhibit E16
LT1 Universe of Respondents Performing
Information Collection and Record Keeping Activities
Turbidity
Monitoring
System Types
Community
Transient Non-Community
Non-Transient Non-Community
Total
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
2,171
435
164
2,770
E - 24
Three Year
Total
2,171
435
164
2,770
December 2011
Exhibit E17
LT1 Activity Schedule
Start date:
Activity
Turbidity Monitoring Start-up - Systems
Turbidity Monitoring Annual - Systems
Turbidity Monitoring Start-up - States
Turbidity Monitoring Annual - States
Turbidity Monitoring Capital
Turbidity Monitoring O&M
Benchmarking Start-up - Systems ≤500
Benchmarking Start-up - Systems 501-10,000
Benchmarking Start-up - States
Disinfection Profiling - Systems ≤500
Disinfection Profiling - Systems 501-10,000
Disinfection Profiling - States
Benchmarking - Systems ≤500
Benchmarking - Systems 501-10,000
Benchmarking State - State
Covered Finished Water*
Year 1
Jan. 2002Dec. 2002
17%
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
70%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 2
Jan. 2003Dec. 2003
33%
0%
33%
0%
20%
20%
100%
100%
30%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 3
Jan. 2004Dec. 2004
50%
0%
50%
0%
80%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
50%
60%
0%
100%
60%
5%
Year 4
Jan. 2005Dec. 2005
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
40%
100%
0%
40%
5%
Year 5
Jan. 2006Dec. 2006
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 6
Jan. 2007Dec. 2007
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 7
Jan. 2008Dec. 2008
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 8
Jan. 2009Dec. 2009
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 9
Jan. 2010Dec. 2010
0%
100%
0%
100%
20%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 10
Jan. 2011Dec. 2011
0%
100%
0%
100%
80%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 11
Jan. 2012Dec. 2012
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 12
Jan. 2013Dec. 2013
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 13
Jan. 2014Dec. 2014
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 14
Jan. 2015Dec. 2015
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
Year 15
Jan. 2016Dec. 2016
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
* This rule activity is not associated with information collection or recordkeeping.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 25
December 2011
Exhibit E18
System
Baseline
E.18a - Systems Serving ≤100 to 10,000
Surface Water
and GWUDI
Non-Purchased Surface
Water/GWUDI
Unfiltered Surface
Water/GWUDI
Filtered Non-Purchased
Surface Water/GWUDI
Percent Conventional
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
CWS
NTNC
TNC
Population Category
or Direct Filtration
<100
987
257
1,345
416
121
631
1
0
3
415
121
628
22.6%
101-500
2,150
264
500
644
150
376
4
0
0
640
150
376
58.1%
501-1,000
1,171
86
86
348
50
63
2
0
0
346
50
63
37.7%
1,001-3,300
2,521
75
63
948
34
50
1
0
0
947
34
50
70.7%
3,301-10K
2,149
29
24
1,011
7
17
0
0
0
1,011
7
17
89.5%
Source: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010. Number of unfiltered systems from 2006 CWSS.
Note: Source was not specified for some systems. These PWSs were assigned to SW or GW categories based on the ratio of SW to GW systems within a given size category.
Percent of plants that use conventional or direct filtration from 2006 CWSS survey
Conventional or Direct Surface
Water/GWUDI Systems
CWS
94
372
130
670
905
NTNC
27
87
19
24
6
TNC
142
219
24
35
15
E.18b - Systems Serving ≤1,000 to 10,000
Population Category
< 1,000
1,001 - 3,300
3,301 - 10,000
Total
Conventional or Direct Surface
Water/GWUDI
CWS
NTNC
TNC
Total
597
134
385
1,115
670
24
35
729
905
6
15
927
2,171
164
435
2,770
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 26
December 2011
Exhibit E19
Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
No changes in burden estimates based on December 2011 consultations.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT1ESWTR
E - 27
December 2011
Appendix F
Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water
Treatment Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit F.1 Summary of Burden, Respondents, Responses, and Costs for the ICR Approval Period
Source
(Exhibit)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
May-12
April-13
May-13
April-14
May-14
April-15
Annual
Average
Total
PWSs
Burden (hours)
F.2
21,974
41,086
66,057
129,117
43,039
Respondents (number)
F.3
1,320
1,248
1,326
1,326
1,231
Responses (number)
F.4
3,210
7,089
15,580
25,879
8,626
Costs (dollars)
Labor
O&M
Capital
F.5
$
$
$
$
711,607
711,607
-
$
$
$
$
1,330,535
1,330,535
-
$
$
$
$
3,994,869
2,139,174
1,855,695
-
$
$
$
$
Burden per respondent
6,037,012
4,181,317
1,855,695
-
$
$
$
$
2,012,337
1,393,772
618,565
-
97.4
Cost per respondent
States
Burden (hours)
F.2
14,464
27,219
44,241
85,925
28,642
Respondents (number)
F.3
57
57
57
57
57
Responses (number)
F.4
3,256
7,134
10,720
920
307
Costs (dollars)
Labor
O&M
Capital
F.5
$
$
$
$
$
633,420
633,420
-
$
$
$
$
1,191,964
1,191,964
-
$
$
$
$
1,937,423
1,937,423
-
$
$
$
$
Burden per respondent
4,553
3,762,807
3,762,807
-
$
$
$
$
1,254,269
1,254,269
-
1,507.4
$
66,014
Cost per respondent
Total - PWS and States
Burden (hours)
F.2
36,438
68,305
110,298
215,041
71,680
Respondents (number)
F.3
1,377
1,305
1,383
1,383
1,288
Responses (number)
F.4
6,466
14,223
26,300
46,989
15,663
Cost (dollars)
Labor
O&M
Capital
F.5
$
$
$
$
1,345,027
1,345,027
-
$
$
$
$
2,522,500
2,522,500
-
$
$
$
$
5,932,292
4,076,597
1,855,695
-
$
$
$
$
Burden per respondent
9,799,818
7,944,124
1,855,695
-
$
$
$
$
3,266,606
2,648,041
618,565
-
155.5
$
Cost per respondent
7,086
Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.
The number of respondents is not added; rather the maximum number of respondents for the 3 years for a given activity is used to
avoid double-counting.
Annual average burden and costs represent burden and costs for May 1, 2012 - April 31, 2015.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-1
December 2011
Exhibit F.2 Burden for the ICR Approval Period (Hours)
Source
(Exhibit)
PWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [4]
Assessment for Bin Reclassification [5]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
PWSs - Total
States and Territories
Start-up [6]
Bin Determination and Reviewing Monitoring
Data [7]
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [8]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [9]
States and Territories - Total
Total
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
May-12
April-13
May-13
April-14
May-14
April-15
F.7
-
F.9
F.10
F.11
F.13
F.16
F.17
Annual
Average
Total
15,033
6,941
34,635
6,451
51,999
5,344
-
33,889
6,245
2,890
3,490
2,334
66,057
101,667
18,736
2,890
3,490
2,334
129,117
F.19
F.20
F.21
21,974
41,086
F.8
-
-
-
-
-
F.12
F.14
F.15
F.18
10,022
4,442
14,464
23,090
4,129
27,219
6,155
34,666
3,420
44,241
6,155
67,778
11,991
85,925
2,052
22,593
3,997
28,642
36,438
68,305
110,298
215,041
71,680
963
1,163
778
43,039
Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.
Sources:
See Exhibit F.22 for breakdown of burden by year and system type.
Years listed in the following notes are years post-promulgation.
(1) Start-up burden is assumed to have been completed in Year 3.
(2) Initial E.coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring was completed by all systems by Year 6.
(3) Reporting requirements associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Year 3.
(4) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking are assumed to occur before systems begin installing treatment.
(5) Assessment for Bin Reclassification begins in Year 9 for systems serving 100,000 or more.
(6) State rule start-up activities paralleled system activities.
(7) Bin determination and monitoring review are assumed to parallel system monitoring and reporting activities.
(8) State activities related to uncovered finished water reservoirs parallel system activities.
(9) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking activities will parallel system activities.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-2
December 2011
Exhibit F.3 Respondents for the ICR Approval Period
Source
(Exhibit)
PWSs
Start-up [1,2]
Assessment for Binning [3, 4]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [5]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [6]
Assessment for Bin Reclassification
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Year 2
Year 3
May-13
April-14
May-14
April-15
-
-
-
-
-
F.9
F.10
F.11
F.13
F.16
F.17
447
1,320
985
1,248
1,326
1,124
F.19
F.20
F.21
-
-
288
288
288
1,326
1,320
288
288
288
919
1,231
96
96
96
1,320
1,248
1,326
1,326
1,231
F.8
-
-
-
-
-
F.12
F.14
F.15
F.18
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
19
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
1,377
1,305
1,383
1,383
1,288
States and Territories - Total
Total
Annual
Average
Total [11]
F.7
PWSs - Total
States and Territories
Start-up [7]
Bin Determination and Reviewing Monitoring
Data [8]
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [9]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [10]
Year 1
May-12
April-13
Notes:
Detail may not add due to rounding.
To avoid double-counting the number of respondents for assessment for binning and for State activities, the highest number of respondents for an activity for
each year is used for the total number of respondents.
Years listed in the following notes are years post-promulgation.
(1) Each PWS is assumed to be a respondent.
(2) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(3) Each plant is assumed to be a respondent.
(4) This activity was completed in the previous ICR period.
(5) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(6) Systems are assumed to conduct disinfection profiling and benchmarking prior to installing treatment.
(7) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(8) Each State will be a respondent associated with reviewing monitoring data.
(9) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(10) State activities for reviewing disinfection benchmarks are assumed to parallel system activities for profiling and benchmarking.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-3
December 2011
Exhibit F.4 Responses for the ICR Approval Period
Source
(Exhibit)
PWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin Reclassification
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting [6]
PWSs - Total
States and Territories
Start-up [7]
Bin Determination and Reviewing Monitoring
Data [8]
Reviewing/approving UCFWR schedule [9]
Technology Reporting
Disinfection Benchmarking [10]
States and Territories - Total
Total
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
May-12
April-13
May-13
April-14
May-14
April-15
Annual
Average
Total
F.7
-
-
-
-
-
F.9
F.10
F.11
F.13
F.16
F.17
2,978
232
6,876
212
10,335
169
F.19
F.20
F.21
3,210
7,089
2,343
2,538
195
15,580
20,190
613
2,343
2,538
195
25,879
6,730
204
781
846
65
8,626
F.8
-
-
-
-
-
F.12
F.14
F.15
F.18
2,978
278
3,256
6,876
258
7,134
171
10,335
214
10,720
171
-
57
-
749
920
250
307
6,466
14,223
26,300
26,799
8,933
Notes
Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.
Years listed in the following notes are years post-promulgation.
(1) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(2) This activity was completed in the previous ICR period.
(3) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(4) Systems are assumed to report monthly. This may be an overestimate, since reporting requirements vary with technology used.
(5) Disinfection profiling and benchmarking are considered 1 response. Profiling is assumed to be conducted prior to treatment installation.
(6) Two responses are associated with the second round of reporting: sampling plan and bin calculation.
(7) State start-up activities are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(8) Each State will have 3 responses associated with binning and reviewing monitoring data (see Exhibit F.12). The number of responses from States and
Territories equals three times the number of small systems performing E. coli monitoring in a given year.
(9) Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(10) State reviews of disinfection benchmarks will parallel system activities. One response per system conducting benchmarking is assumed.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-4
December 2011
Exhibit F.5 Cost for the ICR Approval Period
Source
(Exhibit)
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
May-12 to April-13
May-13 to April-14
May-14 to April-15
Labor
O&M
Capital
Labor
O&M
Capital
Labor
Total
O&M
May-12 to April-15
Capital
Labor
O&M
Annual
Capital
Total
Average
PWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
F.7
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
F.9
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
F.10
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
F.11
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
F.13
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Technology Reporting
F.16
$
486,845
$
-
$
-
$ 1,121,624
$
-
$
-
$ 1,683,921
$
-
$
-
$
3,292,390
$
-
$
-
$
3,292,390
$
1,097,463
Disinfection Benchmarking [4]
F.17
$
224,762
$
-
$
-
$
$
-
$
-
$
$
-
$
-
$
606,741
$
-
$
-
$
606,741
$
202,247
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Assessment for Bin Reclassification
E. coli Monitoring
208,911
173,068
F.19
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
93,595
$
58,195
$
-
$
93,595
$
58,195
$
-
$
151,790
$
50,597
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
F.20
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
113,022
$
1,797,500
$
-
$
113,022
$
1,797,500
$
-
$
1,910,522
$
636,841
Reporting
F.21
PWSs - Total
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
75,569
$
-
$
-
$
75,569
$
-
$
-
$
75,569
$
25,190
$
711,607
$
-
$
-
$ 1,330,535
$
-
$
-
$ 2,139,174
$
1,855,695
$
-
$
4,181,317
$
1,855,695
$
-
$
6,037,012
$
2,012,337
States and Territories
Start-up [5]
F.8
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Reporting and bin determination
F.12
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
269,560
$
-
$
-
$
269,560
$
-
$
-
$
269,560
$
89,853
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule [6]
F.14
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Technology Reporting
F.15
$
438,898
$
-
$
-
$ 1,011,161
$
-
$
-
$ 1,518,080
$
-
$
-
$
2,968,139
$
-
$
-
$
2,968,139
$
989,380
Disinfection Benchmarking [7]
F.18
$
194,522
$
-
$
-
$
180,803
$
-
$
-
$
149,782
$
-
$
-
$
525,107
$
-
$
-
$
525,107
$
175,036
States and Territories - Total
$
633,420
$
-
$
-
$ 1,191,964
$
-
$
-
$ 1,937,423
$
-
$
-
$
3,762,807
$
-
$
-
$
3,762,807
$
1,254,269
Total
$ 1,345,027
$
-
$
-
$ 2,522,500
$
-
$
-
$ 4,076,597
$
1,855,695
$
-
$
7,944,124
$
1,855,695
$
-
$
9,799,818
$
3,266,606
Note: Detail may not add to total due to rounding.
Sources
See Exhibit F.23 for a breakdown of cost by year and system type.
Years below are years post-promulgation.
(1) Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
(2) All initial E. coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring by systems (Assessment for binning) was completed by Year 6.
(3) Systems are assumed to have incurred costs associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs during Years 1-3.
(4) Costs associated with disinfection profiling and benchmarking are assumed to be incurred prior to treatment installation.
(5) State rule start-up activities will parallel system activities.
(6) Costs associated with reviewing reports on uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been incurred during Years 1-3.
(7) State costs associated with reviewing disinfection benchmarks are assumed to parallel system costs.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-5
December 2011
Exhibit F.6a Baseline Number of Plants for Rule Start-up and Monitoring Activities
Implementation
System Size
(Population
Served)
Percent of
Plants with >
5.5 Log
Treatment
Number of Number of
Filtered
Unfiltered Baseline # Prior to Rule
Systems
Systems
PWSs
Promulgation
A
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
B
C=A+B
Future Monitoring for Re-Binning
Monitoring for Initial Bin Classification
D
Baseline # of
Plants
Plants Conducting E.
Per
coli
System
Monitoring
E
F = A*E*(1-D)
Percent of
Plants
Triggered to
Monitor for
Cryptosporidium
G
Percent of
Percent of
Baseline # of
Plants with > Plants with > Baseline # of
Plants
5.5 Log
5.5 Log
Plants
Conducting
Treatment for Treatment for Conducting
CryptosporiLT2
Stage 2
E. coli
dium Monitoring Compliance Compliance
Monitoring
H=F*G+B*E
I
J
K = F*(1-I-J)
Baseline # of
Plants
Conducting
Cryptosporidium
Monitoring
L = G*K
384
649
348
965
1,010
973
224
236
17
4,807
1
4
2
1
5
1
1
15
385
653
350
966
1,010
978
225
236
18
4,822
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.4
1.5
3.7
377
665
344
930
1,040
1,047
302
356
62
5,122
35%
35%
35%
35%
35%
132
236
122
325
362
1,052
303
356
66
2,953
5.3%
5.3%
5.3%
9.7%
9.5%
30.4%
30.3%
29.7%
29.7%
15.0%
6.3%
6.3%
1.8%
1.8%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
300
588
304
823
922
713
206
245
43
4,145
104
204
106
287
321
713
206
245
43
2,229
104
162
47
42
7
1
363
-
104
162
47
42
7
1
0
0
0
363
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
3.6%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
0.4%
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
100
156
45
41
7
1
350
35%
35%
35%
35%
35%
35
54
16
14
2
1
0
0
0
123
5.3%
5.3%
5.3%
9.7%
9.5%
30.4%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
15.0%
6.3%
6.3%
1.8%
1.8%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
1.5%
80
138
40
36
6
1
301
28
48
14
12
2
1
0
0
0
105
544
444
66
63
16
1
1,135
6,305
2
1
3
18
546
445
66
63
16
1
0
0
0
1,138
6,323
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
544
444
66
63
16
1
1,135
6,607
35%
35%
35%
35%
35%
191
156
23
22
6
1
0
0
0
399
3,474
5.3%
5.3%
5.3%
9.7%
9.5%
30.4%
0.0%
14.8%
58.6%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
516
421
63
57
14
1
1,071
5,516
179
146
22
20
5
1
0
0
0
373
2,707
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.
Sources:
(C) Number of systems from SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.
(D) EPA assumes only membrane filtration plants will have > 5.5 log Cryptosporidium treatment prior to rule promulgation. Plants estimated to have membrane filtration as a result of Stage 1 DBPR
compliance are from the Economic Analysis for the Stage 2 DBPR.
(E) For CWSs, from the 2006 CWSS. NCWSs are assumed to have one plant per system.
(G) Percentage of plants triggered into Cryptosporidium monitoring is estimated from the modeled Information Collection Rule Occurrence Distribution. All systems serving greater than 10,000 people must
conduct Cryptosporidium monitoring.
(I) Derived from Appendix G of the LT2ESWTR Economic Analysis; this number is calculated by dividing the number of plants achieving 5.5 log treatment for the LT2ESWTR by the total number of plants for
the size category.
(J) EPA assumes only membrane plants will have > 5.5 log Cryptosporidium treatment as a result of the Stage 2 DBPR. Estimates from the Economic Analysis for the Stage 2 DBPR.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-6
December 2011
Exhibit F.6b Labor Rates
Cost Assumptions: Labor Rate Components
Base Hourly ECI in Year of
Labor Cost
Data
A
B
Cost Element
ECI
2010
C
2010 Labor
Cost
D=A*(C/B)
$
43.79
1.0
1.0 $
43.79
State Employee
Sources: (A) National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 19-2041, "State Government
- Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health". May 2010 data (published in May 2011).
http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes192041.htm. Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.
(B) - (C) Not required (source data is in 2010$)
Technical Wage Rates by System Size
Rate
Base Wage Rate ($2010)
Loaded Wage Rate ($2010)
Loaded Wage Rate ($2010)
25-100
$ 20.24
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
101-500
$
20.24
$
32.38
$
32.38
System size
500-3.3k
3.3k-10k
$
20.24 $
20.24
$
32.38 $
32.38
$
32.38 $
32.38
10k-100k
$
20.24
$
32.38
$
32.38
>100k
$ 20.24
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
Source: National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 51-8031, "Local Government - Water and
Liquid Waste Treatment Plant and System Operators". May 2010 data (published in May 2011). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes518031.htm.
Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-7
December 2011
Exhibit F.6b (continued) Labor Rates
Laboratory Cost Per Sample [1]
Range [2]
Total Laboratory
Min
Max
Average
Cost per Plant
$
708 $
520 $
953
$18,412
Analyte
Cryptosporidium [3]
E. Coli
(1) Utility Analysis
28
16
51
730
(2) Commercial Lab
94
80
114
2,434
Note: Lab costs per sample updated to $2010, from BLS, using PPI (annual, all
commodities).
[1] Lab costs based on EPA subcontractor (DynCorp) survey of laboratories.
Cryptosporidium costs assume all plants must send samples to commercial
laboratories and that 27 percent of samples will require multiple subsamples
analysis at additional cost (based on Supplemental Survey results). E. Coli costs
are provided for utility analysis (no shipping) and commercial analysis, which
includes overnight shipping charges.
[2] Minimum costs are estimated from DynCorp for the minimum analytical cost
and the mean cost for shipping a 37.6 pound package (average weight of
sample as observed during the Supplemental Survey, estimated by Kevin
Connell) overnight (FedEx). Maximum costs are estimated from DynCorp for the
maximum analytical costs, the mean cost for shipping a 37.6 pound package
(average weight of sample as observed during the Supplemental Survey,
estimated by Kevin connell) overnight (FedEx), and the maximum cost of an
additional subsample analysis, also estimated by DynCorp.
[3] Assumes monthly Cryptosporidium monitoring, plus two matrix spike samples
to be analyzed at the beginning of monitoring and bi-weekly E. Coli monitoring.
