SPST 3064-0095 (2009 Renewal)

SPST 3064-0095 (2009 Renewal).DOC

Procedures for Monitoring Bank Protection Act Compliance

OMB: 3064-0095

Document [doc]
Download: doc | pdf

SUPPORTING STATEMENT

PROCEDURES FOR MONITORING BANK PROTECTION ACT COMPLIANCE

(OMB No. 3064‑0095)



INTRODUCTION


The FDIC is requesting OMB approval of a three‑year extension of the collection of information captioned above, without any change in the method or substance of collection. This collection, which expires on September 30, 2009, is imposed on insured nonmember banks as a result 12 CFR Part 326, subpart A ‑‑ MINIMUM SECURITY DEVICES AND PROCEDURES FOR INSURED NONMEMBER BANKS.


A. JUSTIFICATION


1. Circumstances and Need


The Bank Protection Act of 1968 (12 USC 1881‑1884) requires each Federal supervisory agency to promulgate rules establishing minimum standards for security devices and procedures to discourage financial crime and to assist in the identification of persons who commit such crimes.


To avoid the necessity of constantly updating a technology‑based regulation, the FDIC takes a flexible approach to implementing this statute. It requires each insured nonmember bank to designate a security officer who will administer a written security program. The security program shall: (1) establish procedures for opening and closing for business and for safekeeping valuables; (2) establish procedures that will assist in identifying persons committing crimes against the bank; (3) provide for initial and periodic training of employees in their responsibilities under the security program; and (4) provide for selecting, testing, operating and maintaining security devices as prescribed in the regulation. In addition, the FDIC requires the security officer to report at least annually to the bank's board of directors on the effectiveness of the security program.


2. Use of Information Collected


The information is used by FDIC bank examiners to assure that insured nonmember banks comply with 12 CFR 326, which implements the Bank Protection Act of 1968, and to review bank security programs.


3. Use of Technology to Reduce Burden


The FDIC has created an interactive Website, FDICconnect, between FDIC insured institutions and the FDIC. All PRA collections are reviewed to determine if converting to electronic collection is cost beneficial. In this case, however, updates to the written security program and training materials are not required to be submitted to the FDIC. Institutions need only maintain the records for review during on-site examinations and, therefore, may use technology to the extent deemed feasible and appropriate to maintain and update the required documents.


4. Efforts to Identify Duplication


The information is collected from insured nonmember banks and does not duplicate information available within other government agencies nor in other FDIC collections.


5. Minimizing the Burden on Small Banks


The establishment of a written security program and developing training materials are one‑time requirements. Updating and maintaining the program and training materials should not involve more than a minimal burden.


6. Consequences of Less Frequent Collection


The only periodic recordkeeping requirement is the security officer's annual report to the board of directors, the completion of which is in most cases a small burden. Less frequent reporting would create a risk of inadequate security systems in insured nonmember banks.


7. Circumstances Inconsistent with 5 CFR 1320.6


The recordkeeping requirements of 12 CFR 326 are not inconsistent with 5 CFR 1320.6.


8. Consultation with Persons Outside the FDIC


A “first” Federal Register notice seeking public comment for a 60-day period was published on May 26, 2009 (74 FR 24852). No comments were received.


9. Payment or Gift to Respondents


None.


  1. Confidentiality


All information required by this recordkeeping is retained by the bank for review by FDIC bank examiners. Information obtained thereby would be exempt from public disclosure under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act.

11. Information of a Sensitive Nature


No information of a sensitive nature is collected.


12. Estimate of Annual Burden


Estimated number of respondents: 5,110 state nonmember banks

Average annual burden hours: 1/2 hour

Average annual burden hours: 2,555


13. Capital, Start-up, Operating, and Maintenance Cost Burden

None.


14. Estimated Annual Cost to Federal Government


None.


15. Reason for Change in Burden


The change in burden is an adjustment due to a reduction in the number of state nonmember banks.


16. Publication


The information is retained at the bank for review by FDIC examiners to verify compliance with regulatory requirements. No publication is made of the records.


17. Display of Expiration Date


Not applicable.


18. Exceptions to Certification


None.




B. STATISTICAL METHODS


Not applicable.






3



File Typeapplication/msword
File TitleSUPPORTING STATEMENT
AuthorFDIC
Last Modified Byleneta gregorie
File Modified2009-07-30
File Created2009-07-30

© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy