Download:
pdf |
pdfSoftware Developer Questionnaire
Introduction
On behalf of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Robert D. Niehaus, Inc. (RDN) is evaluating the
potential benefits of the Standard for the Exchange of Product Model Data (STEP) in reducing interoperability costs for
the exchange of product data. Interoperability problems arise when members of the supply chain create technical data
using different design, manufacturing, engineering, or product data management (PDM) software applications. As a
member of the industry who produces the software used in the design operations of the industries we are investigating
(transportation and electronics manufacturing), you have unique insights into the state of STEP incorporation in
CAD/CAM/CAE or PDM software. The information you provide will help NIST better assess the benefits of STEP and
the needs of this portion of the manufacturing sector, thereby allowing NIST to channel future investments towards
projects that best meet those needs. The data from this questionnaire will be used to revise projections made in NIST
Planning Report 025 (http://www.nist.gov/director/planning/upload/report025.pdf).
This questionnaire is confidential and voluntary. Please feel free to collaborate with your colleagues when answering
these questions. No one outside of RDN, Inc. will see your personal or company information. RDN has partnered with a
contractor, CIMdata, to distribute the survey. CIMdata will see the survey data but has no access to personal or
company information. We need your help to make sure we have the very best information possible and greatly
appreciate your time and efforts.
Software Developer Questionnaire
This collection of information contains Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) requirements approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Notwithstanding any other provisions of the law, no person is required to respond to,
nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB control number. Public
reporting burden for this collection is estimated to be 30 minutes for this instrument, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this collection of
information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Attn:
Fred Proctor ([email protected]) and Robert Chapman ([email protected]).
OMB Control No. 06930033
Expiration Date: 03/31/2015
Software Developer Questionnaire
Company Identification
Please enter your contact information. Company information is used in aggregate only for data analysis purposes. We
will not share your personal information or company information with anyone.
*1. Company Identification (All Fields Required)
Name:
Company/Division:
Title:
Address:
City/Town:
State:
6
ZIP:
Country:
Email Address:
Phone Number:
*2. May we contact you if we have questions about your survey responses?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
Software Developer Questionnaire
Customer Base
3. Which of the following industries best describe your customers? Please check all that
apply.
c Aerospace
d
e
f
g
c Computers & Peripherals
d
e
f
g
c Automotive
d
e
f
g
c Communication & Navigation Equipment
d
e
f
g
c Shipbuilding
d
e
f
g
c Audio & Video Equipment
d
e
f
g
c Specialty Tool & Die
d
e
f
g
c Semiconductors
d
e
f
g
c Other (please specify)
d
e
f
g
Software Developer Questionnaire
CAD/CAM/CAE or PDM Product Information
4. Please list the CAD/CAM/CAE or Product Data Management (PDM) software packages
and specialty products below that are used by your customer base. Please include your
products as well as those of your competitors.
c Pro/ENGINEER/Creo
d
e
f
g
c Mentor Graphics
d
e
f
g
c CATIA
d
e
f
g
c NX
d
e
f
g
c Zuken
d
e
f
g
c Rhino
d
e
f
g
c Unigraphics
d
e
f
g
c SolidWorks
d
e
f
g
c Inventor
d
e
f
g
c Alias
d
e
f
g
c GibbsCAM
d
e
f
g
c MATLAB
d
e
f
g
c TeamCenter
d
e
f
g
c AutoCAD
d
e
f
g
c Windchill
d
e
f
g
c Ansys
d
e
f
g
c CAMWorks
d
e
f
g
c SpaceClaim
d
e
f
g
c MasterCAM
d
e
f
g
c Nastran
d
e
f
g
c Solid Edge
d
e
f
g
c ENOVIA
d
e
f
g
c Other (please specify)
d
e
f
g
5
6
*5. Do the CAD/CAM/CAE or PDM software programs your firm markets offer STEP
neutral format functionality?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
Software Developer Questionnaire
STEP Functionality
6. What were the total expenditures to integrate STEP into your CAD/CAM/CAE or PDM
systems? (For each year, please answer in terms of total dollars. If you cannot estimate the
expenditures for a particular year, please leave the year blank.)