These are conservative estimates, therefore laboratory costs could be lower.
Average
Costs
Crypto Analytical
$
539
E. coli Analytical
Commercial $
47
Utility $
28
Shipping (lbs)
7
47
25
93
50
145
Mean - 37.6
119
Subsample
51
$
708
Crypto Total
E. coli commercial
$
94
Total
Minimum Maximum
$
401 $
647
$
$
33
16
$
$
67
51
$
64
0
520
$
162
187
953
$
80
$
114
28 $
16 $
51
E. coli analytical Total $
Note: Lab costs per sample and shipping costs updated to
$2010, from BLS, using PPI (annual, all commodities).
E. coli commercial shipping costs were estimated by
assuming that two 125-mL sample containers would be
shipped to the laboratory in a 10-quart polyethylene cooler
packed with approximately 4 lb of UTEK gel paks.
The approximate weight of the shipment, given these
assumptions, is 7 lb. Using this weight, we estimated shipping
costs for standard overnight service for shipments to 12
locations using the Fed Ex web site.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-8
December 2011
Exhibit F.7 Burden and Cost to PWSs Associated with Rule Start-Up Activities (Completed in Years 1-3)
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Baseline #
of Systems
Read
Train
Total
Conducting
Hours per Hours per Hours per
Cost per ImplementaPWS
PWS
PWS
Labor Hour
tion
A
B
C=A+B
D
E
Total Cost
F = C*D*E
Total Burden
(Hours)
G = C*E
Total Burden
(FTEs)
H = G/2080
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
50
50
50
50
50
50
65
65
65
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
385
653
350
966
1,010
978
225
236
18
4,822
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
623,868
1,057,724
566,916
1,564,335
1,635,726
1,583,578
473,616
496,771
37,889
8,040,422
19,265
32,662
17,506
48,306
50,510
48,900
14,625
15,340
1,170
248,284
9.3
15.7
8.4
23.2
24.3
23.5
7.0
7.4
0.6
119.4
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
50
50
50
50
50
50
65
65
65
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
104
162
47
42
7
1
363
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
168,543
262,419
76,102
68,079
11,334
1,619
588,097
5,205
8,103
2,350
2,102
350
50
18,160
2.5
3.9
1.1
1.0
0.2
0.0
8.7
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
35
15
15
15
15
15
15
30
30
30
50
50
50
50
50
50
65
65
65
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
546
445
66
63
16
1
1,138
6,323
$
884,791
$
720,739
$
106,867
$
102,125
$
25,907
$
1,619
$
$
$
$ 1,842,049
$ 10,470,569
27,322
22,256
3,300
3,154
800
50
56,881
323,325
13.1
10.7
1.6
1.5
0.4
0.0
27.3
155.4
Notes:
Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shown for
informational purposes only.
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.
Sources:
(A & B) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(E) Taken from Exhibit F.6b, column A.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-9
December 2011
Exhibit F.8 Burden and Cost to States and Primacy Agencies Associated
with Rule Start-up Activities (Completed in Years 1-3)
Cost per
Labor Hour FTEs per State Hours per State
Cost Per State
Implementation Activities
A
B
C = B*2080
D = A*C
Regulation Adoption and Program Development $
43.79
1.00
2,080 $
91,087
Training State Staff
$
43.79
0.50
1,040 $
45,544
Training PWS Staff and Technical Assistants
$
43.79
1.00
2,080 $
91,087
Updating Data Management System
$
43.79
0.25
520 $
22,772
Public Notification
$
43.79
0.10
208 $
9,109
Totals per State
2.85
5,928 $
259,599
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
162.45
337,896 $
14,797,142
Notes:
Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shown
for informational purposes only.
Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.
All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.
1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)
Sources:
(A) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(B) FTEs per State/Primacy Agency take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-10
December 2011
Exhibit F.9 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with E. coli Monitoring for Bin Determination (Completed in Year 6)
Sampling
System Size
(Population
Served)
Baseline # of
Plants
# of E.
Conducting
coli
E. coli
Monitoring Samples
A
B
Hours
per
Sample
C
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
377
665
344
930
1,040
1,047
302
356
62
5,122
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
100
156
45
41
7
1
350
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
546
445
66
63
16
1
1,138
6,610
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Cost
per
Labor
Hour
Sample Analysis
Total Sampling
Labor Cost
D
Commercial
Analysis
(Includes
Shipping)
E = A*B*C*D
F
Utility
Utility
Utility
Percent
Analysis Analysis Analysis Utilities with
Hours per Cost per Cost per
E. coli
Analysis
Sample
Sample
Sample
Capabilities
(Total)
(O&M)
(Labor)
G
H = I-G*D
I
J
Total
Laboratory Total Laboratory
Analysis Cost Analysis Cost
(O&M)
(Labor)
Total Cost
L = F*A*B*(1J)+H*A*B*J
K = D*G*J*A*B
M = E+K+L
Total Burden
(Hours)
Total
Burden
(FTEs)
O=
N = A*B*C+A*B*G*J N/2,080
Responses
Respondents
P = A*B
Q
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
317,147
559,684
289,759
783,358
875,671
813,641
234,409
276,500
48,269
4,198,438
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
19,822
34,980
18,110
48,960
54,729
152,558
43,952
69,125
12,067
454,303
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
736,586
1,299,886
672,976
1,819,377
2,033,775
964,735
277,939
170,679
29,796
8,005,750
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,073,555
1,894,551
980,846
2,651,695
2,964,175
1,930,934
556,300
516,304
90,132
12,658,491
10,405
18,363
9,507
25,702
28,730
29,836
8,596
10,673
1,863
143,674
5.0
8.8
4.6
12.4
13.8
14.3
4.1
5.1
0.9
69.1
9,793
17,283
8,948
24,190
27,040
25,125
7,238
8,538
1,491
129,645
377
665
344
930
1,040
1,047
302
356
62
5,122
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
84,487
131,545
38,149
34,127
5,682
774
294,764
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5,280
8,222
2,384
2,133
355
145
18,520
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
196,225
305,518
88,601
79,260
13,196
918
683,719
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
285,993
445,285
129,134
115,520
19,233
1,838
997,003
2,772
4,316
1,252
1,120
186
28
9,674
1.3
2.1
0.6
0.5
0.1
0.0
4.7
2,609
4,062
1,178
1,054
175
24
9,102
100
156
45
41
7
1
350
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
460,091
374,784
55,571
53,105
13,472
777
957,801
5,451,003
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28,756
23,424
3,473
3,319
842
146
59,960
532,782
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,068,578
870,450
129,065
123,339
31,289
922
2,223,642
10,913,111
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,557,426
1,268,658
188,110
179,763
45,602
1,844
3,241,403
16,896,897
15,095
12,296
1,823
1,742
442
29
31,428
184,776
7.3
5.9
0.9
0.8
0.2
0.0
15.1
88.8
14,207
11,573
1,716
1,640
416
24
29,576
168,324
546
445
66
63
16
1
1,138
6,610
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column D.
(B) Bi-weekly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems.
(C) Estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(F) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, June 2002 (updated to $2010).
(G) Estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(H) The amount left after labor is subtracted from the amount in column I.
(I) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, December 2000 (updated to $2010).
(J) Estimate based on Third Edition Baseline Handbook data.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-11
December 2011
Exhibit F.10 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Cryptosporidium Monitoring for Bin Determination (Completed in Year 6)
System Size
(Population
Served)
Sampling
Baseline #
of Plants
Cost
Conducting
per
# of Crypto- Hours
CryptoLabor
per
sporidium
sporidium
Sample Hour
Samples
Monitoring
A
B
C
D
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
132
236
122
325
362
1,052
303
356
66
National Totals
2,953
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
35
54
16
14
2
1
-
National Totals
123
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
191
156
23
22
6
1
399
Grand Totals
3,474
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
Sample Analysis
Total
Sampling
Labor Cost
Cost per
Sample
Total Laboratory
Analysis Cost
(O&M)
E = A*B*C*D
F
G = A*B*F
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
152,932
272,727
141,024
375,995
419,008
1,218,237
350,736
411,870
76,146
$
3,418,675
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
40,427
62,944
18,254
16,330
2,719
1,153
-
$
141,828
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
221,663
180,089
26,591
25,411
6,446
1,158
461,358
$
4,021,861
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
Total Cost
H = E+G
Total
Burden
(Hours)
I = A*B*C
Total
Burden
(FTEs)
J = I/2080
Responses
K = A*B
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,432,231
4,337,452
2,242,849
5,979,813
6,663,903
19,374,820
5,578,107
6,550,368
1,211,020
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,585,163
4,610,179
2,383,873
6,355,808
7,082,911
20,593,057
5,928,844
6,962,238
1,287,166
4,722
8,422
4,355
11,611
12,939
37,618
10,831
12,718
2,351
2.3
4.0
2.1
5.6
6.2
18.1
5.2
6.1
1.1
3,435
6,125
3,167
8,444
9,410
27,359
7,877
9,250
1,710
$
54,370,563 $
57,789,239
105,567
50.8
76,776
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
642,954
1,001,066
290,313
259,706
43,238
18,345
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
683,382
1,064,011
308,567
276,036
45,957
19,499
-
1,248
1,944
564
504
84
36
-
0.6
0.9
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
-
908
1,414
410
367
61
26
-
$
2,255,623 $
2,397,450
4,380
2.1
3,185
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,525,332
2,864,135
422,898
404,133
102,521
18,412
7,337,432
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,746,996
3,044,224
449,489
429,544
108,967
19,570
7,798,790
6,845
5,561
821
785
199
36
14,246
3.3
2.7
0.4
0.4
0.1
0.0
6.8
4,978
4,044
597
571
145
26
10,361
63,963,618 $
67,985,479
124,193
59.7
90,322
$
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column F.
(B) Semimonthly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems, plus two
matrix spike samples.
(C) Additional consultation on burden for this activity was not sought for this ICR period as this activity was completed prior to this ICR period.
(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(F) Taken from Exhibit F.6b.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-12
December 2011
Exhibit F.11 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Plan and Initial Bin
Classification Monitoring (Completed in Year 6)
System Size
(Population Served)
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Source Water
Sampling Plan
hours per plant
Bin Classification
hours per plant
A
B
Total
Cost per
hours
Labor
per plant
Hour
C=A+B
D
Baseline #
of Plants
Reporting
Total Cost
Total Burden
(Hours)
Total Burden
(FTEs)
E
F = C*D*E
G = C*E
H = G/2080
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
377
665
344
930
1,040
1,047
302
356
62
5,122
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
97,584
172,211
89,157
241,033
269,437
576,329
166,040
299,542
52,291
1,963,623
3,013
5,318
2,753
7,443
8,320
17,797
5,127
9,250
1,615
60,636
1.4
2.6
1.3
3.6
4.0
8.6
2.5
4.4
0.8
29.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
100
156
45
41
7
1
0
0
0
350
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
25,996
40,475
11,738
10,501
1,748
549
91,007
803
1,250
362
324
54
17
2,810
0.4
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
1.4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
544
444
66
63
16
1
0
0
0
1,135
6,607
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
141,048
115,059
17,099
16,340
4,145
551
294,242
2,348,872
4,355
3,553
528
505
128
17
9,086
72,532
2.1
1.7
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
4.4
34.9
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A & B) Additional consultation on burden for this activity was not sought for this ICR period as this activity was completed prior to this ICR period.
(C) Although small systems will not report E. coli and Cryptosporidium results at the same time, the additional reporting burden is assumed to be negligible.
The decrease in burden for small plants that report E. coli but are exempt from Cryptosporidium monitoring is also assumed to be negligible.
(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(E) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column D.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-13
December 2011
Exhibit F.12 Burden and Cost to States Associated with E. coli and Cryptosporidium Monitoring and Bin Determination (Initial
and Future Rounds)
Initial Monitoring for Small Systems (Completed in Year 6)
State Activity
FTEs per State
Total
for E. coli
Hours for
Monitoring
E. coli
A
B = A*2080
FTEs Per State
for Cryptosporidium
Monitoring
Total Hours for
Cryptosporidium
Total FTEs
Per State
Total Hours
Cost per
Labor Hour
C
D = C*2080
E = A+C
F = B+D
G
Analyze PWS Reports and
Make Bin Classifications
Respond to PWS
Recordkeeping
Totals per State
0.3
0.3
0.25
0.9
624
624
520
1,768
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.7
416
416
520
1,352
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.5
National Totals (57
States/Primacy Agencies)
48.5
100,776
37.1
77,064
85.5
1040 $
1040 $
1040 $
3,120
Total Cost
H = F*G
43.79
43.79
43.79
177,840
$ 45,543.68
$ 45,543.68
$ 45,543.68
$ 136,631.04
$
7,787,969
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.
1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)
Sources
(A), (C) EPA estimated FTEs based on experience with similar regulations.
(G) See Labor Rates exhibit.
Future Monitoring
State Activity
Total
FTEs per State Hours for
E. coli in
for E. coli
Small
Monitoring in
Small Systems Systems
A
B = A*2080
FTEs Per State
for Cryptosporidium
Monitoring in
Small Systems
Total Hours for
Cryptosporidium in
Small Systems
C
D = C*2080
FTEs Per
State for
Cryptosporidium
Monitoring in Total Hours for
Cryptosporidium
Medium &
in Medium &
Total FTEs
Large
Large Systems
Per State
Systems
E
F = E*2080
G = A+C+E
Analyze PWS Report and
Make Bin Classifications
Respond to PWS
Recordkeeping
Totals per State
0.2
0.2
0.25
0.7
416
416
520
1,352
0.1
0.1
0.25
0.5
208
208
520
936
0.1
0.1
0.25
0.5
208
208
520
936
0.4
0.4
0.75
1.6
National Totals (57
States/Primacy Agencies)
37.1
77,064
25.7
53,352
25.7
53,352
88.4
Total Hours
Cost per
Labor
Hour
H = B+D+F
I
832 $ 43.79
832 $ 43.79
1560 $ 43.79
3,224
183,768
Total Cost
J = H*I
$
$
$
$
36,434.94
36,434.94
68,315.52
141,185
$
8,047,568
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
All States/Primacy Agencies are assumed to incur some costs for each activity.
1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)
Sources
(A), (C), (E) EPA estimated FTEs based on experience with similar regulations.
(I) See Labor Rates exhibit.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-14
December 2011
Exhibit F.13 Burden and Cost to PWSs Associated with UCFWR Reporting (Completed in Years 1-3)
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Reporting
Use of
UCFWR
Reporting Schedule for
Covering UCFWR or
Disinfecting UCFWR Effluent
Total Hours
per PWS
Cost per
Labor Hour
Baseline # of
Systems with
UCFWRs
Total Cost
Total Burden
(Hours)
Total Burden
(FTEs)
A
B
C=A+B
D
E
F = C*D*E
G = C*E
H = G/2080
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
8.25
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
3
9
26
5
37
1
81
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
802
2,405
6,946
1,336
9,885
267
21,641
25
74
215
41
305
8
668
0.01
0.04
0.10
0.02
0.15
0.00
0.3
Notes:
Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shown for informational purposes only.
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to rounding.
NTNCWS and TNCWS do not have UCFWRs
Sources:
(A & B) Burden estimates for each activity are based on EPA experience with similar rules.
(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(E) Exhibit 4.23, Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-15
December 2011
Exhibit F.14 Burden and Cost to States and Primacy Agencies Associated
with Reviewing/Approving UCFWR Schedule (Completed in Years 1-3)
State/Primacy Agency Activity
Recording Use of UCFWR
Approving State Schedule
Baseline # of Systems with Cost per Labor
UCFWRs
Hour
B
A
81 $
43.79
81
43.79
Totals per UCFWR
Burden and Cost per State/Primacy Agency
FTEs per
UCFWR
C
0.0001
0.0005
0.0006
0.01
Hours per
UCFWR
D
0.25
1
1.25
14.46
$
$
$
$
Cost Per
UCFWR
E = B*D
10.9
43.8
54.7
633.4
Notes:
Burden shown here is assumed to have been incurred in Years 1-3 and is not included in the totals for the LT2ESWTR. It is shown for informational purposes only.
Detail may not add to totals due to rounding.
Only the seven States/Primacy Agencies with UCFWRs are assumed to incur burden and costs for these activities.
1 FTE = 2,080 hours (40 hours/week; 52 weeks/year)
Sources:
(A) Carried forward from January 2006 ICR (expert estimates).
(B) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(C) FTEs per State/Primacy Agency based on EPA experience with previous regulations.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-16
December 2011
Exhibit F.15 Burden and Cost to States Associated with Reviewing Plants' Reports on Technology
Compliance
Number Number
System Size
of Plants of Plants
(Population
Installing Installing
Served)
UV
MF/UF
A
B
<100
85
88
100-499
79
68
500-999
32
37
1,000-3,299
125
27
3,300-9,999
116
23
10,000-49,999
366
22
50,000-99,999
100
5
100,000-999,999
115
6
1,000,000+
21
1
National Totals
1,038
277
Number of
Plants
Installing
Bank
Filtration
C
Number of
Unfiltered
Plants
Installing
Ozone
D
4
1
1
0
6
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
Total Plants
E = A+B+C+D
173
147
69
154
140
392
107
122
22
1,326
Annual
Labor
Hours per
Plant
F
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
40
Labor
Rate
G
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
$ 43.79
Total
Annual
Labor
Hours
H = E*F
6,914
5,896
2,763
6,145
5,598
15,687
4,263
4,891
883
53,040
Total Annual
Costs
I = G*H
$
302,793
$
258,182
$
121,003
$
269,112
$
245,162
$
686,978
$
186,678
$
214,190
$
38,650
$ 2,322,748
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.
Sources:
(A)-(D) Taken from Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.
(F) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(G) See Labor Rates exhibit.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-17
December 2011
Exhibit F.16 Filtered and Unfiltered Plant Burden and Cost for Preparing Reports Demonstrating Technology
Compliance
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Number
Plants
Installing
UV
A
Number
Number of
Annual
of Plants
Number of
Unfiltered
Labor
Installing Plants Installing Plants Installing
Hours per
MF/UF
Bank Filtration
Ozone
Total Plants
Plant
B
C
D
E=A+B+C+D
F
Labor
Rate
G
Total
Annual
Labor
Hours
H=E*F
Total Annual
Costs
I=G*H
16
37
23
111
112
361
100
114
20
893
54
48
31
25
23
21
5
6
1
214
4
1
1
0
6
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
69
85
53
138
136
387
107
122
21
1,118
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
4,143
5,112
3,197
8,260
8,141
23,219
6,394
7,301
1,288
67,055
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
134,167
165,555
103,538
267,504
263,635
751,910
207,071
236,434
41,711
2,171,525
9
13
5
8
2
1
0
38
28
17
6
2
0
0
0
52
0
0
0
-
37
30
10
9
2
2
0
91
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
2,205
1,803
609
569
149
91
18
5,445
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
71,420
58,402
19,733
18,419
4,814
2,957
573
176,319
60
29
5
6
2
4
0
1
107
1,038
7
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
277
0
0
0
0
6
4
67
32
6
6
2
4
0
1
118
1,326
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
60
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
4,023
1,928
338
389
108
221
18
36
7,061
79,561
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
130,284
62,430
10,950
12,588
3,496
7,160
583
1,161
228,651
2,576,494
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Some unfiltered plants may install ozone treatment, but no new burden is expected to be incurred because ozone will replace the currently used
disinfectant.
UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.
Sources:
(A), (B), (C), (D) Taken from Appendix G of the LT2ESWTR Economic Analysis.
(F) Burden estimate take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(G) See Labor Rates exhibit.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-18
December 2011
Exhibit F.17 Plant Burden and Cost for Disinfection Benchmarking Reports
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWS
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Number of
Total
Number Number of Unfiltered Number of
of Plants
Plants
Plants
Plants
Annual
Installing Installing Installing Changing Labor Hours
UV
MF/UF
Ozone Disinfection per Plant
A
B
C
D = A+B+C
E
Labor Rate
F
Total
Annual
Labor
Hours
G = D*E
Total Annual
Costs
H = F*G
16
37
23
111
112
361
100
114
20
893
54
48
31
25
23
21
5
6
1
214
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
69
85
53
138
136
383
106
120
21
1,111
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
225
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
1,726
2,130
1,332
3,442
3,392
9,580
2,638
3,012
534
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
55,902.84
68,981.29
43,140.96
111,459.97
109,847.73
310,231.06
85,439.22
97,552.98
17,281.91
899,837.96
9
13
5
8
2
1
0
38
28
17
6
2
0
0
0
52
-
37
30
10
9
2
2
0
91
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
225
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
919
751
254
237
62
38
7
-
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
29,758.46
24,334.23
8,222.12
7,674.72
2,005.91
1,219.13
236.04
73,450.61
60
29
5
6
2
4
0
1
107
1,038
7
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
277
4
67
32
6
6
2
4
0
1
118
1,320
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
225
675
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
1,676
803
141
162
45
91
7
15
$ 54,284.86
$ 26,012.38
$
4,562.52
$
5,244.97
$
1,456.55
$
2,951.51
$
$
240.44
$
480.54
$ 95,233.77
$ 1,068,522.34
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
This ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and
profiling burden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they will
be added in future ICRs.
UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.
Sources:
(A) - (C) From Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.
(E) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(G) See Labor Rates exhibit.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-19
December 2011
Exhibit F.18 State Burden and Cost for Disinfection Benchmarking Reports
System Size
(Population
Served)
Number Number of
of Plants
Plants
Installing Installing
UV
MF/UF
A
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
85
79
32
125
116
366
100
115
21
1,038
B
Number of
Plants
Installing
Ozone
C
88
68
37
27
23
22
5
6
1
277
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
Total
Number of
Plants
Changing Labor Hours
Disinfection
per Plant
D=A+B+
C
E
173
16
147
16
69
16
154
16
140
16
388
16
106
16
121
16
22
16
1,320
144
Labor Rate
F
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
394.13
Total Labor
Hours
G = D*E
2,766
2,358
1,105
2,458
2,239
6,213
1,689
1,937
351
Total Costs
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
H = F*G
121,117.04
103,272.87
48,401.06
107,644.95
98,064.81
272,100.38
73,943.76
84,840.04
15,372.60
924,757.51
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
This ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling
burden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they will be added in future
ICRs.
UV stands for ultraviolet disinfection and MF/UF stands for microfiltration/ultrafiltration.
Sources:
(A) - (C) From Appendix G of the Economic Analysis for the LT2ESWTR.
(E) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(F) See Labor Rates exhibit.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-20
December 2011
Exhibit F.19 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with E. coli Monitoring for Bin Reclassification
Sampling
System Size
(Population
Served)
Baseline #
of Plants
Conducting # of E.
coli
E. coli
Monitoring Samples
A
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Sample Analysis
Hours
per
Sample
Cost per
Labor
Hour
Total
Sampling
Labor Cost
C
D
E = A*B*C*D
B
Utility
Commercial Analysis
Hours per
Analysis
Sample
(Includes
(Labor)
Shipping)
F
G
H=I-G*D
Utility
Percent
Analysis Utilities with
Total Laboratory Total Laboratory
E. coli
Cost per
Analysis Cost
Analysis Cost
Analysis
Sample
(O&M)
(Labor)
Capabilities
(Total)
L = F*A*B*(1I
J
K = D*G*J*A*B
J)+H*A*B*J
Utility
Analysis
Cost per
Sample
(O&M)
300
588
304
823
922
713
206
245
43
4,145
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
$ 252,744
$ 494,777
$ 256,156
$ 693,199
$ 776,642
$ 554,533
$ 159,864
$ 190,331
$
33,237
$ 3,411,481
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
15,796.48
30,923.54
16,009.78
43,324.91
48,540.11
103,974.85
29,974.48
47,582.74
8,309.15
344,436
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
587,006
1,149,136
594,932
1,609,978
1,803,777
657,510
189,551
117,489
20,516
6,729,895
80
138
40
36
6
1
301
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
67,330
116,290
33,725
30,199
5,039
528
253,110
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,208.15
7,268.10
2,107.79
1,887.43
314.95
98.96
15,885
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
156,377
270,087
78,327
70,138
11,704
626
587,258
516
421
63
57
14
1
1,071
26
26
26
26
26
24
24
24
24
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
434,262
354,246
52,644
47,970
12,196
541
901,860
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
93.62
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
19.99
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
28.09
25%
25%
25%
25%
25%
75%
75%
100%
100%
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
27,141.39
22,140.38
3,290.26
2,998.14
762.26
101.46
56,434
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,008,589
822,749
122,268
111,412
28,326
642
2,093,986
5,516
$ 4,566,451
$
416,755 $
Total Cost
M = E+K+L
$
855,546
$ 1,674,836
$
867,098
$ 2,346,501
$ 2,628,959
$ 1,316,018
$
379,389
$
355,402
$
62,062
$ 10,485,812
Total
Total
Burden
Burden
(Hours)
(FTEs)
Responses
N = A*B*C+
A*B*G*J
O = N/2,080
P = A*B
8,292
16,233
8,404
22,743
25,481
20,334
5,862
7,347
1,283
115,981
4.0
7.8
4.0
10.9
12.3
9.8
2.8
3.5
0.6
55.8
7,805
15,278
7,910
21,406
23,982
17,124
4,937
5,877
1,026
105,345
227,916
393,644
114,159
102,224
17,058
1,252
856,254
2,209
3,815
1,106
991
165
19
8,306
1.1
1.8
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.0
4.0
2,079
3,591
1,041
933
156
16
7,816
$ 1,469,993
$ 1,199,135
$
178,202
$
162,381
$
41,284
$
1,284
$
$
$
$ 3,052,279
14,248
11,623
1,727
1,574
400
20
29,592
6.8
5.6
0.8
0.8
0.2
0.0
14.2
13,410
10,939
1,626
1,481
377
17
27,849
9,411,139 $ 14,394,345
153,879
74.0
141,009
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column I.
(B) Bi-weekly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems.
(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping; estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(F) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, June 2002. Updated to $2010.
(G) Estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(H) The amount left over after the cost of labor is subtracted from the cost of utility analysis provided in Column I.
(I) DynCorp study, Kevin Connell, December 2000. Updated to $2010.
(J) Estimate based on Third Edition Baseline Handbook data.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-21
December 2011
Exhibit F.20 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Cryptosporidium Monitoring for Bin Reclassification
System Size
(Population
Served)
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
Sampling
Baseline # of
Plants
Conducting
Cryptosporidium
Monitoring
# of Cryptosporidium
Samples
A
B
Sample Analysis
Hours per Cost per
Sample Labor Hour
C
D
Total
Sampling
Labor Cost
Cost per
Sample
Total Laboratory
Analysis Cost
(O&M)
Total Cost
E = A*B*C*D
F
G = A*B*F
H = E+G
Total
Burden
(FTEs) Responses
J=
I = A*B*C I/2080
K = A*B
Total
Burden
(Hours)
104
204
106
287
321
713
206
245
43
2,229
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
120,938
236,751
122,571
331,696
371,623
826,022
238,131
283,514
49,509
2,580,753
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
708
3,765,278
1,949,365
5,275,281
5,910,288
13,137,049
3,787,225
4,509,000
787,386
39,121,581
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
121,646
4,002,029
2,071,936
5,606,977
6,281,911
13,963,072
4,025,356
4,792,514
836,894
41,702,335
3,734
7,311
3,785
10,243
11,476
25,507
7,353
8,755
1,529
79,692
1.8
3.5
1.8
4.9
5.5
12.3
3.5
4.2
0.7
38.3
2,716
5,317
2,753
7,449
8,346
18,551
5,348
6,367
1,112
57,958
28
48
14
12
2
1
105
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32,218
55,645
16,137
14,450
2,411
786
121,647
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
512,388
884,971
256,646
229,815
38,348
12,503
1,934,672
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
544,606
940,615
272,783
244,266
40,760
13,289
2,056,319
995
1,718
498
446
74
24
3,756
0.5
0.8
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
1.8
724
1,250
362
325
54
18
2,732
179
146
22
20
5
1
373
2,707
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
207,794
169,507
25,190
22,954
5,836
806
432,087
3,134,487
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
708.17
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,304,761
2,695,833
400,625
365,056
92,813
12,819
6,871,906
47,928,159
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,512,555
2,865,339
425,815
388,010
98,649
13,625
7,303,993
51,062,646
6,417
5,234
778
709
180
25
13,343
96,791
3.1
2.5
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.0
6.4
46.5
4,667
3,807
566
515
131
18
9,704
70,394
Notes:
Detail may not add exactly to totals due to independent rounding.
(A) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column J.
(B) Semimonthly source water monitoring for one year for small systems and monthly samples for 24 months for medium and large systems, plus two matrix spike
samples.
Assume unfiltered plants achieve 3 log removal due to treatment installed following initialCryptosporidium
monitoring, and are therefore exempt from future Cryptosporidium monitoring.
(C) Estimate of labor for collecting sample and shipping; estimate takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(F) Taken from Exhibit F.6b.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-22
December 2011
Exhibit F.21 Burden and Cost to Plants Associated with Reporting for Source Water Sampling Schedule and Bin ReClassification Monitoring
System Size
(Population Served)
Hours
Bin Reper
Classification hours
Plant
per plant
Source Water
Sampling Plan
hours per plant
A
CWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
NTNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
TNCWSs
<100
100-499
500-999
1,000-3,299
3,300-9,999
10,000-49,999
50,000-99,999
100,000-999,999
1,000,000+
National Totals
Grand Totals
B
Cost per
Labor Hour
Baseline # of
Plants
Reporting
Total Cost
Total Burden
(Hours)
Total Burden
(FTEs)
D
E
F = C*D*E
G = C*E
H = G/2080
C=A+B
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
300
588
304
823
922
713
206
245
43
4,145
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
77,767
152,239
78,817
213,292
238,967
392,794
113,237
206,192
36,006
1,509,311
2,401
4,701
2,434
6,586
7,379
12,129
3,497
6,367
1,112
46,607
1.2
2.3
1.2
3.2
3.5
5.8
1.7
3.1
0.5
22.4
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
80
138
40
36
6
1
301
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
20,717
35,781
10,377
9,292
1,551
374
,
78,092
640
1,105
320
287
48
12
2,411
,
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
1.2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
7
7
7
7
7
16
16
16
16
8
8
8
8
8
17
17
26
26
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
32.38
516
421
63
57
14
1
1,071
5,516
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
133,619
108,999
16,198
14,760
3,753
383
277,712
1,865,115
4,126
3,366
500
456
116
12
8,576
57,594
2.0
1.6
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
4.1
27.7
Sources
(A), (B) Estimates takes into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
(D) See Labor Rates exhibit.
(E) Taken from Exhibit F.6a, column I.
Assume unfiltered plants achieve 3 log removal due to treatment installed following initial Cryptosporidium monitoring, and are therefore exempt from future
Cryptosporidium monitoring.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-23
December 2011
Exhibit F.22 12-Year Summary of Burden Associated with Implementing the LT2ESWTR (Hours)
Activity
CWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Total
NTNCWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Totals
TNCWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Totals
States and Territories
Start-up
Bin Determination and
Reviewing Monitoring Data [7]
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR
Schedule [8]
Technology Reporting [9]
Disinfection Benchmarking [10]
Yearly Totals
Grand Totals
Source
Exhibit F.7, Column G
Exhibit F.9, Column N
Exhibit F.10, Column I
Exhibit F.11, Column G
Exhibit F.13, Column G
Exhibit F.16, Column H
Exhibit F.17, Column G
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
16,510
14,625
217,149
3,134
3,767
2,740
334
10,566
12,950
8,055
334
68,703
27,992
25,334
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
61,271
18,809
20,019
21,024
2,382
21,024
2,382
973
2,195
3,153
8,031
5,798
Year 8
21,795
5,798
Year 9
42,138
4,825
Exhibit F.19, Column N
Exhibit F.20, Column I
Exhibit F.21, Column G
26,485
46,530
339,178 101,072
Exhibit F.7, Column G
-
-
18,160
Exhibit F.9, Column N
Exhibit F.10, Column I
Exhibit F.11, Column G
Exhibit F.13, Column G
Exhibit F.16, Column H
Exhibit F.17, Column G
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,837
18
1,161
25,601
26,559
4,837
18
1,161
2,172
244
2,172
244
1
5
9
0
0
24,176
-
-
56,881
Exhibit F.9, Column N
Exhibit F.10, Column I
Exhibit F.11, Column G
Exhibit F.13, Column G
Exhibit F.16, Column H
Exhibit F.17, Column G
0
0
0
0
0
0
15,714
18
3,749
6,017
2,422
2,425
15,714
18
3,749
7,105
806
7,105
806
4
14
23
Exhibit F.7, Column E, and
Exhibit F.8, Column C
Exhibit F.12, Column B,
Column D
0
76,363
13,574
12,024
312,298
50,388
Exhibit F.14, Column C
Exhibit F.15, Column H
Exhibit F.18, Column G
51
13,574
40,059
12,075
58,605
19,486
50,388
7,924
38,532
7,934
Year 12
50,307
3,603
61,285
1,322
67,055
5,780
6,980
12,329
15,195
52,210
14,592
27,593
46,963
4,667
71,337
11
498
55
498
2,216
497
2,768
493
4,377
245
5,445
8,602
16,724
98,734 150,582
5
6
3
4,636
4,153
12
997
10,607
509
553
2,712
0
0
0
3,261
32
645
143
645
2,923
640
3,646
631
5,703
311
7,061
3,563
0
0
0
4,277
5
6
0
6,026
14,796
12
3,553
25,422
12,311
26,822
76,705
Exhibit F.19, Column N
Exhibit F.20, Column I
Exhibit F.21, Column G
0
Year 11
13,829
Exhibit F.19, Column N
Exhibit F.20, Column I
Exhibit F.21, Column G
Exhibit F.7, Column G
Year 10
677
787
38,532
51
627
362,736 51,015
802,452 177,590
1417
39,949
75,896
2038
40,570
77,488
5,382
4442
9,824
24,839
14,662
4442
19,104
48,038
31,518
37,813
47,577
53,040
3815
3025
1202
35,333
53,150
75,601 129,746
88,572 132,024 184,996 316,356
Notes:
This ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling burden and costs associated with systems
changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are not yet available; they will be added in future ICRs.
[1] Start-up burden is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
[2] The first round of E. coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring was completed during the previous ICR clearance period.
[3] Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
[4] Systems must begin to demonstrate compliance with technologies 42 months following the completion of Cryptosporidium monitoring.
[5] Disinfection profiling must be completed prior to changing the disinfection process. Thus, the schedule reflects treatment installation.
[6] Assessments for re-binning: A second round of E. coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring for re-binning for a given system will begin 6.5 years after that system's completion of initial
monitoring.
[7] In the first round of monitoring, States will perform these activities for small systems only; States will perform these activities for all systems during future
monitoring.
[8] State activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed during Years 2-3.
[9] State activities will parallel system activities.
[10] State activities will parallel system activities.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-24
December 2011
Exhibit F.23 12-Year Summary of Cost Associated with Implementing the LT2ESWTR
Activity
CWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Total
NTNCWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Totals
TNCWSs
Start-up [1]
Assessment for Binning [2]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
UCFWR Reporting [3]
Technology Reporting [4]
Disinfection Benchmarking [5]
Assessment for Bin
Reclassification [6]
E. coli Monitoring
Cryptosporidium Monitoring
Reporting
Yearly Totals
States and Territories
Source
Year 1
Exhibit F.7, Column F
Exhibit F.9, Column M
Exhibit F.10, Column H
Exhibit F.11, Column F
Exhibit F.13, Column F
Exhibit F.16, Column
Exhibit F.17, Column H
Year 2
Year 3
534,660
473,616
7,032,147
151,609
2,062,351
88,730
10,820
581,368
7,089,124
260,852
10,820
6,177,637
15,323,301
820,409
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
5,747,877
10,296,528
648,287
11,508,967
77,152
11,508,967
77,152
31,511
71,078
102,101
Year 7
Year 8
260,069
187,754
Year 9
705,825
187,754
1,364,605
156,243
Exhibit F.19, Column M
Exhibit F.20, Column H
Exhibit F.21, Column F
$ 2,848,170
$ 8,415,780
$ 29,353,493 $ 16,724,204 $ 11,657,197 $ 11,688,220 $447,823
Exhibit F.7, Column F
-
-
588,097
Exhibit F.9, Column M
Exhibit F.10, Column H
Exhibit F.11, Column F
Exhibit F.13, Column F
Exhibit F.16, Column I
Exhibit F.17, Column H
0
0
0
0
0
0
498,501
9,749
37,588
498,501
9,749
37,588
1,188,976
7,915
1,188,976
7,915
47
169
291
$
344
16,130
893,579
Year 10
$ 1,520,849
1,789
16,130
1,629,134
116,676
$
-
$
-
$ 1,133,936
-
-
1,842,049
Exhibit F.9, Column M
Exhibit F.10, Column H
Exhibit F.11, Column F
Exhibit F.13, Column F
Exhibit F.16, Column I
Exhibit F.17, Column H
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,620,701
9,785
121,423
$
545,886
$ 1,197,060
$ 1,197,182
1,620,701
9,785
121,423
3,889,610
26,087
3,889,610
26,087
144
439
734
$ 16,474
$
1,046
20,878
17,919
71,758
16,083
$
4,617
20,878
87,841
$
Start-up
Bin Determination and
Reviewing Monitoring Data [7] Exhibit F.12, Column G,
Column I
Reviewing/Approving UCFWR
Exhibit F.14, Column D
Schedule [8]
Technology Reporting [9]
Exhibit F.15, Column I
Disinfection Benchmarking [10 Exhibit F.18, Column H
Yearly Totals
Grand Totals
-
$
594,431
$
-
$ 594,431
$ 3,442,601
-
$ 3,593,959
$ 1,752,054
$ 3,916,136
$ 3,916,431
$ 21,924
$
25,495
$ 2,206,591 $ 2,206,591
$ 1,687,393
$ 1,687,393
$
$
-
526,563
$
-
$
2,217
$ 528,780
$ 8,944,560
1,984,645
42,827
89,628
15,961
$
94,655
20,734
2,171,525
141,761
7,919
0
0
0
105,589 $
118,061
20,439
Exhibit F.19, Column M
Exhibit F.20, Column H
Exhibit F.21, Column F
Exhibit .7, Column E,
Exhibit F.8, Column D
Year 12
303,580
727,431
4,939,327
3,821,043
8,318,150
7,987,875
151,138
278,575
27,175
$ 6,021,571 $ 11,351,628 $ 15,125,901
Exhibit F.19, Column M
Exhibit F.20, Column H
Exhibit F.21, Column F
Exhibit F.7, Column F
Year 11
313
3,322
93
153,409 $
184,701
10,072
$ 115,388
$
0
0
0
138,500 $
$
$
539,121
176,319
428,127
6,645
32,284
643,374
228,651
321
1,526,140
3,406
6,812
96
115,049
198,596 $ 1,876,652
13,676,147
$
-
-
$ 1,174,578
$ 3,359,084
2,217
235,709
642,087
1,380,236
1,655,924
2,083,498
2,322,748
27,437
62041
89251
194522
194522
167085
132480
52635
$ 15,884,956 $ 2,234,028 $ 1,749,435 $ 1,776,645 $430,231 $ 836,608 $ 1,547,320 $ 2,327,525 $ 3,310,711 $ 5,681,833
$ 49,966,343 $ 21,256,172 $ 18,519,827 $ 18,578,478 $916,452 $ 1,773,601 $ 3,271,398 $ 8,593,186 $ 15,014,344 $ 23,327,760
Notes:
This ICR only characterizes burden and costs associated with systems complying with LT2ESWTR. Estimates of disinfection and profiling burden and costs associated with systems changing treatment to comply with Stage 2 DBPR are
not yet available; they will be added in future ICRs.
[1] Start-up is assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
[2] The first round of E. coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring was completed during the previous ICR clearance period.
[3] Activities associated with uncovered finished water reservoirs are assumed to have been completed in Years 1-3.
[4] Systems must begin to demonstrate compliance with technologies 42 months following the completion of
Cryptosporidium monitoring.
[5] Disinfection profiling must be completed prior to changing the disinfection process. Thus, the schedule reflects treatment installation.
[6] Assessments for re-binning: A second round ofE. coli and Cryptosporidium monitoring for re-binning for a given system will begin 6.5 years after that system's completion of initial monitoring.
[7] In the first round of monitoring, States will perform these activities for small systems only; States will perform these activities for all systems during future monitoring.
[8] States are assumed to have completed review of uncovered finished water reservoir reports during Years 2-3.
[9] State activities will parallel system activities.
[10] State activities will parallel system activities.
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
F-25
December 2011
Exhibit F.24 Implementation Timeline for the LT2ESWTR
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Year 11
Year 12
Year 13
Systems Serving 100,000 People
Crypto Monitoring
Treatment Installation
2nd Round Crypto Mon.
Possible Extension
Systems Serving 50,000-99,999 People
Treatment Installation
Crypto Monitoring
2nd Round Crypto Mon.
Possible Extension
Systems Serving 10,000-49,999 People
Treatment Installation
Crypto Monitoring
2nd Round Crypto Mon.
Possible Extension
Systems Serving < 10,000 People
Filtered Only
E. coli Mon.
Filtered Only
Crypto Mon.
Treatment Installation
(Opt)
Possible Extension
2nd Round E. coli Mon.
