|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OMB Control No. 0694-0119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration Date: April 2013 |
DEFENSE INDUSTRIAL BASE ASSESSMENT: U.S. Infrastructure for Underwater Acoustic Transduction Systems
|
Company Survey |
|
SCOPE OF ASSESSMENT |
The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), Office of Technology Evaluation (OTE), in cooperation with the Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research (ONR), is conducting an assessment of the U.S. Underwater Acoustics Transduction industry. The purpose of this assessment is to analyze the health and competitiveness of the industry and to develop recommendations to ensure the ability of the industry to support Navy missions and programs. |
RESPONSE TO THIS SURVEY IS REQUIRED BY LAW |
A response to this survey is required by law (50 U.S.C. app. Sec. 2155). Failure to respond can result in a maximum fine of $10,000, imprisonment of up to one year, or both. Information furnished herewith is deemed confidential and will not be published or disclosed except in accordance with Section 705 of the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C App. Sec. 2155). Section 705 prohibits the publication or disclosure of this information unless the President determines that its withholding is contrary to the national defense. Information will not be shared with any non-government entity, other than in aggregate form. The information will be protected pursuant to the appropriate exemptions from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), should it be the subject of a FOIA request.
Not withstanding any other provision of law, no person is required to respond to nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
|
BURDEN ESTIMATE AND REQUEST FOR COMMENT |
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 14 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information to BIS Information Collection Officer, Room 6883, Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C. 20230, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (OMB Control No. 0694-0119), Washington, D.C. 20503. |
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
Section General Instructions |
A. |
Your company is required to complete this survey using an Excel template, which can be downloaded from the BIS website: http://www.bis.doc.gov/underwater_acoustics/index.htm. At your request, BIS staff will e-mail the Excel survey template directly to your company. For your convenience, a PDF version of the survey is available on the BIS website to aid internal data collection. DO NOT submit the PDF version of your company’s response to BIS. |
B. |
Respond to every question. Surveys that are not fully completed will be returned for completion. Use comment boxes to provide any information to supplement responses provided in the survey form. Make sure to record a complete answer in the cell provided, even if the cell does not appear to expand to fit all the information.
DO NOT COPY AND PASTE RESPONSES WITHIN THIS SURVEY. Survey inputs should be made manually, by typing in responses or by use of a drop-down menu. The use of copy and paste can disrupt the data collection process. If your survey response is corrupted as a result of copy and paste responses, a new survey will be sent to you for immediate completion.
|
C. |
Do not disclose any classified relationships in this survey form. However, aggregated financials, employment, R&D expenditures, etc. are permitted. |
D. |
Questions related to this survey should be directed to: Matthew Sigmund, 202-482-0634 - [email protected]; Laura DeMaria, 202-482-7804 - [email protected]; or Mark Crawford, 202-482-8239 - [email protected]. |
E. |
If information is not available from your records in the form requested, contact our office to see if you may furnish estimates. |
F. |
Upon completion, review and certification of the survey, transmit the survey via e-mail to: [email protected]. |
G. |
For letter correspondence to the Office of Technology Evaluation (OTE), please write to:
Brad Botwin, Director, Industrial Studies Office of Technology Evaluation, Room 1093 U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20230
Please do not submit completed surveys to this address; all surveys must be submitted electronically. |
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
Section - Definitions Definitions |
ACOMMS |
Short for Acoustic Communications. An underwater acoustic system designed to communicate (transmit or receive) acoustical data via an acoustic medium (water or air). |
Acoustic Vector Sensor |
A device that concurrently measures acoustic pressure and acoustic particle velocity for the purpose of estimating intensity and direction of propagation of sound at a point in an acoustic field. |
Active SONAR |
An underwater acoustic system relying on both a user transmitted probe signal and the subsequent detection of returning acoustic signals. |
Air-Deployed Sonar Systems |
Any transducer-based system used for underwater acoustic signal generation or detection and installed on or deployed from aircraft. |
Applied Research |
Research for the purpose of applying knowledge or technologies to improve specific problems, devices, methods, or systems. Applied research often has a known potential application. |
Basic Research |
Research resulting in new knowledge or improved understanding of subject area. Such research may also result in new discovery or invention of ideas, methods or devices. |
Basic Research Underwater Acoustic Systems |
Any transducer-based system or subsystem components used in basic research and/or testing for underwater acoustic signal generation or detection. |
Calibration |
The process of testing a tranducer to determine its performance including but not limiting to its transmit or receive sensitivity, impedance in water, directional factor, and electroacoustic efficiency. |
Calibration Facilities |