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Software Developer Questionnaire
STEP Functionality
7. If your products do not incorporate the STEP format (i.e. translator or import/export
capability), why not? Do you plan on incorporating STEP in the future? Please explain.
5
6
Software Developer Questionnaire
The Cost of Developing STEP Functionality
8. Was your company involved in STEP's development? If yes, please specify the research
areas and the time frame for participation.
Yes/No
Standards
Start Period
End Period
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
development process
(For example:
attended meeting or
reviewed draft
standards)
Software development
tools and testing tools
(For example:
supported the
development of
languages or libraries)
Demonstration and
certification services
(For example:
participated in the
CAxIF project or
other implementation
forums)
Software Developer Questionnaire
9. If you answered YES to any of the above, what were your approximate annual
expenditures for those activities? Please indicate whether you are answering in terms of
labor hours or total dollars, e.g. “$100,000” or “500 hours”. For reference, 1 employee
working fulltime on STEP development for 1 year is equivalent to 2080 hours.
Standards
development process
(For example: attended
meeting or reviewed
draft standards)
Software development
tools and testing tools
(For example:
supported the
development of
languages or libraries)
Demonstration and
certification services
(For example:
participated in CAxIF
or other
implementation
forums)
Software Developer Questionnaire
NIST's Activities
NIST has been active in the development and promotion of STEP in several ways: participation in the
standards development process, development of software libraries and testing tools, demonstration
of STEP capabilities, and provision of certification services.
*10. Are you aware of NIST's contributions to STEP's development?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
Software Developer Questionnaire
NIST's Impacts
In your opinion, which of the NIST contributions listed in the following table had an impact on the
development of STEP?
Please check the boxes in the table below if NIST's contributions led to:
• A broader or more versatile STEP standard (quality improvement)
• Acceleration of the development or adoption of STEP, and/or
• Reductions in the cost of developing or adopting STEP
11. Standards Development
Administrative
Quality Improvements
Acceleration
Cost Reductions
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
Support
EXPRESS (ISO
1030311)
AP 203, Configuration
controlled 3D designs
of mechanical parts
and assemblies
AP 209, Composite
and metallic structural
analysis and related
design
AP 210, Electronic
assembly,
interconnect and
packaging design
AP 214, Core data for
automotive
mechanical design
processes
AP 227, Plant spatial
configuration
AP 233, Systems
engineering data
representation
AP 238 Application
interpreted model for
computer numeric
controllers
AP 239, Product life
cycle support
Software Developer Questionnaire
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
Quality Improvements
Acceleration
Cost Reductions
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
STEP Class Library
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
Expresso
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
STEP File Checker
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
Quality Improvements
Acceleration
Cost Reductions
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
c
d
e
f
g
AP 242, Managed
model based 3d
engineering (under
development –
replaces AP203 and
AP214)
Semantic PMI
Development
12. Software Development and Testing Tools
NIST EXPRESS
Toolkit
13. Demonstration and Certification Services
CAx Implementor
Forums
STEP certification
services
14. How did you learn about NIST's contributions? In your view, what are NIST's most
beneficial activities?
5
6
Software Developer Questionnaire
NIST's Impacts
15. If one or more of NIST's activities led to cost reductions for your firm, what percentage
do you estimate those reductions to be?
16. Has STEP helped your products penetrate foreign markets?
j Yes
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
Software Developer Questionnaire
NIST's Impacts
*17. Do you think that NIST's contributions accelerated your firm's adoption of STEP in
your products?
j YES (NIST accelerated your adoption of STEP)
k
l
m
n
j NO (NIST did not impact your adoption of STEP)
k
l
m
n
Software Developer Questionnaire
NIST's Impacts
18. If YES, by how many years did NIST accelerate your adoption of STEP?
Software Developer Questionnaire
Comments
19. Please provide any additional comments that would help us evaluate the cost of
integrating STEP into your CAD/CAM/CAE or PDM software products.
5
6
Software Developer Questionnaire
End of Questionnaire
20. We thank you for your participation. Please indicate below if your would like to receive
an email with a link to the final report once it is available.
j Yes, please send me an email
k
l
m
n
j No
k
l
m
n
File Type | application/pdf |
File Modified | 2013-08-13 |
File Created | 2013-08-12 |