Year 1
Year 2
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
F-26
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Year 11
Year 12
Year 13
December 2011
Exhibit F.25
Long Term 2 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule (LT2) Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
2008 Burden
10 min
Microbial Rules ICR - LT2ESWTR
Task
E. coli sample analysis (by utility)
F-27
Revised Burden
15 min
December 2011
Appendix G
Ground Water Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit G.1 Labor Rates
Cost Assumptions: State Labor Rate Components
Base Hourly ECI in Year of
Labor Cost
Data
A
Cost Element
$
Field Engineer
B
58.86
ECI
2010
2010 Labor
Cost
C
D=A*(C/B)
-
- $
58.86
$
43.79
- $
43.79
State Employee
Sources: (A) Field engineer wage rates from National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC
Code 17-2051 , "State Government - Civil Engineers," hourly mean wage rate. May 2010 data (published in May 2011).
http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes172051.htm. Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.
State Employee wage rates from National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 192041, "State Government - Environmental Scientists and Specialists, Including Health," hourly mean wage rate. May 2010 data
(published in May 2011). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes192041.htm Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits.
(B) - (C) Not required (source data is in 2010$)
Technical Wage Rates by System Size
Rate
Base Wage Rate ($2010)
Loaded Wage Rate ($2010)
Inflated Wage Rate ($2010)
25-100
$ 20.24
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
101-500
$
20.24
$
32.38
$
32.38
System size
500-3.3k
3.3k-10k
$
20.24 $
20.24
$
32.38 $
32.38
$
32.38 $
32.38
$
$
$
10k-100k
20.24
32.38
32.38
>100k
$ 20.24
$ 32.38
$ 32.38
Source: National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates, United States, BLS SOC Code 51-8031, "Local Government - Water and
Liquid Waste Treatment Plant and System Operators". May 2010 data (published in May 2011). http://stats.bls.gov/oes/current/oes518031.htm.
Multiplied by a loading rate of 1.6 to account for benefits. Wage rate is not inflated because source data year matches dollar year.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G-1
December 2011
Exhibit G.2 Number of Systems Subject to Sanitary Surveys
System Size
(Population Served)
Systems
A
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
≤100
11,683
101-500
13,737
501-1,000
4,463
1,001-3,300
5,964
3,301-10K
3,108
10,001-50K
1,661
50,001-100K
192
100,001-1 Million
104
5
> 1 Million
Totals
40,918
Systems
Disinfecting
B
Systems
Disinfecting;
4-log
C
Systems
Not
Disinfecting
D=A-B
6,117
9,306
3,559
5,013
2,736
1,531
177
104
5
28,548
3,181
4,839
1,851
2,607
1,423
796
92
54
5
14,847
5,566
4,431
903
951
372
131
15
12,370
11,683
13,737
4,463
5,964
3,108
1,661
192
104
5
40,918
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
8,571
2,901
101-500
6,467
2,735
501-1,000
1,660
872
1,001-3,300
763
524
3,301-10K
103
83
10,001-50K
12
9
50,001-100K
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
17,576
7,123
899
848
270
162
26
3
2,208
5,670
3,732
788
239
20
3
10,453
8,571
6,467
1,660
763
103
12
17,576
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
≤100
59,238
13,793
1,379
45,445
101-500
19,358
5,504
550
13,854
501-1,000
1,965
700
70
1,265
1,001-3,300
568
247
25
321
3,301-10K
66
28
3
38
10,001-50K
6
2
0
4
50,001-100K
3
3
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
81,204
20,274
2,027
60,930
Total All Systems
139,698
55,945
19,083
83,752
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.
(B) Column (A) times percent disinfecting. Percent disinfecting from SDWIS/FED 2010 data.
(C) Percentage of systems disinfecting to 4-log based on AWWA (1998).
(E) Based on rule requirements, all systems are subject to sanitary surveys.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
Systems
Performing
Sanitary
Survey
E
G-2
59,238
19,358
1,965
568
66
6
3
81,204
139,698
December 2011
Exhibit G.3 Number of Entry Points Subject to Triggered Monitoring
Entry Points
Triggered
Monitoring
A
Mean
Number
of Samples
per EP per Year
B
Triggered
Monitoring
Samples/year
C=A*B
Average Positive
Triggered
Monitoring
Entry Points/year
D
System Size
(Population Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
≤100
9,276
0.38
3,510
101-500
10,857
0.41
4,451
501-1,000
4,132
0.49
2,045
1,001-3,300
6,230
0.22
1,381
3,301-10K
3,697
0.58
2,142
10,001-50K
3,059
2.21
6,747
50,001-100K
941
6.56
6,174
100,001-1 Million
627
10.63
6,666
> 1 Million
10.63
Totals
38,820
33,116
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
7,672
0.22
1,681
101-500
5,619
0.23
1,264
501-1,000
1,390
0.28
391
1,001-3,300
601
0.70
422
3,301-10K
77
1.84
142
10,001-50K
9
6.99
64
50,001-100K
20.78
100,001-1 Million
33.67
> 1 Million
33.67
Totals
15,368
3,965
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
≤100
57,859
0.47
27,062
101-500
18,808
0.48
9,032
501-1,000
1,895
0.60
1,138
1,001-3,300
543
1.10
599
3,301-10K
63
2.88
182
10,001-50K
6
10.97
64
50,001-100K
3
32.60
98
100,001-1 Million
52.83
> 1 Million
52.83
Totals
79,177
38,174
Grand Total
133,364
75,255
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
- (no PWSs of this size category).
Source:
(A) Number of entry points from Chapter 6, Exhibit 6.5b of the GWR EA, updated to current values by
52
71
27
33
30
34
12
6
264
28
23
6
4
1
0
62
289
94
10
3
0
0
0
396
723
multiplying by proportion of 2010 systems to original systems.
(B) Mean triggered samples per system calculated from Chapter 6, Exhibit 6.15 of the GWR EA.
(D) Values in Column D, total entry points with positive triggered monitoring samples (Ex. G17b, col. D),
divided by 22 years to obtain positive triggered monitoring EPs/year.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G-3
December 2011
Exhibit G.4 Number of Systems Subject to Compliance Monitoring
Systems
Subject to
Compliance
Monitoring
System Size
(Population
A
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
≤100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
4,223
6,114
2,220
2,994
1,726
1,009
120
65
5
Entry Points
Subject to
Compliance
Monitoring
Entry Points
Achieving
4-log Prior
to GWR
Entry Points Corrected
to 4-log as a result of GWR;
previously partially
disinfected
Entry Points Corrected
to 4-log as a result of GWR;
previously
nondisinfected
B=C+D+E
C
D
E
4,607
7,460
3,512
5,556
3,785
3,566
1,126
817
63
3,470
5,905
2,928
4,837
3,120
2,813
865
680
63
326
877
346
399
381
630
107
95
-
811
678
238
320
284
123
153
43
-
Totals
18,475
30,493
24,682
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
1,409
1,522
899
101-500
979
1,358
848
501-1,000
362
401
270
1,001-3,300
177
254
162
3,301-10K
28
40
26
10,001-50K
3
5
3
50,001-100K
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
2,957
3,580
2,208
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
≤100
1,590
7,735
1,379
101-500
624
2,616
550
501-1,000
80
281
70
1,001-3,300
26
98
25
3,301-10K
3
13
3
10,001-50K
0
1
0
50,001-100K
1
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
2,323
10,745
2,027
Grand Total
23,756
44,818
28,918
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
Source:
(A) Exhibit G17a, Column I
3,160
2,651
136
114
29
20
3
0
302
487
397
102
71
11
1
1,069
1,051
344
35
12
2
0
0
1,444
4,906
5,305
1,722
176
61
9
1
0
7,274
10,994
(C) Based on percentages from AWWA (1998).
(D) Chapter 6 GWR EA, Exhibit 6.5b, Column E updated using ratio of 2010 systems to original systems.
(E) Chapter 6 GWR EA, Exhibit 6.5b, Column F updated using ratio of 2010 systems to original systems.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G-4
December 2011
Exhibit G.5 Estimated System Burden and Costs for Start-Up Activities
Exhibit G.5a Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (CWSs)
Cost Component
Read and Understand Rule
Planning and Mobilization
Total hours 1
2
Labor cost (per hour)
Total cost per system
Number of Systems
Total labor burden
Total cost
≤100
Service Population Category
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
48
48
48
48
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38
1,036 $
1,036 $
1,036 $
1,036 $
1,554 $
1,554 $
1,554 $
1,554
13,737
4,463
5,964
3,108
1,661
192
104
5
439,587
142,804
190,859
99,463
79,748
9,211
4,995
243
14,235,599 $ 4,624,569 $
6,180,763 $
3,221,018 $
2,582,544 $
298,278 $
161,767 $
7,855
101-500
16
16
32
$
32.38 $
$
1,036 $
11,683
373,861
$ 12,107,112 $
Exhibit G.5b Microbial Source Water Monitoring & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up (NCWSs)
≤100
101-500
Cost Component
Read and Understand Rule
Planning and Mobilization
Total hours 1
2
Labor cost (per hour)
Total cost per system
$
$
Number of Systems
Total labor burden
Total cost
67,809
1,627,416
$ 52,702,240
8
16
24
32.38 $
777 $
$
501-1,000
8
16
24
32.38 $
777 $
25,825
619,800
20,071,603
Service Population Category
3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
8
8
8
8
8
8
16
16
16
16
16
16
24
24
24
24
24
24
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38
777 $
777 $
777 $
777 $
777 $
777
1,001-3,300
8
16
24
32.38 $
777 $
3,625
87,000
$ 2,817,408
$
1,331
31,944
1,034,474
169
4,056
131,350
$
$
18
432
13,990
$
3
72
2,332
$
-
-
$
Exhibit G.5c Sanitary Survey Start-Up
Service Population Category
≤100
Cost Component
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
Read and Understand Rule
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Planning and Mobilization
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Total hours 1
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
Labor cost (per hour)
Total cost per system
Number of Systems
Total labor burden
Total cost
Notes:
$
$
$
32.38
97
79,492
238,476
7,722,822
$
$
$
32.38
97
39,562
118,686
3,843,538
$
$
$
32.38
97
8,088
24,263
785,729
$
$
$
32.38
97
7,295
21,886
708,756
$
$
$
32.38
97
3,277
9,832
318,389
$
$
$
32.38
97
1,679
5,038
163,158
$
$
$
32.38
97
195
585
18,934
$
$
$
32.38
97
104
312
10,110
3
$
$
$
1) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
3) These activities were completed in a prior ICR period.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G-5
December 2011
32.38
97
5
15
491
Exhibit G.6 Estimated State Burden and Costs for Start-Up Activities
Exhibit G.6a Microbial Source & Compliance Monitoring Start-Up
Labor Cost
(per hour)
A
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
43.79
Hours
FTEs
Cost
Compliance Activity
B
C=B/2,080
D=A*B
Read and Understand Rule
$
60
0.03 $
2,628
Regulation Adoption and Program Development
$
1,040
0.50 $
45,544
Initial Laboratory Certification
$
800
0.38 $
35,034
Modify Data Management Systems
$
2,080
1.00 $
91,087
System Training and Technical Assistance
$
2,080
1.00 $
91,087
Staff Training
$
520
0.25 $
22,772
Per State Total
6,580
$
288,151
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
375,060
$ 16,424,628
Notes:
Detail may not add due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1
(B) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.
(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
Exhibit G.6b Annual Administrative Activities
Labor Cost
(per hour)
Hours
FTEs
Cost
Compliance Activity
A
B
C=B/2,080
D=A*B
Coordination with EPA
$
43.79
1,040
0.50 $
45,544
Lab Certification
$
43.79
1,040
0.50 $
45,544
Ongoing Technical Assistance
$
43.79
1,040
0.50 $
45,544
SDWIS Reporting
$
43.79
1,040
0.50 $
45,544
Recordkeeping
$
43.79
880
0.42 $
38,537
Staff Training
$
43.79
104
0.05 $
4,554
Per State Total
5,144
$
225,266
National Totals (57 States/Primacy Agencies)
293,208
$ 12,840,165
Notes:
Detail may not add due to independent rounding.
These activities were completed in a prior ICR period.
Sources:
(A) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1
(B) Labor hours for start-up activities reflect EPA estimate.
(C) Full-time equivalent (FTE) assumes individual working 40 hours per week, 52 weeks per year.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G-6
December 2011
Exhibit G.7a PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and
Incremental Sanitary Surveys (Treatment)
System Size
(Population
Served)
Labor
Cost
(per hour)
A
Review/
Inspect
Wells
B
Review/
Inspect
Treatment
C
Report
Review/
Review and
Inspect
Distribution Discussion w/
State
System
D
E
Total
Unit Burden
(hours)
F=sum(B-E)
Unit Cost
(Full Survey)
G=A*F
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
≤100
$
32.38
1.1
0.8
1.2
1.3
4.4
$
144
101-500
$
32.38
1.2
0.8
1.2
1.3
4.5
$
145
501-1,000
$
32.38
1.5
1.1
1.7
1.3
5.6
$
181
1,001-3,300
$
32.38
2.2
1.3
2.9
1.4
7.7
$
250
3,301-10K
$
32.38
2.7
1.6
3.6
1.8
9.6
$
309
10,001-50K
$
32.38
3.7
2.0
4.3
1.9
11.8
$
383
50,001-100K
$
32.38
9.0
3.0
12.0
3.0
27.0
$
874
100,000-1M
$
32.38
15.0
8.0
24.0
3.0
50.0
$
1,619
36.0
4.0
74.0
$
1,619
>1,000,000
$
32.38
24.0
10.0
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
$
32.38
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.3
4.0
$
131
101-500
$
32.38
1.0
0.8
1.1
1.3
4.2
$
135
501-1,000
$
32.38
1.1
0.9
1.3
1.3
4.6
$
149
1,001-3,300
$
32.38
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
4.7
$
152
3,301-10K
$
32.38
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.5
6.2
$
200
10,001-50K
$
32.38
1.5
1.5
1.8
1.5
6.3
$
202
50,001-100K
$
32.38
8.0
1.5
2.3
1.5
13.3
$
429
100,000-1M
$
32.38
8.0
1.5
10.0
1.5
21.0
$
>1,000,000
$
32.38
NA
NA
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
NA
NA
NA
680
NA
≤100
$
32.38
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.9
2.7
$
89
101-500
$
32.38
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.9
2.7
$
89
501-1,000
$
32.38
1.0
0.8
1.0
0.9
3.7
$
121
1,001-3,300
$
32.38
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
4.1
$
133
3,301-10K
$
32.38
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.2
4.8
$
157
10,001-50K
$
32.38
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.2
5.0
$
160
50,001-100K
$
32.38
8.0
1.3
1.3
1.2
11.8
$
381
100,000-1M
$
32.38
8.0
1.3
10.0
1.2
20.5
$
664
>1,000,000
Note:
$
32.38
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
2) Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10%
of systems that do not already comply with rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).
(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G-7
December 2011
Exhibit G.7b PWS Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full
and Incremental Sanitary Surveys (No Treatment)
System Size
(Population
Served)
Labor
Cost
(per hour)
A
Review/
Inspect
Wells
B
Review/
Inspect
Distribution
System
C
Report
Review and
Discussion
w/ State
D
Total
Unit Burden
(hours)
E=sum(B-D)
Unit Cost
(Full Survey)
F=A*E
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
≤100
$
32.38
1.1
1.2
1.3
3.6
$
118
101-500
$
32.38
1.2
1.2
1.3
3.7
$
118
146
501-1,000
$
32.38
1.5
1.7
1.3
4.5
$
1,001-3,300
$
32.38
2.2
2.9
1.4
6.4
$
208
3,301-10K
$
32.38
2.7
3.6
1.8
8.0
$
258
318
10,001-50K
$
32.38
3.7
4.3
1.9
9.8
$
50,001-100K
$
32.38
9.0
12.0
3.0
24.0
$
777
100,000-1M
$
32.38
15.0
24.0
3.0
42.0
$
1,360
>1,000,000
$
32.38
24.0
36.0
4.0
64.0
$
1,360
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
$
32.38
1.0
1.0
1.3
3.3
$
106
101-500
$
32.38
1.0
1.1
1.3
3.4
$
110
501-1,000
$
32.38
1.1
1.3
1.3
3.7
$
121
1,001-3,300
$
32.38
1.1
1.2
1.3
3.6
$
117
3,301-10K
$
32.38
1.5
1.7
1.5
4.7
$
151
10,001-50K
$
32.38
1.5
1.8
1.5
4.8
$
154
50,001-100K
$
32.38
8.0
2.3
1.5
11.8
$
381
100,000-1M
$
32.38
8.0
10.0
1.5
19.5
$
>1,000,000
$
32.38
NA
NA
NA
NA
631
NA
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
≤100
$
32.38
0.7
0.6
0.9
2.2
$
70
101-500
$
32.38
0.7
0.6
0.9
2.2
$
70
501-1,000
$
32.38
1.0
1.0
0.9
2.9
$
94
1,001-3,300
$
32.38
1.0
1.0
1.1
3.1
$
100
3,301-10K
$
32.38
1.2
1.2
1.2
3.5
$
113
10,001-50K
$
32.38
1.2
1.3
1.2
3.7
$
118
50,001-100K
$
32.38
8.0
1.3
1.2
10.5
$
338
100,000-1M
$
32.38
8.0
10.0
1.2
19.2
$
622
>1,000,000
Note:
$
32.38
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry
representatives.
2) Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an
incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already comply with rule requirements (see
Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).
(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a
distribution system.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G-8
December 2011
Exhibit G.7c State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental Sanitary Surveys
(Treatment)
Labor
Review/
Cost
Inspect
System Size
(per hour)
Wells
(Population
A
B
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
Review/
Inspect
Treatment
C
Review/
Inspect
Distribution
System
D
Report
Document
ation/
File
Review
E
Report
Develop
ment
F
Data Entry
G
Report
Review and
Discussion
w/ PWS
H
Travel
I
Total
Unit Burden
(hours)
J=sum(B-I)
Unit Cost
(Full Survey)
K=A*J
≤100
$
58.86
1.1
0.8
1.2
2.3
5.7
0.8
1.3
1.8
14.9
$
879
101-500
$
58.86
1.2
0.8
1.2
2.3
5.8
0.8
1.3
1.8
15.1
$
887
501-1,000
$
58.86
1.5
1.1
1.7
2.6
7.4
0.8
1.3
1.8
18.1
$
1,063
1,001-3,300
$
58.86
2.2
1.3
2.9
3.4
8.8
1.2
1.4
1.8
22.8
$
1,341
3,301-10K
$
58.86
2.7
1.6
3.6
3.7
9.6
1.3
1.8
1.8
25.9
$
1,525
10,001-50K
$
58.86
3.7
2.0
4.3
5.3
10.1
1.4
1.9
1.8
30.3
$
1,785
50,001-100K
$
58.86
9.0
3.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
2.0
3.0
1.8
54.8
$
3,223
100,000-1M
$
58.86
15.0
8.0
24.0
18.0
18.0
3.0
3.0
1.8
90.8
$
5,342
36.0
18.0
18.0
4.0
4.0
1.8
115.8
$
5,342
>1,000,000
$
58.86
24.0
10.0
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
$
58.86
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.9
5.1
0.8
1.3
1.8
13.6
$
800
101-500
$
58.86
1.0
0.8
1.1
2.0
5.3
0.8
1.3
1.8
14.0
$
825
501-1,000
$
58.86
1.1
0.9
1.3
2.1
6.5
0.8
1.3
1.8
15.7
$
925
1,001-3,300
$
58.86
1.1
1.1
1.2
2.1
6.5
0.8
1.3
1.8
15.9
$
933
3,301-10K
$
58.86
1.5
1.5
1.7
2.2
6.7
0.8
1.5
1.8
17.6
$
1,033
10,001-50K
$
58.86
1.5
1.5
1.8
2.5
6.7
0.8
1.5
1.8
18.0
$
1,060
50,001-100K
$
58.86
8.0
1.5
2.3
2.5
10.0
0.8
1.5
1.8
28.3
$
1,666
100,000-1M
$
58.86
8.0
1.5
10.0
8.0
10.0
1.0
1.5
1.8
41.8
$
2,458
>1,000,000
NA
NA
NA
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.8
NA
NA
≤100
$
58.86
0.7
0.6
0.6
1.5
5.1
0.8
0.9
1.8
11.9
$
699
101-500
$
58.86
0.7
0.6
0.6
1.5
5.3
0.8
0.9
1.8
12.1
$
713
501-1,000
$
58.86
1.0
0.8
1.0
1.8
5.8
0.8
0.9
1.8
13.9
$
816
1,001-3,300
$
58.86
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.8
5.8
0.8
1.1
1.8
14.3
$
839
3,301-10K
$
58.86
1.2
1.3
1.2
1.8
5.8
0.8
1.2
1.8
15.0
$
882
10,001-50K
$
58.86
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.8
5.8
0.8
1.2
1.8
15.1
$
889
50,001-100K
$
58.86
8.0
1.3
1.3
3.0
8.0
0.8
1.2
1.8
25.3
$
1,489
100,000-1M
$
58.86
8.0
1.3
10.0
3.0
8.0
0.8
1.2
1.8
34.1
$
2,004
>1,000,000
Note:
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.8
NA
NA
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
2) Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already comply with
rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).