Specialized facilities designed for measuring various transducer system responses to specific inputs (acoustic, shakers, signal telemetry, etc). |
Ceramic |
Any piezoelectric, polycrystalline material based on ferroelectric oxides, such as lead zirconate titanate (PZT) ceramics. |
Command Organization |
Primary military organization (e.g., NAVSEA, NAVAIR, SPAWAR, etc). |
Company |
A for profit organization including sole proprietoryship, partnership, company, or corporation. |
Division Facilities |
Specialized facilities under the direction of a division within a larger command organization. |
Educational Institution |
Any institution providing college-level courses for academic credit. |
Educational Program |
A combination of courses from an educational institution leading to a certificate or degree. |
Electrode Adhesion |
The degree of adhesion of the electrode (e.g. silver, nickel, etc.) to the piezoelement |
Electro-Dynamic Actuators and Force Drivers |
Piezoelectric and other electromechanical actuators with the prinicple functioin of delivering a force or displacement as opposed to the radiation of sound. |
Environmental Parameters |
Environmental parameters influencing acoustic propagation, e.g., temperature, pressure, density, bulk modulus, shear speed, attenuation, salinity, sound speed, etc. |
Environmentally Controlled Facilities |
Specialized measurement facilities in enclosed areas capable of manipulating environmental factors (e.g., temperature, pressure, etc). |
Facility |
A physical space for performing specific work or activity. |
Institutional Facility |
A specialized design/manufacturing facility directly managed/owned by an educational institution. |
Integrated Electronics |
The collection of electronic components on an electronic circuit board, membrane or other medium. |
Lake/Ocean Facilities |
Specialized measurement facilities in lakes or open ocean ranges (e.g., Lake Pend Oreille, AUTEC, etc). |
Magnetics Design |
The steps, procedures, and results associated with designing inductive tuning elements and impedance (step-up and step-down) transformers that are often necessary in an acoustic transducer subsystem. |
Magnetostrictive materials |
Ferromagnetic materials alter in shape when subject to magnetization. |
Manufacturing Standards |
The standards and expectations associated with quality and tolerances associated with a particular manufacturing process. |
Material Bonding |
The bonding of two materials. |
National Security |
A collective term encompassing national defense and homeland security, including the military, civilian intelligence agencies, border security, etc. |
National Security Systems |
Any transducer-based system that utilizes underwater acoustics for purposes of national security. |
Oceanographic Systems: |
Underwater acoustic systems designed to measure oceanographic features, e.g., acoustic Doppler profilers, hydrographic systems, bathymetric systems, etc. |
Passive SONAR |
An underwater acoustic (SOund, Navigation, And Ranging) system used to detect acoustic signals with receivers only (the system does not genearate a probing acoustical signal). |
Piezoceramic element |
A piezoelectric ceramic element (such as a bar, plate, cylinder, etc.) made from a ceramic based compositioin exhibiting piezoelectric properties. |
Piezocrystal element |
A piezoelectric crystal element (such as a bar, plate, disk, etc.) made from a crystaline composition (such as quartz or PMN-PT single crystal) exhibiting piezoelectric properties. |
Piezoelectric |
The physical property of a material that converts mechanical energy into electrical energy (electromechanical piezoelectric effect) or mechanical energy into electrical energy (mechano-electric piezoelectric effect). |
Potting |
The process of enclosing (or so called potting) an acoustic transducer with a waterproof solid layer, usually comprised of polyurethane, rubber, or plastic. |
Process Control |
Methods and controlls associated with manufacturing (or processing) piezoelectric materials and/or transducers. |
R&D |
Research and Development: All steps associated with the research and/or development of a product. |
RDT&E |
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation. |
Single Crystal |
Any relaxor-based, piezoelectric single crystal material, such as lead magnesium niobate-lead titanate (PMN-PT). |
Sonar Transducer Relability Improvement Program (STRIP) |
A US Navy program with emphasis on reliability improvement of sonar transducers and support of devices used in the Fleet (currently administered by NAVSEA/NUWC). |
Sub-assembly |
Any component of a system, which may or may not work independently. |
Submarine Sonar Systems |
Any transducer-based system used for underwater acoustic signal generation or detection and installed on or deployed from submarines. |
Surface Ship Sonar Systems |
Any transducer-based system used for underwater acoustic signal generation or detection and installed on or deployed from surface vessels. |
Technical Personnel/Engineering Force |
Technically trained/educated workforce directly involved with aspects of design and/or manufacturing of transducer products and SONAR systems. |
Telemetry |
Systems and subsystem components that involve the transmission of acoustic signals by wire, air, or water. Such systems may include conversion of signals to higher carrier frequencies or to different forms of energy such as electromagnetic, light, mechanical or acoustical. |
Tons |
2000 pounds (0.907 metric ton) |
Transducer |
Any device that converts acoustical energy into electrical energy, and vice-versa. |
Transducer Design |
The design and description of acoustical transducers (projectors and recevers) and related performance pedictions or estimates |
Transducer Manufacturing |
The building or production of acoustic transducers with commercialization as the goal or end purpose. |
Transducer Products |
Any transducer device or subsystem comprising an electroacoustic transducer that may be commercially available or made available to a navy or research application or demonstration. |
Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems |
Any transducer-based system used for underwater acoustic communications. |
Underwater Imaging or Scanning Systems |
Any transducer-based system used for underwater scanning applications. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 1.c Company Structure and Operations |
A. |
State the number of underwater transducer or sonar system fabrication or design facilities that your company operated in the following locations from 2008-2012: |
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 - Estimate |
|
Number of Facilities |
Facility Function |
Inside U.S. |
Outside U.S. |
Inside U.S. |
Outside U.S. |
Inside U.S. |
Outside U.S. |
Inside U.S. |
Outside U.S. |
Inside U.S. |
Outside U.S. |
Design |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sonar System Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducer System Fabrication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Indicate the number of underwater sonar system fabrication facilities that your company currently operates with security clearances: |
|
Indicate the number of underwater transducer system fabrication facilities that your company currently operates with security clearances: |
|
Enter the CAGE numbers for each cleared facility below - #1: |
Enter the CAGE numbers for each cleared facility - #2: |
CAGE 1: |
|
CAGE 1: |
|
|
CAGE 2: |
|
CAGE 2: |
|
|
CAGE 3: |
|
CAGE 3: |
|
|
CAGE 4: |
|
CAGE 4: |
|
|
Indicate the number of underwater transducer and sonar system fabrication facilities that your company currently operates with security clearances: |
|
Enter the CAGE numbers for each cleared facility below - #3: |
Enter the CAGE numbers for each cleared facility - #4: |
CAGE 1: |
|
CAGE 1: |
|
|
CAGE 2: |
|
CAGE 2: |
|
CAGE 3: |
|
CAGE 3: |
|
CAGE 4: |
|
CAGE 4: |
|
Indicate the number of underwater transducer and sonar system fabrication facilities that your company currently operates with security clearances: |
|
Enter the CAGE numbers for each cleared facility below - #5: |
Enter the CAGE numbers for each cleared facility - #6: |
CAGE 1: |
|
CAGE 1: |
|
|
CAGE 2: |
|
CAGE 2: |
|
|
CAGE 3: |
|
CAGE 3: |
|
|
CAGE 4: |
|
CAGE 4: |
|
|
Comments: |
|
C. |
Please specify the technology sectors that your company serves through the provision of design and/or fabrication services for underwater transducer and sonar system products: |
Company Capabilities > |
Sonar Design |
Sonar Fabrication |
Transducer Design |
|
|
Transducer Fabrication |
Air-Deployed Sonar Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Research Underwater Acoustic Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed Netted Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Object Detection Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Submarine Sonar Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surface Ship Sonar Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwater Acoustic Communication Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwater Scanning Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
UUV/AUV Acoustic Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geophysical Exploration Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrographic Survey Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Object Detection Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other National Security Systems (Specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other National Security Systems (Specify) |
|
|
Other (Specify) |
|
|
Other (Specify) |
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
Section 2.a Current Product Types - U.S. Customers |
A. |
State whether your company designs and/or manufacturers underwater acoustics, vibration, or sonar systems-related products for each class of U.S. customer listed below . Respond to each cell. |
Product Type |
DoD/National Security |
Oil Industry |
Fishing |
Hydrographic Surveying |
Non-DOD Object Detection |
Oceanographic |
Other (specify) |
Piezoceramics for transducers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other piezoelectric materials for transducers (e.g., crystals, polymers, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetostrictive materials for transducers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducers based on piezoceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducers based on piezoelectric materials other than ceramics (e.g., piezocrystals such as PMN-PT or other single crystals, polymers, or other) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducers based on magnetostrictive materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telemetry for transducers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging materials for sonar systems (encapsulants, connectors, other parts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Underwater Vibration Sensors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
If your company currently manufactures and/or designs piezoceramic or non-piezoceramic transducers, or vibration sensors, as indicated above -- then state the percentage of each business line that utilize each of the material types below. Indicate this percentage for each type of U.S. customer, as applicable. Select "N.A." if this question is not applicable to your company. Respond to each cell. |
|
DoD/National Security |
Oil Industry |
Fishing |
Hydrographic Surveying |
Non-DOD Object Detection |
Oceanographic |
Other (specify) |
Piezoceramic Transducers |
Using PZT ceramic materials (Lead-Zirconium-Titanate) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using non-PZT ceramic materials (Barium-Titanate or other) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Piezoceramic Transducers |
Using piezocrystal materials (PMN-PT or other relaxor type single crystals) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using magnetostrictive materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other materials (e.g., polymers) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Underwater Vibration Sensors |
