Third-Party Submissions and Protests

ICR 201206-0651-010

OMB: 0651-0062

Federal Form Document

Forms and Documents
Document
Name
Status
No forms / supporting documents in this ICR. Check IC Document Collections.
ICR Details
0651-0062 201206-0651-010
Historical Inactive 201201-0651-001
DOC/PTO
Third-Party Submissions and Protests
Revision of a currently approved collection   No
Regular
Preapproved 07/17/2012
Retrieve Notice of Action (NOA) 07/16/2012
Pre-approval contingent upon no substantive changes to this collection after adoption of the final rule. Otherwise this collection should be re-submitted to OMB for review.
  Inventory as of this Action Requested Previously Approved
07/31/2015 04/30/2014 03/31/2014
1,095 0 1,225
10,950 0 9,350
133,018 0 35,590

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is required by 35 U.S.C. 131 et seq. to examine an application for patent and, when appropriate, issue a patent. The provisions of 35 U.S.C. 122(c) and 37 CFR 1.99 and 1.291 govern the ability of a third party to have information entered and considered in, or to protest, a patent application pending before the USPTO. On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) was enacted into law, which provides a new mechanism for third parties to submit to the USPTO, for consideration and inclusion in the record of a patent application, patents, published patent applications, or other printed publication of potential relevance to the examination of the application. Specifically, Section 8 of the Leahy-Smith AIA amends 35 U.S.C. 122 by adding 35 U.S.C. 122(e), which enumerates certain conditions that apply to a third-party preissuance submission to the USPTO. The USPTO proposes to implement 35 U.S.C. 122(e) in a new rule 37 CFR 1.290 and to eliminate 37 CFR 1.99. Section 8 of the AIA takes effect of September 16, 2012, and applies to any patent application filed before, on, or after the effective date.

US Code: 35 USC 122(c) Name of Law: null
   US Code: 35 USC 131 Name of Law: null
   US Code: 35 USC 151 Name of Law: null
   US Code: 35 USC 122(e) Name of Law: null
   PL: Pub.L. 112 - 29 Section 8 Name of Law: Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
  
PL: Pub.L. 112 - 29 125 Stat. 284 Name of Law: Leahy-Smith America Invents Act

0651-AC67 Final or interim final rulemaking

No

  Total Request Previously Approved Change Due to New Statute Change Due to Agency Discretion Change Due to Adjustment in Estimate Change Due to Potential Violation of the PRA
Annual Number of Responses 1,095 1,225 570 0 -700 0
Annual Time Burden (Hours) 10,950 9,350 6,850 0 -5,250 0
Annual Cost Burden (Dollars) 133,018 35,590 97,416 0 12 0
No
No
The net decrease in responses is due to two factors: 1) the decrease in third-party submissions under the peer review pilot program and, 2) the estimated increase in the number of submissions under the new 37 CFR 1.290 due to the statutory changes of the AIA. The burden hour increase is due to the number of responses and the increase in the number of hours. The increase in cost burden is a result of the number of third-party submissions subject to the average fee of $180 and the elimination of $5,172 in postage costs as now 93% of the third party submissions will be submitted through EFS-Web.

$13,539
No
No
No
No
No
Uncollected
Raul Tamayo 5712727728 [email protected]

  No

On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with 5 CFR 1320.9 and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8(b)(3).
The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    (i) Why the information is being collected;
    (ii) Use of information;
    (iii) Burden estimate;
    (iv) Nature of response (voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory);
    (v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and
    (vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;
 
 
 
If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item by leaving the box unchecked and explain the reason in the Supporting Statement.
07/16/2012


© 2024 OMB.report | Privacy Policy