(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.
G-9
December 2011
Exhibit G.7d State Unit Burden and Cost Estimates for Performing Full and Incremental Sanitary
Surveys (No Treatment)
Labor
Review/
Cost
Inspect
System Size
(per hour)
Wells
(Population
A
B
Served)
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
Review/
Inspect
Distribution
System
C
Report
Document
ation/
File
Review
D
Report
Develop
ment
E
Data Entry
F
Report
Review and
Discussion
w/ PWS
G
Travel
H
Total
Unit Burden
(hours)
I=sum(B-H)
Unit Cost
(Full Survey)
J=A*I
≤100
$
58.86
1.1
1.2
2.3
5.7
0.8
1.3
1.8
14.1
$
831
101-500
$
58.86
1.2
1.2
2.3
5.8
0.8
1.3
1.8
14.3
$
840
501-1,000
$
58.86
1.5
1.7
2.6
7.4
0.8
1.3
1.8
17.0
$
1,000
1,001-3,300
$
58.86
2.2
2.9
3.4
8.8
1.2
1.4
1.8
21.5
$
1,265
3,301-10K
$
58.86
2.7
3.6
3.7
9.6
1.3
1.8
1.8
24.3
$
1,433
10,001-50K
$
58.86
3.7
4.3
5.3
10.1
1.4
1.9
1.8
28.3
$
1,667
50,001-100K
$
58.86
9.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
2.0
3.0
1.8
51.8
$
3,046
100,000-1M
$
58.86
15.0
24.0
18.0
18.0
3.0
3.0
1.8
82.8
$
4,871
18.0
18.0
4.0
4.0
1.8
105.8
$
4,871
>1,000,000
$
58.86
24.0
36.0
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
$
58.86
1.0
1.0
1.9
5.1
0.8
1.3
1.8
12.8
$
756
101-500
$
58.86
1.0
1.1
2.0
5.3
0.8
1.3
1.8
13.3
$
781
501-1,000
$
58.86
1.1
1.3
2.1
6.5
0.8
1.3
1.8
14.9
$
874
1,001-3,300
$
58.86
1.1
1.2
2.1
6.5
0.8
1.3
1.8
14.8
$
868
3,301-10K
$
58.86
1.5
1.7
2.2
6.7
0.8
1.5
1.8
16.1
$
945
10,001-50K
$
58.86
1.5
1.8
2.5
6.7
0.8
1.5
1.8
16.5
$
971
50,001-100K
$
58.86
8.0
2.3
2.5
10.0
0.8
1.5
1.8
26.8
$
1,578
100,000-1M
$
58.86
8.0
10.0
8.0
10.0
1.0
1.5
1.8
40.3
$
2,369
>1,000,000
NA
NA
NA
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
≤100
$
58.86
0.7
0.6
1.5
5.1
0.8
0.9
1.8
11.3
$
664
101-500
$
58.86
0.7
0.6
1.5
5.3
0.8
0.9
1.8
11.5
$
679
501-1,000
$
58.86
1.0
1.0
1.8
5.8
0.8
0.9
1.8
13.0
$
767
1,001-3,300
$
58.86
1.0
1.0
1.8
5.8
0.8
1.1
1.8
13.3
$
780
3,301-10K
$
58.86
1.2
1.2
1.8
5.8
0.8
1.2
1.8
13.7
$
803
10,001-50K
$
58.86
1.2
1.3
1.8
5.8
0.8
1.2
1.8
13.8
$
812
50,001-100K
$
58.86
8.0
1.3
3.0
8.0
0.8
1.2
1.8
24.0
$
1,413
100,000-1M
$
58.86
8.0
10.0
3.0
8.0
0.8
1.2
1.8
32.8
$
>1,000,000
Note:
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
NA
1,928
NA
2) Weighted unit costs equal 5% of the unit costs. This factor accounts for 50% effort for an incremental survey and 10% of systems that do not already
comply with rule requirements (see Chapter 6, Sec. 6.4.2 of the GWR EA for discussion).
(D) Unit costs for NTNCWSs may be over-estimated because some of these systems may not have a distribution system.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 10
December 2011
Exhibit G.8 Estimated Burden and Costs for Performing Triggered Monitoring
Exhibit G.8a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Performing Triggered Monitoring (E. coli sampling)
≤100
Cost Component
Sampling
Sampling labor (hours)
Labor cost1 (per hour)
Total sampling cost
$
$
Laboratory Analysis2
Commercial analysis cost
In-house labor (hours)
Labor cost (per hour)
In-house materials cost 4
Total analysis cost
3
$
$
$
$
101-500
0.5
32.38 $
16.19 $
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
81.73
$
$
$
$
501-1,000
0.5
32.38 $
16.19 $
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
81.73
$
$
$
$
Service Population Category
1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
0.5
32.38 $
16.19 $
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
81.73
$
$
$
$
0.5
32.38 $
16.19 $
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
81.73
$
$
$
$
0.5
32.38 $
16.19 $
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
81.73
$
$
$
$
50,001-100,000
0.5
32.38 $
16.19 $
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
45.11
$
$
$
$
100,001-1,000,000
0.5
32.38 $
16.19 $
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
26.80
$
$
$
$
>1,000,000
0.5
32.38 $
16.19 $
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
26.80
$
$
$
$
0.5
32.38
16.19
100.04
0.5
32.38
10.61
26.80
Reporting
Monitoring report labor (hours)
Labor cost5 (per hour)
Total reporting cost
Total cost
Notes:
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
$
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38
$
80.96 $
80.96 $
80.96 $
80.96 $
80.96 $
80.96 $
80.96 $
80.96 $
80.96
123.95 $
123.95
$ 178.88 $ 178.88 $ 178.88 $
178.88 $
178.88 $
142.26 $
123.95 $
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1. EPA assumes all sampling conducted by system operator.
3) EPA assumes that 25 percent of CWSs serving less than 10,000 individuals, 75 percent of systems serving 10,000 to 50,000 individuals, and all CWSs serving more
than 50,000 conduct in-house analysis; the remaining CWSs contract a commercial laboratory. EPA assumes all NCWSs contract a commercial laboratory. Therefore,
EPA uses the following ratios to determine total cost of analysis:
a) Total cost to system serving <10,000=.75*(Commercial analysis cost)+.25*(In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost)
b) Total cost to system serving 10,001-50,000=.25(Commercial analysis cost)+.75*(In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost)
c) Total cost to system serving >50,000=In-house labor*Labor cost+In-house materials cost
4) Inflated to 2010 dollars from the 2006 estimate used in the GWR Economic Analysis using annual PPI, all commodities, not seasonally adjusted (www.bls.gov/data).
5) Inflated to 2010 dollars from the 2006 estimate used in the GWR Economic Analysis using annual CPI-U, U.S. city average, all items, not seasonally adjusted.
6) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.8b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Triggered Monitoring Report
Service Population Category
Cost Component
Triggered Monitoring Review and
Labor cost2 (per hour)
Total cost
Notes:
≤100
$
3.5
43.79 $
101-500
501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.5
43.79 $
43.79 $
43.79 $
43.79 $
43.79 $
43.79 $
43.79 $
43.79
$ 153.27 $ 153.27 $ 153.27 $
153.27 $
153.27 $
153.27 $
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
153.27
$
153.27
$
153.27
2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 11
December 2011
Exhibit G.9 Estimated Burden & Costs for Corrective Action Plans
Exhibit G.9a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Corrective Action Plans
Service Population Category
≤100
101-500
501-1,000 1,001-3,300 3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000 50,001-100,000 100,001-1,000,000 >1,000,000
Cost Component
Plan Development and
19
29
74
12
13
60
74
58
70
Submission1 (hours)
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$ 32.38 $ 32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38 $
32.38
Unit Plan Cost
$ 388.61 $ 420.99 $
615.30 $
939.14 $
1,878.27 $
1,943.04 $
2,266.88 $
2,396.42 $ 2,396.42
Notes:
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives. Every system performing corrective action
is assumed to develop a corrective action plan.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.9b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Corrective Action Plans
Cost Component
Plan Review and Processing1
(hours)
Labor cost2 (per hour)
Unit Plan Review Cost
Notes:
≤100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
Service Population Category
3,301-10,000 10,001-50,000
12
13
19
29
$ 58.86 $ 58.86 $
58.86 $
58.86 $
$ 706.37 $ 765.23 $ 1,118.42 $ 1,707.06 $
58
58.86 $
3,414.11 $
50,001-100,000
30
58.86 $
1,765.92 $
100,001-1,000,000
35
58.86 $
2,060.24 $
>1,000,000
37
37
58.86 $
58.86
2,177.97 $ 2,177.97
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives. The ratio of state burden to system
burden for this activity is assumed to be 1:1 for systems serving 10,000 or fewer because small systems are assumed to require significant assistance to
complete the plans. Because systems serving more than 10,000 are assumed to have more technical and managerial staff, their plans will require less review,
and the ratio of state burden to system burden for these systems for this activity is assumed to be 0.5:1.
2) Labor rates for field engineer from Exhibit G.1.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 12
December 2011
Exhibit G.10a PWS Compliance Monitoring Costs for Systems Serving
3,300 or Fewer People
Component
Unit
Cost
(2010$)
Labor
burden
(per day)
Annual
Cost
Frequency
Annual
Labor
Burden
Annual
Total
Cost
A
B
C
D=B*C
E=A*B*C
Compliance Monitoring Labor
25-100
$
32.38
0.50
365
183
$
5,910
101-500
$
32.38
0.50
365
183
$
5,910
500-3.3k
$
32.38
0.50
365
183
$
5,910
25-100
$
41.31
N/A
3.65
N/A
$
151
101-500
$
41.31
N/A
3.65
N/A
$
151
500-3.3k
$
41.31
N/A
3.65
N/A
$
151
183 $
6,061
183 $
6,061
183 $
6,061
Chlorine Test Kits
Totals
25-100
101-500
500-3.3k
Notes:
Sources:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
(A) Labor rate from Exhibit G.1. Test kit cost inflated from unit cost for test kit from Products for
Analysis, 1998 Hach Co. Model 2231-02, using PPI (annual, finished goods less food and energy,
www.bls.gov/data)
(B) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water
industry representatives.
(C) Monitoring performed daily. New test kit needed every 100 days.
Exhibit G.10b PWS Compliance Monitoring Costs for Systems Serving More than 3,300
People
Unit
Cost
(2010$)
Quantity
Purchased
(units;
hours)
Total
Cost
D=A*(C/B)
E
F=D*E
Component
Capital Costs
Chlorine analyzer (Hach CL17)
$
2,212
1
$
Power cord
$
9
1
$
2,212
9
Chart recorder (Honeywell 10" round)
$
619
1
$
619
3.3k-10k
$
32.38
8
$
10k-100k
$
32.38
8
$
259
>100k
$
32.38
8
$
259
3.3k-10k
$
3,100
10k-100k
$
3,100
>100k
$
3,100
Installation labor (System Operator)
259
Total Capital Cost
Annual Operation and Maintenance
Compliance monitoring (hours/year)
3.3k-10k
$
32.38
80
$
10k-100k
$
32.38
80
$
2,591
>100k
$
32.38
80
$
2,591
2,591
Maintenance kit
$
170
1
$
170
Monthly reagents
$
22
12
$
263
Charts
$
18
1
$
18
Recorder pens
$
63
1
$
63
3.3k-10k
$
3,105
10k-100k
$
3,105
>100k
$
3,105
Total Annual Operation and Maintenance Costs
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
Systems serving greater than 3,300 people conduct continuous monitoring and are
required to record the lowest disinfection residual measured daily. Burden for this
activity is assumed to be negligible.
Source:
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
(A) Inflated from unit costs for equipment (both capital and O&M) from Products for
Analysis, 1998 Hach Co., using PPI for electrical machinery and equipment (chlorine
analyzer equipment) and for finished goods less food and energy (O&M equipment)
from www.bls.gov/data. Labor rate from Exhibit G.1.
G - 13
December 2011
Exhibit G.11 Estimated Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring
Exhibit G.11a Estimated System Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Initial Notification
Service Population Category
≤100
Cost Component
1
Notification labor (hours)
101-500
0.5
501-1,000
0.5
1,001-3,300
0.5
3,301-10,000
0.5
10,001-50,000
0.5
50,001-100,000
0.5
100,001-1,000,000
0.5
>1,000,000
0.5
0.5
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
Total cost
$
16.19
$
16.19
$
16.19
$
16.19
$
16.19
$
16.19
$
16.19
$
16.19
$
16.19
Notes:
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.11b Estimated State Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Notification Documentation
Service Population Category
≤100
Cost Component
Document notification1
(hours)
101-500
0.5
501-1,000
0.5
1,001-3,300
0.5
3,301-10,000
0.5
10,001-50,000
0.5
50,001-100,000
0.5
100,001-1,000,000
0.5
>1,000,000
0.5
0.5
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
Total cost
$
21.90
$
21.90
$
21.90
$
21.90
$
21.90
$
21.90
$
21.90
$
21.90
$
21.90
Notes:
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.11c Estimated System Burden and Costs for Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection Failure)
Service Population Category
≤100
Cost Component
1
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10,000
10,001-50,000
50,001-100,000
100,001-1,000,000
>1,000,000
Report labor (hours)
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
$
32.38
Total cost
$
80.96
$
80.96
$
80.96
$
80.96
$
80.96
$
80.96
$
80.96
$
80.96
$
80.96
Notes:
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
2) Labor rates from Exhibit G.1.
Exhibit G.11d Estimated State Burden and Costs for Reviewing Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)
Service Population Category
≤100
Cost Component
Review report1 (hours)
101-500
3.5
Labor cost2 (per hour)
$
43.79
Total cost
$
153.27
Notes:
501-1,000
3.5
$
1,001-3,300
3.5
3,301-10,000
3.5
10,001-50,000
3.5
50,001-100,000
3.5
100,001-1,000,000
3.5
>1,000,000
3.5
3.5
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$
43.79
$ 153.27
$
153.27
$
153.27
$
153.27
$
153.27
$
153.27
$
153.27
$
153.27
1) Burden estimates take into account the results of December 2011 consultations with water industry representatives.
2) Labor rate for state employee from Exhibit G.1.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 14
December 2011
Exhibit G.12
Respondents for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up
46,566
46,566
46,566
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sanitary Survey Start-Up
46,566
46,566
46,566
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
Triggered Monitoring (EPs)
-
-
-
6,062
6,062
6,062
6,062
6,062
6,062
6,062
Triggered Monitoring Reporting
-
-
-
723
723
723
723
723
723
723
Corrective Action Plans (systems) - from significant
deficiencies and TM
-
-
-
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification (systems)
-
-
-
19,083
Compliance Monitoring (EPs) [1]
-
-
-
471
943
1,414
1,885
2,356
2,828
3,299
Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection Failure
Reports) (EPs)
-
-
-
1,469
1,493
1,517
1,540
1,564
1,587
1,611
46,566
46,566
46,566
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
PWSs with one/more Respondent Activities
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
-
-
-
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
-
-
Start-Up Activities
Start-Up
57
57
57
-
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Triggered Monitoring - Review Report
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Correction Action - Review Plans
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Compliance Monitoring Report Review (Disinfection
Failure)
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Annual Administration
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Year 1
46,566
57
Year 2
46,566
57
Year 3
46,566
57
Year 4
29,678
57
Year 5
29,678
57
Year 6
29,678
57
Year 7
29,678
57
Year 8
29,678
57
Year 9
29,678
57
Year 10
29,678
57
46,623
46,623
46,623
29,735
29,735
29,735
29,735
29,735
29,735
29,735
Notes:
[1] Compliance monitoring must be conducted for all entry points that disinfect to 4-log. Once compliance monitoring is begun for an entry point, it must be continued. This calculation assumes that the initiation
of this activity is evenly distributed across Years 4 to 25 post-implementation.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 15
December 2011
Exhibit G.13
Responses for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up
46,566
46,566
46,566
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sanitary Survey Start-Up
46,566
46,566
46,566
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Activities
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
Triggered Monitoring (samples)
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
89,890
89,890
89,890
89,890
89,890
89,890
89,890
Triggered Monitoring Reporting
-
-
-
723
723
723
723
723
723
723
Corrective Action Plans - from significant
deficiencies and TM
-
-
-
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification
-
-
-
28,918
-
-
-
-
-
-
Compliance Monitoring (samples)
-
-
-
172,012
Compliance Monitoring Reporting (Disinfection
Failure)
Yearly Total
-
-
-
-
-
93,132
93,132
93,132
344,025
516,037
688,049
860,061
1,032,074
1,204,086
1,469
1,493
1,517
1,540
1,564
1,587
1,611
324,394
467,512
639,548
811,584
983,619
1,155,655
1,327,691
Year 9
Year 10
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Start-Up Activities
Start-Up
57
57
57
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
29,678
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
Triggered Monitoring - Review Report
-
-
-
723
723
723
723
723
723
723
Corrective Action - Review Plans
-
-
-
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
1,704
Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation
-
-
-
28,918
-
-
-
-
-
-
Compliance Monitoring Report Review (Disinfection
Failure)
-
-
-
1,469
1,493
1,517
1,540
1,564
1,587
1,611
Annual Administration
-
-
-
57
57
57
57
57
57
57
Yearly Total
57
57
57
62,549
33,655
33,678
33,702
33,725
33,749
33,773
Year 1
93,132
57
Year 2
93,132
57
Year 3
93,132
57
Year 4
324,394
62,549
Year 5
467,512
33,655
Year 6
639,548
33,678
Year 7
811,584
33,702
Year 8
983,619
33,725
Year 9
1,155,655
33,749
Year 10
1,327,691
33,773
93,189
93,189
93,189
386,943
501,167
673,226
845,285
1,017,345
1,189,404
1,361,464
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Yearly Total
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 16
December 2011
Exhibit G.14
Burden for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up
Sanitary Survey Start-Up
1,237,163
1,237,163
1,237,163
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
139,698
139,698
139,698
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
105,062
105,062
105,062
105,062
105,062
105,062
105,062
Triggered Monitoring
-
-
-
57,655
57,655
57,655
57,655
57,655
57,655
57,655
Triggered Monitoring Reporting
-
-
-
1,807
1,807
1,807
1,807
1,807
1,807
1,807
Corrective Action Plans
-
-
-
26,169
26,169
26,169
26,169
26,169
26,169
26,169
Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification
-
-
-
9,542
-
-
-
-
-
-
Compliance Monitoring [1]
-
-
-
86,006
172,012
258,018
344,025
430,031
516,037
602,043
Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)
-
-
-
3,674
3,733
3,791
3,850
3,909
3,968
4,027
289,915
366,439
452,504
538,569
624,634
710,699
796,764
Yearly Total
1,376,861
1,376,861
1,376,861
States
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Start-Up
125,020
125,020
125,020
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
-
-
-
411,716
411,716
411,716
411,716
411,716
411,716
411,716
Triggered Monitoring - Review Report
-
-
-
2,530
2,530
2,530
2,530
2,530
2,530
2,530
Correction Action - Review Plans
-
-
-
25,340
25,340
25,340
25,340
25,340
25,340
25,340
Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation
-
-
-
14,459
Compliance Monitoring Report Review (Disinfection
Failure)
-
-
-
5,143
5,226
5,308
5,390
5,473
5,555
5,638
Annual Administration
-
-
-
293,208
293,208
293,208
293,208
293,208
293,208
293,208
752,396
738,019
738,102
738,184
738,267
738,349
738,432
Yearly Total
125,020
125,020
125,020
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
Year 1
1,376,861
125,020
Year 2
1,376,861
125,020
Year 3
1,376,861
125,020
Year 4
289,915
752,396
Year 5
366,439
738,019
Year 6
452,504
738,102