Using PZT ceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using non-PZT ceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using piezocrystal materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using magnetostrictive materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other materials (e.g., polymers) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
|
Section 2.b Current Product Types - Non-U.S. Customers |
A. |
State whether your company designs and/or manufacturers underwater acoustics, vibration, or sonar systems-related products for each class of Non-U.S. customers listed below . Respond to each cell. |
Product Type |
Non-U.S. Defense/ National Security |
Oil Industry |
Fishing |
Hydrographic Surveying |
Non-DOD Object Detection |
Oceanographic |
Other (specify) |
Piezoceramics for transducers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other piezoelectric materials for transducers (e.g., crystals, polymers, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetostrictive materials for transducers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducers based on piezoceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducers based on non-piezoceramic materials other than ceramics (e.g., piezocrystals such as PMN-PT or other single crystals, polymers, or other) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducers based on magnetostrictive materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telemetry for transducers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Packaging materials for sonar systems (encapsulants, connectors, other parts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Underwater Vibration Sensors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
If your company currently manufactures and/or designs piezoceramic or non-piezoceramic transducers as indicated above, identify the percentage of each business line that utilize each of the material types below. Indicate this percentage for each type of Non-U.S. customer, as applicable. Select "N.A." if this question is not applicable to your company. Respond to each cell. |
Product Type |
Non-U.S. Defense/ National Security |
Oil Industry |
Fishing |
Hydrographic Surveying |
Non-DOD Object Detection |
Oceanographic |
Other (specify) |
Piezoceramic Transducers |
Using PZT ceramic materials (Lead-Zirconium-Titanate) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using non-PZT ceramic materials (Barium-Titanate or other) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Piezoceramic Transducers |
Using piezocrystal materials (PMN-PT or other relaxor type single crystals) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using magnetostrictive materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using materials (e.g., polymers) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Underwater Vibration Sensors |
Using PZT ceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using non-PZT ceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using piezocrystal materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using magnetostrictive materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other materials (e.g., polymers) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 3.b Manufacturing of Piezoelectric Material and Elements for Underwater Acoustic Transducers |
|
A. |
State whether your company can design and/or manufacture transduction materials for underwater acoustic transducers for each technical property designated below. If so, indicate the percentate (%) for DoD/National Security, bio-medical, or commercial (e.g., fishing, oil industry, etc.)." |
|
Technical Property |
General Purpose/R&D |
Passive SONAR Sensor |
Active SONAR Element |
Mine-Hunting |
Doppler Profiling |
Side-Scan SONAR |
Acoustic Comms |
|
Capable of operation in surf zone (< 20m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capable of operation in littorals (< 200m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capable of operation in deep ocean (> 3000m) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational below 500 Hz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational between 500 Hz - 2 kHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational between 2 kHz - 10 kHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational between 10 kHz - 50 kHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operational between 50 kHz - 2 MHz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Omnidirectional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power/Energy requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size, Weight, or Packaging Constraints |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capable of measuring vector acoustic field |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Specify which geometries your company considers as unique or special capabilties of your manufacturing process: |
|
|
Type of Geometry |
Unique/Special Capability? |
Maximum Diameter (in centimeters) |
Description of Unique/Special Capabilities |
|
|
Bar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hollow Cylinders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tubes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. |
Does your company have the capability to do high-field testing of ceramics? |
|
|
|
|
If "Yes," what is the maximum voltage you high-field (> 1 kvolts/cm) testing can achieve? Provide your answer in kilovolts (kV). |
|
|
|
|
If "Yes," what is the minimum electrode separation your high-field testing can achieve? Provide your answer in centimeters. |
|
|
|
|
D. |
Identify the types of inventory of manufacturing materials and/or finished piezoelectric material products that your company maintains. |
|
|
On average, what is the average supply level of finished piezoelectric material products kept in inventory? |
|
|
|
|
On average, what is the average supply level of manufacturing materials kept in inventory? |
|
|
|
|
E. |
Does your company manufacture its own piezoelectric powders? |
|
If "Yes" state your production capacity and the locations of your production facilities |
|
|
Total Number of Production Facilities |
|
Annual Production Capability -U.S. Locations |
|
|
Total Number of Production Facilities |
|
Annual Production Capability - Non-U.S. Locations |
|
|
Production Facility Name |
City |
Country |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State the percentage of materials produced annually that is attributed to your Non-U.S. piezoelect+C17ric powder manufacturing facilities |
|
|
State the percentage of the piezoelectric materials that your company uses in any given year that is imported (excluding production from company-owned Non-U.S. facilities) |
|
|
State the number of Non-U.S. suppliers from which you currently import piezoelectric materials |
|
|
F. |
Identify the locations of the production facilities for your company's Non-U.S. Suppliers of piezoelectric materials. |
|
|
Production Facility Owner |
Production Facility Name |
City |
Country |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
G. |
Identify the procedures your company routinely uses to insure that piezoceramic materials identified below meet U.S. Navy-type specifications for ceramics. Select all practices that apply. |
|
|
|
Material Type |
Testing Processes Utilized for Designated Materials |
|
|
Navy Type I |
|
|
Test received samples for impedance data and compare to previous products for consistency |
|
|
|
Navy Type II |
|
|
Evaluate samples received per purchase specification: size, capacitance, and/or dissipation |
|
|
|
Navy Type III |
|
|
Rely on suppliers statements/representations that their materials are equivalent |
|
|
|
Navy Type IV |
|
|
Measure the piezoelectric properties of sample materials according to IEEE standards No 176 on piezoelectricity |
|
|
|
Navy Type V |
|
|
Measure the piezoelectric properties according to other methods |
|
|
|
Navy Type VI |
|
|
Measure completed transducers to ensure they meet specs |
|
|
|
Polyvinylidene flouride (PVDF) |
|
|
Other (describe below) |
|
|
|
Single Crystal PMN-PT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single Crystal PIN-PMN-PT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Galfenol |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terfenol-D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lithium Sulfate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
H. |
Does your company have the capability to design and develop improved piezoceramics? |
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 3.c Capacity Utilization Rate for Materials Production |
A. |
Report your company's average manufacturing capacity utilization rate for transduction materials (ceramics, crystals, etc) at your U.S.-based facilities for 2008-2012. |
|
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 Estimated |
Utilization Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
State the actual transduction material elements possible per month at your U.S.-based manufacturing facilities in 2011. |
|
|
C. |
Indicate the number of transduction material elements produced at your facilities for each type of geometry in 2011. |
Type of Geometry |
Number of Elements |
Piezeo-Ceramics |
Single Crystals |
Other |
|
Tubes |
|
|
|
Disks |
|
|
|
Rings |
|
|
|
Plates |
|
|
|
Hemispheres |
|
|
|
Made from Ceramics |
|
|
|
Single Crystals |
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
D. |
State the maximum number of transduction material elements possible per month at your U.S.-based manufacturing facilities in 2011. |
|
How long would it take (in months) to achieve this maximum capacity rate? |
|
E. |
Indicate whether all of your transduction material manufacturing facilities will be operating through 2015. If "No," explain below. |
|
|
F. |
In what year did your company achieve the maximum number of transduction material elements per month? Provide that maximum number. |
Year |
|
|
Max. Number |
|
G. |
What are the critical issues (technology, materials, workforce, etc) needed to maintain this capability at your production facilities to manufacture at the maximum utilization rate? |
|
H. |
Does your company have a long-term plan to increase or reduce the number of product lines that is produces? If "Yes," describe below 1) the product lines changes and 2) reasons for change. |
Yes/No |
|
I. |
Does your company have a long-term plan to increase or reduce the volume of production for certain product lines? If "Yes," describe below 1) the affected product lines and 2) the reasons for change. |
Yes/No |
|
J. |
Do your company's commercial business (non-military) demands severely limit your company's ability to supply materials or products to the military or vice versa? If "Yes," describe these limitations below |
Yes/No |
|
|
|
K. |
Do your company's military business (non-commercial) demands severely limit your company's ability to supply materials or products to the commercial/industrial sectors? If "Yes," describe these limitations below. |
Yes/No |
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 5.c Current Testing/Calibration Facilities - Lake/Ocean Facilities |
A. |
Please provide information about lake and/or ocean facilities managed by your company/organization. |
Name of Facility |
Street Address |
City |
State |
Physical Dimensions (Meters) |
Usable Frequency Range (in Hz) |
Appropriate for Individual Sensor Testing/Calibration? |
Appropriate for Full-Scale System Testing/Calibration? |
Environmental Factors Controlled at this Facility - Select All That Apply |
Number of Technical Support Staff Assigned to Facility |
Status of Facility Infrastructure |
Challenges to Maintaining this Facility |
Usable Length |
Usable Width |
Usable Depth |
1. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
B. |
For each lake and/or ocean facility mentioned above, identify any critical and/or recommended updates to each facility's infrastructure below.
Note: Only provide descriptions of physical upgrades. Do not list cost estimates. |
Name of Facility |
Type of Facility |
Critical Updates |
|
Recommended Updates |
|
1. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
2. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
3. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
4. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
5. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
6. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
7. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
8. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
9. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
10. |
0 |
|
|
|
|
C. |
Identify any other lake and/or ocean facilities that your company operates for testing/calibrating underwater transduction devices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name of Facility |
Street Address |
City |
State |
Physical Dimensions (Meters) |
Usable Frequency Range (in Hz) |
Appropriate for Individual Sensor Testing/Calibration? |
Appropriate for Full-Scale System Testing/Calibration? |
Environmental Factors Controlled at this Facility - Select All That Apply |
Number of Technical Support Staff Assigned to Facility |
Status of Facility Infrastructure |
Challenges to Maintaining this Facility |
Usable Length |
Usable Width |
Usable Depth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
Section 5.g Capability to Calibrate Specific Underwater Acoustic Transducer Products |
A. |
State whether your company/organization/university can test and/or calibrate underwater acoustic transducers in accordance with each of the following technical specifications. Do you plan to retain your capabilities through 2015, or will you develop this capability by 2015? |
Technical Specifications for Receiver Calibration |
Mode of Calibration* |
Currently Capable? |
Capable Through 2015? |
Free Field Voltage Sensitivity (FFVS) Primary Calibration Methods |
|
|
|
|
Conventional / Free Field Reciprocity (Bobber 2.3.1) |
|
|
|
Two Transducer Reciprocity (Bobber 2.3.2) |
|
|
|
Self Reciprocity (Bobber 2.3.3) |
|
|
|
Cylindrical Wave Reciprocity (Bobber 2.3.4) |
|
|
|
Plane Wave Reciprocity (Bobber 2.3.5) |
|
|
|
Tube Reciprocity - Propagating Wave (Bobber 2.3.6) |
|
|
|
Coupler Reciprocity (Bobber 2.3.7) |
|
|
|
Transfer Coupler Reciprocity (Zalesak) |
|
|
|
Two Projector Null Method (Bobber 2.4) |
|
|
|
Free Field Voltage Sensitivity (FFVS) Secondary Calibration Methods |
|
|
|
|
Comparison Calibrations |
|
|
|
|
Free Field Comparison Calibration (Bobber 2.2.1) |
|
|
|
Standard Projector Calibration (Bobber 2.2.2) |
|
|
|
Small Tank Calibration (Bobber 2.2.3) |
|
|
|
Impedance Method Calibrations |
|
|
|
Compliance Controlled (Bobber 2.5.1) |
|
|
|
Inertia Controlled (Bobber 2.5.2) |
|
|
|
Static (Low Frequency) Calibration Methods |
|
|
|
Dunking machine (Bobber 2.6.3) |
|
|
|
Golendov calibrator (Bobber 2.6.3) |
|
|
|
Pressure Gradient / Particle Velocity Measurements |
|
|
|
Free Field Calibration (Bobber 2.10) |
|
|
|
Standing Wave Calibration |
|
|
|
|
Rigid walled tube (Bobber 2.10) |
|
|
|
Compliant / slow wave tube (Bastyr, Lauchle and McConnell) |
|
|
|
Electrical Impedance / Admittance |
|
|
|
Efficiency |
|
|
|
Direct Method (Bobber 2.14.1) |
|
|
|
Impedance Method (Bobber 2.14.2) |
|
|
|
Dynamic Range - Hydrophone (Bobber 2.15) |
|
|
|
Linearity - Projector and Receiver (Bobber 2.15) |
|
|
|
Equivalent Noise Pressure (Bobber 2.16.2) |
|
|
|
Directivity Patterns |
|
|
|
Far Field |
|
|
|
Near Field |
|
|
|
Uniform Radiator |
|
|
|
Non-uniform Radiator |
|
|
|
Beam Width |
|
|
|
Minor Lobe Level |
|
|
|
Directivity Factor / Index |
|
|
|
|
Parameter Ranges |
|
|
|
|
|
Frequency range and resolution |
|
|
|
|
|
Temperature range |
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure range |
|
|
|
|
|
Angular resolution for beam patterns |
|
|
|
|
|
Nominal uncertainty |
|
|
|
|
Magnetic Characteristics |
Degree of Accuracy |
|
|
|
Magnetic orientation |
+/- 1 |
|
|
|
|
Inertial orientation |
+/- 5 |
|
|
|
|
Magnetic orientation |
+/- 10 |
|
|
|
|
Inertial orientation |
+/- 15 |
|
|
B. |
Indicate whether your company can test and/or calibrate underwater acoustic transducers in accordance with each of the following technical specifications. For each, indicate whether your company plans to retain this capability through 2015, or will develop this capability by 2015. |
Technical Specifications for Projector Calibration |
Mode of Calibration* |
Currently Capable? |
Capable Through 2015? |
Transmit Voltage Response |
|
|
|
Transmit Current Response |
|
|
|
Source Level Maximum |
|
|
|
Efficiency |
|
|
|
Direct Method (Bobber 2.14.1) |
|
|
|
Impedance Method (Bobber 2.14.2) |
|
|
|
Linearity (Bobber 2.15) |
|
|
|
Electrical Impedance / Admittance |
|
|
|
Directivity Patterns |
|
|
|
Far Field |
|
|
|
Near Field |
|
|
|
Uniform Radiator |
|
|
|
Non-uniform Radiator |
|
|
|
Beam Width |
|
|
|
Minor Lobe Level |
|
|
|
Directivity Factor / Index |
|
|
|
Parameter Ranges |
|
|
|
Frequency range and resolution |
|
|
|
Temperature range |
|
|
|
Pressure range |
|
|
|
Angular resolution for beam patterns |
|
|
|
Nominal uncertainty |
|
|
|
Magnetic Characteristics |
Degree of Accuracy |
|
|
Magnetic orientation |
+/- 1 |
|
|
Inertial orientation |
+/- 5 |
|
|
Magnetic orientation |