Year 7
538,569
738,184
Year 8
624,634
738,267
Year 9
710,699
738,349
Year 10
796,764
738,432
Yearly Total 1,501,881 1,501,881
1,501,881
1,042,311
1,104,458
1,190,605
1,276,753
1,362,900
1,449,048
1,535,195
Notes:
[1] Compliance monitoring burden applies only to systems serving ≤3,300 people, because systems larger than 3,300 people incur no significant labor burden for this activity. Systems larger than 3,300 monitor disinfectant
residuals continuously, and thus are required to report only the lowest reading each day.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 17
December 2011
Exhibit G.15
Costs for Full Implementation of the Rule Year by Year by Activity
PWSs
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Microbial & Compliance Monitor Start-Up
Sanitary Survey Start-Up
$40,064,300
$40,064,300
$40,064,300 $
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$4,523,976
$4,523,976
$4,523,976 $
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
3,401,553
$
3,401,553
$
3,401,553
$
3,401,553
$
3,401,553
$
3,401,553
$
3,401,553
Triggered Monitoring (Sampling and Analysis Labor)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,867,115
$
1,867,115
$
1,867,115
$
1,867,115
$
1,867,115
$
1,867,115
$
1,867,115
Triggered Monitoring Reporting
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
58,512
$
58,512
$
58,512
$
58,512
$
58,512
$
58,512
$
58,512
Triggered Monitoring O&M
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
5,625,152
$
5,625,152
$
5,625,152
$
5,625,152
$
5,625,152
$
5,625,152
$
5,625,152
Corrective Action Plans
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
847,460
$
847,460
$
847,460
$
847,460
$
847,460
$
847,460
$
847,460
Compliance Monitoring - Initial Notification
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
308,992
$
Compliance Monitoring
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
2,785,222
$
Compliance Monitoring Report (Disinfection Failure)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
118,966
$
120,874
$
122,781
$
124,689
$
126,597
$
128,504
$
130,412
Compliance Monitoring (Capital + O&M) [1]
$
Capital Cost $
Annual O&M $
-
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
-
$
$
$
188,474
88,231
100,242
$
$
$
288,716
88,231
200,485
$
$
$
388,959
88,231
300,727
$
$
$
489,201
88,231
400,969
$
$
$
589,443
88,231
501,212
$
$
$
689,686
88,231
601,454
$
$
$
789,928
88,231
701,697
$
15,201,447
$
17,779,828
$
20,667,200
$
23,554,572
$
26,441,945
$
29,329,317
$
32,216,690
Yearly Total $
44,588,275
$ 44,588,275
$ 44,588,275
Year 2
Year 3
$5,474,876
$5,474,876 $
-
$
5,570,445
$
-
$
8,355,667
$
-
$
11,140,890
$
-
$
13,926,112
$
-
$
16,711,335
$
19,496,557
States
Year 1
Year 4
Year 5
Year 6
Year 7
Year 8
Year 9
Year 10
Start-Up Activities
Start-Up
$5,474,876
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Annual Activities
Sanitary Survey
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
24,233,777
$
24,233,777
$
24,233,777
$
24,233,777
$
24,233,777
$
24,233,777
$
24,233,777
Triggered Monitoring - Review Report
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
110,775
$
110,775
$
110,775
$
110,775
$
110,775
$
110,775
$
110,775
Corrective Action - Review Plans
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
1,491,620
$
1,491,620
$
1,491,620
$
1,491,620
$
1,491,620
$
1,491,620
$
1,491,620
Compliance Monitoring - Notification Documentation
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
633,179
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Compliance Monitoring Report Review (Disinfection
Failure)
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
225,224
$
228,836
$
232,448
$
236,059
$
239,671
$
243,282
$
246,894
Annual Administration
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
12,840,165
$
12,840,165
$
12,840,165
$
12,840,165
$
12,840,165
$
12,840,165
$
12,840,165
Yearly Total
$5,474,876
$5,474,876
$5,474,876
$39,534,740
$38,905,172
$38,908,783
$38,912,395
$38,916,007
$38,919,618
$38,923,230
Sum for PWSs and States
PWSs
States and Territories
$
$
Year 1
44,588,275
5,474,876
Year 2
$ 44,588,275
$
5,474,876
Year 3
$ 44,588,275
$ 5,474,876
$
$
Year 4
15,201,447
39,534,740
$
$
Year 5
17,779,828
38,905,172
$
$
Year 6
20,667,200
38,908,783
$
$
Year 7
23,554,572
38,912,395
$
$
Year 8
26,441,945
38,916,007
$
$
Year 9
29,329,317
38,919,618
Yearly Total $
50,063,151 $ 50,063,151 $ 50,063,151 $
54,736,187 $ 56,684,999 $ 59,575,983 $ 62,466,968 $ 65,357,952 $ 68,248,936
Notes:
[1] Capital costs are incurred only by systems serving more than 3,300 people, because these systems must purchase equipment to conduct continuous monitoring. O&M costs are incurred by systems of all sizes.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 18
$
$
Year 10
32,216,690
38,923,230
$
71,139,920
December 2011
Exhibit G.16
Average Annual Burden per Response and per Respondent and Average
Annual Responses per Respondent
Burden
Capital
Total Annual
Responses Hours
Labor Costs O&M Costs Costs
Costs
PWSs
897,601
581,601 18,833,784 6,076,243
88,231 24,998,259
States and Territories
33,714
738,226 38,914,201
0
0 38,914,201
Total
931,315 1,319,827 57,747,985 6,076,243
88,231 63,912,460
Note: Annual average burden and costs represent burden and costs for May 1, 2012 - April 31, 2015.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 19
December 2011
Exhibit G.17a - Number of Systems and Entry Points Subject to GWR Requirements
System Size
(Population
Served)
Systems
Performing
Implementation
Activities
A
Systems
Disinfecting
B
Systems
Disinfecting;
4 log
C
Systems
Receiving a
Sanitary
Survey
D=A
Systems
Subject
to
HSAs
E=0
Systems
Performing
Triggered
Monitoring
F=A-C
Systems
Performing
Assessment
Monitoring
G
Systems
Performing
Corrective
Action
H
Systems
Performing
Compliance
Monitoring
I
Entry
Points
Performing
HSAs
J
Entry Points
Performing
Triggered
Monitoring
K
Entry Points
Performing
Assessment
Monitoring
Entry Points
Performing
Compliance
Monitoring
L
M
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
≤100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
11,683
13,737
4,463
5,964
3,108
1,661
192
104
5
6,117
9,306
3,559
5,013
2,736
1,531
177
104
5
3,181
4,839
1,851
2,607
1,423
796
92
54
5
11,683
13,737
4,463
5,964
3,108
1,661
192
104
5
-
8,502
8,898
2,612
3,358
1,686
866
100
50
-
-
Totals
40,918
28,548
14,847
40,918
-
26,070
-
899
848
270
162
26
3
2,208
8,571
6,467
1,660
763
103
12
17,576
-
7,672
5,619
1,390
601
77
9
15,368
-
2,080
1,608
413
221
32
4
0
0
0
4,358
-
16,458
5,362
544
170
22
2
1
0
0
22,559
37,498
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
8,571
2,901
101-500
6,467
2,735
501-1,000
1,660
872
1,001-3,300
763
524
3,301-10K
103
83
10,001-50K
12
9
50,001-100K
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
17,576
7,123
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
≤100
59,238
13,793
1,379
59,238
57,859
101-500
19,358
5,504
550
19,358
18,808
501-1,000
1,965
700
70
1,965
1,895
1,001-3,300
568
247
25
568
543
3,301-10K
66
28
3
66
63
10,001-50K
6
2
0
6
6
50,001-100K
3
3
3
100,001-1 Million
> 1 Million
Totals
81,204
20,274
2,027
81,204
79,177
Grand Total
139,698
55,945
19,083
139,698
120,615
Notes:
Detail may not add to totals due to independent rounding.
Sources:
(A) Ground water system inventories for CWSs, NTNCWSs, and TNCWSs: SDWIS/FED Data from October 2010.
(B) Systems performing implementation activities multiplied by percent of systems disinfecting.
(C) Systems disinfecting to 4-log based on percentages from AWWA (1998).
(D) Based on rule requirements, all systems are subject to sanitary surveys.
3,026
3,613
1,127
1,398
834
495
60
29
0
10,581
4,223
6,114
2,220
2,994
1,726
1,009
120
65
5
-
9,276
10,857
4,132
6,230
3,697
3,059
941
627
-
-
4,607
7,460
3,512
5,556
3,785
3,566
1,126
817
63
-
38,820
-
30,493
1,409
979
362
177
28
3
0
0
0
2,957
-
7,672
5,619
1,390
601
77
9
15,368
-
1,409
979
362
177
28
3
2,957
1,590
624
80
26
3
0
0
0
0
2,323
23,756
-
57,859
18,808
1,895
543
63
6
3
79,177
133,364
-
1,590
624
80
26
3
0
2,323
35,773
18,475
(E), (J) Based on rule requirements, systems not required to perform HSAs
(F) Based on rule requirements, systems that do not achieve 4-log disinfection are subject to triggered source water monitoring.
(G) Based on rule requirements, assessment monitoring is not required.
(H) Based on rule requirements, systems found to have significant deficiencies during a sanitary survey, or those that detect source water contamination, must undergo corrective action. Number of systems undergoing
corrective action from model output.
(I) Systems treating to 4-log inactivation or removal of viruses must undergo compliance monitoring. Number of systems subject to compliance monitoring is converted from entry points subject to compliance monitoring
(column M), using entry points/system.
(K) Number of entry points subject to triggered monitoring is equal to number of systems subject to HSAs (column J).
(L) Based on rule requirements, assessment monitoring is not required.
(M) (Exhibit G.17b, Columns E+F) + (Exhibit G.4, Column C)
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 20
December 2011
Exhibit G.17b - Summary of Rule Implications
System Size
Systems with
Corrective
Actions for
Systems
Significant
Receiving
Sanitary Survey Deficiencies
A
Entry Points
with
Corrective
Actions for Entry Points with Viral
Previously NonDisinfection Increased from disinfecting Entry Points
Triggered
Monitoring less than 4 logs to 4 logs
Taking Corrective Action
Entry Points with
Triggered
Monitoring
B
C
D
E
Entry Points with
Incremental
Compliance Monitoring
F
G
Community Water Systems (CWSs)
≤100
11,683
1,984
11,641
1,137
326
811
225
101-500
13,737
2,338
14,178
1,555
877
678
279
501-1,000
4,463
758
5,354
584
346
238
101
1,001-3,300
5,964
1,010
8,992
719
399
320
131
3,301-10K
3,108
530
6,076
665
381
284
119
10,001-50K
1,661
282
5,013
754
630
123
62
50,001-100K
192
33
1,488
260
107
153
53
100,001-1 Million
104
18
757
137
95
43
-
-
-
-
-
-
> 1 Million
5
21
Nontransient Noncommunity Water Systems (NTNCWSs)
≤100
8,571
1,458
7,803
623
136
487
135
101-500
6,467
1,098
5,884
510
114
397
163
501-1,000
1,660
282
1,511
131
29
102
43
1,001-3,300
763
129
694
91
20
71
29
3,301-10K
103
18
94
14
3
11
5
10,001-50K
12
2
11
2
0
1
50,001-100K
-
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
100,001-1 Million
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
> 1 Million
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Transient Noncommunity Water Systems (TNCWSs)
≤100
59,238
10,102
58,178
6,356
1,051
5,305
1,473
101-500
19,358
3,297
19,006
2,065
344
1,722
710
1,965
334
1,930
211
35
176
74
568
96
558
73
12
61
25
3,301-10K
66
11
65
10
2
9
4
10,001-50K
6
1
6
1
0
1
0
50,001-100K
3
1
3
1
0
0
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
0
100,001-1 Million
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
> 1 Million
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Sources:
(A) Ground water system inventories for CWSs, NTNCWSs, and TNCWSs: SDWIS/FED Data, October 2010.
(B) - (G): Baseline information from the cost model for the Ground Water Rule was updated by multiplying the percentage of systems or entry points performing each rule component by column A.
Notes:
(G) Indicates number of entry points with treatment corrective actions.
(F) - (G) Indicates non-treatment corrective actions.
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 21
December 2011
Exhibit G.18
Ground Water Rule - Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
2008 Burden
PWSs - Treated
CWSs
4.3 hrs
4.3 hrs
5.4 hrs
NTNCWSs
4.5 hrs
5.0 hrs
5.8 hrs
20.5 hrs
TNCWSs
3.9 hrs
3.3 hrs
3.8 hrs
20.0 hrs
Task
System Size
Revised Burden
Sanitary Survey
Sanitary Survey
Sanitary Survey
<100
101-500
501-1,000
4.4 hrs
4.5 hrs
5.6 hrs
Sanitary Survey
Sanitary Survey
Sanitary Survey
Sanitary Survey
501-1,000
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
4.6 hrs
6.3 hrs
13.3 hrs
21.0 hrs
Sanitary Survey
Sanitary Survey
Sanitary Survey
Sanitary Survey
1,001-3,300
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
4.1 hrs
5.0 hrs
11.8 hrs
20.5 hrs
<100
101-500
501-1,000
3.6 hrs
3.7 hrs
4.5 hrs
501-1,000
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
3.7 hrs
4.8 hrs
11.8 hrs
1,001-3,300
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
3.1 hrs
3.7 hrs
10.5 hrs
19.2 hrs
PWSs - Untreated
CWSs
3.5 hrs
Sanitary Survey
3.5 hrs
Sanitary Survey
4.4 hrs
Sanitary Survey
NTNCWSs
3.6 hrs
Sanitary Survey
4.3 hrs
Sanitary Survey
5.0 hrs
Sanitary Survey
TNCWSs
2.9 hrs
Sanitary Survey
2.8 hrs
Sanitary Survey
3.3 hrs
Sanitary Survey
19.0 hrs
Sanitary Survey
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
G - 22
December 2011
Exhibit G.18 cont.
Ground Water Rule Summary of Original and Revised Burden Estimates
2008 Burden
Task
States - Treated Systems
CWSs
14.8 hrs
Sanitary Survey
14.9 hrs
Sanitary Survey
18.0 hrs
Sanitary Survey
NTNCWSs
13.8 hrs
Sanitary Survey
14.2 hrs
Sanitary Survey
15.6 hrs
Sanitary Survey
15.6 hrs
Sanitary Survey
15.0 hrs
Sanitary Survey
15.8 hrs
Sanitary Survey
41.3 hrs
Sanitary Survey
TNCWSs
12.9 hrs
Sanitary Survey
14.1 hrs
Sanitary Survey
10.8 hrs
Sanitary Survey
11.3 hrs
Sanitary Survey
33.3 hrs
Sanitary Survey
States - Untreated Systems
CWSs
13.9 hrs
Sanitary Survey
14.1 hrs
Sanitary Survey
16.9 hrs
Sanitary Survey
NTNCWSs
13.0 hrs
Sanitary Survey
13.5 hrs
Sanitary Survey
14.8 hrs
Sanitary Survey
14.5 hrs
Sanitary Survey
14.3 hrs
Sanitary Survey
15.0 hrs
Sanitary Survey
TNCWSs
11.9 hrs
Sanitary Survey
12.8 hrs
Sanitary Survey
10.3 hrs
Sanitary Survey
10.8 hrs
Sanitary Survey
32.3 hrs
Sanitary Survey
Microbial Rules ICR - GWR
System Size
Revised Burden
<100
101-500
501-1,000
14.9 hrs
15.1 hrs
18.1 hrs
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
13.6 hrs
14.0 hrs
15.7 hrs
15.9 hrs
18.0 hrs
28.3 hrs
41.8 hrs
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
14.3 hrs
15.0 hrs
15.1 hrs
25.3 hrs
34.1 hrs
<100
101-500
501-1,000
14.1 hrs
14.3 hrs
17.0 hrs
<100
101-500
501-1,000
1,001-3,300
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
12.8 hrs
13.3 hrs
14.9 hrs
14.9 hrs
16.5 hrs
26.8 hrs
1,001-3,300
3,301-10K
10,001-50K
50,001-100K
100,001-1M
13.3 hrs
13.7 hrs
13.8 hrs
24.0 hrs
32.8 hrs
G - 23
December 2011
Appendix H
Aircraft Drinking Water Rule Spreadsheets
Exhibit H.1 - Aircraft and Air Carrier Baseline
# of Available Sampling
Points
# of Aircraft
Total # of Available
Sampling Points
# of Onboard Staff/year
# of Passengers/year
A
B
C=B*A
D
E
Total # of Potentially
Affected Persons/year
# of Air Carriers
F=D+E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
>9
290
1,584
576
321
728
663
227
616
575
290
3,169
1,728
1,283
3,641
3,981
1,589
4,930
7,125
1,507,391
6,581,069
1,776,407
1,912,510
5,058,927
2,955,080
1,077,787
2,868,163
3,045,331
19,028,095
79,544,742
17,469,862
39,491,976
120,968,400
69,589,691
26,080,621
71,332,691
96,109,107
20,535,486
86,125,811
19,246,269
41,404,486
126,027,328
72,544,771
27,158,408
74,200,854
99,154,438
Total
5,581
27,734
26,782,665
539,615,186
566,397,851
G
47
Notes:
(A) Each qualifying lavatory and galley on an aircraft is assumed to have only one sampling point. Therefore, the number of available sampling points is representative
of the number of lavatories and galleys on an aircraft.
(B), (D), (E) Updated using new information on totals for each group multiplied by the previous ratio of aircraft or people in each category to the total number of aircraft or people.
(C) Average number of sampling points used for > 9 sampling points size category.
(D), (E), (F) These numbers are not used to develop cost and burden estimates, but are shown here for informational purposes.
(G) Aircraft Reporting and Compliance System (ARCS) (2011)
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-1
December 2011
Exhibit H.2 - Labor Rates by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) Code - 2010$
H.2a - Unloaded Labor Rates
SOC Code
Occupation
Mean Hourly Wage
Managerial
SOC 11-3071
Clerical
SOC 43-6014
Technical
SOC 39-6031
SOC 53-7061
SOC 53-6051
Transportation, Storage, and Distribution
Managers
$41.65
Secretaries, Except Legal, Medical, and
Executive
$15.83
1
$25.84
Flight Attendants
Cleaners of Vehicles and Equipment
$10.71
Transportation Inspectors
$30.31
Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and
SOC 51-9061
Weighers
$17.09
SOC 53-6099
Transportation Workers
$17.31
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Employment Statistics Survey, May 2010, http://www.bls.gov/data/.
1
Flight Attendants - Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2005. Flight attendants' wage data for 2010 not available.
Index Value
CPI Index Multiplier
(2006 to 2010)
CPI Index Multiplier
(2008Q3 to 2010Q2)
1.08
1.01
Source: CPI-U. U.S. City Average, by expenditure category and commodity and service group,
All Items, Not Seasonally Adjusted, Annual (1982-1984=100).
Load factor
1.5
Source: BLS Employer Costs for Employee Compensation report, Table 9, June 2010. All
workers in private industry. Production, transportation, and material moving. Transportation and
material moving subsector. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_09082010.pdf
SOC Code
H.2b - Loaded Labor Rates
Occupation
Mean Hourly Wage
Managerial
SOC 11-3071
Technical
SOC 53-7061
SOC 53-6051
Transportation, Storage, and Distribution
Managers
$62.00
Cleaners of Vehicles and Equipment
Transportation Inspectors
Inspectors, Testers, Sorters, Samplers, and
SOC 51-9061
Weighers
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational Employment Statistics Survey, May 2010, http://www.bls.gov/data/.
$15.94
$45.12
$25.44
Load factor
1.6
g
q
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Revised November 2005. U.S. EPA Office of Environmental
Information, Collection Strategies Division. p. A-35.
Load factor used for Federal Employees.
Loaded Labor Rates for Regional EPA Employee, January 2010
GS Level
Mean Hourly Wage (Unloaded)
GS 11 - Step 5
$27.40
Note:
Source: U.S. Office of Personnel Management (http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/html/gs.asp).
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
Mean Hourly Wage (Loaded)
$43.84
H-2
December 2011
Exhibit H.3 - Lab Costs (2010$)
Item
TC Coliform Sample
Disinfectant Residual Sampling Kit
Shipping
Annual Equipment Replacement
One-time Equipment Purchase (3 refrigerators)
Cost
$22.30
$3.00
$108.16
$221.80
$604.63
Notes:
1) Estimated chlorine residual sampling kit costs from www.hach.com ($74 for 25 tests).
2) Assume shipping and annual equipment replacement costs are incurred by coliform monitoring. Disinfectant residual samples will be analyzed
immediately and will not require shipping or refrigeration.
3) Assume 3 coolers ($33/cooler), 9 gel packs ($4/gel pack), and 2 calibrated thermometers ($42/thermometer) purchased per air carrier. Cost of
cooler and gel pack from www.coleman.com. Cost of thermometer from https://www1.fishersci.com.
4) Assume 3 refrigerators ($199/refrigerator) purchased per air carrier twice in the 25-year evaluation period. Cost of refrigerator from
www.homedepot.com.