+/- 10 |
|
|
Inertial orientation |
+/- 15 |
|
Comments: |
|
*Physics-based calibration from first principles on devices using an approved method. Comparative measurements from to the device to those taken simultaneously from a device certified by the U.S. Navy or other U.S. Government entity. |
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
Section 6.a Transducer/Sub-Assembly Manufacturing Steps |
A. |
State whether your company 1) is capable of performing each of the following transducer manufacturing steps at U.S-based and/or non-U.S. based facilities it owns and/or operates, 2) indicate whether it plans to retain each identified capability through 2015, and 3) identify the company's three most important non-U.S. facilities. |
Manufacturing Steps |
Company-Controlled U.S.-Based Capability |
Retain Through 2015? |
Number of U.S.-based employees experienced in this process |
Company-Controlled Non-U.S. Based Capability |
Retain Through 2015? |
Non-U.S. Company Facilities - Top Three Countries By Production ($$$) |
1 |
2 |
3 |
Formulation and firing of piezoceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application of electrodes on piezoceramics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polarization of piezoceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of piezoelectric properties in piezoceramics (including d-constants, k electromechanical coupling, elastic properties or frequency constants, dielectric properties, etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth of piezocrystal materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application of electrodes on piezocrystals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing of electrode adhesion in piezocrystals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polarization of piezocrystal materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of piezoelectric properties in piezocrystals (including d-constants, k electromechanical coupling, elastic properties or frequency constants, dielectric properties, etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonding of similar and dissimilar materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hermetic Sealing of Pressure Vessels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated electronics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetics design (tuning and matching circuits) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miniature Electronics Assembly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducer build |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potting for submerged use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing of handling requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telemetry wiring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Report the number of U.S.-based and/or non-U.S. based vendors your company uses to perform each of the following transducer manufacturing steps. For each, indicate whether this utilization of U.S.-based and Non-U.S. vendors will increase, decrease, or remain the same through 2015. |
Manufacturing Steps |
Utilize U.S.-Based Vendor? |
Change Through 2015 |
Utilize Non-U.S. Based Vendor? |
Non-U.S. Based Vendors - Top Three Countries By 2011 Purchases ($$$) |
% Change Through 2015 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
Formulation and firing of piezoceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application of electrodes on piezoceramics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polarization of piezoceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of piezoelectric properties in piezoceramics (including d-constants, k electromechanical coupling, elastic properties or frequency constants, dielectric properties, etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth of piezocrystal materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application of electrodes on piezocrystals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing of electrode adhesion in piezocrystals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polarization of piezocrystal materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of piezoelectric properties in piezocrystals (including d-constants, k electromechanical coupling, elastic properties or frequency constants, dielectric properties, etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonding of similar and dissimilar materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hermetic Sealing of Pressure Vessels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated electronics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetics design (tuning and matching circuits) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miniature Electronics Assembly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducer build |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potting for submerged use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing of handling requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telemetry wiring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.1 |
Describe the process by which final products are calibrated, and what data/analysis are provided in calibration reports to customers. |
|
C.2 |
Are these tests performed in house? |
|
Comment: |
|
C.3 |
Are Navy calibrations facities required and utilized to support these tests? |
|
Comment: |
|
D. |
Describe what unique tools/machinery (large 4-axis milling machines, large ovens, etc) you utilize in the production of transducers or transducer systems. Indicate any issues with availability of these tools/machinery. |
|
E. |
If large systems are developed, how are these transported to customers? Indicate any issues with transportation scheduling. |
|
Comments: |
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Section 6.b Process Control and Standards |
A. |
Specify the types of process controls and standards your company applies to each of the following transducer manufacturing steps. For each, indicate when the last set of controls and standards were defined. |
|
Process Controls |
Last Updated |
Standards Applied |
Last Updated |
Other Process Controls Applied (specify) |
Last Updated |
Formulation and firing of piezoceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application of electrodes on piezoceramics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polarization of piezoceramic materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of piezoelectric properties in piezoceramics (including d-constants, k electromechanical coupling, elastic properties or frequency constants, dielectric properties, etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth of piezocrystal materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application of electrodes on piezocrystals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing of electrode adhesion in piezocrystals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polarization of piezocrystal materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of piezoelectric properties in piezocrystals (including d-constants, k electromechanical coupling, elastic properties or frequency constants, dielectric properties, etc). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonding of similar and dissimilar materials |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hermetic Sealing of Pressure Vessels |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated electronics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetics design (tuning and matching circuits) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miniature Electronics Assembly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transducer build |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Potting for submerged use |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testing of handling requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telemetry wiring |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
Describe how your company insures that it is meeting Navy standards and repeatability. |
|
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |
|
Section 10 Research and Development |
State your company's: 1) total (internal and external funded) research and development (R&D) dollar expenditures, 2) the type of R&D performed by percent allocation, 3) and the percentage of total R&D expenditures relating exclusively to underwater transducer and sonar system business lines, and 4) your company's R&D funding sources by percent of total R&D dollars sources.
Note: If your company's annual Total R&D Expenditures and Total R&D Funding Sources do not match, explain the discrepancy in the space provided. Note: Calendar year data is preferred. |
Source of R&D Data: |
|
R&D Reporting Schedule: |
|
A. |
R&D Expenditures |
Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 Estimated |
1. |
Total R&D Expenditures |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Basic Research (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Applied Research (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Product/Process Development (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Total (must equal 100%) |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
6. |
% of Line 1 Related to Underwater Transducers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
% of Line 1 Related to Underwater Sonar Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. |
R&D Funding Sources |
Record $ in Thousands, e.g. $12,000.00 = survey input of $12 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 Estimated |
1. |
Total R&D Funding Sources |
|
|
|
|
|
2. |
Internal/Self-Funded/IRAD (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Total Federal Government (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Federal funding from SBIR/STTR program (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Total State and Local Government (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Universities - Public and Private (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
U.S. industry, venture capital, non-profit (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
Non-U.S. investors (as a percent of Line 1) |
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
Other (specify) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
% of Line 1 Related to Underwater Transducers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
% of Line 1 Related to Underwater Sonar Systems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments: |
|
|
BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL - Per Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act |