5) Sample analysis costs based on average costs from various EPA certified labs across the U.S.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-3
December 2011
Exhibit H.4a - Airline Burden for the ICR Approval Period
Activity
Air Carrier Implementation
Air Carrier Sampling Plan
Monitoring TC - Air Carriers
O&M Plan- Air Carriers
Routine Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers
Corrective Action Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers
Self-Inspection Reporting and Recordkeeping Air Carriers
Public Notification - Air Carriers
Total
Year 1
30,012
3,907
236
226
707
35,087
Year 2
30,012
3,907
236
226
707
35,087
Year 3
30,012
3,907
236
226
707
35,087
Annual Average
30,012
3,907
236
226
707
35,087
Total Burden for ICR
Approval Period
90,037
11,720
707
677
2,122
105,262
Exhibit H.4b - Agency Burden for the ICR Approval Period
Activity
Agency Implementation
Agency Annual Administration
Agency Sampling Plan Information Review
Monitoring - TC Agency Oversight
O&M Plan Completion- Agency Review
Compliance Audit- Agency
Total
Year 1
5,160
687
150
5,997
Year 2
5,160
687
150
5,997
Year 3
5,160
687
150
5,997
Annual Average
5,160
687
150
5,997
Total Burden for ICR
Approval Period
15,480
2,060
451
17,991
Notes:
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden and
cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.
(2) Implementation activities are assumed to have been completed in the prior ICR period.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-4
December 2011
Exhibit H.5a - Airline Costs for the ICR Approval Period
Activity
Air Carrier Implementation
Air Carrier Sampling Plan
Monitoring TC - Air Carriers - Labor
Monitoring TC - Air Carriers - O&M
Monitoring TC - Air Carriers - Capital
O&M Plan- Air Carriers
Routine Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers
Corrective Action Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers
Self-Inspection Reporting and Recordkeeping Air Carriers
Public Notification - Air Carriers
Total
Year 1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
763,483
3,049,013
3,158
99,383
5,993
10,179
43,844
3,975,051
Year 2
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
763,483
3,049,013
3,158
99,383
5,993
10,179
43,844
3,975,051
Year 3
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
763,483
3,049,013
3,158
99,383
5,993
10,179
43,844
3,975,051
Annual Average
$
$
$
763,483
$
3,049,013
$
3,158
$
$
99,383
$
5,993
$
10,179
$
43,844
$
3,975,051
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total Cost for ICR
Approval Period
2,290,448
9,147,039
9,473
298,148
17,978
30,536
131,531
11,925,152
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total Cost for ICR
Approval Period
678,631
88,745
19,780
Exhibit H.5b - Agency Costs for the ICR Approval Period
Activity
Agency Implementation
Agency Annual Administration
Agency Sampling Plan Information Review
Monitoring - TC Agency Oversight
O&M Plan Completion- Agency Review
Compliance Audit- Agency
Total
Year 1
$
$
$
$
$
$
226,210
29,582
6,593
262,385
Year 2
$
$
$
$
$
$
226,210
29,582
6,593
262,385
Year 3
$
$
$
$
$
$
226,210
29,582
6,593
Annual Average
$
$
226,210
$
$
29,582
$
$
6,593
262,385
262,385
787,156
Notes:
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs incurred to implement the ADWR are not included in the total burden for the Microbial Rules ICR but are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR (the
PWSS ICR addresses all EPA burden for implementation and oversight of the drinking water program). Agency burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.
(2) Implementation activities are assumed to have been completed in the prior ICR period.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-5
December 2011
Exhibit H.6a - Airline Respondents for the ICR Approval Period
Activity
Air Carrier Implementation
Air Carrier Sampling Plan
Monitoring TC - Air Carriers
O&M Plan- Air Carriers
Routine Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers
1
Corrective Action Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers
Self-Inspection Reporting and Recordkeeping Air Carriers
Public Notification - Air Carriers
Total
Year 1
Year 2
47
47
47
9
47
47
47
47
47
9
47
47
Annual Average
47
47
47
9
47
47
Total Respondents for
ICR Approval Period
47
47
47
9
47
47
10
10
2
10
Annual Average
10
10
2
10
Total Respondents for
ICR Approval Period
10
10
2
10
Year 3
47
47
47
9
47
47
Exhibit H.6b - Agency Respondents for the ICR Approval Period2
Activity
Agency Implementation
Agency Annual Administration
Agency Sampling Plan Information Review
Monitoring - TC Agency Oversight
O&M Plan Completion- Agency Review
Compliance Audit- Agency
Total
Year 1
Year 2
10
10
2
10
Year 3
10
10
2
10
Notes:
Implementation activities are assumed to have been completed in the prior ICR period.
1
EPA estimates that all air carriers subject to ADWR (47 air carriers) will perform corrective actions at least once per year.
This rule is administered by the ten EPA regions, thus there are ten Agency respondents for each active rule component.
2
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-6
December 2011
Exhibit H.7a - Airline Responses for the ICR Approval Period
Activity
Air Carrier Implementation
Air Carrier Sampling Plan
Monitoring TC - Air Carriers
O&M Plan- Air Carriers
Routine Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers
1
Corrective Action Disinfection & Flushing Recordkeeping - Air Carriers
Self-Inspection Reporting and Recordkeeping Air Carriers
Public Notification - Air Carriers
Total
Year 1
Year 2
120,371
15,627
16
9
202
136,225
Year 3
120,371
15,627
16
9
202
136,225
120,371
15,627
16
9
202
136,225
Annual Average
120,371
15,627
16
9
202
136,225
Total Responses for
ICR Approval Period
361,112
46,880
47
28
606
408,674
Exhibit H.7b - Agency Responses for the ICR Approval Period2
Activity
Agency Implementation
Agency Annual Administration
Agency Sampling Plan Information Review
Monitoring - TC Agency Oversight
O&M Plan Completion- Agency Review
Compliance Audit- Agency
Total
Year 1
Year 2
-
Year 3
-
-
20
20
20
1,373
9
1,402
1,373
9
1,402
1,373
9
1,402
Annual Average
20
1,373
9
1,402
Total Responses for
ICR Approval Period
60
4,119
28
4,207
Note:
Implementation activities are assumed to have been completed in the prior ICR period.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-7
December 2011
Exhibit H.8a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation (2010$)
Compliance Activity
Labor Cost
($/hour)
A
$45.12
$45.12
One-time labor burden
(hours/air carrier)
B
Unit Cost
C=A*B
$
361
$
361
$
722
Total Labor Burden
(hours)
D=B*# Air Carriers
376
376
752
Total Cost ($)
E=C*# Air Carriers
$
16,964
$
16,964
$
33,928
Read and Understand Rule
8
Train Personnel
8
Total
16
Notes:
(1) Detail may not add due to rounding.
(2) These activities completed prior to this ICR period.
Sources:
(A) Air carrier labor costs from Exhibit H.2. EPA used the transportation inspector category because it was the highest-paid technical labor category. Transportation
inspectors are assumed to have a technical background, as well as some management or oversight responsibility.
(B) Labor hours for start-up activities are carried forward from the stand-alone ADWR ICR.
(D), (E) National totals for U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR to perform implementation activities. Assumes all air carriers spend equal time performing implementation
activities, regardless of fleet size or aircraft type.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-8
December 2011
Exhibit H.8b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Implementation (2010$)
Compliance Activity
Read and Understand Rule
Program Development
Modify/Develop Data Management Systems
Air Carrier Training and Technical Assistance
Staff Training
Total
Notes:
Labor Cost
($/hour)
A
$43.84
$43.84
$43.84
$43.84
$43.84
One-time labor burden
(hours/Region)
B
8
40
115
80
40
283
$
$
$
$
$
$
Unit Cost
C=A*B
351
1,754
5,042
3,507
1,754
12,407
Total Labor
Burden (hours)
D=B*10
80
400
1,150
800
400
2,830
Total Cost ($)
E=C*10
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,507
17,536
50,415
35,071
17,536
124,065
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions.
Agency burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.
(2) Detail may not add due to rounding.
(3) These activities completed prior to this ICR period.
Sources:
(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.
(B) Labor hours for start-up activities carried forward from stand-alone ADWR ICR.
(D), (E) National totals for Agency (EPA Regions) to implement ADWR for U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR. Assumes each region spends equal time performing
implementation activities, regardless of number of air carriers headquartered in their region, air carrier fleet size or aircraft type.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-9
December 2011
Exhibit H.8c - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Annual Administrative Activities (2010$)
Labor Cost
($/hour)
Compliance Activity
Lab Certification
Ongoing Technical Assistance
Staff Training
Total
Notes:
Labor
(hours/Region/year)
Cost ($/year)
Total Labor
Burden
(hours/year)
B
C=A*B
D=B*10
A
$43.84
$43.84
$43.84
500
16
516
$
$
$
$
21,920
701
22,621
5,000
160
5,160
Total Cost ($/year)
E=C*10
$
$
$
$
219,196
7,014
226,210
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions.
Agency burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.
(2) Detail may not add due to rounding.
(3) No costs are associated with lab certification under the ADWR because it is not anticipated that the Agency will need to oversee lab certification programs in addition
to what is being done for the Total Coliform Rule.
Sources:
(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.
(D), (E) National totals for Agency (EPA Regions) to implement ADWR for U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR. Assumes each region spends equal time performing
implementation activities, regardless of number of air carriers headquartered in their region, air carrier fleet size or aircraft type.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-10
December 2011
Exhibit H.9a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Sampling Plan (2010$)
Compliance Activity
Labor Cost
($/hour)
A
One-time labor burden
(hours/air carrier)
B
Unit Cost
C=A*B
Total Labor Burden
(hours)
D=B*# Air Carriers
Total Cost ($)
E=C*# Air Carriers
Develop Sampling Plan per ADWR requirements and
Report Sampling Frequency
$45.12
10 $
451
470 $
21,205
Total
10 $
451
470 $
21,205
Notes:
(1) One-time labor burden for sampling plan includes initial submission of air carrier inventory information.
(2) These activities completed prior to this ICR period
Sources:
(A) Air carrier labor costs from Exhibit H.2. EPA used the transportation inspector category because it was the highest-paid technical labor category. Transportation
inspectors are assumed to have a technical background, as well as some management or oversight responsibility.
(B) Labor hours for developing sampling plans and reporting sampling frequency reflect EPA estimate. Assumes both disinfection and flushing frequency and monitoring
frequency will be reported in plan.
(D), (E) Assume all U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR will develop sampling plans. Assumes all air carriers spend equal time developing sampling plans, regardless of fleet
size or aircraft type.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-11
December 2011
Exhibit H.9b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Sampling Plan (2010$)
Compliance Activity
Review Air Carrier Sampling Plan and Frequency
Total
Notes:
Labor Cost
($/hour)
A
$43.84
One-time labor burden
(hours/air carrier)
B
4.5
4.5
Unit Cost
C=A*B
$
197
$
197
Total Labor Burden
(hours)
D=B*# Air Carriers
212
212
Total Cost ($)
E=C*# Air Carriers
$
9,272
$
9,272
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency
burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.
(2) One-time labor burden for sampling plan includes reviewing initial submission of air carrier inventory information.
(3) This activity completed prior to this ICR period.
Sources:
(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.
(D), (E) Assume all U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR will develop sampling plans. Assumes Agency spends equal time reviewing air carrier sampling plans, regardless of fleet
size or aircraft type.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-12
December 2011
Exhibit H.10a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Coliform Monitoring (2010$)
TC Samples
# of Available
Sampling Points
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
>9
Total
Notes:
# of Aircraft
Total # of Available
Sampling Points
Routine Coliform
Monitoring
(samples/year)
Routine Coliform
Monitoring TC+
(samples/year)
Additional TC+
(samples/year)
B
C=B*A
D
E=D*0.036
F
290
1,584
576
321
728
663
227
616
575
5,581
290
3,169
1,728
1,283
3,641
3,981
1,589
4,930
7,125
27,734
1,915
10,457
3,801
2,116
4,806
4,379
1,498
4,067
3,796
36,835
69
376
137
76
173
158
54
146
137
1,326
4
22
8
5
10
9
3
9
8
79
TC Sampling
Repeat
(samples/year)
Additional Routine
Coliform Monitoring
(samples/year)
Corrective Action
Coliform Follow-up
Sample (postdisinfection sample)
(samples/year)
G
H
I
72
394
143
80
181
165
56
153
143
1,389
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
98
535
194
108
246
224
77
208
194
1,885
Sampling Labor
Burden
(hours/sample)
J
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
Total Sampling
Burden (hours/year)
K=J(D+G+H+I)
1,043
5,693
2,069
1,152
2,617
2,384
816
2,214
2,066
20,054
Total Sampling
Cost ($/year)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
L=K*AA
26,528
144,823
52,638
29,313
66,563
60,645
20,749
56,328
52,568
510,154
(C) Average number of available sampling points used for > 9 sampling points size category.
(D) One galley and one lavatory TC sample collected per aircraft. Assume 30% of aircraft will sample annually, 30% of aircraft will sample twice annually, 30% of aircraft will sample quarterly, and 10% of aircraft will sample monthly.
(E) Assume 3.6% of coliform samples will be TC+ based on AOC data.
(F) Assume 0% of aircraft performing annual routine coliform monitoring, 0% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 46% of aircraft performing monthly routine coliform monitoring with
initial TC+ sample will perform repeat sampling. Assume 5.7% of aircraft performing repeat sampling will have at least one additional TC+ sample (based on AOC data).
(G) Assume 0% of aircraft performing annual routine coliform monitoring, 0% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 46% of aircraft performing monthly routine coliform monitoring with TC+
will collect three repeat samples within 24 hours of notification of TC+ as an option to immediate corrective action. Assume aircraft with less than three sampling points collect a total of 300mL of samples from all available sampling points.
(H) Additional routine coliform monitoring not specified, assumed no additional routine coliform monitoring samples collected.
(I) Assume 100% of aircraft performing annual routine coliform monitoring, 100% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 54% of aircraft performing monthly routine coliform monitoring will
collect 2 follow-up samples per aircraft that undergoes corrective action flushing and disinfecting.
(J) Assume 0.5 hour for sample collection and for process, storage, and shipping of sample. (Sample set burden is 1 hour for (2) routine samples, 1.5 hours for (3) repeat samples, and 1 hour for (2) corrective action follow-up samples.)
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-13
December 2011
Exhibit H.10a cont.
Analysis
Analysis Labor
Burden
(hours/sample)
Total Analysis
Burden
(hours/year)
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Unit Shipping Cost Total Shipping Cost
($/sample set)
($/year)
N=M(D+G+H+I)
-
O
$108
$108
$108
$108
$108
$108
$108
$108
$108
0
P=O(D/2+G/3+H+I/2)
$
111,490
$
608,658
$
221,224
$
123,195
$
279,748
$
254,875
$
87,202
$
236,733
$
220,931
$
2,144,055
Unit Analysis Cost
($/sample)
Annual Unit
Total Analysis Cost Equipment Cost ($/air
($/year)
carrier/year)
Q
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$22.30
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
R=Q(D+G+H+I)
46,515
253,941
92,298
51,399
116,715
106,338
36,382
98,769
92,176
894,533
S
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Periodic
Equipment
Cost ($/air
carrier)
Total Annual
Equipment Cost
($/year)
T
222
222
222
222
222
222
222
222
222
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total Periodic
Equipment Cost
($)
U
542
2,959
1,076
599
1,360
1,239
424
1,151
1,074
10,425
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
V
605
605
605
605
605
605
605
605
605
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,478
8,067
2,932
1,633
3,708
3,378
1,156
3,138
2,928
28,418
Notes:
(M) Assume all analysis conducted by outside lab.
(O) Estimated courier fees based on costs from various courier services in major cities. Assumed courier services required for each sample set. (Sample set consists of 2 routine samples, 3 repeat samples, and 2
corrective action follow-up samples.) Assumed airport distance of 20-30 miles from lab. Assumed courier would return cooler to air carrier. 100% of shipping costs incurred by TC monitoring.
(Q) Average coliform analysis costs based on costs from various labs across the country. Assume all analysis conducted by outside lab.
(S) Assume air carriers will replace coolers, gel packs, and thermometers once a year. 100% of the unit equipment cost is incurred by total coliform monitoring.
(T) Coolers, gel packs, and thermometers are purchased by air carriers. The costs for this equipment are assumed to be distributed evenly across the 5,581 aircraft. Fractional burden is shown for calculation purposes only.
(U) Assume each aircraft will purchase three new refrigerators. 100% of the refrigerator cost is incurred by total coliform monitoring.
(V) Refrigerators are purchased by air carriers. Assume costs for airlines are distributed evenly among aircraft. Fractional burden is shown for calculation purposes only.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-14
December 2011
Exhibit H.10a cont.
Totals
Recordkeeping
Maintain
Maintenance Log
(hours/sample set)
Report Monitoring
Results
(hours/sample set)
W
X
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
Report Water System Report Water System
Inventory/Changes
Inventory/Changes
(hours/air carrier)
Burden (hours/year)
Y
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
Z
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
2.44
13.34
4.85
2.70
6.13
5.59
1.91
5.19
4.84
47
Labor Cost
($/hour)
AA
$25.44
$25.44
$25.44
$25.44
$25.44
$25.44
$25.44
$25.44
$25.44
Recordkeeping and
Reporting Labor
(hours/year)
AB=((W+X)*
(D/2+G/3+H+I/2))+Z
518
2,827
1,027
572
1,299
1,184
405
1,100
1,026
Recordkeeping
Cost ($/year)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AC=AB*AA
13,173
71,915
26,138
14,556
33,053
30,115
10,303
27,971
26,104
253,329
Total Burden
(hours/year)
AD=K+M+AB
1,561
8,520
3,097
1,724
3,916
3,568
1,221
3,314
3,093
30,012
Total Labor
Cost ($/year)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AE=L+AC
39,701
216,739
78,776
43,869
99,616
90,759
31,052
84,299
78,672
763,483
Total O&M Cost
($/year)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AF=P+R+T
158,547
865,558
314,597
175,192
397,824
362,453
124,008
336,652
314,181
3,049,013
Total Capital
Cost ($)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
AG=V
1,478
8,067
2,932
1,633
3,708
3,378
1,156
3,138
2,928
28,418
Notes:
(Y) Air carriers were required to report their water system inventory within 18 months of promulgation and are required to update that inventory annually. The initial submission of inventory information was assumed to be submitted as
part of the sampling plan. This burden reflects only the annual inventory updates.
(Z) Assume burden for airlines is distributed evenly across aircraft. Fractional burden is shown for calculation purposes only.
(AA) Based on technical labor costs for inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers, from Exhibit H.2.
(AB) Columns W and X applied on a sample set basis. Assume a sample set consists of (2) routine samples, (3) repeat samples, and (2) corrective action follow-up samples.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-15
December 2011
Exhibit H.10b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Coliform Monitoring (2010$)
Compliance Activity
Review Aircraft Monitoring Results
Review Aircraft Water System Inventory Changes
Total
Labor Cost
($/hour)
A
$43.84
$43.84
Unit labor burden
(hours/TC+ sample or
air carrier)
B
0.5
0.5
1.0
TC Samples
Unit Cost ($/TC+
sample or air
carrier)
C=A*B
$
22
$
22
$
44
Total Labor Burden
(hours)
D
663
24
687
Total Cost ($)
E
$
29,066
$
515
$
29,582
Note:
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency
burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.
Sources:
(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.
(D) Total labor burden for reviewing monitoring results = unit labor burden * total number of TC+ samples (Exhibit H.10a). Total labor burden for reviewing inventory = unit
labor burden * # of air carriers.
(E) Total cost for reviewing monitoring results = unit cost * total number of TC+ samples (Exhibit H.10a). Total cost for reviewing inventory = unit cost * total burden for
reviewing inventory.
(F) Air carriers were required to report their water system inventory within 18 months of promulgation and are required to update that inventory annually. The initial
submission of inventory information was assumed to be submitted as part of the sampling plan. This burden reflects only the annual inventory updates.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-16
December 2011
Exhibit H11.a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for O&M Plan (2010$)
Compliance Activity
Update existing O&M manual and practices with ADWR
specific requirements and submit statement to Agency
indicating that O&M manual has been updated
Total
Sources:
Labor Cost
($/hour)
A
One-time Labor Burden
(hours/air carrier)
B
$45.12
Unit Cost
C=A*B
80
80
$
$
3,609
3,609
Total Labor Burden
(hours)
D=B*# Air Carriers
3,760
3,760
Total Cost ($)
E=C*# Air Carriers
$
$
169,642
169,642
(A) Air carrier labor costs from Exhibit H.2. EPA used the transportation inspector category because it was the highest-paid technical labor category. Transportation inspectors
are assumed to have a technical background, as well as some management or oversight responsibility.
(B) Labor hours for developing and implementing O&M plan and submitting verification statement to Agency carried forward from stand-alone ADWR ICR.
(D), (E) U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR developed O&M plans prior to this ICR period. Calculations assume all air carriers spent equal time developing and implementing
O&M plan, regardless of fleet size or aircraft type.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-17
December 2011
Exhibit H.11b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for O&M Plan (2010$)
Compliance Activity
Review system submitted statement indicating that O&M
manual has been updated
Total
Note:
Labor Cost
($/hour)
A
One-time Labor Burden
(hours/air carrier)
B
$43.84
Unit Cost
C=A*B
0.5
0.5
$
$
22
22
Total Labor Burden
(hours)
D=B*# Air Carriers
24
24
Total Cost ($)
E=C*# Air Carriers
$
$
1,030
1,030
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency
burden and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.
(2) This activity completed in the prior ICR period.
Sources:
(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.
(B) Labor hours for reviewing verification statement carried forward from stand-alone ADWR ICR. Calculations assumed O&M plan review was completed as part of compliance
audits.
(D), (E) All U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR developed O&M plans prior to this ICR period. Calculations assumed all Regional Agency offices spent equal time reviewing and
approving O&M plan, regardless of fleet size or aircraft type.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-18
December 2011
Exhibit H12.a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Routine Disinfection and Flushing (2010$)
Recordkeeping
Routine Disinfection and Flushing
Maintain
Maintenance Log for
Disinfection
Activities Costs
($/year)
L=J*K
$
5,168
$
28,213
$
10,254
$
5,710
$
12,967
$
11,814
$
4,042
$
10,973
$
10,241
$
99,383
Total Routine
Disinfection/Flushing
Labor Burden
# of Available
Total # of Available
Unit Chemical Costs
Recordkeeping Labor
(hours/year)
Sampling Points # of Aircraft Sampling Points
($/application)
Cost ($/hour)
A
B
C=B*A
G
K
M=(D*E)+J
1
290
290
$
1
$
25.44
4,266
2
1,584
3,169
$
1
$
25.44
23,290
3
576
1,728
$
1
$
25.44
8,465
4
321
1,283
$
1
$
25.44
4,714
5
728
3,641
$
1
$
25.44
10,704
6
663
3,981
$
1
$
25.44
9,753
7
227
1,589
$
1
$
25.44
3,337
8
616
4,930
$
1
$
25.44
9,058
575
7,125
$
1
$
25.44
8,454
>9
Total
5,581
27,734
3,907
82,041
Notes:
(C) Average number of available sampling points used for> 9 sampling points size category.
(D) Assume 30% of aircraft will perform routine disinfection and flushing quarterly, 30% of aircraft will perform routine disinfection and flushing thrice annually, 30% of aircraft will perform routine disinfection and flushing twice annually, and 10% of aircraft will perform routine disinfection and flushing annually.
(D-H, M-N) These columns are not included in the final burden and cost estimates but are are based on the original cost model for the rule and are included here for completeness.
(F) Based on costs for cleaners of vehicles and equipment from Exhibit H.2.
(G) Chemicals used for disinfection cost approximately $1 per application (based on 12.5% chlorine solution from Harcros Chemicals, which costs $12 per 4 gallon jugs). Inflated to 2010 dollars using CPI multiplier in Labor Rates exhibit.
(K) Based on technical labor costs for inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers, from Exhibit H.2.
No agency burden is incurred for Routine Disinfection and Flushing.
Routine Disinfection
and Flushing
(aircraft/year)
D
813
4,436
1,612
898
2,039
1,858
636
1,725
1,610
15,627
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
Routine Disinfection
and Flushing Labor Unit Disinfection and
Burden
Flushing Cost
(hours/aircraft)
($/hour)
E
F
5
$15.94
5
$15.94
5
$15.94
5
$15.94
5
$15.94
5
$15.94
5
$15.94
5
$15.94
5
$15.94
Total Routine
Disinfection and
Flushing Costs
($/year)
H=(D*E*F)+(D*G)
$65,651
$358,409
$130,268
$72,543
$164,730
$150,084
$51,349
$139,401
$130,096
$1,262,531
Maintain Maintenance Log
for Disinfection Activities
Burden (hours/aircraft)
I
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
H-19
Maintain Maintenance
Log for Disinfection
Activities Burden
(hours/year)
J=D*I
203
1,109
403
224
510
464
159
431
403
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Total O&M Cost
($/year)
N=H+L
70,819
386,622
140,522
78,254
177,698
161,898
55,391
150,374
140,336
1,361,914
December 2011
Exhibit H.12b - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Corrective Action Disinfection and Flushing (2010$)
Unique Corrective
Action Disinfection Repeat Disinfection
and Flushing
and Flushing
(aircraft/year)
(aircraft/year)
D
E
16
0
85
0
31
0
17
0
39
0
36
0
12
0
0
33
31
0
301
0
# of Available
Total # of Available
Sampling Points # of Aircraft Sampling Points
A
B
C=B*A
1
290
290
2
1,584
3,169
3
576
1,728
4
321
1,283
5
728
3,641
6
663
3,981
7
227
1,589
8
616
4,930
575
7,125
>9
Total
5,581
27,734
Notes:
(C) Average number of available sampling points used for> 9 sampling points size category.
Corrective Action Disinfection and Flushing
Corrective Action
Disinfection and
Flushing Labor
Burden
Unit Disinfection and Unit Chemical Costs
(hours/aircraft)
Flushing Cost ($/hour)
($/application)
F
G
H
5
$15.94 $
1
5
$15.94 $
1
5
$15.94 $
1
5
$15.94 $
1
5
$15.94 $
1
5
$15.94 $
1
5
$15.94 $
1
5
$15.94 $
1
5
$15.94 $
1
Recordkeeping
Total Corrective Action
Disinfection and Flushing
Costs ($/year)
I=((D+E)*(F*G))+(D+E)*H)
$1,264
$6,903
$2,509
$1,397
$3,173
$2,891
$989
$2,685
$2,506
$24,316
Maintain Maintenance Maintain Maintenance
Log for Disinfection
Log for Disinfection
Activities Burden
Activities Burden
Recordkeeping
(hours/aircraft)
(hours/year)
Labor Cost ($/hour)
J
K
L
0.25
12
$25.44
0.25
67
$25.44
0.25
24
$25.44
0.25
14
$25.44
0.25
31
$25.44
0.25
28
$25.44
0.25
10
$25.44
0.25
26
$25.44
0.25
24
$25.44
236
Maintain Maintenance
Log for Disinfection
Activities Costs ($/year)
M=K*L
$
312
$
1,701
$
618
$
344
$
782
$
712
$
244
$
662
$
618
$
5,993
Total Corrective Action
Disinfection/Flushing
Labor Burden
(hours/year)
N=((D+E)*F)+K
91
494
180
100
227
207
71
192
179
1,740
Total O&M Cost
($/year)
O=I+M
$
1,576
$
8,604
$
3,127
$
1,742
$
3,955
$
3,603
$
1,233
$
3,347
$
3,123
$
30,309
(D) Assume 100% of aircraft performing annual routine coliform monitoring, 100% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 54% of aircraft performing monthly routine coliform monitoring will perform corrective action disinfection and flushing after a positive routine total
coliform sample. Assume the remainder of aircraft with a TC+ sample will perform repeat sampling. Assume 5.7% of aircraft performing repeat sampling will have at least one additional TC+ sample and will perform corrective action. Additionally, of the aircraft with routine coliform monitoring coliform TC+ samples, assume 0% of the 100% of aircraft performing
annual routine coliform monitoring coliform, 0% of the 100% of aircraft performing twice annual routine coliform monitoring, 0% of the 50% of aircraft performing quarterly routine coliform monitoring, and 46% of aircraft performing monthly routine coliform monitoring will incur costs for corrective action disinfection and flushing. Remainder of aircraft performing
corrective action disinfection and flushing assumed to coordinate schedule with routine disinfection and flushing schedule, and therefore do not incur separate costs for corrective action disinfection and flushing. Assume entire aircraft flushed if either lavatory or galley has a positive total coliform sample. Assume no more than one TC+ per aircraft.
(E) Assumes first flushing/disinfecting is successful.
(D-I, N-O) These columns are not included in the final burden and cost estimates but are are based on the original cost model for the rule and are included here for completeness.
(G) Based on costs for cleaners of vehicles and equipment from Exhibit H.2.
(H) Chemicals used for disinfection cost approximately $1 per application (based on 12.5% chlorine solution from Harcros Chemicals, which costs $12 per 4 gallon jugs). Inflated to 2010 dollars using CPI multiplier in Labor Rates exhibit.
(K), (M) Recordkeeping burden and costs based on total number of corrective action disinfection and flushing events + repeat disinfection and flushing events. Total number of corrective action disinfection and flushing events derived from Exhibit H.10a, column I.
(L) Based on technical labor costs for inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers, and weighers, from Exhibit H.2.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-20
December 2011
Exhibit H.13a - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimates for Compliance Audit (2010$)
Reporting and Recordkeeping Costs Associated with
Compliance Audit of Aircraft PWS
# of Available Sampling Points
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
# of Aircraft
B
290
1,584
576
321
728
663
227
Total # of
Available
Sampling Points
C=B*A
Unit Labor Cost
($/hour)
D
290
3,169
1,728
1,283
3,641
3,981
1,589
$45.12
$45.12
$45.12
$45.12
$45.12
$45.12
$45.12
Totals
Unit labor burden
(hours/air carrier)
E
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
Total Labor Burden
(hours/audit cycle)
F
59
320
116
65
147
134
46
Total Labor Cost
($/audit cycle)
G=D*F
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,646
14,447
5,251
2,924
6,640
6,050
2,070
8
616
4,930
$45.12
24
125 $
5,619
>9
575
7,125
$45.12
24
116 $
5,244
Total
5,581
27,734
1,128 $
50,893
Sources:
(D) Air carrier labor costs from Exhibit H.2. EPA used the transportation inspector category because it was the highest-paid technical labor category. Transportation inspectors are assumed to
have a technical background, as well as some management or oversight responsibility.
(E) EPA assumes that air carriers already conduct major maintenance checks, which include sanitary survey components, every 5 years for each aircraft. Therefore, with the exception of reporting
and recordkeeping burden, no additional costs for sanitary surveys are incurred by air carriers under the ADWR.
(F), (G) All aircraft undergo compliance audits once in 5 years. The Agency will review electronic data for all aircraft at the air carrier office site. Fractional costs incurred by aircraft (assuming even
distribution across aircraft of all sizes) are represented in the exhibit for presentation and calculation purposes only.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-21
December 2011
Exhibit H.13b - Agency Burden and Cost Estimates for Compliance Audit (2010$)
Compliance Activity
Conducting Compliance Audit of Aircraft PWSs
Total
Labor Cost
($/hour)
A
$43.84
Unit Labor Burden
(hours/air carrier)
B
16
16
Unit Cost ($/air
carrier)
C=A*B
$
701
$
701
Total Labor Burden
(hours/audit cycle)
D=B*# Air Carriers
752
752
Total Labor Cost
($/audit cycle)
E=C*# Air Carriers
$
32,967
$
32,967
Note:
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden
and cost calculations shown here are for informational purposes only.
Sources:
(A) Agency labor costs from Exhibit H.2.
(D), (E) Total burden and O&M costs for conducting compliance audits for U.S. air carriers subject to ADWR. All aircraft undergo compliance audits once in 5 years.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-22
December 2011
Exhibit H.14 - Air Carrier Burden and Cost Estimate for Public Notification
Total Coliform-Positive Samples
# of
Available
Sampling
Points
A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
>9
Total
Total # of
# of
Available
Aircraft Sampling Points
B
C=B*A
290
290
1,584
3,169
576
1,728
321
1,283
728
3,641
663
3,981
227
1,589
616
4,930
575
7,125
5,581
27,734
Total Number of Number of
Aircraft
Unique
Percentage of
Conducting
Corrective
Aircraft
Aircraft
Corrective
Actions
Restricting
Conducting
Action
Associated Public Access
PN
Associated with with TC+ Following TC+ Following
TC+ Samples
Samples
Samples
TC+ Sample
E
F
G=E*F
D
49
16
50%
8
267
85
50%
43
97
31
50%
16
54
17
50%
9
123
39
50%
20
112
36
50%
18
38
12
50%
6
104
33
50%
17
97
31
50%
16
942
301
150
E. coli-Positive Samples
Number of
Routine
Samples
H
1,915
10,457
3,801
2,116
4,806
4,379
1,498
4,067
3,796
36,835
Total PN Burden
Number of
Routine
Samples
Positive for E.
coli
I=H*0.0014
3
15
5
3
7
6
2
6
5
52
Total Number of
Aircraft
Conducting PN
J=G+I
11
57
21
12
26
24
8
22
21
202
Total PN Costs
Labor
Burden
per PN
Total PN
Event
Burden Labor Rate Total Labor
(hours)
(hours)
($/hour)
Cost
Total Cost
K
L=J*K
M
N=L*M
O=N
3.5
37 $
62.00
$2,280
$2,280
3.5
201 $
62.00
$12,446
$12,446
3.5
73 $
62.00
$4,524
$4,524
3.5
41 $
62.00
$2,519
$2,519
3.5
92 $
62.00
$5,721
$5,721
3.5
84 $
62.00
$5,212
$5,212
3.5
29 $
62.00
$1,783
$1,783
3.5
78 $
62.00
$4,841
$4,841
3.5
73 $
62.00
$4,518
$4,518
707
$43,844
$43,844
Note:
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden and cost calculations
shown here are for informational purposes only.
Sources:
(D) Derived from column I, Exhibit H.10a, which calculates number of followup samples following corrective action. Each aircraft with a total coliform-positive sample takes two followup samples after
completing corrective action.
(E) From column D, Exhibit H.12b. Includes only those corrective actions that do not overlap with routine disinfection and flushing. Assumes a one-to-one correspondence between corrective action and
aircraft.
(F) EPA assumption. Air carriers that choose to take longer than 72 hours to conduct corrective action must restrict public access and provide public notification.
(G) Assumes each aircraft has no more than one TC+ sample.
(H) From column D, Exhibit H.10a.
(I) Percentage of routine samples positive for E. coli from AOC data. All air carriers with positive E. coli samples must restrict public access and provide public notification on the affected aircraft. Note that
E. coli-positive repeat samples also trigger the same requirements; however they occur so rarely that they do not significantly affect the number of PN events, so they were not included.
(J) Note that a sample can be positive for both total coliform and E. coli at the same time. By accounting for each type of sample separately, EPA may be overestimating the number of events requiring
public notification. However, they must be accounted for separately, because the public notification requirements vary for each.
(K) EPA estimate, based on burden for preparing a Tier 2 public notice in the Public Water System Supervision ICR. Includes time needed to prepare notice for crew, post placard for passengers (where
required), and report to EPA.
(M) Loaded labor rate for transportation, storage, and distribution managers from Exhibit H.2.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-23
December 2011
Exhibit H.15a - Total Airline Burden Incurred During the First 25 Years After ADWR Promulgation
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Total
Air Carrier
Implementation
Air Carrier
Sampling Plan
Monitoring TC Air Carriers
376
376
752
235
235
470
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
30,012
690,281
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
O&M Plan- Air
Carriers
1,880
1,880
3,760
H-24
Routine
Disinfection &
Flushing
Recordkeeping Air Carriers
Corrective Action
Disinfection &
Flushing
Recordkeeping Air Carriers
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
3,907
89,854
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
236
5,418
Self-Inspection
Reporting and
Public
Recordkeeping Notification Air Carriers
Air Carriers
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
226
5,189
December 2011
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
707
16,265
Exhibit H.15b - Total Agency Burden Incurred During the First 25 Years After ADWR
Promulgation
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Agency
Implementation
1,415
1,415
2,830
Agency Sampling Monitoring - TC
Agency Annual Plan Information
Agency
Administration
Review
Oversight
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
5,160
118,680
106
106
212
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
687
15,790
O&M Plan
CompletionCompliance AuditAgency Review
Agency
12
12
24
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
150
3,459
Total
Note:
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since this rule is
directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden and cost calculations shown here are for
informational purposes only.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-25
December 2011
Exhibit H.16a - Total Airline Cost Incurred During First 25 Years After ADWR Promulgation
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Total
Monitoring Monitoring TC Air
Air Carrier
Air Carrier
Monitoring - TC
TC Air
Carriers
Implementation Monitoring Plan Air Carriers Labor Carriers O&M
Capital
Corrective Action
Routine
Disinfection &
Disinfection &
Self-Inspection
Flushing
Flushing
Reporting and
Public
O&M Plan Air Recordkeeping - Recordkeeping - Recordkeeping Notification Air Carriers
Carriers
Air Carriers
Air Carriers
Air Carriers
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
16,964
16,964
33,928
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10,603
10,603
21,205
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
763,483
17,560,098
$
$
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 3,049,013
$ 70,127,296
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
3,158
72,623
84,821
84,821
169,642
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
99,383
2,285,804
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
5,993
137,834
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
10,179
234,106
$
$
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$
43,844
$ 1,008,405
Note:
Air carriers conducting monitoring will incur capital costs for refrigerators beginning in year 3. Assumes air carriers will need to replace refrigerators every 10 years. As a
modeling assumption, capital costs are evenly distributed across the affected years.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-26
December 2011
Exhibit H.16b - Total Agency Cost Incurred During First 25 Years After ADWR
Promulgation
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Total
Agency
Implementation
Agency Annual
Administration
Agency
Monitoring Plan
Monitoring TC Agency
Oversight
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
62,033
62,033
124,065
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
226,210
5,202,840
4,636
4,636
9,272
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
29,582
680,375
O&M Plan
Completion
Agency
Compliance
Review
Audit - Agency
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
515
515
1,030
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
6,593
151,649
Note:
(1) Total Agency burden and labor costs for ADWR are accounted for in the PWSS Program ICR since
this rule is directly implemented through the EPA Regions. Agency burden and cost calculations shown
here are for informational purposes only.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-27
December 2011
Exhibit H.17a - Airline Respondents for First 25 Years after ADWR Promulgation
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Total
Air Carrier
Implementation
Air Carrier
Sampling Plan
Monitoring TC Air Carriers
O&M Plan- Air
Carriers
23.5
23.5
47
23.5
23.5
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
23.5
23.5
47
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-28
Routine
Corrective Action
Disinfection &
Disinfection &
Flushing
Flushing
Recordkeeping - Recordkeeping Air Carriers
Air Carriers
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
Self-Inspection
Reporting and
Public
Recordkeeping Notification Air Carriers
Air Carriers
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
December 2011
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
47
Exhibit H.17b - Agency Respondents for First 25 Years after ADWR Promulgation
Agency
Implementation
Agency Annual
Administration
Agency
Monitoring Plan
Monitoring - TC
Agency
Oversight
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
5
5
-
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
-
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
5
5
-
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Total
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Year
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-29
O&M Plan
Completion
Compliance Audit Agency Review
Agency
December 2011
Exhibit H.18a - Airline Responses for First 25 Years after ADWR Promulgation
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Total
Air Carrier
Implementation
Air Carrier
Sampling Plan
Monitoring TC Air Carriers
47
47
94
23.5
23.5
47
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
120,371
2,768,527
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
O&M Plan- Air
Carriers
23.5
23.5
47
H-30
Routine
Corrective Action
Disinfection &
Disinfection &
Flushing
Flushing
Recordkeeping - Recordkeeping Air Carriers
Air Carriers
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
15,627
359,416
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
360
Self-Inspection
Reporting and
Public
Recordkeeping Notification Air Carriers
Air Carriers
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
216
December 2011
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
202
4,647
Exhibit H.18b - Agency Responses for First 25 Years after ADWR Promulgation
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Total
Agency
Implementation
Agency Annual
Administration
Agency
Monitoring Plan
Monitoring - TC
Agency
Oversight
25
25
50
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
23.5
23.5
47
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
1,373
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-31
O&M Plan
Completion
Compliance Audit Agency Review
Agency
23.5
23.5
47
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
December 2011
Exhibit H.19a - Airline Schedule
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Air Carrier
Air Carrier
Implementation Monitoring Plan
50%
50%
Monitoring - TC
Air Carriers
Labor and O&M
Monitoring - TC
Air Carriers
Capital
50%
50%
O&M Plan Air
Carriers
Disinfection
& Flushing
Routine - Air
Carriers
Flushing
Corrective
Action - Air
Carriers
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
SelfInspections Air
Public
Carriers
Notification
50%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
11%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
Note: Air carriers conducting monitoring will incur capital costs for refrigerators beginning in year 3. Assumes air carriers will need to replace
refrigerators every 10 years. As a modeling assumption, capital costs are evenly distributed across the affected years.
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
H-32
December 2011
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Exhibit H.19b - Agency Schedule
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Agency
Implementation
Agency Annual
Administration
50%
50%
Agency
Monitoring Plan
Monitoring - TC
Agency
Oversight
50%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Microbial Rules ICR - ADWR
O&M Plan
Agency Review
Compliance
Audit
Agency
50%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
H-33
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
20%
December 2011
| File Type | application/pdf |
| File Title | Microbial Renewal ICR 2012 Appendices |
| File Modified | 2012-07-25 |
| File Created | 2008-07-25 |